01-08-2015 Not "Je Suis Charlie," But "Je
Suis Socialist" More...
12-05-2014 President Obama Falsely Yells
"Fire!" in a Crowded Theatre More...
11-27-2014 Prez Obama Urges Public to
Not Riot in Fergusen Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San Francisco,
Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise Idaho and
All Major Cities in America More...
11-21-2014 Emperor Obama Issues Pink
Slips to US Congress More...
11-15-2014 Who Really Killed Osama bin
06-08-2014 Is Sgt Bergdahl Obama's Last
04-19-2011 Budget cuts are meaningless
without Federal Reserve transparency More...
News Revisited in the next 2 articles written three years ago at FM Duck and
even more applicable today since Japan's recent nuclear catastrophe:
02-22-2008 Idaho Legies create
Perfect Storm: yellowcake plus Yellowstone plus Snake Plain Aquifer equals
radioactive Super Volcanic blast More...
03-25-2008 Gov Butch Otter signs corporate
welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for
Perfect Nuclear Storm: a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of
Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie More...
03-01-2011 A Union Education...or
What Wisconsin reveals about public workers and political power More...
02-14-2011 Idaho Statesman claims
"nullification" of Obamacare is "immoral" More...
02-03-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 3 of 3 More...
02-02-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 2 of 3 More...
01-29-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 1 of 3 More...
11-21-2010 Idaho on the Verge of
Bankruptcy in 2012 More...
10-30-2010 New silver class action
invokes RICO against JP Morgan, HSBC More...
10-30-2010 Idaho Voters, Who Should You
Vote For... and Which Amendments? More...
10-27-2010 Federal Reserve Commits
Treason as it Asks 18 Major Banks How Much Money They Want the Fed to Give
Them to “Stimulate” the Economy: $250 Billion, $500 Billion, $1 Trillion,
$2 Trillion or More… More...
02-10-2010 European Central Bankers
Poised to Take Over Europe… More...
02-05-2010 Secret Banking Cabal Emerges
From AIG Shadows… More...
12-21-2009 ObamaCare is not about health
care; it’s about control and profits. Oddly enough, it’s not the insurance
companies; it’s the central bankers… More...
12-02-2009 Boise Trolley Folly DOES
Justify Legislative Intervention More...
11-06-2009 Federal Reserve to Switch to New
"Scratch 'N Sniff" Currency More...
10-27-2009 New Government Health Care
Plan Struggling to Find "Single Payer" Name More...
10-26-2009 Jesus appoints Obama as
"Associate Christ" More...
09-23-2009 Has Congress become an
09-18-2009 Leftist Boise Mayor Dave
Bieter in secret meetings to blow $560 million of federal welfare dollars on
downtown Boise streetcar named “Desire”… or is that a streetcar named “Huge
09-8-2009 Hey, kids, got game? Got
rap? Wanna be a rich movie star? “That isn’t hard work,” says Obama, “and
chances are you ain’t gonna be any of those things.” More...
09-8-2009 "Obama's speech to schools:
what civics lesson will parents teach their kids?” More...
08-14-2009 Two Governors Bankrupt
Idaho's Highways, or Who let the GARVEE bonds out? More...
08-07-2009 "National" health care?
Stop thinking in terms of "collectives," we are individuals More...
08-05-2009 Fed Reserve, America's legal
counterfeiting ring More...
Statesman pushes Fascist Business Model as “Vision for the Valley”More...
09-06-2008 Look out!
Pistol Packing Mama, Gov Sarah Palin, blasts her way into the Republican
accepts VP slot with John McCain
chooses Idahoan Sarah Palin, a moose-hunting, fisher-babe, free market
Governor of Alaska, as Vice Prez running mate on GOP ticket
08-23-2008 Idaho stockpiles $500
million to $1 billion tax surplus on top of last year's $224 million
08-19-2008 Washington politicians
lie about true size of budget deficit More...
08-12-2008 Corporate Welfare
Alive and Well in Idaho More...
08-01-2008 "Covered Bonds" new
mortgage gimmick by "Banksta Gangsta" Treasury Sec Hank Paulson More...
07-17-2008 History of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac reveal gross corruption, fundamental flaws More...
07-03-2008 Zimbabwe inflation
hits 1,000,000% per year…
Government central bank issues new $50 Billion denomination notes as
paper currency becomes worthless More...
06-23-2008 Idaho Supreme Court
enforces socialist health care law…
Taxpayers must cough up $187,000 for illegal immigrant’s heart attack More...
“nightmare ticket” promises to drag U.S. down the road to serfdom via
Marxist socialism More...
05-30-2008 Idaho Pub Ed System
Run by Village Idiots?...
State Board Asks Feds to Restart Failure Clock for “No Child Left Behind”
05-21-2008 Kempthorne Hugs Polar
Bankrupts America More...
05-16-2008 Yeah, Kempthorne,
"Cough up" those gubernatorial records, will ya? More...
05-11-2008 Idaho: nuclear
waste dump of America More...
04-22-2008 2008 Legislative
Report Card for Idaho: F-minus More...
04-01-2008 Fed scientists
discover new element in Periodic Table of Elements: Paper More...
03-25-2008 Gov Butch Otter signs corporate
welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for
Perfect Nuclear Storm: a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of
Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie More...
09-25-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... The solution: abolish fractional reserve central
banking, the Federal Reserve and govt monopoly of money; allow private
minting and free choice of currencies - Part 5 More...
09-20-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... The problem: unconstitutional Federal Reserve
plays Quantitative Economics (as if econ is physics) rather than Qualitative
Economics, which is based upon individual rights and freedom - Part 4 More...
09-17-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... Derivative markets now exceed half a quadrillion dollars or
$500,000,000,000,000 of non-collateralized paper - Part 3 More...
09-16-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending
recession - Part 2 More...
09-15-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending
recession - Part 1 More...
09-05-2007 Boise's Toiletgate morphs into
Pinocchio-gate as Senator Craig's nose mysteriously grows another 2 feet
09-02-2007 Senator Larry Craig did not
resign and hired two lawyers, 1 for the Ethics Committee and 1 for the
Minneapolis men's room debacle
08-31-2007 Senator Larry Craig's abuse of
power & lame excuses are symptomatic of long list of GOP political abuses in
Idaho - Part 1
08-23-2007 J'accusse, Mr. Federal Reserve
did it with the Candlestick, the Rope, the Revolver, the Knife, the Wrench,
and the Lead Pipe in the House, the Senate, the University, and Wall Street
08-13-2007 Ada County Commissioners condemn
own property through eminent domain...
Pay Cryptic Partners $3.2 million in fake "takings" - Part 1
08-11-2007 Central bankers redefine
"hyper-inflation" as "liquidity"... Inject over $326,000,000,000 into global
economy to stave off stock market crash & recession
08-10-2007 NY Stock Market crashes 387
points as sub-prime fiasco hits Germany, France
08-09-2007 WSJ, Fox News pretend Ron Paul
votes for earmarks
08-08-2007 "The Fix" is still in, new
community college trustees interview only 1 person for Prez... and guess
what? He got the job!
07-30-2007 Harry Potter dies on page 597...
07-18-2007 "The fix was in... But that's OK;
This case warranted an inside job." -- Dan Popkey, Idaho Statesman
07-17-2007 Is the War in Iraq a Mafia-style
protection racket: U.S. military protects OPEC and OPEC promises to use only
07-10-2007 Ex Ada County Commish Judy
Peavey-Derr threatens libel lawsuit against Deep Throat II
07-05-2007 Idaho Senator Craig loses Illegal
Immigration Amnesty bill...Does Craig support prison inmates picking Idaho
07-03-2007 U.S. Constitution not signed by
Does surgery for cancer cause more
When Good Cells Go Bad (cancer:
who's right: viral theory or trophoblast theory?)More...
amazing cartoon was in the Chicago Tribune in
1934. Look carefully at the plan of
action. Note who's driving the out-of-control wagon: university
professors. Note Stalin and Karl Marx babbling the same type of Obama
fascist Progressive plan to "fundamentally transform" America. Remember the adage,
"Those who do not remember the past aredoomed to repeat it."
Sound money is a basic human right, derived from private
property rights. Alasdair Macloed says it best:
"Firstly, it is a basic human right to choose to save
without our savings being debased by the tax of monetary inflation. Those
who are worst affected by this inflation tax are not the rich -- they
benefit -- but the poor and the barely well-off, which is why monetary
inflation undermines society and why the right to sound money should be
respected. If government gives itself a monopoly over money, it has a duty
to protect the property rights vested in it.
"Secondly, it is a basic right for us to own our own money rather than have
it owned by the banks. For them to take our money and expand credit on the
back of it debases it. It is an abuse of an individual's property rights and
a banking licence is a government licence to do so. If anyone else was to do
this, they would be guilty of fraud. Banks should be custodians of our
money, and it should not appear in their balance sheets as their property."
ironic and sad, then, that advocates of recognizing gold and silver as
money, as was done in not-so-olden times, should be characterized as
conservatives, reactionaries, and worse when they are actually liberators
and when advocates of infinitely 'elastic' currency are actually the great
enablers of totalitarianism throughout the world.
money guarantees a stable yet progressive economy where people are truly
equal. It allows people to save properly for their retirement so that they
will not become a burden on the state. It leads to democracy voting for
small governments. It encourages peaceful trade and discourages war. It is
the only path, after this mess, that leads us to long-lasting and peaceful
prosperity. We really need everyone to understand this for the sake of our
When plunder becomes a way of life for a
group of men... they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal
system that authorizes it, and a moral code that glorifies it.– Frederic Bastiat,
The Law 
Sound familiar in 2012? Look around.
Must see movie out on DVD:
"The people should not be afraid of their government; Governments should be
afraid of their people."
Who is but the form following the function of what, and what I am is a man
in a mask.”
can see that.”
course you can. I’m not questioning your powers of observation. I’m merely
remarking on the paradox of asking a masked man who he is.”
this most auspicious of nights, permit me then, in lieu of the most
commonplace sobriquet, to suggest the character of this most dramatis
In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran cast vicariously as both victim and
villain by the vicissitudes of fate.
visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now
vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation,
stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin
vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious
violation of volition.
The only verdict is vengeance,
a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of
such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this
vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it’s
my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.”
Did You Know...?
The Ten Commandments contain 297 words. The Bill of Rights is stated
in 463 words. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address contains 266 words. A
recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911
Amendment X to the Constitution
of the United States, together with Article I, Section 8, prohibits the U.S.
Congress from involving itself in cabbage pricing, education, health care,
personal safety, campaign financing, most criminal law, toilet capacity, the
banning of amino acid supplements (such as tryptophan), vitamins (such as
B-17) and thousands
of other things it has gotten away with so far.
Quickie News Briefs
Friday May 22, 2015
-- Fri May 22,
2015 News Flash to Megyn Kelly at
FOX News and all 2016 presidential candidates who have forgotten recent
history: Did Saddam Hussein
have Weapons of Mass Destruction or not? Read the following by Ann
Coulter: Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say that Jeb Bush is
May 16, 2015 Super Bowl quarterback Tom Brady and the Players' Union
are suing the National Football League (the NFL) for blaming Brady for
deflating footballs during an NFL playoff game against the Indianapolis
Colts. Brady's team, the New England Patriots, was fined a million
smackeroos, Brady was barred from playing their team's first 4 games next
season, and the Patriots lose their first two NFL draft picks. FM
Duck's Big Question is: Where in hell do the referees in the NFL stand
in all of this? It is up to the refs to "ref" the game, isn't it?
Don't they touch the football a thousand times during each 4-hour game?
Are they not responsible for making sure the football during the game is
properly inflated? Who's responsibility is it? The Fat Lady in
the end zone bleachers? The Head Ref's grandmother? C'mon,
sports fans, judges, juries, other football players, the Ref Association,
and beautiful blonde sportscaster women who have never thrown a football in
their life and ask the coaches at half time how their little toe feels.
It is up to the referees. Period. End of story. But nobody
in the NFL, nobody in the news media, and no Fat Lady in the bleachers has
popped up and said, "Hey, what are the refs getting paid for if not to
adjudicate the damn football game?" And that includes the amount of
air in the football, you clowns. Next thing you know, the refs are
going to ask people on live twitter what the next call should be since the
refs have no responsibility for reffing the game, right? Headlines:
"Tom Brady fined for throwing football spitballs using Vaseline hidden in
his jockstrap. TSA forgets to X-ray Tom Brady before Super Bowl Game.
Obama trades Tom Brady and four receivers for Bowe Bergdahl." Where
does this end? Let's use some common sense. Make the refs do
their job: namely, check everybody's balls, especially the blonde women
sportscasters, the latter for which I volunteer.
May 16, 2015 Boston Bomber Islamic terrorist Abduhl Mohammed Bozo
Tsarneav Whatever received the death penalty from a jury in Boston yesterday
for his part in setting off bombs that killed and maimed runners at the
Boston Marathon finish line last year, or was it a year ago? Who can
keep track of all the atrocities that the Islamic terrorists are committing
on a daily basis? Does this mean that Bozo gets to claim himself as a
martyr for Allah, if ten years later after the fact (the bombing) he is
hung, shot, lethally injected, or electrocuted for his act of knocking
off infidels? That seems like a long stretch to claim that Abduhl Bozo
will have died in the act of killing infidels. I mean, the appellate
process alone will probably take about ten years. Does the Islamic
religion claim that you can set off a bomb, twiddle your thumbs in a prison
cell for ten to fifteen years, get fried in the electric chair, and still
claim that you died in battle? Really? Whoa, what a Klingon
warrior. But why not? Sharia Law
and the Islamic terrorists seem to be making up their own moral philosophy
as they go along, sort of like a bunch of little kids playing marbles on the
playground and arguing that because it's Friday it's now OK for little
Johnny's thumb to be inside the marble circle when he shot little Freddie's
cat's eye marble out of the ring. Uh-huh. Kind of like the Obama
White House: the rules for his executive authority change every day.
Let's see now, is this Tuesday? Well, hell, then it's OK for Obama to
release 5 Gitmo terrorists in exchange for US Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl
without asking Congress, plus if it's an even numbered day, Obama can throw
in an unconstitutional authority to grant amnesty to 10 million Illegals
storming across our southern border so they can vote for the Democrats next
year. Merry Xmas. Yessss, indeed. And that's
how Islamic terrorist law works, too: by the seat of their turbans,
the little butt heads. Back to the scene of the crime. Perhaps
the Boston jurors in the Bozo Tsarnaev case should have voted for life
imprisonment for little Brother Bozie. That way, he would not be
granted martyrdom by the Islamic terrorists, at least as the Islamic rules
currently stand at this nanosecond in time. Tisk, tisk. Bozo's
older brother who died during his terrorist act of trying to escape gets to
go to Islamic Heaven and rape 72 virgins but poor little Brother Bozo who
gets life imprisonment in Super Max, Colorado, receives no Medal of
Martyrdom and goes directly to Hell for getting caught by the infidels.
Tough luck Little Boze. You should have strapped your bomb to your own
ass, driven out to hodunk, and blown yourself up (with three infidel ducks in
the marshes) to Kingdom Come. Then again, maybe President Obama will
pardon you and let you out of Super Max in three months, trading you for a
dead elephant from Pakistan.
May 15, 2015 All of the GOP presidential candidates were recently
asked by Megyn Kelly and other FOX News journalists, "Knowing what we know
now, namely that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq
after the New York Twin Towers attack, would you have authorized going to
war against Saddam Hussein in Iraq?" Dutifully accepting the premise
that there were no WMDs in Iraq, all GOP presidential candidates from Carly
Fiorina to Jeb Bush to Rand Paul to Marco Rubio to you-name-it said, "No."
Really? But wait a minute. It was just reported by the NY Times,
Wall Street Journal and other news rags that ISIS in 2014 found all kinds of
WMDs in Iraq as they stormed over major Iraqi cities after Obama pulled
essentially all the US troops out of Iraq. ISIS discovered caves full
of sarin gas rockets and other terrorists have found lots of yellowcake, the
precursor to making nuke bombs. The condition of the sarin and mustard
gas rockets were in bad shape but that does not mean they were in bad shape
when George Bush initiated the war almost 13 years ago. And who says
that ISIS can't pick up the formula from these weapons to create new ones,
especially since stupid Obama left so many US weapons on the battle field in
his hasty retreat of American troops from Iraq including billions in
accessible bank accounts? The tons of nuclear yellowcake can be
converted to nuclear bombs today. And who is invading Iraq?
Iran. And who is President Obama trying to make a nuclear deal with,
with no success? Iran. ISIS is Iran and the Mullahs who are
running ISIS have just lucked into a whole lot of WMDs that they can now
exploit. So, the real problem is that the GOP has now bought into the
baloney that George Bush started a war in Iraq when, the left Liberals
claim, there was and, they believe, still is no proof of WMDs, even though
the left Liberal news media are reporting that ISIS has found many WMDs.
GOP presidential candidates: please check your premises before you
answer questions whose premises may be false. If the news about ISIS
is correct, then the correct answer to the question, "Should Bush have gone
to war against Saddam Hussein because Saddam was stockpiling and using (he
gassed a lot of his own people) WMDs?" should be a resounding, "Yes,
indeed!" It wasn't a question of whether there were WMDs, there
apparently were. However, the war going in by Bush, and the war going
out by Obama, were both executed very badly -- especially the exit by Obama.
Yes, people (including Americans and others) needed to be saved, just like
in Vietnam, the average every day Joe Doe needed to be saved. But once
the politicians took over, in both Vietnam and Iraq, everything went to hell
in a hand basket. The GOP should find out the truth and then answer
news journalists accordingly instead of just accepting erroneous premises.
It is Obama and the left Liberals who are now placing the entire world in
jeopardy as they totally underestimate ISIS and the moral philosophy of
Islam. Pied Piper Barack Obama has led the youth of America into a
false future scenario with socialist sophisms of sugar plum fairy day
dreams, and they will pay for it dearly unless a more enlightened
presidential candidate suddenly emerges. We do not need a war hawk who
simply supports crony socialists in the military industrial complex (they
are not free market capitalists) and we do not need pacifists falling for
the lies of Islamic Mullahs. We need leaders who have the experience
and rational logic to understand how to strategically and tactically undo
the current rampage of altruistic state collectivism, which in the Middle
East is altruistic religious collectivism. Forget Obama's "good
intentions." The road to hell is paved with "good intentions."
Watch Hillary Clinton win the presidency in 2016 as the Left gains the
sanction of their victims: namely all the Republican presidential
candidates who have failed to check their premises in many areas of social
political and economic thought.
May 10, 2015 OK, this is Mother's Day, so let's talk football.
What's all this crap about accusing Patriot's quarterback Tom Brady with
"deflating" footballs used in the NFL? Even if each opposing team gets
to provide their own footballs for any given game, they cannot do much to
affect the inflation of their footballs outside the given guidelines.
First, every game has at least 7 referees, many of whom handle the football
multiple times before and after EVERY SINGLE PLAY for 3-4 hours per game.
Are we supposed to believe that some player on one of the teams can deflate
all of his team's provided footballs below the legal limit and not one of
the 7 referees has the ability or brains to detect that the footballs are
too flabby or wobbly? Second, both teams get to use the same footballs
throughout the game. If a lower poundage helps one team then it would
also help the other team. It's not just the quarterback that handles
the ball, it's also the center, the receivers, the cornerbacks, the
halfbacks, the fullbacks, the punters, the point after the score kickers,
and so on. To suggest that lowering the air pressure in all the
footballs provided by one team for a game helps that team's quarterback and
does not help the opponents or even hinders said quarterback's other
teammates approaches a level of total absurdity. In the specific game
under question -- all this whining and cry-babbying by the Colts who lost to
the Patriots in a playoff game before the Super Bowl Game in which the score
was something like 38 (Patriots) to 3 (Colts) -- stretches this entire
Deflation Gate Hypothesis to incredible stupidity. The bottom line is:
the 7 referees handle the footballs multiple times per pay for 4 hours each
game. If they are unable to tell the difference between a legal
football and an illegal football, we need to shut down the NFL and go watch
tennis, in which, by the way, the tennis players choose (during each serve
throughout the entire match) which tennis ball offered up by the ball
boys/girls that they want to use for each serve and thus which ball is used
during the resulting play after each serve. Similarly, the 3-4 refs in
soccer check the balls used during a soccer match and are responsible for
the inflation of each ball. No, it ain't up to the goalie, Martha;
it's up to the referee of the game. Back to football: News media and
other whiners who probably couldn't throw a spiral if their life depended
upon it, zip your lips about the possibility of a quarterback affecting the
inflation poundage of all the footballs used in a game, fooling all the
refs, and thus determining the outcome of a game. That's ridiculous.
Go 49er's! And Manchester United...
Apr 06, 2015 Addendum on freedom of speech. The reason that one
must confront the religion of Islam vis a vis freedom of speech is that one
of the basic tenets of Islam denies inherent individual rights, especially
for women. While so-called peaceful Muslims claim they do not agree
with Islamic terrorists, where are these peaceful Muslims? Who is
really in charge of the Muslim religion, the Mullahs in Iran and other
Middle East nations or Muslims sitting around in America doing and saying
nothing about how their religion is being expressed throughout the world?
Doing nothing, not confronting the bullies in Islam who are slaughtering
innocent victims, has brought about the fanaticism of Islamic terrorists all
across the world. All the major Earth religions are different forms of moral
philosophy. Any moral philosophy that holds as one of its basic tenets
that women do not have inherent individual rights of freedom of speech,
freedom of association, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, or any
other inherent freedoms is not a true religion -- not a true moral philosophy
supports an individual's right to life, a right to one's own mind, body, and
soul. For example, if a major religion claims that its adherents can
rob banks, kill people, and redistribute other people's money, and claims
that it's OK because that is
part of their religion, they are morally wrong. Any religion whose
basic axiomatic primaries contain the abrogation of other individuals'
rights, is not a true religion; it is slavery.
Any religion that claims contradictory concepts that disregards others'
inherent rights is not a religion. At least it is not a religion for
life. At best, it is simply a vicious
cult. And those who adhere to those principles -- such as Sharia Law
in which women have no rights -- but claim they are peaceful
or moderate are truly kidding themselves and, in fact, are simply subsidizing bad
behavior. Islam, as it is expressed today throughout the world via
Sharia Law, is a
bankrupt moral philosophy that does not recognize even the basic inherent
rights of men, women, and children.
Those who initiate force and fraud have, by their actions, given up their
rights. The victims of Islamic terrorists have the right of self
defense and that is exactly what Ms. Geller who set up the Mohammed Cartoon
Drawing Contest did to protest the current bankrupt cult of Islam, and she
did it in a peaceful mode of protest. She did not initiate force or
fraud against the two Islamic terrorists who showed up to kill innocent
people who were peacefully protesting Sharia Law at the Dallas Cartoon Contest.
And FOX TV news reporter Megyn Kelly seems to be the only commentator who
stood up for inherent individual rights by stating it is not the CONTENT of
a speech that defines freedom of speech, but rather the act of peacefully
speaking. The fact that a peaceful Cartoon Contest questioning the
tenets of a contradictory vicious religious cult was physically attacked by
adherents of the
very religion that Ms. Geller was protesting speaks volumes about who is
right and who is wrong. Nobody has the right to initiate violent
attacks against somebody who is peacefully protesting the
tenets of Islam or any other religion. That is what freedom of speech
means and too many news commentators, both on the left and the right, still
do not get it. Once again, a religion's basic tenet cannot be the
abrogation of other individuals' inherent rights. Otherwise, that
religion's moral philosophy is nothing but a collectivist cult of illogical,
disconnected thought globs. Welcome to Islam.
Apr 06, 2015 Two Islamic jihadists showed up to a Dallas convention
center in order to knock off as many attendees as they could at a Draw a
Cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed Contest. But as soon as they
encountered a police security blockade at the convention parking lot
and then jumped out and opened fire with automatic weapons against the
police, one of the security police shot and killed both jihadists with his
trusty 9 mm service weapon. Now the news media, including some at FOX
News are blaming the deaths of the jihadists on the sponsor of the Mohammed
Cartoon Drawing Event, Pamela Geller. Ms. Geller states that she was
holding the Cartoon Drawing Event (1) to show Islamic terrorists that they
cannot prohibit her First Amendment right to freedom of speech, and (2) in
sympathy with the French and European cartoonists who were murdered for also
drawing cartoons of the so-called prophet Mohammed. FOX News host Bill
O'Reilly joined with the typical left Liberal journalists and TV
commentators in saying that while Ms. Geller has a First Amendment right to
hold such a contest, they think that it was rather rude and unnecessary to
do so. They blame Ms. Geller and the cartoon participants for the
shootings and deaths. So, let's analyze exactly what the issue really
is. First, everybody agrees that Ms. Geller has the First Amendment
right to implement such a drawing contest. But then, this is where
those who do not understand the true philosophy of freedom of speech go
bezonkers as they criticize the Muslim Prophet Cartoon Contest.
Namely, they jump ahead to one of the possible outcomes -- that Muslims
would be offended and might murder somebody -- and then, based upon that
possible illegal outcome, claim, therefore, that Ms. Geller's action --
freedom of speech -- should not happen or be allowed to happen. But
wait a minute. Isn't that exactly the point? That is,
curtailment of freedom of speech should not be dependent upon what some
loonies, or terrorists, or even peaceful Muslims may or may not do, or may
or may not think, about the speech, the cartoon drawings in this case.
This is not the same thing as crying "Fire" in a crowded theatre where there
is no fire since in that case, crying "Fire" is the initiation of fraud by
an individual who has an implied contract with the other theatre-goers to
not lie about a hazardous condition inside a darkened theatre. Drawing
cartoons to question the tenets of any religion whether it be Christian,
Muslim, Jewish, or Voodoo Witch Doctors on Bourbon Street in New Orleans is
the inherent right of every American. The reason the Foundation
Fathers put freedom of speech in the US Constitution was exactly what Ms.
Geller used it for: to argue against other people's moral philosophy
that denies inherent individual rights, especially those rights of women.
It is just as much your right to make fun of Muslims who claim they get to
cohort with 72 virgins if they knock off a Christian or a Jew as it is your
right to make fun of Christian Easter Bunnies and kids searching for Easter
eggs or Jews wearing beanie hats with propellers on them, or whatever.
The big difference is that Islamic terrorists are currently slitting
Christians' and Jews' throats all over the world and claiming Mohammed said
it was their duty to do so. To make things worse, the so-called
peaceful Muslims not slitting anybody's throats are simply sitting around
doing nothing and thus condoning those actions. Inaction is often the
same as support for bad actions by others. The only TV news host who
appeared to understand the meaning, both legally and philosophically, of
inherent individual rights to freedom of speech was Megyn Kelly on FOX News.
It is not the subject matter per se, i.e., the content of the speech, that
matters but rather the moral philosophy that allows the act of freedom of
speech. What one says is not the issue; the inherent right to say it
is what matters. In fact, the more incendiary the subject matter --
omitting the false cry of "Fire" in a crowded theatre when there is no fire
-- the more important it is that Americans should exercise their freedom of
speech. What if Adolph Hitler was trying to take over America and you
wanted to blast him with a speech. Should you not do it because Adolph
might call out the Brown Shirts and shoot up the crowd? What if Adolph
said you can't talk against his Nazism? That is what Ms. Geller and
Ms. Kelly were stating: the Nazis of the Islamic terrorist group who
are embedded in the general Muslim religion do not get to dictate whether we
are allowed freedom of speech. Good for you Ms. Kelly, for recognizing
and standing up for the real philosophical issue in this case, and good for
you Ms. Geller for showing the Islamic terrorists and everybody else that
they cannot dictate the terms of any individual's right to freedom of
speech. The rest of the news media? Cowards. Their motto:
Oh, sob, sob, don't challenge the bullies or they might get angry.
Good. Let them get angry. It's about time somebody stood up for inherent individual rights
and made the Islamic terrorists angry. God knows, ain't nobody in the
US Congress or the Obama Administration standing up for our rights. In
fact, Obama and Congress are both destroying our freedoms left and right,
except for a few Tea Party Libertarians such as Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.
Apr 30, 2015 President Obama popped onto national TV to tell everybody
that the cause of the riots in Baltimore is lack of enough social,
education, and jobs funding by Congress. Really? Let's look at
this assertion. According to reporter/analyst Michelle Malkin, Obama
and the Liberals in 2009 rammed an $840 billion "stimulus" package through
Congress to ha-ha "stimulate" the economy. Right. Counterfeiting
the money supply is now called a "stimulus." Perhaps none of that
trillion dollar pork made it to Baltimore, ya think? $64 billion went
to public school districts; $50 billion went for "other education" porky pig
programs, including $13 billion for low-income public school kids, $4.1
billion for Head Start and other babysitting services so mom and dad could
wheel and deal drugs down at the corner of Walk and Don't Walk without being
bothered by little Johnny or Suzie, one of about six of unwed Mommy's children,
$650 million for educational technology like how to turn the pages of a book
or log onto the Internet with a cell phone, $200 million to working college
kids forking over $33,000 per year for a degree in Underwater Basket
Weaving and wondering why they can't get a job, and $70 million for homeless children, the same children whose moms
and dads are selling crack down at Filth and Main. On the jobs welfare
front, Obama distributed $230 billion of money looted from American
taxpayers for "shovel ready" jobs which did not exist. $26 billion
went to Big Labor Unions for an EduJobs program. The feds already had
47 jobs programs funded by nine different federal agencies. The
federal robbers in each agency must have been tripping all over each other's
shoelaces performing the same bureaucratic bull$hit in quadruplicate.
In 2014, Obama cranked up another $1 billion for early childhood education
for kids aged birth to five. Right after Obama's $1 trillion booty
distribution in 2009, he created a SERVE America Act to dispense another $6
billion, $1.1 billion for "investment in national America services," $97
million for Learn and Serve America Youth Engagement Zones -- whatever the
Hell that means -- and $400 million for the Social Innovation and Volunteer
Generation Fund. Ditto, what does that mean? Apparently
somebody hijacked Maryland's portion of all this loot on its way to Baltimore?
Apr 29, 2015 Race riots continue in Baltimore, Maryland, as President
Obama urges the rioters to continue demonstrating peaceably because, as he
states on national TV, "there is racial inequality that still exists all
across America." So, outside agitators, taking their clue from
our clueless leader, continue throwing rocks and bricks at the police,
burning down senior citizen homes and small businesses, and bust open
windows of liquor and other retail stores to steal bottles of booze, TVs,
and other items. Like, President Obama and the DOJ had no idea that
their little race-baiting sycophants such as Al Sharpton and other paid
outside agitators wouldn't burn down the city of Baltimore as they did
Ferguson for the same ridiculous reasons. Never let a good crisis go
to waste, right? So, what's really going on in Baltimore, Maryland?
As FOX reporter Bill O'Reilly stated on national TV last night, here are the
ethnic crime stats for Baltimore: 90% of the murders committed in
Baltimore are committed by blacks; 90% of the victims of murder in Baltimore
are committed by blacks; 80% - 90% of the robberies, assaults, rapes,
looting, and general crime in Baltimore are committed by blacks; 80% or more
of the victims of all crime committed in Baltimore are blacks; blacks
constitute 65% of the population of Baltimore; the Mayor of Baltimore is
black; the majority of the Baltimore City council is black; the police chief
of Baltimore is black and the majority of the police department is black;
the Maryland House Majority Leader is a black woman. Hmmm, does this
sound like we have a RACIAL problem in Baltimore, OR... is something else
going on? And Baltimore is not unique in its ethnic crime statistics.
Chicago, New York, LA, Oakland, Washington DC, and other large cities report
similar ethnic crime stats. Why? What is the cause for the high
ethnic crime rate, besides the fact that the majority of the residents --
vics and perps -- are both black? What other factors exist?
One of the main factors is that the federal and state governments have
intervened into the lives of the inner city residents with a "War on
Poverty." Yes, a War on Poverty. The left Liberals in America
are now witnessing the results of altruistic state collectivism, socialism,
social welfare programs consisting of food stamps, aid to single moms with
tons of children, "free" medical care, and all sorts of government welfare.
Thus, the War on Poverty has created exactly the opposite of what the left
Liberals in America anticipated: namely, that socialism can solve
poverty when, in actuality, socialism creates poverty. It also creates
lots of crime as everybody tries to respond to the government to become as
impoverished as they can be in order to collect free government welfare.
Women try to have as many babies as possible; the more children the more
government money. Women strive to not get married; single household
women with lots of children receive more government money; hence, children
grow up with NO FATHERS. Coupled with the government's War on Drugs --
which is a national joke and doesn't work -- youths in the ghettoes quickly
find out they can make more money dealing in drugs than obtaining an
education. Coupled with the War on Poverty (socialism) and the War on
Drugs is the War on Education, namely the government's implementation of a
federally controlled Public -- i.e. socialist -- Education System.
Youths in the ghetto do not take Public Education seriously, and therefore
don't attend, because it doesn't pay as much as dealing in drugs relative to
the expended output of time and energy. In short, governmental
intervention into America's major cities with welfare handouts has been a
total failure and President Obama and his race baiters causing riots all
over America want you to believe that the solution is for everybody to hold
hands, sing cumbayah, and the federal government should continue playing
socialist welfare games. Blaming it on white police doesn't work any
more because the majority of many city police departments are black.
Now what? Instead of President Obama -- an economic village idiot of
the first degree -- urging for a return to free market capitalism, he,
instead, proposes more and more welfare socialism, keeping inner city blacks
under the government's thumb and obtaining more and more government power
for the bureaucrats in Washington DC who are happy to receive huge salaries
for mismanaging all their Wars on Everything. No wonder the people in
Baltimore are rioting. They've been set up for this outcome by the
government. The War on Poverty has turned into its only logical social
and economic outcome: a Poverty War. And the only reason race
riots don't -- or historically didn't -- break out in heavily
socialistic cities in Europe such as Germany, the USSR, Latin America such
as Cuba, and Indonesia such as China, and North Korea is because those
governments not only implement socialism but they also mow down any would be
rioters with automatic machine guns, Nazi Brown Shirts, and horrendous
prison systems and Concentration Camps. Is that where America is
headed, because the so-called "race riots" in cities like Baltimore, which
are really government socialist welfare riots, are not going to be solved by
holding hands, marching down Main Street singing cumbayah, and the federal
government passing out more "free" cookies. One last thing: from
where does the government obtain all these "free" cookies if not from
law-abiding producers in the free market? And, is that exactly what
the Obama Administration is trying to destroy: the American Middle
Class, the Fountainhead of economic productivity because Daddy Obama was a
card-carrying Communist? Are things starting to make sense now?
Things starting to fall into place? Yes, this is a war of ideas, of
objective moral philosophy: inherent individual rights and
responsibilities vs. state collectivism.
Apr 26, 2015 Ah yes, tonight's White House Correspondence dinner, more
like the White House's Laugh-a-Minute Republican Roasting dinner, which was
far, far removed from anything funny. What a spectacle. Hundreds
out of 2,600 general attendees including journalists, politicians, movie
stars and businessmen attended a dinner
hosted by President Barack Obama and members of the WH Press Corps
applauded at what has to be the lowest level of non-intellectual and social
political economic immorality ever put on by our 4th Branch of Government:
namely, the left Liberal drive-by media. Here is the group that is
supposedly protecting our First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech, but
instead of holding an adult discussion of journalism and freedom of speech,
this group of WH correspondents and the President of the United States
celebrated themselves by lowering the format and content of their
celebration dinner down to the level of welfare ghetto speak and out and out
grammatically-twisted use of the "F" word in an attempt to parody and mock
America's foundational documents and concepts of freedom with regard to
Obama's recent illegal executive actions. To wit: Obama said he
was asked, in regard to the 4th quarter of his presidency, whether he had a
"bucket list." He said his response was "no" but he had something that
rhymed with the word "bucket," after which he paused long enough for the
audience to understand that he meant a "Fu$k it" list. Many people
laughed. Some did not. Obama continued, and said, so when people questioned whether
it was legal for him to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, he
said, "Buck it," meaning of course, "Fu$k it." He continued this
play on words referring to his other illegal actions,
unconstitutional actions, and said his answers were, "Buck it." Some
people didn't laugh. Many in the audience appeared to be appalled that
the President of the United States would stoop so low. Playing on words to lower oneself down to gutter
language was not the worse part. The worse part was lowering one's
intellectual level (Obama's) of trashing the foundational concepts of our
limited constitutional government down to the level of "fundamentally
transforming America" to a socialist dictatorship. Remember that Obama
stated on national TV over 25 times that it would be unconstitutional for a
president to unilaterally grant amnesty to illegal aliens, and then he did
exactly that, in an act of "Buck it" which he meant as, "Fu$k it"
-- clearly slapping the US Constitution right in the face. Those who
laughed should be ashamed of themselves. After
roasting every Republican candidate running for the 2016 presidency -- is
that the job of the president and White House Press Corps? is that a
topic for them to celebrate? -- President Obama then introduced an alter ego
"rage" interpreter (a black actor) to stand behind him and translate
into the microphone everything Obama said into
"rage" talk as if that was what Obama really meant. So, Obama babbled his standard platitudes to the WH Press
Corps and his alter ego "rage" actor re-stated Obama's words into stereotyped
black ghetto language for the audience. So when Obama said something
such as, "I'm glad everybody here at the Press Corps dinner..." became, "All
you white people better grab yo little white asses and..." and it went
downhill from there. What was supposed to be funny,
turned out to be a highly racist stereotype rapping "rant" that was not very
funny at all. Imagine Obama talking to the audience using the
stereotypical language of Amos and Andy, but updated to today's hip-hop
recording rants. And this was the level of journalistic
intellectualism and racist immorality put on at tonight's White House
Correspondence dinner. Imagine if former President George Bush or
Ronald Regan had done the same thing from a white racist point of view.
They probably would have been impeached. The upshot was that Obama
soon went into a fake rage himself and said the same type of things that the
black actor was saying and then the black actor walked over to Michelle
Obama and uttered, "He crazy..." After Obama's gutter talk, some lady comedian from Saturday Night Live
finished the evening by even more roasting of all the Republican candidates
for the 2016 presidency, throwing a couple of doggy bon-bon ha-ha's
pretending to roast a couple of Democrats, too. Of special note was
how Obama's speech writers zeroed in on all of his supposed "conspiracy
theory" issues such as where he was born, smoking dope, and being gay in
Chicago, in order to cover them up by openly making fun of them. A
clever debating trick used by lawyers: confessing the truth by pretended denial.
How intellectual, this WH Press Corps dinner. One wonders why
attendees such as Donald Trump and GOP Congressmen/women did not stand up
and walk out the room when Obama went through his "Fu$k it" comedy routine
and his fake alter ego racist "rage" actor routine. Is that how
low our American culture has dropped, that those who are supposedly the
intellectuals and protectors of the concepts of our foundational documents
can think of no better way to celebrate their so-called journalistic
activities than to lower themselves down to gutter talk, gutter actions, and
state collectivist gutter concepts? No wonder the US is in such a sad
state of national and international affairs. Look at our leaders; look
at our journalists. Enough said. You be the judge.
Apr 24, 2015 News Flash!!
Bill and Hillary Clinton sold America to Russia for $145 million -- plus
$500,000 in speaking fees for Slick Willy. That's right, $500,000
in "speaking fees." Adding insult to injury, Bill Clinton received
$500,000 in speaking fees -- hardy har har har, "speaking fees?" -- from a
Canadian bankers' investment meeting in Alphabet-stan (spelled Russian boot
licker) where the Clintons and Russian attendees applauded the transfer of
control of 20% of the Uranium mined in the United States. Not only was
this Uranium deal illegal according to US law, Hillary Clinton signed off
that this deal was AOK while she was Sec of State.
She was not the only signer. Sec of Defense and others signed off on
this sell-out of American Uranium to our enemies in direct contradiction to
not only the current law but also a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
that Sec of State Hillary Clinton and others signed at the start of their
term with the Obama Administration. Which also begs the question:
why hasn't the Obama Administration brought these activities to the American
people's attention since President Obama knew, or should have known, about
the Uranium deal and other illegal transactions as they were posted --
according to the Clintons -- all over the Clinton's Foundation Web Site?
And since it has now been revealed, why hasn't Obama said anything about
this illegal activity, i.e., selling a 20% interest in control of US Uranium
commodities which can be used to make nuke bombs, by his Sec of State,
Hillary Clinton? While the controlling interest of 20% of the mined
Uranium from the United States was sold, one must remember that Vladimir
Putin's purchase of this Canadian company now amounts to a 51% majority
control of the company by Russia. In essence, Bill and Hillary
Clinton just sold a 51% majority control of a Canadian mining company that
itself controls 20% of America's Uranium, a sizable amount that can be used
by Russia to make yellowcake, the nuclear material used to further make
nuclear weapons. Further, Russia has hinted at possibly sending
Uranium to: yep, you guessed it: IRAN, along with the ICBM's
they are sending to the terrorist Mullahs in the Middle East. That
means that Bill and Hillary Clinton, and President Obama, are essentially
negotiating deals with Russia and Iran in allowing Iran to develop nuclear
bombs. Where is the Dept of Justice's US Attorney General Eric
Holder in all of this hullabaloo regarding the activities of Bill and
Hillary Clinton through their Clinton Foundation? No wonder Hillary
Clinton, as Sec of State, ran her own private computer system for emails and
other communication instead of using an approved secure government system.
She needed to be able to hide and destroy all of her crap. And then,
when ordered by US Congressional committees to provide her emails to the
State Dept to determine which emails should be deleted, Clinton refused and,
in fact, revealed that she had already deleted some 30,000 of the 60,000
emails transacted by her during her tenure as Sec of State, an action not
within her authority to perform. And this is what the left Liberal
Democrats have brought to the American people. Subsidizing America's
demise on every front possible, both domestic and international. Let's
be clear about one thing: these illegal and immoral activities by the
Clintons and Obama are not examples of free market capitalism. They
are not "crony capitalism" either because there is no such thing as "crony
capitalism." As soon as the government participates in the deal --
namely, Sec of State Clinton and President Obama -- their activities reek of
state collectivism, government intervention to help the players, socialism,
fascism, communism, government dictatorship. No way in hell do these
activities represent free market capitalism. Rather, they represent
the money-grubbing greedy Clintons who are simple-minded socialists using
government power of force and fraud to acquire their illegal cookies --
putting the rest of America and the world at risk of a civil war and/or WW
III. The Clintons and Obama, for all of their illegal activities
should be thrown into jail and we should throw away the key. Their
actions are despicable, treasonous, and immoral as they continually undercut
the entire philosophy of inherent individual rights and limited government
upon which this country was built. Welcome to state collectivism.
Who is John Galt?
Apr 24, 2015 Republican Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Thad
Cochran (Miss.), Susan Collins (Maine), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Lindsey Graham
(S.C.), Orrin Hatch (Utah), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Rob
Portman (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky)
joined Senate Democrats in approving the nomination of Loretta Lynch as the
next US Attorney General. The vote was 56 - 43 and the big question
is: why would these Republicans vote for a DOJ leader who appears to
be at least as bad as current DOJ leader Eric Holder? In fact, rumor
has it that Loretta Lynch is a close buddy buddy of -- you guessed it --
Eric Holder's wifester. Look for more of the same INJUSTICE from the
new DOJ as we've already experienced from the current DOJ Eric Holder.
In 2016, don't forget to go to the polls and vote OUT the above 10 RINOs if
they, indeed, are running for office at that time.
Apr 19, 2015 Dept of Homeland Security Director, Ms. Dinkleberry Leonhart,
testified before Senator Mike Lee's Committee in Congress the other
day that she could not reprimand, fire, or slap upside the head, DEA agents
who are working for her. Really? Who's in charge at the DHS
anyway? Mickey Mouse? Donald Duck? And what did Ms.
Leonhart's DEA agents do that was so wrong? Well, it seems that various agents have been humping and
partying down with prostitutes provided by major drug cartels in foreign
countries for the last umpteen years. In addition, the drug cartels
hosting said parties have also been kind enough to "watch" the DEA agents'
cell phones (copying addresses), "watch" the DEA agents' laptop computers
(snooping into what cases the agent are working on), and "watch" the DEA
agents' firearms (making sure they don't work correctly or oiling them up
with molasses) while the horny agents were dashing through hotel corridors playing 50
shades of grey with the hired hookers. Asked of Ms. Leonhart by Senator Trey Gowdey,
"So, what the hell do you do if not manage the Dept of Homeland Security?
What do you mean that you can't fire agents who have violated the DHS's
rules of conduct?" Ms. Leonhart's answer: "Duh... , I dunno...
collecting my paycheck from Obama?" Well, folks, that makes about 3 or
4 heads of Obama's departments, Lois Lerner at the IRS who got off on
violating targeted audits of GOP political rivals, DOJ jokester Eric Holder
who has been cited for contempt and general wrong doings by the US Congress
for not doing his job plus helping to start race riots across America, and the list goes on
and on in this current administration. What's next? Is Obama
going to quarter Nazi Brown Shirts in every citizens' home to make sure they
eat Michelle's high carb diet so we can all grow big butts like the First
Lady? Under President Obama's wonderful "intentions" the nation is
going to hell in a hand basket, destroying the entire Middle Class,
expanding the Caliphate war in the Middle East AND Europe, and totally
wrecking America's health care system. There is now no law, no
justice, and no management of any government workers in the current
administration. It's an Executive Dept free-for-all. America's social, political, and economic structure of
limited government, checks and balances, and free market capitalism is rapidly breaking down --
just like Obama and his socialist Commies have planned all along. In
the long run, however, if the GOP doesn't take back the government in 2016 and
re-establish some sense of rational order, Obama and his Muslim terrorist-leaning
apologists will be at the top of ISIS's hit list. And Obama thought he would
be applauded with open arms by the Iranians and the other Islamic
terrorists if he capitulated to all of their terrorist demands to allow them
to make nuclear bombs. There's a sucker born every minute. Unfortunately,
one of them landed in the Oval Office and is now, like the Pied Piper, leading the youth of
America down the path to socialist Hell. And if he doesn't finish the
job of destroying America, you can bet Hilarious Clinton will.
Apr 12, 2015 Yeaaa, lying former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton announced
today that she is running for the President of the United States. Just
what the Republicans wanted. Hillbilly Clinton should be so easy to
whip in the 2016 presidential elections that a blithering village idiot with
his left brain tied behind his back should have no problem beating her. Meanwhile,
President Barack Obama is in Panama meeting with the other dictators of the
world, pretending that Fidel and brother Raoulie Castro -- the Laurel and
Hardy of Cuba -- are just a coupla wonderful guys and it's big bad America's
fault that the Cuban government has been murdering, torturing, raping, and
throwing the Cuban people into jail by the tens of thousands over the last
5 decades. So, Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong, ignoring history, thinks he
is opening up Cuba and freeing all the people who have been oppressed by the
US by lifting economic sanctions. Really? Typical of most American Progressives, they blame
America for what ails socialist countries rather than blaming socialism itself.
The problem is not America; the problem is that Fidel Castro is a murderous
dictator who has steadfastly refused to allow Cubans to exercise their
inherent rights of freedom. Lifting economic sanctions against the
Cuban government does not help the Cuban people. It helps the Cuban
dictators continue their reign of terror against the Cuban people. The
best thing that Obama should promote is a revolution for freedom in Cuba and
the establishment of a US-style Constitution with a Bill of Rights, not
lifting economic sanctions that help brothers Fidel and Raoul Castro. As usual,
Obama has it bassackwards... again... .
Apr 05, 2015 Happy Easter to all the Christians in the world.
After all the hullaballoo surrounding last week's Indiana Law to protect the
rights of Christians and other religious groups to be able to go to court to
argue their right to choose to not participate in gay marriage ceremonies --
or any other morally objectionable practice, like baking a cake for Nazi's
or the KKK -- Christians deserve to take a spring break and hold Easter Egg
Hunts for their kids today. The left Liberal Gay Group that blasted
some poor little pizza parlor that said they (the pizzeria) would have to
refuse to participate on religious grounds in holding a gay wedding
reception on their premises, were summarily blasted themselves as the
mainstream news media tried to spread the news. Then, the mainstream
media were blasted as the majority of Americans said, "Leave the Christian
pizza parlor alone!" After which Americans sent over a million dollars
in donations to the little pizza parlor to help them rebuild from the
onslaught of the Gay Special Rights Group that had obviously overstepped
their bounds -- and the First Amendment. Those who stood around in the
street and chanted that all businesses must cater
to and participate in acts that said businesses consider morally
reprehensible looked like a bunch of zombies who just didn't get the Memo
that the US Constitution protects individuals and their religions from
governmental mandates to perform actions reprehensible to their religious
beliefs. The right to choose, the right to morally discriminate, the
right to make a morally conscious decision on one's private property -- as
long as one does not initiate the use of force or fraud against others -- is
covered as an inherent right in the First Amendment. Gays, Blacks, the
KKK, NAZI's, and the public at large DO NOT have the right to force others
to do whatever Gays, Blacks, the KKK, NAZI's, and the public at large
demand. Individuals have rights. There are no special Gay
rights, or Black rights, or Latino rights, or gender rights, or any other
GROUP rights because the concept of rights is not a collective concept, it
is an individual concept. All of the above groups fall under the
category of INDIVIDUAL RIGHTs and thus they should stand up for individual
rights, not tribal, mob, or group collectivist rights. Joining
together with like-minded people is OK, but joining together with
like-minded people and demanding special GROUP rights is to miss the point
of rights philosophy in the first place. That's why our Constitution
speaks of individual rights, and why we implemented a limited Republic
instead of a Democracy with democratic majority rule. The Founding
Fathers were very clear about this distinction in the Federalist Papers.
The Gay Left Liberal Group that overstepped their bounds last week should
re-read the Federalist Papers, if they've ever read them in the first place.
Today is also a good day for President Obama and Sec of State John Kerry to
put on their pink bunny suits and go on all the national TV talk shows to
babble about how they created a non-framework, non-deal, between nobody in
Iran to allow the Mullahs to keep on keeping on with their development of a
nuclear bomb. What a joke: a non-Memorandum of
non-Understanding. That's like making a fake verbal deal with Harvey
the Invisible White Rabbit. This current administration is leaning so
far over to the Islamic terrorists in Iran that they have baklava honey and
Yellowcake dripping all over their fingertips. Happy Easter Obama and
Kerry. Go hide those Easter Eggs for all the American kids you're busy
lying to and setting up for a future WW III.
Apr 04, 2015 Well pull up the barn floor and pour yourselves another
hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends. President Obama and Sec of State
John Kerry have just declared that they've struck a "non-deal deal" with the
Turban Terrorists of Iran. Yes, indeedy-doody, a non-written,
non-binding, Memorandum of Non-Understanding with the leading terrorist
nation in the Middle East. What are the imaginary terms of this
imaginary Non Agreement? Whatever either side pretends they want the
non-terms to be or not to be. And that is the question: what the
hell is going on? The answer is: nothing. Actually, the
real answer is: whatever the Mullahs were already doing by lying,
cheating, misleading, trickery, and oooh looky-looky at my right hand while
I shaft you with my left hand. That's what's going on in Iran.
The Mullahs, laughing in their tea at Obama and Kerry, are still
manufacturing Yellowcake, still spinning their centrifuges, and still
planning to crank up a nuclear bomb as soon as possible to destroy Israel
and America. And who says all the centrifuges have to reside in Iran?
The Mullahs could be working in multiple nuclear enrichment facilities in
different countries to add all their Yellowcake together to make a nuke.
Who knows? Certainly not the IAEA. And certainly not Obama and
Kerry. Nobody even knew two months ago about Iran's hidden facility
that is now cranking up Plutonium like there's no tomorrow, which,
ironically is exactly what they're planning on: no tomorrow for you
and me and everybody else. Word on the street is that Sec of State
John Kerry is more interested in winning a Nobel Peace Prize -- temporary as
it will be -- just for inking a "deal" with Iran, which he has yet to do in
his latest Fairytale since nobody has signed off on anything. Obama
continues to claim that he will "veto" any Congressional legislation that
votes "no" on The Big Unwritten Lying Deal With Iran. But that's not
how it works. Treaties can be proposed by the Executive Branch, i.e.
President Jarrett, oops I mean President Obama, but said "Treaty" -- which
must be in writing so somebody can read it -- must be ratified by 2/3 of
each House of Congress. There is no "vetoing" of anything
unless Congress writes a Bill. If
2/3 of Congress tells President Valerie, I mean Barack, to take a long walk
off a short pier, then the so-called "treaty" is nullified. Nor does
the President have the authority to authorize that the UN override the US
Congress regarding America's treaties. Once again, President Obaloney
is trying to not only overstep his executive boundaries, he is obviously
trying to put Israel and other nations at high risk for a WW III when the
Mullahs renege on any non-deal deal that may be created. Currently, Obama has already initiated removing of economic sanctions against Iran
because he and Valerie Jarrett want to go shopping for camel side-saddles
and whatnot in Teheren next summer. Whatever. The point is,
Obama has already jumped the gun on removing sanctions that Congress
previously passed. Did anybody
see the Hollywood propaganda machine in full regalia last night as staged
groups of Iranians drove through the streets cheering and whooping it up as
if a "real deal" had been struck between the US and the Turban Terrorists?
Meanwhile, President Barack Jarrett popped onto national TV and babbled
like a French mime, saying nothing, stating that a non-Framework of a non-Memorandum
of non-Understanding had been not-struck in invisible ink between Nobody and
Harvey the Invisible White Rabbit. And the mainstream news media, like
clockwork, gobbled it up for breakfast. Yum yum yum, nothing but hot
air. Why are we wasting our time in Switzerland playing Tiddly Winks
with the Iranian Terrorists? Because somebody's Daddy was a Muslim.
Apr 02, 2015 The current hullaballoo about Indiana's Religious Rights
legislation that was just signed into law is an attempt by the far left
liberals to destroy the concept of individual rights while pretending that
they are protecting individual rights. There is no such thing as
special individual rights for gays, for women, for blacks, or people with
long purple noses. The concept of inherent individual rights applies
to individuals, not special sects, gangs, or tribes of individuals
delineated by some attribute in addition to, or other than, being an
individual per se. As soon as one attributes an adjective to the
concept of "individuals," they are not individuals in rights philosophy but
rather they are now a special group. One does not obtain inherent
individual rights from Nature or God because one is gay, or because one is a
woman, or because one is Christian, or because one has a long purple nose.
One obtains inherent individual rights because one is an "individual."
Note also that one does not obtain one's rights from the government, rather
the government obtains its existence from the exercise of
a priori inherent individual rights.
Therefore, from a true individual rights philosophy, one has the right to
discriminate against anybody else for whatever reason as long as one does
not initiate the use of physical force or fraud, and one is doing so within
the bounds of one's own private property. Nobody can discriminate
against anybody else on public property, or government property such as down
at the DMV. So, if two KKK members in full white hoods walk into an
African American's bakery and order him to bake them a "We hate black folks"
chocolate cake, the owner of the bakery, regardless of the owner's personal
attributes, has the right under inherent individual rights philosophy to
say, "No, thanks." Similarly, if two gay people walk into a bakery run
by Christians who hold that gay sex is morally reprehensible to the owners,
or for any other reason, and the gay couple demands that the bakers make a
cake portraying a gay marriage on top of the frosting, the owners have the
right to say, "No, thanks." While the owners in the two examples above have
the right to say no, I am not stating that they are exercising a smart
decision or that I agree with their discretion. The owners may lose lots of business and may go bankrupt but that is their
decision. The point is that it is not the function of the government
or other individuals to initiate the use of force or fraud to force the
owners to bake cakes that they do not want to make for any customers for any
reasons, whether religious or racial or gender or the shape of the
customer's nose. Individuals have the inherent right to discriminate,
to choose, for whatever reason whether it's stupidity from somebody else's point of view or not. It may
or may not be intelligent business-wise but it is their
right to choose. So, why all the hullaballoo by the left liberals on this
issue? As usual, the Democrats want to destroy the concept of inherent
individual rights and replace it with government or state force. At
the conceptual level, liberals want to destroy the moral philosophy of
inherent individual rights upon which the US Constitution was founded and
replace it with the concept of tribal rule, gang rule, democratic majority
force and fraud. Instead of the rule of law, they want the rule of
men. The rule of the tribe. It is a veiled attempt to lower
Western Civilization back down to the Dark Ages of state collectivism and
their dirty little secret is that the promulgators of these concepts against
individual rights to discriminate, the right to choose, is to make you feel
guilty. They are pulling their same old stunt of attempting to gain
the sanction of their victims: you. Instead, all individuals
should exercise whatever good judgment their moral philosophy dictates
without, of course, initiating the use of force or fraud against others.
The reason that the free market works is because there are always those who
will gravitate to make exchanges with those whose moral philosophies they
agree with. As an aside, note how those who want to force their views
on others at the bakeries in the above examples are actually carrying out
the very same "discrimination" of which they accuse the bakers.
Republicans, Libertarians, and others need to face this question head on,
and unequivocally point out that all individuals have the inherent right to
"discriminate" in their choice of who they deal with -- which is what
everybody does already in society when they choose their life's work, play
time, and marriage. Democrats and left liberals need to go back to
Moral Philosophy 101A and stop trying to initiate another phony crisis for
our phony President to hide behind while he perpetrates his high crimes and
treason against the US. If some Christian baker doesn't want to bake a
gay themed cake for a couple of gays, that's the baker's right. If a
Jewish baker doesn't want to bake a Nazi-themed cake for a Nazi socialist
couple with a big swastika on top, that's the baker's right to choose.
If an Afro American baker doesn't want to bake a wedding cake for a KKK
couple showing the hanging of a black man on a tree with a burning cross on top, that's the
baker's choice. Moral discrimination is an inherent right.
Period. Case closed. And we don't need a bunch of RINOs in
Washington or at the state governor's level to stand up on national TV and
babble nonsense about how everybody should learn to get along, how they're
going to create special categories of individuals to protect, and sing
cumbayah. By the way, what's this crap about special categories of
hate crime? It's the same claptrap from liberals as discussed above.
It doesn't matter why the crook robbed the 7-Eleven store and shot the
clerk. It is the act of initiating force or fraud against another
individual that matters, not because the victim was black, or Jewish, or a
woman, or had a long purple nose. There should be no special
categories of "hate crimes." A crime against an individual is a crime
against an individual. Period. Get the definitions of your
individual rights philosophy logically correct. And what's this crap about
groups such as Congress' Black Caucus or Latino Caucus or White Caucus or
Purple Nose Caucus which should have no place in government, especially in
Congress? There are no gay rights; or black rights; or women's rights;
or Christian rights. There are only
individual rights and you have the right to choose who you deal
Mar 29 It is sheer folly for the Obama administration to pretend that
it can make a nuclear "deal" with the Mullahs of Iran. First, check
your premises. Axiomatic Primary of Iran's leaders: it is OK to
lie to the infidels. Agreements between infidels are not binding and,
in fact, are suggested ways in which to achieve the objectives of the
Islamic terrorists: i.e., establish an Islamic Caliphate to take over
all of planet Earth. Bonus: blow up the entire planet while
implementing the Islamic Caliphate and -- according to Islamic moral
philosophy -- ensure that one reaches Muslim Heaven, plus 72 virgins, plus
lots of baklava with honey and dates, and... whatever. Therefore --
think about this President Obama -- it is a given premise that NO LOGICAL
RATIONAL DEAL can be made with the Mullahs of Iran because if one's primary
givens are false, then the results must be false. False premises yield
false results. In every field of endeavor, from math to engineering to
social political economic philosophy. The Big Question is: why
does Obama persist in going down an irrational political path? Is he
suicidal? Does he think the Mullahs will love him and spare his ass
when they blow up Israel, America, and planet Earth? What is going
through President Obama's tiny little brain that he can't comprehend that 2
+ 2 = 4 in the realm of social political economics? The answer is that
there is no rational answer because Obama's premises are not rational.
Therefore, he -- whether he knows it consciously or not -- is on a suicidal
mission and he is willing to take the rest of the world with him as he lives
out his short socialist fantasy. Let's face it, Obama is living out a
200 year old economic fairytale called Marxism and he wants to drag the rest
of America with him to discover what we already know: the false
economic sophisms of socialism -- labor theory of value, zero sum wealth,
etc. -- all of which were disproved over a hundred years ago. And
let's also face the fact that Marx's socialist state is the same moral
philosophy as Iran's Mullahs socialist religious state. No wonder it
is so easy for Obama to slip into the same moral philosophy of altruistic
state collectivism of socialism and Islamic terrorism. Both deny the
existence of inherent individual rights, especially women's rights in the
Middle East, and both worship the collectivist state. That explains
why Obama is busy running around America talking up a storm about how
wonderful state collectivism will be in the US, such as socialist medical
care, and simultaneously how he can make a nuclear "deal" with Islamic
terrorist state collectivists in the Middle East. It's the same moral
philosophy: stupid state collectivism. Except for one thing:
Obamacare will not blow up planet Earth; but a fake nuclear "deal" with Iran
will. The only saving grace may be that those who follow Billy Meier
and his human ET contacts, the Plejaran, know that said Plejaran will not
allow the total blowing up of planet Earth with nukes because -- their
words, not mine -- planet Earth happens to exist in a section of one of the
Milky Way Galaxy's spiral arms connected to other human ET's in our
space-time continuum and they would be adversely affected if the Bozos on
Earth actually blew up the entire planet. Short of that, however, the
use of chemical, biological, conventional, and limited nuclear warfare will
be, well, just tough luck for Earth humans and nobody on or off planet will
be coming to our rescue. Let's hope that President Dumb-Dumb gets
impeached before he can do much more harm than he has already done at home
and in the Middle East. So what's the solution? The US and other
nations such as Britain, France, Australia, and Israel need to join together
and simply march into Iran and tell the Iranian leaders to clear out the
scientists from their un-needed "secret" nuclear facilities while said
united nations completely dismantle the Iranian nuclear facilities. No
need to blow up Iranians, they want and have asked for the US to free them
from their Mullahs. If that doesn't happen, if the US leadership and a
coalition of other nations don't step up to the plate with a pair of cajones,
prepare for the unleashing of nuclear bombs by the Islamic terrorists in the
very near future. Remember, it's OK to lie to us infidels, including
lying to President Obama and his Iranian Mommy, Valerie Jarrett, who are
simply regarded as useful idiots in the Mullahs' overall Game Plan to take
over the world. Worse bad news dukie would be the Islamic terrorists
additionally marching into France, and with the five million disenfranchised
jobless Muslims living in the NO GO Zones of Paris, take over France's
military and nuclear arsenal and blow up half of Europe as they implement
their Caliphate throughout Europe. Wake up England, you're next on the
Mullahs' List. Meanwhile, Russia's Putin is licking his chops and is
contemplating how to take over portions of Northern Europe and then Canada
and Alaska while America is going broke trying to fight the Islamic
terrorists in the Middle East. Think it can't happen? Think
again, Americans. Obama the Pied Piper is leading the youth of America
down the path to total economic obliteration. That's why he talks
every day at a different college campus in America: to convince the
stupid youth that Marxism and Islamic terrorism are simply figments of the
Conservatives' imaginations. Meanwhile, the old line Conservatives are
RINOs, scratching their heads, trying to figure out what's going on in the
world in between maintaining their elegant outrageous lifestyle in
Washington DC. Why can't the US Congress spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H?
Mar 26, 2015 News Flash!! The US
Military announced yesterday that PRIVATE Bergdahl has now been charged with
(1) deserting his post on the battle field, and (2) putting his platoon and
the military in harms way when he left his post and went wandering off to
search out a meeting and joining up with Al Qaeda/Taliban/Middle East
terrorists. This was a conscious decision as PRIVATE Bergdahl asked
his Platoon leaders how to pack up and ship his personal belongings home,
which he did, the day before he deserted his post. This was a
conscious decision as PRIVATE Bergdahl voluntarily joined the US Military --
after failing to join the French Foreign Legion -- and then decided that he
didn't like the way the US Military was conducting the war in Iraq.
Not that he was a pacifist; he didn't like the door-to-door meetings and
discussion with the locals. He wanted more action. Not that he
wanted to kill people but that he wanted, according to his Platoon buddies,
more running around the countryside, hopping, skipping, jumping, and
zip-lining all over the place. Maybe he should have joined the
Olympics, who knows. But one doesn't voluntarily join the Army, take
an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States, and then decide on
the battle field to play Commander in Chief -- or more like Benedict Arnold
-- and then dash off to join the enemy while his comrades think he is
standing guard to protect them as they did for him while he slept.
This is not the action of a hero or somebody serving his country with "honor
and distinction" as the Obama Administration claimed on national TV talk
shows. This is the action of a lying coward, and is a court-martial
offense if not a firing squad on the battle field. Kudos to the US
Military for not caving in and playing politics with the Obama
Administration that tried to get the Military top brass to dismiss the
charges and pretend like nothing happened, move along, nothing going on
here. Yeah, uh-huh. The really sad part of this entire Obama
Bergdahl fiasco is that 6 soldiers were killed in the initial search for
Bergdahl as the US Military thought he may have been captured or led off
post. Very shortly, however, they discovered he purposely deserted and
the Taliban was, with Bergdahl's help, tricking our soldiers who were trying
to save him by leading them into houses that blew up and ambushes in which
our soldiers were killed. All this, as President Obama choreographed a
phony baloney Rose Garden charade during which he hugged, kissed, and put
his arms around Bergdahl's parents when Obama announced his Big Trade to
bring Berdahl home in exchange for releasing the five worst terrorist
commanders at Gitmo so they could then go back into the Middle East fight
against Israel, America, and anybody else they targeted. This was
probably one of the most shameful acts of treason and showboating by any US
Commander in Chief, ever, in US history. And to top it off, Bergdahl's
father stood in the Rose Garden, speaking in Arabic, and praised his son's
despicable act of desertion as President Obama -- the Commander in Chief --
smiled on like it was some kind of birthday party for a two year old.
On the first count, Bergdahl could get five years in prison. On the
second count, he could get life in prison. Nobody at the White House
mentioned the 6 soldiers who died searching for Bergdahl. They will
not be coming home -- except in a coffin.
Mar 24, 2015 Tum tee tum tum twiddle thumbs. What is Hilarious
Clinton waiting for? She's finished as a candidate for the 2016
presidency. She should be duly prosecuted for her blatant violation of
security protocol vis a vis running her Sec of State communications in the
clear on her own hackable private servers at her home instead of on the
official more secure servers mandated by the government. Congressional
Democrats are no doubt sitting in their back offices smoking Cuban cigars
and drinking fine Scotch whiskey as they plan how exactly to dump her and
choose another one or two candidates to run in the 2016 Presidential
Elections. It's over, Hillbilly. It's over. The sooner you
wake up and admit this to yourself, the sooner you can take a long vacation
to Sing-Sing Prison after your federal conviction and talk trash with all
the other inmates who only robbed a 7-Eleven store instead of putting the
entire US population at risk with your buddy President Obama. Speaking
of Obama, have you stopped to ask yourself: is he going to throw you
under the bus before you throw him under the bus? Now's there's a
political wrestling match that the public deserves to see on national TV.
If you do nothing, Obama wins and you lose anyway. If you squeal on
him, you both lose but you may be granted immunity for a coupla weeks as you
tell the truth about what the hell the President and his Puppet Master
Valerie Jarrett from Iran have been orchestrating over the past 6 years or
more. Just think, girl friend, you have a chance to redeem yourself.
Well, sort of. But not enough to think you can then run for the 2016
presidency. Nope, that option is long gone. And, guess what, you
get to help drag President Obama through his impeachment proceedings in the
House and then trial in the Senate. All you have to do is to stop your
Big Denial because even the left Liberal Progressives in Congress are not
going to let you continue to get away with... what?... murder...?
treason...? gun running...? what? who knows? Why not come
clean now instead of being forced to make a fool of yourself on public TV
during all the Congressional hearings? Tum tee tum tum twiddle
thumbs... Just waiting...
Mar 19, 2015 Once again, President Obama demonstrates that he does not
understand the concept of "inherent individual rights." Yesterday,
while on his perpetual never-ending forever-and-ever campaign trail, Obama
said it should be a requirement that every citizen be forced to vote.
Really? Forced to vote? What part of the word FREEDOM does
President Obama not understand? Freedom means choice. It means
the choice to vote or not to vote. If the government
can force you to vote, then it can force you to do anything because to
accept the proposition of no inherent individual right of choice in one
endeavor is to accept the proposition of no inherent individual right
of choice in any other endeavor. Such as freedom of speech, freedom of
association, freedom of religion, freedom of you name it. Plus, the
concept of "inherent" means you don't get your inherent individual rights
from a government; you get it by the mere fact of being born, or of
conception at some point in that process. Forcing citizens to vote is
the same as forcing citizens to, hey, how about purchasing a government
health care program? Wowie zowie! What a coincidence.
Obama The Messiah has already tried to shove a forced GOVERNMENT health
care program down everybody's throats. Force is not the answer to
obtaining the best, cheapest, most comprehensive health care system.
Inherent individual rights, a true free market, not the fake free market
that existed before Obamacare, is the correct route to go. We need to
"force" every American to vote like we need another hole in our heads.
Go back to sleep, Obama, you still don't get it, dude. Better yet, why
not retire before you get impeached?
Mar 19, 2015 News Flash!! BiBi
Netanyahu kicks derriere in Israeli election for Prime Minister.
Despite all the efforts by the Obama Administration to politically sabotage
the Israeli elections, Benjamin Netanyahu won a landslide victory to
continue as Israel's PM for the next two years. The very issue that
President Obama accused Netanyahu and the US Congress of doing, namely
involving themselves in the election process of a foreign government by
asking Netanyahu to come speak to the US Congress and American people
regarding the Bad Deal that Obama was about to enter into with Iran vis a
vis granting Iran a clear path to obtaining nukes, is EXACTLY what Obama and
his cohorts did themselves by DIRECTLY involving themselves into the
election process in Israel last week. I mean, Obama's thugs showed up
to Israel and openly campaigned against Bibi Netanyahu. Too bad for
Obama that his obvious intervention in Israel's election process backfired
and actually boosted the votes FOR Netanyahu because even "Liberals" in
Israel understand that any deal with Iran is a joke and Israel's life
depends upon it. In typical Obama style, he continually does exactly
what he accuses his opponents of doing. He plays the race card while
accusing others of being racist. He claims he has no constitutional
authority to allow illegal immigrants into the United States while issuing
EOs and Memo to allow 5 million to 10 million illegal immigrants to storm
across our southern border, receive entitlements, and transport said
illegals to live in suburbs all over America. And so it goes, on and
on, President Obama doing exactly what he accuses his opponents of doing.
Why? To keep the citizens of America CONTINUALLY wrapped up in all
kinds of concocted civil strife. Just when you think you've caught
President Obama creating one issue of civil strife, his administration
creates another issue. It just keeps going on and on AND THIS IS NO
ACCIDENT. This is the guerilla warfare he learned from his communist
teachers, right out of the Saul Alinsky Playbook on How To Rip Down A
Nation. And it works, up to a point, depending on how soon the victims
discover what is happening to them, what is really going on behind the
scenes. Add to that, we have a President and his puppet masters such
as Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian Islamic terrorist sympathizer, pushing Obama
in the direction of supporting the Islamic fanatics raging all over the
Middle East slitting people's throats and burning them alive. Not to
mention openly selling women and girls as sex slaves in various Middle East
markets. So where are all the Left Liberal Progressive Democrats in
the US, not standing up for women's rights? Why don't they question
President Obama's foreign policies that support such abhorrent sex slavery
behavior? Because they only think in terms of disconnected thought
globs and that is why you see every major news outlet wringing their hands
and bemoaning their grief about Bibi Netanyahu winning by a landslide the
office of PM in Israel yesterday. Democrats are incapable of
connecting a rational thought process of what Obama is doing to America and
what is going on in the Middle East. That's why Obama did not -- and
perhaps may never -- call Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu and offer
congratulations on winning the election that Obama tried through direct
intervention to make Bibi lose. Shameful. Say, Valerie Jarrett,
how's it going, babe? Is your puppet falling down? Is Hillary
clipping your strings?
Mar 18, 2015 Hesto presto! Hillary Clinton did not sign Form
OF-109, as mandated by law, when she left her job as Sec of State. Or,
at least nobody at the State Dept can find it. Therefore, Ms. Clinton,
for two years has violated her exit stage left. Wait, claims the State
Dept. The State Dept has claimed that they also cannot find signed
Form OF-109 for the previous two Secs of State, Candy Cane Rice and Gen
Colin Powell, too. Whoa, so if two previous Secs of State have missing
forms, then it's OK for Hilarious Clinton to not have signed her OF-109
form, too? What if the previous two Secs of State robbed Bank of
America? Is it then OK for former Sec of State Clinton to rob Bank of
America, too? The more people who commit a crime, the less of a crime
it becomes? Let's stick to the point. Hillary Clinton ran all
State Dept communications on her private server, which is a violation of
national security because her server could be hacked by foreign intelligence
agents. Her server was not a secure line. Ms. Clinton mixed
classified communications with private communications. A big no-no in
the intelligence community. Ms. Clinton willfully chose and destroyed
whatever emails and other State Dept communications she desired. All
of the above are felonies and she should be dutifully prosecuted. But
here's the coup de grace: He or She who violates the provisions of
form OF-109, including failure to sign said form, can not only be fined and
sent to prison, DUM DA DUM, pay close attention now: THEY CANNOT HOLD
ANY FUTURE PUBLIC OFFICE. Period. Zip. Zero. End of
story. So, even if Secs of State Colin Powell and Condaleeza Rice did
not sign form OF-109, that doesn't let Hillary Clinton off the hook.
It simply means the law applies to Powell and Rice, too. In fact,
doubly so because the Sec of State is in charge of making sure this law is
carried out. Period. Zip. Zero. End of those guys'
stories, too. So, which laws do Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and
anybody else in government service get to break? How about election
laws? How about just suspending the Bill of Rights? How about
quartering soldiers in people's houses? Where does it stop? Is
the excuse, "I just thought it didn't apply to me," OK?
or, "I just thought it would be more convenient if I did it my way," an OK
reason? The US government, especially the Executive Branch with
Valerie Jarrett running Obama like a puppet and Hillary Clinton doing
anything she feels like doing, has turned into a completely lawless joke.
If Hillary Clinton is not prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and if
President Obama is not impeached for breaking every law imaginable, then the
United States is no longer a Union, no longer a Republic, not longer a
nation of laws. Rather America has turned into a hodge-podge of tribal
mob rule. Rule by whoever carries the biggest gun. What a giant
step backwards in social political economics that would be. Ayn Rand
was absolutely correct in her assessment of the cause of America's
continuing downfall: altruistic state collectivism carried to its
logical ultimate result, individual and national suicide. Moral
philosophy does matter, and we are watching it erode into Atlas Shrugged
right before our eyes.
Mar 14, 2015 FOX TV News talk show host Megyn Kelly has filed a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain one simple form from the US
State Dept: Hillary Clinton's OF-109 form which Hillary was mandated
by federal law to sign when she left her job as Sec of State two years ago.
Form OF-109 states under penalty of perjury that Ms. Clinton must sign off
that she turned over ALL of her communications -- public and private -- to
the State Dept upon leaving and the State Dept will then determine which
communications, including emails, belong to the federal government and which
communications can be taken home by Ms. Clinton. Ms. Clinton has
already publicly stated that she did not use a government server or computer
during her entire four year term as Sec of State and that she only used her
private DOT.com communications system. That's it, just one document
being requested by FOX News host Megyn Kelly: namely, Hillary
Clinton's OF-109 form. If Hillary did not sign a OF-109 form upon
retiring from her Sec of State post, she and the US Dept of State are in
serious trouble. If Hillary did indeed sign a OF-109 form upon
retiring from her Sec of State post, then the Big Question is: where
are all of her documents? Did she destroy any of them? If so,
can they be recovered from either Hillary's private server or from
recipients of her communications? Were any of her communications
classified documents? Did she communicate and then destroy any
classified documents with President Obama's White House administration?
Either way, Hillary Clinton is in deep trouble because she apparently
willfully broke the law and that spells
F-E-L-O-N-Y... one felony count for each missing document... . And
there are apparently tens of thousands of documents involved in this
debacle. That's a long time in prison for an arrogant, "Oh yeah, I
just thought it was more 'convenient' to do everything on my own private
server... you know, in case I needed to hide anything I didn't want the
public to know about... ." Really? LIke what? Like gun
running with Obama to Al Qaeda terrorists that went awry in Benghazi, Libya
and Syria, and resulted in the murder of our Libyan ambassador and three
other people, not to mention the terrorists obtaining a billion dollars
worth of American high tech weapons? And then lying about it by
blaming some idiot Hollywood Youtube video making fun of Mohammed?
Aiding Al Qaeda terrorists to fight Syrian terrorists and other groups could
be construed as a treasonous act by President Obama and Sec of State
Clinton. Watch how fast Hillary drags down Obama as she goes down in
this debacle. No honor among thieves, right? Let's all sing
together, "Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for me..."
Mar 12, 2015 Ah yes, Government Form OF-109. That's the official
form that former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton was supposed to have signed
upon leaving her government position two years ago. The form says,
"Hey, bureaucrat, under penalty of perjury, you have to sign on the dotted
line that you have given us (the government) all your communications,
including emails, that you handled during your tenure as such-and-such a
government employee. And if you willfully refuse to do so, then you
are committing a felony and can go to prison. And, in addition, we
(the government) are the ones -- not you, former Sec of State Hillbilly
Clinton -- who get to decide what communications you can take with you and
which ones you cannot." If Hilarious Clinton did not sign Form OF-109
upon leaving her Sec of State job and for two years thereafter, then she and
others at the State Dept have committed a crime. If Hillbilly Clinton
did sign Form OF-109, then the Big Question is: so where are all the
communications that you were supposed to turn over to the State Dept?
What? Zero? Let me get this straight. Former Sec of State
Ha-Ha Clinton worked for the State Dept as a Cabinet Member for President
Barack Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong and during all those four years neither
Clinton nor Obama sent any classified communications to each other?
Remember, Clinton only used her home-grown servers and computers for her
emails and communication. Clinton has admitted that she did not use
any government secured communications equipment because it was "more
convenient" that way. Yeah, I bet it was. Especially if one had
something to hide. Like Benghazi crap that she and Obama do not want
the world to know about. There were no emails between the White House
and Sec of State for months -- that's months, unbelievable -- during the
Benghazi crisis and aftermath. She sent nothing to Obama during this
time? And he sent nothing to her? Really? So what
messages was she sending? Communications is not just a one way street.
Clinton was not talking to herself. She was talking to President Obama.
And he must have sent messages to her. Wow. What a revelation.
Imagine, the President of the United States actually talking to his Sec of
State. Who'd a thunk? So..... where are all the messages,
Hillary? Barack? Classified and not classified? Oh....
Hilarious Clinton deleted the ones she thought should be deleted and kept
the ones she thought were OK to keep on her personal non-government server,
whether said messages were classified or not? Is there a new country
existing inside the United States called Clintononia, with Dictator Hillary
running her own show? Is that how it works in Washington? Is
there another nation within America called Barack-a-rama-Obama in which
Dictator Obama gets to do anything he wants and is exempt from the US
Constitution, checks and balances from the real government and the other two
branches, the Legislative and Judicial Branch? Is that how it all
works? Holy Moley, they taught us all wrong in Jr. Civics Class in the
8th Grade, right? There is no United States of America and no Sec of
State. It's everybody for themselves, whatever they think is best or
gives them the most power, and the law be damned because that's exactly what
is now going on in Washington DC, with Obama doing anything and everything
he wants, and same for Hilarious Clinton, and God only knows who else in our
government is just doing whatever the hell they want to do and making up
phony stories to cover their own asses when they get caught breaking the
law. What law? Whose law? The rule of law seems to be
gone. Now it's the Rule of Men... and, apparently, women. Unless
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama do not get away with it. The Founding
Fathers created the remedy for both situations: Obama, when it's
finally discovered that he has broken many different laws can be impeached
by Congress and former Sec of State Clinton can be taken to federal court
and then prison for felonious crimes she committed during her tenure.
Never mind Hilarious running for Obama's job in 2016; she will be lucky if
she doesn't spend the rest of her life at Sing-Sing for placing the security
of the United States at high risk. Time for the US Congress and the
Judicial Branch to develop a pair of gonads and implement the law against
our nation's Top Two Laurel and Hardies: Baloney Obama and Hilarious
Mar 08, 2015 Yo, Mr. President, what color is your turban?
President Obama's recent refusal to meet with Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu during Netanyahu's visit to speak to a joint session of
Congress last week revealed many things. The first thing it revealed
is that Obama did not want Congress or the American people to know ANYTHING
about his (Obama's) ridiculous nuclear arms deal with the Mullahs of Iran.
That's right, nuclear arms. Iran needs a nuclear power plant like they
need more desert sand. They're sitting on millions of barrels of oil.
Or, if they really are Greenies and are trying to save planet Earth from the
pollution of non-replaceable fossil fuels, they can implement Tesla's free
energy from the vacuum (space all around us), which is currently available
today from many different sources. There is only one reason for Iran
to pursue an increase in their capability to produce nuclear grade
yellowcake: so they can do what they've been preaching for the last
several decades, namely, to
wipe Israel and the United States off the face of the Earth. Holy
mackerel, President Obama, you mean Iran is off and running on some type of Islamic Jihad
against the rest of the world? Yeah, you betchum. They've said
so. Over and over and over. But Obama either thinks he can control Iran's Mullahs because he
thinks he's Jesus Christ Mohammed and Buddha reincarnated and all rolled
into one, or he thinks he's the swiftest most intellectual neighborhood
negotiator in the whole wide world. Uh-huh. Actually Obama is
acting more like an Islamic Bozo acting on Iran's behalf. Which side
of the Table is he sitting on? What is the color of Obama's turban? The second thing that
Mr. Obama's reaction to Netanyahu's speech before Congress revealed is that
Obama thinks he can legally make foreign treaties without the US Congress.
Beep-beep, wrong! Since when does the US Constitution grant the
Executive Branch the authority to make secret treaties with other nations?
It doesn't. Then again, when has that ever stopped President Obama on
his dictatorial stampede to unilaterally take over all three branches of US
government? To date, he has taken over GM, taken over the US health
care system, taken over the US Immigration system for his future 10 million
to 20 million new Democratic voters, taken over the 2nd Amendment to deny
Americans bullets for their guns and right to bear arms, taken over local,
state, and national judicial systems to issue "legal" results opposite to
what grand juries have already ruled, taken over the exchange of war
criminals for army deserters without consulting Congress, taken over the running of guns in
secretly botched up deals with Mexico and Islamic terrorists in the Middle
East, pretended to have captured, shot and killed, and secretly buried at
sea World Trade Center terrorist Osama bin Laden, and now he wants to grant
-- yes, GRANT -- Iran the right to keep on creating more and more nuclear
grade material so the biggest sponsor of Islamic terrorism in the world can
take out Israel and America. Not only does Obama's Iran deal allow
them to create more fissionable material, after 10 years all restrictions
on Iran are slated to be abolished which allows Iran full, unrestricted
capability to do whatever they want to do vis a vis their nuclear
activities. Ten years. Wow what a brilliant negotiator Barack
Obama is. I wouldn't send him anywhere to negotiate how to get a mouse out
of a wet paper bag with ten tons of cheese. I'm sure he would "eff"
that up, too. The third thing revealed by President Obama's "furious
reaction" to Netanyahu's speech before Congress is Obama's assertion that a
foreign dignitary running for office back in his own nation in two weeks
somehow disqualifies him from speaking to the Congress or Parliament of
another nation. Really? Especially concerning something so time sensitive as Bozo Brain Obama
making a nuke deal with said foreign visitor's next door enemy whose
"treaty" includes how to wipe Netanyahu's country off the face of the
Earth in ten years or less. Obama is simply throwing out a straw man to demolish.
Nobody in the US can vote for Israeli PM Netanyahu anyway -- except for two
people living in New York who may have dual citizenships. Wow, big
voting block. Once again, methinks President Obama doth too much
protesteth regarding Israel's PM Netanyahu speaking before Congress.
What's Obama got to hide from Congress and the American people? Why is
he so nasty to PM Benjamin Netanyahu? What color is your turban, Mr.
Mar 07, 2015 President Obama and the DOJ proved they were die-hard
racists yesterday as Obama and AG Eric Holder -- while admitting that the
DOJ investigation, grand jury, and all investigative information related to
the Ferguson case in which police officer Darren Wilson was acquitted by
self defense of shooting and killing Bad Boy What'shisname -- continued to
speak to audiences, mostly black, that Officer Wilson somehow got off on a
technicality because Obama and Holder just know, deep in their hearts, that
white racism is just running rampant all across America. Buzz, wrong,
Mr. President and AG Holder. What the DOJ investigation just showed
was that white racism IS NOT only not running rampant in America, but that
it isn't even dribbling across the sidewalks anywhere in the US. The
only racism we see today is President Obama and AG Eric Holder lying through
their teeth on national TV. Mr. Obama and Eric Holder must be living
in an alternate universe, like back in the 1960's, because over the last 50
years everybody with a pair of eyeballs can see that racism is over,
finished, deader 'n a doornail... well, except for those who are still
trying to make a business out of it, like The Right Reverend Holy Roller Al
Sharpton and Jesse Jackson who are still running around jacking up
businesses for guilt money. It's called extortion. At least
"guilt" for those businesses whose CEOs are stupid enough to fall for this
obvious scam. The problem with President Obama and AG Eric Holder,
however, is that their actions are an attempt to dump, discredit, and ignore
America's rule of law and substitute it with the rule of men. Which
men? Why, whoever is currently in power in the Executive Branch of
government. As France has recently discovered, no nation can survive
with two sets of jurisprudence: French law and Sharia Islamic law, the
latter now being practiced in the No Go Zones in France. Similarly,
President Obama's continual babblings about how he thinks racism is running
rampant across America is a blatant attempt to destroy America's judicial
system and replace it -- as we keep pointing out -- with his social
political economic view of tribalist Marxism. This, of course, is the
result of Obama's thorough brainwashing in altruistic state collectivism --
socialism, communism, fascism, Islamic tribalism -- that he learned all
through his youth. Nor does he seem capable of intellectually
understanding why his premises are ridiculous, contradictory, and false.
Hence his oft-quoted phrase that his goal is to "fundamentally change
America." By "fundamental" he means he thinks you get your rights from
the government, rather than the government gets its existence from
inherently free individuals who consciously chose to establish not a
democracy but a limited constitutional republic with a rule of law, not
Divine Right of Kings, or the current President of the United States.
Obama and his administration -- hi, ya, Valerie Jarrett, how're you doing
today -- think that it is their duty to dismantle our limited republic --
along with your inherent individual rights and responsibilities -- and
replace it with the Rule of Men, men with the biggest guns, men with the
most power. To this goal, they purposely create crisis after crisis
after crisis and then take illegal actions to "solve" -- ha ha, "solve" --
their self created crises. Lenin, Stalin, Adolph, and Mao would be
proud of Obama and Holder. This is about as low a level of intellectual
non-thinking that an individual can stoop to, and that's exactly where our
current president and his administration are at.
Mar 06, 2015 News Flash! Bye-bye, Hillary Clinton. As the
song said, "Good night, sweetheart, well it's time to go..." After
discovering that former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton spent her entire
tenure as Sec of State using her own personal email system installed at her
home to perform government business, much of it obviously classified
communications, the US House led by Rep Trey Gowdy is now investigating how
is it that she thought her actions were legal. Sec of State Clinton
obviously had security clearances at the highest levels, same as President
Obama -- and, by the way, the same as I had when I worked with SSD, ACSI,
Special Security Detachment, Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, in the
Pentagon and MACV HQ in Saigon, helping to prepare intelligence briefs for
the President, Sec of Defense, and the Chief of Staff. So how is it
that she thought it was OK to do all of her communications work on a
non-government, non-secured network? If I had taken any type of
classified documents out of our cypher-locked, leaded comm lines top secret
crypto eyes only vault at the Pentagon or MACV HQ in Saigon, I would have
been court-martialed faster than a New York minute. Nor was I allowed
to discuss anything about my job down at the cafeteria or anywhere else.
So how is it that Sec of State Hillbilly Clinton conducted her duties on
insecure email networks? And where does she get off claiming that she
is the one who gets to decide what she thinks is classified and not
classified communications that she can send in the clear? What are we
to conclude about what is going on here? We can speculate that, since
Hillary had her "secret" network installed one week before being called
before the Benghazi Investigative Committee in the House, perhaps she did it
knowingly in order to pick and choose, to hide, whatever Benghazi
communications she wanted to cover up. Did any of these alleged
communications come from or go to the White House? Anywhere else?
We already know that the Benghazi Embassy bombings and murders were a cover
up by the Obama Administration for gun running to Al Qaeda terrorists that
went awry when half the billion dollars in payment and weapons were diverted
to other terrorists. Somebody at the White House probably said, "Stand
down," and if I had to guess, my guess is that some of Clinton's
communications may have talked about this information. If this is
true, and if Hilarious Clinton has deleted or in any other way covered up
this information, she is facing prison time at the Big House on The Rock:
dum-da-dum, Alcatraz. I think Hillary would look good in blue and black
prison dresses, and sometimes if the light is shining just right, the dress
colors may change to white and gold. At any rate, it appears that the
left Liberal Progressives will soon throw her chances to run for President
in 2016 under the bus down at the corner of Walk and Don't Walk.
Especially since we also just discovered that the billion dollar Clinton
Foundation has been receiving millions of dollars in illegal donations from
nations such as Saudi Arabia while Ho Ho Hillary was Sec of State. Tisk, tisk, that's a conflict of interest, my dear. And Bill, who
obviously doesn't get his cookies off with Hilarious, has been seen -- and
logged onto air flights -- at Orgy Island with billionaire convicted
pedophile Jeffery Whomever, an entourage that includes Prince Albert of
England, for hot dates with under-aged teeny boppers. How did the
Clinton Clan ever get this far in politics? Welcome to the moral
philosophical premises of the average Democrat: total disconnected
thought globs of irrational gobble-dee-gook. And President Barack
Obama is cut from the same cloth, if not worse. Look for Hilarious
Clinton, once she finally realizes that she's not getting out of this mess,
to spill whatever beans she has on Nowhere Man Obama and bring him down,
too. Why should she lose out on being the first woman president and
take the fall for the Islamic Trojan Horse playing golf at the White House?
Nothing like a good presidential impeachment to liven up the party, I always
Mar 01, 2015 Shut up, pull up the barn floor, and listen up, girl
friends. Pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. Next
week is going to be a very busy week. The US Congress passed a budget
for the Dept of Homeland Security that expires in one week. After
which, we get to see whether the House has the cajones to pass another
budget that funds the necessary agencies within DHS while exempting funding
for Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong's illegal Executive Order amnesty for 5
million border busters, which we all know will actually morph into an
amnesty for 10 million to 20 million illegal immigrants two weeks later.
Number 2, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will show up this week
to talk to the US Congress under huge protest from, once again, you guessed
it: Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong. Why is Obama-alphabet-ding-dong
protesting Netanyahu's speech before Congress? Because Netanyahu is
going to rail against Obama's Neville Chamberlain moment: namely,
Obama's absurd attempt to make a deal with Iran in which Obama -- and,
therefore, America and Israel and the entire planet Earth -- will be taken
to the nuclear cleaners. Obama proposes to remove economic sanctions
against Iran and give them lots more time to finish creating a nuclear bomb
-- oh, excuse me, peaceful nuclear energy, sorry. Yeah, "Islam"
doesn't mean "submission," it means "Green Peace." Uh-huh. And the
Islamic terrorists -- headquartered in Teheran, Iran -- are not hell bent on
destroying Israel, America, and the entire planet if necessary, in the name
of an anthropomorphic, nonexistent omniscient who they fantasize is dangling
72 virgins as a reward after death for the Islamic terrorists. The 72
virgins fairytale is worse than the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus Fairytales.
At least in the Easter Bunny Fairytale, little children get to run around
and search for colorful eggs hidden by some rabbit in the grass, and Santa
Claus gets to slide down chimneys to deliver presents to people.
Nothing too sinister about a moral philosophy that contains the Fat Man and
the Rabbit fairytales. But no moral philosophy should contain a
fairytale about getting to screw 72 virgins and throw rocks at women if you
blow up planet Earth. C'mon. Let's get reasonable here.
And yet, President Obama wants to play, "Let's Make a Deal," with the
Mullahs in Iran, betting the entire North American continent, Israel, and
all the inhabitants of the rest of the known world on his, "Yeah, man, I got
a hunch the Iranians are gonna tell us the truth and let us inspect their
building of peaceful nuclear power plants," said Adolph Hitler to Lord
Chamberlain at the Munich Agreements in 1938 just before invading Prague and
the entire Czech nation to start WW II. Thanks Obama, you're a real
genius of a neighborhood negotiator. Reminds me of the children's TV
show, Mr. Rogers in the Neighborhood. Tra-la-la-la-la. Hi ya,
kids. Let's play: Be the first kid on your block to rule the
world. Back to our upcoming busy week. Number three, the US
Supreme Court is slated to hear the arguments by 26 states that are suing
the Obama Administration over its illegal implementation of Obamacare.
Here's a Big Chance for Chief Justice John Roberts to make amends to the
American public by doing what he failed to do the first time that Obamacare
came before the Supreme Court: VOTE NO ON OBAMACARE. It is
patently illegal at all levels of rational and constitutional analysis.
It was presented under admitted false pretenses by MIT economic village
idiot Professor John Gruber, and is being implemented by whatever EO's and
special favors that Obama has declared like John Luc Picard on Star Trek,
"Make it so." Then he, Obama, waves his magic wand and saunters off to
play another 18 rounds of golf in Palm Springs while Americans are losing
their doctors, their health care, and being beheaded in the Middle East.
In his last Big Chance, Chief Justice Roberts folded like a wet paper napkin
and voted YES that Obamacare was constitutional -- after previously arguing
for 4 hours that it wasn't -- and added insult to injury by injecting new
imaginary paragraphs into Obamacare that said Obamacare contained "taxes" --
which were not mentioned in the 3,000 page Obamacare legislation -- not
"fines" and, thus, reasoned Justice Roberts the nonexistent "taxes" clause
was legal and, therefore, Obamacare was legal. I mean, did Michelle
Obama hold a gun to Chief Justice Robert's head? Did the Obama
administration threaten to kidnap Roberts' children or what? We may
never know. But Roberts' 5-4 first decision on Obamacare was probably
the most disastrous decision ever made against the US economy and inherent
individual rights by a Supreme Court Justice... EVER. The
ramifications of Roberts' decision, if not rescinded, threaten to
"fundamentally change" the entire constitution and economy of the United
States, turning it away from individual rights and freedoms to a dictatorial
fascist state, dragging all the other executive agencies such as the IRS,
EPA, FCC, FDA, ATF and other alphabet soup of federal bureaucracies into
Obama's version of the future American Caliphate. Have a nice week.
-- Mon Feb 23,
2015 Ah yes, the 2015 Oscars last night! What a joke. The
Best Movie and Best Director of the year should have overwhelmingly been
American Sniper, just from the box office receipts alone. But no, of
course not, because politically Conservative director Clint Eastwood who
directed a thoughtful movie about the life of an American soldier protecting
his fellow combat troops in the Middle East was outvoted by the politically
Democratic socialists in Hollywood. However, the last laugh will be by
Clint Eastwood all the way to the bank as his movie
American Sniper grossed
nearly one half of the entire box office receipts for the last year, far
outstripping the individual box office receipts of every movie that the
Hollywood fascists voted for. And that tells the real story: the
majority of American theatre goers agree with Clint Eastwood and the
American Sniper. The movie
Selma, a dredging up of civil rights
marches and standard cliches of the 1960's integration struggle, won best
song. Whoop-tee-doo. Hollywood touchy feely left Liberals may
feel guilty for that which happened 50 years ago but most American youths
were not alive then and do not see racial integration as relevant in their
daily living of today. African Americans have excelled in sports,
music, acting, business, medicine and in every endeavor in America and
everybody can see it. Only the current administration in Washington
and guilt-ridden Hollywood actors and actresses are playing the race card
because they don't know that racism is over, finished, dead, and oh so
yesterday. Civil rights is not on young people's minds in this
century. Obamacare, economics, no jobs, illegal immigrants storming
over the border, and the Middle East War are the concerns of today, not
civil rights 50 years ago in Selma, Alabama. Over all, the 2015 Oscar
Night was a flop and a half. The EMCEE was not funny and made many
ridiculous statements and insinuations about everything from gay rights to
showing up in nothing but his underwear, socks, and shoes -- some type of
slap stick comedy that only 10 year old children might think was funny.
Nobody else with a brain did. And everybody was supposed to hold their
breath and not pee their pants in anticipation of some singer called "Lady
Gaga." Wow. If Lady Gaga was supposed to be the highlight of the
2015 Oscar Night, we can all hang it up and not bother to tune into the 2016
Oscars, because if it's anything like the 2015 Oscars you would do better
watching old re-runs of Butt Head and Beavis, which is about the
intellectual level of the writers for the 2015 Oscars. And now, the
winner of the Best Idiot Running Around on Stage in His Jockey Shorts Trying
to Get Laughs from 5 Year Olds... . Ho hum, Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z. Rating:
1/2 of a Popcorn Bag. By the way, as an aside, the film with the most
important political message was not Selma,
it was the Imitation Game.
Americans should realize how important it was for the British and Allies to
break the German cipher code of the Enigma Machine -- as shown in the
Imitation Game -- because if they didn't,
you would be speaking Nazi German today -- if you survived the Third Reich's
genocide, especially blacks, Jews, and other non-Aryan looking individuals.
And we are faced with the same prospect today with the Islamic Caliphate
breathing down our necks with a President and administration saying,
"Islamic terrorism, what's Islamic terrorism?" Pay attention: history is about to
repeat itself, but with possibly far more tragic results.
Feb 19, 2015 President Barack Obama held a Conference on the subject
of Islam over the last two days to try to convince America and the world
that the moral philosophy in the latest version of the Islamic Koran is A-OK
and that it has simply been mis-interpreted and hijacked by wierdo
terrorists who are murdering people all over the world. He also claims
that Islamic terrorists have become terrorists because they need a job.
Really? How droll. His second claim is almost true in that the
nations of Europe where there are No-Go Islamic Zones operating under Sharia
Law are socialist nations in which Islamists are excluded from work because
they are not brothers or sisters or aunts or uncles or buddies of the ruling
socialist bureaucrats in said socialist nations and thus are living on
welfare in those countries. These Islamists have not been integrated
into the work force of their host nations because there is no free market.
Thus they glom together in Islamic unemployment ghettoes of No Go Zones,
shooting at any "infidels" who happen to wander into such Zones, including
the local cops. However,
this simply proves a point against Obama's own political ideology of
altruistic state collectivism (socialism) that he is trying to implement in
America. Socialism has no real jobs; it's just a giant welfare state.
So he is arguing against himself and his own policies regarding his stated
reason for Islamists becoming terrorists: lack of jobs, which his own
policies are bringing about in America today. However, on the first
point, the question remains: does the moral philosophy of Islam
contain the basic premises for terrorism against other religions and
ethnicities? That is, are the basic tenets of Islam itself to blame -- never mind the deranged
or fairytale portions of
Islam that the supposed "hijackers" of a so-called "peaceful" religion
are claiming, such as killing "infidels," and the scoring of a hot date
after death with "72 virgins" clause?" President Obama seems to
conclude (unwittingly) that Islam does contain such tenets as
he compared Christianity to Islam on national TV and said that Christians
should "get off their high horses" because they are just as bad as Islamists
for all the nasty deeds Christians did in the Inquisition and Crusades a
thousand years ago. If he was not saying both religions were equally "bad,"
then why did he make the comparison in the first place and then scold all
the Christians in the audience at the National Prayer Breakfast? He
wasn't simply saying Islam was good and great, but rather that Christianity was
just as bad as Islam by
making the comparison. He was -- again, unwittingly, as he is wont to
do -- stating that both religions had a lousy historical record of
atrocities committed against each other and against other people in general.
He even stated that the terrorism or "sin" is inherent in each religion,
insinuating or concluding that that somehow makes both moral philosophies --
bad as they both are, he insinuates -- OK. It's a lot like a
six-year-old saying to his parents, "But Mom, Johnny stole some cookies
at the grocery store, too," meaning, "just like I did. So that
makes it OK, right Mom?" That's how a little child reasons, until they
learn better. Two wrongs don't make a right. One child's bad
deed is not exonerated by his friend little Johnny's same bad deed, or as
President Obama was really saying at the National Prayer Breakfast,
Christianity is just as bad as Islam, so "get off your high horses" all you
Christians out there trying to blame Islamic terrorism on the religion of
Islam, just like I (Barack Obama) just blamed Christianity for the
Inquisition and the Crusades. Duh, you can't have it both ways, Obama.
Either you is, or you ain't, that is, blaming both religions as bad and thus
that makes them both OK. Rather contradictory, of course, but what
else is new with the Obama Administration? As an aside, many
Christians claim that the Crusades that occurred a thousand years ago were
actually acts of self-defense and thus justified since the Islamists back
then had marched all over the Mediterranean and Europe taking land, and
raping and pillaging. The Christian Crusaders, they claim, were just
trying to reclaim their cookies. Because Obama keeps going on and on
about how terrorism is not inherent in the moral philosophy of Islam, let me
quote William Shakespeare, "Me thinks thou dost too much protesteth,"
meaning that when somebody protests wayyyyy too much in the defense of an
issue, there is often
a grain of truth in the initial accusation. I.e., perhaps Islam is --
at its root premises --
inherently violent, especially against other religions and ethnicities.
After all, the word Islam, according to many Muslims, does not mean "peace." It means
"submission," which is exactly what the Islamic terrorists are shouting as
they slit people's throats, burn others to death, call Jews in Israel
"little Satans" and everybody in America "big Satans." I don't see how
much more immorality -- philosophically speaking -- one can reveal about their religion than
"submission" of one group to another and calling others "satanic."
Islam certainly does not seem to respect the concept of inherent individual
rights, especially for women. It's a lot like claiming there is "good socialism" and "bad socialism,"
which is what President Obama obviously thinks as he tries to implement the
equivalent of national socialism in America. Witness the national
socialist health care mess called ObamaCare. Unfortunately for Obama,
"socialism," by definition, is inherently bad since it denies fundamental
principles of inherent individual rights. Rights to "receive" are not
true rights, they are welfare redistributions taken from others by force.
Health care is not a right; neither is education. It is -- or should
be -- treated as an economic commodity, an exchangeable service, traded in
the market like any other service or commodity
while respecting the inherent individual rights of the exchangers.
Force and fraud by government is not necessary as an axiomatic primary to
implement either health care or education in any nation that respects
individuals' rights. Once again, it is becoming
more and more obvious that President Obama is -- wittingly or not -- some
sort of Islamic Trojan Horse living in the White House and attempting to make
excuses for all types of collectivism, whether it's national socialism or a
global Islamic Califphate. The former is economic and called Nazi-ism,
the German term for national socialism.
The latter is moral philosophical and called an Islamic Caliphate with Sharia Law
that disregards the concept of inherent individual rights. Both are totalitarian
dictatorships and that currently describes both the national and foreign
policies of President Obama. As President Obama continues to go
overboard in making up more and more contradictory excuses for his obvious
ideology of state/religious collectivism, i.e. his national
redistributionist economic policies and religious tribalism of Sharia Law,
his moral philosophy is becoming more and more obvious to everybody.
He is fooling nobody at his National Islamic Seminars and National Prayer Breakfasts
as he keeps sticking his big foot deeper and deeper into his own mouth...,
well, nobody except maybe the talk show hosts on MSNBC who, like Obama, continue
to babble in the New Speak of disconnected, social political and economic
Feb 16, 2015 Left Liberals are now claiming that Albert Einstein was
actually an idiot. Why? Because he didn't graduate from college.
Really? I guess that means that both the General and Special Theories
of Relativity are untrue. That's right, said Howard Dean, screaming in
an interview on national TV. E does not equal mc squared.
Uh-huh. Hallelujah! In a related revelation, left liberal MSNBC TV talk show
hosts also claim that Microsoft founder Bill Gates does not have a
well-rounded education because he, too, did not finish college at Harvard. Tisk, tisk. Yeah, what a dummy Bill Gates is.
You bet. And
ditto for Dell Computer CEO Michael Dell, and Facebook's Zuckerman, and
Apple's Steve Jobs, and American Founding Father Benjamin Franklin, etc.
etc. etc. the list goes on and on. Ya-yesssssss! What we need
are more naive, narcissistic, economic village idiots like Islamic terrorist
sympathizer Barack Obama who -- rumor has it -- graduated from Harvard Law
School, served as editor of the Harvard Law Review (without having edited or
authored a single article for the Law Review, by the way) but even though he
supposedly graduated from Harvard, doesn't know the difference between $hit and Shinola. Oh, by the way, Gov Scott Walker of Wisconsin, claim the left
Liberals, needs a Phd from Princeton in order to run for the Office of the
President of the United States. Maybe Gov
Walker should study theology under Rev. Jeremiah Wright for 20 years, too,
just like President Obama. And smoke a coupla joints with bombing
terrorist Bill Ayers. That would qualify Gov Walker for President in
2016, uh-huh, you bet, just like Barack Hussein Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong.
Feb 16, 2015 Left liberal Mayor Dinkleberry DeBlasio of New York City
has formed a new public education bureau that encourages poor mistreated
students to file complaints and lawsuits against rotten vicious public
education teachers and principals after said students kick the crap out of
the teachers and principals. Yes, the poor have-not little snots
beating up their pub ed teachers are simply misunderstood and the nasty
educators must be taught a lesson. Meanwhile, 85% of the students in
The Big Apple are teaching the NY pub ed system a lesson of their own:
namely, they have bailed out of the pub ed system altogether and are
enrolled in private schools. Think about that for a second: only
15% of the students in NYC attend public school. 85% attend private
schools. Soon, there will be no students attending the pub ed school
system in NYC. The only people showing up to work will be
teachers and administrators who still think they have a job. Maybe
they can spend all day drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes in the
teachers' lounge. After 20 years, they can collect their outrageously
over-priced pensions for doing absolutely nothing. See how socialist
education systems work? In the beginning, socialists said we needed pub ed
because the poor could not or would not educate or provide for the education for
their own children. So, after 50 years of total pub ed failure, the
socialists have finally reached the very result they claimed they needed to
solve: namely, no education for the poor. Funny how socialism
always brings about the very condition the socialist left Liberal
Progressives claim they are trying to prevent. Maybe it's inherent in
the act of altruistic state collectivism in the first place. Ya think?
Feb 16, 2015 Yesterday, Islamic terrorists ISIS just slit the throats
of 21 Egyptians who traveled to Libya to find work to provide for their
families. Last week, Islamic terrorists burned a Jordanian pilot to
death in a steel cage. Why did they kill the Egyptians? Because
they were Coptic Christians. That's right. Because the Egyptians
held a different moral philosophy than the Islamic terrorists.
Meanwhile, President Obama, as usual, was spending three days playing golf
in Palm Springs, California. The White House issued a press release,
essentially saying, Sorry Charlie, that's life, what else is new?
"Fore," on the 18th hole, yelled Obama.
Feb 11, 2015 President Obama, meet Lord Chamberlain. Lord
Chamberlain, meet President Obama. Lord Chamberlain was the Bozo Prime
Minister of Great Britain just before WW II who signed an agreement in
Germany's Adolph Hitler in which good ol' Adolph -- who went on to murder
umpteen million Jews in concentration camps -- promised he (Adolph Hitler)
would not invade Czechoslovakia or any other European nation. Then, a coupla weeks
later, Hitler launched a blitzkrieg of panzer divisions (tanks) into Prague
and took over the Czech heartland. Shortly thereafter, the Limies booted Lord Chamberlain
through the goal posts of life and elected a new aggressive Prime Minister
named Winston Churchill. Churchill worked with the Americans and, as
you know, the US-British-and-Other Allies kicked Hitler's Axis of Evil back
to the Danube in Krautland. So, what's all this have to do with
President Obama today? Take a quick look at what Obama is now engaged
in on the international scene. The Mullahs of Iran have promised
President Obama that Iran is not creating a nuclear bomb in order to blow up
Israel (who they call the Little Satans) and America (who they call the Big
Satans). No, no, no, claim the Islamic terrorists running Iran.
They just want to crank up a coupla friendly nuclear power plants to light
up the light bulbs in their homes as they sit over tons and tons of barrels
of oil in the Middle East. Yeah, that's it. Iran simply wants to
create cleany greeny nuclear power plants on top of some of the largest oil
deposits in the known world because they love Green Peace. Uh-huh.
And President Obama -- repeating the history of Lord Chamberlain -- is
falling for it. Obama said yesterday that the Mullahs of Iran promised
-- ho, ho, ho, promised -- that creating and using nuclear armaments is not
within the moral philosophy or beliefs of the Iranian Islamic terrorists,
even though Iran is recognized as the Middle East center for such Islamic
terrorists. In Obama's ridiculous Peace Treaty with Iran, he proposes
to give (and already has given partial payments) to the Iranians billions of
dollars in cookies and lollipops and plans to finish off the terms of the
Peace Treaty with Iran several months to years later. Which gives Iran
more time to finish developing their nuclear holocaust machine. Yeah,
like the Mullahs of Iran aren't sitting around snickering in their turbans
at probably the most naive and stupid president America has ever had?
A President who by all actions and measurements of the last six years -- not
to mention all of his Islamic and radical Marxist formative years -- shows
that he and his administration (which, by the way is fully loaded with
Islamic terrorist sympathizers, some of whom were born in Iran or the Middle
East) is extremely naive and about to make the same horrible mistake that
Lord Chamberlain made in pre-WW II Europe? The way I see it, President
Obama is doing one of two things: (1) he is being extremely naive
about making a "peace" deal with the Iranian Islamic terrorists, or (2) he
knows exactly what he is doing and is a Trojan Horse implementing exactly
what he believes in his moral philosophy of purposefully attacking America,
a country that he wants to "fundamentally change." LIke what:
turn the US into an Islamic Caliphate because "the sound of the calling to
prayer every evening by the Islamic whomever is the sweetest sound on
Earth?" Quote unquote paraphrase by Barack Obama. Think about
it: would you trust the intelligence and integrity of somebody who
spent 20 years in the hateful congregation church of Rev. Jeremiah Wright?
Anybody who has spent over 20 seconds in the ridiculous religious
congregation of Rev. Wright who screamed at the top of his lungs, "No, no,
no, not God Bless America... God Damn America," is not somebody who has
America's best interests at heart. Nor would this person be able to
pass even the lowest US security clearance, just on the basis of his past
actions and acquaintances. And yet, this is the person -- President Obama -- who we now have trying to consummate a peace agreement with the
clever, crafty, lying sacks of camel dung in the Middle East who have lied
to the US over and over and over and broken every deal. When do
Americans stop being suckers? The Mullahs are not playing Tiddly Winks
or Marbles. They are playing world politics for keeps with genocide for Israelis,
Americans, and all "infidels" even if it means blowing up the entire planet.
And we send Howdy Doody to make a deal with those who think their salvation
lies in exterminating everything on planet Earth? Anybody from another
Galaxy flying by planet Earth is probably looking down and saying, "Pass."
Feb 08, 2015 OK, girl friends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, listen
up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. It didn't take
a professional shrink to figure out what's rumbling around in President
Obama's brain a couple of days ago when he addressed the National Prayer
Breakfast and told the audience "to get off their high horses because many
horrible acts were done by Christians during the Inquisition and the
Crusades." He was, of course, comparing the mostly Christian audience
to the latest actions of the ISIS Islamic terrorists who recently burned a
captive Jordanian fighter pilot alive in a cage and posted the video on the
Internet. This is like saying, Oh yeah, they (ISIS) are not so bad,
you Christians are just as bad as the Islamic terrorists because your
forefathers a thousand years ago committed atrocities in the Inquisition and
the Crusades. Really? There are many untruths and fallacious
twists of legality in Obama's statements. So, let's analyze what Obama was
really revealing, mostly about himself. First, he just revealed that
not only is he a devout Muslim, but he is actually supportive of current
Islamic terrorists. That's why he told the audience -- mostly
Christians -- to "get off their high horses." He was implying that, by
tribal association, the Christian audience was just as bad as he and the
Islamic terrorists are. He's not condemning himself. He's
condemning the audience. Therefore he doesn't think of himself as a
Christian. He identifies with the Muslim Brotherhood. Note that
Obama presumes everybody belongs to a tribe, either social, political,
economic, ethnic or religious. He doesn't mention the concept of
individuals, inherent individual rights, or private property rights. Only tribal collectivist Hatfield vs. McCoy feudal
actions. That's why he scolded the audience; they're just as bad, he
was saying, as he and the Islamic terrorists are. Note also that Obama
was saying that "children" are responsible for the sins of their fathers, or
their grandfathers, or their great-grandfathers and all the way back to 700
- 1,000 years ago. Plus you are guilty, according to Obama, if your
ancestry doesn't even trace back to whoever committed atrocities during the
Inquisition or Crusades 700 years ago but rather because you are a white
European or American who belongs to what Obama is trying to classify as
ethnic tribes, Christianity and Islam. He is a collectivist, a state
collectivist when babbling about Marxist and socialist economics; a
religious collectivist when babbling about Islam and Christianity; a racist
collectivist when babbling about black-white relations; and, in short,
President Obama is simply arguing for tribalism, not a limited government
whose sole function is to protect individual -- not tribal, individual --
rights and freedoms. Nobody in the audience at the National Prayer
Breakfast was guilty of any crimes or atrocities committed 1,000 years ago.
And at no time did Obama talk about INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS,
rights. That's because he is too busy bloviating about tribal rights,
collectivist rights, as if any action taken by any member of a tribe is the
fault or responsibility of every member of that tribe. If a Chinese
guy slit some European guy's throat a thousand years ago, then all Chinese
are guilty, implied Obama. So, what Obama truly revealed was that he
is an ethnic tribalist -- and, in fact, an Islamic terrorist tribalist,
which is why he brought up his "get off your high horses" dear audience
speech because all you white religious guys out there are just like me, says
Obama, since your tribal affiliation is the Christian Inquisition and
Crusades while his is Islamic terrorism. That's why Obama refuses to
state what everybody else already knows: Islamic terrorists are
threatening to take over planet Earth. His analogy unwittingly reveals
his personal thoughts about himself: namely, he is what he claimed the
audience was, not a Christian terrorist but rather an Islamic terrorist.
That's why he made the comparison, and, in fact, it was less a comparison as
it was a revelation about himself. Wow. What an unconscious
thought process he just unloaded about himself coming right out of his own
mouth to be televised on national TV. If this wasn't a true
confession, I don't know what is. Many of the Christians attending the
National Prayer Breakfast didn't understand the full content and meaning of
what Obama said. They were simply upset that he accused their religion
of having done bad things. Most did not pick up on the observation
that Obama was making a personal comparison to himself. Nor did they
"get it" that nobody in the room was guilty of any sins of their or other
people's ancestors. The take away upshot of Obama's National Prayer
Breakfast: as suspected, this, and all the other actions taken by
Obama BEFORE and AFTER the start of his presidency six years ago, is
beginning to confirm that he and many members of his administration are
Islamic terrorist sympathizers who are doing everything possible to destroy
the US Constitution, the American Middle Class, and the concept of inherent
individual rights and freedoms. Destroy the US economy with Obamacare,
open the borders to flood America with illegal immigrants, destroy the US
military with the Bergdahl exchange of releasing five Islamic terrorists
from Gitmo, supply the Taliban and Al Qaida with US arms and money in a "gun
running" cover up at Benghazi, use the NSA to spy on Americans, use the IRS
to target audits against Republicans, don't consult Congress for any
legislative actions but rather just issue EOs, and the list goes on and on.
Obama's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast should be a turning point, a
wake up call, to Americans and Congress that it's time to impeach President
Obama for high crimes and misdemeanors against the people of the United
States. What's it going to take: a suitcase nuke in a major
American city by Islamic terrorists who have tap danced their way across our
open borders because of Obama's insane amnesty program? Do we have a
Trojan Horse living in the White House? Tune in next week as Oil Can
Barry ties up the Statue of Liberty on the railroad tracks of Islamic
terrorism with a Caliphate choo-choo train bearing down on her ass...
Who will come save her? Who is John Galt?
Feb 08, 2015 President Obama casually traipsed up to the podium last
week and announced that he thinks the federal budget next year should be $4
trillion. By the year 2020, he thinks it's OK for the US budget to be
about $20 trillion. Uh-huh. So picture this. Some Bozo --
that's Obama -- presumes to know all there is to know about 100 trillion
different economic exchanges happening in the market every day all across
the US and internationally to such an extent that he knows how much he can
personally rearrange 100 trillion exchanges of commodities and services
through bureaucratic redistribution of said commodities and services in the
market. In order for somebody to think they can re-arrange the
trillions of future actions per hour in the US economy presumes they have
perfect knowledge of what's going on at that level right now. For
President Obama to casually saunter up to the microphone and propose how
much to spend next year on choo-choo trains, child care, community colleges
in Hodunk, iPhones, health care, Amtrak, the US Post Office, and hula hoops
is the height of economic insanity. Nobody knows this information.
Especially President Obama who is too busy playing golf to study MIT
Gruber's economic fantasy models, which, Gruber admitted, are lies anyway.
At most, they model the historical prices of aspirin and potatoes, which
have no bearing on future prices of the tea in China or anywhere else for
that matter. Economics ain't physics. And using calculus to play
with fake economic models whose input was based on subjective historical
decisions by consumers at that time for whatever subjective purposes has no
bearing on future subjective exchange ratios. So, President Obama,
please stop pretending that socialism works and go back to sleep in the Oval
Office. If you have the knowledge to know that the US budget for next
year should be $4 trillion, you should run for Special Omniscient in 2016
and why not propose a budget equal to, hmmm, how about infinity squared or
however fast the Federal Reserve can print up or create in the bowls of its
mainframe computers the counterfeit money you think you may need to save the
world from hunger, poverty, your personal Air Force One taxi fuel costs, and
purple lollipops for New York City on Wednesday nights past 10 pm?
Jan 30, 2015 President Obama steadfastly refuses to call the global
occurrence of Islamic terrorism of differently-named Muslim groups by one
term: namely, Islamic terrorism. His purpose in doing this is
manifold. First, he is trying to pretend
that the classification of objects,
issues, or concepts is wrong. This goes along with the left Liberal
precept called "profiling," which they label as "bad." True profiling,
however, is not bad. It is the basis of logical thinking and the
reasoning process itself. Classification of
concepts is rational thinking. The President and left
Liberals are attempting to discourage and disparage rational thinking, the
classification of concepts into logical categories, in order to convince
people to NOT THINK rationally. It is an attack against reason, an
attack against the thinking process itself. In this clever attack
against rational thinking, Liberals try to substitute their
disconnected thought globs method of
non-thinking as the new method of how one should "reason." Liberals
using a disconnected thought globs type of non-reasoning is an attack
against the rational thinking process so that Liberals can then put forth
their disconnected thought process as "good." So, in this clever
manner, President Obama can claim that the global occurrence of Islamic
terrorism by differently-named Muslim groups has no concepts in common and
that anybody who tries to group them or classify them as one issue, a
classification of related concepts, is wrong.
Second, it is becoming obvious that the President of the United
States, Barack Obama, may well clandestinely fall into the very group that
he is trying to disprove the existence of: i.e. Islamic terrorism.
Think about it. The Fort Hood shooting where the perp yelled "Alu
Akbar" as he killed other service men was reclassified by Obama as
"workplace violence." The Bergdahl Army deserter exchange to release
five Gitmo Islamic terrorists has been renamed "a simple end of war prisoner
exchange," pretending Bergdahl did not desert, even though the US Military
has already issued a judgment that he did. Obama is holding up the
release of this judgment. The Libyan Consulate murders have been
reclassified as the result of some Hollywood film maker's video ridiculing
Allah instead of Islamic terrorism, terrorism which was the result of President Obama's
and Hillary Clinton's gun running escapade to various Islamic terrorist
groups in the Middle East that went awry. The President's insistence
on amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants flooding across our southern
borders, allowing Islamic terrorists to freely enter our country, has been
reclassified as a touchy-feely act of humanity. Never mind the
possible suitcase nukes the Islamic terrorists could be carrying across our
porous border. The upshot is that President Obama is walking on very
thin ice trying to cover up the logical reasoning process, rational
thinking, and the logical classification of issues, objects, and concepts
that would lead any rationally-thinking individual to conclude, and
therefore take action against, Islamic terrorists. It is becoming
increasingly obvious that President Obama is acting more and more like a
Trojan Horse -- whether on purpose or by stupidity -- for Islamic terrorists
called Hamas, Islamic terrorists called Hezbollah, Islamic terrorists
called The Taliban, Islamic terrorists called Al Qaeda, Islamic terrorists
called ISIS, Islamic terrorists called Boko Haram, and the list goes on and
on, choose your country in this global Islamic Caliphate. The
scientific method depends on the grouping of similar objects, issues, and
concepts to reach logical conclusions. Archimedes, Pythagoras,
Galileo, Einstein and others came to conclusions based upon the grouping,
the classification, the categorization of similar concepts and observations.
This is called rational, step by step thinking. Liberals would call
the scientific method "profiling" or "discrimination" and label such
thinking as "bad." So, for Liberals, rational thinking is bad.
Disconnected thought globs, according to Liberals, is good. All detectives,
Crime Scene Investigators (CSI), scientists, military tacticians and
strategists, cryptologists, intelligence officers, police, judges, doctors,
and elementary school children learning why 2 + 2 = 4 should be discouraged
from rational thinking because it is, according to President Obama and
Liberals, "profiling?" That is Obama's goal. And God help
America if we find out that President Obama is actually a self-appointed
Trojan Horse for the worldwide Caliphate being formed by all the
not-so-disparate terrorists who have at least one thing in common:
namely, they are all Islamic terrorist groups committing acts of terror in
the name of Islam, the definition of which is not "peace" but rather
"submission" -- i.e. submission of "infidels" to self-appointed Muslim
dictators. There goes the concept of inherent individual rights and
freedoms right down the drain. If you plotted all the Islamic
terrorist groups on a graph against their actions, changing only their
names, you would get a straight line with the term "Islamic terrorist" being
a constant in this equation. Duh, who'd a thunk: 2 + 2 =
Jan 23, 2015 According to FOX News, the Obama administration on
Wednesday paid $490 million in cash assets to Iran and will have released a
total of $11.9 billion to the Islamic Republic by the time nuclear talks are
scheduled to end in June, according to figures provided by the State
Today’s $490 million release, the third such payment of this amount since
Dec. 10, was agreed to by the Obama administration under the parameters of
another extension in negotiations over Tehran’s contested nuclear program
that was inked in November.
Iran will receive a total of $4.9 billion in unfrozen cash assets via 10
separate payments by the United States through June 22, when talks with Iran
are scheduled to end with a final agreement aimed at curbing the country’s
nuclear work, according to a State Department official.
Iran received $4.2 billion in similar payments under the 2013 interim
agreement with the United States and was then given another $2.8 billion by
the Obama administration last year in a bid to keep Iran committed to the
talks through November, when negotiators parted ways without reaching an
Jan 22, 2015 Immediately after President Obama babbled his 2015 State
of the Union socialist speech in Congress in Washington DC, he jumped onto
Air Force Uno and flew to Boise, Idaho to reiterate his Marxist philosophy
to a mostly student crowd of about 2,000 to 3,000 youths. Idaho is
overwhelmingly Conservative except for the voters in Boise's 16th, 17th, and
19th District. The state legislature is about 90% Republican and many
Districts do not even field a Democratic candidate because they are going to
lose in the elections anyway. Many Districts have only one Republican
running in elections. All two of Idaho's electoral votes in 2008 went
to GOP McCain and in 2012 went to GOP Mitt Romney. The big political
discussion in Idaho is whether the GOP is Tea Party enough or whether the
GOP candidates are RINOs. So why would President Obama waste his
political campaign time and money stopping off in Boise, Idaho to preach to
a VERY limited choir of socialist students? Because his message is
videoed by the major news media and they will show his speech on national
TV. In today's age of advanced communications, it really doesn't
matter where President Obama stops off to deliver his socialist campaign
speeches, except that it wouldn't look good for him -- marketing-wise -- to
always fly to Hawaii and lounge around on the beaches while filming his
socialist speeches for national TV. That's why he flies all over the
country, stopping off in Hodunksvilles from Boise to Hoboken, to deliver his
socialist clap-trap: it looks good on TV to be talking to the masses.
Everything Obama does and says is orchestrated by his movie script writers
and comes off like a well-oiled Coca-Cola ad during half time at the Super
Bowl. In Boise, he even hee-hawed around about BSU's unique blue
football turf, over which the students had the collective orgasm that his
marketing speech writers knew would happen. The Blue Turf, "Yeahhh!"
the crowd goes wild. Tax The Rich, "Yeahh!" the crowd goes wild.
Free Child Care, "Yeahhh!" the crowd goes wild. Free Community
Colleges, "Yeahhh!" the crowd goes wild. Free health care coverage.
"Yeahhh! the crowd goes wild. "And you can keep your doctor..."
oops. Total silence. Welcome to 1938 in Austria. History
Jan 21, 2015 The President of No Authority. That should have
been the title of President Barack Obama's 2015 State of the Union Speech
last night. In that speech, the President said that He wants to tax
the uber rich and redistribute that money to other people in the form of
government handouts for "free" child care and "free" community colleges.
His reasoning: the ultra rich billionaires do not need or would not
miss the extra $50 million in increased income and capital gains and death
taxes. But wait a minute. By what authority does the President
of the United States step into the middle of voluntary transactions in the
free market in which millions of individuals voluntarily exchanged $89 each
to Bill Gates' company Microsoft for a copy of his Windows operating system
for their computers? Perhaps Bill Gates had already determined that if
made $50 billion in profits he wanted to donate $50 million to the School of
the Blind. By what right does President Obama tell Bill Gates that the
government wants to take away Gates' donation to the School of the Blind
and, instead, give said money to welfare families in Detroit and Chicago for
their child care and community college costs? Are we a nation of
individual rights and freedoms, free market capitalism, backed up by
objective laws or are we a nation of Presidential and government
dictatorship? This issue is a question of individual rights vs. state
collectivism, i.e. collectivist so-called "rights to receive based upon
alleged relative NEED." It is also a question of the
definition of the term "rights." Bill Gates and the consumers
voluntarily exchanging money in a free trade agreement for his Windows
product represents freedom. President Obama taxing Bill Gates and
taking part of the money exchanged by the consumers for his product and
claiming government bureaucrats should determine how Bill Gates spends his
"excess" profits represents state interventionism in a dictatorship.
Bill Gates has the right to spend however much of his voluntarily obtained
money for the School of the Blind, for computers in classrooms, for the SPCA
to help abandoned puppies, or to build a huge $20 million mansion for
himself (for which he will be employing hundreds of workers to build such a
mansion), or he can give all of his money to his children, some of whom may
be donating half of their share to fight the Ebola virus in Africa.
Their decision, not President Obama's. The point is, whose rights are
we talking about? Certainly not the welfare recipients receiving
money stolen from Bill Gates by President Obama and redistributed to
whatever cause Obama desires. The recipients of stolen money have no right to receive anything
from anybody. They only have the same rights as the producers, the
people participating in the exchange of money or other products to purchase
Bill Gates' Windows product, or other products. The real issue, as
stated above, is not where President Obama thinks that Bill Gates' profits should
go, but rather the issue is a rights issue in which Bill Gates, not the
government, gets to determine where to spend the fruits of his time and
labor. Otherwise, why should Bill Gates or anybody else bother working?
And it begs the question: who are you working for? This is, of
course, the classic case of Socialism vs. the Free Market. What
President Obama was blathering about in his State of the Union Speech last
night was simply his immoral philosophy of altruistic state collectivism --
socialism based on the false assumption that Obama, as the government
dictator, has the right and authority to step into the middle of voluntary
exchanges in the free market, take whatever He thinks is "excess" profits,
and redistribute that according to his misguided/personal philosophy of "need." Obama's philosophy, socialism, is whoever claims to be the most "needy," has
some sort of right to initiate government force to take the fruits of
others' labors and redistribute it to themselves. We have another word
for this: it's called robbery. In summary, President Obama's
2015 State of the Union Speech should be looked upon by the 535 members of
Congress and the public in general as a dictator's speech trying to
vindicate robbery. As Ayn Rand would have said, Obama's 2015 State of
the Union Speech was simply a frail attempt at trying to gain the sanction
of his victims, because at his base premise he is arguing for the government
to strip individuals of their inherent rights and freedoms. Never mind
the stolen commodities, it is the loss of individual rights and freedoms
that you should be concerned about. In short,
Left Liberal Progressivism is simply a war against inherent individual
rights of the individual. It is a war against the
underlying philosophy of the US Constitution, which includes the Bill of
Rights. It is a war against the
rule of law, and an attempt to implement the rule of men, Mob Rule, better
known as state collectivism whether it be socialism, fascism, or communism
-- all of which always turns into a brutal dictatorship and economic ruin
for everybody including -- in the long run -- those who proposed it.
President Obama is a President of No Authority and his 2015 State of the
Union was simply another socialist joke.
Jan 16, 2015 "The militant Muslim is the
person who beheads the Infidel, while the moderate Muslim holds the feet of
the victim." -- Marco Polo, circa 1200 AD
Jan 14, 2015 Prediction: France has already lost the war against
Islamic terrorism. Why? Few people realize that socialist France
is not really a nation any longer. What constitutes a nation? A
nation has geographic boundaries. A nation has a unique culture, even
if it is comprised of immigrants. Litigiously, a nation has founding
documents, with such institutions as an executive branch, a
congress or parliament, and some type of police and judicial system.
That is what broadly defines a nation. And that is not France.
There are now about 20 million Islamic Muslims living in France today.
Five to six million Islamic Muslims live in non-integrated ghettos
surrounding Paris. These Islamic ghettos are called No-Go Zones.
Regular non-Islamic French citizens do not venture into the No-Go Zones --
hence the name -- for fear of losing their life. Even the French cops
do not enter the No-Go Zones. No-Go Zones have their own Sharia Law,
their own court system, and no French police. In other words, France
is no longer a nation as one typically defines a nation. How can a
nation exist with two different systems of law? If a regular French
citizen or tourist makes a wrong left turn and ends up in a No-Go Zone and
accidentally bumps his/her car into a pedestrian, for example, does said
driver fall under the legal jurisdiction of the main French government or
under the legal jurisdiction of Sharia Law? Do the Islamic Muslims
have the right to stone a woman to death in the No-Go Zones of Sharia Law
for, say, smooching some dude on the street, or does that non-crime under
French law fall under the regular French judicial system? See what I
mean? Who owns France? What kind of nation is it, besides being
a highly socialist welfare state? Tactically speaking, from a battle
or war position, Parisians are surrounded by the Islamo terrorists in what
used to be their (the French's) own country. Duh. How did France
get to this level of strategic military impotence? As the Caliphate
from the Middle East continues to expand, the French are in a very
precarious position. Can 25,000 or even 75,000 Paris police protect
Parisians against 5 million Islamic Muslims bent on rioting and tearing down
the city when the shooting begins? I think not. Certainly not
without shooting a boatload of Islamic Muslims rioting against Parisians.
What will the French do? We know what the French did when the Nazis
marched into their nation in WW II: they quickly gave up and welcomed
the enemy with open arms. Nazi Germany ran France for many years until
they were liberated by the Americans. Any military tactician worth his
salt would say, whoa, dudes, the French are surrounded and when a huge
Islamic terrorist conflict finally occurs, France the non-nation, the split
nation with a huge Trojan Horse of Islamic terrorists already in the middle
of the country, will fall, and in fact will become the European central headquarters
for the Caliphate as they attack the rest of Europe. If you think this
can't happen, you better take a good look at many other European nations.
If you do, you will find that Britain is also not a nation. It too,
has No-Go Zones where Sharia Law exists rather than British law.
Germany has a large contingent of Islamic Muslims who also are sympathetic
to the Islamic Muslims. Other nations in Europe may not be split into
two types of judicial systems, yet, but they contain millions of Islamic
Muslims, too. Denmark, Norway, Finland, Holland, Belgium and other
European nations are becoming non-nations. Never mind Indonesia.
Never mind African nations. They're already majority Muslim.
And what else? The United States is on its way to being a non-nation,
too. It has a President who is obviously a Muslim -- note all his
actions -- and who is pretending to be a Christian. The only thing
that explains the non-cohesive un-American actions of President Obama is:
he is a Trojan Horse, an Islamic Muslim, following the moral philosophy of
state collectivism (socialism) and religious collectivism (Islamic Muslim).
The moral philosophy of Church and state collectivism is what has turned
France into a non-nation and if nothing happens to curb this moral
philosophy, it is what will turn other nations, including the US, into a
split nation, too. A split nation is a non-nation. Therefore,
the United States, if Obama continues unabated, will cease to exist as the United
States. As Sherlock Holmes would say, when everything one has examined
does not explain a result, then whatever remains must be the truth. Obama's dismantling the Middle Class, allowing uncontrolled immigration,
releasing Gitmo Islamic terrorists, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood,
abolishing the words "Islam," "fatwa," and others from intelligence agencies'
documents, refusing to call Islamic terrorism in America -- and lately in
France -- by its real name, Islamic terrorism, add this and more all up over
the last six years and what does one get? Not an accident. Not a
mistake. Not a coincidence. Not stupidity -- except in the long
run -- on the part of Obama. What one gets is a President whose
planned, philosophical, Trojan Horse strategy is a conscious plan to turn
America and the world into non-nations and end up with a World Islamic
Caliphate. Nothing else explains Obama's actions over the last six
years of his Presidency. And the French
had better soon learn more about how to just hold candles, march in the
street singing cumbayah, and read satirical
magazines. The Frogs are surrounded. And all the "Je suis
Charlies" living in France are probably unarmed; no 2nd Amendment in France. Good luck Froggies! "Ribbit!"
Jan 09, 2015 Shut up, girl friends! Pull up the barn floor, pour
yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, and listen up. The crack
shooters on the French SWAT team certainly tracked down and knocked off the
3-4 Islamic terrorists -- oh yoo hoo, President Obama,
the Islamic terrorists screaming, "Alluhu Akbar," --
referring to Allah, an omniscient who nobody can prove exists but don't let
rational logic stand in your way -- claiming that Allah is great, and is the
only God, far as they know, and, basically, I want my Mommy
-- yes, the Islamic terrorists who murdered 12 people in Paris yesterday
including Charlie Hebdo magazine journalists, at least one Paris cop, and
anybody else who got in their way, namely a few people held hostage at a
Jewish delicatessen. More deaths of innocents may soon surface.
While the French cops were like Speedy Gonzaleses to the rescue, it would
have been nice if the crack SWAT team had aimed a little lower and just shot
the Islamic terrorists in the legs so they would still be alive and we could
QUESTION them. I mean, crack shots, SWAT team, why not shoot low on
purpose, earn that Sharpshooter Medal that you were awarded at the School de
la Gendarmes and capture the cowards instead of purposely killing them?
You see, the intelligence game is like a giant 1,000 piece jigsaw puzzle:
you have 50 or 100 pieces and don't know what the picture of the jigsaw
puzzle looks like. But the Islamic terrorists know. And the key to
intelligence is to capture and interrogate the perps to find out what the
Big Picture is. So while the French SWAT team should be commended for
an outstanding job in BOLO and apprehension, they score a big fat zero for
intelligence gathering. Then
again, maybe the French are like President Obama and Diane Feinstein in the
US Senate, who released a report against CIA interrogation techniques which
foils the entire rationale regarding gathering intelligence in the first
place, who knows? What would have happened if the Islamic terrorists
had done the same thing at the New York Times in The Big Apple? First,
President Obama would have said, "Uh, it looks like just another case of
workplace violence, nothing happening here, move right along." New
York City Mayor De Blasio would have said, "The racist NYC cops better not
shoot any of the disgruntled ethnic alleged perpetrators of this friendly
workplace dispute, everybody stand down while we convene a meeting to find
out what the problem is... ." Al Sharpton would have said, "I can't
breathe, black lives matter, what do we want: dead cops, when do we
want them: now. Send your checks and money orders to my Swiss
Account in Geneva." And US Attorney General Eric Holder would have
sent 200 lawyers and Acorn agents from the New Black Panther Party to New
York City to check out who shot whom at the NY Times, what each of the
victim's and perp's skin color was, immediately claimed "racism" and
inquired whether the perps' getaway car was properly smog-checked by the
EPA. Plus did the perps buckle up their seat belts and not use cell
phones while driving to and from the scene of the workplace dispute?
Important questions, like, you know, did anybody have a 32 oz Big Gulp soda
pop at the scene of the crime or in the getaway car? Without proper
intelligence methods, look for more shoot-outs and bombings by Islamic
terrorists -- oops, I mean disgruntled workplace non-workers trained in
combat in Iraq, Iran, and Yemen -- coming soon to a major city near you in
Europe and America.
Jan 04, 2015 Lest you think
America could never reach the hyper-inflation absurdities of Germany's
Weimar Republic, you are witnessing this process right now as it unfolds in
Washington, DC. $18,000,000,000,000 (trillion)
History Lesson 101A, Weimar Republic, Germany, 1920s In
1914, Germany’s Fed Reserve, the Reichsbank, suspended conversion of its
paper money into gold. By November 1923, after continual “injections of
liquidity,” Reich Marks in circulation soared past 92.8 quintillion Marks
and skyrocketed past 496 quintillion Marks through July of 1924. On Oct 25,
1923, the Reichsbank apologized that it had been able to only print 120
quadrillion Marks that day, but the demand was for one quintillion Marks.
Finally, after nobody would accept the Mark, the Reichsbank devalued to a
new Rentenmark convertible at 1 trillion to one. By Nov 1923, circulation
had increased 245 billion times and prices 1,380 billion times. Inflation
finally stopped in one day when 4.2 Rentenmarks (4.2 trillion old Marks)
exchanged for 1 Dollar, which was convertible into gold. Germany, via the
Dollar, finally went back to the gold standard, after destroying its entire
economy in 9 years through hyperinflation of its non-backed paper money.
Dr. H. Hazlitt, Economist
Today, in 2015, after FDR dumped the gold standard in 1933 and Nixon cut all
dollar ties to gold in 1971, our derivative markets currently exceed a half
a quadrillion dollars or $680,000,000,000,000 – six hundred trillion
dollars – of non-collateralized paper fueled by America’s central bank, the
Federal Reserve. And what is it that everybody is screaming for more of?
The injection of trillions and trillions of more non-collateralized paper
money as “liquidity” to “spur” the “growth” of the economy.
Jan 03, 2015 Yahoo, the new US Congress will get sworn in on Mon Jan
05, 2015. Republicans in the US House gained an even bigger majority
than it previously had and Republicans in the US Senate took over as a
majority. That means there is no excuse for the Republicans to not solve
all kinds of problems, even if Bozo Obama vetoes their legislation.
They can refuse to finance any of his new crap that he has tried to foist
down Americans' throats over the last six years. And they can repeal
legislation upon which Obama's illegal Executive Orders rest. In that
clever manner, the EO will be abolished. Will the Republicans do what
the electorate gave them a clear majority to do in the 2014 midterm
elections or will they all turn into RINOs and go left liberal on us?
We shall see. One of their first steps would be to abolish President
Obama giving an oral State of the Union Speech on Jan 19th or 20th and
simply ask for it to be delivered to Congress in writing only. That
would be a nice intro for Congress into this new term. Slap Obama
upside his state collectivist rhetoric and get on with repealing ObamaCare
and all the other gobble-dee-gook socialism that Uncle Barry has tried to
dump on us. We shall see whether the Republicans are really limited
government Congressmen and women or whether they are simply Democrat
Jackasses in Elephant suits kissing each other's multi-million dollar
Jan 01, 2015 Happy New Year to everybody! Let's see now,
yesterday in the Fiesta Bowl (football) the Boise State University Broncos, rated # 20 in the BCS, whipped
Arizona who was rated #10 in the BCS. The score: 38 BSU, 30 Arizona. BSU
had it 21 to 0 in the first quarter. Arizona was in 2nd place in the
Pack 12 Conference, being the only team that beat the Oregon Ducks who were
# 1 in the Pack 12 and # 2 in the nation (BCS). So, what we got here,
folks, is: BSU beat Arizona who beat the Ducks who will beat Florida
State today and then the Ducks will beat the winner of the Alabama/Ohio game
in the BCS Title Bowl game. That means Boise just won the BCS Title
Bowl game in 2015 since we beat the teams that consecutively beat everybody
else. Is this a math proof or what? What can I tell you?
That's the way it happened, moving into the Pacific Northwest.
Dec 26, 2014 In light of the recent race-baiting by President Barack
Obama, DOJ Eric Holder, New York Mayor Bill De Blasio, and the whacky Rev.
Al Sharpton meeting in the Oval Office with Obama as his spokesman for
"racial equality" in America, we should ask ourselves an important
statistical question: what is the definition of "racial equality?"
Are we referring to numbers of equal outcome, or equal opportunity or what?
Once defined, so we know what we're talking about, how does one calculate that number and to which companies or organizations
does it apply? Race baiter Al Sharpton and upper level politicians
from President Obama down to the Mayor of NYC are babbling three falsehoods:
(1) proclaiming that all police departments and other organizations are predominantly white, and (2) that
American corporations or organizations such as police departments do not reflect the percentage of blacks (13%) living
in America, and (3) the result of Falsehoods # 1 and 2 are the causes of
"racism." All three are not true. Racism in two recent police incidents -- Ferguson, MO and
The Big Apple -- was shown by a grand jury NOT to
be a factor. And the NYC
police department is not predominantly white. Many members on the
grand juries were black. Al Sharpton's claim that
SONY corporation -- involved because of the recent hacking of its internal
communications system by the North Koreans, thus revealing that some
corporate leaders may have sent racist emails internally -- does not meet
Sharpton's undefined opinion of racial equality. What that number is, he does not
elaborate. Neither does President Obama and his minions in reference
to their race-baiting rhetoric. Nobody defines their premises but they
all claim to know the answers to their disconnected thought globs. Let's
assume that Sharpton and Obama and their race-baiting gang think that racial
equality means that all corporations in America should be 13% black, the
percentage of African Americans living in the US. That total number would be
13% times 315 million citizens equaling 41 million blacks. So, should
13% of SONY's employees be black, otherwise the SONY corporate leaders are "racists?" Let's
look at other US corporations. Take the National Football League (the
NFL). It is a nonprofit 501 (c) (6) corporation with 32 teams and 53
players per team. The NFL has 1,696 players. But wait. 68%
of the NFL players are black. According to Al Sharpton's
definition of "racial equality," only 13% of the NFL should be black.
That number would equal 220 black players in the NFL and 1,476 should be
white. So, is the NFL a racist corporation AGAINST white football
players? There is no evidence of that. The drafting of NFL
players from hundreds of college football teams is carried out by objective
competition and bidding by all 32 NFL teams every year. The fact that 68% of NFL
players are African American does not appear to be based upon "racism" or
procedures purposefully creating "racial inequality." The free market
in choosing NFL players happens to result in 68% black players, not the type
of racism that Al Sharpton and our upper level politicians are insinuating
exists for American corporations, police departments, and the Girl Scouts.
Let's look at another corporation. The percentage of black players in
National Basketball Association is 78%. Does
that constitute Sharpton-Obama-Holder-De Blasio "racism," too? Based
solely on percentage statistics, only 59 NBA players should be black; 391 should be
white. Is this the result of racism in America or is it just the
voluntary free market? The big question is: who are President Obama, DOJ Eric
Holder, NYC Mayor De Blasio, and the whacky Rev. Al Sharpton to define what
percentage of which ethnicity should be employed in any free market business
or even the police departments of the United States? Are blacks
inherently better athletes than whites in football and basketball or are
whites being held back by "racism?" Are
whites better businessmen than blacks at SONY and other corporations or are
blacks being held back by "racism?"
Are we back to arguing about nature vs. nurture in genetics and biology?
Who knows? But one thing that we do know is: we essentially have laissez-faire,
a free market, in
the determination of who, no matter what ethnicity, progresses to whatever
level one is capable of in America, notwithstanding the economic
disadvantages that the president's own Democratic Party has created as
welfare ghettoes in most of America's major cities. Even this does not
explain why a large number of blacks have escaped the welfare ghettoes to
predominate in corporations such as the NFL and NBA. The President of the United States and
whacko race-baiters such as the Rev. Al Sharpton should stop falsely yelling
"Fire!" in a crowded theatre. Overt and institutionalized
ethnic discrimination by local, state, and federal government and
corporations went out in the 1960's. There is no fire and there was no
"racism" in the recent police response to the perps, the thugs, who
instigated attacks against the police in Ferguson and New York City.
Two New York police officers have already been killed due to false
race-baiting by the President and others. Rioting and looting have
also occurred as a result. Advice to the President, other politicians
and race-baiters: give it a rest, or take the legal responsibility for
falsely yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. Go 49ers!
Dec 21, 2014 Two weeks ago in these very pages, we wrote how those who
falsely cry "Fire!" in a crowded theatre should be held accountable for the
results of their fraudulent act. Falsely yelling "Fire!" in a crowded
theatre is not free speech since it is a violation of the implied contract
that theatre goers have between each other that nobody is going to commit
this type of fraud. It is, in fact, a crime. Similarly, the
President of the United States falsely crying "Racism!" on national TV to
those cities whose ethnicities are predominantly African American and where
a grand jury has already determined that racism was NOT an issue in their
jury case(s), is committing the same type of fraud, the same type of crime
-- if not worse -- as the person who falsely yells "Fire!" in a crowded
theatre. Others who joined in the President's false accusation of
"Racism!" -- namely DOJ Eric Holder, race-baiter politician Al Sharpton, and
the Mayor of New York City, De Blasio -- after grand juries already judged
that race was not an issue in both cases, are guilty of inciting riots,
looting, and attacks against citizens by hooligans who took the President
and other officials at their word. And so now we wake up to
yesterday's murder of two New York City policemen, one Asian and one Latino,
who were shot down and murdered as they sat in their police car eating
lunch, by an individual from Baltimore who took President Obama, DOJ Eric
Holder, Mayor De Blasio, and the Rev. Al Sharpton at their false words of
"Racism!" and decided to take action based upon those false cries. We
know this from the perp's emails and communications issued on the Internet
before he committed his crime. Aren't the false words of high level
political figures issued to the citizenry of a nation actionable as crimes
if they incite the citizenry to perform actions based upon those false
accusations? If the President of the US showed up on national TV and
said that the North Koreans had just dropped a nuclear bomb on Hoboken, New
Jersey, and it was not true but people rioted while trying to leave the area
or looted stores to stock up on goods, is he not to be held accountable for
the results of his fraudulent speech? This is just one in a long
string of fraudulent utterances and declarations by Obama and his
Administration in all areas of social political economics in America over
the last six years. Lies are lies and they should be held actionable
in a court of law by those who falsely commit such fraud -- especially by
very high level officials who are lying to the public. The proper
judicial procedure against the President of the United States for such
fraudulent behavior is specified in the US Constitution and is called
impeachment, which is removal from his office. It is up to the US
House to initiate impeachment proceedings and the US Senate to act as a
court to try said impeachment. Where is the US House today?
Where is the US Senate? Do we have to wait for the President to blow
us all to Smitherines before Congress wakes up and takes proper action to
stop this type of illegal action by the highest level of our Executive
Branch? Re-read the Declaration of Independence. Isn't it
starting to sound exactly like the description of why the American colonists
revolted against the monarchy of King George in the 18th century? King
George was trying to fundamentally change America, too. What's next?
Will President Obama quarter soldiers in our houses next week? Our
little Emperor is not even issuing his dictates as Executive Orders any
longer. They are not in the Federal Register as such. He simply
issues them as "Memos" from his desk in the Oval Office. How clever.
How crafty. Obama just stated the other day that he will continue to
do whatever he thinks he can legally get away with no matter what Congress
does. Really? What is the US Constitution, just a set of
voluntary "guidelines?" If so, Congress is just an afterthought and
can be disbanded, let's see now, how about next Tuesday? Altogether
now, let's sing along with President Obama's latest hit song, "Yo-ho, yo-ho,
a pirate's life for me..."
Dec 18, 2014 Barack Obama's Big Hoax # 1001: Open Relations With
Cuba. American citizen Alan Gross was supposedly a prisoner in Cuba
for 5 years. Was he really? Or was he a fan of the Cuban
socialist system, sitting around eating tacos on Tuesdays? Note that
in the photo of Alan Gross with his attorneys and publicist in their offices
in the US, there is a picture of Cuban mass murderer Che Guevara hanging on
the wall in the background. What does that tell us? Well, here's
one guess: Obama and the Gang worked up a deal to "free" --
yeah, "free" ha ha -- Alan Gross in exchange for the US giving up 3 Cuban
spies and both countries opening up trade with each other, even though Cuba
was recently put on the US's terrorist list. Hmm. Socialist
Obama, behind the scenes announced at midnight -- another one of his Zero
Dark Thirty moments -- another cleverly concocted "issue" (granting free
cookies to Cuba) in order to drag everybody, especially the news media, away
from his previous "crisis" and continue his ongoing perpetual crisis after
crisis after crisis style of Imperial governing of America. All we do
in this country is jump from one governmental crisis to another. You'd
think the Republicans or somebody out there in news media land would finally
catch on to what Obama and His Gang are trying to do to the US:
namely, completely destroy the entire middle class and set America up for a
civil (racist) war and international WW III. If you tried to dream up
a better way to wipe America off the face of the earth and "fundamentally
change" its foundational documents and moral philosophy of individual rights
and free market capitalism, you couldn't concoct a better method than what
Dictator Barack Obama is doing. He's doing everything possible to
shred the US Constitution, especially the concept of checks and balances
between the three branches of government. Every Obama issue is new
crisis and for God's sake we can't "let a good crisis go to waste," can we? This
recent Cuban fiasco crisis covers up
the latest $1.1 Trillion GOP cave-in for the 2015 budget crisis of last week. The
$1.1 Trillion budget crisis of last week covers up the Diane Feinstein and Democrat's
one-sided anti CIA terrorist interrogation crisis of the week before. The CIA terrorist
interrogation crisis of the week before covers up Obama's Illegal Memo -- not even an EO --
amnesty crisis for 5 million illegal immigrants from Mexico. This
unconstitutional Memo crisis granting amnesty for 5 million Illegals
covers up... and it just goes on and on and on with no end in sight to
Obama's continual creation of weekly "crises." And what do the Republicans
do? Two or three out of 535 Republicans in the House and
Senate cry "unconstitutional" while the majority of Republicans and
Democrats tell the minority to "shut up!" Shut up? By all
rights, the US House should be enacting impeachment proceedings against the
most rogue president ever to occupy the White House in US history and the leaders of the
majority political party -- the GOP -- are doing and saying nothing. Meanwhile, the
Fourth Branch of Government, the news media, gleefully reports every Obama-created
crisis as if it was the most wonderful thing since sliced bread with honey
and peanut butter spread on top of it. The American people have
already de facto screamed and voted in the last midterm elections for the US
Congress to impeach Little Napoleon in the Oval Office but the pussies in
Congress are too busy shoving billion dollar earmarks into their new
Trillion Dollar budget as Xmas presents for the voters in each of their
states so they can get re-elected. If you think $1.1 Trillion is a big
debt, unfunded future liabilities bring the US Total Indebtedness to over $250
Trillion -- yes, you heard that right, a quarter of a Quadrillion Dollars in
unfunded DEBT. The National Debt. Your Debt that you didn't even
vote for. We haven't seen numbers like this since the Weimar Republic
in Germany just before WW II, during which a loaf of bread rose to billions
of dollars per loaf and the Weimar Republic issued Trillion Dollar Reich
Notes printed up on only one side to save the cost of ink and doled out to
workers' wives so they could dash to the stores with wheelbarrows loaded
with money to exchange their worthless currency for tangible commodities as
the currency was changing value hourly. The entire middle class in
Germany was wiped out in the 1920's and Obama and his Gang with the Federal
Reserve and Congress are trying their damnedest to wipe out the middle class
in American today because clever Obama thinks America is guilty of
"colonialism" and must be
dragged down to the gutter where his economic mind prattles along in the
gutters of state collectivism, muttering
19th century Marxist sophisms like the labor theory of value, minimum wages,
zero sum wealth, and redistribution of other people's wealth, the producers,
based upon altruistic needs of whoever the government declares is currently
-- it changes daily -- the
neediest. Who is John Galt? Better yet, where is Ragnar
Danneskjold, Atlas Shrugged's pirate for free markets? The murderous socialist government of Cuba can go
straight to hell. Barack Obama just made a stupid deal with the Devil,
disregarding all the people who the Castro Regime has robbed, raped, and murdered over the
last 50 years. Some Libertarians such as Rand Paul should not try to
play theoretician by claiming that free markets defeat dictators.
America is a prime example of how that isn't true. One-sided imaginary
free markets only make dictators wealthier at the expense of the continual
enslavement of the citizens because the dictators grab off all the cookies
in the fake free trade agreements. Freedom requires self-defense
against those who initiated the use of force and fraud, namely the
dictators. Rand and other Tea Partiers will soon find out that the
force of self defense -- such as impeachment -- will probably be necessary
to stop our current American Dictator, as well as Cuba's. Fake free
trade and capitulation to bullies are not the answer. Why are we not shocked about Obama's foreign policies?
He holds the same moral and economic philosophy as Fidel Castro.
La cage aux folles, birds of a feather flock together.
Dec 16, 2014 Ho hum, once again for the last 50 years or more, it
really doesn't matter which major political party is voted into office.
Virtually nobody in the US understands why it always ends up the same,
because virtually nobody in the US understands that the nation's central
bankers, not the politicians, are actually running The Big Show. Who are the central
bankers and what are they doing? The US central bank is the Federal
Reserve. The Federal Reserve is not a government entity. It is a
private cartel that has taken over as America's national bank. Central bankers are those bankers who
have convinced nations that said nations need a national bank to fund and
nation. Central bankers are private cartels of bankers who, through
national legislatures, have obtained the power to print and coin a nation's
medium of economic exchange, loosely called money.
The US Treasury has essentially been relegated to the role of printer for
the Federal Reserve, using the Bureau of Printing and Engraving for
expanding paper and fake coins when the Fed says so. The Federal Reserve is not responsible to the US
Legislature or any government agency and has never been audited.
Let me repeat: YOUR national
central bank, the Federal Reserve, has never been audited. You do not
know how much money they have actually created, or in what format, or where
they are spending it. If any business in the free market refused to be
audited, they would have their corporate and other licenses pulled, their
business shut down, and the corporate officers would be prosecuted and sent
to jail. The Federal Reserve has been
active over the last 100 years in redefining the study of economics at all
universities here and abroad. The goal of the Federal Reserve has been
to destroy the entire philosophy of individual rights and free market
capitalism. In its place, the Federal Reserve has implemented state
collectivist economics departments at all US universities and makes sure that Phds
economics department teach state collectivist crap and win Nobel Prizes for
their gobble-dee-goop baloney that passes for quantitative economic modeling
and such. Congressmen want to spend as much money as possible as a
bribe to receive votes from their constituents and they use the private Federal Reserve cartel
to provide the fake money for them, money that has no backing, no
collateral. Current economic thought by all major universities has devolved
down to the level of convincing the useful idiots in politics and the
American public that
counterfeiting a nation's medium of economic exchange is a positive act and
will make everybody healthy, wealthy, and wise. It's called a
"stimulus" and is a financial joke. However, once the people
believe this, and they have, the politicians are off and running
like little lemmings leaping off the edge of a financial cliff to print
up/create as much counterfeit money as possible in all sorts of ways from
dumping gold and silver as the collateral for our national debt, to fractional
reserve banking (printing up paper receipts for non-existent collateral,
which is called counterfeiting because they're receipts for nothing), and
creating mortgage and other so-called derivatives with no backing, another
What does the Federal Reserve gain? The counterfeit money that the Fed
creates is "borrowed" (from nowhere since there is no collateral) in the name of the American people, who
are then charged interest for this forced "borrowing" while being taxed
in the future to
repay this "national debt." What a brilliant Ponzi Scheme.
Create money out of nowhere, loan it to the suckers via Congress, charge
them interest, and call it a National Debt. In fact, the Federal
Reserve does not care a whit about whether Americans pay back the "National
Debt" monetary principle because the central bankers want this Ponzi Scheme to go on forever as the
Federal Reserve lives off the interest.
One could say that the Federal Reserve is a Perpetual Monetary Interest
Generating Machine, an Interest Generator. When they finish trashing
the housing mortgage market, they move to the education market:
student loans. When they finish sucking the blood out of the students'
parents, they move over to Obama's medical market. It never ends.
Congress passes new laws to presumably "solve" each monetary "crisis" --
blamed on Humpty Dumpty or Alice in Wonderland -- and the EXEMPTED Federal
Reserve move on to their next target. Ain's those central bankers
brilliant? The monetary principle doesn't matter.
It was just made up out of
nowhere anyway. It can be defaulted upon and new debt can be created
by the private cartel of National Bankers. This is how the Federal
Reserve is fleecing the American people; the Bank of the European Union
is doing the same in Europe; the Bank of Japan is doing the same in Japan;
the Bank of England is doing the same in Great Britain; and ad infinitum in
The central bankers in communist nations such as Russia and China are
already, by definition, private central banks pulling off the same state
collectivist crap that the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Europe, the Bank of Japan, and the
Bank of England are doing. By definition, all central banks are simply
illegal extensions, private cartels of bankers, of one or more state
collectivist nations managing their respective economies. Hence there
is no free market. There are only controlled markets. Controlled
by the central bankers who control their respective government. That's why it doesn't matter which major
political party "wins" a national election. Because the central banks
are busy running every nation's economy and the politicians are simply
sucking up the money as national debt and dishing it out as Xmas presents to
voters to maintain their political existence. The people
never see this banking activity going on behind the scenes, nor are they
interested in economics. Instead,
the little suckers simply choose up sides in the fake war between each major
political party, scream and yell at each other during election time, and then run off to vote
for one of the two major parties in
the national elections. The Republicans are RINOs and the Democrats
are DINOs (Republicans in Name Only and Democrats In Name Only).
They're all state collectivists telling you that your highest moral
philosophy in life is sacrifice yourself for the "good of the collective."
You know, like Obamacare's new tax call "Shared Responsibility." Yeah,
right out of Karl Marx's Playbook: Socialism For Dummies. The concepts of individualism
and free market capitalism are deader n' a door nail. George Bush, a
Republican, is no different than Barack Obama, a Democrat socialist. Barack Obama,
a Democrat socialist, is no different
than Mitt Romney, a Republican socialist (elcome to Romneycare in
Taxachussetts). Mitt Romney, a Republican socialist, is no different than Hillary Clinton,
a socialist socialist. And
whoever becomes president in 2016 will be no different than any previous
candidate in either major political party -- unless some Libertarian Tea
Party fluke happens to stumble into the presidency by accident -- because we
must all pay the private central bankers running America, Europe, Japan,
England, and all the other nations in the world. The Federal Reserve
has taken one pink slip for one '57 Chevy and counterfeited it over 250
trillion times, distributing it throughout the country and telling us how
rich we all are. Billions of people are now holding a fake receipt for
that same one and only '57 Chevy. Just wait. When they try to turn it in for the
real car, of which there is only one, and which is not redeemable anyway, they will soon find out that nobody holds the pink slip for
anything except a bunch of hot air from Congress and whoever is President of
the United States. That is the nature of central banking and only one
President of the United States was able to abolish America's first (or 2nd) round
with US central banking circa the 1860s: Andrew Jackson. But then,
in 1914,... the Federal Reserve, like Godzilla, re-emerged from the economic swamps
of 19th century Marxist sophisms. Marxist socialism. Keynesian
economics. Jonathan Gruber phony baloney national health care,
modeling. Welcome to the Federal Reserve and why it doesn't matter
which major political party you vote for -- until you END THE FED.
Until the US implements true free market capitalism with real money and real
free market bankers instead of the crony socialist bankers running the
Federal Reserve and pulling the puppet strings of Congress and the
President, the US economy will continue to rise and collapse, rise and
collapse, along with all social
order. Look for an economic riot to come to a city near you... soon.
Dec 13, 2014 OK, everybody, refresh my brain. Did we not just
conduct a 2014 midterm election in which the American people voted against
Obama's illegal immigrant amnesty, against Obamacare, against the Obama
Administration's handling of the economy? So, now that the Republicans
gained 9 US Senate seats to take over the US Senate, more seats in the US
House, obtained 35 governorships out of 50 states, and a majority in most
state legislatures, how is it that yesterday US GOP House Majority Leader,
John Boehner, and US GOP Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, caved in
and voted YES for an unprecedented $1.1 Trillion budget that funds
EVERYTHING that the Obama Administration and the Democrats wanted? Did
we just slip into some sort of alternate universe in which the now majority
GOP doesn't understand what the American voters just said? It's only
been less than a month. What happened to all the rhetoric by the GOP
leaders that they could cut Obamacare and illegal EO Amnesty by not funding
those portions of the budget? Did they lie? Did they forget?
Or are they just RINOs, Republicans in Name Only? What happened to the
impeachment of Obama for illegally using EOs to (1) illegally legislate
portions of Obamacare and (2) grant amnesty to the illegal immigration of 5
million to 20 million people running across our southern border? If Obamacare is not repealed in 2015, if Obama's illegal use of EOs do not
bring about impeachment proceedings, then one of several things could
happen: (1) the people will simply revolt in some type of civil
war against the Obama government, or (2) the Democrats will wipe out all the
current gains made by the GOP in 2014 and usher in more of the same old
state collectivist left Liberal crap, electing another dictator such as
Hillary Clinton or worse, if that's possible. And that is the current state of our Union:
namely, so far there is no difference between the lying Republicans and the lying
Democrats. They could both be called the Demopubs or Republicrats.
Or how about just plain old "lying rectums."
Dec 13, 2014 Whoa, pull up the barn floor, shut up, and pour
yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends. What's all
this crap about the Democrats in the US Senate releasing a report -- from
California Senator Diane Feinstein's little group of office girls -- bashing
the CIA for torturing Middle East terrorists in order to find out what
further dastardly deeds they (the terrorists) were about to pull off
immediately after said terrorists killed 3,000 Americans when they blew up
the World Trade Centers in The Big Apple on Sep 11, 2001? And
President Obama and VP Joe Biden had to chime in to claim that Americans
must confess to the immoral values for what the CIA did: slapping the
terrorists silly for a coupla minutes, making them stand on one foot
listening to old Michael Jackson tunes, sleep deprivation, and
water-boarding? Obama and Biden are correct in that the actions of the
CIA represent moral values but Obama, Biden, and Feinstein have their moral
accusations backwards. It is the terrorists whose moral values are
corrupt, not the CIA's moral values or the American people's values.
Let's quickly analyze what values we're talking about here, folks.
Given: Each individual has the inherent right to life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness and that is a moral value based upon individual rights
moral philosophy. Individuals who initiate
the use of force or fraud against others automatically forfeit their same rights.
Those who are attacked are called victims and have the right of
self-defense. Those who do the attacking are called perps and have
forfeited their rights. In the crime of murder, the victims, that's
the American people in this case, have the right to use any means necessary
for self defense. We are not talking about water-boarding some poor
camel driver for swiping a lollipop from Seven-Eleven. We're talking
about mass murder and further terrorist acts including nuclear bombs by the
terrorists. President Obama, VP Joe
Biden, Diane Feinstein and all the little propeller beanie brain Liberals in the media
have it backwards: the victims, not the perpetrators of terrorist acts, have
the moral right of self defense and thus have the right to kick the
terrorists' butts, including water boarding, to prevent further acts of murder. Releasing this
CIA report is an attempt by the Obama Administration and others to blur the
distinction between who is the victim and who is the perp, between inherent
individual rights of self-defense and forfeited rights of the perp, and thus
blur the moral philosophical distinction between correct values and
incorrect values. This is a shabby ploy by state collectivists,
reminiscent of all
the dictators in the past and currently the Obama Administration, to blame
the victims and grant the moral high ground to the perps. Obama uses
this same method in his Marxist Class Warfare rhetoric between the so-called haves
and have-nots, implying that the rights of the "neediest" supersede the
rights of the producers. He also uses this method in his Karl Marx
Racist Warfare: implying that individuals obtain their rights form an
ethnic group instead of inherently from God or Nature, and that the rights of an ethnic group supersede the
rights of the individual, even in self-defense. In each case, the
victim has been turned into the perp, and the perp has been turned into the
poor victim. Welcome to George Orwell's "1984" where war is peace, lies are the truth,
and wrong is right. Do we see a trend here? You bet.
Individual rights vs. state collectivism. Altruistic state
collectivism at that. In the CIA case, it's individual rights of
self-defense vs. the state collectivist rights of the gang, the mob, the
group we call terrorists. Oh, the poor victims, the terrorists, claim Obama and his cronies.
If one didn't know any better, one would guess that Obama is busy rooting
for the terrorists. Our Imperial President, VP Biden, Senator Feinstein
and others in the US news media do not want you to distinguish the
difference between an objective right and wrong. They want to destroy
your concept of moral values by switching who is the victim and who is the perp. Just like in the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of self-defense and
ensuing race riots created by the race baiters such as Al Sharpton and Obama, just like the illegal granting of amnesty with an EO
for 5-20 million illegal immigrants, and now the CIA using self-defense to
obtain further terrorist info from THE PERPs who bombed the World Trade
Center. The irony in all of this is that the so-called supporters of
the concept of individual rights, the Conservatives, have not caught on to
this ruse by Obama, Biden, and Senator Feinstein. This shabby tactic
is called, as Ayn
Rand pointed out some time ago: "obtaining the sanction of your
victims." The victims are those who have not thought through the moral
philosophy of individual rights, why victims retain rights of self-defense
while perps forfeit their rights. Neither the American people or the CIA
have lost their moral values and do not need to apologize for water-boarding
Sheik Ali Baba to find out if he and the terrorists had any nukes or chemical or
biological bombs ready to explode in the US. They had already blown up
the World Trade Centers and thus, as terrorists, HAVE NO RIGHTS. So, President Obama,
Vice President Joe Biden, and Dingbat Senator Diane Ficklebrain can stop
riding their moral cotton ponies backwards and get with the American program:
it's called objective reality and our moral philosophy is inherent individual rights
and freedoms, obtained from God or Nature, not the government, not President
Obama. And that's the name of that tune, Senator Finkle-dinkle-brain,
and your secret ass report from Congress.
Dec 06, 2014 All dictatorial tyrants throughout history -- from King
George to Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao-Tse-Tung, Fidel Castro, the
list goes on and on -- have one particular trait in common: they just
know they're right AND they, therefore, have convinced themselves that they
must take over all aspects of the government in order to implement their
"good intentions" for all the masses. Oh, thank you, thank you,
for your "good intentions."
Stage front and center, in walks President Barack Obama who not only has
overtly taken over the US Legislative Branch of government by issuing
countless numbers of illegal Executive Orders, but who is now also overtly
trying to take over the third branch of government, the Judicial Branch, by
showing up on national TV -- for starters -- and countermanding the verdicts
of at least two grand juries in various cities across the United States so
start race riots.
It doesn't matter what the juries decided, innocent or guilty. What
matters is that the President of the United States -- head of the Executive
Branch of government -- has no authority to usurp the US Constitution's
checks and balances between our three branches of government.
President Obama does not obtain authority from either the Constitution or
its founding documents, the Federalist Papers, or any other statutes, to
reprimand, revoke, or try to retry the findings of 12 Americans sitting on a
grand jury looking at evidence that the President has not seen but is busy trying to
second guess their verdict. The reason why the Constitution
establishes jury trials by citizens rather than by King George, Adolph
Hitler, Fidel Castro, Mao-Tse-Tung, Vladimir Putin or President Whomever of
the United States is precisely what Obama is attempting to fundamentally
change. We had an American Revolution over this concept over 230 years
ago. Was Barack Obama out to lunch or fell asleep in his Harvard Law
Class 101A on the US Constitution's Separation of Powers Lecture? We
dumped Britain's King George, who was a dictatorial tyrant, for doing
exactly what President Obama now wants to reinstitute for himself as Emperor
of the United States. Look at Obama's actions. First, he
illegally uses EOs to circumvent the Legislative Branch to issue his own
laws and, in the case of ObamaCare, completely rewrite entire portions of
the law without Congress. Now he uses his Oval Office to dispatch DOJ Attorney General
Eric Holder to circumvent the Judicial Branch of government while he shows
up on national TV to retry already-decided grand jury verdicts by yelling
"Racism!" (when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary) to incite
race riots until he gets his way. President Obama is now overtly
acting exactly like all historical tyrants who just know that they're right.
And if the masses refuse to obey the Emperor, then he will show them a thing
or two. Such as how he can take over both the Legislative and Judicial
Branches of government, merging all three branches into his Exclusive
Executive Branch. After all, Obama knows what is best for everybody in
America because he has "good intentions" and has a "pen and a phone" quote
unquote... and is forming a civilian military to take over the function of
the US military. I'm surprised Obama hasn't appointed an officer in
charge of emptying garbage cans in Boise, Idaho. He's got his sticky
little fingers in everything else for chrissake... When will Obama's
tyrannical temper tantrums end? When the US Congress grows enough
cajones to impeach Emperor Obama because he is not going to voluntarily
Dec 06, 2014 Did President Obama already sign an EO granting amnesty
to 5 million or more illegal immigrants or not? Sources say it has not
been filed in the Federal Register or elsewhere, yet. Yet. Maybe
the Obama Administration lost it with the 2,700 pages of IRS documents they
illegally obtained from the IRS to target their political enemies, who
knows? At any rate, why is House Squeaker John Boehner refusing to
issue a federal budget in which he can defund Obama's supposed new EO that
grants amnesty to illegals? It's really easy. All Boehner has to
do is write in to the budget bill how much money can be used for
implementation of Obama's illegal EO while fully funding the rest of the
2015 budget. So what if it doesn't pass the Senate and/or President
Obama vetoes the budget bill? That's on the Democrats, not the GOP as
the Senate and President Obama will take the hit for shutting down the
government. This is an important constitutional issue that the people
of America have just told the GOP in the 2014 midterm elections that they
want taken care of: no more abuse of power by President
Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong. On the same front, it's time for the US
House to implement impeachment proceedings against President Obama for his
multitudinous abuses of power, especially his latest EO to grant amnesty to
millions of illegals who dashed over the border from Mexico. As the
Constitution states, and the Federalist Papers give the reasons for, the US
President can be impeached at any time, the US House initiating the
procedure and the US Senate trying the impeachment case. In addition,
the President and any Executive Officer is liable after an impeachment to be
tried in the regular court system for any civil or criminal offenses that
the President may have committed while in office. Impeachment simply
removes a guilty Officer from his public office and can terminate all
pensions or other emoluments received or to be received from said office.
By the way, impeachment of any Judicial Branch officer (judges, etc.) is
initiated in the same manner. Just thought you
might want to drop this trivia pursuit on some of your left Liberal
Democratic Progressive weenie-brained friends at dinner next week.
Nov 29, 2014 After President Obama was caught on video over 25 times
stating why he has no authority to grant amnesty to over 5 million (or more)
illegal immigrants who ran across our southern border from Mexico, one
wonders why he walked onto national TV and tap danced 180 degrees stating
that all of a sudden he had all the authority in the world to issue an
Executive Order granting amnesty to said illegals. Could it be that
President Obama is simply issuing an EO to establish his own pathway to US
citizenship? After all, it has never been settled whether Obama is a
legal citizen of the United States or not. Is there a clause in his
recent illegal EO that provides a pathway to citizenship for Kenyans?
Do Obama's two daughters qualify as "anchor babies" to allow President Obama
to remain in the US because his daughters were born in America? Do
"anchor babies" qualify as establishing citizenship for illegals -- e.g.
Barack Obama -- to then run for President of the United States?
Inquiring minds want to know. One thing is for sure: all the US
Congress has to do to block Obama's latest EO on granting amnesty to
illegals is to repeal the statute upon which his EO is based. No
statute, no EO. It's just that simple. Will Congress do it?
Nov 14, 2014 Pull up the barn floor, shut up, and pour yourselves
another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends. ObamaCare just got a lot
more interesting. It seems that MIT quantitative economist -- as
opposed to Austrian Free Market Qualitative Economists -- has confessed at
least three times on three different nationally televised videos that, as
the major architect of Obama's so-called Affordable Care Act, he
deliberately tricked the American public who he stated was "stupid" into
voting for the ACA by purposely misrepresenting what it was and how it was
going to be paid for. Said the good professor, the American voters are
so "stupid" that the way to sell the ACA was to claim that the government
was going to tax the health insurance companies but -- as Gruber laughingly
pointed out in his lecture -- knowing full well that the insurance companies
must pass the higher costs along to the consumers. Ha Ha. Those
dumb ass voters, he inferred. Gruber snickered that one of his
purposes was to make the ACA so incomprehensible that nobody would even know
what it said because the entire exercise was to nationalize health care and
move the ACA into a federal single payer program anyway. So now we
have the major ObamaCare architect -- a Keynesian economist from MIT --
confessing that he was paid by the Obama Administration to trick the
"stupid" public into voting yes for ObamaCare by lying to them. This
confession shows that President Obama was complicit, along with House Leader
Nancy Pelosi who stated at a previous press conference that Gruber was the
main author of ObamaCare, and that he, Obama, knew full well that he was
lying to the public about virtually every aspect of his national socialist
health care program. The irony of it all? It is Professor
Jonathan Gruber who is the stupid idiot, not the American public, who by the
way, just voted last week in Midterm Elections against everything the Obama
administration stood for. Gruber, for one, is too stupid to know the
difference between real economics and Keynesian bullshit. He is stupid
for getting a Phd in bankrupt quantitative economics, which most economists
who know anything about the Austrian School of Thought, would simply call
Physconomics -- the quantitative school of thought that thinks that economics follows the same
laws (the methodology) as the physical sciences and thus can be mathematically modeled.
Gruber does not
understand that free market economics is actually a myriad of qualitative
consumer priorities that cannot be studied in the same manner as the
physical and life sciences because the reasoning methodology for economics
is not conducive to quantitative measurements such as E=mc2, F=ma, or any
economic algebraic/calculus formula.
The best that can be said of MIT Prof Gruber's quantitative economic
methodologies -- and others' like him such as Paul Krugman -- is that they
are simply making up economic models based upon historical commodity prices,
none of which foretell future consumer actions in a qualitative market place
comprised of trillions of daily economic decisions. So, the joke is
twofold: Prof Gruber is the "stupid" economic idiot because his plans,
well-intentioned or not, could never come to fruition for the same reasons
that no socialist program can succeed in the market, and two, the stupid
professor just confessed to his lies in front of 315 million Americans, thus
dragging President Barack Obama into this nefarious lime light. What a
dummy the good professor is. And how stupid was presidential candidate
Mitt Romney in hiring Phd economist Jonathon Gruber to pull the same lying
tricks to implement RomneyCare in the state of Taxachussetts? Caution
Republican congressmen: Jump into bed with the Democrat Progressive
Socialists and you earn the title of RINO, Republican In Name Only.
Welcome to the Big Lie of ObamaCare, the Un-Affordable Care Joke.
Nov 11, 2014 Happy Veterans Day! On that note, let's talk about
how Obama's Sec of Veterans Affairs, Robert MacDonald, is going to clean up
the complete total failure of America's Veterans Hospitals across the
nation. He wants to start by firing at least a thousand employees in
the bureaucratic mess we call Veterans Hospitals. Will that work?
Absolutely not. Why? Because the root cause of the incompetency,
the fake lists of veterans waiting for care, the lying, cheating, and
general mismanagement of this huge national hospital system has nothing to
do with its employees per se. The problem is, quite simply:
socialism. The Veterans Hospital system is a complete bureaucratic
failure for the same reason that Amtrak, our nationalized train system, the
US Post Office, our nationalized communications system, Public Education,
our nationalize school system, and all nationalized state collectivist
bureaus must always fail. Socialist bureaus are not meant to respond
to the clients, the consumers of their services. They are established
in order to respond to the government. And the government is not a
free market entity. There is no profit and loss accounting in
government agencies. Therefore, there is no incentive for government
employees to cut costs, invent new methods, or do anything whatsoever except
collect their paychecks and complain that it's not enough. The
solution to the Veterans Hospital fiasco is to sell this system to free
market hospitals and get the government out of the business of trying to
play medical care. Oh yoo-hoo! Does this ring a bell? The
Veterans Hopital debacle is the same reason why we should repeal ObamaCare:
because it, too, will end up just like our Veterans Hospital system only
much much worse because it covers the entire medical system of the United
States. We can no more fix our Veterans Hospital system, or Amtrak, or
the US Post Office, or the US Public Education system by rearranging the
deck chairs on each of their respective Titanics than we can "solve" or
"fix" any socialist bureaucracy. The government has only one function:
using its collective coercive power of LIMITED force to protect each
individual's inherent rights at both the national and international level.
It is not the function of government to try and participate in the free
market, any more than it would be the function of football referees to
actually participate in playing the game they are supposed to be refereeing.
Should the government pay for veterans' private hospital care? Yes.
Should the government try to run Veterans Hospitals? No. Happy
Veterans Day and don't forget to go hug a veteran today. Or tomorrow.
And the next day.
Nov 09 Talk Show hosts Rush Limbaugh, Dinesh D'Souza, Michael Savage,
Glenn Beck, Judge Janine Pirro and this web site all concur that last week's shellacking of
Democratic candidates in the 2014 Midterm elections is not the result of
voters demanding that Republicans and Democrats in Congress come together
with Dictator Obama -- cum-bi-yah -- but rather it is a demand for the US
Congress to STOP and REPEAL Obama's previous and continuing socialist state
collectivism that is destroying America and the Middle Class.
President Obama showed zero remorse and willingness to undo any of his past
social political economic interventionism into individual rights and the
free market. Those Conservatives who are shocked by Obama's unchanging
attitude still don't understand his ideology and what drives him.
Obama is a true believer of 1930's and 1940's state collectivism:
German socialism, Italian fascism, and USSR communism. He believes in
all the state collectivist claptrap of Marxist socialism and the neocolonial
absurdities taught to him by his communist mother and father and other
collectivist mentors. He actually believes in already disproven
economic sophisms such as wealth being a finite quantity and thus must have
been stolen by the wealthy and needs to be redistributed to others, that
minimum wages increase jobs when, in fact, it causes unemployment, that
trade barriers make nations richer when, in fact, trade protectionism hurts
citizens of both trading nations, that value resides in labor per se when, in truth,
value resides in the qualitative expectation of the consumers on both sides
of a trade not in labor performed, and on and on through standard Marxist baloney economics.
Acting on this ideology, President Obama will not change his dictatorial
actions because he is convinced that he is absolutely correct. He is
on a religious mission -- socialism being his religion -- to right all the
alleged wrongs that his teachers have taught him are the fault of America
and the free market. In this sense, Obama is not
intelligent, he is not smart, he is, in fact, rather stupid because -- in
spite of all the available data and results of his previous actions -- he is
unable and unwilling to conclude that his Marxist ideology is incorrect.
He is unable to learn from his mistakes. That's OK in his personal
life, he has the right to be wrong as much as he wants. But not when
it affects the entire American economy and causes millions to lose their
health insurance, doctors, jobs, and lives overseas in ridiculous Middle
East Wars and his continuing support of the Muslim Brotherhood. So the upshot for the GOP that just won the 2014 Elections
is that they should not try to compromise with President Obama.
He is absolutely wrong in virtually every area he has intervened into. It is the
GOP's voter mandate to STOP Obama, REPEAL Obama's illegal Executive
Orders, and, in fact, do everything possible to remove him from the highest
office in the land which he has forfeited all rights to occupy by his
previous disastrous and illegal actions. And that is the direction
that Obama is leading the US Congress: impeachment, just around the
corner. And deservedly so.
Nov 05 Today's Headlines: "Americans Vote
Against Obama's Socialism." In a landslide vote yesterday in
the 2014 Midterm Elections, the Republican Party overwhelmingly expressed
their disapproval of President Obama's social political economic policies,
ObamaCare (socialist health care fiasco)
2. The Benghazi Ambassador murders/cover up
3. Deserter Bergdahl trade for 5 Muslim terrorists
4. IRS targeting of GOP politicians
5. NSA spying on all Americans' phones, etc.
6. Veteran hospital fake lists and no care
7. Ebola virus do-nothing, no quarantine
8. Takeover GM, give investor money to unions
9. No budget for the last 6 years
10. DOJ Eric Holder do-nothing against criminals
11. Allowing 10 million+ illegal immigrants
12. Losing US arms & billions of $ to Muslim BH
13. Allow Fed Reserve to create Trillions in debt
14. And the list goes on and on...
On the national
scene, the US House gained 12 additional seats for a total of 242.
Demos dropped to 193. The US Senate gained 7 GOP seats for a majority
total of 53 Republicans, dumping current Democratic Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid into the garbage dump of statist history. The Democrats
have a minority of 46 Senate seats. None of the three candidates for
Louisiana's US Senate seat received 50% of the vote and thus a run-off
between incumbent Mary Landrieu and her GOP opponent next Dec 6 will occur.
Projections are a GOP win with a loss by Landrieu as the Independent/GOP
split vote that Landrieu ran against will mostly go to the major GOP
candidate. That means the US Senate will increase its majority status
to 54 GOP. Sen Mitch McConnell stands to become Senate Majority Leader
in 2015, although there exist rumblings that Sen Ted Cruz of Texas may
challenge that position. GOP governors increased by 10 or so, giving
the GOP 35 out of 50 governorships across our 50-state Union.
This loss by the left Liberal Democrats/Progressives is a clear referendum
against the state collectivist policies of the Obama administration and a
pro vote for individual rights, private property rights, and the middle
class that President Obama is hell-bent on destroying by whatever means
possible. Now it's up to the GOP and its various constituent Tea Party
and Conservative members to pull the RINOs in the GOP toward our Founding
Fathers' ideology: namely, the idea that all
individuals are born with inherent individual rights and thus must take
responsibility for exercising those rights. Step One: time to
undo all the harmful and intrusive governmental statism that the Obama
Administration has tried to shove down our throats over the last six years.
Time for Obama to step down and relegate his legacy to the garbage dump of
failed state collectivism.
Oct 26, 2014 What a coinkydink! President Obama's White House
last Friday interrupted US Congress's committee meeting on the US Ebola
crisis to show a photo op of Obama hugging miraculously-cured nurse Nina
Pham in the Oval Office of the White House. Just last week all the
major TV networks interviewed Ms. Pham was laying in a hospital bed,
quarantined -- supposedly -- with the deadly, lethal, watch-out-now Ebola
virus. Suddenly, Ms. Pham jumped up out of bed, totally cured, and was
whisked away to the White House where she schmoochie schmooched in a photo
op with Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong. Wow. Tell me this was not
staged by the Hollywood script writers, just before the 2014 midterm
elections. News Flash!! Obama saves world from Ebola epidemic.
Vote for the Democrats! Yahoo and Hallelujah!
Oct 25, 2014 Did I wake up this morning on Planet Mars?
Something stinks in Denmark. And in the US. The big news item of
the day shows President Barack Obama hugging Ebola virus victim nurse Nina
Pham in the Oval Office of the White House. The news article goes on
to claim that nurse Pham -- who was in quarantine last week -- miraculously
got rid of ALL traces of the Ebola virus and is now just hunky dory AOK.
All this in
about a week after being transferred to Emery (?) Hospital and supposedly
receiving a blood transfusion from one of the also "cured" doctors who came
back from West Africa after being infected by the Ebola virus and given a
new untested anti-Ebola vaccine. Second Ebola-infected nurse who
worked with now dead from Ebola virus, a patient named Mr. Duncan, has also
allegedly overcome this "lethal" virus and also reports no trace of the
Ebola virus in her body, too. Wow, what miraculous recoveries from
what the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the majority of doctors
world-wide have claimed is (or was) a lethal virus with no cure --
except within the last two weeks apparently, just in time for a front page
photo op with President Barack Obama. Whoop-tee-doo, if you believe in
coincidences and miracles. And now, Canadian health organizations claim they have
had vaccinations for Ebola since forever and sent a million shots to the World Health Organization
for West Africa but it seems like nobody received these wonderful cures
since some 5,000 West Africans have recently died from Ebola. What did
the doctors -- both American and others in West Africa -- do with these
vials, drink them down at breakfast with their orange juice or flush them
down the toilet? Oh that's right. There are no toilets in Third
World West Africa. Why didn't anybody give these wonderful antibodies
to poor Mr. Duncan who lied his way into the United States from Liberia,
only to drop dead from his Ebola virus at Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas,
Texas? Why am I suspicious that maybe the two nurses didn't really
have Ebola and were simply sent to the hospital where -- in record time,
less than the 21 days of standard quarantine -- they miraculously recovered
just in time for a photo op with Dictator President Barack Obama one week before the
2014 midterm Elections? How convenient. Front page news. And now, US
pharmaceutical companies are all claiming they can ship "the Ebola cure" to
everybody in the country by early 2015. Holy moly! Sounds like
two movies: "V is for Vendetta" and "Wag The Dog." Meanwhile
Governors Christie of New Jersey and Dinkleberry of New York have just
issued travel bans and quarantines for their respective states because
another doctor from West Africa showed up to New York infected with Ebola.
He rode on
the airlines, jumped in a taxi, ate at some restaurant, went bowling, and
then notified the authorities that he sort of quarantined himself by taking
his own temperature (103 deg F) each day for a week. Really?
What a busy quarantine that was. Hasn't this newly infected doctor and
the governors of New Jersey and New York heard the great news? There
is no possibility of an Ebola outbreak in the US because all ya gotta do is
get a blood transfusion from one of the initial doctors returning from West
Africa -- like the two nurses hugging Obama in the Oval Office of the White
House did -- and you will miraculously be cured in less than a week, yippee, yahoo, and lah-dee-dah. Somebody somewhere in the medical community, the CDC, the
WHO, President Obama, and whoever else are either lying through their teeth
or we are totally mis-communicating our knowledge about the Ebola virus all
over the Internet, major TV news media, and through the Obama
Administration's White House. Wow! Are we living back in the
lies and propaganda of the USSR or on planet Mars or where? Good thing
we're implementing a National Socialist Health Care system: ObamaCare.
I suppose you can keep your Ebola virus if you want to, along with your
doctor who apparently doesn't know crap about what's happening with Ebola,
much less your diabetes Type II.
Oct 17, 2014 Welcome to Hidden Springs, Idaho, the HOA from hell!
No, it's not all of the Hidden Springs Town Association (HSTA) members in
the HOA that are from hell. It's the current and many past Hidden
Springs Town Council members who fall into the category from Hades. So
whatsa hoppenink at Hidden Springs, 3-4 miles outside of Boise? Seems
like the Town Manager -- employed some 5-6 years through the HOA management
group AMI -- has been charged with, and is currently being investigated for, allegedly
pilfering HSTA funds from the Home Owners Association. Imagine that.
according to information released by the HS Town Council at a meeting held last
Wednesday. Having served as one of five Town Council
members for this very same HOA from hell for a full year in 2011 -- after which we
moved -- I know all the players, past and present, and did my best to
implement HOA Best Practices for the HSTA, such as obtaining annual
financial audits (they had never had an audit), obtain fidelity insurance in
case of embezzlement or theft (we had several million in HOA funds), obtain
spare parts and pumps for the HSTA's self-owned sewer plant, and various
other Best Practices. Unfortunately, I was met with total resistance
from the other four Town Council members I served with and even had to walk to 850 homes
with a petition to prevent the Board from investing over $350,000 of HOA
funds into the stock market, which would have risked principal and interest.
My wife and I, and a few friends,
stopped the other HS Town Council members from this imprudent crap shoot but
not without a lot of argument and infighting. The other four 2011 town
council members continually voted "no" for a full annual audit and "no" to purchasing fidelity
insurance against embezzlement and theft. There were numerous other issues
that I do not have time to go into, but suffice it to say that various Town
Council members were currently, or historically, engaging in conflict of
interest activities and/or unethical acts. While I had many suspicions
that certain individuals from the Town Manager to Town Council members may
have engaged in illegal financial activities, I had no real proof, and thus
could only call for a forensic audit which, again, all the other 2011 TC
members as well as 2012, 2013, and 2014 TC members turned down. Fast
forward to today, October 2014. Lo and behold, the Hidden Springs town
council just called an emergency meeting to tell the HSTA membership that
their town manager of 5-6 years has been fired and felony charges of theft
or embezzlement have been instigated with the Boise, Idaho police
department. I will be opening a bottle of champagne with those who
tried to help me implement Best Practices at Hidden Springs, even though we
failed in some areas but succeeded in others. However, the
failure falls not on the alleged theft of HOA funds by a "trusted" town
manager, but rather on all the town council members I served with in 2011
and many previous town council members who continually said "no" to
implementing Best Practices, such as annual audits. Even today, after
the discovery of theft by the Town Manager, if you log onto the Hidden
Springs Facebook page, current and former town council members are busy claiming that nothing has gone wrong,
everything is A-OK, and that they still don't need a full forensic audit.
Really? That's like trying to convince robbery victims that they
really haven't been robbed, move along, everything's OK, nothing happening
here. Either they still don't get it, or,
is something else going on? Who knows? The take home message
here is: if you belong to an HOA from hell, the best thing you can do
is to attend a legal HOA seminar from a respectable HOA law firm at which they
can tell you how to run an HOA with Best Practices. As for those
Hidden Springs current and former town council members who are busy trying
to cover their asses and snow the entire HSTA membership by writing on the
Hidden Springs Facebook, the equivalent of "Nothing
happening here, move right along," methinks they do protesteth
too much. What are they trying to cover up? Follow the money.
That's why it is always prudent to implement an annual audit for your HOA...
especially if your HOA has never had an audit, not just a flimsy accounting
review that former Hidden Springs town council members said they did in
2012, what a joke, but also your HOA should purchase fidelity insurance.
Remember: liability insurance for your HOA does not cover embezzlement or theft. Only fidelity
insurance covers theft, including currently unknown historical theft that may be
discovered after the fact. All I can say is: Good luck to those
of my friends still living in Hidden Springs, the HOA from hell. Who
knows what this current investigation will uncover. I'm just glad my
wife and I sold our house in Hidden Springs and moved to a better place.
Oct 14, 2014 According to Col. Allen West, "The US Constitution,
Article I, Section VIII, Clause number four, says that only Congress has the
ability to make rules or laws regarding naturalization; President Obama does
not have that authority. So, when you go back and look at the
executive order issued by Obama, calling it a DREAM Act, you look at this
edict that he has sent down, it is an unlawful order.” Since the DREAM
Act is unlawful, nobody has to obey it.
Oct 08, 2014 According to a blurb on Facebook, "Their numbers grow in
every Western country, with Muslim births far outnumbering those of the
western nations, and Mohammad being the most popular baby name in London.
The Muslim population in some London hamlets is higher than
40%. Marseille, France
35%, Amsterdam, Netherlands 25%. And in
Dearborn, Michigan USA almost half the population
is Muslim according to the census. Their goal is not to live side by
side with the West but to convert the host nations by any means necessary.
It’s often called ‘creeping’ Sharia. Our elected officials and our courts
have failed to address Sharia in America. Bans on Sharia in the U.S. have
been challenged and are stalled in the courts. Political correctness shuts
down any debate over the dangers of Sharia in the West." Should we be
worried? You decide.
Oct 05, 2014 Should the US dash back into the Middle East and continue
fighting the Islamo fascists? Is this the same as the US having dashed
into Vietnam to fight the Commies? Are the underlying premises, self
defense, appropriate as reasons for entering either the Vietnam war or the
Middle East war? In Vietnam, a coalition of socialist/communist
nations -- North Vietnam, the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR),
and Communist China -- attached the rice farmers of South Vietnam. The
US came to the rice farmers' rescue, which was morally correct, self
defense, but the US did a horrible political job of implementing that war
and eventually lost. In Vietnam, the military was called "advisors."
The US military was not allowed to fight the Vietnam war either
strategically or tactically; US politicians ran and bungled the Vietnam War.
We supposed "partnered" with the South Vietnamese, trained their army, but
the South Vietnamese threw down their weapons and ran at the first sight of
their enemies. Why? Because they were just simple rice farmers
who had no clue what the war was all about -- an invasion by North Vietnam
and their communist allies. The South Vietnamese joined their army for
the money. Period. Now, here we are again, about 40 years later,
and the US is discussing whether we should "partner" with various factions
in the Middle East to fight against the Islamo fascists called ISIL.
The Islamo fascists are not doing anything different than the North
Vietnamese and their allies did in Vietnam. Both invading groups
initiated the use of force, torture, murder, rape, beheadings, etc. and both
groups are essentially a variation on the theme of state or church
collectivists. Socialists, communists, and Islamic Jihadists are all
the same, pushing a dog-eat-dog central government -- Communism or a
Caliphate -- with the rottenest dogs on top running the show. In both
cases all individuals -- in Vietnam and in the Middle East -- lose their
inherent rights, especially women, and there is no such thing as a free
market. While it is true that the US Federal Reserve had an initiating
role in the Middle East by creating the Petrol Dollar with OPEC and using
the US military to enforce its deal, the Obama Administration has totally
bungled the Middle East mess that was created by former Presidents George
Bush. This is not to say that the Islamo fascists were not already on
the war path against individuals and the concepts of individual rights and
free markets. But Obama has essentially given the ISIL fascists all
their military weapons and directly or indirectly provided financing for the
Islamos to conduct their war. The question remains: while it can
be argued that it is morally correct to help the individuals in the Middle
East against the invasion of a bunch of Islamos fascists, as well as
ensuring said Islamos do not jump to the US, just as it was morally correct
for the US and its allies to come to the aid of the South Vietnamese, if we
use the same political methodology in the Middle East as we did in Vietnam
-- partnering with the natives -- we will lose the war. Why? For
the same reason we could not "partner" with the South Vietnamese: like
the rice farmers in South Vietnam, the camel drivers in the Middle East have
no clue about the global ramification of what's going on and they are only
joining the army to receive the US dollar to feed their families.
They, too, will throw down their American weapons as soon as they see ISIL
coming over the hill. So, it appears that the US must either turn into
Roman soldiers and conquer the Middle East with a million troops on the
ground until we help them establish a real Constitution and Bill of Rights,
or we just pull out, protect our own borders, and say, "Adios, good luck!"
But the absolute worse thing we can do is exactly what President Obama is
doing today, kinda, sorta nothing, no objective, no strategy, and
socially-politically-economically stupid acts of dropping a couple of bombs
a day somewhere on somebody or an empty cardboard building. That's
what happens when (1) a neighborhood organizer (Barack Obama) instead of an
experienced military strategist tries to conduct a foreign war, and (2) our
President appears to lean so far toward what he thinks are "peaceful
Islamists" that his obvious turban is falling off his head. Obama the
Pied Piper is looking and acting more and more like a Trojan Horse from
Syria than anything else.
Oct 02, 2014 As mentioned previously in these pages, those of you who
love to have your pets lick your lips as an anthropomorphic "kiss," feed
them from your dinner plates or hands and then not wash up, sleep with them
in your bed, and generally allow your pets to run all over your house as if
they were your human children, should jump on the Web and Goggle the Center
for Disease Control (CDC) with a basic bacteriological/immunological
question: can viruses such as Ebola, polio, SARS, ENT D 68, and
bacteria such as salmonella jump species? That is, can viruses and
bacteria jump from animals to humans? And the answer is -- wait for
it, animal lovers, wait for it -- YES. Especially at risk are small
children from ages 0 to five years old, older individuals, and sick
individuals whose immune systems are already maxed out. Should you
break out the Lysol and slug down a bottle of Listerine? No, but
pretending that pets are humans and should be treated as humans is a form of
anthropomorphism, attributing human attributes to non-human pets or even
objects. The old wives' tale that one should purposely expose oneself
to lots of viruses and bacteria because that will build up one's immune
system is balderdash. The germ of truth that children can become
immune by allowing them to come into contact with other children with the
measles, etc., does not extrapolate to the general idea that it is good to
expose your children to all sorts of viruses and bacteria and live in
unhygienic environments. If exposing people to bacti and viruses was
wonderful, then we should allow pets to run all over the kitchens of
restaurants and hospital operating rooms where they can lick everybody's
dinner plates and the wounds and incisions of patients undergoing surgery.
Wow, everybody would build up really great immune systems, right?
Buzz, wrong! Americans today have become "pet happy" and have ignored
basic hygiene concepts of keeping their pets outside (warmed dog houses
during the winter), not allowing pets in kitchens, dining rooms, bathrooms,
and bedrooms and not "kissing" dogs and cats or sleeping with them.
Pets are great companions and we all lover them but they are not humans and
carry many diseases that can jump to humans. It took hundreds of years
after its initial discovery by Pasteur, Lister, and others for humans to
accept the fact that bacteria and viruses are little critters that can be
transmitted from person to person and animal to person and insect to person
and now, today, as the Ebola virus that has become an epidemic in North
Africa and carried by humans across the Atlantic to the United States, can
be transmitted in more ways than one: be aware; Ebola virus, for which
there is no known cure, can jump species from pets to humans as well as from
humans to humans. Woof, woof, and meow to those who refuse to get it
and/or have yet to find out the hard way. Hope you never do, but a
word to the wise is sufficient.
Oct 02, 2014 And another Obama Administration top official, little
Suzie Housefwife, head of the US Secret Service, bit the dust yesterday as
she resigned under pressure from the US Congress. What for?
Seems like she was busy collecting a big government paycheck for not doing
her job. Several cases of individuals jumping over the White House
fence on Pennsylvania Avenue -- right next to Marvin Gardens and B & O
Railroad -- and traipsing all over the White House before being apprehended
led Congress to call for the head of the Secret Service. Her tap dance
before Congress was a joke as she simply folded under questioning and had no
good answers about the security breaches that occurred under her watch.
What a surprise. This is just another indication of how big government
becomes so big and becomes so "politically correct" that it no longer can
even function. The US Post Office, Amtrak, the Secret Service, the
IRS, the EPA, the NSA, Eric Holder's DOJ, our Commander-in-Chief Barack
Obama with no military experience, bankrupt/lying VA hospitals with fake
lists, ObamaCare national socialist health, and on and on it goes. Big
Government that Democrats think is necessary to save and protect everybody
has morphed into the exact opposite: total bureaucratic incompetence
that hurts everybody. That's what happens when free market activities
are taken over by a central fascist state pretending that the government can
function as efficiently as the free market. Not to mention the loss of
every individual's inherent rights and freedoms.
Sep 29, 2014 Why is Eric Holder, America's top cop at the Dept of Justice,
resigning after 6 years with President Barack Obama? Easy peasy, lemon
squeazy. Holder is on the verge of getting caught for all of his dirty
deeds -- make that non-deeds of doing nothing -- in a dozen big time
scandals. Refusing to go after the IRS when it is clear beyond a
shadow of a doubt that the IRS has been used by the the Obama Administration
to target opposing political groups for tax exempt status, "fast and
furious" gun running by the US to the Mexican drug cartels on the premise,
which backfired, that the US could then trace the cartels by tracing the
guns. Unfortunately, the drug cartels are not as stupid as Obama and
Holder and they simply filed off the serial numbers of the free weapons they
received from Holder and then murdered US border agents.
What did Holder do about the murdered American ambassador in Benghazi in
which then Sec of State Hillarious Clinton and Dictator Obama thought they
could run guns in Libya and then when that failed tried to buy them back,
which also failed, and is why the US Ambassador was killed? Holder did
nothing. And it goes on and on with Obama and Holder playing the race
card at every opportunity, especially when they ran up against one of their
criminal brick walls and had nowhere else to go. So it is no big
surprise that after DOJ US Attorney Eric Holder was sanctioned by the US
Congress, he had to jump ship and try to get out of being prosecuted for all
his lies of commission and omission. His favorite response to
committees in Congress was, "Uh, I don't really know... Yeah, uh-huh,
I don't remember... Hmm, let me think, no, I don't really know the answer to
that question, I'll have to look it up after I eat my Cheerios and wipe my
derriere, whatever." Meanwhile, President Obama simply shakes Holder's
hand, smirks a sly grin, and says, "We'll miss you." You bet he will.
Now Obama's next trick is how to pick an Eric Holder clone for the DOJ top
cop position and convince the Senate to OK it. No problem.
Everybody on the Hill is making a deal just to stay in power in Washington
DC. Oh, and about the Middle East war that Obama supposedly ended and,
well oops, is now re-starting up to fight ISIL, ISIS, the Taliban, Hamas, Al
Qaeda -- hey I can't keep up with all the different camel tribe names in the
Middle East desert? Tune in next month for how Obama gets around
putting American "boots on the ground" by issuing all troopers Air Nikes
that somehow float 2 inches off the ground. Yeah, just change the
words so the deeds can follow. Our F-16s have been redefined as
"flying magic carpets." Bombs are now "popcorn."
Sep 21, 2014 So Scotland voted "no" to secede from the United Kingdom
last week. Why in hell would they want to secede? Some lame
answers that rolled in over the national news is that many Scots wanted more
socialism, more welfare money from their national governments and from Big
Brother England. Really? Are the Scots reallly that stupid?
Haven't they heard the news: Marxism died last century.
Capitalism has far outstripped anything socialism and communism could
produce in any economy. If you aren't able to intellectually
understand why all the Marxist economic sophisms were ridiculous and would
fail, then you should be able to turn on the TV news and synthesize the
empirical data from the last 200 years proving that socialism, fascism, and
communism -- all various forms of dictatorial state collectivism -- have
failed, and failed miserably with all kinds of accompanying Holocausts in
which millions of people were murdered by the omnipotent state. So why would
a Western Civilization like Scotland try to vote in more socialism?
Maybe because they don't understand that one can't get much more socialist
than Britain already is, nor can they figure out that it IS the socialism in
Britain -- certainly not free market capitalism -- that has brought both
Scotland and Not So Great Britain to the brink of social political and
economic bankruptcy. Dying of cyanide, the Scots were asking for more.
Anybody who thinks Britain -- or any other European nation, including
Switzerland -- is a free market needs their head examined. Hell, the
US is not even truly a free market. The most that one can claim about
America's market is that, technically, it is a fascist dictatorship with so
many government regulations that the Middle Class is essentially being wiped
out. In fact, at our current rate of decline, the US will soon pass up
European socialism, and degenerate into nothing but Washington Rules and
Welfare Recipients. Instead of voting to secede from the UK, perhaps
young Scots should be thinking about how the UK should secede from state
collectivism. Of course, that would entail something like thinking, or
reading Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.
Sep 21, 2014 So where is the United States on the ISIS crisis in the
Middle East? Without declaring an act of war, the US Congress has
voted to give our 1960's radical dictator, President Obama, several hundred
million dollars or more in funding to send US military troops to the Middle
East as "advisors," -- shades of a Vietnam instant replay. Obama's war
cry of "no boots on the ground," -- which means that US troops will be
wearing, what, Air Nike tennis shoes? -- is a joke. If you are going
to fight a war, then fight a war to win, not for publicity stunts and photo
ops. This is exactly what happened in Vietnam: America was
morally correct to help the South Vietnamese in their defense against a
coalition of the Communist North Vietnamese, the USSR, and Communist China
but American politicians nailed the US military's boots to the floor and did
not allow them to fight a real military war, which would have ended in about
48 hours with very few casualties. Instead, we "partnered" -- ha ha
"partnered" -- with the South Vietnamese farmers qua pretend-military
soldiers -- and lost our butts. Don't shoot unless you are fired upon,
now let's go do "search and destroy," etc. etc. and 500,000 US troops were
simply emasculated into sitting ducks while the Soviets and Chi Coms
rampaged through the South Vietnamese countryside committing the same types
of atrocities that ISIS is now committing in the MIddle East. A modern
US Army does not "partner" with rice farmers and camel drivers and expect
them to accomplish much of anything militarily. Think about it:
rice farmers and camel drivers earn like five bucks a year and if you offer
them a hundred bucks a month they will pretend to do anything you want just
to keep their families alive. This is exactly what happened when the
US exited Iraq stage left, as in left Liberal, and ISIS ran down through
Iraq. The "partnered" camel driver army of Iraq threw down their
American weapons faster than a New York Minute and ran for what few hills
there were. "Partnering" doesn't work. Foreign aid only enriches
the current leaders, with much of the funding ending up in ISIS's hands to
further finance the war against the US "infidels." So, the upshot
about how Dictator Obama is going to pretend that he is fighting a war in
the Middle East is a military joke, both strategically and tactically.
The US has a moral right to help the poor camel drivers and others whose
inherent individual rights are being stomped on in the Middle East --
especially women -- but Obama is not a military man, not even a very
intelligent neighborhood organizer, and should not be our automatic
Commander-in-Chief. One last note: it is becoming rather obvious
that either Obama is gung-ho PRO the ISIS Muslim Brotherhood because he
sympathizes with what he erroneously thinks is their previous
neo-colonization by western nations, or else he is even more stupid than we
previously thought. Conclusion: if one is going to fight a war,
one must commit to fighting it correctly. That is, with a minimum of
loss of life and with a clear objective of what one is doing and how one
should accomplish those objectives. It is morally correct to come to
the aid of an old lady being attacked on the streets by hoods using guns,
but not by showing up with a butter knife and partnering with Estonia for $2
billion. Nor should one show up with RPGs, Harrier jets, and a zillion
rounds of ammo for the "partners" to give away to the ISIS hoods. No
boots on the ground? Hey, lets' break out our Air Nikes and tiptoe
around the desert, pretending we're going to stop a Caliphate.
Meanwhile, who's coming across our southern borders with nuke suitcase bombs
and such? I wonder.
Sep 12, 2014 Part III of Ayn Rand's movie
Atlas Shrugged, Who is John Galt? comes out today. Go see
it and find out how today's economy ends and a renaissance begins. By
the way, where is Ragnar Daneskjold?
Sep 07, 2014 Whoa, Idahonians, wanna know why public education costs
so much in Idaho? Pull up the barn floor, pour yourself another hot
cup of Rocket Java and listen up, girl friends. Outgoing Supt of Idaho
Schools, Tom Luna, gave two top staffers raises amounting to about 50% and
37% respectively. The salary for Deputy Chief of Staff, Jason Hancock,
was bumped from $88,000 per year to $130,000 per year and Communications
Director, Melissa McGrath's salary was boosted from $72,000 per year to
$98,000 per year. Why? Luna only said, "because they took on
extra work." Most of the other 140 employees on Luna's staff received
a 1% salary and 1% bonus increase this year. Compare this to private
businesses: Nobody in a commensurate salary job would receive a 50% or
37% pay raise unless they invented the wheel or discovered how to time
travel. Idaho's Public Education system is riddled with these types of
cronyisms and ridiculous expenditures. The Pub Ed annual budget is
about $2.0 billion per year out of Idaho's $3 billion budget. Adding
in federal grants and other cookies from the fed for Leave No Child Behind,
Race To The Top, and now Common Core, bring Idaho's annual budget to around
$3 billion per year. When running for Dist 18's Senate seat in 2004 I
downloaded the entire Idaho State School Budget and discovered hundreds of
redundant line items for busing, landscaping, special programs, Vice
Principles not per high school but per each of 3-4 grades per high school,
and on and on. Many Idaho school district's cost per pupil for K-12
education totaled -- wait for it -- totaled more than the then $35,000 per
year cost to attend Harvard University. Elementary schools with 50 or
less kids had to duplicate everything that schools with hundreds of children
had, from playgrounds to buses to cafeterias to gymnasium and so on.
If Idaho was really a Conservative state, Gov Otter and School Supt Tom Luna
would have worked to dump public schools and moved education to privately
owned schools. Otherwise, these above mentioned pay raises for friends
of friends, buddies of buddies, will continue until they finally bankrupt
Idaho's Pub Ed System. Meanwhile, the kids are coming out dumber and
dumber and do not even learn HOW to think much less what to think.
Sep 05, 2014 Dinesh D'Souza's latest book:
America, Where Would the World be Without Her is a must read for
anybody who is trying to keep up with current social political economics.
He explains why President Obama and the current crop of progressives are not
stupid but are actually very clever at what they are doing, which is
purposefully trying to downsize the United States for what they consider is
just dues for America's alleged past colonialism. The progressives
are, of course, wrong and D'Souza points out how in his very
thought-provoking book plus a movie of the same title. Think of
D'Souza's book as Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Lite,
not on intellectualism but on the style of writing. Both books are
great reads and both movies are, too.
Sep 05, 2014 Next Friday on Sep 12 Ayn Rand's Part III, the
conclusion, to her trilogy film Atlas Shrugged will be playing at all major
theatres. I suggest you re-see Parts I and II so you can slide right
into Part III with your buttery bag of popcorn. Popcorn once a month
or so is OK, for all you philosopher body builders out there trying to keep
up with Ragnar Daneskjold, the pirate in Atlas Shrugged who keeps all
government busy by blowing up or swiping all of their stolen cargo on the
high seas and getting away in his super fast Ragnar-mo-ship traveling at the
speed of sound. Remember where we left off in Part II? Dagny had
just tried to follow a Jr scientist who figured out how to make John Galt's
energy machine work but crashed her plane at Galt's Gulch. Many
scientists, businessmen, and musicians have already vanished to Galt's Gulch
from the regular altruistic state collectivist world and now Dagny will have
to figure out why she is guilty for continuing to be a producer, a producer
that keeps the state collectivists governments in power to continue their
looting and destruction of the world. When will she finally figure it
out? Tune in next week on Aug 12 at your local cinema and find out.
Aug 26, 2014 Here's a good task for an investigative journalist out there in
reader land to perform: contact all of President Barack Obama's professors
at Columbia University and ask them if they have copies of the grades they
gave to each of their students, mainly to Obama. Since one cannot
obtain those transcripts from the staff at Columbia -- they are, for some
God only knows reason, sealed -- the only avenue of investigation left is to
go directly to Barack's professors. I'm betting that there is not one
professor who can even remember having Barack Obama in ANY of his/her
classes at Columbia, much less can they present a copy of any grade they
gave to him for attending/completing any class. This is exactly what
Wayne Allyn Root, author of The Murder of The Middle Class, discovered when
he attended a recent Columbia class reunion. Wayne Allyn Root was
Barack Obama's classmate -- if Obama even attended -- at Columbia and he
could not find one student or one professor who claims to have seen Barack
Obama anywhere at Columbia University. So here's what I'm guessing
really happened: The powers that be enrolled Barack Obama at Columbia
University in a clandestine manner for the future purpose of then getting
him into Harvard Law School. Obama never really attended any classes
at Columbia -- which is why nobody ever saw him there and why professors
have claimed he was never in their class -- and then the powers that be,
along with the staff at Columbia who was in on this great hoax, "graduated"
Barack Obama so he could then enroll at Harvard Law School. Coming
from Occidental College in LA and transferring to Columbia was the Big Hoax
but the powers that be had to do it in order for Obama to then go on to
Harvard. All part of the Big Plan to elect the first black man as
President of the US. They knew that the guilt-ridden American youth
and a huge majority of blacks in America would overwhelmingly vote yes for
Obama, especially after they rigged his university pedigree that virtually
nobody in the major news media has questioned -- except Free Market Duck and
other Tea Party/Libertarians. So, the real Hercules Poirot moment, the
Sherlock Holmes discovery, is for somebody to ask each of Obama's professors
or TAs at Columbia if they can produce a copy of his grades from their
class(es). My guess is: Nope, because he never really "attended"
Columbia. Note that I did not ask whether the Columbia University
staff, the perps who were in on this Big Scam, could produce any grades for
his classes; I am asking each professor whether they can produce a copy of
the grade they gave to him for each of their class(es). If I am
correct, they will say NO -- or be afraid and say nothing, which is the same
as a non-yes, a NO. And that will be proof positive that President
Barack Obama did not "legitimately" attend Columbia University and also,
therefore, did not qualify for admittance into Harvard Law School. The
Obama University Hoax which dragged him into the presidency of the United
Sates will probably be revealed in the future as one of the greatest hoaxes
and true political conspiracies ever perpetrated upon this nation. Any
volunteers for this investigative journalism? Afraid of the
consequences? You should be.
Aug 22, 2014 Listen up girl friends, shut up and pour yourselves another hot
cup of Rocket Java. Let's get educated here. According to author Dinesh D'Souza in his book, Obama's America,
Unmaking the American Dream, here is a sample excerpt from
Michelle Obama's thesis regarding being black at Princeton:
"By actually working with the Black lower class or
within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separatist may
better understand the desparation [sic] of their situation and feel more
hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant
to their plight." As D'souza correctly states, "The grammar
is wrong; the tenses are garbled. People are ignorant 'of' the plight
of the lower class, not ignorant 'to' their plight. And 'desparation'
should be spelled 'desperation.'" As reviewer Christian Hitchens wrote
about Michelle's thesis, "These are not mere typos; they reflect an
estranged relationship with the English language. Moreover, they
appear not in an off-the-cuff transcript but in a thesis that is supposed to
reflect the culmination of one's college career." As Hitchens further
wrote, "To describe it [Michelle's thesis] as hard to read would be a
mistake; the thesis cannot be 'read' at all, in the strict sense of the
term. This is because it wasn't written in any known language."
This is the level of intellectualism that it takes to get a degree from
Princeton University. D'Souza added, "Remarkably Michelle graduated
with honors at Princeton and was admitted to Harvard Law School. And
subsequently Michelle was hired by the University of Chicago to run
'programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer
recruitment, staff diversity, and minority contracting,' with a salary of
$316,000 a year. Yeah, so pour yourself another hot cup of Rocket Java
and have a good laugh at what it takes to graduate with honors from
Princeton and Harvard. As a side note, President Obama also attended
Harvard where he was President of the Harvard Law Review. So how many
editorials and columns did Obama write for the Harvard Law Review, according
to D'Souza's research? A big fat ZERO! The upshot: one
could draw the opinion that both President Obama and the First Lady were
given special passes at several Ivy League universities (Columbia and
Harvard for Barack and Princeton and Harvard for Michelle) because they were
black. If this is true, then it is racism to the nth degree, practiced
by institutions of supposed higher learning.
Aug 22, 2014 Sec of Defense, Chuckie Cheese Hagel, just popped onto national
TV and exclaimed in a surprise voice that maybe the ISIS Islamo fanatics
weren't a Jr Varsity team like President Obama called them a coupla weeks
ago... and, he continued, we had better take these fellas quite seriously
and maybe start reading the Pentagon's G2 intelligence summaries that the
President and his administration receives every morning like clock work.
How do I know? Because I worked with the Assistant Chief of Staff,
Intelligence in the Pentagon and Saigon, Vietnam for two years and helped
prepare those reports for the then President and Chief of Staff.
Apparently Obama has been throwing these reports into the garbage every day
and playing 18 rounds of golf instead. These reports are top secret
crypto with half of them eyes only and if Obama was in the military being
considered for this intelligence position he would have failed just on
account of all of his past associates such as Bill Ayres, Rev Wright, the
Communist Party, socialist affiliations, etc. And now, this person who
could not even qualify for the lowest level "Confidential" security
clearance is the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.
What a horrible joke this is for America: a treasonous NAZI in charge
of our nation, becoming a dictator day by day by issuing simple-minded
Executive Orders that nobody in Congress or the Judicial Dept will squash as
totally illegal. How long Obama will get away with his obvious
dictatorial activities depends on the American sheeple. When will
they wake up and what are they going to do about it?
Aug 22, 2014 Hmm, girl friends, looks like Dictator Obama has broken at
least two laws in his release of Pvt Bergdahl in exchange for five Gitmo
terrorists: (1) Obama neglected to give the US Congress 30 days notice
of his intent to release Pvt Bergdahl, and (2) Obama neglected to obtain
authorization for the funding to perform this action. The Committee on
Whatsmacallit in Washington (who cares what their real name is) just
indicted the Obama Administration on both counts, which means the US
Congress will call a special Let's Impeach Obama Session over the Labor Day
Weekend and the entire US population will rise up and revolt. Yeah,
when hell freezes over.
Aug 19, 2014 Never mind the Democratic-created race riots in Ferguson, MO --
created by implementing our nation's welfare ghettoes -- let's
ask an important Commander-in-Chief question. What kind of
Commander-in-Chief allows a large portion of his military arsenal to be abandoned and captured
by the enemy in the Middle East during an American withdrawal? What kind of Commander-in-Chief
allows the fanatical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East to waltz into a
major Iraqi city and take over the bank accounts worth over a half a billion
dollars, re-routing the money to other banks so they can continue financing
the Muslim fanatics' war against innocent people? The answer: President Barack Obama. What's the problem? The problem is that the elected
president of the United States is automatically ensconced as America's
Commander-in-Chief. That's because America's first president, George
Washington, HAPPENED to be an officer in the American Revolutionary War and
thus assumed the position of Commander-in-Chief after the War, too.
Now we have the ridiculous anomaly of all subsequent presidents being
automatically appointed as Commanders-in-Chief, even though most of them
have never served in the military, especially as a higher-up officer with
tactical and strategic training or experience. That's how we get the
ridiculous spectacle of a president like Barack Obama, with no military
training or experience, coupled with his ideology of "fundamentally
transforming America" -- interpreted as fundamentally destroying America and
its fundamental principles -- becoming a Commander-in-Chief who has no clue
about how to conduct a foreign war. And so, since Obama was
brainwashed as a youth into fanatical Islam, we should not be surprised that
he (1) totally screws up as Commander-in-Chief in the Middle East, while
simultaneously (2) leans heavily toward the supporting of fanatical Muslims
fighting what he perceives to be America's colonial imperialism. The
facts are becoming rather obvious: Obama is doing everything possible
to destroy the United States, its fundamental documents, and America's
principles of individualism -- individual freedoms, individual property
rights, and free market capitalism. Funny -- but not really -- how the
ideology and goals of the fanatical Muslims in the Middle East are the very same
ideology and goals of the national socialists currently running the White
House in America.
Aug 18, 2014 Democrats created black ghettoes in all the major cities of
America by implementing welfare programs. Little pockets of socialism. No fathers, more welfare.
More children, more welfare. Nobody likes a condescending
Big Brother, passing out welfare, insinuating that the recipient has no self
respect and is nothing but a welfare slave to the state. So who
represents the state? The cops in the welfare ghetto. No wonder
blacks in the ghetto hate the cops. And it doesn't matter whether the
cops are black or white or pink or purple. It's a love-hate
relationship caused by the welfare state: gimme my freebies but I hate
you for it. [Note: this is true for foreign aid on the
international level, too.] This has been going on since
at least the 1960s. In walks President Barrack Obama in 2008 who is hell bent
on implementing more state collectivism, more state welfare to fundamentally change America.
Why? We don't really care at this point since we have already
discussed Obama's fallacious economic sophisms for creating socialism ad
nauseum. Suffice it to say that Obama's intelligence level has never gotten
past the bankrupt level of classical Marxist socialism. The point is, the Obama administration knows how to write
Hollywood scripts to take advantage of welfare-created racial issues in any city
in America. So last week, 18-year-old black punk Michael Brown and a gangsta buddy (Dorian Johnson) rob a
local store in Ferguson, Missouri, steal $47 worth of cigarillos,
rough up the store owner on the way out and then both youths proceed to wander down the
middle of Main Street, holding up traffic and hurling insults to police
officers who try to get the youths out of the middle of the road and to use the
sidewalk. One version of the story at this point is that the cop who hustled
-- or tried to hustle -- Michael Brown and accomplice into a cop
car because the two wannabe gangsta youths refused to stop traipsing down
Main Street blocking traffic did not know -- or may have known -- that the two youths had just
robbed a convenience store. The youths, however, thought the cop was
arresting them for robbing the store and therefore started fighting with
the cop in the cop car. From various reports, Michael Brown punched
the cop, grabbed his gun, and fired off a round, missing everybody, and then
dashed out of the cop car. According to witnesses who took a video
tape of this proceeding, Michael Brown suddenly turned around and ran back
toward the pursuing cop like a mad bull. The cop and several other
cops then shot at Michael Brown when he refused to stop charging after they
yelled, "Freeze!" It took six shots to bring down Michael Brown by at
least one white cop. Downtown Brown, the looter, died on Main Street that
day. All of a sudden, the black Obama administration and the standard
black shake-down artists, Al Sharpton et associates, scream the magic
welfare ghetto word, "Racism!" and all hell breaks lose. Ghetto blacks
turn into street judges, jury, and executioners as hundreds of mostly black
youths break into stores and ransack Main Street. Like
stealing flat screen TVs and clothing is justified because the cops shot a
black robber whose actions were caught and broadcasted all over America on
national TV. The Democratic Gov of Missouri calls out the National
Guard to quell the riot and President Obama takes a golfing break from his
vacation at Martha's Vineyard to show up on national TV and pretend like he
is shocked by what he has continued to help set up as America's welfare
ghettoes. Imagine this, Obama can't bring himself to send National
Guard troops to the southern border to stop hundreds of thousands of illegal
immigrants and terrorists from running across the border to the US but it's OK for the
National Guard to show up to Ferguson, MO. Why? Because the
bigger the created "racial" crisis gets in America, the more excuse Obama
has of invoking martial law and thus curtailing the 2014 or even the 2016
national elections. Like this hasn't already been planned out by the
Obama administration. Remember Obama's war cry, "Never let a good
crisis go to waste," and this crisis is just one of the many crises that
President Obama is implementing to "fundamentally transform America."
Mark my words, President Obama's pretended concern for the race riots in
Ferguson is just that: gross pretension.
Aug 17, 2014 Recently published books you should read: (1)
The Murder of the Middle Class by Wayne
Allyn Root, how to save yourself and your family from the criminal
conspiracy of the century. What can you do? The first step is to
recognize who is responsible. The Murder of
the Middle Class exposes the crime and indicts conspirators, from
the Obama administration to their willing accomplices in big business, big
media, and big unions -- naming names and pointing out their misdeeds.
But Wayne Allyn Root doesn't just prove the crime and profile the suspects,
he provides bold solutions to save American capitalism, the middle class,
the GOP and YOU! This middle class warrior gives you the game plan and
the weapons to fight back. Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian
vice presidential nominee, political commentator, international speaker,
CEO, serial entrepreneur, branding expert, and champion of small business
and the middle class. He appears on hundreds of radio and TV shows
annually -- including FOX News -- and serves as executive vice chairman of
the Conservative Caucus. The second must-read book is: (2)
Obama's America, Unmaking the American
Dream by Dinesh D'Souza. This is D'Souza's sequel to his hit movie
2016: Obama's America. Can
America survive four more years of Barack Obama? No, says D'Souza,
because America as we know it -- wealthy, powerful, assertive -- is not what
Obama wants. He wants a smaller America, a poorer America, and America
unable to assert its will, and America happy to be one power among many, an
America in decline so that other nations might rise -- all in the name of
global fairness. To Obama, the hated "one percent" isn't just wealthy
Americans; it is America itself. In Obama's view, America needs to be
taken down a notch. [Note: actually, as Ayn Rand would have
said, it is the fundamental moral philosophy of America, the ideas of
individualism: individual rights, individual freedoms, and individual
responsibility that Obama wants to destroy, and replace the fundamental
principles that America was founded upon with Obama's fundamental ideas of
state collectivism better known as classic Marxist socialism.] A third
book, also written by Dinesh D'Souza that you should read is: (3)
America: Imagine the World Without Her.
This book goes along with D'Souza's latest movie of the same name. A
synopsis from Wikipedia states, "Setting the stage for a presentation of
their views, D'Souza and producer Sullivan provide counterfactual histories
in which George Washington is killed during the Revolutionary War, or the
country is divided following civil war, creating a world without America
that would be vastly worse off. He claims modern leftists are 'telling a new
story' however, contradicting traditional veneration for America in order to
'convince a nation to author its own destruction' and 'unmake the America
that is here now.' He then challenges several 'indictments' made against the
country and American Exceptionalism, including sociology professor and
activist Michael Eric Dyson's claim that 'Thievery' was the 'critical
element' for 'American empire' and historian and activist Ward Churchill's
assertion that the US is the world's new evil empire." D'Souza says,
"... 1960s Chicago radical Saul Alinski, historian Howard Zinn, and others
have promoted guilt and resentment regarding wealth inequality that has
helped shape the political careers of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
"D'Souza argues that
America's wealth has been created, not stolen. He says the $700 used to
purchase colonial Manhattan from American Indians could buy many desolate
parcels globally today, but that individual industry has made New York real
estate worth billions. He states that in Europe, India, and elsewhere most
countries have been founded on conquest, and observes that the American
pattern of wealth creation hasn't been the universal norm. He cites examples
like Arab historian Ibn Khaldun preferring looting to trade and says that
merchants form Hinduism’s second-lowest social caste.
"The film argues that
American Indians exhibited this "conquest ethic' among themselves, and that
most of what American Indian depopulation occurred during European
colonization resulted from the accidental transmission of plagues that had
earlier devastated Europe, not an intent to wipe out a people. It says
modern American Indians have little interest in returning to their
hunter-gatherer past. In an interview Senator Ted Cruz compares the Texas
Revolution to the American Revolution. Professor and Reconquista advocate
Charles Truxillo is contrasted with an interviewed American of Mexican
descent who says he has no desire to return to a poverty and crime ridden
Mexico and instead wants to live the 'American Dream'.
"D'Souza says that slavery
impeded American development, rather than boosting it. The film argues that
slavery was an omnipresent phenomenon for most of human history, but that
its abolition was 'uniquely Western', noting the rarity of a 'great war
fought to end slavery' like the American Civil War. According to the film,
the Declaration of Independence essentially says 'liberty is the solution to
injustice,' a 'promissory note' cashed throughout history by Americans such
as Martin Luther King, Jr. C.J. Walker, the black entrepreneur and
daughter of slaves who is regarded as America's first self made female
millionaire, is cited as an example of the type of individual success story
the American system allows that is ignored by historians like Zinn because
it undermines their leftist narrative. Columbia University economist Jagdish
Bhagwati is shown saying that the 'world is embracing the free market,' for
which there is 'no reason for us to be apologetic.' The film outlines how
free enterprise, consumer choice rather than coercion, has raised living
standards by making existing goods cheaper and creating new ones.
"The film challenges the
notion that America is a rapacious conqueror by arguing that Americans have
sacrificed for human well being around the world, including places like
Afghanistan, Iraq, Germany, and Japan, seeking in return only 'enough ground
to bury' their dead, as former Secretary of State Colin Powell is quoted as
saying. A US veteran of Hanoi Hilton captivity is interviewed discussing his
desire to liberate Vietnam. D'Souza reflects on Lincoln's assassination and
the continuing cost of freedom, saying that we no longer have past heroes
like Washington and Lincoln, but 'we do have us' in 'our struggle for the
restoration of America.'” Both the book and the movie are must-read
and must-see for anybody who wants a more objective review of what America
is and should continue to be into the future, vs. the national socialist direction that Obama is currently pushing
Aug 11, 2014 Whoa, girl friends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, listen up,
and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. I got an important
question: what if there is no Allah? I mean, that is the
fundamental question in today's terrorist Jihad, isn't it? If there is no
Allah, then it begs all the other subsequent questions such as, why the hell
are the Muslims trying to exterminate the Christians and Jews? Or, who
said that if you, as a Muslim, die while taking out a bunch of "Infidels"
riding on a bus to work, then you will go to Heaven and hook up with 72
virgins? What proof do we have that Allah even exists? Much less
the virgins? Does
anybody have a photograph of Allah? How about a CD, DVR, tape
recording, or any other sound or video device of Allah espousing anything?
Or even tap dancing on a camel's back? So, if nobody in the Caliphate
in the Middle East can produce logical proof that Allah exists, why are
thousands of Muslim barbarians running all over Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Iran,
and even Europe, Africa, and the US shouting crap that Allah told us to do
this, Allah told us to do that, etc.? If you have some proof that
Allah exists, just post it on Face Book or Youtube and let the whole world
in on your little secret because, I for one, would like to see some proof
that Allah exists and that Allah told Muslims like ISIS, the Taliban, Al
Qaeda, Al Dummy et al to run all over the desert and shoot everything that
moves. Looks like most wars throughout history have been fought on
Fairytale premises just like this. The war in the Middle East is simply another
The truth is that a group of intellectually emasculated Muslim barbarians
have simply conjured up a glob of ridiculous fairytales to justify their
barbaric behavior. Christians, Jews, and adherents of all other Earth
religions, you might want to question some of the premises of your moral
philosophy, too. As a footnote, those who are mindlessly following
every utterance of Billy Meier and the human ET Plejaren might want to
rethink some of the translations regarding basic social-political-economics.
And if you think the English language does not provide enough clarity as
high German then you can always read this praxeological information in high
German since it was an Austrian economist, Ludwig von Mises, who wrote the
original 1,000 page dissertation of free market economics in German. Those of you
who in the Billy Meier-Plejaren school of thought think English is just as
developed as high German can read it in English. Are you listening,
translators of the Plejaren contact notes, those of you who have fallen for
the false baloney that the English language does not lend itself to the
nuances and supposed complexities of the German language? Not
referring to the Henoch embedded vibrational codes, of course. That's
another story. Billy Meier followers should rethink
their premises and think for themselves instead of blindly following what could
include many economics and political sophisms being put forth by those who
have been so long removed from Earth's level of evolution that they no
longer can conceive of the intellectual evolutionary stage that we must go
through to reach that of the Plejaren's. I suspect the main problem is
an error in translation in that those doing the translations from
Plejaranese to English are filtering their translations through left liberal
rose-colored glasses. Those who do not know what I am talking about
can log onto www.figu.org and choose
English to read all about it. Still, back to the scene of the crime, there is no Allah and
the ISIS terrorists have no logical reason to be
performing their barbarous acts anywhere in the world -- same for everybody
else in every other nation, too.
Aug 08, 2014 Now that the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, and Al
Qaeda have nearly taken over all of Iraq using American weapons given to
them by our "fast and furious" idiot President, our Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama, he dashed onto national TV today to "save a group of cornered
Iraqi civilians" by ordering American war planes to bomb ISIS. That's
after telling our Middle Eastern enemies everything tactical and strategic
about the mission. Such as, he will not put any boots on the ground,
he will be sending F-16 fighter planes, and the US will be dropping food and
water to the cornered civilians at 3 pm Eastern Standard Time. Why not tell ISIS the names and
addresses of the F-16 bomber pilots so the Jihadists in America can target
the US pilots' American wives and families? President Obama is NOT an
executive; he is NOT a Commander-in-Chief. He is strictly a marketeer,
a salesman selling his tired old left liberal politics written by Hollywood
script writers to all the young university students across America. He
is the mouth piece for branding the Democratic Party. That is all he
knows how to do. So, what does he do when it's time to go to battle?
He either plays golf or goes onto national TV and reads the US's battle plan
ver batim off a teleprompter as if he was selling
the Democratic Party for re-election in 2014. Yes indeed. I am
sending in fighter bombers, vote for me. They will be flying from the
West and North and carrying surface to ground missiles, showing up, oh, how
about 2 or 3 pm, if that's OK with you guys in the Muslim Brotherhood?
And if elected, I promise you can keep your doctor, you can keep your
current medical plan, and the IRS is not targeting the Tea Party, "not even
a smidgeon," deserter Bergdahl is a war hero because I cleverly traded him
for releasing five -- count 'em, one, two, three, four, five -- Muslim
Brotherhood bad guys from Gitmo so they could get back into the Middle East
war. Maybe we'll see them in New York. Who knows? If our
battle plans change, I will be sure to show up on national TV and radio and
telegraph all our top secret moves to the Taliban and ISIS...because... I'm
the Commander-in-Chief, my ratings are down, and we need to beat the
Republicans in 2014 and 2016. Hallelujah and God bless America... and
Mohammed... OK, God bless Buddha, too.
Aug 07, 2014 Here's an interesting question: what type of moral philosophy takes
hundreds of millions of dollars donated as foreign aid to rebuild schools,
hospitals, and churches and instead uses that money to build 40
concrete tunnels from one city to a neighboring city in order to kidnap
and murder the target city's inhabitants? What type of moral
philosophy creates a fictitious omniscient that its adherents claim instructs
them to wipe out an entire neighboring culture? We're talking about a
fanatical sect of Islam and its adherents called Hamas in the Middle East.
And you can add the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda to
that list of crazies, too. The target culture that Hamas et al. is
trying to eradicate is Israel. Hamas took over the political scene in
the Palestinian Gaza Strip and is pretending that an omniscient has told
them to exterminate all Jews in the world. What kind of moral
philosophy is that? On a universal scale, what type of evolutional
intelligence does it take to make this type of claim? All Palestinians
are not members of Hamas. But one of the problems in the Middle East
is that those Palestinians, those Islamists, who claim that they do not
believe in the same genocidal tenets as Hamas, are doing nothing to curtail
Hamas' Jihad against Israel and the United States. Not doing anything
and keeping one's Islamic mouth shut makes the Do-Nothings just as guilty as
the crazies in Hamas.
Silence is the same as going along with the program. This condition of
condoning the war in the Middle East by doing nothing against those who have
hijacked one's religion would be tantamount to the major Christian religions
in the US standing by and allowing a fanatical group like the KKK to enact a
program of genocide against whichever ethnic group the KKK thinks God told
them to eradicate. The illogic of the Islamist fanatics is
contradictory and ridiculous at face value: First Hamas, ISIS, and the
Muslim Brotherhood create an omniscient and then they imbue said omniscient
with stupid human activities in order to do what an omniscient -- by
definition of being all powerful -- doesn't need humans to do for said
omniscient. Why would an omniscient who
is all powerful need boob-heads on planet Earth to do what he or she could
do all by him/herself? In fact, why would an all powerful omniscient
create a group of people on planet Earth and then ask another group of
people to eradicate the former? It is illogical to create the idea of an omniscient and then attribute human attributes
to said omniscient. That's called anthropomorphism, not to mention
contradictory. If I was a
human ET flying by planet Earth in my beam ship and saw what was going on
between the major earth religions (moral philosophies), I would probably
just shake my head and say, "Pass!"
July 26, 2014 Listen up, girl friends. Pull up the barn floor
and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. President Obama
has now started a civil war in the United States. After Congress voted
"No" three times against Obama's so-called Dream Act, which was nothing but
amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants who have run across our
southern border into the US, Obama then orchestrated a huge influx -- tens
of thousands per month -- of illegal immigrant youths from Central America
to storm across the Mexican-US border and demand citizenship. Over
50,000 youths paying thousands of dollars each to drug cartels to ship them
to the US border via Mexico have flooded our borders. This was planned
last year by the Obama Administration as they sent out an RFQ (Request For
Quote) by the DHS (Dept of Homeland Security) asking for vendors who could
supply transportation, shelter, etc. for an expected 65,000 plus immigrants
who would be streaming across the border this summer. I.e., the Obama
Administration ORCHESTRATED, that is pre-planned, this entire mess in which
children are being trafficked by drug cartels into sex slavery, drug gangs,
and bringing in "Uncle Jose" druggies as "relatives" of these poor hapless
children. Jihadist terrorists are also among those flooding the border
and they will no doubt pop up later with bombs to help destroy the US.
The Obama Administration has sent thousands of children to all states in the
US in an effort to -- as his administration describes it -- redistribute the
ethnic makeup of what our imperial President thinks are suburbs that are
"too white." These are the suburban whites that Obama claims should
not have fled inner city ghettoes, ghettoes which look like war zones and
are a direct result of America's federal and state welfare programs.
And now that Texas Gov Rick Perry has sent 1,000 National Guard soldiers to
stop this Obama-created fiasco at the Texas border, President Obama just met
yesterday with the Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador to
discuss the possibility of his (Obama's) issuing another illegal Executive
Order to ostensibly pre-qualify those nations' illegal immigrants in their
native countries so they
will already have "legal papers" and thus be able to just fly into the US
without having to first go to Mexico and then running across the border.
This is tantamount to President Obama declaring a civil war against the
American taxpayer. Without using guns or militia, Obama and his
socialist czars in the Oval Office are simply issuing new Executive Orders,
twisting the law, to invade America. This is no different than a
foreign nation sending hundreds of thousands of "welfare soldiers" to the US
to purposely overwhelm our already over-burdened welfare system and thus
financially bankrupt the US. There are two ways to destroy a nation:
guns and bullets or financial bankruptcy. President Obama is making
use of both methods at two different levels: (1) his latest border
fiasco to bankrupt the civil services of America, and (2), the international
level, supplying military arms and foreign aid to our enemies in the Middle
East. If one were to sit down in a War Room and try to figure out how
to attack, invade, and destroy America, one could not have come up
with a better plan than what President Obama is currently inflicting upon
the United States. From implementing ObamaCare to using the IRS to
target Americans to all the other illegal imperial orders he is issuing,
President Obama has now totally emasculated the US Congress and pulled the
Judicial Dept -- run by his buddy US AG Eric Holder -- into his Executive
Dept. There are no longer three branches of government. There is
only one: Dictator Obama and his Imperial Executive Dictatorship,
running an 18th Century Marxist Playbook. Look around you: Pied
Piper Obama has implemented Marxist state collectivism against the American
people, against our Founding Fathers' moral philosophical principles of
individual rights and responsibilities embedded in the US Constitution.
On the international level, Obama has created the groundwork for WW III as
he supports the Middle East Caliphate bombing the crap out of Israel and
many Middle Eastern nations. This was all easily predicted back in
2008 as soon we saw who Obama hung out with and how he was educated.
Then again, what does all of this say about the voters who voted for Barack
Obama? And the so-called intellectuals who are running our educational
institutions? Who is John Galt? Better yet, where is Ragnar
July 22, 2014 News Flash!! Court ruling
means Idaho could have avoided ObamaCare mandates, taxes.
According to a recent report from Wayne Hoffman's Idaho Freedom Foundation,
"A federal appeals court ruling means Idaho needlessly exposed its residents
and businesses to Obamacare's employer and individual mandates by creating a
state insurance exchange," Idaho Freedom Foundation President Wayne Hoffman
said today. "The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled
that the Internal Revenue Service erred when it wrote rules allowing
insurance subsidies in states that have not set up a state insurance
exchange. Under the plain wording of the Obamacare statute,
individuals and businesses are subject to Obamacare penalties in states
where tax subsidies are available, but those subsidies are only available in
states that choose a state insurance exchange. In other words,
states that do not set up a state exchange shield
their residents and businesses from possible Obamacare penalties;
states that do develop an insurance exchange, as Idaho did, can use the
subsides, but they're also exposed to penalties. Idaho
Freedom Foundation and the Cato Institute provided these details to state
lawmakers and Governor Otter on multiple occasions, but they chose to
establish a state exchange anyway. This ruling validates our position
that the state not only didn't need to establish an insurance exchange but
that also that Idaho's exchange has become the vehicle for enforcing
Obamacare's penalty provisions," said Hoffman, who was a member of the
Governor's 2012 taskforce studying the possibly of creating an insurance
exchange. "We encourage lawmakers and the governor to keep monitoring this
issue and consider action necessary to protect the state, its residents and
businesses from Obamacare's taxes and penalties. If the ruling stands, it
means repealing the state exchange. The ruling likely faces additional
appeals and the case could ultimately land in the U.S. Supreme Court."
[Note: As Freemarketduck has stated over and
over that Idaho's setting up of an Obamacare socialist state health care
exchange would mean that we would then be subject to all the enforcement
rules of Obamacare and leave us with no legal recourse to refute those
rules, we have now seen exactly what this means, from this recent US Court
of Appeals. Thanks a lot Gov Otter for, once again, erroneously
interpreting what happens when you join forces with the federal government,
accept their statist premises, and try to appease and compromise with state
collectivist ideologies. Obama and his thugs in Washington DC needed
the sanction of their victims, and that is exactly what you, Gov Otter,
provided to them when you voluntarily forced Idaho into Obamacare.]
July 20, 2014 Hot diggity dog! Russia has now shot down a
commercial airliner flying 33,000 feet over the Ukraine, killing several
hundred passengers and crew aboard. President Obama and his
cigar-smoking commie czars in the White House must be sitting around
laughing their little butts off about their good fortune. Now all the
major news media have dashed over to yesterday's airliner blowup and stopped
reporting on Obama's illegal trafficking of thousands of Hispanic children
into America to destroy our suburbs. Hooray! Saved by a Putin
plane crash. Last week it was the trafficking of thousands of illegal
immigrant children from Central America that saved -- saved?? -- Obama from
his IRS Director and Lois "blank stare" Lerner's "missing emails" on all her
and other IRS officials' supposedly "crashed hard drives" -- which everybody
knows is NOT where emails are stored -- that reveal how the Obama
Administration was purposely targeting Conservative political groups in
denying them 501 c 4 exemption status. And the week before that, the
same IRS debacle saved Obama from the Bergdahl-5 bad Jihadists from Gitmo
debacle. And the week before the Bergdahl trade for 5 bad Jihadists
from Gitmo, it was... never mind... it just goes on and on and on.
This president is working overtime to create as many national crises as
possible in order to stymie Congress and the American people. Nobody
seems to know what to do. The Founding Fathers set up 3 branches of
government as a check and balance on each other but nobody thought of
setting up a government solution that could take care of a President and DOJ
who are conspiring to take down the government and crash it into total civil
war. The President totally ignores Congress's laws and simply issues
his own Executive Orders that countermand the nation's laws with a US
Attorney General who refuses to do anything about it. Congress says
they can defund Obama's programs but guess what? The private Federal
Reserve can print up as much credit and fake paper as they want and fork it
over to President Obama in all sorts of ways, openly and clandestine.
The CIA receives money not in the US budget. Obama has already used
budgets in all the major bureaus in the nation, FDA, EPA, etc. to buy up as
much ammunition for firearms that he can get away with in order to create a
severe shortage of ammunition for American citizens who refuse to give up
their guns. Obama has signed into law his ability to declare martial
law and if he can do that, then he and his national thugs can take over the
US Treasury and create as much real or phony money as they want. Plus
ration all goods and services. The only question left today is: what
crisis is the Obama Administration planning right now during this temporary
news break focusing on the shooting down of a commercial airliner by the
Russians in the Ukraine? Maybe Abduhl qua Jose running across our
southern border is hooking up the wires in his suitcase nuke while sitting
in his room at one of our major city's whoop-tee-doo hotels? Nobody
checks suitcases in hotels. Maybe there are 10 Abduhls performing this
same function all across America? Kaboom! Whaddaya know?
Time for Obama's martial law and rations and NO ELECTIONS. How
clever... Welcome to the Pied Piper's Saul Alinksy invasion and
takeover of the United States... looky looky at my left hand while I
stab you in the back with my right hand... and then blame it all on the Tea
July 16, 2014 The method to Obama's Border Madness is that he is
purposely flooding the US southern border with
illegal immigrant children from Honduras,
Guatemala, El Salvador, and Mexico in order to redistribute what he calls
the unfair demographics of ethnicity in America's suburbs. In other
words, Obama's racist czars are not only using former President George Bush's absurd law
that allows illegal immigrants under 18 years of age from non-contiguous countries in
South America to NOT be deported, he is also conspiring -- that's right,
CONSPIRING -- with HUD's (Housing and Urban Development) bureau called
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) to bus, fly, or transport by
whatever means possible, thousands
of illegal immigrants from our southern borders to middle and northern
American cities. Specifically, the feds are sending illegal immigrants
to suburbs of predominantly white ethnic
communities -- without informing the Governors or anybody else in those
states and communities. In short, because all kinds of people --
black, white, Hispanic, Asian, and probably Martians in green suits -- fled
most all of America's inner
cities, because they are crime-ridden ghettoes that were created by the federal government's welfare programs,
the Obama Administration is hell bent on turning America's
suburbs into outer city ghettoes with new federal welfare programs.
In short, the Obama Administration reasons that inner city ghettoes were
created because "whites" fled to the suburbs. Obama is
claiming that it is a racial issue rather than a government welfare problem. So he is now intent on
dragging illegal immigrant Hispanic children and their families to the suburbs to
"solve" this problem by implementing socialist welfare programs there.
As if socialist welfare programs in the suburbs will turn out differently
than socialist welfare programs in our major cities. The problem of
crime and poverty in our inner cities is not due to whites fleeing to the
suburbs. The problem is socialist welfare programs per se, not the
fleeing of whites, or anybody else, to the suburbs. It is becoming
more and more obvious that President Obama is turning into an Imperialistic
dictator and becoming very vindictive when Congress and ordinary citizens
rebuke him for his socialist actions. In his zeal to redistribute the
ethnic demographics of suburbia in America, Obama has turned into a
trafficker of human beings, specifically children, in a mad attempt to
implement his national socialist political objectives. Obama is
implementing the very racism he says suburbanites created by fleeing
America's ghettoes. His solution is ridiculous
because his stated "problem" is false. Socialist welfare programs in
America's major cities is not due to whites fleeing to suburbia. Obama's
continual attack against the ideas of freedom embedded in our
US Constitution and Bill of Rights shows that he is a stupid individual, not
an intelligent person who follows objective logic and reason. We do
not need the government to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to ship
illegal immigrants to communities in a wild ass attempt to play social
engineering games with Americans. Obama
should be careful since he is walking a thin line now as even Democrats are
beginning to wise up to his true intentions and actions. It is rumored
that border patrol agents in the DHS are refusing to allow their DHS bosses
to send in swat teams against suburban protestors who are blocking busloads of Illegals
to travel into their communities. There is mutiny in the border patrol
ranks, as border patrol officers are refusing to act against their fellow
American citizens. Hopefully this will get back to the Central
American countries and thus bring a halt to Obama's
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
bull$hit program. Oh by the way, how many Abduhls are sneaking across
the border with suitcase nukes, pretending to be Jose, Maria's uncle, in
this latest Obama fiasco? Raise your hand if you still think Obama is
not intentionally trying to destroy what he thinks is "imperialist" America.
July 15, 2014 A Texas rancher near the Mexican border where thousands
of Illegals traipse across his property every year discovered an interesting
book along his fence line: an Urdu to English/English to Urdu
dictionary. What is Urdu? Urdu is the major native language of
Pakistan. Conclusion: some of the Illegals traipsing across our
southern borders are not South Americans, they are Middle Easterners.
One can assume that these Middle Eastern Illegals are quite possibly
Jihadist terrorists blending in with Illegals from Mexico, Honduras, and
Guatemala who the Obama Administration have encouraged to flood across
America's borders to overwhelm our border patrol. How did the Obama
Administration accomplish this? By sending information to said above
nations that if they send youths 18 years or younger, or said youths
accompanied by relatives, they cannot be deported under recent American law
signed by former Prez George Bush. How do we know that the Obama
Administration purposely planned this Illegal immigration from
non-contiguous South American countries? Simple. We have the
proof. In Feb 2014, the Dept of Homeland Security sent out an RFQ --
Request for Quote -- to venders who could accommodate -- food, clothing,
transportation -- a huge influx of Illegals from Central America, which the
RFQ said could exceed over 65,000 immigrants this summer, 2014. In
other words, the Obama Administration not only communicated this information
to Central American nations, they set up a budget to pay for this mass
exodus, and asked vendors to bid on it. The RFQ email is easily
obtained on the Internet. In addition, the US sends hundreds of
millions of dollars in foreign aid to each of these Central American nations
each year -- as well as some $500 million annually to Mexico, God only knows
what for. All of these nations' governments are in cahoots with their
local drug cartels running the Obama Administration's abuse of children
immigration scheme. Last year, some 6,000 or so Illegal youths ran
across the border. This year it is over 55,000. Next year it is
estimated to be over 150,000. This is truly an abuse of children that
Obama is participating in since many of the children are sexually abused en
route and sent into "sex slave" markets once they leave their home country.
To say that President Obama doesn't know about this child abuse means that
he doesn't have a clue about what his Dept of Homeland Security is doing or
else he does know and doesn't give a damn. The fact is, Obama refuses
to even look into this problem because it is obvious from his recent TV
appearances that he supports it and even helped create it. Whether
Obama is aware of the Middle Eastern terrorists who are coming across the
border with the Illegal South Americans, we don't know. But we can
guess. If he doesn't know, he's not paying attention to his daily
intelligence reports. If he does know, he's guilty as hell for the
future havoc that may result from his dereliction of duty. In
addition, the Obama Administration has sent tons of lawyers to the border to
help the Illegals immigrate into the US and has forbid DHS employees to take
cell phone pictures for the news media as well as making each DHS employee
sign a nondisclosure agreement to keep this information quiet. This
constitutes malice aforethought and proves the point that Obama has placed
himself in a position of treason against America. And, our US DOJ Eric
Holder, is standing firm with President Obama on this issue. That
means the Dept of Justice, in cahoots with the Executive Dept, is purposely
laying the groundwork for another possible internal Jihadist attack against
America. Why? All you have to do is look at who Obama and Holder
grew up with, who influenced their social-political-economic views and you
have your answer. And all of this -- all of it -- was known long
before Obama was elected President of the US. Of course if anybody
were to bring this up, they would be called a racist. Look for a
future incident by Jihadists in America, and then prepare for Obama to call
for martial law, suspending the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution which
he has publicly spoken against throughout his entire life. He has told
you in no uncertain terms where he stands and what he is intending to do to
America. Believe him, he really means it. He is the Pied Piper
for many youths, not just American suckers who were brought under his spell
and voted for him, but also South American suckers who are being enticed
into the US by drug coyotes. In the long run, this is a case of the
blind leading the blind.
June 29, 2014 Now that the US has lost the war in Iraq, and the Mulsim
Jihadists have taken back most of the major cities in Iraq, President Obama
is sending 300 military "ADVISORS" -- really, "advisors?" -- back into
that hell hole in order to... do what? Nobody knows since there is never a
stated objective to the war in the Middle East. Is it to retrain the
same American-trained Iraqi military deserters who threw down their weapons
and uniforms the minute they saw the ISIS Jihadists storming across the
desert? The US taxpayer has spent a trillion dollars to: build the
largest consulate in the world in Baghdad, supply Iraq with military
weapons from guns and bullets to tanks and rocket propelled grenades and
uniforms and lollipops for whichever Muslim regime happens to be in charge
at any given time, and nothing has stopped the onslaught of the Muslim Jihadists in the Middle East. In fact, all of these military supplies
-- what a shock -- have now fallen into the hands of the Muslim Jihadists
and are being used against us. Follow the money. The Federal
Reserve is cleaning up by printing up trillions of non-backed Petro Dollars
and financing the Middle East war.
The Military Industrial Complex is cleaning up selling tons of equipment to
the Camel Drivers of the Middle East. Obama and Hillary are bungling
everything by trying to run guns in a "fast and furious" debacle to whom they
thought were our supporters with weapons ending up in the wrong hands. When Obama
and Hillary tried to fix their bungling, the result was the Benghazi murders of our
US Ambassador and others in Libya. Obama claimed the US was out of the Middle
East, the war was over, we won, la-dee-dah and Michelle Obama is busy
sucking on purple lollipops at the Vatican. Give us a break, Mr.
President. Did we learn nothing from Vietnam, where we sent in
thousands of "advisors" over and over until we finally had to cut and run,
leaving Saigon to the Viet Cong, Chicoms, and NVA? Wake up Obama; read
a history book. Hint: you cannot "PARTNER" with Third World
nations to fight their petty little civil wars unless you are serious about
fighting it no holds barred. Otherwise, it will backfire on
you. As usual, the Third World "trainees" will take your money and
run, and then revolt against you. For many reasons. Social,
political, economic, cultural. Now that the war in Iraq is ha-ha
"over," and the Muslim Jihadists are storming back in and taking over, Obama
wants to send $500 million more dollars to the Syrian Army to help fight
against the ISIS Jihadists storming across Iraq. But wait. We
already did that. May I remind the President that the composition of
the ISIS Jihadists storming across Iraq include those who the US previously
supplied money and arms to in Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, and Lower Slobovia.
We are simply financing our own destruction with no logical military,
social, political or economic objective in mind. If you are really
going to fight a war, then fight it. Otherwise, why not just lock
yourself in a room and throw hand grenades at your own ass? When will
the US politicians learn that until the people themselves in the Middle East
rise up against the Muslim Jihadists instead of just sitting there with
their thumbs up their butts, no amount of American or any other foreign aid
will change the social political economics of the Middle East. Like
Vietnam, politicians should not be running the war. Anybody
with half a brain can figure out that President Obama's actions are about 2
millimeters away from outright supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and the
Caliphate now forming in the Middle East. On the US home front of this
same battle, look for Muslim terrorists sneaking across the Mexican-US
border mixed in with Obama's purposely-created onslaught of Central American
youth flooding across our southern borders to create a crisis for ICE and
our border patrol. This, too, will backfire as these hidden terrorists
could easily bring in suitcase nukes, fan out across the US to hook up with
their clandestine "bros" and detonate said bombs anywhere in the US.
After which time, Obama can then claim martial law, which will ignite a US civil war,
and then it could escalate into WW III throughout Europe as their enclaves
of millions of Muslim Jihadists living in European ghettoes revolt against
their host countries. I'm talking about France, Germany, Britain, etc. Pay
attention Americans. Obama's Daily Dose of Crises all across the US is
becoming very revealing -- and tiresome. It's his idea of an American Caliphate:
The IRS debacle, the NSA folly, the VA Medical Joke, the Bergdahl-Gitmo
Trade Absurdity, the Borderless Border Bombshell, and the ObamaCare Fiasco,
to mention just a few. President Obama has BIG plans for you and they
all revolve around his "fundamentally changing America" to pay for what he
thinks is the "Imperialism" and "Colonialism" by America in the past.
Just like Mommy and Daddy taught him. And, so far, nobody is stopping Obama, The Pied Piper, who history is already revealing will probably be the
worst president ever for the US. Philosophically speaking, we are in a
war of the individual vs. the collective, a war of ideas: individual/private property rights and responsibilities vs. the Omnipotent
Collectivist State. So far, the Collectivist State is winning. Welcome
to The Borg.
June 22, 2014 Pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends.
Looks like we now live in the novel '1984' in which up is down, left is
right, black is white, and non-existent WMDs in Iraq have suddenly appeared
out of nowhere right in the middle of Iraq. The ISIS Muslim Jihadists
have now taken over a big chunk of Iraq, including a compound at which
Saddam Hussein stored chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.
Hey, wait a minute. Up until two weeks ago, all the news media in
America have been reporting for a decade that the US invaded Iraq and found no WMDs.
Now, all the news media are reporting that ISIS Jihadists are in control of
Saddam Hussein's non-existent WMDs. So which is it? Was Saddam
Hussein harboring WMDs or not? Are we living in Alice in
Wonderland in which for 10 years there are no WMDs in Iraq and then all of a
sudden there are now WMDs? Welcome to the world in
which the Cheshire Cat stands on his own head, mice pop up out of tea pots
singing, "Twinkle, twinkle lit bat, how I wonder where're you're at," and
blonde babes fall down rabbit holes to discover the Queen of Hearts.
Uh-huh. Next thing you know, Barack Obama will turn up with a real
birth certificate showing how he was born at the Alamo in San Antonio,
Texas, on the 4th of July and fought alongside Jim Bowie.
June 15, 2014 OK, It's Sunday. What new crisis has the Obama
Administration created now? At the beginning of last week, like
Monday, it was the VA Medical crisis. 70% of the VA Medical centers
across the US were creating fraudulent lists of VA signups in order to lie
to their bosses in Washington about what a wonderful job they were doing for
our military veterans so Administrators in the VA medical facilities could pull down big salary raises. Then,
for Tuesday's crisis of the day, the
President traded US Army deserter Sgt Bowe Bergdahl for the release of five
hardened Taliban mass murderers from Gitmo. This was done to (a) cover
up the VA Medical Mess dominating the news media, and (b) allow Obama to
openly support the Muslim Brotherhood while pretending to save one poor,
captured, tortured soldier who -- lies upon lies -- "honorably served" in
the US Army. Then, by Wednesday, we had Obama's next "created crisis"
-- right out of his socialist playbook: tens of thousands of South
American illegals ran across our southern borders to claim, "Yarriba, OK, I
surrender, send me to Detroit or Honolulu." Hundreds of thousands of illegals who
are under age 18 and thus cannot be "legally" deported turned in their
coupons for free tickets to ride to any city in the US. Yahoo for Obama, trying to create a bigger Democratic voting class by playing Border
Santa Claus. Then, for Friday's crisis of the day to cover up all the news about the illegals storming across the border to become future Democrats, Obama
revealed how he had no idea whatsoever that the Islamic-Syrian-Iraqi-Dinkleberries
(ISIS) had blitzkrieged across most of Iraq, taking no prisoners, reclaiming
major cities, and were on the verge of taking back Baghdad. Where was
Obama during his intelligence briefing on Thursday? Who knows, but on
Friday he jumped into his Air Force One Playboy Jet, flew off to California
and and gave a fund-raiser speech to students at Low to No IQ High School. In
the afternoon, he played golf in Palm Springs which has over 120 golf
courses in the middle of a water drought. What's Obama going to
do about Iraq? Nothing since it was, multiple choice: (a) George
Bush's fault, (b) we have the Taliban "on the run," (c) everything is
"looking stable and secure," or (d) I hope Ghana beats the US in the World
Cup next Monday because I like basketball. For those who still don't get it, Obama is purposely
creating crisis after crisis after crisis via the Saul Alinsky Revolution by
Method that he learned from Marxist Mommy and Daddy and Granny and Grandpa
-- plus tutors on Mercer Island in Seattle during his youth -- to totally
overthrow America's Constitution and free market capitalism. So what
is the new big Saul Alinsky crisis that Obama and his Behind The Scenes
Brown Shirts plan on staging? Martial law? A civil war?
World War III? Hey, what ever happened to the initial atrocity against
America called ObamaCare?
June 14, 2014 Wow, Border Babies Invade US Southern Borders.
What a coincidence that tens of thousands -- soon to be hundreds of thousands
-- of Guatemalan, Honduran, Mexican,
and other Hispanic youths under age 18 have all shown up simultaneously to
dash across the borders of our southern states: Arizona, New Mexico,
Texas, and California. After dashing across the border and purposely
running right into the arms of the astonished American border patrol, the
illegal immigrants smooch them and yell, "OK, I give up!" Since it's
against the law to deport youths 18 years or younger, the American border
patrol has no other choice except to sign them up as "visitors," hand them a
piece of paper to sign that says, "Uh-huh, you betchum, I promise to return
to the local courthouse in San Antonio or Nogales or Dry Gulch next Tuesday
to plead my case," and then the border patrol gives them a free ticket --
courtesy of the American taxpayers -- to go to ANY city they want in the
United States. Of course, the illegal immigrants NEVER show up to
court and hippity-hop with their cell phones to whatever city they choose.
I'd pick Honolulu. Surf's up. How about you? The Big
Question is: who sent out the email to everybody in South America
it's Free Immigration Season in the United States? Some political
analysts say it's just part of President Barack Obama's Big Plan to
"fundamentally transform America." All the hundreds of thousands of
illegal immigrants pouring into the US over our southern borders are
expected to be very grateful to Uncle Obama, their new Sugar Santa Claus, by
voting for Obama's National Socialist Party, aka the Democrats, in the very
near future. It would be rather hilarious if the new illegals jumped
party lines and voted instead for the Republicans. Like, what do they
know about one political party from another? Most of them can't even
spell "Obama." If the GOP was smart, they would send Welcome Wagons
filled with tacos and pinatas and yell, "Welcome to America, vote for me!"
Too bad nobody is passing out free birth control pills, too. Oh, by
the way, how many Al Qaeda terrorists with the knowledge about how to build
nuclear suitcase bombs are sneaking across the border with all the illegals?
Apparently nobody knows and, what's worse, Obama doesn't really care.
May 31, 2014 Obama dumped VA Health Secretary Eric Shinseki yesterday
not because of all the deaths and mismanagement that have been going on over
the last umpteen years at the VA Medical centers but rather because he has to cover up the fact that
what happened at the VA medical centers is exactly what socialized health
care -- specifically ObamaCare -- must inexorably morph into in the future.
The problem is not personnel; the problem is the system per se, the state
collectivist nature of the system. What
happened at the VA would never have happened in a free market. Heads would have rolled a long
time ago and any medical system that operated as the VA did would have gone bankrupt.
Medical clients in an open market would have immediately
opted out for another competing medical facility. The VA medical
debacle in which vets were not put on waiting lists, never seen by doctors,
and other vets put on fake lists for two weeks after waiting on another list for
months or years so the fake two-week list could be sent to VA bosses in
Washington in order to
obtain salary raises and bonuses is exactly the type of socialist
bureaucratic crap that will occur under ObamaCare. That is why
President Obama had to quickly dismiss VA Sec Shinseki: to stop the
continued investigation and get on with the pretended solution to this
socialist VA medical problem. Think about it: why couldn't the VA medical
system simply be a voucher system in which returning vets could go to their
own private doctors? We didn't have to create a state collectivist VA
medical system, but we did. And now we see the results. Is
anybody learning from this? It's no
different than the socialist medical systems in Sweden, Britain, Germany,
Cuba, China, the former USSR and all other countries that have tried
socializing their health care systems. And this goes for all commodities or
services in the market, not just health care. The postal service, Amtrak, etc. lose billions of dollars
every quarter and still we persist in financing these economic albatrosses. Will America learn its lesson from
the VA health care debacle? Probably not. Because Americans do
not see it as endemic to the system of state collectivism; they see the
problem as one of personnel. Just change the guy in charge and
socialism -- if they even recognize it as such -- will work, they think.
It's not the socialist in charge that makes the system unworkable; it's the
system itself. Mainly because it violates all universal laws such as
the Law of Identity and the Law of Cause and Effect. Socialism is
simply Communism on the installment plan. The US will end up in a
civil war and an international war unless Americans finally figure out that
state collectivism -- Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's progressive
socialism -- is the problem. Free minds and free markets
are the answer, not more government controls.
May 27, 2014 Everybody should take a good look at how the US Veterans
hospitals are run. The are a foreshadowing of how the ObamaCare
national health care system will run, only much much worse since it will be
huge. Notice that not only are the VA medical facilities not
responsive to their clients, they have fabricated phony lists to report to
their bosses in Washington DC how
great they are doing. Two medical lists: one
listing when the veteran first called or signed up for care, and then
another list -- a false list -- of updated calls and sign ups for care for
the months or years AFTER the real doctor's visit or call. In other
words, the VA centers were lying to their bosses in DC, rigging the updated
listing of patient visits to show that the patients were being taken care of
in a timely fashion when, in reality, patients were lingering for months or
years without any contact or care whatsoever. Some 40 or more patients
died while waiting for the VA medical center to respond to them. No
hospital in the private sector would dare treat their clients this way.
They would soon go out of business. But government bureaucracies do
not have to respond to their clients, only their Washington DC bosses to get
pay raises. Watch out Americans. If you think the VA medical
debacle is bad, wait until we get full blown ObamaCare.
May 16, 2014 What's the Vatican up to lately? Pope Francis says all
governments should redistribute their peoples' wealth to the poor,
downtrodden masses. How droll. How about if Pope Francis and His
Merry Gang of Cardinals redistribute their $10 fricking billion dollars
worth of art, gold, silver, and bank accounts to all the poor, downtrodden
masses first, you know, as a sign of good faith
-- pun intended? I mean, what the hell
-- pun intended -- is one of the major Earth religions doing with billions
and billions of dollars worth of idol worship and other Earthly junk?
Rumor has it that two previous Popes were actually poisoned (made to look like a
heart attack, beep-beep, heart attack, uh huh, you bet) by an inner circle of Vatican
Cardinals who were being investigated for siphoning off millions of bucks
for themselves. So Pope Francis is proposing all governments institute
altruistic state collectivism -- a polite term for socialism, fascism, and
communism -- as great forms of social political economic institutions.
Has Pope Francis not read recent history of the last 100 years? Does
he really not understand how socialism in all countries that have tried it
has turned into the most murderous regimes ever recorded, including the
Holocaust? Has he not been to North Korea, Communist China, the former
USSR, the Middle East, Cuba and on and on? Does Pope Francis have his
holy history-head stuck up his dumbed down derriere? Has he not heard of
individual rights and free markets as the best provider and natural
distributor of wealth in the entire history of humankind on planet Earth?
Capitalism has lifted millions up out of poverty while socialism has
enslaved and murdered millions. What are we supposed to think of the
moral philosophy of the Vatican when the Head Cardinal, Pope Francis, utters
such social political economic nonsense as redistributing the wealth created
May 16, 2014 Just spent the last hour listening to the Idaho Governor
debates on Idaho Public TV. Coupla loons in there, for sure.
Well, it wasn't Harvey D. Brown, the crazy biker and it wasn't Bayes the
Bearded Bible Banger.
The fact that everybody knows that Gov Otter insisted on including Brown and
Bayes in the Governor's debate does not bode well for him. I think Senator
Russ Fulcher will gain a few notches on the votes in next Tuesday's Primary
Elections because most individuals in Idaho hate ObamaCare (implemented by
Gov Otter), dislike federal control of education (Common Core), and want the
feds off Idaho lands. Those are the issues and everybody knows Gov Otter has
failed miserably on all of them. The other important issue -- as
Senator Russ Fulcher pointed out -- is that Idaho's budget is 36% in hock to
the federal government. What does that mean? That means the
federal government currently owns Idaho. If Idaho doesn't do what the
feds say, Washington pops the monetary tit right out of Idaho's mouth and
forces us into bankruptcy. Think Idaho education dollars; think think
health care dollars; think all kinds of other money and earmarks coming to
Idaho from the federal government. It's like being in extortion debt
to The Mob. How does one ever get out from under it? And who
pays for this? 49 other states through taxation and hyperinflation of
our monetary system by the Federal Reserve, printing up bogus dollars.
Idaho is somebody's slave and that somebody is the federal government.
President Obama says, "JUMP!" and Gov Otter says, "HOW HIGH?" Because
Otter thinks he's a "realist."
It doesn't matter how many Idaho legislators were tricked into voting for
ObamaCare, initially, by Gov Otter and his insurance cronies. It matters
what the majority of voters think today, NOW, after seeing all the dismal
results of ObamaCare at the national level, and the BLM land grab fiasco in
Nevada last month.
Also, RomneyCare just went belly up in Taxachussets. Another RINO who
pushed for ObamaCare. ObamaCare totally failed in Maryland and Oregon.
The FBI is investigating the Oregon health care failure, which lost millions
of dollars. Same for many other states who can't spell "free market"
for health care, education, or any other market commodity. Current
high health care costs are not due to a free market. They are due to
previous presidents' Lyndon Johnson and George Bush governmental
interference into the health care market.
When Otter says as Governor, one must face "reality" -- he said it over and
over -- he was claiming that he must cave to the "reality" of Washington DC.
Namely, the presumed power of the federal government. This is how all
national dictators gain power: they obtain the sanction of their victims.
Obama gained the sanction of Gov Otter. Gov Otter has thus made Idaho
a "victim" and has, acquiesced to federal power. That's how the victims turn
into supporters of their own oppressors, granting them power, thinking that
later, some day, they will overcome their national dictators, which rarely
happens. Example, Austria in the 1930s, was tricked by the Third Reich into
becoming a victim in order to receive "free" education, "free" health care,
and voted 98% to become part of Hitler's German Regime. Then Adolph
lowered the boom and the victims who sanctioned their own chains found out,
too late. Fast forward to Idaho and Gov Otter. History repeats itself.
Welcome to Atlas Shrugged.
All in all, the left Liberal Idaho Statesman and the left Liberal panelists
asking the questions won the Governor's debate in that they got to host a
GOP RINO circus on Idaho Public TV that was probably picked up by national news
syndicates. Left Liberal House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi probably tuned
in and had her first orgasm. But, I also think that Idaho's Senator Fulcher
gained a lot of credibility because he stuck to his points and was the most
"normal" person in the debate. Fulcher has a very good chance of winning the
Governorship and then everybody will forget about the two loonies that Gov
Otter foisted upon the IPTV debates.
May 11, 2014 If you haven't been paying attention to politics over the last
five years, the Obama Administration has committed a whole host of unlawful
actions against the American people, all on the premise that those in power
know what's best for everybody else. Senator Ted Cruz and others have
listed some 75 or so violations of the law, among them being Obama's taking
over of General Motors, stripping the original investors of their stock
holdings, and giving the proceeds to the United Auto Workers Union (the UAW),
implementing an unlawful act to force Americans to purchase an economic
commodity whether they want to or not, namely nationalized health care,
running guns and ammo to the wrong terrorists in Libya and covering up a
murderous attack against our Libyan Embassy when attempting to buy back the
weapons, blaming the attack on a ridiculous Youtube movie by some Hollywood
loonie which has since been disproved as the cause of the Libyan terrorist
attack, allowing and encouraging the IRS to selectively target Conservative
political groups -- and not one Democratic group -- who tried to qualify for
tax exempt status, the President claiming he was born in the US and thus
qualifies to be a US President when all evidence points to the opposite with
witnesses dying left and right, and the list goes on and on ad infinitum.
In fact, that is part of the Obama national socialist policy to completely
usurp the US Constitution and drag the entire United States into a socialist
political culture in keeping with all the Marxist and state collectivist
claptrap that he was taught by his parents and educational mentors
throughout his life. That the American Democrats, US left Liberals and
European socialists -- and perhaps, depending on whether German translations
are correct, even the Plejaren and/or their followers in the Billy Meier
movement -- have not been able to see, to easily predict, what is obvious to
even the most casual Libertarian or Tea Party American, is extremely
distressing since they are walking right into the typical trap set by the
altruistic state collectivists past and present (among which include
past tyrants such as Mussolini, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Chavez, and
Castro to mention just a few) and now our current wanna-be tyrants, such as
Barack Obama and former Sec of State Hillary Clinton. What is
preventing the above-mentioned categories of social political economic
observers from extrapolating that which philosophers such as Ayn Rand
explicitly made crystal clear? Why can't they see where the current
actions of the Obama Administration -- or the beginning actions of
historical state collectivists -- will inexorably lead to? Left
Liberals and socialists in the US and Europe as well as individuals in most
other nations on Earth have a lame excuse: they are not thinking
logically and only think in terms of disconnected thought globs instead of
logically-related concepts. State collectivisms are so illogical they must re-think every single action
as if those actions were new or do not fall
into previously thought-out concepts long ago disproved. Thus, nothing
makes sense to them and they have to re-invent their conceptual "wheels" for
every social political and economic act.
Most of the time they get it wrong and obviously cannot or do not connect
the conceptual dots. Adding to this, the left Liberal socialists think
that everything is relative, malleable, and not an objective absolute.
To them, there are no universal laws, in physics or political economy.
Black can be white, a train can be a cup, water can be sand, depending on
the moment, thus violating the basic universal law of identity.
Extrapolating to social political economics, robbery can now be a simple
"redistribution" of wealth. National health care forced down
everybody's throats -- a violation of individual rights -- becomes an OK
economic policy. Once these immoral outrages become commonplace law,
all truths can be thrown out the window. Robbery, murder, and looting
by the government become the law. The law becomes opposite of the
truth. The concept that all individuals are born with rights to their
own bodies, minds, and souls gets thrown out the moral philosophical window
as the "rights of the recipient" of robberies, murders, and looting by the
government become accepted and sanctioned by the victims themselves.
All based upon who can "prove" they are the most "needy." Witness how Americans continue to vote for those politicians who abuse
their rights. And that is exactly where we are on planet Earth
today: the altruistic state collectivists in all nations have now
obtained the sanction of their victims. Even those in the universe who
claim that all individuals have a right to choose their own non-conflicting
actions and must be responsible for their own acts, have apparently fallen
for the state collectivist claptrap on Earth. At least, until they
jump onto a chronin time flow and travel to the "future" to see the results
of that which is happening today. It is not difficult to predict the
future outcome of America and the world at large if the current moral
philosophical trend of state collectivism does not change. And one
does not have to time travel to "predict" it. In fact, if one can only
"predict" the future through time travel, rather than extrapolating
conceptually, then one must not be able to understand how current concepts
lead to future events. There is, after all, a big difference in
extrapolating how action A leads to action B leads to action C, and having
to jump to the future through physics to find out. Which means one is
still not able to figure out the "how" and "why" a particular "future" will
happen. Which means further that one is doomed to repeat one's
inability to extrapolate conceptually and thus will fall into the same, in
this case, state collectivist claptrap. Not being able to predict that
the state collectivist actions of the Third Reich, for example, must
inexorably lead to
The Holocaust is no different than the inability to predict that the state
collectivist actions of the Obama Administration must lead to a similar
outcome: a probable civil war in the US and WW III. Wake up people.
History is about to repeat itself... and for the very same reasons.
May 02, 2014 Ah ha! So now we have the smoking gun
connecting the dots between the White House
-- President Obama himself and his Oval Office thugs -- and the terrorist
attack in Benghazi in which our Libyan ambassador and 3 Americans were
killed on 9/11/2012. That is, it has now been revealed that everybody
in the White House, including President Obama, knew that the attack on our
Benghazi consulate was NOT due to some ridiculous Youtube video on the
Internet -- as Obama and his cohorts had all been claiming for months and
months after it was already disproven -- but rather the Behghazi fiasco was
a pre-planned terrorist attack against
our embassy. In an email by one of Obama's inner circle staff
members, the author, Ben Rhodes, stated that talking points for Susan Rice's
appearance on five major TV media talk shows should stress that the Benghazi
attack was not due to the President's foreign political policies but rather
due to what everybody already knew was not true: the infamous Youtube
video making fun of Mohammad. Copied on the receipt of this smoking
gun email was one of Sec of State Hillary Clinton's minions.
Therefore, Hilly knew about the cover-up, too. Even the CIA, who said
they provided the "talking points" from their people working at CIA
headquarters in Langley, VA, instead of relying on CIA field reports at the
scene of the crime, claim that they did not know about any Youtube video
being the cause of the Benghazi attack. Looks like a lot of people at
the White House and State Department have been lying their butts off and
need to get their fairytales in synch. So now that the US House
Committee investigating the Benghazi debacle had to obtain this email info
from a third party journalist who had to obtain it from a court order
Freedom of Information Act -- instead of it being voluntarily sent to the
House two years ago when Chairman Issa asked the White House for all
Benghazi information, where do we go from here? One thing is for sure:
Obama's US Attorney General, Eric Holder, is not going to bring charges against members of
the White House since he's already up to his eyeballs in a dozen other
obstruction of justice issues involving the White House. Nobody's going to investigate
The only avenue left open is for the US Congress to set up a bipartisan
committee to investigate Obama and his Brown Shirt thugs running rampant all
over the White House, implementing programs that socialist and communist
dictators in other countries could only dream they had the power to implement.
And which RINOs in Congress are going to have the cajones to set up such a
Republican House Leader John Boehner? Any Democrats? We shall
see. But now we at least know the truth: it has finally been outted. Obama and Hillary appear to have an unholy alliance about what
the Benghazi terrorist attack was really all about: namely, another
one of Obama's "Fast and Furious" gun running deals (like with the Mexican
drug cartels) that went haywire -- providing arms and ammo to the Mid-East
and about which neither Obama nor Hillary can comment or tell the truth
without incriminating themselves. And these are the political a$$holes
running our country. Make that RUINing our country. There is no
difference between Germany's Third Reich in the 1930s and today's Obama
government. If nothing changes, we can expect the same results as in
the Third Reich.
Apr 24, 2014 Those Conservatives -- Glenn Beck, Krauthammer, and O'Reilly --
and others who are now attacking Rancher Cliven Bundy for his First
Amendment right to say what he believes about various ethnic groups should
take a giant step back and answer the following ad hominem debating ruse
usually uttered by junior debaters in high school: can a prostitute be
a witness to a murder? In other words, the fact that Bundy is not an
intellectual academic with a Phd in the English language does not lessen the
fact that the federal government has overstepped its bounds in attacking
Bundy's ranch, killing his cattle, and attempting to usurp land in Nevada
through nefarious court methodologies. If we want to judge people by
their statements, then President Obama and most of the politicians in
Washington DC should be strung up by their gonads for uttering all of their
pro-NAZI -- national socialist -- statements. The difference between
Bundy and, say, President Obama, is that Bundy is not trying to shove blacks
into slavery, but Obama is unquestionably trying to shove all of America
into economic slavery of the worst possible kind: altruistic state
collectivism under which millions of individuals have literally been
slaughtered throughout the last 100 years. The real issue in the Bundy
case still stands: the federal government vs. the individual.
And, by the way, the answer is yes, a prostitute can be a witness to a
murder. A witness or victim's lifestyle does not mean they are physically blind.
Same for Bundy. Wake up Glenn Beck, Krauthammer, and O'Reilly.
Time for you to go back to Moral Philosophy & Basic Logic 101A.
Apr 16, 2014 In a move lawmakers and farmers are calling “the biggest land
grab in the history of the world,” the Environmental Protection Agency is
requesting jurisdiction over all public and private streams in the United
States that are “intermittent, seasonal and rain-dependent.”
The EPA and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers in late March jointly released a proposed rule, Waters of
the United States, in an effort to clarify which streams and wetlands are
protected under the Clean Water Act.
A statement issued by the
EPA says “the proposed rule will benefit businesses by increasing efficiency
in determining coverage of the Clean Water Act.”
But some lawmakers strongly
According to congressional
budget testimony last week, Waters of the United States would give the EPA
authority over streams on private property even when the water beds have
been dry, in some cases for hundreds of years.
Calling it “the biggest land
grab in the history of the world,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman
Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky., said the “economic impact of that would be
“A community needing to
build on private land that had on it one of these so-called streams that you
considered a waterway under the new rule would have to travel thousands,
hundreds of miles to D.C., to get approval,” Rogers said.
The congressman argued it
“would absolutely freeze economic activity in this country.”
Rogers said the proposal is
“proof in and of itself of the mal-intent of this administration toward the
After what we've seen the
federal government's BLM try to do to Rancher Bundy last week in Clark
County, Nevada, and the fact that Nevada's Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
used 200 secret service agents to rustle Bundy's cattle and take so-called
BLM land for his own commercial profits (selling said land to a Chinese
solar company), why should we trust that the EPA in collusion with other US
Congressmen will not attempt to do the same thing if they control all the
land in the nation by redefining water rights? The last thing we need
in America is an extension of any government agency's power over our
individual and private property rights. The EPA, BLM, IRS, Fed Reserve
(a private banking consortium) and all the other thugster agencies need to
be abolished, not extended.
-- Mon Apr 14,
It's been one day after the BLM and 200 secret service agents called it
quits rustling Rancher Bundy's cattle in Nevada and left the scene of their
(the BLM's) crime. How many major news media have covered the real
reason why the BLM raided Bundy's Ranch? A big fat zero. As
suspected, the major TV news media are pretending that they do not know that
this entire debacle is all about Senator Harry Reid and his son's attempted
land grab to sell the property to the Chinese government to develop a $5
billion solar energy project. So much for ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC,
and FOX News. Let's see how long it takes them to pick up the real
facts of this story... if they ever do.
-- Sun Apr 13,
After lying about reaching their goal of 7 million people signing up for ObamaCare by March 31, 2014, Health and Human Services Director Kathleen
Sebelius resigned from her position. What's this all about? All
part of Obama's script. Since, in reality, Ms. Sebelius failed
miserably on ALL FRONTS of the implementation of ObamaCare, schedule-wise,
financially, and you-name-it, the Obama Administration first had to claim
victory and then get her out of her HHS position immediately after so they
could continue their phony victory lap. But it's not over.
Everybody and their brother knows that ObamaCare did not reach its goals, it
is still a bankrupt system that is depriving millions of citizens of their
previous health care policies and doctors, and it will eventually be
overturned either by future legislation or by the market itself.
National socialist health care systems are not financially feasible, they
are a violation of individual rights, and must by definition turn into
either bankrupt health rationing systems or simply go bankrupt. We are
now living in Orwell's 1984 with Washington politicians spewing out nothing
but lies lies and more lies.
-- Sun Apr 13,
News Flash!! Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid tried to grab a Nevada cattle rancher's leased land so Reid can build a $5 billion
Chinese solar project after selling said land to the Chinese. Hey, what's a hoppenink here? Over the
past several days, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and 200 secret
service agents armed with high powered sniper rifles and automatic weapons
descended upon cattle rancher Bundy and told him to get himself and his
cattle off the BLM's land. Why? Ostensibly, to save the desert tortoises.
But the desert tortoises were moved from this land to a compound in Nevada years ago and
are now actually being killed by the government because they ran out of budget money.
So much for this fake "endangered species."
Fake reason # 2: Rancher Bundy's cattle may wander onto nearby roads and
are, therefore, a hazard to the public, said the government. Really? One
stray cow may have been struck by
a car over the last 20 years. Wow and whoop-tee-doo. Open
grazing land near roads and highways are common all over the West and
warning signs are posted. Fake reason # 3: the
land belongs to the BLM. Buzz. Wrong. The grazing land in
question belongs to
Nevada, not the federal government. Rancher Bundy's family has been
farming watermelons and grazing cattle on this land since the 1800's.
Bundy refused to pay the BLM increased grazing fees back in 1994, claiming
they had no right to implement those fees on state-leased property.
The feds did nothing for 20 years. Now, all of a sudden, out of the
clear blue sky, the BLM and 200 secret service agents descended on Bundy's
grazing land and started swiping his cattle and tazing his sons and daughter
and anybody else who got in the way. Then, dum da dum... the
public finds out about this whacko attack against Rancher Bundy and a coupla
thousand armed cowboys and militia from other states descended upon the scene
to stand up for Bundy. Cowboys out-rustled the federal BLM cattle
rustlers and hauled Bundy's cattle back to his ranch. Traffic was
stopped and blockaded on Interstate-15. This entire hullabaloo soon went viral
on the Internet and independent news journalists started researching what's
a hoppenink down at the Bundy Ranch. As in, why is the BLM attacking some poor
rancher and trying to take his land using phony excuses? After about 5 nanoseconds of simple research,
Internet journalists discovered that Senator Harry Reid and his attorney son
have been working behind the scenes for several years to buy -- at dirt
cheap prices -- Bundy's cattle grazing land and sell it for a tidy profit to
a Chinese government energy company that the Reids have been setting up --
via federal legislation -- to build a $5 billion solar project. To
this end, the Reids have already talked the states of Nevada and Idaho into
building a federal Transmission line from Idaho Falls, Idaho and through
Nevada to -- ostensibly -- run the power from the Chinese solar project IF
IT IS SUCCESSFUL. So here's the upshot: Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid and his son have allegedly tried to pull off a land grab in
Nevada in order to sell state land to a Chinese solar company to make a
profit by selling the Chinese some grazing land. Yesterday, after a
standoff between armed BLM secret service thugs and armed cowboys from other
states, the feds called it quits and pulled out. The real reason,
however, is that Sen. Harry Reid got caught with his fraudulent pants down,
found out the news media was all over this scam, and no doubt President Obama weighed in and told him to cool it, dude. Now it remains to be
seen whether any of the major news networks will continue their
investigation and bring it to the attention of the judicial system.
Will anything happen to Senator Reid of Nevada? Time will tell but I
wouldn't bet on it.
-- Tue Apr 01,
Hallelujah! Just as the last day to sign up for ObamaCare in 2014
occurred yesterday at 11:59 pm midnight, President Obama and his National
Socialist Administration announced that they have reached their goal of
signing up 7.1 million people in their socialist health care system!
What a coincidence. They amazingly reached their goal of 7 million sign-ups
for ObamaCare. Who'd 'a ever thunk it, especially after failing
to reach their milestones every single month
since Oct 2013? Wow. What a last minute surge. But... there remain a zillion questions
concerning the numbers such as what constitutes "people who have signed up"
or "people who have actually paid for it" or "people who are new enrollees"
or... ? In short, we believe the government simply decided to redefine
the stats and lied about how many people have actually signed up for ObamaCare. All of these real or faked numbers are immaterial anyway
since the real issue is individual rights vs. government mandates,
individual rights vs. The Omnipotent State. It doesn't matter how many millions
did or did not sign up for ObamaCare. Your personal health care is a
private free market issue between you and your doctor. It is no
different than your right to choose what car to buy or not to buy a car at
all. Health care is just another commodity in the market over which
you, as an individual, should have total control vis a vis an exchange with
your choice of health care professionals. Health care is not an
individual right; education is not an individual right; having the
government provide you with a car or a computer or a home or any other
commodity is not an individual right. Rights are not commodities.
Rights are freedoms that you are born with. Rights are universal and
are not obtained from a government or a piece of paper. Those
individuals, such as
Republicans or Conservatives or Tea Partiers, etc., who are busy arguing
against ObamaCare based upon real or imagined statistical data instead of as a violation of
individual rights will lose this debate because their Democratic state
collectivist opponents will simply use statistics to lie and then claim
victory. Which is exactly what just happened yesterday. Today,
or soon, President Obama will probably show up on national TV and lie to the
public that his administration has reached their numerical goal of signing
up 7 million people for his socialist health care system and, thus, claim
program is right on schedule to save everybody from polio, cancer, and
stubbing their collective big toe on the way to their local pub.
Mar 28, 2014 In the No-Honor-Among-Thieves Dept, over ten bankers/traders
coincidentally died within the last several months. My, my, how
mysterious. According to Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge News, 5 guys
allegedly committed suicide, 2 guys fell from JP Morgan rooftops (one in
London, one in Hong Kong...how clumsy of them), one guy jumped in front of a
train, and one guy shot his own ass deader 'n a door nail with a nail gun.
The rest of the deaths are categorized as, "We don't know, investigation
pending." Meanwhile, central banking bankers in JP Morgan, B of A,
Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and others have been ordered to pay fines of over
$100 Billion while still making profits of over $76 Billion last year.
Yippee and yahoo, printing up unlimited supplies of dollars, yen, pounds,
and plastic cards still pays well. And Americans are now over $17
trillion in debt to, hmm, let's see now, oh yeah, their own silly little
selves for allowing Congress to allow the central bankers to hyper-inflate
our currency and call it a National Debt. Looks like the bankers are either knocking each other
off in a Gangsta Banksta War or those working in the financial districts
happen to be really really clumsy walking around on the roofs of buildings,
waiting for trains, handling nail guns, and playing with their kids' jump
ropes. So far, the following bankster/traders have kicked the bucket.
1 - William
Broeksmit, 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG,
was found dead in his home after an apparent suicide in South Kensington in
central London, on January 26th.
2 - Karl Slym,
51 year old Tata Motors managing director Karl Slym, was found dead on the
fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok on January 27th.
3 - Gabriel Magee,
a 39-year-old JP Morgan employee, died after falling from the roof of the JP
Morgan European headquarters in London on January 27th.
4 - Mike Dueker,
50-year-old chief economist of a US investment bank was found dead close to
the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State.
5 - Richard Talley,
the 57 year old founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colorado,
was found dead earlier this month after apparently shooting himself with a
6 - Tim Dickenson,
a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, also died last month,
however the circumstances surrounding his death are still unknown.
7 - Ryan Henry Crane,
a 37 year old executive at JP Morgan died in an alleged suicide just a few
weeks ago. No details have been released about his death aside from this
small obituary announcement at the Stamford Daily Voice.
8 - Li Junjie,
33-year-old banker in Hong Kong jumped from the JP Morgan HQ in Hong Kong
9 - James Stuart Jr,
Former National Bank of Commerce CEO, found dead in Scottsdale,
Ariz., the morning of Feb. 19. A family spokesman did not say what caused
10 - Edmund (Eddie)
Reilly, 47, a trader at Midtown’s Vertical Group, committed suicide
by jumping in front of LIRR train
Mar 14, 2014 Quote from the former Premier of the Czech Republic, Vaclav
Klaus: "The danger to America is not Barack
Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the
Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good
judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their
president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr.
Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince
of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that
made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who
is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude
of fools such as those who made him their president."
-- Wed Mar 05,
Ex IRS official Lois Lerner wrote in an email, "Tea Party cases are very
dangerous," in regard to granting them tax exemptions such as a 501 (c) (4)
for their political group. However, at a special Congressional
committee today in which Chairman Issa asked Ms. Lerner what she meant by her
email statement, Ms. Lerner exercised her Fifth Amendment rights and refused
to answer on the grounds that it may incriminate her. She stood on the
Fifth on several questions before Chairman Issa finally called the meeting
to a close. Ms. Lerner, the day before, wanted immunity in order to testify but she was
not granted immunity because nobody knows what her testimony would be in
order to grant her immunity. The bigger question is: if she did
nothing illegal, for what reason would she request immunity? Immunity
is usually for those who are admitting guilt but are making a deal to squeal
on others in exchange for that immunity. Just what does Ms. Lerner
want immunity for? Further, how can her answering questions about her
emails be incriminating unless she did something illegal? Looks like
somebody in the Obama Administration got to Ms. Lerner in the last two days
and either threatened the crap out of her or bought her off with some Xmas
presents... or both. At any rate, something stinks to high Heaven in
Washington DC, once again, vis a vis the IRS selectively targeting Conservative political
groups in their granting of IRS tax exemptions. Get this: no
Democratic political groups were denied IRS tax exemptions during the Obama
lower in the IRS food chain than Ms. Lerner needs to come forth and blow the
whistle on this entire stinking matter. We suspect it leads directly
to the White House and their attempts to thwart all Conservative political
groups from running against Obama's left Liberal socialists who now control
the government. And people wonder why Eric
Snowden who blew the whistle on the NSA gathering everybody's emails and
other communications had to flee the country and then
blow the whistle. Otherwise he would probably have ended up in jail or
dead. Or both. Welcome to the beginnings of Stalinist Russia and Nazi
Germany. That's how they did it; and now that's how the Progressives
in the US are doing it: taking over the entire nation with force and
Mar 01, 2014 Guess how many citizens in the great state of Oregon have
signed up for ObamaCare? Zero. Why? The geniuses in left
Liberal Oregon volunteered to implement ObamaCare as its own ObamaCare
project in a
new state health care exchange. So Oregon has spent millions and
millions of dollars on computer software for their state ObamaCare system
that, oops, doesn't work. If you live in Oregon, which of Obama's Executive
Orders are you, or your business, adhering to in order to fulfill the mandates
of the Affordable Care Act, i.e. ObamaCare? Do you follow the original mandates in the ACA law passed by Congress or the 28 Executive Order changes unilaterally
made by President Obama (illegally) without the vote of Congress.
Executive Orders are meant to clarify the verbiage of existing law, not to
re-write the mandates of existing law. And Idaho is not far behind
Oregon. Idaho's voluntary state health care exchange is a total bust,
too, with hundreds of thousands of Idahoans losing their current health care
policies, their doctors, and being encouraged to sign up for state Medicaid.
Unfortunately, there is not enough money in all the pockets of all the
citizens of Idaho to pay for the extrapolated increase in taxes to cover
this new Medicaid cost. Thank you, Gov Butch Otter, for shoving ObamaCare down the throats of Idaho's citizens. Hopefully, you will
not be serving a 3rd term for your RINO cohorts in Idaho after the Elections
Feb 18, 2014 As we have stated numerous times, President Barack Obama is
now moving into the 2nd level of the standard state collectivist personality
trait: the blame game. The 1st level was proposing state
collectivist economic programs such as national socialist health care,
government automobiles, or federal lollipops for everybody. The 2nd level
consists of the dictator, Obama in this case, blaming everybody except oneself when
his/her socialism fails. So what is the Obama administration
doing now? They're using the IRS to force businesses to sign a
document stating whether businesses laid off people because of budget cuts
due to ObamaCare. Think about that for a moment. By what
right does the Internal Revenue Service force businesses to state why said
may have cut employee expenses or any other reason, whether for higher health
care costs, higher production costs, or any other expense? And then
make it criminal if a business says "Oh yeah, I chopped 10 employees because
I couldn't pay their health care costs." We just can't wait for level
3 of Obama's dictatorial personality trait: "OK, all you guys who are
guilty of not trying hard enough to implement ObamaCare line up for the
train to your re-education center in Arizona where we will show you how to
sacrifice yourself for the good of the majority." Oh, and this is
immediately after President Obama stated in his interview with Bill O'Reilly
of FOX TV, "Oh no, Bill, the IRS was not involved in targeting Conservative
political groups to prevent them from obtaining 501 (c) (4) exemptions, not
even a SMIDGEON." Uh huh. And not even one Democratic political
group was turned down or harassed by the IRS. Not one.
Feb 17, 2014 In the Water Drought Hypocrisy Dept, Obama golfs at
water-guzzling desert golf courses while preaching about the California drought.
According to Patriot Update, "After preaching
shared sacrifice [FM Duck
Note: key word for state collectivists: shared sacrifice] to assuage the California water shortage, Obama has played
some of the country’s thirstiest golf courses. President Barack Obama
traveled to California Friday to highlight the state’s drought emergency at
two events near Fresno, calling for
shared sacrifice to help manage the
state’s worst water-shortage in decades. He then spent the rest of the
weekend enjoying the hospitality of some of the state’s top water hogs:
desert golf courses. Vacationing with DVDs of his favorite television
shows and multiple golf outings with his buddies, the duffer-in-chief played
at two of the most exclusive courses in the Palm Springs area. On Saturday, Obama played at the Sunnylands estate, built by the late billionaire Walter
Annenberg, which features a nine-hole course that is played like 18 holes.
The following day he golfed at billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison’s
19-hole Porcupine Creek. On Presidents’ Day, Obama hit the links at
Sunnylands once again. The 124 golf courses in the Coachella Valley
consume roughly 17 percent of all water there,
one quarter of the water pumped out of the
region’s at-risk groundwater aquifer,
according to the Coachella Valley Water District. Statewide, roughly one
percent of water goes to keep golf courses green. Each of the 124 Coachella
Valley courses, on average, uses nearly 1 million gallons a day due to the
hot and dry climate, 3-4 times more water per day than the average American
Water shortage, right? Not over-population?
Feb 16, 2014 President Barack Obama and his Progressive Boot Lickers are now
calling for the IRS to slap down all the Tea Party, Republican, Libertarian,
and Conservative political groups who are running ads against ObamaCare for
the 2014 Elections. Democrats who voted YES for ObamaCare are now
running for the exits and don't know what to do to convince voters that
ObamaCare is not a failure as some 6.5 million Americans have now lost their
health insurance and doctors. Calling for the IRS to save their little
state collectivist butts only one week after Obama was interviewed before
the Super Bowl Game, Obama stated that not only was the IRS not involved in
harassing Conservative political groups over the last two years but that
there was not even a "smidgeon" of involvement by the IRS. Ya-yesssss,
not even a "smidgeon." Uh-huh. One week later on national TV,
Senator Schumer called for the IRS to target Conservatives to stop them from
running campaign ads against the failure of ObamaCare. Schumer wins
the Cheshire Cat Big Fake Grin Award for 2014, surpassing Vice President Joe
Biden and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi in 2013. "Huyuck, I guess
we'll just have to read the 3,000 pages of ObamaCare to find out what's in
it, huyuck, giggle, snort," said Pelosi, as she spread more lipstick on her
big fat Pinocchio nose.
-- Thur Jan 30, 2014 President Obama lied through his pearly white
teeth in his State of the Union speech.
Lie # 1: The Obama administration has created over 8 million new jobs
over the last 4 years... yea, scream, screech, applause from the
Democratic socialists in the audience... but, oops, not true. Since
the start of Obama's dictatorship, only 3.2 million jobs have been created,
many of them PART TIME GOVERNMENT JOBS, and the US still has 1.2 million
fewer jobs than in 2007.
Lie # 2: Obama said, "Today, women make up about
one-half of America's work force, but they only make 77-cents for every
dollar that a man earns. That is wrong, and in 2014, it is an
embarrassment." ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic
socialists in the audience... Really? 77-cents? Buzz,
wrong, you lied, not true, Mr. President. Obama is using figures from
the Census Bureau and comparing apples with oranges regarding types of jobs.
In some jobs, paid hourly, women make 14-cents to 19-cents less than men
while in other jobs, salaried management, women earn just as much or
millions more than men. Salary is not the only comparison for total
compensation; women receive maternity leave that men do not. Many
women want to raise children; they do not want a CEO position, and on and
on. Obama is pretending that women are being frozen out of good jobs
in the work place and that is simply not true.
Lie # 3: Obama's shameless inflation of the
ObamaCare enrollment numbers. He said, "More than nine million
Americans have signed up for private health insurance or Medicaid coverage,"
implying that these numbers are the result of his Affordable Health Care
program. ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic
socialists in the audience... 6.3 million of the Medicaid numbers are
HIGHLY questionable, earning a rating of 3 lying Pinocchios from industry
sources. And 3 million of the private insurance members from ObamaCare
statistics are absolutely false. ObamaCare stats counts the number of
people who logged onto the ACA Healthcare.gov system, NOT the number of
people who successfully obtained health care and paid their first premium.
How do we know this? Because the software for the insurance payment
has not been written yet. In reality, if you haven't finished
enrolling or even made a payment, you are not insured. The fact is,
over 6 million people have LOST their current health insurance due to
ObamaCare and the new rules his program has imposed upon America.
ObamaCare has actually gone backwards, accomplishing exactly the opposite of
its socialist goals? Wow, where have we seen that before? Not
only that, but software consultant after software consultant has testified
to Congress that the ObamaCare computer system is not safe, is hackable by
identity thieves, and has, in fact, already been hacked. Yet,
President Obama was pretending in his State of the Union speech that
ObamaCare is a raging success while the facts show that it is a resounding
failure. Plus, it cost the American taxpayer over $680 million, almost
$600 million more than the original estimate, and it ain't over yet, folks.
The Obama administration just issued another $90 million software contract
to a new group to try to save the current failure.
Meanwhile, Human & Health Services Director Kathleen
Sebelius sat there during Obama's SOTU speech and received a standing
ovation from the Democratic socialists for the lies being told about her
system. She should be fired immediately and President Obama should be
impeached for lying to the American people and illegally changing the ACA
mandates (i.e. legislation passed by Congress) with Executive Orders that
violate his limited statutory authority granted in the US Constitution.
So much for all the imperial pomp and circumstance at
President Obama's latest State of the Union pack of lies.
-- Wed Jan 29, 2014 Ah yes, the President's State of The Union address
last night. What did he tell us? Both overtly and between the
lines? Overtly President Obama aggressively put forth his ideology of
Marxist socialism. As predicted, he has now passed the point of
insinuating the implementation of his socialist principles by using
mamby-pamby words such as "hope and change" and "fundamentally change
America." Now that his socialist programs have failed, the economy is
approaching ruins, people have lost their jobs, lost their health insurance,
and the wars in the Middle East are still raging, President Obama -- like
all previous socialist dictators before him in every nation -- is now openly
displaying his anger. He now says he is not going to work with the US
Congress to do anything. He is going to sign off on dictatorial
Executive Orders to bypass the checks and balances of the US Constitution.
He is the President of "No Authority." It is not the number of EOs
that he is issuing that's the major problem; it is the substantive depth of
the changes that the EOs are intended to bring about. Total
dictatorial authority. There is no statutory authority for President
Obama to use an EO to change the legislative mandates of, for example,
ObamaCare. EOs are meant to clarify and expedite existing legislation,
not re-write the legislative mandates. Mr. Obama is now going through
the same process that all wanna-be state collectivists go through when they
see that the people are rejecting their government programs: bullying,
threatening, and openly waging an all-out war
against the very people he is screwing over, ironically,
in the name of the very people he is
screwing over. In this 2nd Marxist stage of How Dictators Take Over
Nations, Obama is following in the footsteps of Stalin, Lenin, Adolph
Hitler, Mussolini, Mao-Tse-Tung, Fidel Castro, Idi Amin, and Genghis Kahn.
He knows what's right. He knows what should be done. He knows
that if only he could play Total Dictator, dump Congress and dump the
Supreme Court, he could save everybody from all the evils in the world.
But the people and Congress will not cooperate. They refuse to buy
health insurance through ObamaCare. Nor should they because this $680
million government program doesn't work, puts personal information at risk
to hackers, and, most importantly, restricts all individuals' freedoms to
choose their own doctors and health insurance policies. Millions have
lost their health insurance due to ObamaCare. But Obama lies about
ObamaCare's failure. The people, he claims, don't know what's good for
them. Only he knows. And he knows so much about economics, he
thinks, that he can't understand why the dirty rotten people and his
political opponents don't just divvy up all the money in the world, create
work communes, and distribute the wealth equally among everybody.
Well, almost everybody. Not himself or the other Rulers in his
dictatorship. They get more cookies than everybody else because
they're in charge. Obama and his cronies are so brilliant and they
have to manage all the trillions and trillions of market exchanges, buys and
sells at the government-approved "correct" prices in the not-so-free market
so that everything works like the well-oiled-machine that they know Marxist
socialism will create. Uh huh. Right. Screw the consumers.
What do they know? Screw the free market; it's not fair, said Karl
Marx. Obama still believes in the outdated "Labor Theory of Value."
Even socialist economists -- an oxymoron -- don't believe in the "Labor
Theory of Value" any longer, and yet every economic sophism Obama puts forth
rests in part on this false axiom. In the 3rd stage of How to
Implement Socialism, when the communes and redistribution of all the money
in America doesn't work, somebody must be at fault and they will have to
pay. With their lives. First, by loss of freedoms. Then by
incarceration and finally by extermination. The Marxist path is
well-known. Those who still don't understand the ideology that
President Obama is following will soon discover that they have made a grave
mistake. But, unless Obama and his ideas are curbed, it will be too
late. The USSR, the People's Republic of China, Socialist Cuba, and
now Obama's "Fundamentally Changing of America" with "I got a pen and a
phone" to bypass Congress and issue a thousand illegal EOs. Obama's
SOTU speech last night is an open war against the individual, against, the
rule of law, against the US Constitution, and against the concepts embedded
in the inherent rights of man. Last night, President Obama openly
declared war against America, against YOU, and he has told you his game
plan. Wake up, people!
-- Fri Jan 17, 2014 "I've got a pen and I've
got a phone," said President Barack Obama. Remember how FM
Duck told its readers the major steps that most Dictators take on their
Marxist tromp towards implementing state collectivism?
Step One: The would-be Dictator, e.g.,
Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Mao Tse-Tung, and Barack
Obama, for example, reveal how they have solved every problem in the world
by reading Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Step
Two: The would-be Dictator passes legislation or beats people
to death to implement, for example, a national socialist health care system
to save everybody from every sickness in the world.
Step Three: The would-be Dictator's
national health care plan crashes and burns and brings about the exact
opposite of its proposed results. Step Four:
The would-be Dictator claims his national socialist health care system
was/is being undermined by his enemies and everybody else. This is
where the US is currently at in 2014 with President Obama's failed ObamaCare
Step Five: The would-be Dictator issues
proclamations to FORCE his national health care system down everybody's
throats under penalty of incarceration. Referring to the US Congress which Obama considers irrelevant, Obama is now
ready to go around Congress by issuing Executive Orders (his illegal
socialist proclamations) and calling his enforcers on the phone to implement
his dictatorial proclamations. Step Six:
Those who fail to "voluntarily" participate in the would-be Dictator's
national socialist health care system will be fined, taxed, shipped to
re-education camps, and eventually, exterminated for failure to make the
Dictator's national socialist health care system a raging economic success.
It's the people's fault, not the would-be Dictator, he claims. That is
how it always happens and that is how Obama intends on becoming Dictator of
America -- all for "good intentions" of course. Will he succeed?
Tune in for the results of the 2014 and 2016 Elections and find out.
Yahoooooo, it's Adventure Time! "I've got a
pen and I've got a phone!"
-- Tue Jan 14, 2014 Where is the birth
certificate? Among the many records the Obama camp has
refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and
mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack
Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s
repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani
Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school
records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School
records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with
Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state
senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.
Various court cases are winding their way through America's judicial system.
When they will show up, nobody knows. Possibly as early as March 2014.
Possibly others who have knowledge about this issue will get run over by a
MACK truck, fall off a building, or crash in a plane in the ocean. But
one thing is for sure: somebody is hiding something.
Jan 11, 2014 The Obama Administration just fired the computer contractor,
CGI, who blew $680 million of taxpayer money and failed to implement Obama's
Healthcare.gov system. Now, the Barack Hussein Obama Administration is
signing a new contract for $90 million with a new computer contractor to
take over. Why isn't this front page news? Where is the left
Liberal news media? $680 million plus $90 million equals $770 million
plus whatever else it has cost the government to try and implement a
national socialist health care system. Just think, all we really had
to do to implement a reasonably low cost health care system is the same
thing we have done to implement a reasonably low cost iPhone system, or
automobile system, or shoes, or food, or any other free market commodity:
get the government out of the way of the free market and allow everybody to
shop for health insurance anywhere in the world, cut the absurd medical
lawsuits, and laissez-fricken-faire. We all want inexpensive health
care. That's not the issue. The issue is the methodology to
bring it about. The quickest method for the most people with high quality health
care -- just like for every other commodity -- is through free market
capitalism, not via the government. Wake up Obama! Wake up
Liberals! Socialists are those individuals who understand nothing
about money, nothing about economics, nothing about freedom, nothing about
private property rights or... the politicians understand all the above;
they're just plain crooks who make their living by playing the role of
redistribution brokers, redistributing the fruits of YOUR labor. Or,
let's just be nice and say Liberals are naive little 12-year olds whose
educational level regarding money and economics is still at an elementary
level, my dear Watson. Meanwhile, where is Congress in approving this
new $90 million that the Obama Administration is preparing to throw down
another government rat hole?
Jan 11, 2014 Liberal reasoning: assumption, people are inherently too
mean, rotten, stupid, and bad to allow them to live in freedom, i.e., free
market capitalism. Liberal solution: all the inherently mean, rotten,
stupid, and bad people who are incapable of living in freedom go into a
voting booth and vote for other inherently mean, rotten, stupid, and bad
people (by definition, remember) to govern all the inherently mean, rotten,
stupid, and bad people. Wait a minute. Isn't this a
contradiction? How can inherently bad people elect good government?
Are we supposed to believe that inherently bad people morph into saints by
stepping into a voting booth and perform that which they were incapable of
doing in freedom? Is a voting booth some magic contraption? Or
could it be that Liberals are starting out with a false premise, using false
methodology, and, therefore, bringing about a disastrous result:
namely, the creation of the very problem the Liberals presumably set out to
Jan 04, 2014 Was President Barack Obama born in the US and then pretended on
US college applications that he was a foreign student born in Kenya and
attended primary school in Indonesia? Or, was President Obama actually
born in Kenya and grew up in Indonesia? If the former is true, and if
American colleges Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard fell for it, then we can
understand why the powers that be had to hide all of his college paperwork
since they would have revealed that he applied for entrance and financial
aid as a "foreign student," even though he was not. That would
constitute fraud and is a criminal offense. He would immediately be
impeached. If on the other hand, he was actually born in Kenya, then
he does not qualify to be president of the United States and would thus also
qualify to be impeached. Something has to explain why his college
paperwork has been hidden from the public. Whether it's the first
reason or the second reason, he should be impeached. If there is a
third reason, namely, that he was just a regular Joe Doe American born in
Hawaii, then why hide all of his university paperwork? One does not
have to be the famous Belgian detective Hercules Poirot to conclude that
something stinks in Washington DC vis a vis faux president Barack Obama's
Dec 29, 2013 You know your society is doomed:
see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion.
When you see that in order to produce, you
need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing.
When you see that money is flowing to those
who deal, not in goods, but in favors.
When you see that men get richer by graft and
by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but
protect them against you.
When you see corruption being rewarded and
honesty becoming a self-sacrifice. -- Ayn
Dec 27, 2013
How Big is
a Trillion Dollars?
Dec 27, 2013
DC – Whoa, girl friends, gather round, shut up, and pour yourselves
another hot cup of Rocket Java. Have you ever seen a million dollars? How
about a billion dollars?
What does One Trillion dollars look like?
All this talk
about "stimulus packages" and "bailouts"... A billion dollars here...
a hundred billion dollars there... Eight hundred billion
dollars for President Bush’s TARP bailout... Eight hundred billion dollars
for President Obama’s ARRA “stimulus package”… One TRILLION
What does that
with a $100 dollar bill, currently the largest U.S. denomination in general
A packet of one
hundred $100 bills is less than 1/2" thick and contains $10,000. Fits in
your pocket easily and is more than enough for a week or two of shamefully
Believe it or
not, this next little pile is $1 million dollars (100 packets of $10,000).
You could stuff that into a grocery bag and walk around with it.
While a measly
$1 million looked a little unimpressive, $100 million is a little more
respectable. It fits neatly on a standard pallet...
-- Wed Dec 25,
Understanding the US economy in two easy steps:
US Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000 (trillion)
Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000 (trillion)
New debt: $1,650,000,000,000 (trillion)
National debt: $14,271,000,000,000 (trillion)
Recent budget cuts: $38,500,000,000 (billion)
Let's now remove 8 zeros and pretend it's a household
* Annual family income: $21,700
* Money the family spent: $38,200
* New debt on the credit card: $16,500
* Outstanding balance on credit card: $142,710
* Total budget cuts so far: $385
Got it ?
Dec 22, 2013 President Obama has now declared that the Affordable Care Law
passed by Congress is only a set of Suggested Flexible Guidelines that he
can alter at will -- which he did, again, last night for the umpteenth
time. And from where does Obama claim he obtains this newly found
power to alter Congressional laws? Certainly not from Article 2, Sections 1,
2, 3, or 4 which enumerate Executive Branch powers, or from anywhere else in the US Constitution. Obama, last night
before jumping on Air Force One to play golf in Hawaii for the next 17 days
over the Christmas holidays, popped up on national TV and declared
his umpteenth change to Congress's Affordable Care Act: namely, individuals whose health plans were
canceled -- what are we up to now, 6 million people? -- will now
automatically qualify for a “hardship exemption” from the ACA mandate. If they
can’t or don’t sign up for a new plan, they don’t have to pay the penalty tax. They
can also get a special category of ObamaCare insurance designed for people
under age 30. This is 2-3 times higher than people were paying before
losing their existing health care plans that Obama PROMISED (but knew
otherwise) they could keep under the new ACA. Obama's latest
announcement was not a surprise to the insurance companies who thought the
Affordable Care Act was a real law, with mandates that, if violated, are
punishable by law. And, in fact, the insurance companies had to drop
millions of health care policies over the last three years because the Affordable
Care Act mandated that their insurance policies be changed in accordance
with the new law. So, we have at least two big questions: (1)
From where does Obama's Executive Branch obtain the authority to change
Congress's legislative laws, and (2) which is the real Affordable Care Act
law that all Americans must follow or end up being taxed, fined, sued, or
end up in court? Which suggestion or guideline that Obama issues in
regard to his latest alteration of the Affordable Care Act should attorneys
and judges refer to when insurance companies and individuals show up in
court to adjudicate any differences of opinion? What would the Supreme
Court rule upon: the ACA as passed by Congress, or the ACA as changed
day-to-day by President Obama and his Executive Department? By the
way, you know that parking ticket you received last week for parking in the
red zone in front of that fire hydrant in downtown New York? You don't
really have to pay it; it was only a suggested guideline. Welcome to America
where there are no longer any laws, only Suggested Flexible Guidelines.
Dec 17, 2013 Referring to the Obama administration’s executive action to
unilaterally allow younger illegal immigrants brought to the United States
by their parents to be exempt from enforcement laws after Congress rejected
the DREAM Act, Congressman Gowdy said Obama was “substituting” his judgment
for Congress’s. The Big Question is: which other laws can the
president ignore? “If you can turn off
immigration laws, if you can turn off mandatory minimums in our drug
statutes, if you can turn off the so called Affordable Care Act, why not
election laws?” Gowdy said. “Assume that
a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president
require three forms of ID? Can the president require one form of ID? Can he
suspend all requirements that you show ID? And if not, why not. If you can
turn off certain categories of law, do you also not have the power to turn
off all categories of the law?” And this is why many
Americans are so concerned that President Obama will try to declare martial
law, suspend the US Constitution, and demand that he continue to be
President for an unknown further period of time. Why not? This
is exactly what he's doing with Congress's Affordable Care Act and other
pieces of legislation. How far can he go in violating the
Constitution? When will the US Congress take action to curb President
Obama's unconstitutional actions?
Dec 05, 2013 Very few people understand the moral philosophical principles
underlying President Barack Obama's motives for creating and implementing a
nationalized health care system -- the Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare. What are those principles and where did they come from?
First, President Obama believes in altruistic state collectivism, not just
for health care but for every commodity and service in the market. His
dictum is: "from each according to his ability, to each according to
his needs." In other words, all goods and services do not belong
to those who produced them. They belong to the "collective" and should be
distributed by the government, and the basis for that distribution should be
"needs-based." Obama's view: screw the producer, the other half
of the producer-consumer exchange process. In the field of health care, President Obama
consulted the brother of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's previous Chief of Staff and
now Chicago's first Jewish mayor. [Note: now
there's a contradiction in terms: a Muslim Brotherhood's President (Obama)
with a Jewish Chief of Staff. Go figure.] Rahm Emanuel's
brother is Ezekiel Emanuel, a medical doctor at the National Institute of
Health (NIH) and a member of that institution's Bio Ethical Department.
Ezekiel Emanuel and other MD's published many papers such as an article in
Lancet in 2009 regarding how to ethically choose which patients should
receive how much, if any, of which treatment, from flu shots to organ
transplants. The moral philosophical basis for Ezekiel's so-called
bio-ethical choices all rest upon the philosophical foundation of the idea
that people are cogs in a state collective, with the government's function
being the redistribution broker. Which means the function of the
government doctors -- along with bureaucrats -- is to ration medical
services and commodities to the members of society as per their "usefulness"
to the state collective. Contrast that ideology to: individual rights
to freely exchange, private property, and free market capitalism. In
the latter, goods and commodities are not rationed; voluntary market forces
bring supply to demand. And then prices drop. In a socialist
system, there are no free market prices to even determine if there is a
market shortage in one of the many millions of related services or
commodities that result in finished products. Bureaucrats set fake
prices using Sears Mail Order Catalogues, as they did in the USSR. So,
right off the bat, President Obama followed the ridiculous advice of a group
of so-called bio-ethical medical doctors at the NIH who not only hold
metaphysical, epistemological, and moral philosophical views of state
collectivism -- i.e. socialism -- they co-authored papers in the medical
journal Lancet that not only discusses how to ration medical care but also
show charts for what former Alaskan Gov Sarah Palin called "Death Panels."
Ezekiel Emanuel's charts were called "Reaper Charts." Why?
Because they showed the age groups -- such as before age 15 and above age 60
-- that various types of medical care should be withheld based upon various
criteria such as the individual's usefulness to the state collective. The
Big Question is: determined by whom?
You may not have heard about Ezekiel Emanuel's "The Complete Lives System."
It's the intellectual underpinning for Obama's Affordable Care Act, and it's
frightening. You can Google Ezekiel's articles for bio-ethics in
Lancet Medical Journals. Now let that morality sink into your brain
for a minute and you will start realizing what President Barack Obama and
his left Liberal administration is trying to shove down your throats with
Obamacare. Gov Palin had it correct: Obamacare is the moral
philosophical concretization of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel's state collectivist
ideology and that ideology's driving force for government rationing of
health care ultimately rests upon their "bio-ethical" premises underlying
their "Reaper Charts" -- or "Death Panels." This is the same ideology
that led to -- not at first, but the ultimate logical conclusion -- of
Adolph Hitler's national health care system that ended in The Holocaust as
it's final solution. Classes of individuals were declared "unfit" or
"not useful" for the political leaders' state collectivist regime. So
they, as a class of people, like America's class of youth under age 15 or
over age 60 in Ezekiel Emanuel's moral philosophy, are targets for
elimination under the 2,700 pages of Obamacare legislation -- plus 20,000
pages, so far, of IRS and other bureaucratic rules. Obamacare --
ridiculously called the Patient's Protection and Affordable Care Act -- is
one of the most evil and pernicious pieces of moral philosophy ever proposed
by an American President. Plain and simple, it is simply another form
of genocide couched in Hollywood marketing of the worse kind. For
doctors, Obamacare is blatantly against their Hippocratic Oath to save and
protect all life. Obama's current marketing campaign for the next 20
days before Christmas in 2013 is to try to gain the sanction of his and
Ezekiel Emanuel's victims, which is you. Your job is to vote in the
Elections of 2014 and dump all those politicians -- both Liberals and RINOs
-- who support Obamacare. It's worth your life.
Dec 03, 2013 Called "Evangelii Gaudium" (The Joy of the Gospel), Pope
Francis blamed the existence of money, free market capitalism, and -- by
implication -- the entire moral philosophy upon which rests the ideology of
individual rights, private property rights, and the foundation of a limited
republic as the CAUSE of poverty throughout the world.
Really? What a dope the Pope is. There are so many misconceptions and untruths underlying Pope Francis'
assumptions and thus erroneous conclusions that one wonders where to start to
refute them. Let's just hit the basic basics of economics and free
market philosophy. First, money per se is not bad. Money is
simply a medium of economic exchange, taking the place of direct barter
until said commodities/services can be exchanged later. Nobody intends
to eat gold money -- or a paper receipt for it -- or build a house out of
it. What Pope Francis is
erroneously referring to as the result of money and capitalism is actually
the result of fiat currency and the market being manipulated by the state
collectivists (fascists, communists, socialists, dictators) who have gotten
control of our paper and credit money supply, namely the Federal Reserve and
all other national central banks in the world. But these monetary manipulators are not free
market capitalists and their manipulated money is not backed by anything.
They are counterfeiters. Pope Francis -- like most people -- does not
understand what money is and what constitutes the foundational ideas of free
market economics. So he erroneously believes the propaganda spewed out
daily by government news media and thus blames the wrong group and for the
wrong reasons. In short, the Pope is rather ignorant about basic
social-political-economics. It is government intervention into the
free market, going off the gold and silver standard for money, and the
philosophy of Karl Marx -- from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs -- that has brought poverty to a large portion of
the world. Prices of products under true capitalism tend toward zero
as capital is accumulated; "prices" under socialism tend toward infinity --
i.e. absence of goods on the shelves -- as there are no real "prices" under
socialism, only government mandated math values stuck up on items or issued
with ration cards. Does capitalism get rid of all crooks? Of
course not. But that's the only reason for government: to
protect and adjudicate law breakers. Does socialism get rid of crooks?
Absolutely not, and, in fact, it routes the most vicious clever crooks
directly into positions of government power where they are then in charge of
making up the laws to protect their criminal actions. Capitalism
produces the highest quality of life for the most people than any other
arrangement because it is founded upon principles of individual rights and
responsibilities. Socialism is founded upon dog-eat-dog vicious
politics. Pope Francis, in attacking free market capitalism and not
defining what money really is, does himself and his global congregation a
huge disservice by drawing wrong conclusions from wrong foundational
assumptions. His ideas are not defending the poor; his ideas are
sending them into the very poverty he is complaining about. Note that
Pope Francis and President Obama have come to the same fallacious economic
conclusions... based upon the same fallacious economic sophisms. And
hence the birth of Liberals in the US and their continued fallacious
education -- from Kindergarten through University grad school -- in the Marxist philosophy of altruistic
Nov 28, 2013 US Dictator-President Barack Obama has just broken the law
again. Now what? The Affordable -- Ha Ha Affordable -- Health Care Law
mandates that small businesses must start participating in ObamaCare next
week. This is the law. It is not just a guideline passed by
Congress. It is the law, just like all the other laws passed by
Congress and subject to judicial and statutory regulations. But now,
as of yesterday, Dictator-President Barack Obama has just declared that
small businesses do not have to start enrolling their employees into the
Affordable Ha Ha Affordable Health Care system until Nov 15, 2014, two weeks
after the 2014 Elections for Congress. What a coincidence. And
what a law-breaking action this is. No president or US Congressman
or judge can just pop up one morning and declare that certain sections or
clauses of a US law can be arbitrarily changed. This can only be done
by Congress by going through its legislative procedures as outlined in the
US Constitution. That is why we have checks and balances between the
three branches of government: to prevent the dictatorial actions
that Obama has just taken. US Dictator-President Barack Obama is now
embarking upon dangerously litigious territory: unconstitutionally
declaring changes in various laws, specifically his ACA Obamacare Law.
The Big Question: will the US Congress just sit on their thumbs and
pretend that US Dictator-President Barack Obama can rewrite their
legislation any ol' time he feels like it? Or will somebody in
Congress finally grow a pair of cajones and call the President's on his
illegal action? By the way, some additional 50 - 100 million people
may well lose their current health care insurance as ObamaCare kicks in and
employers figure out that it's cheaper to not cover their employees through
the ACA. Ceteris paribus, if nothing else changes, all private
insurance companies will soon go out of business and the Obama thugs will
have obtained their single payer government system -- a national socialist
health care system -- which was their goal in the first place. Anybody
who didn't see this coming is blind as a bat. Like, who is John Galt?
Nov 22, 2013 Here's the Big Question of The Day: Did the Obama
Administration cleverly and knowingly orchestrate the failure of Obamacare's
roll out on purpose or are they simply as incompetent as they appear?
First, let's trek down Logic Path A that assumes Obamacare was, and is,
being engineered to fail at all levels in order to reach the goal of a
single payer government system: nationalized health care. (1) Obamacare is passed by Congress
with 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook that nobody has fully read or
understands. (2) US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts --
either acting under threats from the Obama Administration or delusions of
what constitutes "Constitutionality" -- introduces the term "tax" into the
Obamacare Bill in order to get around the term "fee," so he can rule (5-4)
that "taxes" are constitutional, and thus Obamacare is "constitutional."
This was necessary for the next steps. (3) The Obama Admin knowingly
rolls out a flawed and incomplete Healthcare.gov Web Site for people to try
to sign up for Obamacare. 5.5 million people lose their current
insurance and doctors, receive notices that double/triple or quadruple the
cost of a new insurance policy and/or deductibles, but cannot sign up on the
Healthcare Web Site because it's broken and the payment software programs have not
even been written yet. Which means nobody can or could have signed up. (4) President Obama pops up on national TV and
illegally pulls a new change to the Obamacare Law out of his ass and
declares that everybody can keep their previous insurance that the
Affordable Health Care Act "legally" says they can't. All of a sudden,
nobody knows what the real law is: the one Congress passed and the
President signed off on, or the latest change that Obama ad-libbed in a
rambling diatribe on national TV? Which direction do you go? Can
you, or a company, be sued if you, or a company, choose one direction or the other? Can the
government be sued? (5) Now that Obama has purposely dumped 5.5
million people off their current insurance policies, he and Valerie Jarrett
will next watch as 50 - 100 million employees lose their insurance polices
when employers discover that the costs are prohibitive and dump their
insurance coverage for employees. (6) Now, as planned, 150
million or more individuals have either no insurance, or have extremely high
insurance costs, or have now qualified for Medicare, Medicare that is now an
unfunded liability to the tune of $90 trillion or more dollars. (7)
Now that the entire health care system of the US has been completely wiped
out, the Obama Administration can finally blame the insurance companies, the
youth of America who chose to pay a fine rather than sign up to subsidize
everybody else's health care costs, and your grandmother's dog's left ear. (8)
Oh, what to do, what to do... "Oh, I know," says Obama. "We
simply have to morph the Obamacare system into a single payer, national
socialist government health care system. You know, the type of system
that we originally planned for and have arrived at by pretending to
implement a fake market-based health care system. Yahoo, thank you, my
dear little victims!" Welcome to Hell. Or let's take a quick
gander at the Logic for Path B, entitled, We Are Seriously Trying to
Implement Good Health Care But We Are Just a Bunch of Incompetents.
(1) Obama and the socialist Democrats pass Obamacare, not knowing
what's in the 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook. (2) The IRS and HHS
add thousands more pages of contradictory rules. (3) The US Supreme
Court says Obamacare is "constitutional." See Chief Justice
John Roberts actions above. (4) The Obama Admin hires a
bunch of computer incompetents to write the software code and implement a totally
botched up Healthcare.gov Web Site that cost $680 million, 5 times or more
over budget, and the payment routines have not even been written. (5)
Obama shows up on national TV and lies again about virtually everything he
can think of. (6) The incompetent people rolling out Obamacare,
both at the techie computer level and the personal contract level, continue
stumbling along seriously trying to make everything work. Ha Ha,
seriously? (7) Obama's ratings fall lower than whale shit at the
bottom of the Pacific Ocean but he
and his cohorts continue to push Obamacare down Americans' throats in a "ha
ha serious" attempt to save everybody's health care. (8) The
system continues to blow up as more and more people lose their health care
insurance and the Obama Administration hopes and prays they win the 2014
Elections and the 2016 Elections to keep Obamacare floating all the way to
Hell and back. So which Path, national socialist A or faux serious B, do you think the Obama
Administration is traveling? Are they crafty little socialists who
have planned the crash and burn of the current health care system AND the
Affordable Care Act ON PURPOSE, or are they simply a bunch of dummies
stumbling down the path to Nowheresville because they still haven't figured
out that socialism doesn't work? My guess is that Obama is traveling
down Path A: Screwing it up on purpose to arrive at a national
socialist health care joke, plus traveling down Path B, namely they are
Seriously a Bunch of Dummies in the first place for trying to choose any
other path than free market capitalism.
Nov 18, 2013 Whoa, pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup
of Rocket Java, shut up, and listen up, girl friends. Did the United
States of America just morph from a limited republic to a dictatorship
overnight? President Obama -- a month after his ridiculous heath care
Web Site rolled out and crashed over the cliff, causing 6 million people to
lose their current health care coverage -- strolled out in front of national
TV and said, "Oh $hee-it, man, I'm so sorry for lying to you that y'all
could actually keep your original health insurance policies and doctors.
Dang, and weren't you a bunch of fools to believe my crack-snorting little
ass, but ya-yesss, I take full blame -- cough-cough, make that full credit
-- for fumbling your health care lives on my own 1 yard line -- 'cause
that's about how far my program got (99 yards to go) before it blew sky high
on Oct 1, 2013. And now I promise, again, ha ha, fool you twice, that
the football game ain't over, that I will pick up this $684 million
over-budget football and run toward the 2 yard line before I fumble the ball
again because this game -- and I do mean "game" -- ain't over yet.
Ya-yesss, boys and girls, my little subordinate victims, I am now declaring
that I can just step up onto the national stage and claim that I have the
constitutional authority to change any law I desire and thus undo those
portions of Congress' Affordable Care Act that I think may be inconvenient
in my Obamacare Mess, for which I take full responsibility even though
it's not my fault. Double speak, double speak. Soooo, cough-cough, and I'm not standing here naked
as a Jay bird, y'all don't have to follow the original Obamacare law passed
by Congress. Follow whatever I last say on TV. There will be no
lawsuits, I promise. Ha ha, you dumb $hits. You don't have to
give up your health care policies for a whole year 'cause, well, because I
said so. And I'm above the law. Which law? All the laws.
Never mind that the original law -- which I just dumped with HARDLY ANY
OBJECTIONS FROM 535 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS -- says you got until Jan 1, 2014, to
comply. Forget about that law. I just declared a new law.
And, if I feel like it, I will override the new law tomorrow, and then that
next day, and then the following day until Hell freezes over. Whatever
I feel like because I am the CEO of America. And we are the Borg.
We all live in one big commune.
Congress, the US Constitution and all of our current laws are now irrelevant
until I say so in one of my Executive Orders. Left, right, left,
right... In fact, I am changing the freeway speeds in all 50
states from 65 MPH to 13 1/2 MPH as of, let's say, uh, midnight tonight, OK?
Why? To save the Borg's fuel costs and cut down on CO2 emissions on
Saturdays while we're driving to our nation's fantasy football games.
US laws are now only, well, you know, like, Temporary Guidelines. We
now have only one branch of government: the Executive Department,
better known as ME, Barack Obama." Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for
Nov 12, 2013 Howdy Idahoinians: a whopping 100 Idahoans have signed up
for Gov Butch "The RINO" Otter's state healthcare exchange. Way to go,
Butch. We tried to tell you it was a bust and you tried to claim you
were a Libertarian. What a joke. 6 million Americans have lost
their health care insurance all across the US within the last month and a
half. Less than 50,000 of the anticipated 500,000 that were expected
by the Obama administration to have signed up by now have either paid for
Obamacare insurance or left their shopping carts on healthcare.gov without
signing up. 7 million Americans are necessary to sign up to even fund
Obamacare, which looks like it ain't gonna happen, folks. At the
current rate of signing up for O-Care, it might take a few hundred years to
get rolling. Like hello, we'll all be dead by then. Healthcare.gov
Nov 11, 2013 Think about this: The IRS, the taxing agency that has
been chosen to monitor, implement and enforce our nation's new national
socialist health care system with 16,000 new IRS agents, has sent over 650
income tax refunds to the same address. This means that the
programming in the IRS computer system is just as bad or worse than the
computer system underlying Obamacare. How difficult is it for the IRS
programmers to write the following simple routine: (1) sort all the
IRS refund checks by address, and (2) if the current address equals the last
address, flag this data item. I mean, come on, this is simple Computer
For Idiots 101A and the IRS has not implemented this type of error checking
in its refund program? So now we have to ask the question: What
sort of error checking has been implemented in the botched up Obamacare
system? None? This system has cost the taxpayers $680 million,
with an original budget estimated at $80 million. If any private
company had received an initial estimate of $80 million to create a computer system
and the cost approached double, $160 million, the project would have come to
a complete halt and heads would have rolled. So what happened when the
cost of Obamacare passed double and approached triple? Nothing.
How about quadruple, $320 million? Nothing. How about quintuple,
$400 million? Nothing. How about adding in the fact that the
system would not be completed on time? Nothing. And the "project
manager" and HHS Secretary Sebelius are still busy trying to "fix" whatever
is wrong with their ridiculously overrun Obamacare project while Congress
sits on their thumbs and says, "Oh well." President Obama pretends
everything is on schedule and it will be a great system. Millions of
citizens have already lost their current health care coverage and Obama says
their health care policies were substandard and they will get better coverage under Obamacare --
if they can ever log on to sign up. But this train wreck is just the tip of the
ice berg. Look at the IRS system, sending $4 billion to duplicate
addresses. This is the type of error checking you can expect to
find in whatever the future Obamacare system ends up as, too. And the IRS, who can't
even clean up their own system, is in charge of the Obamacare system?
Just think, all we really needed to do was to dump the current health care
system that the government implemented over the last 50 years, go back to
the free market, and start over. The free market is not the cause of
our previous lousy health care system; but it IS the solution. Same
for the USPS, Amtrak, and all the other government bureaucracies that have
intervened into the free market. Once again, health care is not a
right. No commodities or services are rights. Health care is a
marketable commodity and if the government would get out of the way, prices
would plummet, just like for all other commodities in an open market. Obamacare doesn't need more time; it needs to be abolished.
Nov 02, 2013 Newsflash to all Left Liberals: before Obamacare, the
health care system operating in the US was NOT a free market system.
It was -- and has been for the last 50 years -- operating, technically
speaking, in a quasi fascist economic system. Fascism is defined as
the state issuing government rules to control the means of production.
Socialism is defined as the state taking over and actually trying to run the
means of production. So, Obamacare is not replacing a previous free
market health care system. Obamacare is replacing a previous fascist health
care system which -- since President Lyndon Johnson intervened with his
Great Society -- has been screwing up America's health care with all its
governmental interventions for the last 50 years. Obamacare is simply
another variation, an extension, on our previous state collectivism. And it, too,
will fail for all the same basic economic reasons that its predecessor was
failing. Obamacare, stripping away the veil of the government acting
as the robbery broker, is nothing more than one group of individuals stating
that they have the right to demand that doctors and health care
professionals must provide them with health care. In other words, the
rights of doctors are supposedly subservient to others who are demanding
that doctors owe them their health care services as a natural right.
But this defines a master-slave relationship, American citizens being cast
as the masters and doctors cast as the slaves. In a free market
system, American citizens and doctors would be voluntarily exercising their
rights to choose which health care services they want to exchange. In
a free market system, nobody has a right to demand that another person must
be his/her economic slave and thus must provide their services or products
as a so-called right. Medical care is, therefore, not a right.
It is simply an exchangeable service or commodity in the free market.
This is true for all services and commodities in the market, including
education, cars, food, computers, etc. Nobody's services should be
somebody else's demand to receive as a right. Otherwise, we are simply
establishing a culture of slavery. Rights are not exchangeable
commodities. Rights are individual freedoms, not commodities and services.
Freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, association, etc. are not
bought and sold commodities in a free market. And this is where
Liberals get very confused. They first distance themselves from their
robberies by using the government as their robbery brokers and then claim
that they have a right to other people's commodities and services.
Thus, they create government robbery programs and give them fancy names such
as The Great Society, Social Security, Medicare, The Affordable Care Act,
and so on, as if it's not a robbery if they use the government to perform
the robbery for them. And the more people who commit the robbery, the
less of a robbery it becomes? The real irony is how the victims in this great
government robbery scheme often fail to reason what is really going on and
begin calling for the very robbery that robs them in their own profession.
Teachers and doctors do this all the time, and then wonder why their
profession starts crumbling into total disarray as the government performs
its robbery duties. Hence we get monstrosities such as Leave No Child
Behind, Race To The Top, and Obamacare. The predictable end result:
civil war and The Holocaust, since, in reality, reciprocal rip-off rights
can never be implemented and somebody must be blamed. Remember,
Obamacare is not about health care; it is about individual rights vs.
coerced state collectivism.
Oct 30, 2013 Lying through his teeth, President Barack Obama claimed over
two dozen times, "If you like your current health care plan and doctor, I
guarantee that you will be able to keep them under Obamacare." Lied?
Yes, lied, because he already knew damn well, as far back as 2010, that some
60% to 70% of individuals would not only lose their individual health
care plans but that the cost of new health care plans would greatly
increase. This was no accident. The President and his advisors
have planned this canard for the last 4 years and were advised by both
health care professionals and the IRS that individual costs would skyrocket.
While the President claimed that everybody's existing plan would be
"grandfathered in," and that everybody could keep their existing plan, HHS
AND the IRS issued rulings that CHANGED the definition of "grandfathered in"
so that if insurance companies did anything such as change a premium or
merged with another company or fed a Doggie Bon Bon to their dog, then the
"grandfathered in" definition does not apply. Hence the
Obama Administration knew from the
outset that virtually nobody in this category (14 million individuals) would
be able to keep their existing plans, and thus begets the Big Lie. Why
did Obama and his handler Ms. Valerie Jarrett lie? Because their REAL
GOAL is for Obamacare to fail so that they can move the United States
onto a government-run national socialist health care system. And
that's why this entire health care debacle is so troubling: namely,
those in charge have known all along that their ultimate goal was to move us
onto a nationalized health care system, which is tantamount to
institutionalizing fascism for at least one-sixth of the American economy.
Once again, as we listen to the Obamacare congressional health care
hearings, we must remember that the real issue is individual rights, not the
cost of the system or when will errors be corrected or any other empirical
parameters. That's like arguing during the Third Reich in Germany in
the 1930s about the parameters and problems in shipping Jews off to
re-education camps rather than the question of individual rights of Jews
being shipped off to anywhere. Who cares about the problems and
parameters of a government program that is violating individual rights when
it is the moral philosophy of the violation of individual rights that should
be of major concern? Let's face it, if the government can violate one
of your rights to implement a program, then we have established the
precedent for the government to violate ALL the rights of everybody to
In other words, once the Republicans on the health care committee accept the
premise that it is OK to violate the individual's right to choose in an
economic exchange process, then they have lost the debate. Accept a
false premise, and you have already lost the argument. That's --
unfortunately -- where we are today: not arguing about individual
rights but rather how best to violate said rights. What trait for the
commodity we call health care exempts it from all the basic laws of free
market economics? Does free market economics really fall apart
depending upon the specific commodity or service being exchanged? Really?
If so, then perhaps the laws of physics changes in different galaxies, too.
Wow, what a discovery: no universal rights for humans and no universal laws
Oct 27, 2013 Well, well, well. Looks like the Tea Party and other
Libertarian groups can now say, "I told you so!" The roll out of Obamacare on its online
Web Site, healthcare.gov, has been a total disaster. Millions
have tried to log on. Only a few thousand -- or less in many states -- have succeeded in
traversing the computer obstacles to obtain some
kind of health insurance, mostly at a higher cost that their previous
insurance. Policies cost a lot more than
citizens expected. No, Obama, citizens did not get to keep their
current insurance. Obama lied. And if you don't obtain health insurance by next
March or whenever the Affordable Health Care law mandates, you will be
"TAXED" not fined by the IRS. The difference between a
"fine" and a "tax" being the distinction by which Chief Justice of the US
Supreme Court, John Roberts, ruled that Obamacare was constitutional
because taxation (not a fine) is legal. What a stretch that was: Justice Roberts had to first introduce the term "tax" into the
Obamacare law in order to then rule that a "fine" could morph into a "tax." Now that
Obamacare has rolled out -- and over the cliff into nowheresville -- we have the televised spectacle
of a Congressional committee trying to find out what went wrong. Why
is healthcare.gov bombing out all over the place? Why did it cost $684
million, 5-6 times more than originally estimated? All the project vendors
working on this Healthcare Titanic are simply pointing
fingers at each other or CMS -- the government entity responsible for
implementing the ACA under HHS Secretary Sebelius who didn't bother to show
up to this important Congressional meeting. Meanwhile, President Obama is busy
giving a news conference in the Pink Room of the While House, blabbering
about how badly the US needs to grant amnesty to 20 million illegal Mexicans
who he expects to vote for the Democrats in the future. What does he care about the total
train wreck of Obamacare? He's busy buying future left Liberal votes.
Back to the congressional hearing on why Obama's healthcare.gov Web Site is
a total failure, the excuses coughed up by the computer project vendors who
failed -- along with CMS and HHS -- are a real hoot. It is obvious
that there was NO project management whatsoever. The project is five
times over budget. Over $600 million dollars for an initially
estimated $90 million computer project. When asked why didn't the lead
computer company inform CMS whether the project would bomb or not, a Ms.
Campbell (in charge of CGI Federal) responded with, "It wasn't our
responsibility to advise CMS whether the system should be a go or no-go."
Errrt, screech, halt! Are you kidding? It is exactly the project
vendor's prime responsibility to inform the client -- CMS and HHS -- about
whether the project should be implemented or not. In fact, this should
have been done long before the budget doubled, tripled, quadrupled, and
quintupled. Ms. Campbell is a total
incompetent. So is CMS, and Sec of HHS Sebelius, and President Obama
for not asking a simple question: namely, hey guys, where are we on
the healthcare.gov project? And it wasn't the prime vendor's
responsibility to provide status reports? Or Sec of HHS Sebelius'
responsibility to demand status reports?
Wow, see how wonderful state collectivism works? And if you don't sign
up soon on this broken Obamacare Health Care system, the
IRS will come knocking on your door and FINE -- oops, I mean TAX -- your ass.
Ironically, Obama and RINO politicians such as Sen. John McCain have asked
private enterprise from Silicon Valley to show up to solve healthcare.gov's computer
problems. You know, the private sector that the government says is why
they had to transfer our nation's health care system to the government in
the first place. Because the free market and private enterprise are
pig pirate capitalists, right? Now it's "help, help, help us fix our Health Care
Train Wreck!" What a contradiction.
But here's the real problem:
Obamacare is an individual rights issue, not an argument about empirical
data results. Obamacare is a violation of your individual right to
choose which services or commodities you want to trade or exchange or
purchase in a free and open market. This issue is not about how much
Obamacare costs or whether it was implemented on time or what the parameters
of the online system will be. And now we have the spectacle of
Republican and Democrat politicians screaming at each other on nationalized
TV about the empirical results of the online system while virtually NOBODY
is zeroing in on the real issue: namely, Obamacare must be abolished
not because the rollout of healthcare.gov doesn't work, but because it is a violation of your
individual rights. Note: Obamacare is not "settled law."
It is what is called "pretended law." Pretended law remains in force
until it is challenged and overturned by -- in this case -- another Supreme
Court judgment or via the US Congress or via the people. There are
various constitutional appeals winding their way through the court system
today that could easily overturn Obamacare, one of which is that the "fee"
clause which Justice Roberts relied upon to redefine as a "tax" did not
originate in the US House. It originated in the US Senate. This
is a violation of the Constitution's Origination Clause, which
rightfully belongs to the US House, not the US Senate. The Origination
Clause states that fees, including taxes, must originate in the House, not
the Senate. The US Supreme
Court could overturn ALL of Obamacare on this one issue alone. Let's
hope this happens.
Aug 29, 2013 So here's the Big Question, and I'm directing this to those who
are following around (like little puppy dogs) our off-planet friends (the Plejaren) living on Erra in another dimension that is a fraction of a second
off from our own vibrational time frame. Those who don't know what I'm
referring to can log onto www.figu.org and
catch up to the fact that we are not alone in the Milky Way Galaxy, much
less the entire universe. Look it up; I don't have the time and space
-- no pun intended -- to educate you here or now about this subject. Anyway, the Big
Question is: who is worse, a president such as George Bush who knowingly
lies to us and pulls off a lot of stunts for his military industrial complex
and banking buddies to further enrich themselves OR a naive president WITH
SUPPOSEDLY "GOOD INTENTIONS" who stupidly leads us down an economic path of
total altruistic state collectivism -- let's just call it socialism -- that
must inexorably end up in economic destruction and World War III?
Neither is good but the point is: "good intentions" by ignoramus
presidents is not better than "bad intentions" by bad presidents.
They're the same: bad. The
real problem that I have noticed from the Plejaren and Billy Meier and their
lock-step followers is that NONE of them in this intellectual camp
understand the basics of simple economics and thus think that just because
somebody has "good intentions," they are OK guys and will become a suitable
president. Nothing could be further from the truth. Any
leader who is an idiot is exactly that: an idiot. And he will lead you over the
cliff just as surely as a smart bad buy will. This brings up a very interesting
phenomenon: ET humans -- of which there are some estimated 7.5 million
different races in the Milky Way Galaxy alone, according to the Plejaren -- have
not evolved equally in every area of intellectual endeavor such as physics,
chem, bio, and especially economics so that they have these areas fully and
equally integrated into their intelligence. By "equal" I do not mean
individuals, I mean "equal" areas of intellectual endeavor. Thus, one
ends up with ET humans who can jump to hyper light speed, traverse what we
call "time" whether it's a "dimension" or not, but don't understand how
basic economics works. Thus they do not comprehend the difference --
and its ultimate economic effects -- caused by, for example, using fiat currency vs. hard
commodity money. They do not understand how prices -- which are simply
qualitative subjective value judgments by individuals -- can only be formed in a free
market and once that market is destroyed, say by central bankers
counterfeiting the money supply, the economy must necessarily go into
self-destruct mode. Why don't the ET Plejaren understand this?
After all, they are some 18,000 years ahead of us in physics, medicine,
etc.? Look at it this way. Like us, they are living in a culture
that took a long time to build up and the current Plejaren did not invent
their past discoveries any more than our current Earth humans invented the
internal combustion engine, light bulbs or computers. Yes, the people
on Earth today know how to drive a car, use a cell phone, and take
antibiotics but they did not invent them. Similarly, most Plejaren
today, like most Earth humans, have no clue about how economics really
works. THEREFORE, -- and this is a big THEREFORE -- the Plejaren make
the mistake that all you have to do is WANT to make the economy "prosperous"
and it will happen. That's why in the 1930's and 40's the Plejaren
mistakenly gave (via telepathic vibrations) the plans to build beam ships to scientists in
Germany's Third Reich and then had to cancel those plans and beam ships when they
discovered that the Nazis weren't the "good guys" they thought they were.
Amazingly, the Plejaren were not aware that national socialism must
inexorably lead to the Holocaust and the economic destruction that it did.
Thus, today, the Plejaren continue to make the same mistake and for the same
basic reason. They think that US president Barack Obama's "good
intentions" are all that it takes to lead America and the world out of its
current Recession/Depression. If they understood anything about basic
Austrian free market economics, they would not come to that conclusion.
Similarly, if I could transport 10,000 Egyptian children from 5,000 years
ago and raise them in today's US economy, they would all learn how to use
iPhones, drive a car, and turn on the TV. But that does not mean they
understand how these inventions work and they would not necessarily be the
ones who invent anything new. Same for the Plejaren. They are
living off previously invented technology and very few of them, if any,
especially hard physical scientists, understand anything about praxeology
(human action) which is the subject of free market economics.
Conclusion: thanks to the Plejaren for all the physics and time travel info and saving
the planet Earth from other ET "invaders" in the past -- which
they claim and I believe them -- but I caution you all
from Erra to please bone up on the basic laws of econ. Those who just
live and breathe every word from the contact notes of the Plejaren should learn to question
intellectual issues using your own brain and stop just re-hashing what you
heard or think you heard from our ET friends. Do I question the Plejaren's existence? No. Do I question how fast they can travel
through the universe? No. Do I question how they farm their
agriculture or build
beam ships? No. Do I question their knowledge in every area of
endeavor? Yes. Especially basic economics. And that's the
name of that tune. They claim that they support Obama and that he is
one of the best presidents the US has ever had -- or at least that's what
some Earth humans have translated from the Plejaren. Obama may have "good intentions." But,
as we have stated above, that is not the issue. The road to hell is
paved with good intentions. We are concerned with rational results
from rational intentions. Obama is obviously an
ignoramus -- especially in economics -- whose strings are being pulled by
other ignoramuses. The road to Hell is paved
with "good intentions," and that's exactly where Obama and his
"handlers" are leading us: straight to economic Hell and thus to WW III.
Good thing the Plejaren are forbidden by the Galaxy's High Council to not
overly "influence" the direction that Earth humans are going; otherwise,
they might think it would be great to implement a world state collectivist
government on planet Earth. Then again, we could do with more
intellectual "influences" from the Plejaren regarding free market capitalism
as a basis for more rational social-political-economics. Unless of
course, we are supposed to go through Hell in order to get to "Heaven" --
rational thought, not a location in Earth major religions -- and Obama is
just playing his part? The Plejaren may be 18,000 years ahead of us in
technology but they appear to be about 200 years behind us -- at least
Libertarians -- in economics.
Aug 11, 2013 Entrepreneur Donald Trump said it best:
"Let me get this straight:
We're going to be "gifted"
with a health care plan we areforced to
purchaseand finedif we don't,
which purportedly covers at least ten million more people,
without addinga single new doctor,
but provides for16,000 new IRS agents,
written by a committee whose chairmansays hedoesn't understand it,
passedby a Congressthat didn't readit but exemptedthemselves from
it, and signed by a President whosmokes,
a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes,
for which we'll betaxed for four
years before any benefits take effect,
by a government which hasalready
bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,
all to be overseen by a surgeon generalwho isobese,
and financedby a country
May 26, 2013 Perhaps we are lucky that Barack Obama was elected in both
2008 and 2012 as President of the United States. That way, we got beat
over the head with the left Liberal ideology of altruistic state
collectivism early on, in one big whopping fell swoop. We are now experiencing
first hand -- in fast motion, fast and furious motion -- how economies
evolve from a half-ass free market (mixed economy) directly to national
socialism. Not since the 1930s have we have such an opportunity. ObamaCare with the IRS running our national socialist
health care program is about as Hitlerian Brown Shirt as you can get.
Just think, if we had elected a Republican In Name Only (RINO) -- such as
Mitt Romney -- or your standard Hillary Clinton
type of left Liberal, they would have fed us their poisonous Marxist ideology
piece meal, very slowly, so we would have never noticed how we were evolving
from a free market to a whoop-tee-doo, gung ho, full-fledged military
dictatorship with Der Fuhrer, Barack Obama, at the top dispensing favors, cookies, money,
and crackerjacks to his/her friends and government accomplices. This
is exactly what is going on with both the RINOs and President Barack Obama
today, only at breakneck speed. The major root of all evil in the economy today
is the destruction of all of our values as our money has been destroyed because that is what money really
is, in reality, an exchange of values. Money is not paper. Money is not even gold.
Money is a medium of economic exchange, an exchange of prioritized values
between individuals. And when that value system between free
individuals is taken over and counterfeited into fake values by either a government or a
group of bankers sanctioned to perform theft by a government, then that is
the end of your society, your culture, your economy. The slow
transition of switching our money from gold and silver, to paper, to
plastic, and then to simply numbers created out of nowhere on a big
mainframe computer in the bowels of the Federal Reserve central banks is, in
actuality, the slow transition of dumping our society's values and replacing
them with lies, lies, and then more lies. Hence, we have inflated Federal
Reserve Notes, wrecking the free market process of price creation in the
market, lying to the citizens about the stored values of their money in a
bank, or a Certificate of Deposit, or an annuity, interest rates, or even the value of
gold stock which the central bankers are currently manipulating on a daily
basis in the commodities market. This process of destroying all of our values in the economy,
both financially and morally, was
greatly sped up with the election of President Barack Obama as he has
doubled our national debt from $10 trillion to $17 trillion in 4 short
years and is trying to force the IRS between you and your doctor. Not understanding what money really is or how it represents a
moral value system, Obama is on such a rapid path of economic destruction -- and
thus total value destruction -- that it is now becoming quite obvious to
even the most liberal of the Liberals in this nation. They are now
concerned; they are running for cover from Obama and his immoral culture of
corruption. If this fast
forward to national socialism helps us to understand sooner and
more clearly how bad it would be living under that type of regime and thus helps us to not go
in that direction, then that is all for the good. So maybe we should
be thanking President Barack Obama for enlightening us much earlier than we
otherwise would have been about the Laws of Cause and Effect -- although
not intentionally on his part. One wonders that if Obama's Perfect
Storm of (1) his Benghazi Incident of getting our Ambassador murdered while
trying to cover up his international gun running to Al Qaeda, (2) his use of
the IRS to deny tax exempt status to Conservative and Tea Party groups, and
(3) his use of the Justice Department to spy upon and rip off AP
journalists' personal communications, if that tri-fective screwing over of
our moral values does not wake up Americans about how socialism evolves in an
economy, then nothing will. So, thank you Mr. President, for the fast
track lesson in How To Get To National Socialism Faster Than Hell. We
know you meant well, but the road to Hell is paved with good but stupid
intentions. Presidents and central bankers rarely see or care about
the disastrous results of their policies, the inflation, the unemployment,
and the wars. And even if they do, it's always somebody else's fault.
Now it's time for an impeachment. You, Mr. President, your
impeachment. For all the high crimes, felonies, and misdemeanors
you've committed against the citizens of the United States. Time to
get back to individual rights, freedom to voluntarily exchange, and a real
May 23, 2013 IRS Tax Exemption Director, Lois Lerner, planned to take the
Fifth Amendment when called to testify before the US Congress yesterday.
So she took the stand and immediately issued a statement saying she was a
good little girl, never took the candy from the cookie jar, didn't break any
laws, goes to church every Sunday, never swears, eats her asparagus before
getting her ice cream, and closes with, "and I am not answering any
questions today and am invoking my 5th Amendment privilege, so there, nya
nya nya nya nya." Whoa, hey wait a minute, girl friend. First,
can one invoke the 5th Amendment Privilege while testifying before the US
Congress? After all, it ain't a court room. If the answer is
'NO,' then Ms. Lerner could go to jail for contempt. Number two, if
the answer to (1) is yes, just like in a court room, one cannot waltz,
jitterbug, or foxtrot into court, make statements of denial, "Like, yo, I
did not rob that bank," and then proceed to take the 5th Amendment.
Once you open your big fat mouth and start talking, you have waived your 5th
Amendment rights to further questioning and answering or else what is the
purpose of the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights? If you say you are
standing on the 5th Amendment for ALL of the upcoming questions, then invoke
it and shut up. But don't show up to court or Congress and start
issuing all sorts of statements and denials and then claim you're not going
to answer any future questions because you're standing on the Fifth.
Either stand on the 5th or don't. And while it is OK to take the 5th
on your choice of questions, then do so but don't sit there and say you are
taking the 5th on all further questions that haven't been asked yet and then
rant and rave about your innocence to questions that haven't been asked yet.
Ms. Lerner's attorneys must be idiots. Remember, the reason one takes
the 5th Amendment is because one is claiming that an answer to a question
may tend to incriminate oneself and one cannot be compelled to testify
against oneself. So if you don't know the question yet, how can you
know that said future question may tend to incriminate you? This is
just more of the same
arrogant action by IRS employees lately who have been called before Congress
to answer for wrongdoings and don't want to answer any questions. Just why
were you running a program of tax exempt discrimination against
Conservatives, Tea Partiers, and other Patriot groups, Ms. IRS goon? Tell
us. and, more importantly, tell us WHO gave you that order to do so,
so that we can trace it all the way back to whichever oval room in the White
House it originated. Oops, did I give you a clue? I doubt it
was in the kitchen or the laundry room.
May 13, 2013 Time for the US Congress to impeach Mr. Peachy Obama.
Why? For lying to the American public about why he told the US
military guarding the Benghazi Consulate to "stand down" and allow our
ambassador and three other Americans to be slaughtered on the premises.
And why would Mr. Impeachment-bait do that? Because it looks like he
was trying to cover up the running of guns to the Muslim Brotherhood in
Syria. Not that the Syrian government is any great saint.
Neither the Syrian government or the Muslim Brotherhood are fighting for
individual rights and freedoms. They're both just different shades of
altruistic state collectivism, or rather altruistic church collectivism,
same thing in the Middle East. But the problem with Obama playing this
dangerous game is that he apparently was willing to sacrifice American
officials and then try to cover it all up by hoaking up a phony anti-Muslim
video and blaming it on some poor nitwit producer in Hollywood. And
while Sec of State Hillary Clinton may not have given the "stand down"
orders -- mainly because the Joint chiefs of Staff do not report to the
Bitch of State who likes to lie to US Congressional investigators -- she
participated in the whole UN Ambassador Susan Rice fake video ruse.
And Clinton had the temerity to scream -- literally scream -- at the US
Congressional investigators, "At this point, who cares" about how the
terrorists overran the Benghazi Consulate and raped, tortured, and murdered
our Ambassador and three other Americans. "Maybe the terrorists were
just out for a stroll, or maybe who knows whaterver," she implied as she
then yelled, "At this point, who cares, the deed is done?" Well, Bitch
of State Clinton, guess what? The murdered victims' families care.
We care. We care because now we know what you think of us. Now
we know what Obama and YOU think of us American citizens and how you
wouldn't hesitate to throw us to the wolves if it advances your political
agenda both here and abroad. It's one thing to have done the murderous
deed, both at the Obama "stand down" level and the Clinton "I'll go along
with that" level; but it's quite another to blame some poor innocent slob
making a Grade F anti-Muslim movie, send our UN Ambassador Susan Rice around
to lie on all the major TV network talk shows, and try to cover it all up.
Nixon resigned over a 10-cent Watergate burglary that was nothing but a
pissy-assy bugging of the opposition party's politicians. They got him
for obstruction of justice and the cover up, not the bugging crime.
Obama and Thugs, however, set up a murder of four Americans to hide their
nefarious gun running to the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, and then tried to
cover it up. If this isn't an impeachable offense, then I don't know
what is. President Obama and former Sec of State Clinton deserve at
least to be booted out of politics: as in forever. And today
can't be too soon. Strike three, Bud, you're outta there!
Apr 07, 2013 Ah yes, Obamacare "Navigators."
Exactly what this nation now needs to push our economy right down the tubes
into total national socialism. What the hell is an Obamacare
Navigator? What kind of federal job
is that? A Navigator is a previous
Obama Acorn neighborhood "organizer" -- or pimp -- whose job it will be to
explain to the public, door to door, how to
navigate through the bureaucratic federal health care maze that
is being shoved down our throats because US Supreme Court Justice Roberts
did not have the balls to call a spade a spade: i.e. Obamacare should
have been dumped a long time ago because it is obviously unconstitutional.
A 12-year child could have figured that out. Obama's cleverly created
new militia of health care police, the Navigators,
are slated to be paid up to $48 per hour, which is about $100,000 per year
plus benefits. How many Navigators
does Obama think we might need in the US? Estimates for California are
21,000 Navigators. Crunching the
numbers, if CA has 38 million people and the US population is 315 million,
that means the US needs about 8.3 x 21,000
Navigators. That equals about 175,000
Navigators to tell Americans how to
navigate through our screwed up
nationalized health care system. What else will these Navigators do?
According to the White House, Navigators
should be the same ethnic percentage of those whose neighborhoods they will
be invading. That way, they will all be speaking the same 'George
Orwell 1984' New Speak, especially when the
Navigators get to the bottom of their forms and ask Joe Citizen
for his political affiliation information. No lie. They will be
asking for the home owner's/renter's political affiliation. And, oh
yeah, they will also be asking about each Joe Doe's personal medical
information so they can do their job of navigating
the poor slob through Obama's 2,700 pages of federal health care bullshit,
which even Congress and the President can't decipher. But the
Navigators can. Somehow.
Because as soon as you attach the words 'federal government' to anything, it
becomes clear as a bell. Ding dong. How do you feel about
telling some pimp-looking Bozo knocking on your door all about Aunt Tillie's
back ache, sister Suzie's pregnancy, and Mom's cancer treatment, plus give
out the social security numbers for everybody in the family so the
Navigator can do his/her job? Swoosh,
there goes doctor-patient confidentiality out the door. Bingo, there
goes your SS number into the files of all the computer hackers in the world
as the Navigators figure out they can
make a lot more money selling your personal info to hackers and advertisers
with mailing lists. The sheer invasion of privacy alone should make
Americans and state politicians shudder with fear. Unfortunately, it
didn't make Idaho legislators shudder with anything since the idiots were
the first GOP state to pass a state health care exchange in the nation and
have now been informed -- the dolts -- that the state, not the federal
government -- gets to pick up the costs for their state
Navigators. Yeah, really brilliant,
Gov Butch Otter. Really brilliant. Didn't see that one coming
did you? And there will be lots more bureaucracy coming Idaho's way,
too. We tried to tell you not to deal with the devil but you wouldn't
listen. Maybe you'll catch on later, who knows?
Jan 25, 2013 More on Sec of State Hillary Clinton and the so-called
Congressional Inquiry into what happened regarding the Benghazi Murders at
our US Embassy in Libya. First, it was not an inquiry. All
Democratic Senators on the committee simply smooched Hillary Clinton's butt
and gave a speech. Second, only three Republicans asked Hillary any
pertinent questions. Third, Hillary did not answer any questions --
pertinent or not -- but
rather went off on tirades that had nothing to do with a real inquiry.
But the really horrible thing that happened was that the whole
"investigative" circus reveals how absurd Congress has become, what low
level bureaucrats the US now has installed in important positions of power
-- such as Sec of State -- and how bad off the US will be perceived in the
near future. Ms. Clinton stated that the State Dept has 70,000
employees. 70,000 employees! If we have 70 embassies in 70 major
countries, that's 1,000 State Dept employees at each embassy. What
overkill! What could all these clowns be doing? Certainly not
their jobs or else we wouldn't be talking about the Benghazi Murders at an
investigative hearing in Congress. Hillary states that she was not
aware of much of anything. She had no budget money, she claims, but
Sen. Rand Paul pointed out all the millions of dollars the State Dept has
spent on parties and other crap. Hillary, in response to Sen.
Johnson's question about the sequence of events that brought about the
Benghazi Murders and storming and burning of our embassy, literally jumped
out of her chair and screamed, "Who cares? We have four dead people.
What difference does it make whether it was a terrorist act or some guy
decided it would be fun to knock off Americans at our Libyan Embassy?"
But wait a minute, Ms. Sec of State. It DOES make a difference and
that is precisely WHY we are conducting this hearing. As Sen. Rand
Paul stated, "I would have relieved you of your post, Ms. Secretary."
Sen. Paul asked whether Hillary was aware of what was going on in a huge
warehouse building next to the Benghazi Embassy since it was widely rumored that
guns and other weapons may have been stored and distributed from said
building as there has been a lot of recent shipping activity nearby.
Hillary said she did not know anything about the goings on at a building
next door. I have an important
question for Hillary: if you are building an embassy, doesn't it
behoove you to know what is going on around your embassy? Same with
the supposed Osama bin Laden compound in Pakistan right next door to
Pakistan's "West Point." Doesn't it behoove the Pakistani govt AND the
US to know
what the hell is going on in what looks like Ft. Knox down the road apiece?
Duh. Bottom line: Obama has no foreign policy; Sec of State
Hillary Clinton was just a low level mindless bureaucrat going through the
motions, and Congress is showing itself to be totally irrelevant. Along with the Judicial
Dept and all of Washington DC. You are now witnessing the rapid
decline of the American Republic. If anybody who worked for me replied
as Hillary has over the last two days, I would have immediately fired their
little asses. Which is exactly what should have happened to Ms.
Clinton four months ago. And our US President is not even a legitimate citizen,
much less a president of anything. At most, he's a puppet of the
Federal Reserve. Plus, the GOP has totally imploded
into it's own altruistic state collectivism, no different than the economic
fascists who call themselves "progressives."
Jan 23, 2013 Sec of State Hillary Clinton has now recovered sufficiently
from her fake "bonk on the head" to show up to a Congressional Inquiry about
the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the Benghazi Embassy murders in
Libya last year that took four American lives. Prez Obama and
Ambassador Rice concocted a ridiculous story that some bozo in Hollywood
created a YouTube video that made fun of Muslims and Allah, and that that
sparked a riot against the US compound in Libya. Rice ran around
babbling this YouTube video excuse on all the major TV talk shows, President
Obama babbled this same excuse in the Rose Garden with Hillary standing by
clinching her teeth and not looking like she agreed with him, and the FBI
even arrested and detained some guy in Hollywood who supposedly produced or
financed or shot the alleged video. We now know that the YouTube video
excuse was total bull dukie. The big question is: why did Obama
and the administration try to pull the wool over America's eyes? What
was really going on? Did the Obama administration try to do a "fast
and furious" guns deal out of Libya with other nations such as Turkey, like
the failed "fast and furious" guns deal with Mexico? Or is Obama and
his administration really just a bunch of bunglers in foreign affairs?
Now, Sec of State Hillary Clinton is testifying before Congress that (1) she
needs more money, (2) it's her responsibility but wasn't her fault (really?
how does that work?), (3) American embassies are being attacked all over the
world (I wonder why), (4) she has implemented a new better plan so it will
never happen again, (5) Obama did the right thing, (6) Ambassador Rice did
the right thing, and (7) blah blah blah bureaucratic double-talk about
everything except the who, what, when, where, why and how behind the
Benghazi incident. Nobody asked Sec of State Clinton any REAL
questions -- except Senators John McCain and Rand Paul who completely
disagreed with her answers, refuted all of them, and ripped her a new one.
In short, the upshot of the congressional hearing today was nothing except
the Liberals kissing Hillary's butt, only one or two GOP senators standing
up to slap her stupid answers silly, and all that was accomplished is that
Hillary was a good little girl who pretended to exonerate the Obama
administration -- and cover her own ass -- so she can run for the Oval
Office in 2016. Nobody, and I mean nobody, except possibly Sen. Rand
Paul at other times outside today's Benghazi Hearings, have asked the
fundamental question: what the hell is the US doing sticking its nose
in the business of all the nations in the Middle East in the first place?
We are there because the central bankers and OPEC oil ministers are hell
bent on fixing the monopoly price of oil, forcing all participants to use
only Federal Reserve Notes for all oil transactions as agreed upon at the
last Bretten Woods meeting some time ago. And these banking/oil
parties have convinced both GOP and Liberal Congressmen to use the US
Military to protect those fundamental banking interests. So now all we hear
about is a continual tit-for-tat response to whichever side's latest
bombing, or who shot at who last week, or who blew up which embassy or trade
center last. It's no different than two tribes in the jungle
committing atrocities against each other for whatever the other tribe did
last week. America has been reduced to a feud between the Hatfields
and the McCoys. Nobody wants to ask the fundamental question.
And the people who keep the wars going, the bankers, the oil companies, the
arms manufacturers, the vendors supplying the military, and the bureaucrats
who wring their hands at committee hearings such as the Benghazi Murders and
bloviate a bunch of bullshit are busy running the Big Show. With you,
the taxpayer, financing all of it -- in more ways than you will ever know.
Hyper-inflation of non gold-backed money has serious consequences, both
nationally and internationally. If you do not understand how the
central bankers are the fundamental root problem, then you do not understand
what money really is. And Hillary may get away with the Benghazi
debacle and run for president in 2016.
U of Idaho
Wallace pleads GUILTY in $136 mil University Place fiasco...
Deep Throat II, Deepest Throat...how
many damn Deep Throats are there in Idaho anyway?
About the author...I
was born at the Alamo. Then we moved to Japan. Then to
California, where I learned the dirty bop. Attended UC Berkeley.
Got drafted into the Army. Worked for the Assistant Chief of Staff,
Intelligence, in the Pentagon and Saigon, Vietnam...in a steel vault two
feet thick with cipher locks. Top Secret Crypto Eyes Only security
clearance. Cranked up four corporations. Managed Pacific
Northwest branch of a NY Software Company. Moved to Boise,
Idaho. I'm an investigative journalist writing under a fake name.
Nobody would name their kid "Deep." And no, my last name is not
"Throat." I dig up dirty laundry. Dirty political laundry.
On the QT. Hush-hush. It's a dirty job, long hours and the pay
stinks. But it's a living and there's lots of dirty political laundry
in Idaho. I lean over a lot of fences, drink a lot of Rocket Java, and
listen through beer mugs pressed against bathroom walls. Right now I'm
on my way down to check out another dead body at the Idaho State
Legislature. I better be careful...or it might be my own.
-- Deep Throat II Contact author
What they're saying about
"Of course it was a fix.
It's an incestuous mess."
-- Senator Stan Hawkins (R-Ucon), 18-year
legislator who voted NO on the University Place fiasco
"You are on the right track.
But you need deeper background. I have it. I know where every
skeleton is buried. But I need deepest cover. You cannot reveal
anything about me, not even where or how or by what means you obtain info
from me. Zip, zilch, zero, nada. You must protect this source
even if a judge threatens to send you to jail for contempt."
-- Deepest Throat, anonymous source
"Finally, someone with the
brains and guts enough to connect the dots between the $100 million Ada
County Court House scam and the $136 million University Place fiasco as one
big crime spree against the taxpayers by the Boise lawyers, politicians, and
Cryptic Partners. A fast read, this book deserves to become a best
-- Sharon Ullman, Ada County Commissioner (2001-2003,
"The political philosophy of our
Founding Fathers is so thoroughly buried under decades of statist
misrepresentations on one side and empty lip-service on the other, that it
has to be re-discovered not ritualistically repeated."
-- Ayn Rand
Holy moley, look how fast America is going bankrupt:
(click on the puddy)
Knowing What We Know Now, Would
You Say that Jeb Bush is Retarded?
by Ann Coulter
Washington, DC -- Was Jeb Bush too busy watching
tele-novelas during his brother's presidency to remember the Iraq War?
We went to war at such
breakneck speed after 9/11, that, before the invasion, I was able to write
approximately 30 columns about it, give five dozen speeches on it, discuss
it on TV a hundred times and read 1,089 New York Times editorials denouncing
the "rush to war."
So I remember the arguments.
Contrary to the fairy tale
the left has told itself since Obama truculently gave away America's victory
in Iraq, our argument wasn't that we had to invade Iraq because of Saddam
Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. And the left's argument certainly was
not: "He doesn't have any WMDs!"
Our argument was: There were
lots of reasons to get rid of Saddam Hussein, and none to keep him.
Indeed, after Bush's State
of the Union address laying out the case for war with Iraq, The New York
Times complained that he had given too many reasons: "Even the rationale for
war seems to change from day to day. Mr. Bush ticked off a litany of
accusations against Iraq in his State of the Union address ..." (New York
Times, Feb. 2, 2003)
Among the reasons we invaded
(1) Saddam had given shelter
to terrorists who killed Americans. After 9/11, it was time for him to pay
-- The mastermind of the
Achille Lauro hijacking, Abu Abbas, who murdered a wheelchair-bound American
citizen, Leon Klinghoffer, then forced the passengers to throw his body
overboard, was living happily in Iraq. (Captured by U.S. forces in Baghdad
less than a month after our invasion.)
-- The terrorist who
orchestrated the murder of American diplomat Laurence Foley in October 2002,
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, also took refuge in Saddam's Iraq. (Killed by U.S.
forces in Iraq on June 7, 2006.)
-- The one terrorist behind
the 1993 World Trade Center bombing who got away, Abdul Rahman Yasin, fled
to Iraq, where he was given money and lived without fear of being extradited
to the United States. (Whereabouts unknown. Possibly being groomed for a
prime-time show on MSNBC.)
-- Czech intelligence
reported that Mohammed Atta, 9/11 mastermind, More...
Staged Fake Zero Dark Thirty Raid to Knock Off bin Laden?
Washington, DC -- Legendary journalist Seymour Hersh has recently claimed
that President Obama's alleged take down of terrorist master mind Osama bin
Laden in a zero dark thirty helicopter raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011
contained many inaccuracies.
According to Hersh's American and
Pakistani intelligence sources, Osama bin Laden had already been captured by
Pakistan and was being held prisoner in the Abbottabad compound since 2006.
Whether the Americans knew about this in 2006 when Bush was president, Hersh
didn't say,... yet.
If President Obama found out after he came into
office in 2009, it appears that the Obama Administration saved this
knowledge so that it could make use of it in a future take down of bin Laden
for political marketing reasons. Like running for a second US
Presidential term. Also, there was no Navy Seal fire fight.
Instead, Pakistani intelligence insiders allegedly rigged it so that US
choppers could fly across Pakistan borders without setting off alarms,
landed at the Abbottabad compound, Navy Seals hopped out, ran upstairs and
one US trooper simply shot bin Laden dead.
Then, according to Hersh's sources, the US Seals loaded
bin Laden into a body bag and dumped him out of a plane or chopper over some
rugged mountainous terrain while claiming that they carried his body to a US
aircraft carrier and gave bin Laden a "proper Islamic" burial at sea.
But here's the thing. If all of this -- and more -- is true, then that
would mean that President Obama and various high level administrative
officials were holding Osama bin Laden as marketing fodder (for many years)
so President Obama could make an announcement of bin Laden's capture so
Americans would cheer and vote for him for a second presidential term:
Hey, looky, looky, stupid American public. I
(President Obama) found bin Laden all of a sudden and have ordered a top
secret raid to take out this evil terrorist to save America, yahoo, etc.!
Note that this scenario is not far off from... More...
to be Charged with Desertion
reporters at WND
Seven months after the
military began an investigation into the disappearance of Army Sgt. Bowe
Bergdahl and his capture by the Taliban, which held him for five years, a
new report indicates Army officials have determined Bergdahl — for whom the
administration traded five top Gitmo-held terrorists — will be charged as a
Retired Lt. Col. Tony
Shaffer, a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, made the
startling claim during an appearance on “The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News.
Bergdahl’s attorney has
received the charges, according to Shaffer, who claims the Obama
administration is withholding the report.
O’Reilly said the White
House has had this information for a while but has been delaying it under
the auspices of Ben Rhodes, assistant national security adviser.
“This is shaping up to be a
Titanic struggle behind the scenes,” Shaffer said. “Believe me, the Army
here wants to do the right thing. Factually, there’s no way they can not do
the right thing regarding Bergdahl. And the White President Obama cozying up to the parents and because
he, President Obama, releasing the five Taliban. … The narrative is what the
White House does not want to have come out.”
Bergdahl was recovered in
Afghanistan by U.S. troops in a controversial swap for five Taliban
officials on May 31. He had disappeared from his small patrol base on June
30, 2009, under a cloud of suspicion and fear as it became clear he been
captured by militants.
The Army in June launched a
new investigation into Bergdahl’s disappearance and capture, amid a raft of
accusations from his fellow soldiers that he walked away from his unit on
the battlefield and questions about whether the Obama administration handled
the prisoner swap legally.
On Jan. 11, the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, said he anticipated a
decision “fairly soon” on whether the Army would court martial Bergdahl for
deserting his post.
“In White House terms, not
charging Bergdahl means that he was indeed worth the trade for the Taliban
Five. But charging him on any level means that releasing the five Taliban
was an error of monstrous proportions, one the administration will...
Conclude Obama Backed Al-Qaida
Jerome R. Corsi at WND
“In early 2011, before
Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship,
and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’
which basically means Christopher Stevens was
America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,”
explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who served as a career
operations officer with the CIA and currently is vice president for research
at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.
Kevin Shipp, a former CIA counterintelligence
expert who worked on the seventh floor at Langley as protective staff to
then-CIA Director William Casey, again speaking for himself in his interview
with WND, agreed with Lopez that the
gun-running operation Stevens managed is a secret the Obama White House and
Clinton State Department have sought to suppress from the public.
“The shocking part,
maybe even a violation of international law
that the Obama administration has been terrified to have fully revealed,
is that Stevens as part of his duties as a State Department employee was
assisting in the shipment of arms first into Libya for the al-Qaida-affiliated
militia, with the weapons shipped subsequently out of Libya into Syria for
use by the al-Qaida-affiliated rebels fighting Assad,” Shipp told WND.
these gun-running activities could be looked
at even as treasonable offenses,” he
impeachment? -- FM Duck
NEW YORK – The Obama White
House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing
a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated
rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the
Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.
In WND interviews, several
members of the commission have disclosed their finding that the mission of
Christopher Stevens, prior to the fall of Gadhafi and during Stevens’ time
as U.S. ambassador, was the management of a secret gun-running program
operated out of the Benghazi compound.
The Obama administration’s
gun-running project in Libya, much like the “fast and furious” program under
Eric Holder’s Justice Department, operated without seeking or obtaining
authorization by Congress.
WND reported Monday that in
exclusive interviews conducted with 11 of the 17 members of the commission,
it is clear that while the CCB is still enthusiastic to work with Rep. Trey
Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, and
hopeful that Boehner is serious about the investigation, various members of
the CCB, speaking on their own behalf and not as spokesmen for the
commission, are expressing concerns, wanting to make sure the Gowdy
investigation is not compromised by elements within the GOP.
The Citizen’s Commission on
Benghazi’s interim report, in a paragraph titled “Changing sides in the War
on Terror,” alleges “the U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the
delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias throughout the
The report asserted the
jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic
terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S.
officials responsible for Libya policy.
“The rebels made no secret
of their Al Qaeda affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the
black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple
media reports,” the interim report said. “And yet, the White House and
senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy
that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple
a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al
The report concluded: “The
result in Libya, across much of North Africa, and beyond has been utter
chaos, disruption of Libya’s oil industry, the spread of dangerous weapons
(including surface-to-air missiles), and the empowerment of jihadist
organizations like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Christopher Stevens: ’1st
U.S. envoy to al-Qaida’
In the WND interviews,
several members of the citizens’ commission, speaking for themselves, not
for the commission, added important background to the interim report’s
“In early 2011, before
Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship,
and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically
means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,”
explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who... More...
Suis Charlie," but "Je Suis Socialist"
Washington, DC -- Islamic terrorists knocked off 12 French journalists at Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris yesterday for publishing satirical cartoons
depicting Allah. Not a big surprise since this magazine has been
attacked and blown up by Islamic terrorists over the last ten years.
There are millions of Islamic Muslims living in France but not integrated
into the socialist French economy. There is a double debacle going on
in France as the Islamic Muslims are also living in a highly bureaucratic
socialist society. In fact, the Muslims came to France specifically to
obtain jobs and the "free" welfare goodies distributed by the French socialist
nation. But as the Muslims showed up to socialist France, they quickly
learned that socialist bureaucracy, namely jobs, is based upon who you know,
not what you can accomplish or produce. So the Islamic Muslims are
essentially frozen out of the non-free market socialist economy and stuck in
Muslim ghettoes. We're talking 5 million Muslims in Paris No-Go Zones.
No-Go for even the cops. Just like the blacks in America are stuck in the
state collectivist welfare ghettoes created by American left Liberal
Progressive Democrats who have created welfare economies in most major
cities of America.
And look at the results in both cases: France
and America. Islamic Muslims are stuck in poverty in the socialist
ghettoes in France, especially Paris, and Afro Americans are stuck in
poverty in the socialist ghettoes in America.
Who is at fault in both cases? The culprits, of course, are... More...
Falsely Yells "Fire!" in a Crowded Theatre
Dec 5, 2014
Washington, DC --
President Obama -- and
other race-baiting social and political pundits -- are yelling "Fire!" in a
crowded theatre where there is no fire. This is not an exercise of
freedom of speech. In a crowded theatre, there is an implied contract
between everybody in the theatre that they will not fraudulently mislead
each other with false statements such as yelling "Fire!" when there is none.
Same for all the drivers on our nations' roads. There is an implied
contract that everybody is not under the influence of mind altering
substances -- such as alcohol -- that would cause them to crash their car
into others. That's why the police can legally compel you to take
blood alcohol tests and are not violating your rights.
Similarly, the exercise of
freedom of speech does not include yelling "Racism!" by the President of the
United States to a crowded, predominantly African American ghetto, in cases
when a white police officer defends himself and kills a black perpetrator
attacking the police officer or resisting arrest. Especially, once a
grand jury has handed down an indictment of innocence, and all the objective
evidence shows that there was no racism involved. Fraudulent cries of
"Racism!" by the President of the US or the US Attorney General or the mayor
of the city when there is no proof is not the exercise of freedom of speech
but rather a case of fraudulently yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre,
causing people to riot and/or trample each other under false pretenses.
Which is exactly what we now have in many cities across America.
It is also not within the authority
of the President -- or other race-baiting social or political pundits -- to
attempt to retry a grand jury case in the news media. This is the
equivalent of a lynch mob, a group of people who already know what they... More...
Urges Public to Not Riot in Ferguson Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San
Francisco, Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise
Idaho and All Major Cities in America
Nov 27, 2014
Washington, DC --
Immediately after the
grand jury in Ferguson, Mo, came down with an indictment of "NOT GUILTY" --
i.e., not enough evidence to warrant a jury trial -- against Ferguson police
officer Darren Wilson for shooting and killing Michael Brown in self-defense
after a robbery and altercation earlier this year, President Barack Obama
casually sauntered onto national TV at 9 pm EST holding the crotch of his
pants with one hand and urged the public
to not riot in Ferguson Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San
Francisco, Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise
Idaho and all major cities in America.
"And don't throw no fire
bombs, shoot any weapons, set cars on fire, smash windows, beat up innocent
bystanders, or say anything nasty to the police, National Guard, or yo
Momma," added the President. "And brush your teeth before bed."
"We are a nation of laws, not of racist
tribalism," said President Obama as he uttered how every blind crack head in
the streets with no forensic evidence, not having interviewed all the
witnesses, and not knowing jack $hit about the Michael Brown Ferguson case,
is "understandably upset, even angry," at the result of last night's
non-indictment of police officer Darren Wilson, even though, by the way,
happenchance, did I happen to mention, said Obama, that Darren Wilson is
white and Michael Brown is black? "This is not a case of racism, even
though race had everything to do with it," said President Obama.
Wonderful Michael Brown, the perp victim, is black as the Ace of Spades, and
the guilty police officer, no offense intended, was whiter than white on
"So," continued President Obama, speaking out of concern
for peaceful demonstrations, "I do not want any of you clear-thinking,
logical, rational, upstanding citizens in all the major cities of America at
exactly 9 pm EST to throw any rocks at the police, shoot any weapons at the
National Guard, or turn over and burn any automobiles such as that blue
Honda in the parking lot over there or... More...
Issues Pink Slips to US Congress
Nov 21, 2014
Washington, DC --
In a sweeping gesture of
Executive action, Emperor Obama issued pink slips to all 535 members of the
US Congress. 100 US Senators and 435 US Representatives of what used to be
the US Congress were terminated from their public service jobs last night as
Emperor Obama stepped up to the podium in the Oval Office on national TV and
summarily fired their asses. “I have a pen, and I have a phone,”
declared Emperor Obama as he issued his 1 millionth Executive Order which
effectively dissolves the US Congress and thus all legislative power of that
now defunct body. Ipso facto, Emperor Obama has, therefore, dissolved the
US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and
the Federalist Papers since these documents no longer apply to the checks
and balances and explicit duties of the previous three branches of
government as stated in the now also defunct US Constitution.
In addition to
dissolving the US Congress, Emperor Obama, de facto, also dissolved the
Judicial Branch of government since there is now no legislation for the US
Supreme Court to adjudicate, i.e. determine whether said legislation is
constitutional or not.
implication of Emperor Obama’s issuance of pink slips to all 535 members of
Congress is a pink slip for each of the previous United State’s 50
individual state governors who now sit unconstitutionally as heads of each
state, there being no US Constitution and therefore no US states. If there
are no 50 individual states, then none of those states have legitimate state
legislatures. All the Senators and Representatives of New York, California,
Idaho, Vermont, and the other 46 states have no constitutional functions any
longer. There is no longer a United States; there is only a North American
continent -- with no borders.
third implication of dissolving the US Congress, all state legislatures and
all state governors is that there is no longer any need for... More...
Who Really Killed Osama bin Laden?
Nov 15, 2014
New York, NY --
Well lah dee dah and whoop tee doo. Navy Seal Robert O'Neil is
traipsing around the national TV talk show circuits such as Hannity
Calamity, Greta van Suspect, William O'Reilly, and Jelly Bean Kelly telling
everybody how it was HE who shot Liberty Valance, oops I mean Pancho Villa,
no no make that Osama bin Laden.
Where was Osama knocked off? In some
compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan on May 1, 2011 on a dark and stormy night.
What about Navy Seal Matt Bissonnette --
interviewed by CBS 60 Minutes' host Scott Pelley -- who claimed he shot OBL
"a handful of times" during the May 1, 2011 Zero Dark Thirty raid to knock
off bin Laden in Whattabaddybody Abbottabad? And after Navy Seal Matt
shot this "somebody" -- because good old Matt said neither he or anybody
else there recognized the dead duck as Osama bin Laden -- a second squad of
Seals running up the stairs pumped a few more rounds into bin Laden.
You know, just to make sure. Uh-huh.
Was this second Navy Seal Robert O'Neil, who
is now claiming that HE was the one who killed Osama bin Laden or was it
another Navy Seal? Who knows? None of the Navy Seals knew Osama
bin Laden from Abduhl the Camel Driver.
So what we got here is at least two stories
by Navy Seals trying to take credit for kicking Osama bin Laden's bucket.
Meanwhile, President Obama and his
administration made sure that there would be no proof given to the American
public about whether OBL was actually killed in this daring and highly
questionable raid or not. Think about it for a minute: More...
Is Sgt Bergdahl Obama's Last Hurrah?
June 08, 2014
Boise, ID -- Sgt Bowe Bergdahl deserted his
US Army platoon in Afghanistan in 2009 and went AWOL. For five years.
For you non-military individuals out there, that means he was Absent Without
Leave, or absent without permission. That also means he deserted his
post in a hostile fire zone, aka during a war. In plain English, that
means that when it was time for him to stand watch to make sure the enemy --
in this case, the Taliban -- did not sneak into their platoon's encampment
and blast everybody away, Sgt Bergdahl was missing.
When Sgt Bergdahl's squad leaders went to wake him up for
guard duty, he was not there. His rifle and flak vest were left on his
bed and he only took a few items such as water and a compass.
In an effort to find out what happened to him,
Bergdahl's squad briefly searched their compound but could not find him.
Then they suited up, grabbed their weapons and started a search outside
their perimeter. Was he captured by the Bad Guys or leave on his own
At the start of their search for Sgt Bergdahl, his
squad ran into several Afghani school children who said they saw an American
soldier crawling through the brush without a weapon and pointed in that
direction. The squad continued their search but finally gave up when
they couldn't find him.
From many discussions with the platoon members and
Sgt Berdahl in the months before he disappeared, his comrades had long since
Why I Do Not Like the Obamas
originally written Jan 5, 2013 by Mychal Massie in The Daily Rant
2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck
Here's an African American
journalist's opinion of the Obamas. These are his words not mine. Even
if you love Obama, you might take a few minutes to read this because it is
unvarnished in its implications for them and our country.
-- FM Duck
Los Angeles -- The other evening on my
twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obamas. Specifically, I was
asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obamas? It seems personal, not
policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what
they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and
legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I
responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't
like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our
country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don't hate them per definition, but I
condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist
Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for
the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit
same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don't like them because they comport
themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no, I demand respect, for the
Office of President, and a love of our country and her citizens from the
leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan
displayed an unparalleled love... More...
So, Just How Bad Was This Super Bowl Rout, Historically Speaking?
By Kenley Young, FOX Sports – Feb 2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck
Note: Super Bowl XLVIII (48 in stupid Roman Numerals that nobody in the
real world ever uses) (i.e., (-X+(L+V+I+I+I)), where L=50, X=10, minus 10
since it’s on the left side of bigger value L, ask the Romans, don’t ask me,
V=5, I=1; Throw Roman Numerals out with the slide rule, OK?)
New York, NY --
Yes, the Denver Broncos looked bad out there on Sunday. Really bad. And
yes, it was a rout of fairly epic proportions, the kind of lopsided affair
we haven't seen in more than a decade.
But no, the
35-point shellacking was not exactly historic.
It wasn't even
the biggest Super Bowl loss in Broncos history. The worst rout in
Super Bowl history? That distinction goes to... More...
Egon von Greyerz,
annotated by FM Duck
Jan 31, 2014
Switzerland -- In November 1910, some powerful US bankers joined by the
influential Paul Warburg had a meeting on Jekyll Island that would determine
the destiny of the world financial system and the world economy for over 100
years. This infamous meeting led to the creation of the Federal Reserve
System in the US on December 23, 1913.
The Fed was
created by private bankers for the benefit of private bankers and today, 100
years later, they have been more successful than they could ever have
imagined in 1913.
Not only have
they created a system that efficiently controls the world financial system
for their personal benefit but also world politics. They totally understood
the advice of Mayer Amschel Rotschild, the founder of the Rothschild banking
dynasty, who famously proclaimed:
“Give me control of the nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”
exactly 100 years now, the Fed and other central bankers have totally
destroyed all major world currencies and left the world with debts that
cannot and will not be repaid with normal money. And whilst achieving this
unprecedented wealth creation for the top level of financiers, they have in
the last 15 years... More...
Magnificent Failure of ObamaCare
by Prof Gary North
Jan 06, 2013
the point of view of a defender of liberty, ObamaCare is the most
magnificent welfare state program of our generation.
Washington, DC -- Premium
expenses are going up for most people. Deductibles are going up for most
people. Cancellation letters are going out to millions of people. The number
of people signing up is less than the number of people who have received
policy-cancellation letters. In short, the costs are being front-loaded, and
the benefits are being back-loaded.
before, welfare state politics has been based on a specific strategy:
"Benefits first. Costs later." This is called front-loading and
back-loading. The best examples of this process are Social Security and
Medicare. The costs are now coming due for these two programs. According to
Prof. Lawrence Kotlikoff, the back-loaded cost of the two programs is now in
the range of $200 trillion, present value. But no one really cares. Those
costs will be imposed in the future. Politicians care only about the
immediate future, namely, the next election.
politicians come to the general public, and they promise that the state will
intervene on the side of the middle class. The state will do so also to help
the poor. The costs will be borne exclusively by the rich. Politicians are
careful never to define how much money... More...
Bond's dirty little spy secret: He's an alcoholic," says Dr. No research team from
Nottingham University Hospitals in England
by Dennis Thompson, Health Day News
Annotated by FM Duck
Dec 14, 2013
the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying
to "expose" that the bigger-than-life character of the James Bond spy novels
was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim, nobody could really
knock off Goldfinger or seduce Pussy Galore if they drank that much alcohol? Really? I suppose their next research task is to prove that Superman can't really fly, or
leap tall buildings in a single bound, or run faster than a locomotive. --
Apparently the Nottingham research team has forgotten what the function of a novel or
movie really is: to provide a means for individuals to experience their
moral philosophy through identification with a bigger-than-life hero who is
knocking off the "bad" -- solving problems -- to bring about "good." Or, do the
researchers have another objective in mind, such as
destroying people's experience of identifying with a bigger-than-life hero
in order to drag them back down to their dreary little lives in state
collectivist Britain and America? -- FM Duck
socialist states hate individualists such as James Bond because they are
seen as threats to the collectivist ideology of the state. It is not
the supposed over-consumption of alcohol that the British socialist
researchers dislike about James Bond; it is his individualistic attitude
that is the basis for their concern because individualism is the basis for
free market capitalism. The last thing the socialist state wants is
for its citizens to be hero-worshipping an individualist. Hence,
especially in a novel or movie that gets distributed to hundreds of millions
of readers and movie-goers, the state propagandists want to prove that James
Bond is just a drunken, impotent, bum. The researchers' real
objective: Worship the state; not the individual. -- FM Duck
England -- Whoa, Holly Goodhead. First, read the following
"research" drivel about your favorite secret agent, James Bond 007,
and then we can look at what the Nottingham University researchers' real
objective is in trying to disparage our favorite spy:
Say the "Dr. No" researchers at Nottingham University
Iconic spy character James Bond drinks so
much and so often that in real life he'd be incapable of chasing down
villains or wooing sexy vamps, a new study contends.
"The level of functioning as
displayed in the books is inconsistent with the physical, mental and indeed
sexual functioning expected from someone drinking this much alcohol," wrote
a team led by Dr. Patrick Davies, of Nottingham University Hospitals, in
His team analyzed the famous
spy's alcohol consumption and found that it was more than four times higher
than the recommended intake for an adult male.
This puts Bond at high risk
for several alcohol-related diseases -- including alcoholic liver disease,
cirrhosis, impotence and alcohol-induced tremor. Because of his heavy
drinking, the real 007 would have a life expectancy of 56, doctors say.
The alcohol-induced tremor
may explain why Bond prefers his martinis "shaken, not stirred," the study
authors joked. They added that the alcoholism-induced tremor in his hands
means he's unlikely to be able to stir his drinks, even if he wants to.
Davies' group launched the
study because they were struck by the fact that the amount of Bond's
drinking in the original books seemed rather high. They wondered if he could
actually carry out his missions and woo so many women at this level of
Based on a thorough reading
of all of the books, the study authors concluded that Bond's average alcohol
consumption was 92 units per week -- over four times the recommended amount.
This figure excludes days when Bond was unable to drink.
A unit of alcohol is about
10 milliliters of pure alcohol -- about the same amount found in the average
glass of scotch, bourbon or other hard liquor.
The spy's maximum daily
alcohol intake was almost 50 units per day and he had only 12.5 alcohol-free
days out of the 87.5 days he was able to drink, according to the findings in
the Christmas edition of the journal BMJ.
Bond might even be a road
hazard, since he frequently drank enough to put him over the legal limit
before he climbed into his car.
Many studies have shown that
people generally underestimate their alcohol consumption by about 30
percent, which means that Bond's alcohol consumption may be as high as 130
units per week, the study authors said.
It's clear that 007 needs
help, the authors said. "We advise an immediate referral for further
assessment and treatment [and] a reduction in alcohol consumption to safe
levels," they concluded.
They also noted that
excessive drinking is a global health problem that causes 2.5 million deaths
a year. However, movies and other sources of entertainment often portray
drinking in a positive, even glamorous, way.
Analysis by FM Duck:
How far has the welfare state of Britain gone when a team of
researchers at Nottingham University Hospitals stooped to the level of
claiming -- after supposedly "a thorough reading" of all the James Bond spy
novels -- that fictional character James Bond consumed 90 drinks of alcohol a week
(that's 13 drinks per day) and thus would be too drunk to perform all of his
007, secret agent, shoot 'em up, Pussy Galore activities for His Majesty's Secret Service?
the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying
to "expose" that the bigger-than-life fictional character of the
James Bond spy novels was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim,
Mandela: In His Own Words
by Joseph Farah at WND
Dec 09, 2013
Washington, DC -- As world leaders offer false praise at the funeral of the
supposedly peace-loving former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela,
let's read the following quotes directly from Mandela himself that you will
not read in the international press:
1) “If there is a country that has committed
unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America.
They don’t care for human beings.”
2) “Long live the Cuban revolution. Long live comrade
Fidel Castro … Cuban internationalists have done so much for African
independence, freedom and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban
people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a
vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban
revolution. We too want to control our destiny. … There can be no surrender.
It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of
inspiration to all freedom-loving people.”
3) “[T]he people of Asia and Africa have seen through
the slanderous campaign conducted by the USA against the socialist
countries. They know that their independence is threatened not by any of the
countries in the socialist camp but by the USA, who has surrounded their
continent with military bases. The communist bogey is an American stunt to
distract the attention of the people of Africa from the real issue facing
them, namely, American imperialism.”
4) “Under a Communist Party government, South Africa
will become a land of milk and honey. Political, economic and social rights
will cease to be enjoyed by whites only. They will be shared equally by
whites and non-whites. There will be enough land and houses for all. There
will be no unemployment, starvation and disease. Workers will earn decent
wages; transport will be cheap and education free.”
5) “Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom
fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of
the Palestinian people.”
6) “The cause of communism is the greatest cause in
the history of mankind!”
7) “Those who feel irritated by our friendship with
President Khadafy can go jump in the pool.”
8) “There’s one place where (Fidel Castro’s) Cuba
stands out head and shoulders above the rest – that is in its love...
Mandela: Man of Peace or Terrorist Commie?
Dec 08, 2013
minutes from the 1982 SACP
meeting (South African Communist Party), said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof
[that Nelson Mandela was a member].
'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody
is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he
"Worse yet, the
ends in both cases
(Mandela's and Obama's) are: terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the
are just as bad as the terrorist
Johannesburg, South Africa -- While the world
heaps praises and weeps for the recent passing of Nelson Mandela,
former leader of the revolt against South African apartheid, reporters Colin
Freeman and Jane Flanagan for the British newspaper The Telegraph, reveal
"...research by a
British historian, Professor Stephen Ellis, has unearthed fresh evidence
that during his early years as an activist, Mr. Mandela did hold senior rank
in the South African Communist Party, or SACP. He says Mr. Mandela
joined the SACP to enlist the help of the Communist superpowers for the
ANC's campaign of armed resistance to white rule. His book also
provides fresh detail on how the ANC's military wing had bomb-making lessons
from the IRA, and intelligence training from the East German Stasi, which it
used to carry out brutal interrogations of suspected "spies" at secret
prison camps. The former South African president, who won the Nobel
Peace Prize in 1993, has always denied being a member of the South African
branch of the movement, which mounted an armed campaign of guerrilla
resistance along with the ANC. As evidence of Mr. Mandela's Communist
party membership, Prof Ellis cites minutes from a secret 1982 SACP meeting,
discovered in a collection of private papers at the University of Cape Town,
in which a veteran former party member, the late John Pule Motshabi, talks
about how Mr. Mandela was a party member some two decades before.
the minutes, Mr. Motshabi, is quoted as saying:
'There was an accusation that we opposed allowing Nelson [Mandela] and
Walter (Sisulu, a fellow activist) into the Family (a code word for the
party) ... we were not informed because this was arising after the 1950
campaigns (a series of street protests). The recruitment of the two came
after.' While other SACP members have
previously confirmed Mr. Mandela's party membership, many of their
testimonies were given under duress in police interviews, where they might
have sought to implicate him. However, the minutes from the 1982 SACP
meeting, said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof.
'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody
is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he
So how are we to judge Nelson Mandela:
a man of peace or a terrorist commie?
fought against racial segregation in South Africa but enlisted the aid of
Soviet Communists and IRA bomb makers to kill innocent people. He associated with the
terrorist organization ANC, the African National Congress -- which was officially listed as
a terrorist group by the US
Government during the Cold War of the1950's and 60's. Both white and
black innocent citizens were bombed, interrogated and tortured to death by
Nelson Mandela's communist party.
It is rather hypocritical to only look at Mr. Mandela's peaceful actions
against apartheid and dismiss the truth of his communist and terrorist
actions, including the killing of thousands of innocent people. This is reminiscent of our own
President Barack Obama's close association with the terrorist group The
Weather Underground whose leaders Bill Ayres and his wife Bernardine Dohrn
were convicted of blowing up an American police station, other sites and
buildings, and killing several
people during their terrorist spree in the 1960's and 1970's.
Weathermen grew out of the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) faction of
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). It took its name from the lyric
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the
wind blows", from the Bob Dylan song
"Subterranean Homesick Blues."
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"
was the title of a position paper they
distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding
document called for a "white fighting force"
to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement"
and other radical movementsto achieve "the destruction of 'US
imperialism' and achieve a classless world: world communism."
Does anybody notice a social-political-economic trend here,
by Nelson Mandela and Barack Obama? Both men's moral philosophy leads
to the horrors of state collectivism.
Nelson Mandela used the terrorism of
his communist party against innocent people -- black and white -- to fight against racial
segregation and implement Marxism. For this, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993. Barack Obama
is using Marxist terrorism in the US today to
fight for a one-world state collectivist government modeled after the
teachings of Karl Marx. For this, Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in
Like Nelson Mandela, Barack's other close associations include state
collectivist activists and terrorists such as Rev. Jeremiah Wright
who screamed, "Not God Bless America... but God damn America," Louis Farrakhan of the fanatical
Nation of Islam, and, more importantly for today, Obama's obvious
supportive association with the Middle East's Muslim Brotherhood which
includes Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other fanatical Muslim groups who are hell bent on a jihad against the
Satan," America, the "Little Satan," Israel, plus all Christians, Jews, Gays, Women,
and everybody else they call "Infidels."
What is the Take Home Lesson
of all of this?
What kind of moral philosophy allows one to play
the role of a terrorist dictator either directly (Nelson Mandela) or indirectly (Barack Obama), be
awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, and pretend that their Marxist ends justify their
means? Answer: State collectivism,
whether it's fascism, socialism, or communism.
Worse yet, the
ends in both cases (Mandela's and
Obama's) are: terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the
Marxist ends are just as bad as the
Contrast this with the actions of the American Founding Fathers who fought
and I Learned at Columbia: How to Destroy America from Within
by Wayne Allyn root at
The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck
Nov 12, 2013
"America's decline under Obama isn't due to mistake, ignorance, or
incompetence." -- Wayne Allyn Root
the time the Middle Class realizes he's the killer and they're the prey,
they'll already be dead." -- Wayne Allyn Root
NV -- Remember when Geraldo opened Al Capone’s
vault live on national TV? Well I’m about to solve the mystery of Obama. I’m
about to break “the Obama code.” I’m about to tell you everything about the
way Obama, and the people around him, really think. I’m about to rip open
the true Obama plan to destroy our country. Because I was there when the
plan was hatched.
How do I know all this? Because I was Barack Obama’s
college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. I was easy to
recognize – the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I
knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was
“Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at
the corner of Marx Blvd. and Lenin Drive.
I’m only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were
not far off. [Note: same for FM Duck, the
Lone Libertarian, who attended a similar experience at UC Berkeley in the
Everyone needs to hear my story because what Obama and I
learned at Columbia explains EXACTLY what Obama is doing to America today.
The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs;
the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners;
the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the
overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of
Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in
dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability, and now
free health care.
It’s all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I
learned at Columbia.
America’s decline under Obama isn’t due to mistake,
ignorance, or incompetence at the hands of a community organizer. It’s a
purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to... More...
Cover Up -- Why Obama Really Wants to go to War in Syria
by Wayne Allyn root at
The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck
Sep 13, 2013
NV -- Let’s take an honest look at what Obama is
doing to black Americans and his own most loyal supporters. It is, in a
It all starts with Syria. Why Syria? Why now? Until
Russia interceded, going to war in Syria seemed the most important thing in
the world to Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry. They seemed
DESPERATE to go to war, at any costs.
But why? Syria has nothing to do with us. They are not
threatening us. Their own war is a civil war with no “good guys.” How does
America benefit from a war with Syria? Why did Obama suddenly decide a “red
line” has been crossed, when there are “red lines” all over the world-
including the killing of Christians and the burning of 71 Christian churches
in Egypt. Why is it so important to risk American lives to defend the Syrian
rebels- who are partners with Al Qaeda, America’s sworn enemy? We didn’t go
to war to avenge the murder of our own citizens at Benghazi, so why would we
go to war to avenge Al Qaeda deaths in Syria? None of this makes any sense
Until you realize it’s a massive cover-up. Obama’s WMD-
Weapon of Mass Distraction. Obama is desperate to cover-up the facts about
his dying economy and the damage he’s done to his own most loyal voters.
Obama has destroyed the lives of the very people who consider him “the
American Idol.”How bad is Obama’s economy? Forget the 7.3 percent
unemployment rate that is reported by the government. That’s pure fraud and
propaganda. That figure goes down only because hundreds of thousands of
Americans drop out of the workforce. In other words, if you stop looking for
work, and go on food stamps and welfare, Obama says the unemployment number
just got better!
The only truth about unemployment is found in the Labor
Force Participation Rate of 63 percent. That’s the lowest in four decades.
For men it’s the lowest since record-keeping began in the 1940’s. What this
means is 37 percent of the able-bodied, working age adults in America are
not only not working, they’ve given up looking for work.
Even worse, a unimaginable percentage of those who are
employed have only part-time jobs. Seventy-seven percent of the new jobs
created since January 1st are part-time jobs. That’s not good folks.
Studies show 1-in-4 part-time workers live in poverty, while only 1-in-20
full-time workers live in poverty. So millions of Americans under Obama who
show up as “employed” are merely working their way towards poverty. And
millions of others who have full-time jobs are working at McDonalds, or
working as waiters, or bartenders, or janitors. Those are the only jobs left
under Obama. The middle class is being slaughtered.
Here are the two most ironic points about this
slow-motion train wreck called the Obama economy: More...
Purposely Trying to Start WW III?
by Wayne Allyn root,
annotated by FM Duck
Aug 29, 2013
Las Vegas, NV -- Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for
Personal Liberty. Two things are happening right now under President
Barack Obama that are unprecedented.
First, Obama is about to go
to war in Syria and risk your sons’ and daughters’ lives on behalf of our
enemy, al-Qaida. Second, he is about to risk starting World War III.
Are you on board?
And then there’s Obama’s
“red line.” Obama’s defenders say, “Syria passed the red line. We have no
choice.” Really? So we now call extremist Muslims killing other extremist
Muslims a “red line” that demands U.S. intervention. But extremist Muslims
in Egypt burning more than 70 churches to the ground and killing Christians
is not a “red line?” In one place (Syria), we want to go to war. In the
other (Egypt), we continue to send billions of dollars in foreign aid as a
reward for killing Christians.
Do you support Obama’s
definition of a “red line?” I know I don’t.
So why the rush to war?
Could it be because America’s unemployment problem under Obama is unfixable?
Ninety million working-age Americans are not working. The labor force
participation rate is the lowest for men since 1947 (since measurement
began). Obama has no way out.
The same holds true for our
partners in the European Union like the United Kingdom and France.
Unemployment for the EU region is 12.1 percent, the worst in history. Almost
20 million Europeans are unemployed. Youth unemployment in the EU is just
below 25 percent.
How do you solve such a
human psychological disaster? You go to war.
Suddenly, young people with no job prospects have a job — in the military.
They have a check, a place to live, something to do. They no longer have
time to commit crimes or riot in the streets.
America got out of the last
Great Depression with the help of World War II. How convenient that Obama
lit the fuse for the Arab Spring, helped to topple dictators friendly to
U.S. interests and took the side of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, it’s all
coming home to roost.
We fomented instability,
supported the radicals who hate America and Israel, and... More...
Illegally Changes ACA, Like Nixon
by George Will,
annotated by FM Duck
Aug 18, 2013
Washington, DC -- Barack
Obama's increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely
proportional to his shriveling presidency.
Desperation fuels arrogance as, barely 200 days into the 1,462 days of his
second term, his pantry of excuses for failure is bare, his domestic agenda
is nonexistent and his foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and
redlines is floundering. And at last week's news conference he offered
as a justification for
his decision to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act, he said: "I
didn't simply choose to" ignore the statutory requirement for beginning in
2014 the employer mandate to provide employees with healthcare. No, "this
was in consultation with businesses." [FM
Duck Note: Really? Businesses? Which businesses qualify to
help justify Obama's breaking of the law? Can Obama change any
provisions or paragraphs of any ol' law he feels like? From where does
he obtain this authority to trash the checks and balances between the three
branches of government. Certainly not from his contract with the
American people, namely the US Constitution.]
continued: "In a normal political environment, it would have been easier for
me to simply call up the speaker and say, you know what, this is a tweak
that doesn't go to the essence of the law . . . it looks like there may be
some better ways to do this, let's make a technical change to the law. That
would be the normal thing that I would prefer to do. But we're not in a
normal atmosphere around here when it comes to Obamacare. We did have the
executive authority to do so, and we did so."
props in the scripted charade of White House news conferences, journalists
did not ask the pertinent question: ... More...
Hit the Road
Barack, I Too Have Become Disillusioned
by Matt Patterson,
Newsweek, annotated by FM Duck
(Written Aug 22, 2012,
that's right, 2012, not today: July 17, 2013)
Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek unload on Obama. As many
of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact
that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the
one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event,
and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President
and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built
around him by the liberal media.
"Not one original idea has ever issued
from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed
over and over again for 100 years," says left Liberal Matt Patterson of
Newsweek. Wow, even the Liberals have now figured it out.
-- FM Duck
Unfortunately, it is now 2013 and President Barack Obama has
been re-elected for another 4 years. If Obama is not the Pied Piper of
America, leading America's youth down the path to serfdom, I don't know who
So much for even the left Liberal news rag Newsweek's influence on the
typical American voter.--
Washington, DC -- Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of
Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a
baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the
Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional
accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's
largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the
world's most consequential job? [FM Duck
Note: From a Libertarian point of view, it is not the President's
function to try to "manage" the economy. That's socialism. It
is, however, the President's job to work with Congress to dump all the state
collectivist legislation that has piled up over the last umpteen hundred
years and get back to a limited government, free market economy. Obama
has, in fact, worsened this problem as he has intervened more into the
market -- thus into individuals' rights and freedoms -- than any other
American President except perhaps FDR and Woodrow Wilson.]
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered
into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores
along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as
a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly
devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an
unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of
which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as
a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations:
the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as
Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as
Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future
historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected
president? [FM Duck
Note: Easy peezy, lemon squeazy: as Ayn Ran would have said, he
obtained the sanction of his altruistic state collectivist victims.]
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed
the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white
candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like
Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have
lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled
in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various
American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard -
because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter
when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said)
"non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the
first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But
certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and
regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and
especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are
not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor
performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if
these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the
emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist
policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a
separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's
affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. [FM Duck
Note: Because that is exactly what American "intellectuals" have
taught Americans to do to themselves.]
True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why
would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for
Columbia [if he really
attended Columbia since nobody there, from students to professors, remember
despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough
for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was
good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his
life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next
step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every
time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive
qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect,
Idea: Spending $7 Billion of our Tax Money on Electric Soccer Balls
by Chicks on The Right,
annotated by FM Duck
(July 02, 2013)
This week, Obama's decided to take $7 Billion
of our hard-earned money and give it to Africa -- in the form of electric
to start by investing $7 billion in
U.S. government resources. ...that's what opportunity looks like."
-- Barack Obama
"No, that's what state
collectivism, socialism, and robbery of the American people looks like." --
He's one innovative dude.
Obama's decided to take $7 Billion of our hard-earned money and give it to
Africa- in the form of electric soccer balls. They're called "socket balls,"
specifically, and they were created by two chicks at Harvard (natch). And
Dear Leader plans on powering Africa with these soccer balls that carry
electric generators inside of them. No lie. Basically, as kids kick them
around all day long, "it
generates electricity and stores it in a battery." And then those kids can
go home and plug something into the ball, like a
phone or a lamp or a hair dryer, or
From the White
House transcript of Obama's speech
proud to announce a new initiative. We’ve been dealing with agriculture,
we’ve been dealing with health. Now we’re going to talk about power -- Power
Africa -- a new initiative that will... More...
Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says Birth Certificate is
by Tim Brown at Freedom
(Jun 09, 2013)
“The answer is, because I am very close to proving Obama to be a criminal,
who absolutely has to be removed from the White House and send (sic) to
prison.” -- Attorney Orly Taitz
Reed Hayes is a court qualified handwriting and
document examiner whose business is located in Honolulu, Hawaii. He has
nearly 40 years of handwriting related experience, and has worked as an
international consultant and speaker. Never heard of him? Well, Hayes is the
Certified Document Examiner (CDE) who produced the 40 page opinion
referenced in the Mike Zullo affidavit that was submitted to the Alabama
Supreme Court in the Obama eligibility case and his report concluded that
the Obama birth certificate image, located at WhiteHouse.gov is a complete
The rabid followers of the “O” (Obots) have
rushed to denounce Reed Hayes as a “quack.” However, one might be
surprised to learn that one of Hayes’ clients listed in the Expert Witness
Directory at this link is an attorney with Perkins-Coie Law Firm.
Perkins – Coie is the law practice whose
partners have provided Obama’s personal defense against all birth
certificate and natural born citizen litigation over the past five years.
Hmmmmm. Very interesting indeed.
If it turns out that Sheriff Arpaio is
successful in getting Congress to investigate the authenticity of Obama’s
BC, the Perkins-Coie legal team, who will be defending Obama, will
be hard pressed to simply dismiss Reed Hayes as a “quack.” This
fact will be especially significant now that it is a revealed and proven
truth that members of the Perkins – Coie firm have used Hayes as an expert
witness! Their own prior cases, where Hayes was used as a witness,
would be severely compromised if they use Saul Alinski-styled mocking
attacks on Hayes.
It has been reported that Mr. Hayes has been
hounded by Obama operatives to discover the details of his 40-page forensic
analysis of the Obama pdf birth certificate. He has been referring them to
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, who now legally own his report,
for further information.
I also found it interesting that someone sided
with the Obama administration and attempted to bring up dirt on Hayes by
pointing out... More...
The Ghost of Columbia University... and then some
by Wayne Allyn Root
(Jun 07, 2013)
Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative
Republican. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee.
There is something more than
just "rotten" in all of the "information" -- or lack thereof -- about Barack
Obama coming out of nowhere, studying nowhere, and becoming President of the
United States. The bigger question is:
or what group,
has created this "Nowhere Man" -- as the Beatles' song indicates -- who
knows nothing, came from nowhere, but seems to be carrying out
One may claim that that would smack of claiming a "conspiracy theory"
against the American people. But let's remember the dictionary
definition of the term "conspiracy:" From the word "conspire,"
to agree together, esp.
secretly, to do something wrong, evil, or illegal... to act or work together
toward the same goal... to plot together toward the same evil or illegal
goal. And thus the
definition of the term
"conspiracy:" the act of conspiring... an evil, unlawful, treacherous,
or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; a plot.
Conspiracies have occurred all throughout history. Conspiracies occur
every day in business, politics, and everywhere. It is only Liberal
politicians who have recently tried to redefine the term "conspiracy" to
mean "untruth" in order to answer unanswerable questions (by them) in a
debate or discussion. That doesn't make real conspiracies not true.
It just means that Liberal politicians don't have -- or are part of the
"conspiracy" themselves -- answers to the conspiracy that is being
discussed. Until a conspiracy is proven to be true, it is just a
theory, a conspiracy theory. But after it is proven to be true, it
still remains as a real conspiracy that occurred. The upshot question
is: are we in the middle of a conspiracy theory with somebody, or
group, playing President Obama like a puppet for some nefarious reasons?
Something truly smells more "rotten" than just Obama's non-attendance at
Columbia University and its cover up. Add to that the fact that
Obama's birth certificate appears to be bogus, too, and that he is guiding
the US into a social-political-economic debacle that will bankrupt the
American and global economy from which known groups (i.e. central bankers,
the military industrial complex, and other groups in Obama's pocket) stand
to rake in billions of dollars, and it is not far-fetched to claim that a
real conspiracy between these groups does indeed exist. -- FM Duck
Other conspiracies have existed
in US history, too. The first Moon landing in 1969 was allegedly
hoaxed by the JFK administration so we could beat the Soviets to a moon
landing as we promised the American public. All subsequent landings,
however -- according to reliable sources -- were true and did occur as
reported. When JFK was contemplating issuing an Executive Order to
stop the Federal Reserve from printing Fed Reserve Notes and going back to
using gold and silver backed currency, he was mysteriously executed in
Dallas and this was blamed on a Lee Harvey Oswald who was then mysteriously
shot by a man who just walked in with the news media while Oswald was being
escorted to jail. How convenient and lax security at the sheriff's
office. Vice President Lynden Johnson then took over and continued the
bankers' war in Vietnam and Federal Reserve Notes continued to be printed.
To this day, we have had nothing but perpetual boogie men set up as
"terrorists" or "bad guys" for the US public to fear so the central bankers
and OPEC oil ministers can continue with their Petro Dollar Deal in the
Mid-East. President Barack Obama may stupidly believe in the Marxist
fairytales he proposes and is trying to implement through programs such as a
national health care joke but he nevertheless did not get to become and
remain as President of the United States without a little help from
a group that is acting or
working together toward an evil, unlawful, treacherous and surreptitious
plan formulated in secret by two or more persons.
Namely, it's a freaking
plot. And now that
he's used the IRS to target his "enemies" -- conservatives, Tea Party
activists, and AP news journalists -- he is gathering all of your private
phone and email communications to use -- not for "national security" -- but
rather against YOU in the near future. Look who he just appointed as
Director for the National Security Agency: former UN Ambassador Susan
Rice who ran around to all the major TV talk shows to lie about an
anti-Allah video produced by some Bozo in Hollywood as the reason for the
terrorist murders of four Americans, including our Ambassador, at our
Benghazi Consulate. Just when we were about to learn that Obama and
Sec of State Hillary Clinton were running guns and missiles to Al Queda by
mistake and were trying to buy them back. Wow. Just a
coincidence? Not part of a bigger conspiracy that Obama is involved
in? Yeah, right... And I got a Golden Gate Bridge you can buy in
San Francisco for five bucks... Uh huh... -- FM Duck
So, let's look at the bigger
picture vis a vis the probable existence of a huge "conspiracy theory" -- a
real one, not the fake definition of "conspiracy theory" by the left
Liberals -- while reading the following from alumnus Wayne Allyn Root, a
former Columbia University classmate of President Barack Obama -- that is,
if Obama actually did attend Columbia University. (Cough-cough, not
likely.) -- FM Duck
I (Wayne Allyn Root) just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th
Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates.
Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual - he wasn’t there. Not even a video
greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse,
no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States
is the ghost of Columbia University.
I’m certainly no “Johnny
come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack
Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying
that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even
seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should
be asking... More...
Employee: D.C. Told Us to Target Tea Party
by Kerry Picket at
(Jun 02, 2013)
IRS Director met with Somebody at the White House 157
times in one year. Remember, one does not just show up to the White
House unannounced for 157 Easter Egg Hunts. The White House INVITES
you to show up, you don't just show up on your own. So the Big
Question is: WHO at the White House INVITED the IRS Director to show
up and for what purpose? It wasn't some junior staff member who felt
like babbling to the IRS Director just for fun. The only plausible
answer is that it was either the Head Honcho himself, Barack Obama, or a
group created by him, in order to make plans on how to target Tea Party and
other Conservative groups RE denying them tax exemptions while readily
granting such exemptions to Democratic groups, AND, to make plans on how to
use the IRS to confiscate AP journalists' personal and professional
communications in a witch hunt allegedly for "National Security" ha ha
"National Security" purposes. And US AG Eric Holder was up to his
eyebrows in this type of targeted behavior. -- FM duck
And the IRS is THE BUREAUCRACY scheduled to enforce
Obamacare? Are we crazy? That's like Adolph Hitler using the
Brown Shirts to enforce national health care in The Third Reich. Oh
well... I guess he did; Welcome to Obamacare in the Third Reich. --
-- House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) revealed new testimony from IRS employees on
CNN's State of The Union on Sunday. According to transcribed
excerpts released by the Committee, a Cincinnati IRS employee made it clear
they were told by Washington, D.C. personnel to give extra scrutiny to Tea
early 2010, was there a time when you became aware of applications that
referenced Tea Party or other conservative groups?
March of 2010, I was made aware.
Okay. Now, was there a point around this time period when [your
supervisor] asked you to do a search for similar applications?
the best of your recollection, when was this request made?
Sometime in early March of 2010.
[your supervisor] give you any indication of the need for the search, any
told me that Washington, D.C., wanted some cases.
as of April 2010, these 40 cases were held at that moment in your group;
is that right?
many were held there?
Less than 40. Some went to Washington, D.C.
Okay. How many went to Washington, D.C.?
you prepared seven hard copy versions of the applications to go to
he give you any sort of indication as to why he requested you to do that?
said Washington, D.C. wanted seven. Because at one point I believe I heard
they were thinking 10, but it came down to seven. I said okay, seven.
did you decide which seven were sent?
Just the first seven.
first seven to come into the system?
anyone else ever make a request that you send any cases to Washington?
[Different IRS employee] wanted to have two cases that she couldn't --
Washington, D.C. wanted them, but she couldn't find the paper. So she
requested me, through an email, to find these cases for her and to send
them to Washington, D.C.
When was this, what time frame?
don't recall the time frame, maybe May of 2010.
just to be clear, she told you the specific names of these applicants.
she told you that Washington, D.C. had requested these two specific
applications be sent to D.C.
Yes, or parts of them.
Okay. So she asked you to send particular parts of these applications.
that was unusual. Did you say that?
she indicated that Washington had requested these specific parts of these
specific applications; is that right? More...
IRS -- and the Income Tax with It
by Sheldon Richman at
Project to Restore America (Annotations by FM Duck)
(May 29, 2013)
[Note by FM Duck: It was not
coincidental that the Internal Revenue Service was created circa 1913-14,
the same time that the Federal Reserve system was created. The same
individuals who concocted our national central bank, The Federal Reserve,
wanted to create an enforcement agency in the government to make sure they
could enforce repayment of all future annual national debts/deficits that
the central bank planned on creating. That enforcement agency was the
IRS and the bankers who created the IRS gave it -- or at least provided for
it to easily obtain in the future -- powers far in excess of what the US
Constitution allowed. The Federal Reserve is not just a friendly bank
that exists to provide a wonderful financial system for the US. It is
a private consortium of the major bankers in the US who have illegally
tricked the dummies in Congress into providing a method by which the bankers
can rob the people of their monetary value while giving Congress the ability
to spend as much deficit money as they want as a method to obtain votes.
The root of all the financial problems in the US, plus the financing of many
wars around the globe, can be directly traced to the existence of our
central bank AND the European Central Bank (ECB). The Petro Dollar
Deal between the Federal Reserve and the OPEC oil ministers is the direct
cause of most of the unrest and the perpetual wars in the Middle East and it
would not be stretching the truth to claim that the current jihad terrorism
is directly related the the actions of the world's central banks. Both
Republicans and Democrats are responsible for allowing the Federal Reserve
AND its enforcement agency, the IRS, to perform all the dirty deeds that
have occurred over the last 100 years of both agencies' existence. The
fact that President Obama and his administration is now caught up in the
same type of IRS harassment issues that many former presidents have used the
IRS for should not come as a surprise to anybody. Nobody at the IRS
needs to be fired or sent to jail. Rather, both agencies -- the IRS
and the Federal Reserve -- need to be abolished. There are better ways
to fund what little the US government should be spending tax money on and we
absolutely do not need the IRS to become part of a national socialist health
care system, that's for damn sure.]
-- The Internal Revenue Service has been caught
engaging in political profiling while processing applications for tax-exempt
status. In this case it was against organizations with "tea-party" or
"patriot " in their names and other right-wing groups. Next time it could be
libertarian or left-wing antiwar and pro-civil-liberties groups. No
dissenter can ever rest assured he is safe from the arbitrary power of the
Nothing will have been learned from this scandal if all that happens is the
firing of some IRS administrators and the issuance of new guidelines on
501(c)(4) applications. That is not nearly enough.
Obviously, tax exemptions exist only because individuals and some
organizations are subject to income and other forms of taxation. Congress
levies a tax on incomes, then in its "wisdom" chooses to exempt certain
activities but not others. This is social engineering, with Congress seeking
to encourage some kinds of organizations — while not forgoing more revenue
than necessary. The IRS then writes rules to carry out the directions of
Where possible, people will naturally strive to qualify
for exemption by pushing the boundaries... More...
Whistleblowers: Stevens Was Involved in Buyback of Stinger Missiles from Al
by Tim Brown at Freedom
Outpost (Summary annotation by FM tl)
(May 23, 2013)
President Obama and Sec
of State Hillary Clinton were, according to new whistleblower sources,
running an international 'Fast and Furious' gun trade with (unwittingly,
e.g. just like what happened with the drug lords in Mexico) Al Qaeda
promised Sec of State Hillary Clinton that he would help her buy back
Stinger Missiles from insurgents after Hillary and Obama discovered the
insurgents to whom they sold the missiles were not freedom fighters but
rather Al Qaeda jihadists. Stevens promised to make the Benghazi
outpost "permanent" vs. "temporary" but was knocked off by the same Al Qaeda
terrorists from whom he, Obama, and Hillary were attempting to recoup the
While this mess was a
State Dept mess, President Obama was the only one who could tell the
military to "stand down" and not send troops to Benghazi to save Ambassador
Stevens. Hillary played along with this game.
General Carter Ham, in
command of US Africa Command (AFRICOM) was ordered not to act to save
Ambassador Stevens. That order, according to CIA Director General
David Patraeus, must come from President Barack Obama, as Commander in
Chief. Patraeus knew the Benghazi raid was done by terrorists and said
so, but to shut him up the Obama Administration spilled the beans about
Patraeus' adulterous relationship with his biographer Paula Broadwell.
In order to cover all
this crap up, President Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton concocted the
Terrorist Fake Movie Fairytale and sent storyteller UN Ambassador Susan Rice
to all the Sunday morning TV talk shows to spread this lie, which has since
been uncovered and revealed on all national news media outlets.
Meanwhile, some poor
Hollywood schmuck "movie producer" sits rotting in jail after being arrested
by the Obama Administration on bogus charges of initiating the Benghazi raid
on our consulate with a YouTube video bashing Allah. And poor little
Hillary hugged the wives of the dead consulate workers while blaming it all
on the "movie." Plus, poor bedraggled Hillary screamed to the
Congressional Investigative Panel words to the effect, "Who gives a crap
what really happened at this point, since they're all dead!"
Guess what, Hilly?
We do. And you just lied to Congress, bitch.
More Benghazi whistleblowers are coming forward according to two former U.S.
diplomats. According to the former diplomats, these whistleblowers are
obtaining legal counsel because they are not protected by whistleblower laws
in the areas that they work in.
reporting of an interview with these diplomats:
diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what
Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put
on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and
therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S.
mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from
al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such
a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had
opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents”
with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats
said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when
it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in
the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the
Could Have Ordered 'Stand Down Call' On Benghazi
by AWR Hawkins at
(May 09, 2013)
-- A source with intimate information
about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S.
Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News
that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting
on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground
or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.
According to the source,
when the attack on the Consulate occurred, a specific chain of command to
gain verbal permission to move special-forces in must have occurred.
SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant Col. Gibson would have contacted...
'Martial Law' Alarms Forensic Profiler
by Bob Unruh
(Mar 25, 2013)
-- A forensic profiler who worked on the
disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the double-murder case against O.J.
Simpson says he is becoming alarmed by some of the references President
Obama is using.
Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who
wrote "The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret
fury," previously said Obama's statement "I am not a dictator"
actualy meant, "I am the dictator president."
Hodges also concluded Obama
unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.
On Hodges's website, Steven
A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston,
Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge
of forensic science.”
“Dr. Hodges’ investigation
of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his
‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact,
becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal
investigators,” wrote Egger.
Hodges is not new to the
field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails,
letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded
Simpson’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder.
He deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in Boulder, Colo., to identify
the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was
about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by
Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of
Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her
daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill
Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
In his newest analysis, he
looks further into Obama’s statements in his press conference about the
sequester issue in which he berated Republicans for not doing what he wants.
Hodges said “another
spontaneous image” appeared from Obama’s “super intelligence.”
“Asked whether he couldn’t
have pushed negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, ‘I can’t
have Secret Service block the doorway,’” Hodges explained
“He suggests the secret wish
to block the Republicans from the door to the government. Failing to
negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush Republicans to gain
total control of the government after the 2014 election. His ‘have Secret
Service’ image further suggests a desire to totally control major government
law enforcement agencies– to block any opposition,” Hodges said.
“The frightening image ‘of
blocking the doorway’ to those who oppose him suggests progressively ideas
of imprisonment/forced containment, and a picture of martial law. Extreme?
Likely so for now but equally a potential major warning of his true intent –
if everything fell into place,” he said.
But Hodges noted objective
actions that fit the pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6
billion rounds of ammunition, the estimated 145,000 federal agents with
firearm- carry authority and the 65,000 agents for the Department of
Homeland Security alone.
Then, he said, there’s the
report that a Minnesota company was selling to the federal government cutout
targets “designed to ‘desensitize police’ to ‘nontraditional threat
The targets included
pregnant women, children, older people and other civilians in neighborhood
settings – all holding guns. The company reported law enforcement designed
and ordered the targets.
“In your wildest
imagination, who in law enforcement needs desensitization to such targets?
Hodges noted that even
activists on the left have expressed concern. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of
the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio interview with host Aaron
Klein, called the potential abuse by the Obama administration’s huge
domestic police power “extremely troubling.”
“Recall Obama’s earlier
words which, importantly, he made spontaneously, strongly pointing toward an
unconscious confession. ‘We’ve got to have a civilian national security
force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the
Congress Must Reach Deal On budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then
April 20, And Then April 28, And then May 1
And Then Twice A Week For
Next Four Years
by The Onion
(Mar 11, 2013)
-- With the dramatic, across-the-board
sequestration scheduled to occur this week, the nation’s leading economists
have warned that President Obama and Congress must come to a compromise on
the budget by Mar. 1, and then again by Apr. 1, and then Apr. 20, Apr. 28,
and—after Congress is once again unable to come to a comprehensive agreement
to fully stabilize the economy—May 1, along with agreements twice a week,
every week, for the next four years.
Experts say that without
reaching a deal this Friday, the automatic $85 billion reduction in
government spending will immediately slow the U.S. economy and impact
thousands of middle-class citizens. Officials said the same exact thing will
happen next month, the month after that, and the month after that if Obama
and Congress fail to meet deadlines created by the preceding, incomplete
“If the president and
Congress are unable to reach a grand bargain by Mar. 1, what they will
likely do is reach a set of 100 or so smaller bargains, all with their own
deadlines, and all of which could potentially plunge the U.S. economy into a
recession,” said Princeton economics professor Marshall Kahn. “So, the Mar.
1 deadline is absolutely crucial. Just like the one next month will be. And
the 12 deadlines in May. And the bi-daily deadlines that will kick in during
“Based on the way the
president and Congress deal with one another,” Kahn added, “in 2014, there
will need to be 4,562 budget deals.”
According to leading
economists, should negotiations between Obama and lawmakers stall this week,
Congress could vote on a resolution to extend the current deadline to May 1,
which would likely cause vital cuts to public programs, and also combine the
projected negotiations scheduled for May 30, June 4, June 5, July 8, 2014,
and Mar. 12, 2042 into one seven-day-long meeting.
Other experts noted that
even in the event of a deal, a clause in the Budget Control Act would
inevitably lead to a total of 64 additional meetings between June and July,
as well as a potential deadline creation deadline that would automatically
kick in on Oct. 4 and would create 20 more deadlines that... More...
The Sequester 'Crisis' and What
Should Be Done
by former US Rep Ron
(Mar 06, 2013)
-- Despite what the media and politicians would
have us believe, the United States did not collapse last Friday when the
package of spending reductions known as “sequestration” went into effect.
The financial markets hardly blinked, as they have come to be more skeptical
about these periodic government-hyped “crises.”
What had been portrayed as a
drastic reduction in government spending was merely a decrease in the
projected rate of increase in government spending over the next decade.
Under sequestration, government spending increases by $2.4 trillion over the
next 10 years rather than $2.5 trillion without it.
So we are speeding toward
collapse at only 100 miles per hour instead of 110 miles per hour.
Some in Congress are using
the panic over sequestration to justify another surrender of legislative
authority to the executive branch. These members want to “pass the buck” on
prioritizing federal programs by giving the president, cabinet officials,
and high-level bureaucrats authority to set spending priorities. However, it
is Congress’s job to set priorities in federal spending.
The drafters of the
Constitution give the legislature the authority over spending because they
recognized it was a threat to liberty to allow this power to be concentrated
in the executive branch. Congress’s willingness to cede more authority to
the executive should be opposed by everyone who values liberty and limited
Some of the loudest
objections to sequestration have come from the champions of the
military-industrial complex. Yet under sequestration defense spending will
still increase by 18 percent over 10 years as opposed to 20 percent without
There are claims that the
military will face a... More...
Balances On a Sea of Debt
Mar 06, 2010
“The banks that control the world’s supply of money are no better than
counterfeiters – and their systems of juggling debt have left the global
economy teetering on the brink of ruin.”--
Darius Guppy, convicted Dutch counterfeiter
The following article aptly describes how fractional reserve banking is
simply another form of counterfeiting, pointing out the conceptual
difference between (1) real money and (2) a paper receipt for real money.
Then as the counterfeiting by fractional reserve bankers grows
exponentially, as it must, the central bankers – witness former Federal
Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan as he embraces the erroneous concept that he
can impute value to paper money per se -- start believing in their own
monetary lies and create even more complicated counterfeit investment
vehicles backed by nothing but hot air, such as fake mortgage-backed
securities, collateralized debt obligations based upon non-collateralized
future daydreams, and then gambling pieces of paper called Credit Default
Swaps whose clever function consists of betting against the
previously-created fractional reserve derivatives. That’s like a
counterfeiter soliciting bets that the cops will soon catch him at his
counterfeiting activities, in order to mitigate his losses. So, the
investment bankers at Goldman Sachs who sit on the board of Governors of the
Fed Reserve sell fractional reserve hedge fund derivatives to clients while
down the hall they short their clients’ very same hedge funds with Credit
Default Swaps, betting that their hedge funds will fail. That’s worse than
prostitutes who only make their money going in; the bankers make their money
both going in and pulling it , continues until they can’t keep it up any longer and the market crashes and
burns. Not to worry. It’s called a Recession, then a Depression
as everybody points fingers at everybody else and the bankers blame it on a
“systemic risk,” or the U.S. Congress who is also participating in this
monetary gang bang, or the vagaries of a non-existent free market capitalism,
or a mysterious virus from Mars.
– FM Duck
“If I could counterfeit the Pink Slip to my ’57 Chevy and sell a million
copies to the suckers in my neighborhood for $1,000 each, while replacing
’This is to Certify that There Exists One ’57 Chevy on Deposit at FM Duck’s
Warehouse Payable to the Bearer of This Note on Demand’
’Virtual Non-Existent Car,’I could make a fortune. And that’s exactly what the Federal Reserve is
doing with fractional reserve banking of the U.S. Dollar and going off the
gold standard.” – FM Duck
Europe – In 1994, there resided in the cell next to mine a certain “Tommy”.
He had been imprisoned for counterfeiting Dutch Guilders to such a high
standard that he had fooled the banks themselves.
customary among prisoners who became friends, Tommy allowed me to read his
legal papers and I became fascinated by the judge’s sentencing speech, the
gist of which was that his activities had been parasitical. By creating
money out of thin air he had reduced the purchasing power of more deserving
members of society. What would happen if everyone behaved like him?
of arguments used, in a different context, regarding inflation. Like
counterfeiting, it dilutes the value of the community’s wealth and
constitutes a social evil. Creating too much money – “real” or “fake” – can
wreck an economy. Such was the Nazis’ reasoning when they planned to ruin
Britain’s economy by flooding the country with near-perfect counterfeit
A lot of
nonsense has been written about the world’s current economic woes – about
how the crash is the fault solely of the banks and, by implication,
governments are blameless; and how it could all have been avoided, and can
be put right, by greater financial regulation.
It is a
classic example of what the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre terms “the
fallacy of managerial expertise”: an attempt by “experts” to blind us with
science to justify their overpaid existences and mask their confusion. After
all, not one of them was able to predict the current debacle.
“experts” will tell you that the present difficulties are simply the result
of abuses and excesses in a system that is basically sound. All that is
required is for some faults to be corrected. Do not believe them. The
reality is that the problem is systemic and a little tinkering here or there
will achieve nothing in the long term.
needed is a root-and-branch re‑evaluation of that most curious of cultural
inventions, money: how it is created, how it circulates, and how it can best
be used to serve the interests of the community.
the experts must explain in the simplest terms how money actually works.
Were one to ask the man on the street – or, indeed, most politicians and
bankers – who creates the money that rules our lives they would reply “the
State”. They would be wrong. It is true that governments create legal tender
– the physical notes and coins that circulate in an economy – but that
represents, at its highest, only 3 per cent of the total money in
circulation in the global economy. It is the commercial banks, largely
unaccountable and privately owned, that create the world’s money.
even if Tommy were responsible for printing every note in circulation
throughout the world his power to dilute the rest of our wealth would amount
to only a tiny fraction of that of the real manufacturers of money. His
activities and the activities of the bankers are, in essence, identical: the
creation of money out of nothing.
knowing it, therefore, Tommy’s judge punished him for usurping not so much
the role of the State as the role of the banks. The same mistake – the mis-identification
of where money truly originates – has been made by virtually all of our
politicians, economists and financial commentators.
the contradiction at the heart of neo-liberal, monetarist economics that has
constituted the Western orthodoxy for the past few decades: to emphasize on
the one hand that the money supply should be brought under control while
simultaneously allowing banking – where the money is actually manufactured –
to run riot.
how the global fraud works we need to step back in time and imagine
ourselves next to the original goldsmith-banker.
vault, 10 of his customers each deposit a bar of gold... More...
2nd Inaugural Address; Obama
Declares War on Liberty as We Know It
by Joel B. Pollak,
(Jan 21, 2013)
"But we have
always understood that when times change, so must we; that
fidelity to our founding principles requires new
responses to new challenges; that
preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action."
-- President Barack Obama
Notice that Barack Obama doesn't
understand -- or doesn't want YOU to understand -- that PRINCIPLES, by
definition, do not change over time. That's why they're called
principles, like the Law of Identity, the Law of Cause and Effect, Do Unto
Others, the 10 Commandments, the laws of physics, etc. And namely, the
US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Therefore, preserving our
individual freedoms DOES NOT REQUIRE a change to "collective action" --
which is Obama's Marxist code word for state collectivism, better known as
Sounding the same themes of class warfare that propelled his re-election
campaign, President Barack Obama devoted his second inaugural address to
laying out his second term agenda: a struggle to undo the seeming injustices
of America's past, and to overcome the army of
straw men (Obama's and Karl Marx's continual fiction) that stand
in opposition to progress.
In the process, President
Obama attempted nothing less than an assault on the
timeless notion of liberty itself:
"Through it all, we
have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we
succumbed to the fiction that all society's ills can be cured through
But we have always
understood that when times change, so must we; that
fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new
challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms
ultimately requires collective action."
After praising the
"collective" and mocking the notion that America is a "nation of takers,"
President Obama targeted the political opposition. He targeted those who
"deny" climate change, attacked those who allegedly refused to reward the
elderly for their contributions, and defied critics whom he said wanted
"perpetual war." He attacked the rich--as he has done so often over the past
four years--and painted a caricature of an unjust nation: "...our country
cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely
make it....We do not believe that in this country, freedom is reserved for
the lucky, or happiness for the few."
President Obama's address
failed to deliver on promises earlier in the day by senior political adviser
David Axelrod that the speech would sound themes of national unity on a day
of national "consecration." Instead, the president sounded combative themes
familiar from his divisive first term, albeit wrapped occasionally in the
lofty rhetoric of "hope" and "tolerance," and punctuated by the repeated
refrain: "We, the People."
He acknowledged Americans
have diverse concepts of liberty, but insisted that these could all fit
together under the collective mission of the government to achieve its
redistributive aims. Days after describing Republicans as... More...
"Zero Dark Thirty," Real or Fake
Extraction of Osama bin Laden?
(Jan 13, 2013)
is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from
reality. By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US
really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?
about it. The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"
-- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a
suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.
What? Pakistan is going to say, "No?"
Washington, DC / Hollywood, CA
-- The movie, Zero Dark Thirty, debuted yesterday and I dashed
down to the Regal Cinema 22 to see it. Did not read the book, which is
out in hard back under a different title than Zero Dark Thirty. Forgot
the book title but you can't miss it at the book store or at Amazon on line.
The book was written by one of the Navy SEALs who participated in the
extraction -- more like the straightforward shooting, the execution -- of
Osama bin Laden at his hideout in Pakistan in some city called gobbledegook-bad.
All cities in Pakistan end in three letters: "bad."
something very unnerving about this whole episode of knocking off UBL -- Usama bin
Laden -- that occurred in 2011. It just doesn't pass the
smell test. Let's look at the basic facts.
The US government
claims they didn't know where UBL was hiding out for 10 years. Was it
in a cave in Afghanistan? A hut in whoopteedoobad? The Marriott
at Disneyland? Then, some CIA babe deduces -- after a lot of
water-boarding and other big time American torture -- that UBL was living in
a compound less than a mile from Pakistan's equivalent -- ha ha, equivalent
-- of America's West Point Military Academy in gobbledegook-bad.
is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from
reality. By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US
really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?
about it. The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"
-- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a
suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.
What? Pakistan is going to say, "No?"
All the Pakistanis have to
do in broad daylight is to invite the occupants of the suspicious compound
outside for a cup of tea while both Pakistan -- our "ally,"
ho ho -- and the
US military quickly search the suspected UBL compound to determine whether
bin Laden lives there or not. It's really simple. And, hesto presto, if UBL is found hiding in
the laundry basket or microwave oven, or under the lawn mower in the compound, then the US military and Pakistan
arrests the dude and that's that. If not, offer apologies to the head
of household, dole out another billion dollars to Pakistan, and offer a free
round of Bud Lites, courtesy of Barack Obama.
Is that what happened? Nooooo. Instead, the US CIA and Barack Obama... More...
Marriage Tax Penalties in "Fiscal Cliff" Taxes
(Jan 02, 2013)
President Obama promised
to sign legislation to allow gay marriage; then he signed a new tax law that
penalizes married couples.
-- The US Congress just passed a new law that
increases the taxes of all Americans in many areas of the tax code. The new bill does
nothing to cut spending. And the new bill does not address our
out-of-control deficit, now at $17 trillion. Nor does it address our
looming debt ceiling.
But let's take a gander at a couple of the unintended tax
consequences that Congress and President Obama just foisted upon all married
couples. That consequence is what's known as "The Marriage Penalty
Remember in the old days when inflation was only trotting
along instead of galloping like it is today, and your IRS 1040 Tax Return
listed exemptions or deductions for single and married couples? The
deduction for a married couple was not double the deduction for a single
person. In other words, it was more advantageous, tax-wise, for
married couples to get a divorce and just live together as man and wife in
order to double their tax deductions and exemptions.
This same anomaly -- called a Marriage Penalty Tax -- was
stupidly passed in at least three sections of yesterday's House and
Senate-approved "Fiscal Cliff" tax bill and President Obama will now sign
off on this encouragement-to-get-a-divorce tax.
What are the new tax snafus that will penalize married
Snafu # 1: Income tax rates have now been increased
from 35% to 39.6% for individuals earning over $400K, $450K for a married
couple. That means your spouse is only worth $50K for tax sheltering
purposes. Hey, get a divorce, live together and your total tax
deduction will be $800K. Ironically, Congress' new "Fiscal Cliff" tax
law encourages divorce. If you are a small business filing as a sole
proprietor, it may be very important to you to shelter $800,000...
Karl Marx Award
Worst Piece of U.S. Legislation
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare,
has been the worst piece of US legislation since the passage of the Federal
Reserve Act. Rolling out on the web site called
www.healthcare.gov in Oct 2013,
Obamacare immediately crashed and burned. 6 million individuals have
lost their current health care plans due to the mandates in Obamacare that
forced insurance providers to cut current plans in order to comply with the
provisions of Obamacare. Essentially nobody has actually signed up for
Obamacare yet because the payment subroutine in the software system for
healthcare.gov has not been written. And nobody told the public about
that fact. So, come Jan 1, 2014, there will be individuals -- thank
God not too many because nobody could get through all the crash and burn
error messages on the online sign up screens for Obamacare -- who will find
out at their doctor's office that they are NOT covered for health insurance.
Surprise! As we go into 2014 and the employer sign up mandates go into
effect, it is estimated that some 80 million individuals will lose their
health care insurance as small businesses find it cheaper to cut their
employee coverage than pay double and triple their current employee health
insurance rates. The only hope for the US is that Obamacare will
continue to be the most expensive government flop ever -- costing some 680
million dollars just for the web site costs alone -- and this pernicious
piece of punitive legislation will be abolished by a newly elected slate of
Tea Party and Conservative majority in the 2014 Congress.