Idaho's Weekly Journal of Local & National Commentary Week 2815


Home • About us • Contact • Glossary • Links • Quack Off


 Commentary  &  Opinion 

     Quack Off    



by Free Market Duck

(Note: To contact FM Duck, please send email to  To prevent spam, please insert the word Quack Off in your email's subject line.  Thanks.)

US Stupidly Sends Klingons a Road Map Back to Planet Earth  More...

Media Hide Facts, Calls Everyone Else a Liar  More...

Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say that Jeb Bush is Retarded?  More...

Obama Staged Fake Zero Dark Thirty Raid to Knock Off bin Laden?  More...

Bergdahl to be Charged with Desertion  More...

Generals Conclude Obama Backed Al-Qaida  More...

Not "Je Suis Charlie," But "Je Suis Socialist"  More...

President Obama Falsely Yells "Fire!" in a Crowded Theatre   More...

Prez Obama Urges Public to Not Riot in Fergusen Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San Francisco, Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise Idaho and All Major Cities in America   More...

Emperor Obama Issues Pink Slips to US Congress  More...

Who Really Killed Osama bin Laden?  More...

Is Sgt Bergdahl Obama's Last Hurrah?  More...

Why I Do Not Like the Obamas  More...

So, Just How Bad Was This Super Bowl Rout, Historically Speaking?  More...

The Lost Century  More...

The Magnificent Failure of ObamaCare  More...

"James Bond's dirty little spy secret:  He's an alcoholic," says Dr. No research team from Nottingham University Hospitals in England  More...

Nelson Mandela: In His Own Words  More...

Nelson Mandela: A Man of Peace or a Terrorist Commie?  More...

What Obama and I Learned at Columbia:  How to Destroy America from Within  More...

The Big Cover Up -- Why Obama Really Wants to go to War in Syria  More...

Is Obama Purposely Trying to Start WW III?  More...

Barack Obama Illegally Changes ACA, Like Nixon  More...

Hit the Road Barack, I Too Have Become Disillusioned  More...

Obama's New Idea: Spending $7 Billion of our Tax Money on Electric Soccer Balls for Africa  More...

Bombshell:  Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says Birth Certificate is 100% Fraud  More...

Barack Obama:  Ghost of Columbia University... and then some  More...

IRS Employee:  D.C. Told Us to Target Tea Party  More...

Abolish the IRS -- and the Income Tax with it  More...

New Benghazi Whistleblowers: Stevens Was Involved in Buyback of Stinger Missiles from Al Qadeda  More...

Only Obama Could Have Ordered 'Stand Down Call' On Benghazi  More...

Picture of 'Martial Law' Alarms Forensic Profiler  More...

Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On Budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And Then May 1  More...

The Sequestier 'Crisis" and What Should Be Done  More...

Our World Balances on a Sea of Debt…  More...

2nd Inaugural Address; Obama Declares War on Liberty as We Know It  More...

"Zero Dark Thirty," Real or Fake Extraction of Osama bin Laden?  More...

Obama/Congress Implement Marriage Tax Penalties in "Fiscal Cliff" Taxes  More...

Darth Vader Arrested for Bringing "Fiscal Cliff" to Earth  More...

Just Say "NO!" to Idaho's State Health Care Exchange  More...

How Big is a Trillion Dollars?  More...

What the hell is a "job?"  More...

National Socialism Defeats Individual Rights in 2012 Presidential Elections  More...

Public School Employment Far Outpacing K-12 Student Enrollment  More...

"2016: The Movie"  More...

Robert Barro:  Ryan and the Fundamental Economic Debate  More...

Romney Care 2.0  More...

Why Capitalism Has An Image Problem  More...

The Incredible Bain Job Machine  More...

Martial Law By Executive Order  More...

President Obama, "Tax the Rich!"  More...

Complexity is Bad for your Health  More...

WinderCare Tramples Upon Women's Private Property Rights  More...

Liberty and ObamaCare  More...

ObamaCare's Flawed Economic Foundations  More...

The Education Games  More...

The Hunger Games  More...

Feds Redefine Pizza as a Vegetable  More...

2012: The Obama-Romney Presidential Debates  More...

The Federal Reserve's Covert Bailout of Europe  More...

Forget Britain's David Cameron Veto, Another Eurozone Crisis is Only Weeks Away  More...

How Does Europe Borrow Dollars from the Fed?  More...

Fix Was In:  The Stock Market Was Rigged  More...

European Ponzi Goes Full Retard as EFSF Found to Monetize... Itself  More...

Public School Teachers Aren't Underpaid  More...

Hell Explained by a Chemistry Student  More...

Understanding Derivatives and The Bailout  More...

The European Crisis  More...

Default Now, or Suffer a More Expensive Crisis Later  More...

Obama Offers Israeli PM Pork Chops Laced with Cyanide  More...

Budget cuts are meaningless without Federal Reserve transparency  More...

Old Nuclear News Revisited in the next 2 articles written three years ago at FM Duck and even more applicable today since Japan's recent nuclear catastrophe:

Idaho Legies create Perfect Storm:  yellowcake plus Yellowstone plus Snake Plain Aquifer equals radioactive Super Volcanic blast  More...

Gov Butch Otter signs corporate welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for Perfect Nuclear Storm:  a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie  More...

A Union Education...or
What Wisconsin reveals about public workers and political power 

Idaho Statesman claims "nullification" of Obamacare is "immoral"  More...

What is the Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 3 of 3  More...

What is the Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 2 of 3  More...

What is the Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 1 of 3  More...

Toward Sensible Monetary Policy  More...

What's wrong with our current Education System?  A Libertarian Discussion that asks, "What is Education?"  ... and better yet, what should Education Be?  More...

WikiLeaks 1941  More...

Billions Flushed Down Political Toilet in Afghanistan  More...

How many different U.S. Governments are busy running America?  More...

Financial Reckoning Day  More...

Idaho on the Verge of Bankruptcy in 2012  More...

New silver class action invokes RICO against JP Morgan, HSBC  More...

Idaho Voters, Who Should You Vote For... and Which Amendments?  More...

Federal Reserve Commits Treason as it Asks 18 Major Banks How Much Money They Want the Fed to Give Them to “Stimulate” the Economy:  $250 Billion, $500 Billion, $1 Trillion, $2 Trillion or More…  More...

545 People  More...

Central banks create $4.7 trillion mortgage foreclosure debacle with fractional reserve monetary concepts  More...

Idaho Voters Asked to Vote Away Their Rights to Vote... Huh?  More...

Obama's Three Economic Fallacies..., or
Why He Doesn't Get It 

Socialist Double Speak: Why Aren't Boise's Sales Tax Exemptions Considered a Stimulus to the Economy?  More...

Energy - Part 3 of 3
Why Are We Still Drilling for Oil When We have Tesla's Free Radiant Energy? 

U.S. Government Mint to Sell Jr. Federal Printing Presses to U.S. Citizens…  More...

Boise's Ada County Detox Center Bankrupt Within One Year as Cities Refuse to Cough Up the Dough to Pay for it…  More...

Energy - Part 2 of 3
The Asteroid Belt and How It Got there After the Planet Phaeton Blew up... Will History Repeat itself?… 

Energy - Part 1 of 3
BP's Quest for Time
The Well from Hell... and What They're Not Saying… 

Carbs against Cardio…  More...

$145 Billion and Counting…  More...

The One Thing…  More...

The difference between sound money and our current pulp fiction Dollar, or...why Idaho Legislators should vote "yes" on House Bills 622 and 633…  More...

California Grinds to a Halt as Public and Private Unions Strike Against the State's Plans to Cut Spending and Raise Taxes…  More...

Our World Balances on a Sea of Debt…  More...

Wall Street's Bailout Hustle…  More...

European Central Bankers Poised to Take Over Europe…  More...

Secret Banking Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows…  More...

ObamaCare is not about health care; it’s about control and profits.  Oddly enough, it’s not the insurance companies; it’s the central bankers…  More...

Boise Trolley Folly DOES Justify Legislative Intervention  More...

Federal Reserve to Switch to New "Scratch 'N Sniff" Currency  More...

New Government Health Care Plan Struggling to Find "Single Payer" Name  More...

Jesus appoints Obama as "Associate Christ"  More...

Has Congress become an anachronism?  More...

Leftist Boise Mayor Dave Bieter in secret meetings to blow $560 million of federal welfare dollars on downtown Boise streetcar named “Desire”… or is that a streetcar named “Huge Deficit?” More...

Hey, kids, got game?  Got rap?  Wanna be a rich movie star?  “That isn’t hard work,” says Obama, “and chances are you ain’t gonna be any of those things.”  More...

"Obama's speech to schools:  what civics lesson will parents teach their kids?”  More...

Two Governors Bankrupt Idaho's Highways, or Who let the GARVEE bonds out?  More...

"National" health care?  Stop thinking in terms of "collectives," we are individuals  More...

Fed Reserve, America's legal counterfeiting ring   More...

Off Balance Sheet, Out of Mind  More...

National Health Care is illogical  More...

Idaho Congressmen introduce Federal Streetcar Revitalization Act of 2009…ask for $300 Million to build streetcars across America…$65 Million for Boise  More...

Idaho Statesman supports spending $65 million of federal stimulus booty for Boise Trolley Cars  More...

Idaho Statesman thinks socialist economics can enrich economy and create Idaho jobs  More...

The Idaho Transportation Solution  More...

B of A CEO ordered by Fed Reserve and U.S. Treasury to shut up about Merrill Lynch's billion dollar losses   More...

Failed $250 Million University Place fiasco participant, Bob Hoover, named as president of the Idaho Community Foundation  More...

More Voo-Doo Economics: "Good Bank, Bad Bank"  More...

The Great "Stimulus" Hoax  More...

Why President Obama’s Trillion Dollar “Stimulus” Package is Unconstitutional – Part 2  More...

Why President Obama’s Trillion Dollar “Stimulus” Package is Unconstitutional – Part 1  More...

Petition of the Electric Light Bulb Manufacturers  More...

Obama parties down at most expensive Inauguration in history -- over $170 million -- as U.S. falls further into huge Recession  More...

Is The Medicine Worse Than the Illness?  More...

Idaho Statesman prints insightful Reader’s View by young economist, “Don’t fall for the Big 3’s doomsday predictions – they’re unlikely”  More...

Did U.S. Attorney Fitzgerald jump the gun in premature arrest of Gov. Blagojevich?  More...

Idaho Statesman editors publish whitewash of Weatherman bomber Bill Ayers to save Barack Obama…
then, up pops the FBI and Illinois Gov. Blagojevich…

Idaho Statesman parent McClatchy confuses socialism with free market  More...

Victoria's Secret Reorgs as Savings & Loan Bank, Qualifies for Treasury's $700 Billion Bailout Booty  More...

Stable Money Is the Key to Recovery  More...

Is America on the verge of electing a socialist Islamic terrorist supporter as U.S. President?  More...

U.S. bankers whine for 30 seconds, kiss Godfather Paulson’s ass, then sign off on bank nationalization  More...

‘Toys R Us’ offers to bail out U.S. economy with
injection of $700 Trillion in cash from Parker Bros. Monopoly Game…
Sweetens deal by throwing in Marvin Gardens

Recession 2008: The blind leading the blind  More...

Congressman Ron Paul's answer to President Bush's $700 Billion bailout   More...

Sec of Treasury Paulson suspends U.S. Constitution, anoints himself Wizard of Oz, demands $700 billion to unclog nation’s toilets…
Will Congress assume Dying Cockroach Position?

Money, money everywhere, nor any drop to drink...
U.S. Dollar is pulp fiction

Weekend at Fannie's  More...

Idaho Statesman pushes Fascist Business Model as “Vision for the Valley”  More...

Look out!
Pistol Packing Mama, Gov Sarah Palin, blasts her way into the Republican National Convention...
accepts VP slot with John McCain 

McCain chooses Idahoan Sarah Palin, a moose-hunting, fisher-babe, free market Governor of Alaska, as Vice Prez running mate on GOP ticket  More...

Idaho stockpiles $500 million to $1 billion tax surplus on top of last year's $224 million surplus?  More...

Washington politicians lie about true size of budget deficit  More...

Corporate Welfare Alive and Well in Idaho  More...

"Covered Bonds" new mortgage gimmick by "Banksta Gangsta" Treasury Sec Hank Paulson  More...

History of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reveal gross corruption, fundamental flaws  More...

Zimbabwe inflation hits 1,000,000% per year…
Government central bank issues new $50 Billion denomination notes as paper currency becomes worthless 

Idaho Supreme Court enforces socialist health care law…
Taxpayers must cough up $187,000 for illegal immigrant’s heart attack 

Obama-Clinton “nightmare ticket” promises to drag U.S. down the road to serfdom via Marxist socialism  More...

Idaho Pub Ed System Run by Village Idiots?...
State Board Asks Feds to Restart Failure Clock for “No Child Left Behind” Program 

Kempthorne Hugs Polar Bears, Bankrupts America  More...

Yeah, Kempthorne, "Cough up" those gubernatorial records, will ya?  More...

Idaho:  nuclear waste dump of America  More...

2008 Legislative Report Card for Idaho: F-minus More...

Fed scientists discover new element in Periodic Table of Elements:  Paper  More...

Gov Butch Otter signs corporate welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for Perfect Nuclear Storm:  a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie  More...

Who Killed the U.S. Dollar?  More...

Prescription for Prosperity:  A Comprehensive Economic Revitalization Plan   More...

03-13-2008 Revised
Idaho Grocery Tax Rebate to equal 9/10 of 1% of your grocery bill?... Ooooh, Whoop-tee-doo, Governor  More...

Idaho Grocery Tax Rebate to equal 3/10 of 1% of your grocery bill?... Ooooh, Whoop-tee-doo, Governor  More...

Idaho Legies create Perfect Storm:  yellowcake plus Yellowstone plus Snake Plain Aquifer equals radioactive Super Volcanic blast  More...

Parliament of Whores admonishes one of their own  More...

Anybody Seen Our Gold?  More...

(Updated 02-14-2008)
GOP and Liberal Disconnected Thought Globs (DTGs) dominate 2008 presidential debates  More...

Earmarks for Idaho are good but earmarks for Alaska are bad, says Idaho Statesman  More...

Smoke 'n Mirrors Economic Stimulus Package:  $600 for you, $730,000 for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac  More...

The Paper Chase:  Dollar becomes pulp fiction as Fed injects trillions into the market... But Dollar is not real capital, thus cannot stimulate economy  More...

Federal Reserve drives U.S. into Super Recession, then Depression, then Martial Law  More...

New Thought Police Bill passes U.S. House 404-6, awaits Senate vote  More...

U.S. Federal Reserve Note:  America's Pulp Fiction  More...

Who shot Pakistani ex Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto?  More...

Idaho Congress-crooks Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig and Rep Mike Simpson rob all Americans for Idaho earmarks More...

Goldman Sachs creates subprime slime with left hand, shorts subprime slime with right hand More...

Ada County to operate Detox Center for drunks & dopers?  Cost to taxpayers: $1.8 million per year  More...

Central Banks Conspire to Hyper-Inflate Global Economy  More...

Boise's Watergate fiasco continues as Univ of Idaho plans to blow $300 million on new marketing campaign  More...

Why should Boise's "Special Olympics" be funded by taxpayer earmarks and what is the true concept behind the "Special Olympics?"  More...

President Bush, Sec of Treasury Paulson save America's subprime home bet... Just Call Hotline to Mortgage Heaven: 1-888-995-HOPE  More...

U.S. Treasury to Bail Out Billionaire Bankers on Wall Street Under Guise of Saving Subprime Borrowers  More...

Idaho Gov Butch Otter Holds Secret Meeting to Tax Inner Tubes on Boise River  More...

Idaho's Property Tax Solution  More...

The Fed's "Prime Interest Rate" Joke  More...

Idaho Statesman's parent McClatchy posts $1.4 billion loss in 3rd Qtr  More...

The AMT - Worst Piece of U.S. Tax Legislation  More...

What is The Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit?  Hint: It's not a plastic flex straw to a bottle of Ripple wine  More...

Can Idaho U.S. Senator Larry Craig be recalled?  More...

How to Recall Idaho U.S. Senator Larry Craig  More...

Will the real $50 please stand up?  More...

President Bush and Federal Reserve bankers plan for nationwide bankruptcy with fake 3-week flu test  More...

Idaho to implement ButchCare?  More...

Wherein lies the value of today's paper money?... The solution:  abolish fractional reserve central banking, the Federal Reserve and govt monopoly of money; allow private minting and free choice of currencies - Part 5  More...

Wherein lies the value of today's paper money?... The problem:  unconstitutional  Federal Reserve plays Quantitative Economics (as if econ is physics) rather than Qualitative Economics, which is based upon individual rights and freedom - Part 4  More...

Wherein lies the value of today's paper money?... Derivative markets now exceed half a quadrillion dollars or $500,000,000,000,000 of non-collateralized paper - Part 3  More...

Wherein lies the value of today's paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending recession - Part 2  More...

Wherein lies the value of today's paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending recession - Part 1  More...

Boise's Toiletgate morphs into Pinocchio-gate as Senator Craig's nose mysteriously grows another 2 feet overnight  More...

Senator Larry Craig did not resign and hired two lawyers, 1 for the Ethics Committee and 1 for the Minneapolis men's room debacle   More...

Senator Larry Craig's abuse of power & lame excuses are symptomatic of long list of GOP political abuses in Idaho - Part 1  More...

J'accusse, Mr. Federal Reserve did it with the Candlestick, the Rope, the Revolver, the Knife, the Wrench, and the Lead Pipe in the House, the Senate, the University, and Wall Street  More...

Ada County Commissioners condemn own property through eminent domain...
Pay Cryptic Partners $3.2 million in fake "takings" - Part 1 

Central bankers redefine "hyper-inflation" as "liquidity"... Inject over $326,000,000,000 into global economy to stave off stock market crash & recession  More...

NY Stock Market crashes 387 points as sub-prime fiasco hits Germany, France  More...

WSJ, Fox News pretend Ron Paul votes for earmarks  More...

"The Fix" is still in, new community college trustees interview only 1 person for Prez... and guess what?  He got the job!  More...

Harry Potter dies on page 597... in Boise  More...

"The fix was in... But that's OK; This case warranted an inside job." -- Dan Popkey, Idaho Statesman  More...

Is the War in Iraq a Mafia-style protection racket: U.S. military protects OPEC and OPEC promises to use only inflated petro-dollars?  More...

Ex Ada County Commish Judy Peavey-Derr threatens libel lawsuit against Deep Throat II More...

Idaho Senator Craig loses Illegal Immigration Amnesty bill...Does Craig support prison inmates picking Idaho crops? More...

U.S. Constitution not signed by authors  More...

"Bong Hits 4 Jesus"  More...

Court transcripts reveal judge knows University Place fiasco was a financial scam and who the perps were More...

Cheap Community College "need" is a hoax...BSU rated cheapest university in the nation by US News & World Report More...

Ada County screws taxpayers, again...pays Cryptic Partners $1.4 million for $900,000 office space in Eminent Domain settlement  More...

NO campaign thanks YES campaign for abuse of Absentee Ballots, encourages re-vote by mail  More...

Scientists slap Bible Bangers' definition of "when does life begin" upside their diploid totipotent cells  More...

What is America's greatest moral challenge?  More...

Yo, Rudy, follow the money  More...

What is paper money? More...

Sec of Interior Kempthorne offers quid pro quo worth billions of dollars to Louisiana Sen Mary Landrieu  More...

Supreme Court takes giant step backwards  More...

House Speaker Pelosi violates U.S. Constitution and Logan Act, commits felony by impersonating Sec of State Condoleezza Rice on trip to Middle East  More...

Education math scores drop across the state as Idaho teachers, administrators, and coaches vacation to Ireland and China on your tax dollars  More...

Idaho GOP Legies add $400 million pork to Demo's Iraq War Bill  More...

Idaho taxpayers subsidize new Micron plant in China  More...

Ex Gov Kempthorne's original $3 billion Highway Plan exceeds $6 billion... Idaho Statesman says, "Pass the budget, no strings attached"  More...

Low carb diet kicks government's low fat guidelines in its big fat butt  More...

The paper chase... Interest rate arbitrage between the Yen and the Dollar  More...

Bullet train from Boise to Meridian derailed as billion dollar local option sales tax bites the dust...poof  More...

Stock market plunges 416 points in one day   More...

"An Inconvenient Truth" morphs into "Convenient Lies" as Hollywood Oscars regurgitate 30-year old Doomsday baloney from the 1970s  More...

Judge cries at Anna Nicole Smith hearing...wins Oscars for Best Actor, Worst Director  More...

World Wide Monetary Inflation...the not-so-Good, the Bad, and the Ugly  More...

Boise's Watergate morphs into Librarygate as Urban Renewal Agency picks Bodo developer for unconstitutionally-funded $130 million "Library Blocks" project  More...

CAMBR fraud at U of  Idaho?  More...

Who's Your Favorite Socialist Candidate for the 2008 Presidency?  More...

Oink-Oink, Boise City Council Feeds at State & Federal Pig Troughs  More...

Big Brother mandates vaccine for 11-year old girls  More...

Ada County Commissioners condemn new Ada County Courthouse, then use Eminent Domain to confiscate their own property... huh?  More...

Where in Hell did Our 3 Branches of Government Go?  More...

The Real Purpose of the Federal Reserve  More...

European Union Dumps German, Officially Adopts English as Universal Language  More...

GOP "Intellectuals" Propose Socialist Job Corps Program to Rebuild Iraq  More...

Kempthorne Plays "Polar Bear Politics"  More...

Boise State outsmarts Oklahoma with Statue of Liberty fake pass, Wins Fiesta Bowl 43-42 in nail-biting overtime  More...

Saddam Hussein

Shell Oil hires ex Sec of Interior Gale Norton...Conflict of interest?  More...

"Black box" trading on the Big it legal... is it moral?
Part 2 

"Black box" trading on the Big it legal... is it moral?
Part 1 

U of I Wallace pleads guilty to state criminal charges in $136 million University Place fine and 3-year probation  More...

If Idaho "needs" more nurses, let supply and demand in the free market automatically solve the "problem"  More...

Boise "needs" a detox center like it "needs" another snort of crack  More...

If Boise's "Library Blocks" project is unconstitutional, then why isn't the Courthouse project unconstitutional?  More...

Bag Boy Wallace Charged with Felony in U of Idaho Crime Spree...Major Perps Skate Free?  More...

2006 Nobel Economist praises "Dynamic Capitalism" by assuming socialist principles  More...

Voters, not the Idaho Transportation Board, must approve billion dollar highway expenditures for "Connecting Idaho"  More...

Wall Street Journal physics readers argue Big Bang Theory  More...

Prop 1: Idaho Teachers' union earmarks 1% of sales tax for itself  More...

Anti-gay marriage amendment unconstitutional  More...

Does University Place's secret civil settlement constitute "burying of public info?"  More...

WSJ thinks function of Fed Reserve is "maintaining an overall stable price level"  More...

Idaho leads world in "Fat Pill" production  More...

Are Idaho's "Rainy Day Funds" unconstitutional?  More...

Federalist Papers do not grant warrant-less searches or carte blanche wire tapping to President  More...

Bodo developer proposes Boise's Watergate method to rip down, rebuild Boise main library  More...

Idaho Baptists launch missiles against California Catholics?  More...

Boise needs a Drug Czar like it needs a Snicker-doodle Czar  More...

Billionaires Waren Buffet and Bill Gates fall ill to socialist philosophy  More...

10 Reasons why Idaho Governor Kempthorne should NOT be confirmed as Secretary of the Interior  More...

U.S. Constitution declared unconstitutional...
not signed by its authors, or anybody else 

Idaho Teachers' union pushes Initiative for  Guaranteed Annual Income by earmarking 1% of sales tax for itself  More...

University Place perps agree to not sue themselves...Pay each other $8.3 million...Cryptic Partners remains as possible 'fall guy' - Part II More...

University Place perps agree to not sue themselves...Pay each other $8.3 million...Cryptic Partners remains as possible 'fall guy' - Part I More...

JFAC gives blank check for Governor Kempthorne's Highway Robbery  More...

Boise's Watergate goes to Washington... Governor Kempthorne nominated as Secretary of Interior  More...

Why Idaho's Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment is Pretended Law...Part II  More...

Why Idaho's Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment is Pretended Law...Part I  More...

Why we don't need property taxes...Part II  More...

Why we don't need property taxes...Part I  More...

Did Japanese mafia steer Hurricane Katrina down Bourbon Street for fun and profit...or revenge?  More...

Why we don't need FEMA or Boise's "Blueprint for Good Growth"  More...

Should Idaho abolish property taxes and implement a flat sales tax?  More...

Gov Kempthorne is not our "CEO"  More...

Ethnomathematics  More...

Fat Idaho  More...

The Fuzzy Math of U.S. Coinage  More...

Birth:  Nature's Transfer of Private Property Rights  More...

Whose Collective Rights?  More...

Is Micron Whining for Corporate Welfare or Demanding Free Market Capitalism?  More...

Catholicism in Latin America Morphs into Socialism  More...

Oil Companies Turn Earth into Giant CO2 Soda Pop Bottles  More...

Idaho Legislature Repeals Itself? ...
Anti-gay Marriage:  The State vs. The Individual  More...

Idaho's Looming Fake Health Care "Crisis" More...

America's Intellectual Hierarchy More...

Eats, Shoots & Leaves
A panda walks into a café.  He orders a sandwich, eats it, then pulls out a gun and blasts two shots into the ceiling.   More...

Anti-gay Marriage:  The State vs. The Individual  More...

Evolution Of Math Instruction In California Public Schools  More...

Why Johnny Can't Read  More...

Does surgery for cancer cause more cancer?   More...

When Good Cells Go Bad (cancer:  who's right: viral theory or trophoblast theory?)  More...

This amazing cartoon was in the Chicago Tribune in 1934. Look carefully at the plan of action.  Note who's driving the out-of-control wagon:  university professors.  Note Stalin and Karl Marx babbling the same type of Obama fascist Progressive plan to "fundamentally transform" America.  Remember the adage, "Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it."


Sound money is a basic human right, derived from private property rights.  Alasdair Macloed says it best:  "Firstly, it is a basic human right to choose to save without our savings being debased by the tax of monetary inflation. Those who are worst affected by this inflation tax are not the rich -- they benefit -- but the poor and the barely well-off, which is why monetary inflation undermines society and why the right to sound money should be respected. If government gives itself a monopoly over money, it has a duty to protect the property rights vested in it.

"Secondly, it is a basic right for us to own our own money rather than have it owned by the banks. For them to take our money and expand credit on the back of it debases it. It is an abuse of an individual's property rights and a banking licence is a government licence to do so. If anyone else was to do this, they would be guilty of fraud. Banks should be custodians of our money, and it should not appear in their balance sheets as their property."

"How ironic and sad, then, that advocates of recognizing gold and silver as money, as was done in not-so-olden times, should be characterized as conservatives, reactionaries, and worse when they are actually liberators and when advocates of infinitely 'elastic' currency are actually the great enablers of totalitarianism throughout the world.

"Sound money guarantees a stable yet progressive economy where people are truly equal. It allows people to save properly for their retirement so that they will not become a burden on the state. It leads to democracy voting for small governments. It encourages peaceful trade and discourages war. It is the only path, after this mess, that leads us to long-lasting and peaceful prosperity. We really need everyone to understand this for the sake of our future."

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men... they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it, and a moral code that glorifies it.  Frederic Bastiat, The Law [1850]  Sound familiar in 2012?  Look around.

Must see movie out on DVD:

"V" for Vendetta...
"The people should not be afraid of their government; Governments should be afraid of their people."

   “Who are you?”

   “Who?  Who is but the form following the function of what, and what I am is a man in a mask.”

   “Well, I can see that.”

   “Of course you can.  I’m not questioning your powers of observation.  I’m merely remarking on the paradox of asking a masked man who he is.”

   “Oh, right.”

   “But on this most auspicious of nights, permit me then, in lieu of the most commonplace sobriquet, to suggest the character of this most dramatis personae:

   Voila!  In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate.

   This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished.  However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.

    The only verdict is vengeance, a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it’s my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.”

    Did You Know...?   

   The Ten Commandments contain 297 words.  The Bill of Rights is stated in 463 words.  Lincoln's Gettysburg Address contains 266 words.  A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.

   Amendment X to the Constitution of the United States, together with Article I, Section 8, prohibits the U.S. Congress from involving itself in cabbage pricing, education, health care, personal safety, campaign financing, most criminal law, toilet capacity, the banning of amino acid supplements (such as tryptophan), vitamins (such as B-17) and thousands of other things it has gotten away with so far.

       Quickie News Briefs     

Friday July 17, 2015

--  Fri July 17, 2015  US Stupidly Sends Klingons a Road Map Back to Planet Earth  More...

--  Wed July 16, 2015  Pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, and listen up, girl friends.  President Hussein Obama, our Islamic Trojan Horse in the Oval Office, just inked a deal with his girl friend's (Valerie Jarrett's) home country, Iran, to give them the capability to build nuclear bombs so they can initiate a Middle East nuclear arms race, wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, and then come after the Great Satan America.  Wow, ain't he clever?  And what a shrewd negotiator Obama is.  Iran doesn't need nuclear power plants for energy.  They're sitting on billions of tons of cheap oil.  So why are they building facilities to create nuclear fission?  Duh, lemme think a minute here.  Hmm, they want to create nuclear fission so they can clean their camels' teeth?  Nooo.  They want to create nuclear fission because it is such clean energy, especially in the hands of Islamic terrorists?  Nooo.  I guess President Hussein Obama has no idea what the Mullahs of Iran want to do with fissionable uranium.  Right.  So Obama has stupidly hammered together the most ridiculous deal possible with Islamic terrorists who took a break during the Iranian nuke negotiations in Austria to fly back to Teheran, Iran, and dance in the streets whilst burning the Israeli and American flags and shouting, "Death to Israel and death to America!"  With no hint of pretentiousness, the Iranian government just spit in the face of Sec of State John Kerry and President Hussein Obama and they both just sat there licking it up.  Now it's all up to the US Congress to pass a resolution that says, "Sorry Akmed, no deal."  All the Republicans will probably vote "NO" on the Iranian Nuke Deal but we don't know how stupid the Democrats might be.  I mean, we're talking about can the Democrats figure out that IRAN IS OUT TO BLOW US OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH!  If the left Liberals do not vote against the Nuke Bad Deal, then it is WW III in the very near future and all of Europe and America will be fighting in the streets just to survive against the coming ISIS Caliphate.  This deal just signed by President Hussein Obama and Dumb Dumb Kerry is Fifty Shades of Hitler, with Obama playing the WW II precursor role of Britain's Neville chamberlain as he caved to the Third Reich's Adolph Hitler by signing the Munich Agreement promising not to take Prague a coupla months before Hitler's Panzer Divisions rolled into Poland and took over.  And then Austria.  And then France.  And then everywhere Hitler felt like it.  Winston Churchill saved the day after Britain woke up and booted Chamberlain out on his ass.  And that's exactly what needs to happen to our fake President Hussein Obama, not just for signing the Iran Nuke Deal, but also for all the other National Socialist crap that he, his phony DOJ, and RINOs in Congress have been foisting down our thoats.  Obama is obviously suffering from delusions of Communist Grandeur with himself playing the role of Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and every state collectivist throughout history who just knew he had the answer to save the world.  The real tragedy is this:  who are all the people in America who felt so guilty that they thought they should elect a black President just because he was black and without paying attention to what he was telling them?  After all, Obama's political teachings came from Frank Marshall, card carrying communist.  His moral philosophy came from Rev Wright's Holy Roller "God Damn America" Church.  And his brains?  What brains?  Nobody in their right mind would commit suicide by signing a nuclear deal with Islamic terrorists who are openly telling everybody -- especially the idiot American negotiators at the table -- that they intend to kill them, to kill their families, to kill all Jews, all Americans, and even each other if they don't fall down on their hands and knees and pretend to pray to an invisible anthropomorphized green weenie floating around in the sky.  And stupid Obama bought off on it because he thinks the Mullahs won't touch him or his family in the future.  He's the first one the Islamos are going to go after.  Obama just negotiated away planet Earth and doesn't have the brains enough to know it.  What a sucker.  Hopefully Congress isn't a bigger sucker.  And if they are, hopefully the GOP will win the Presidency, the House and the Senate in 2016.  Otherwise it will be America's first woman president to lead us down America's first black president's Road to Nuclear Hell.

--  Mon July 13, 2015  Since when has it become the function of the President of the United States to micro manage every citizen's life?  Or even to macro manage it?  The function of the President of the United States is to sit on his butt in the Oval Office, keep his big mouth shut, and make sure the laws passed by Congress are faithfully carried out.  Plus, the President, unfortunately, gets to play Commander-in-Chief of the military when Congress declares war.  But it is not up to the President to implement and monitor how far up your butt your doctor sticks his finger, or how much in taxes you should pay, or whether 30 million illegal immigrants should be paid to sneak across our borders, or establish Carbon Dioxide Fake Monetary Credits for his buddies, or any of the other infinite number of economic government interventions into the economy.  It is also not the President's job to empower foreign nations to develop nuclear bombs, or use the IRS to monitor competing political parties, or to allow the Federal Reserve central bankers to dump hard money and print America into total bankruptcy, or lie to us about his personal history, birth certificate, university attendance, etc.  Mr. Obama -- because he does not deserve the title of "President" -- will go down in history as the worst US president ever, both for what he did do and what he didn't do.  The list is long.  Everything that he did do was to hurt America on purpose.  Everything that he didn't do was also to hurt America on purpose.  Those who have yet to figure this out with either never figure it out or will understand it too late.  Mr. Obama and his socialist cronies intentions are quite obvious now that he has ruled America badly for the last six years:  it is to completely destroy the underlying principles of the Age of Enlightenment -- the philosophy that moved the world from the concept of the Divine Right of Kings to Inherent Individual Rights -- and drag America and the world back into the Dark Ages of Dog Eat Dog, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, and a Totalitarian Dictatorship with people like him, Mr. Obama, trying to micro manage the economy of the world.  What a giant farce he has pulled on America -- especially the very idiots who voted him in in the first place, relying not on intelligence or logic but simply because they felt guilty because he is a black man.  Americans voted in a President in 2008 for the worst possible reason:  because of somebody's ethnicity.  How stupid can you get?  Probably more stupid since they did it not once, but twice.  That means they didn't learn anything from the first time around.  And if they people elect Hilarious Clinton for President in 2016, it means they voted her in because of gender bias, and that will be the third time that the people just didn't learn.  Good luck, people.  You're gonna need it if you stupidly elect Queen Clinton.

--  Mon July 13, 2015  There are some 276 "sanctuary cities" in the United States.  Why do they exist?  Because left Liberal politicians want to protect all the illegal immigrants they ushered in from Mexico in order to obtain more Democratic votes.  But that's not the excuse the Liberals tell everybody.  They say that they want "sanctuary cities" so illegal immigrants who report a crime will not be deported.  But that's bogus.  On FOX News, Judge Janine reported that there is already a law on the books that prevents illegal immigrants from being deported if they report a crime.  It's called a "U-Visa."  If an illegal immigrant sees a murder or robbery happening next door or down the street, all they have to do is go to the cops, fill out a "U-Visa" form, report the murder, and said illegals are protected from being deported.  Hesto presto, easy peasy lemon squeazy.  Therefore, "sanctuary cities" are just a bogus method by which President Obama and his socialist cronies have been protecting their future investment of millions of new Democratic voters.  "Sanctuary cities" are how many Americans are being murdered, robbed, and raped every day in the US because political police forces refuse to turn felonious immigrants over to the federal government for detention and/or deportation.  Dontcha just love how this administration hides the truth from everybody and lies through their teeth?  All in the name of "fundamentally changing" the United States and destroying the American Middle Class.  Why?  Because Obama wants to pretend he was a slave who had to pick cotton on a plantation in Mississippi until he was, oh, about 16 1/2 years old or so.  Uh huh.  You betchum.  Obama and Karl Marx... 

--  Fri July 10, 2015  If anybody still doubts whether the moral philosophy of altruistic state collectivism can destroy a nation, they need look no further than the current moral philosophy of the academic leaders and presidential administration in America today.  Two days ago, a young lady of 32 years of age was walking with her father on Pier 14 in San Francisco when an illegal Mexican immigrant with 7 felony convictions and 5 deportations from the US to Mexico found a gun, pulled the trigger, and killed the young lady walking on the pier.  What does this have to do with the moral philosophy of altruistic state collectivism?  Everything.  Sanchez, the illegal immigrant perp, was turned loose from the San Francisco Sheriff's Dept because the Top Cop said he didn't have to turn the criminal over to ICE -- the federal immigration authorities -- who had asked the San Francisco Sheriff to turn the perp over to ICE.  The San Fran Top Cop said that since San Francisco had declared itself a "sanctuary city," the federal laws did not apply.  The Sheriff was operating under the altruistic moral philosophy of being kind to the illegal immigrant killer.  Yes, the poor killer, who the San Francisco Mayor and City Council felt sorry for.  Plus, they felt sorry for the other illegal immigrants in the community who -- the Sanctuary Idiots claimed -- would be afraid to report criminals because they, the stoolies, might get deported for being an illegal immigrant themselves.  So now we are making laws -- such as misplaced "sanctuary laws" for one group of criminals to not get in trouble for reporting on other groups of criminals?  It's not the illegal immigrants that need protecting.  It's the public in general.  And it is the responsibility of government to protect all individual rights, not just the Democrats' latest Taco Benders who they are allowing into the country to garner more left Liberal votes.  What type of moral philosophy feels sorry for criminals?  Altruistic state collectivism.  What political philosophy were they implementing?  the tyranny of the majority, state collectivism that infringes upon the inherent natural rights of the individual.  Government officials in a limited republic, especially the police, are supposed to protect citizens, not re-write the US Constitution to implement altruistic laws to protect the crooks, the illegal immigrant felons, who are in the country illegally and have already committed multiple crimes of robbery, murder, rape, and drug dealing.  Is it just San Francisco city and county officials who have defaulted on the rights of individuals in favor of altruistic state collectivism for the criminals?  Not hardly.  Look higher, like all the way up to the presidency of the United States:  President Barack Obama and his entire administration.  It is President Obama who stated 22 times that he did not have the constitutional authority to change immigration law and then went ahead to do exactly that by issuing illegal Executive Orders that brought about the senseless murder of a young lady walking on Pier 14 in San Francisco.  Under what type of moral philosophy did Obama issue these EO's?  You guessed it:  altruistic state collectivism.  Obama feels sorry for the poor illegal immigrants -- mainly, he and the Democrats want to give Xmas presents to 20 million illegal immigrant Mexicans to buy votes for the Democratic party.  And what moral philosophy does the Democratic party hold?  That's right, state collectivism, hence we get atrocious interventions into the free market for  Obamacare, his signature national socialist health care fiasco.  In fact, President Obama's stated goal is to "fundamentally change" America, which means he wants to turn the US into a socialist hell hole because he thinks white Americans are to blame for all the past evil empires in the world and he's going to set everything straight, according to his revisionist view of world history.  Namely, he wants to destroy the entire Middle Class through the classic 1960s and 70s Bill Ayers Weatherman guerrilla warfare against America.  He signs illegal EOs to allow tens of millions of illegal immigrants, many of them criminals, into America and redistributes them into the suburbs to make everybody "equal."  He calls it "social justice."  He issues the "race card" against all of America's police departments in order to have the federal government show up and take over those local police departments under the guise of rehabilitating them.  In short, President Obama's moral philosophy of socialism, based upon altruistic state collectivism, and San Francisco City's moral philosophy of the same, is to blame for not only the latest murder of a young lady walking on Pier 14 in San Francisco, but for all the other felonies created by the huge influx of illegal Mexican immigrants within which those criminals hide as they stroll across our southern borders not once, but multiple times to commit multiple crimes.  And the drive-by news media pretends if anybody cries foul about illegal immigration, it is just a giant right wing propaganda conspiracy by the Republicans because they supposedly hate foreigners.  The United States has now become a "sanctuary country," but not for those who are escaping Communism or war torn countries, fleeing for their lives.  The US is now a "sanctuary country" for convicted felons who the current administration is PURPOSELY unleashing upon the American citizens that Obama absolutely loathes.  Every social political and economic action that Obama and his administration has enacted to date has one goal and one goal only:  to "fundamentally transform" -- i.e. to fundamentally destroy -- America's founding moral philosophy of inherent individual rights and free market capitalism.  That's why Obama is the Manchurian Candidate, the Trojan Horse, raising the ISIS Caliphate flag inside the White House.  He is busy attacking American from within and without.  There is no moral philosophical difference between the ideology of Islamic Sharia Law and Obama's National Socialism.

--  Tue June 30, 2015  Notice how the stupid Liberals continually paint themselves into philosophical corners by claiming every entitlement as a "rights" issue.  But entitlements are not "rights."  They are economic commodities or services, services that must be produced by somebody somewhere somehow in order to exchange them -- or erroneously claim them as "rights" -- in the free market.  "Rights" are not commodities or services; "rights" are conditional relationships such as the INDIVIDUAL's right to freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of movement or travel, freedom of religion, and freedom to pursue your own life and happiness.  Conditional "rights" mean that under the condition of non-infringements upon those same "rights" of other individuals (not groups, individuals), you obtain your "rights" inherently from Nature, not from the government.  Thus, we call it Natural Rights Philosophy and you obtain your "rights" at birth, or perhaps before, but -- once again -- you do not receive "rights" from any government.  Governments exist only to prohibit infringement of your inherent rights by others, and by the government itself.  Depending on the level of governmental interference into its citizens' lives, citizens in most nations are receiving economic entitlements  which should be called robbery since the government must take from somebody to give to somebody else.  In the US, politicians have gotten clever and call their robbery the War on Poverty, the War on Health Care, the War on Education, the War on Hunger, the War on Homelessness, and a War on every other wealth redistributionist scheme that government robbers can dream up to rob Peter to pay Paul.  So, while the US Government is busy redistributing all sorts of commodities and services in America and calling it "rights to receive," let's not forget all the John Galts out there who are the producers of that which is being looted and then distributed:  namely, time and labor saving services and commodities.  Governments are actually destroying the free market method of wealth and capital production that is necessary to bring about a high quality of life.  President Obama can jump up and down like Bozo the Clown on the steps of the White House, Light up the White House like a Giant Vertical Rainbow, but please tell me one thing:  what are the left Liberals going to do when the producers, the thinkers, the discoverers, the inventors, the risk takers, those who produce time and labor saving commodities and services in what used to be a free market all of a sudden decide to go on strike and stop producing?  What is going to happen when Atlas shrugs?  The Liberals have no answer.  They simply close their eyes and hope there will be somebody left to rob so they can stay in power.  The Liberals' so-called entitlement "rights" -- which are actually somebody else's production -- will turn to dust, turn to zero, and when the government completely makes it impossible for free men and women to exercise their inherent Natural Rights, the quality of life, our culture of private property rights, and all other rights will, poof, disappear and the economy will collapse back down from today's Western Civilization to nothing but the jungle of dog eat dog dictatorships.  We are halfway there already, as President Obama and his social political economic village idiots drag America down from the rule of law to the rule of men.  See how the Executive Branch and the Supreme Court and Congress divide up everybody's production and erroneously refer to the stolen booty as "entitlements" or "rights to receive" based upon the recipients' -- usually non-producers' -- real or imagined "needs?"  From each according to his ability, to each according to his need is a true recipe for massive poverty and social political economic collapse.  Thank you, Karl Marx, and your student, President Obama, for your brilliant insight into the mathematical value called zero.

--  Mon June 29, 2015  The US Supreme Court, after having just rewritten it's own version of Obama's nationalized health care system from ObamaCare to SCOTUScare, has just rewritten another national law:  to wit, every state in the Union must now recognize Gay Marriage in the same manner as heterosexual marriage.  Let's zero in on the relevant logic about Gay Marriage.  First, let's define gay.  Gay means homosexual.  Marriage means either (1) pro-creational marriage or (2) non-procreational civil unions.  The term "gay marriage" is a biological contradiction since humans cannot produce children via homosexual activity.  Adopt, yes, procreate, no.  The only logical term left is homosexual civil union.  And that is why the US Supreme Court's recent ruling for Gay Marriage is an illogical decision and much ado about nothing.  There is no such thing as "Gay Marriage."  There are only Gay Civil Unions.  Homosexuals are not creating civil unions to produce children and a family.  They are creating civil unions in order to pretend they are the same as a procreational married couple with children so they can obtain standard medical care insurance from employers and visit sick partners at hospitals.  Employers should not be involved in health care insurance in the first place and it only came about because of previous governmental interference in the economy as President Nixon and others froze all prices and wages for some God awful ridiculous reason in the past, therefore bringing about coporations offering benefits such as health care coverage because they couldn't offer increased wages for employees.  Then it became incorporated into law.  See how absurd socialism works?  And now everybody assumes that the cost of health care for employees must automatically fall upon companies.  It's insane.  You might as well claim that companies must provide home mortgage insurance or car insurance for their employees.  All of it to be regulated by the IRS, just like today's nationalized health care, ObamaCare, or lately SCOTUScare.  So Gays want to pretend that if they call their civil unions "Gay Marriage," it legally entitles them to the same benefits -- not rights, benefits -- as Heterosexual Families vis a vis employer benefits, etc.  In essence, there was no need for the Supereme Court to even get involved in the left Liberal made up debate about "Gay Marriage" because gays already had legal contractual rights as civil unions.  But now the Supreme Court has really opened another can of worms.  Does Gay Marriage mean that gays can claim discrimination if a Wedding Cake shop refuses to bake and cater gay-themed wedding cakes?  Or does the Wedding Cake owner get to claim it is against his religious beliefs to create homosexual wedding cakes and thus refuse to bake and cater to Gay Marriages?  Do gay "rights" trump religious "rights?"  Or vice versa?  Or is there really a contradiction?  Logically, nobody should be able to force another person or business to produce a service or commodity that the producer does not want to create.  Period.  No reason needs to be given.  If I don't want to produce a service to anybody, for any reason whatsoever, that is my right.  In many cases, it may not be economically smart or prudent to refuse such service, but it is not illegal to make bad economic choices that others may call "prejudicial."  In many cases, the term prejudice or discrimination may turn out to be logically correct, both economically or in other ways.  The proper judgment by the Court should be to uphold individual rights, not pander to "politically correct" and ill-defined New Speak from left Liberals.  Gays must face the social political economic fact that they can't be simultaneously the same as, but different than, heterosexuals.  If you want to have a gay marriage, create a civil union.  If you want to procreate with an individual of the opposite sex and have a normal biological family, get married.  It ain't that complicated, folks.  And we don't need 9 Bozos wearing black robes in Washington DC to tell us what marriage is.  We need the government to get out of the business of interfering in business.  Period. End of story.  Footnote:  Mark my words:  this latest ruling on gay marriage will soon bump up against the Bill of Rights and everybody will be wringing their little hannies about what to do about it.  Like we don't have enough to worry about with 8 billion overpopulated people on Earth, 16 billion in fifteen years, 32 billion in 15 more years, 64 billion in 15 years thereafter but human beings don't affect pollution, weather, food or anything else on planet Earth, right?  Right. Uh huh, you bet.  Hint:  California doesn't have a shortage of water; it has overpopulation.  Welcome to India and other Third World countries who procreate like rabbits.  Wake up or your children's children will starve to death, folks.  It's straight mathematics.

-- Thur June 25, 2015  "Hallelujah," cried President Obama and his socialist cronies in the White House as they cheered today's 6-3 decision by the US Supreme Court that ObamaCare subsidies are OK for those thirty-some-odd states that chose NOT to implement ObamaCare in their states.  Chief Justices John Roberts and Kennedy voted "yes" after essentially re-writing the ObamaCare legislation passed by Congress.  As Justice Scalia said, "The so-called Affordable Care Act should be renamed 'the SCOTUScare Act,'" since it has essentially been re-written by the Justices of the US Supreme Court.  President Obama immediately jumped onto national TV after the Supreme Court's ruling and declared that this means that ObamaCare is "here to stay."  And that's true, except for errrh, screech, halt, well... for at least the next 18 months of Obama's last term in office.  Then, one of two things will happen:  (1) Hilarious Clinton could win the 2016 presidency and thus ObamaCare would remain until it drives the American economy bankrupt, or (2) the GOP could win the 2016 presidency, retain the US House and Senate and then REPEAL ObamaCare altogether.  Easy peasey lemon squeezie.  Just like the repeal of alcohol prohibition in the early 20th century.  Remember Congress writes laws and can repeal laws.  So, the Big Question: was today's decision the plan by Chief Justice John Roberts all along, to throw the decision back onto Congress and a new president in 2016, or do the Democrats have dirty pictures of Justice Roberts, or do they have a gun to Roberts' head?  We will probably never know.  One thing is for certain:  today's US Supreme Court ruling giving the green light for Obama's bankrupt national socialist health care system makes it almost mandatory that the GOP must win the 2016 presidential elections and retain both houses of Congress if we are to bring sanity back to the US economy.  This issue is not about health care.  This issue is a moral philosophical war of ideas:  individual rights and the free market vs. state collectivism and government dictatorship.  So far, President Obama has succeeded in bringing about a racist socialist dictatorship.  It all falls upon the intelligence -- rather the lack of intelligence -- of the American public.  And this lack of intelligence is a direct result of America's nationalized public education system.  Good luck on changing that.

--  Sat June 13, 2015  Here's a funny political conundrum:  the Spokane, Oregon branch of the NAACP -- the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People -- is apparently being run by a honky, according to her honky white parents whose ancestry, they claim, is Czech, Swedish, and German with a trace of American Indian.  Everybody do a rain dance, yahoo.  It seems that Ms. Rachel Dolezal, Head Honcho of the Spokane NAACP also teaches African studies to college kids.  Good luck, kids.   We at FM Duck don't really give a crap about Ms. Dolezal's government-defined DNA gene pool, but we do have a couple of questions and observations.  First, what the hell is this NAACP group all about?  I mean, the "national association for the advancement of colored people?"  Really?  What color are we talking about here?  Pink, purple, brown, black, red, green with yellow poka dots?  C'mon.  Haven't most Americans become color blind by now?  After all, it is the year 2015.  And what "advancement" for "colored people" are we talking about?  Is the NAACP a racially-oriented political organization that wants to use the government to intervene on its behalf to obtain free cookies and lollipops for whatever color of people they represent -- which, by now, is not exactly clear since the Prez/Director/Head Honcho is Caucasian, says Mom and Dad, while the majority of its members are 50 shades of black.  Ironically, the conundrum of a Reverse Oreo running the Spokane NAACP may have all started after Mom and Dad adopted four black African siblings when Rachel was a teeny bopper.  Rachel married and divorced a black dude and claims something along the lines of, "Well, shoot, man, everybody on the planet evolved from the continent of Africa, therefore I qualify for leading the Spokane Branch of the NAACP, right?"  Yeah, right.  Like who cares about your supposed 20 million year old gene pool and extrapolation of cultural anthropology, Rachel?  But what's this "advancement" thing?  Are you raking in federal money or in any way obtaining government cookies and Xmas presents by pretending to be Michael Jackson in disguise?  (There's a multiple metaphor for you.)  If not, then more Black Power to you, Brown Sugar, and have fun in your ethnic glee club.  Let's face it:  if you join a club based solely on race, does that make you a racist?  Who knows?  How about creating a National Association for the Advancement of Inherent Individual Rights, regardless of ethnicity?  Now there's a minority: the individual.  Or how about creating a group regardless of gender, all you peaceful moderate Islamic Bozos who are busy stoning women in the Middle East and the rest of the world using Muslim Sharia Law as your frail testosterone excuse?  Oh, sorry, but we already have such a club for inherent individual rights.  It's called the US Constitution with a Bill of Rights.  Wake up, people.  The NAACP is out of date and totally irrelevant.

-- Sat June 13, 2015  Hoo boy!  The brilliant city council and mayor of Los Angeles just voted in a minimum wage of $15.00 an hour by 2020 for businesses that have 25 employees or more.  The current minimum wage mandated by our interventionist government is $7.25.  Businesses with less employees have one extra year to implement the $15.00 mandatory minimum wage.  Let's analyze this stupid economic step by the City of Idiot Angels.  First, all economists -- from free marketeers to socialists -- already know that minimum wages lead to either unemployment or the shutting down of marginal businesses.  A wage is just another business expense that is passed on to the consumer in the price of the commodity being sold.  If wages double, employers must fire enough employees (or use robots) to save on expenses just to stay in business.  Somebody's going to lose their job while somebody else uses the government to double their salary.  That's if the business can even stay in business after employee expenses double.  Marginal businesses, by definition, are already barely hanging on.  They most likely will go bankrupt because they cannot cover an increase in expenses.  So, everybody loses:  the employees who get a pink slip, the employer is is now bankrupt, and the consumer who cannot buy the product any longer.  The idea that government can force businesses to hire employees at any cost is a joke and the joke, unfortunately, is on the very people who think they will be working at MacDonald's or a car wash for $15.00 in a current market where the existing free market wage for entry level jobs is around $7.25 an hour.  Entry level jobs for teenagers were never meant to be career level jobs for life.  Nobody expects to raise a family of four by working their entire life at some fast food joint or a car wash.  Besides the questionable interference of government into the exchange ratios (costs, prices, and wages) in a free market, it is pure economic insanity to think that a carte blanche increase in all businesses' expenses will, on net, make life better for America's workers.  Look for Los Angeles to not only not prosper by establishing a minimum wage of $15.00 per hour by 2020 or 2021, look for unemployment to jump radically before 2020 as businesses anticipate this added cost.  Businesses will simply pick up and move to more free market-oriented states where economic village idiots are not forcing unemployment with ridiculous governmental intervention into the free market.  California will soon become a hell hole of an economy for both employees and for all Californians who will soon discover that they can't even find a burger shop much less afford $50 for French Fries.  All the economic village idiots cheering for a $15.00 per hour minimum wage in Los Angeles will soon discover that they just voted in the loss of their own jobs.  What dummies.  Hint:  in a true free market economy, all prices trend toward zero, which is exactly what one wants because it means that more capital has accumulated due to time and labor-saving devices.  In a socialist economy, or in a mixed economy of government intervention, all prices trend toward infinity until there are no commodities left on the shelf to buy because they are artificially priced out of the market.  The reason socialist nations eventually go bankrupt is because they destroy the free market pricing mechanism that is required for businessmen to perform profit and loss calculations to see if supply and demand are feasible.  Destroy this mechanism and nobody, not the government, not businessmen, not nobody nohow can perform meaningful economic calcs and thus the interventionist economy must go bust.  Los Angeles just committed economic suicide by signing up for the doubling of their city's minimum wage.  Run for your damn lives Angelenos; the socialists just gained the sanction of their victims -- hey, that's you, LA -- and they're cheering in the streets as the economic idiots run over their economic cliffs like lemmings running into the sea.  One more thing:  the left Liberal Democrats in California may have obtained 20 million more votes from the influx of Illegal Mexican Immigrants to perpetuate their government welfare programs -- such as minimum wages -- but picture this:  at their current rate, California in about 10 years or less will soon resemble the abject poverty of socialist Mexico because that's exactly who they imported into California to make it just like what the Illegals thought they escaped from.  That is a joke.  A very cruel joke.  I have a wild idea:  how about laissez-faire free market capitalism?  That way, everybody gets a job and prices trend toward zero as capital accumulates.  Duh...

--  Thur June 11, 2015  Hey, girl friends, pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, shut up, and listen up.  New fad going around America today.  It's called:  dum-da-dum, the "one word" debate, created by left Liberals who can't think, argue, or debate.  So, they have decided that the mere utterance of a single word is all they have to say in order to carry on a logical discussion of anything.  What are some of these "one words" that Liberals are using today in their "one word" arguments, pretending they have just uttered the last word in philosophical logic?  How about, "Ooh, that's racist."  Or, "that's sexist."  Or, "that's soooo Islamophobic," or "Anything-phobic."  "Ooh, ooh, that's profiling."  In this clever manner -- or so they think -- Liberals claim to have slaughtered their opponents in any discussion at university, at the dinner table, in a bar, or on the street.  Yeah, all you gotta do if you're a Liberal during a heated discussion, argument or debate is scream, "That's sexist," and then snicker as if you've just discovered E=mc2 to close off your argument.  In this crafty manner, Liberals don't ever have to think logically and after blabbering their "one word" argument they can then wander off to their next disconnected thought glob.  University professors are quite adept at this type of argumentation, while simultaneously encouraging their retarded students to laugh at other students who might be trying to elevate the discussion to step-by-step rational logic.  What should you do if a Liberal professor tries to pull the "one word" debate against you?  Just call him a "lesbo tranny Ni**** with a bitching retarded turban" and then walk away as you flip him off with your own "one word" argument:  the middle finger.  Then change classes because you're going to get an F-minus in this class.

--  Thur June 11, 2015  Let's say you wanted to destroy an entire nation... from within.  What would you do?  First, you buy a flute and start playing it, dancing around the youth at universities and in the nation's ghettoes.  Your goal is to destroy the ability of the youth of your target nation to think.  Control the nation's public education system at the college level, and induce the intellectuals to push their anti-rational thinking down to the K-12 public education level.  Destroy freedom of speech with New Speak, politically-correct speech.  Ban certain words.  Re-define words.  Re-write history.  Pick a scapegoat and blame every evil in the world on whomever you choose as the scapegoat.  Perpetuate the myth that you are in a minority class and that you have been discriminated against personally.  Second, ignore the constitutional laws of the target nation and implement in any way possible new "laws."  These new "laws" should contain thousands of pages of gobble-dee-gook nonsensical disconnected thought globs that nobody can understand.  The new "laws" should guarantee free everything:  health care, food, clothing, transportation, houses, and everything you can think of.  Destroy the economy by letting central bankers and the national government to print up trillions of non-backed currency to spend like drunken sailors on shore leave.  Create racist and economic class warfare.  Blame the rich.  Blame the language.  Blame everything you can think for everybody's real or imagined economic inequality.  Pretend that the nation is a land of Haves and Have-Nots.  Third, destroy the police and judicial system.  Start race riots in the inner city ghettoes and blame the police.  Ignore all constitutional laws and pass new Executive Orders and Judicial Reviews to accomplish whatever you want.  Fourth, put a ball and chain around the target nation's military forces and don't allow them to protect the nation.  Create your own political police force and use existing bureaucracies -- such as taxing agencies -- to stifle, bankrupt, and destroy any political opponents who may pop up to try and defend themselves.  Show up on national TV and repeat your lies over and over and over until a good portion of the population believes your lies.  That's how you destroy a nation from within:  play your Pied Piper's flute and lead the target nations' youth and specific minority groups down the Yellow Brick Road to the Land of OZ where you continue to blow smoke up their asses.  Finally, just send all the Dorothy's and Toto's who refuse to conform to your new "rules" to re-education camps where "Work Makes One Free."  No, we're not talking about the Obama Administration and America, we're talking about Adolph Hitler and how he convinced the German people to voluntarily implement The Third Reich, National Socialism and The Holocaust.  What makes you think we were talking about President Obama and his "good intentions" for America?  No connection there; nothing to see here; move right along.

--  Sun May 31, 2015  One year ago, the American-trained Iraqi Army, armed with tons of super duper US weapons, peed their pants and ran off into the sand dunes when 700 rag-tag ISIS Bozos threatened to overrun -- right, overrun -- thousands of Iraqi Army chicken shifts.  Last week, after another umpteen million dollars created out of thin air by the US Federal Reserve, thousands of American-trained Iraqi Army chickens, cluck cluck, threw down their weapons, deserted their Humvees, and ran off into the sand dunes again when it was rumored that a couple of ISIS Jihadists were in the neighborhood of Baghdad, Mosel, or The Last Chance Date Shoppe.  At least they didn't strip off their Army uniforms and dump them into the laundry like last year.  What's it gonna take for the US to understand Rule Number 1:  Don't try to arm chicken shifts with high caliber US weapons, tanks, guns, Humvees, and lollipops because they're going to cut and run as soon as Sponge Bob comes traipsing over the hill.  What's the problem?  I mean, with the Iraqis, not the US trainers, we'll get to the latter later?  The Iraqis are a bunch of rag heads whose allegiance is to their little tribal leaders, not to a country known as Iraq.  Iraq is a joke.  It has no meaningful constitution of inherent individual rights, especially for women, just like in all the other little tribal countries comprising the Middle East.  Their social political economic philosophy is a big fat zero.  All they understand is mob rule, tribal warfare, and how to rule by testosterone force and fraud.  They did not evolve from the thought process of Divine Right of Kings to Natural Rights philosophy like the Europeans and Americans.  The moral philosophy of the Middle East is the Allah Akbar Fairytale comprised of Sharia Law and whoever holds the biggest club.  Training Iraqis to fight for Natural Rights philosophy is an expensive waste of time.  It is not the Iraqis who are stupid -- well, actually their moral philosophy is stupid -- as much as it is the American politicians running the Middle East war who are too stupid to understand what they got themselves into, namely, a lose-lose situation if they think they can train Middle Easterners who want a Caliphate and to beat their women every other whipstitch Wednesday into fighting for "limited government," Mom, apple pie and baseball.  It ain't gonna happen.  And how did it all come to this?  Some stupid central bankers created a Petro Dollar Deal, formed OPEC to force the rag heads to buy and sell their oil in only federal reserve notes so the bankers could pump up the money supply and make themselves filthy rich, and so the central bankers could guide the US military to fight phony orchestrated wars in the Middle East to protect their oil investment.  The Saudis got filthy rich and rewarded the US by providing 17 of the 18 US World Trade Center bombers -- and notice how fast former Prez Georgie Pordgie Bush whisked the sons and daughters of Saudi princes out of American colleges the day after the rich 17 Saudis blew our asses sky high -- and made a fortune by shorting airline futures.  Now we got the Hillary Clinton Foundation doing essentially the same type of thing when Twinkle Toes Clinton was Sec of State, selling billions of dollars worth of favors and US arms to Middle Eastern and other nations in exchange for "donations" -- ha ha, "donations" -- to the Bill and Hillbilly Foundation so Bill and Hilarious Clinton could garner the Democratic nomination for the presidency in 2016.  Works like a charm, too.  Dumb bell Liberals praise Bill and Hillbilly for saving natives in the jungle from HIV and Polio and Bad Breath while paying themselves (Bill and Hilly) hundreds of millions of dollars in salaries and cookies and simultaneously collecting illegal contributions from foreign nations for their presidential campaign coffers.  Smiling all the way to the White House, too, where, if Hillbilly wins the presidency, she will finish Obama's job of turning America into a socialist hell hole where we have totalitarian social justice, distribution of monetary equality (total poverty for all), and a raging civil war in every major city in America.  Instead of trying to train Iraqis to fight for non-stated non-objectives in the Middle East, the US and whoever it can convince to become true allies, should simply STOP training any Middle Easterners, STOP providing weapons to ISIS via the chicken shift Iraqis who always cut and run at the mere mention of Mickey Mouse and Tinker Bell, and proceed directly to GO, Collect $200, and then bunker bomb the nuclear facilities of Iran to make sure the Mullahs don't get a nuclear bomb.  If, on  the way to GO the US can liberate women and children from Sharia Law, good luck.  And while we're taking out Iran's nuclear facilities, we should think about erasing the DMZ between North and South Korea.  Whoever drew that line in the sand was a total idiot.  Kim Jung Un or il or Dinkleberry is just a fat little brat who will no doubt drop dead of diabetes type II before age 40 -- going on 14 -- anyway.  When is the US going to wise up?  You can't train people to fight who don't see what's wrong with the way they are living in the first place.  Like beating their women and selling them into slavery.  Stop providing the camel drivers with US weapons.  Period.  End of story.

-- Fri May 22, 2015  News Flash to Megyn Kelly at FOX News and all 2016 presidential candidates who have forgotten recent history:  Did Saddam Hussein have Weapons of Mass Destruction or not?  Read the following by Ann Coulter:  Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say that Jeb Bush is Retarded?  More...

--  Sat May 16, 2015  Super Bowl quarterback Tom Brady and the Players' Union are suing the National Football League (the NFL) for blaming Brady for deflating footballs during an NFL playoff game against the Indianapolis Colts.  Brady's team, the New England Patriots, was fined a million smackeroos, Brady was barred from playing their team's first 4 games next season, and the Patriots lose their first two NFL draft picks.  FM Duck's Big Question is:  Where in hell do the referees in the NFL stand in all of this?  It is up to the refs to "ref" the game, isn't it?  Don't they touch the football a thousand times during each 4-hour game?  Are they not responsible for making sure the football during the game is properly inflated?  Who's responsibility is it?  The Fat Lady in the end zone bleachers?  The Head Ref's grandmother?  C'mon, sports fans, judges, juries, other football players, the Ref Association, and beautiful blonde sportscaster women who have never thrown a football in their life and ask the coaches at half time how their little toe feels.  It is up to the referees.  Period.  End of story.  But nobody in the NFL, nobody in the news media, and no Fat Lady in the bleachers has popped up and said, "Hey, what are the refs getting paid for if not to adjudicate the damn football game?"  And that includes the amount of air in the football, you clowns.  Next thing you know, the refs are going to ask people on live twitter what the next call should be since the refs have no responsibility for reffing the game, right?  Headlines:  "Tom Brady fined for throwing football spitballs using Vaseline hidden in his jockstrap.  TSA forgets to X-ray Tom Brady before Super Bowl Game.  Obama trades Tom Brady and four receivers for Bowe Bergdahl."  Where does this end?  Let's use some common sense.  Make the refs do their job: namely, check everybody's balls, especially the blonde women sportscasters, the latter for which I volunteer.

--  Sat May 16, 2015  Boston Bomber Islamic terrorist Abduhl Mohammed Bozo Tsarneav Whatever received the death penalty from a jury in Boston yesterday for his part in setting off bombs that killed and maimed runners at the Boston Marathon finish line last year, or was it a year ago?  Who can keep track of all the atrocities that the Islamic terrorists are committing on a daily basis?  Does this mean that Bozo gets to claim himself as a martyr for Allah, if ten years later after the fact (the bombing) he is hung, shot, lethally injected, or electrocuted for his act of knocking off infidels?  That seems like a long stretch to claim that Abduhl Bozo will have died in the act of killing infidels.  I mean, the appellate process alone will probably take about ten years.  Does the Islamic religion claim that you can set off a bomb, twiddle your thumbs in a prison cell for ten to fifteen years, get fried in the electric chair, and still claim that you died in battle?  Really?  Whoa, what a Klingon warrior.  But why not?  Sharia Law and the Islamic terrorists seem to be making up their own moral philosophy as they go along, sort of like a bunch of little kids playing marbles on the playground and arguing that because it's Friday it's now OK for little Johnny's thumb to be inside the marble circle when he shot little Freddie's cat's eye marble out of the ring.  Uh-huh.  Kind of like the Obama White House:  the rules for his executive authority change every day.  Let's see now, is this Tuesday?  Well, hell, then it's OK for Obama to release 5 Gitmo terrorists in exchange for US Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl without asking Congress, plus if it's an even numbered day, Obama can throw in an unconstitutional authority to grant amnesty to 10 million Illegals storming across our southern border so they can vote for the Democrats next year.  Merry Xmas.  Yessss, indeed.  And that's how Islamic terrorist law works, too:  by the seat of their turbans, the little butt heads.  Back to the scene of the crime.  Perhaps the Boston jurors in the Bozo Tsarnaev case should have voted for life imprisonment for little Brother Bozie.  That way, he would not be granted martyrdom by the Islamic terrorists, at least as the Islamic rules currently stand at this nanosecond in time.  Tisk, tisk.  Bozo's older brother who died during his terrorist act of trying to escape gets to go to Islamic Heaven and rape 72 virgins but poor little Brother Bozo who gets life imprisonment in Super Max, Colorado, receives no Medal of Martyrdom and goes directly to Hell for getting caught by the infidels.  Tough luck Little Boze.  You should have strapped your bomb to your own ass, driven out to hodunk, and blown yourself up (with three infidel ducks in the marshes) to Kingdom Come.  Then again, maybe President Obama will pardon you and let you out of Super Max in three months, trading you for a dead elephant from Pakistan.

--  Fri May 15, 2015  All of the GOP presidential candidates were recently asked by Megyn Kelly and other FOX News journalists, "Knowing what we know now, namely that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in Iraq after the New York Twin Towers attack, would you have authorized going to war against Saddam Hussein in Iraq?"  Dutifully accepting the premise that there were no WMDs in Iraq, all GOP presidential candidates from Carly Fiorina to Jeb Bush to Rand Paul to Marco Rubio to you-name-it said, "No."  Really?  But wait a minute.  It was just reported by the NY Times, Wall Street Journal and other news rags that ISIS in 2014 found all kinds of WMDs in Iraq as they stormed over major Iraqi cities after Obama pulled essentially all the US troops out of Iraq.  ISIS discovered caves full of sarin gas rockets and other terrorists have found lots of yellowcake, the precursor to making nuke bombs.  The condition of the sarin and mustard gas rockets were in bad shape but that does not mean they were in bad shape when George Bush initiated the war almost 13 years ago.  And who says that ISIS can't pick up the formula from these weapons to create new ones, especially since stupid Obama left so many US weapons on the battle field in his hasty retreat of American troops from Iraq including billions in accessible bank accounts?  The tons of nuclear yellowcake can be converted to nuclear bombs today.  And who is invading Iraq?  Iran.  And who is President Obama trying to make a nuclear deal with, with no success?  Iran.  ISIS is Iran and the Mullahs who are running ISIS have just lucked into a whole lot of WMDs that they can now exploit.  So, the real problem is that the GOP has now bought into the baloney that George Bush started a war in Iraq when, the left Liberals claim, there was and, they believe, still is no proof of WMDs, even though the left Liberal news media are reporting that ISIS has found many WMDs.  GOP presidential candidates:  please check your premises before you answer questions whose premises may be false.  If the news about ISIS is correct, then the correct answer to the question, "Should Bush have gone to war against Saddam Hussein because Saddam was stockpiling and using (he gassed a lot of his own people) WMDs?" should be a resounding, "Yes, indeed!"  It wasn't a question of whether there were WMDs, there apparently were.  However, the war going in by Bush, and the war going out by Obama, were both executed very badly -- especially the exit by Obama.  Yes, people (including Americans and others) needed to be saved, just like in Vietnam, the average every day Joe Doe needed to be saved.  But once the politicians took over, in both Vietnam and Iraq, everything went to hell in a hand basket.  The GOP should find out the truth and then answer news journalists accordingly instead of just accepting erroneous premises.  It is Obama and the left Liberals who are now placing the entire world in jeopardy as they totally underestimate ISIS and the moral philosophy of Islam.  Pied Piper Barack Obama has led the youth of America into a false future scenario with socialist sophisms of sugar plum fairy day dreams, and they will pay for it dearly unless a more enlightened presidential candidate suddenly emerges.  We do not need a war hawk who simply supports crony socialists in the military industrial complex (they are not free market capitalists) and we do not need pacifists falling for the lies of Islamic Mullahs.  We need leaders who have the experience and rational logic to understand how to strategically and tactically undo the current rampage of altruistic state collectivism, which in the Middle East is altruistic religious collectivism.  Forget Obama's "good intentions."  The road to hell is paved with "good intentions."  Watch Hillary Clinton win the presidency in 2016 as the Left gains the sanction of their victims:  namely all the Republican presidential candidates who have failed to check their premises in many areas of social political and economic thought.

--  Sun May 10, 2015  OK, this is Mother's Day, so let's talk football.  What's all this crap about accusing Patriot's quarterback Tom Brady with "deflating" footballs used in the NFL?  Even if each opposing team gets to provide their own footballs for any given game, they cannot do much to affect the inflation of their footballs outside the given guidelines.  First, every game has at least 7 referees, many of whom handle the football multiple times before and after EVERY SINGLE PLAY for 3-4 hours per game.  Are we supposed to believe that some player on one of the teams can deflate all of his team's provided footballs below the legal limit and not one of the 7 referees has the ability or brains to detect that the footballs are too flabby or wobbly?  Second, both teams get to use the same footballs throughout the game.  If a lower poundage helps one team then it would also help the other team.  It's not just the quarterback that handles the ball, it's also the center, the receivers, the cornerbacks, the halfbacks, the fullbacks, the punters, the point after the score kickers, and so on.  To suggest that lowering the air pressure in all the footballs provided by one team for a game helps that team's quarterback and does not help the opponents or even hinders said quarterback's other teammates approaches a level of total absurdity.  In the specific game under question -- all this whining and cry-babbying by the Colts who lost to the Patriots in a playoff game before the Super Bowl Game in which the score was something like 38 (Patriots) to 3 (Colts) -- stretches this entire Deflation Gate Hypothesis to incredible stupidity.  The bottom line is:  the 7 referees handle the footballs multiple times per pay for 4 hours each game.  If they are unable to tell the difference between a legal football and an illegal football, we need to shut down the NFL and go watch tennis, in which, by the way, the tennis players choose (during each serve throughout the entire match) which tennis ball offered up by the ball boys/girls that they want to use for each serve and thus which ball is used during the resulting play after each serve.  Similarly, the 3-4 refs in soccer check the balls used during a soccer match and are responsible for the inflation of each ball.  No, it ain't up to the goalie, Martha; it's up to the referee of the game.  Back to football: News media and other whiners who probably couldn't throw a spiral if their life depended upon it, zip your lips about the possibility of a quarterback affecting the inflation poundage of all the footballs used in a game, fooling all the refs, and thus determining the outcome of a game.  That's ridiculous.  Go 49er's!  And Manchester United...

--  Wed Apr 06, 2015  Addendum on freedom of speech.  The reason that one must confront the religion of Islam vis a vis freedom of speech is that one of the basic tenets of Islam denies inherent individual rights, especially for women.  While so-called peaceful Muslims claim they do not agree with Islamic terrorists, where are these peaceful Muslims?  Who is really in charge of the Muslim religion, the Mullahs in Iran and other Middle East nations or Muslims sitting around in America doing and saying nothing about how their religion is being expressed throughout the world?  Doing nothing, not confronting the bullies in Islam who are slaughtering innocent victims, has brought about the fanaticism of Islamic terrorists all across the world.  All the major Earth religions are different forms of moral philosophy.  Any moral philosophy that holds as one of its basic tenets that women do not have inherent individual rights of freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, or any other inherent freedoms is not a true religion -- not a true moral philosophy -- that supports an individual's right to life, a right to one's own mind, body, and soul.  For example, if a major religion claims that its adherents can rob banks, kill people, and redistribute other people's money, and claims that it's OK because that is part of their religion, they are morally wrong.  Any religion whose basic axiomatic primaries contain the abrogation of other individuals' rights, is not a true religion; it is slavery.  Any religion that claims contradictory concepts that disregards others' inherent rights is not a religion.  At least it is not a religion for life.  At best, it is simply a vicious cult.  And those who adhere to those principles -- such as Sharia Law in which women have no rights -- but claim they are peaceful or moderate are truly kidding themselves and, in fact, are simply subsidizing bad behavior.  Islam, as it is expressed today throughout the world via Sharia Law, is a bankrupt moral philosophy that does not recognize even the basic inherent rights of men, women, and children.  Those who initiate force and fraud have, by their actions, given up their rights.  The victims of Islamic terrorists have the right of self defense and that is exactly what Ms. Geller who set up the Mohammed Cartoon Drawing Contest did to protest the current bankrupt cult of Islam, and she did it in a peaceful mode of protest.  She did not initiate force or fraud against the two Islamic terrorists who showed up to kill innocent people who were peacefully protesting Sharia Law at the Dallas Cartoon Contest.  And FOX TV news reporter Megyn Kelly seems to be the only commentator who stood up for inherent individual rights by stating it is not the CONTENT of a speech that defines freedom of speech, but rather the act of peacefully speaking.  The fact that a peaceful Cartoon Contest questioning the tenets of a contradictory vicious religious cult was physically attacked by adherents of the very religion that Ms. Geller was protesting speaks volumes about who is right and who is wrong.  Nobody has the right to initiate violent attacks against somebody who is peacefully protesting the tenets of Islam or any other religion.  That is what freedom of speech means and too many news commentators, both on the left and the right, still do not get it.  Once again, a religion's basic tenet cannot be the abrogation of other individuals' inherent rights.  Otherwise, that religion's moral philosophy is nothing but a collectivist cult of illogical, disconnected thought globs.  Welcome to Islam.

--  Wed Apr 06, 2015  Two Islamic jihadists showed up to a Dallas convention center in order to knock off as many attendees as they could at a Draw a Cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed Contest.  But as soon as they encountered a police security blockade at the convention parking lot and then jumped out and opened fire with automatic weapons against the police, one of the security police shot and killed both jihadists with his trusty 9 mm service weapon.  Now the news media, including some at FOX TV News are blaming the deaths of the jihadists on the sponsor of the Mohammed Cartoon Drawing Event, Pamela Geller.  Ms. Geller states that she was holding the Cartoon Drawing Event (1) to show Islamic terrorists that they cannot prohibit her First Amendment right to freedom of speech, and (2) in sympathy with the French and European cartoonists who were murdered for also drawing cartoons of the so-called prophet Mohammed.  FOX News host Bill O'Reilly joined with the typical left Liberal journalists and TV commentators in saying that while Ms. Geller has a First Amendment right to hold such a contest, they think that it was rather rude and unnecessary to do so.  They blame Ms. Geller and the cartoon participants for the shootings and deaths.  So, let's analyze exactly what the issue really is.  First, everybody agrees that Ms. Geller has the First Amendment right to implement such a drawing contest.  But then, this is where those who do not understand the true philosophy of freedom of speech go bezonkers as they criticize the Muslim Prophet Cartoon Contest.  Namely, they jump ahead to one of the possible outcomes -- that Muslims would be offended and might murder somebody -- and then, based upon that possible illegal outcome, claim, therefore, that Ms. Geller's action -- freedom of speech -- should not happen or be allowed to happen.  But wait a minute.  Isn't that exactly the point?  That is, curtailment of freedom of speech should not be dependent upon what some loonies, or terrorists, or even peaceful Muslims may or may not do, or may or may not think, about the speech, the cartoon drawings in this case.  This is not the same thing as crying "Fire" in a crowded theatre where there is no fire since in that case, crying "Fire" is the initiation of fraud by an individual who has an implied contract with the other theatre-goers to not lie about a hazardous condition inside a darkened theatre.  Drawing cartoons to question the tenets of any religion whether it be Christian, Muslim, Jewish, or Voodoo Witch Doctors on Bourbon Street in New Orleans is the inherent right of every American.  The reason the Foundation Fathers put freedom of speech in the US Constitution was exactly what Ms. Geller used it for:  to argue against other people's moral philosophy that denies inherent individual rights, especially those rights of women.  It is just as much your right to make fun of Muslims who claim they get to cohort with 72 virgins if they knock off a Christian or a Jew as it is your right to make fun of Christian Easter Bunnies and kids searching for Easter eggs or Jews wearing beanie hats with propellers on them, or whatever.  The big difference is that Islamic terrorists are currently slitting Christians' and Jews' throats all over the world and claiming Mohammed said it was their duty to do so.  To make things worse, the so-called peaceful Muslims not slitting anybody's throats are simply sitting around doing nothing and thus condoning those actions.  Inaction is often the same as support for bad actions by others.  The only TV news host who appeared to understand the meaning, both legally and philosophically, of inherent individual rights to freedom of speech was Megyn Kelly on FOX News.  It is not the subject matter per se, i.e., the content of the speech, that matters but rather the moral philosophy that allows the act of freedom of speech.  What one says is not the issue; the inherent right to say it is what matters.  In fact, the more incendiary the subject matter -- omitting the false cry of "Fire" in a crowded theatre when there is no fire -- the more important it is that Americans should exercise their freedom of speech.  What if Adolph Hitler was trying to take over America and you wanted to blast him with a speech.  Should you not do it because Adolph might call out the Brown Shirts and shoot up the crowd?  What if Adolph said you can't talk against his Nazism?  That is what Ms. Geller and Ms. Kelly were stating:  the Nazis of the Islamic terrorist group who are embedded in the general Muslim religion do not get to dictate whether we are allowed freedom of speech.  Good for you Ms. Kelly, for recognizing and standing up for the real philosophical issue in this case, and good for you Ms. Geller for showing the Islamic terrorists and everybody else that they cannot dictate the terms of any individual's right to freedom of speech.  The rest of the news media?  Cowards.  Their motto:  Oh, sob, sob, don't challenge the bullies or they might get angry.  Good.  Let them get angry.  It's about time somebody stood up for inherent individual rights and made the Islamic terrorists angry.  God knows, ain't nobody in the US Congress or the Obama Administration standing up for our rights.  In fact, Obama and Congress are both destroying our freedoms left and right, except for a few Tea Party Libertarians such as Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

--  Thur Apr 30, 2015  President Obama popped onto national TV to tell everybody that the cause of the riots in Baltimore is lack of enough social, education, and jobs funding by Congress.  Really?  Let's look at this assertion.  According to reporter/analyst Michelle Malkin, Obama and the Liberals in 2009 rammed an $840 billion "stimulus" package through Congress to ha-ha "stimulate" the economy.  Right.  Counterfeiting the money supply is now called a "stimulus."  Perhaps none of that trillion dollar pork made it to Baltimore, ya think?  $64 billion went to public school districts; $50 billion went for "other education" porky pig programs, including $13 billion for low-income public school kids, $4.1 billion for Head Start and other babysitting services so mom and dad could wheel and deal drugs down at the corner of Walk and Don't Walk without being bothered by little Johnny or Suzie, one of about six of unwed Mommy's children, $650 million for educational technology like how to turn the pages of a book or log onto the Internet with a cell phone, $200 million to working college kids forking over $33,000 per year for a degree in Underwater Basket Weaving and wondering why they can't get a job, and $70 million for homeless children, the same children whose moms and dads are selling crack down at Filth and Main.  On the jobs welfare front, Obama distributed $230 billion of money looted from American taxpayers for "shovel ready" jobs which did not exist.  $26 billion went to Big Labor Unions for an EduJobs program.  The feds already had 47 jobs programs funded by nine different federal agencies.  The federal robbers in each agency must have been tripping all over each other's shoelaces performing the same bureaucratic bull$hit in quadruplicate.  In 2014, Obama cranked up another $1 billion for early childhood education for kids aged birth to five.  Right after Obama's $1 trillion booty distribution in 2009, he created a SERVE America Act to dispense another $6 billion, $1.1 billion for "investment in national America services," $97 million for Learn and Serve America Youth Engagement Zones -- whatever the Hell that means -- and $400 million for the Social Innovation and Volunteer Generation Fund.  Ditto, what does that mean?   Apparently somebody hijacked Maryland's portion of all this loot on its way to Baltimore?

--  Wed Apr 29, 2015  Race riots continue in Baltimore, Maryland, as President Obama urges the rioters to continue demonstrating peaceably because, as he states on national TV, "there is racial inequality that still exists all across America."   So, outside agitators, taking their clue from our clueless leader, continue throwing rocks and bricks at the police, burning down senior citizen homes and small businesses, and bust open windows of liquor and other retail stores to steal bottles of booze, TVs, and other items.  Like, President Obama and the DOJ had no idea that their little race-baiting sycophants such as Al Sharpton and other paid outside agitators wouldn't burn down the city of Baltimore as they did Ferguson for the same ridiculous reasons.  Never let a good crisis go to waste, right?  So, what's really going on in Baltimore, Maryland?  As FOX reporter Bill O'Reilly stated on national TV last night, here are the ethnic crime stats for Baltimore:  90% of the murders committed in Baltimore are committed by blacks; 90% of the victims of murder in Baltimore are committed by blacks; 80% - 90% of the robberies, assaults, rapes, looting, and general crime in Baltimore are committed by blacks; 80% or more of the victims of all crime committed in Baltimore are blacks; blacks constitute 65% of the population of Baltimore; the Mayor of Baltimore is black; the majority of the Baltimore City council is black; the police chief of Baltimore is black and the majority of the police department is black; the Maryland House Majority Leader is a black woman.  Hmmm, does this sound like we have a RACIAL problem in Baltimore, OR... is something else going on?  And Baltimore is not unique in its ethnic crime statistics.  Chicago, New York, LA, Oakland, Washington DC, and other large cities report similar ethnic crime stats.  Why?  What is the cause for the high ethnic crime rate, besides the fact that the majority of the residents -- vics and perps -- are both black?   What other factors exist?  One of the main factors is that the federal and state governments have intervened into the lives of the inner city residents with a "War on Poverty."  Yes, a War on Poverty.  The left Liberals in America are now witnessing the results of altruistic state collectivism, socialism, social welfare programs consisting of food stamps, aid to single moms with tons of children, "free" medical care, and all sorts of government welfare.  Thus, the War on Poverty has created exactly the opposite of what the left Liberals in America anticipated:  namely, that socialism can solve poverty when, in actuality, socialism creates poverty.  It also creates lots of crime as everybody tries to respond to the government to become as impoverished as they can be in order to collect free government welfare.  Women try to have as many babies as possible; the more children the more government money.  Women strive to not get married; single household women with lots of children receive more government money; hence, children grow up with NO FATHERS.  Coupled with the government's War on Drugs -- which is a national joke and doesn't work -- youths in the ghettoes quickly find out they can make more money dealing in drugs than obtaining an education.  Coupled with the War on Poverty (socialism) and the War on Drugs is the War on Education, namely the government's implementation of a federally controlled Public -- i.e. socialist -- Education System.  Youths in the ghetto do not take Public Education seriously, and therefore don't attend, because it doesn't pay as much as dealing in drugs relative to the expended output of time and energy.  In short, governmental intervention into America's major cities with welfare handouts has been a total failure and President Obama and his race baiters causing riots all over America want you to believe that the solution is for everybody to hold hands, sing cumbayah, and the federal government should continue playing socialist welfare games.  Blaming it on white police doesn't work any more because the majority of many city police departments are black.  Now what?  Instead of President Obama -- an economic village idiot of the first degree -- urging for a return to free market capitalism, he, instead, proposes more and more welfare socialism, keeping inner city blacks under the government's thumb and obtaining more and more government power for the bureaucrats in Washington DC who are happy to receive huge salaries for mismanaging all their Wars on Everything.  No wonder the people in Baltimore are rioting.  They've been set up for this outcome by the government.  The War on Poverty has turned into its only logical social and economic outcome:  a Poverty War.  And the only reason race riots don't -- or historically didn't  -- break out in heavily socialistic cities in Europe such as Germany, the USSR, Latin America such as Cuba, and Indonesia such as China, and North Korea is because those governments not only implement socialism but they also mow down any would be rioters with automatic machine guns, Nazi Brown Shirts, and horrendous prison systems and Concentration Camps.  Is that where America is headed, because the so-called "race riots" in cities like Baltimore, which are really government socialist welfare riots, are not going to be solved by holding hands, marching down Main Street singing cumbayah, and the federal government passing out more "free" cookies.  One last thing:  from where does the government obtain all these "free" cookies if not from law-abiding producers in the free market?  And, is that exactly what the Obama Administration is trying to destroy:  the American Middle Class, the Fountainhead of economic productivity because Daddy Obama was a card-carrying Communist?  Are things starting to make sense now?  Things starting to fall into place?  Yes, this is a war of ideas, of objective moral philosophy:  inherent individual rights and responsibilities vs. state collectivism.

--  Sun Apr 26, 2015  Ah yes, tonight's White House Correspondence dinner, more like the White House's Laugh-a-Minute Republican Roasting dinner, which was far, far removed from anything funny.  What a spectacle.  Hundreds out of 2,600 general attendees including journalists, politicians, movie stars and businessmen attended a dinner hosted by President Barack Obama and members of the WH Press Corps applauded at what has to be the lowest level of non-intellectual and social political economic immorality ever put on by our 4th Branch of Government:  namely, the left Liberal drive-by media.  Here is the group that is supposedly protecting our First Amendment Rights of Freedom of Speech, but instead of holding an adult discussion of journalism and freedom of speech, this group of WH correspondents and the President of the United States celebrated themselves by lowering the format and content of their celebration dinner down to the level of welfare ghetto speak and out and out grammatically-twisted use of the "F" word in an attempt to parody and mock America's foundational documents and concepts of freedom with regard to Obama's recent illegal executive actions.  To wit:  Obama said he was asked, in regard to the 4th quarter of his presidency, whether he had a "bucket list."  He said his response was "no" but he had something that rhymed with the word "bucket," after which he paused long enough for the audience to understand that he meant a "Fu$k it" list.  Many people laughed.  Some did not.  Obama continued, and said, so when people questioned whether it was legal for him to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, he said, "Buck it," meaning of course, "Fu$k it."  He continued this play on words referring to his other illegal actions, unconstitutional actions, and said his answers were, "Buck it."  Some people didn't laugh.  Many in the audience appeared to be appalled that the President of the United States would stoop so low.  Playing on words to lower oneself down to gutter language was not the worse part.  The worse part was lowering one's intellectual level (Obama's) of trashing the foundational concepts of our limited constitutional government down to the level of "fundamentally transforming America" to a socialist dictatorship.  Remember that Obama stated on national TV over 25 times that it would be unconstitutional for a president to unilaterally grant amnesty to illegal aliens, and then he did exactly that, in an act of "Buck it" which he meant as, "Fu$k it" -- clearly slapping the US Constitution right in the face.  Those who laughed should be ashamed of themselves.  After roasting every Republican candidate running for the 2016 presidency -- is that the job of the president and White House Press Corps?  is that a topic for them to celebrate? -- President Obama then introduced an alter ego "rage" interpreter (a black actor) to stand behind him and translate into the microphone everything Obama said into "rage" talk as if that was what Obama really meant.  So, Obama babbled his standard platitudes to the WH Press Corps and his alter ego "rage" actor re-stated Obama's words into stereotyped black ghetto language for the audience.  So when Obama said something such as, "I'm glad everybody here at the Press Corps dinner..." became, "All you white people better grab yo little white asses and..."  and it went downhill from there.  What was supposed to be funny, turned out to be a highly racist stereotype rapping "rant" that was not very funny at all.  Imagine Obama talking to the audience using the stereotypical language of Amos and Andy, but updated to today's hip-hop recording rants.  And this was the level of journalistic intellectualism and racist immorality put on at tonight's White House Correspondence dinner.  Imagine if former President George Bush or Ronald Regan had done the same thing from a white racist point of view.  They probably would have been impeached.  The upshot was that Obama soon went into a fake rage himself and said the same type of things that the black actor was saying and then the black actor walked over to Michelle Obama and uttered, "He crazy..."  After Obama's gutter talk, some lady comedian from Saturday Night Live finished the evening by even more roasting of all the Republican candidates for the 2016 presidency, throwing a couple of doggy bon-bon ha-ha's pretending to roast a couple of Democrats, too.  Of special note was how Obama's speech writers zeroed in on all of his supposed "conspiracy theory" issues such as where he was born, smoking dope, and being gay in Chicago, in order to cover them up by openly making fun of them.  A clever debating trick used by lawyers:  confessing the truth by pretended denial.  How intellectual, this WH Press Corps dinner.  One wonders why attendees such as Donald Trump and GOP Congressmen/women did not stand up and walk out the room when Obama went through his "Fu$k it" comedy routine and his fake alter ego racist "rage" actor routine.  Is that how low our American culture has dropped, that those who are supposedly the intellectuals and protectors of the concepts of our foundational documents can think of no better way to celebrate their so-called journalistic activities than to lower themselves down to gutter talk, gutter actions, and state collectivist gutter concepts?  No wonder the US is in such a sad state of national and international affairs.  Look at our leaders; look at our journalists.  Enough said.  You be the judge.

--  Fri Apr 24, 2015  News Flash!!  Bill and Hillary Clinton sold America to Russia for $145 million -- plus $500,000 in speaking fees for Slick Willy.  That's right, $500,000 in "speaking fees."  Adding insult to injury, Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees -- hardy har har har, "speaking fees?" -- from a Canadian bankers' investment meeting in Alphabet-stan (spelled Russian boot licker) where the Clintons and Russian attendees applauded the transfer of control of 20% of the Uranium mined in the United States.  Not only was this Uranium deal illegal according to US law, Hillary Clinton signed off that this deal was AOK while she was Sec of State.  She was not the only signer.  Sec of Defense and others signed off on this sell-out of American Uranium to our enemies in direct contradiction to not only the current law but also a signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that Sec of State Hillary Clinton and others signed at the start of their term with the Obama Administration.  Which also begs the question:  why hasn't the Obama Administration brought these activities to the American people's attention since President Obama knew, or should have known, about the Uranium deal and other illegal transactions as they were posted -- according to the Clintons -- all over the Clinton's Foundation Web Site?  And since it has now been revealed, why hasn't Obama said anything about this illegal activity, i.e., selling a 20% interest in control of US Uranium commodities which can be used to make nuke bombs, by his Sec of State, Hillary Clinton?  While the controlling interest of 20% of the mined Uranium from the United States was sold, one must remember that Vladimir Putin's purchase of this Canadian company now amounts to a 51% majority control of the company by Russia.   In essence, Bill and Hillary Clinton just sold a 51% majority control of a Canadian mining company that itself controls 20% of America's Uranium, a sizable amount that can be used by Russia to make yellowcake, the nuclear material used to further make nuclear weapons.  Further, Russia has hinted at possibly sending Uranium to:  yep, you guessed it:  IRAN, along with the ICBM's they are sending to the terrorist Mullahs in the Middle East.  That means that Bill and Hillary Clinton, and President Obama, are essentially negotiating deals with Russia and Iran in allowing Iran to develop nuclear bombs.   Where is the Dept of Justice's US Attorney General Eric Holder in all of this hullabaloo regarding the activities of Bill and Hillary Clinton through their Clinton Foundation?  No wonder Hillary Clinton, as Sec of State, ran her own private computer system for emails and other communication instead of using an approved secure government system.  She needed to be able to hide and destroy all of her crap.  And then, when ordered by US Congressional committees to provide her emails to the State Dept to determine which emails should be deleted, Clinton refused and, in fact, revealed that she had already deleted some 30,000 of the 60,000 emails transacted by her during her tenure as Sec of State, an action not within her authority to perform.  And this is what the left Liberal Democrats have brought to the American people.  Subsidizing America's demise on every front possible, both domestic and international.  Let's be clear about one thing:  these illegal and immoral activities by the Clintons and Obama are not examples of free market capitalism.  They are not "crony capitalism" either because there is no such thing as "crony capitalism."  As soon as the government participates in the deal -- namely, Sec of State Clinton and President Obama -- their activities reek of state collectivism, government intervention to help the players, socialism, fascism, communism, government dictatorship.  No way in hell do these activities represent free market capitalism.  Rather, they represent the money-grubbing greedy Clintons who are simple-minded socialists using government power of force and fraud to acquire their illegal cookies -- putting the rest of America and the world at risk of a civil war and/or WW III.  The Clintons and Obama, for all of their illegal activities should be thrown into jail and we should throw away the key.  Their actions are despicable, treasonous, and immoral as they continually undercut the entire philosophy of inherent individual rights and limited government upon which this country was built.  Welcome to state collectivism.  Who is John Galt?

--  Fri Apr 24, 2015  Republican Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Thad Cochran (Miss.), Susan Collins (Maine), Jeff Flake (Ariz.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Orrin Hatch (Utah), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) joined Senate Democrats in approving the nomination of Loretta Lynch as the next US Attorney General.  The vote was 56 - 43 and the big question is:  why would these Republicans vote for a DOJ leader who appears to be at least as bad as current DOJ leader Eric Holder?  In fact, rumor has it that Loretta Lynch is a close buddy buddy of -- you guessed it -- Eric Holder's wifester.  Look for more of the same INJUSTICE from the new DOJ as we've already experienced from the current DOJ Eric Holder.  In 2016, don't forget to go to the polls and vote OUT the above 10 RINOs if they, indeed, are running for office at that time.

--  Sun Apr 19, 2015  Dept of Homeland Security Director, Ms. Dinkleberry Leonhart, testified before Senator Mike Lee's Committee in Congress the other day that she could not reprimand, fire, or slap upside the head, DEA agents who are working for her.  Really?  Who's in charge at the DHS anyway?  Mickey Mouse?  Donald Duck?  And what did Ms. Leonhart's DEA agents do that was so wrong?  Well, it seems that various agents have been humping and partying down with prostitutes provided by major drug cartels in foreign countries for the last umpteen years.  In addition, the drug cartels hosting said parties have also been kind enough to "watch" the DEA agents' cell phones (copying addresses), "watch" the DEA agents' laptop computers (snooping into what cases the agent are working on), and "watch" the DEA agents' firearms (making sure they don't work correctly or oiling them up with molasses) while the horny agents were dashing through hotel corridors playing 50 shades of grey with the hired hookers.  Asked of Ms. Leonhart by Senator Trey Gowdey, "So, what the hell do you do if not manage the Dept of Homeland Security?  What do you mean that you can't fire agents who have violated the DHS's rules of conduct?"  Ms. Leonhart's answer:  "Duh... , I dunno... collecting my paycheck from Obama?"  Well, folks, that makes about 3 or 4 heads of Obama's departments, Lois Lerner at the IRS who got off on violating targeted audits of GOP political rivals, DOJ jokester Eric Holder who has been cited for contempt and general wrong doings by the US Congress for not doing his job plus helping to start race riots across America, and the list goes on and on in this current administration.  What's next?  Is Obama going to quarter Nazi Brown Shirts in every citizens' home to make sure they eat Michelle's high carb diet so we can all grow big butts like the First Lady?  Under President Obama's wonderful "intentions" the nation is going to hell in a hand basket, destroying the entire Middle Class, expanding the Caliphate war in the Middle East AND Europe, and totally wrecking America's health care system.  There is now no law, no justice, and no management of any government workers in the current administration.  It's an Executive Dept free-for-all.  America's social, political, and economic structure of limited government, checks and balances, and free market capitalism is rapidly breaking down -- just like Obama and his socialist Commies have planned all along.  In the long run, however, if the GOP doesn't take back the government in 2016 and re-establish some sense of rational order, Obama and his Muslim terrorist-leaning apologists will be at the top of ISIS's hit list.  And Obama thought he would be applauded with open arms by the Iranians and the other Islamic terrorists if he capitulated to all of their terrorist demands to allow them to make nuclear bombs.  There's a sucker born every minute.  Unfortunately, one of them landed in the Oval Office and is now, like the Pied Piper, leading the youth of America down the path to socialist Hell.  And if he doesn't finish the job of destroying America, you can bet Hilarious Clinton will.

--  Sun Apr 12, 2015  Yeaaa, lying former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton announced today that she is running for the President of the United States.  Just what the Republicans wanted.  Hillbilly Clinton should be so easy to whip in the 2016 presidential elections that a blithering village idiot with his left brain tied behind his back should have no problem beating her.  Meanwhile, President Barack Obama is in Panama meeting with the other dictators of the world, pretending that Fidel and brother Raoulie Castro -- the Laurel and Hardy of Cuba -- are just a coupla wonderful guys and it's big bad America's fault that the Cuban government has been murdering, torturing, raping, and throwing the Cuban people into jail by the tens of thousands over the last 5 decades.  So, Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong, ignoring history, thinks he is opening up Cuba and freeing all the people who have been oppressed by the US by lifting economic sanctions.  Really?  Typical of most American Progressives, they blame America for what ails socialist countries rather than blaming socialism itself.  The problem is not America; the problem is that Fidel Castro is a murderous dictator who has steadfastly refused to allow Cubans to exercise their inherent rights of freedom.  Lifting economic sanctions against the Cuban government does not help the Cuban people.  It helps the Cuban dictators continue their reign of terror against the Cuban people.  The best thing that Obama should promote is a revolution for freedom in Cuba and the establishment of a US-style Constitution with a Bill of Rights, not lifting economic sanctions that help brothers Fidel and Raoul Castro.  As usual, Obama has it bassackwards... again... .

--  Sun Apr 05, 2015  Happy Easter to all the Christians in the world.  After all the hullaballoo surrounding last week's Indiana Law to protect the rights of Christians and other religious groups to be able to go to court to argue their right to choose to not participate in gay marriage ceremonies -- or any other morally objectionable practice, like baking a cake for Nazi's or the KKK -- Christians deserve to take a spring break and hold Easter Egg Hunts for their kids today.  The left Liberal Gay Group that blasted some poor little pizza parlor that said they (the pizzeria) would have to refuse to participate on religious grounds in holding a gay wedding reception on their premises, were summarily blasted themselves as the mainstream news media tried to spread the news.  Then, the mainstream media were blasted as the majority of Americans said, "Leave the Christian pizza parlor alone!"  After which Americans sent over a million dollars in donations to the little pizza parlor to help them rebuild from the onslaught of the Gay Special Rights Group that had obviously overstepped their bounds -- and the First Amendment.  Those who stood around in the street and chanted that all businesses must cater to and participate in acts that said businesses consider morally reprehensible looked like a bunch of zombies who just didn't get the Memo that the US Constitution protects individuals and their religions from governmental mandates to perform actions reprehensible to their religious beliefs.  The right to choose, the right to morally discriminate, the right to make a morally conscious decision on one's private property -- as long as one does not initiate the use of force or fraud against others -- is covered as an inherent right in the First Amendment.  Gays, Blacks, the KKK, NAZI's, and the public at large DO NOT have the right to force others to do whatever Gays, Blacks, the KKK, NAZI's, and the public at large demand.  Individuals have rights.  There are no special Gay rights, or Black rights, or Latino rights, or gender rights, or any other GROUP rights because the concept of rights is not a collective concept, it is an individual concept.  All of the above groups fall under the category of INDIVIDUAL RIGHTs and thus they should stand up for individual rights, not tribal, mob, or group collectivist rights.  Joining together with like-minded people is OK, but joining together with like-minded people and demanding special GROUP rights is to miss the point of rights philosophy in the first place.  That's why our Constitution speaks of individual rights, and why we implemented a limited Republic instead of a Democracy with democratic majority rule.  The Founding Fathers were very clear about this distinction in the Federalist Papers.  The Gay Left Liberal Group that overstepped their bounds last week should re-read the Federalist Papers, if they've ever read them in the first place.  Today is also a good day for President Obama and Sec of State John Kerry to put on their pink bunny suits and go on all the national TV talk shows to babble about how they created a non-framework, non-deal, between nobody in Iran to allow the Mullahs to keep on keeping on with their development of a nuclear bomb.  What a joke:  a non-Memorandum of non-Understanding.  That's like making a fake verbal deal with Harvey the Invisible White Rabbit.  This current administration is leaning so far over to the Islamic terrorists in Iran that they have baklava honey and Yellowcake dripping all over their fingertips.  Happy Easter Obama and Kerry.  Go hide those Easter Eggs for all the American kids you're busy lying to and setting up for a future WW III.

--  Sat Apr 04, 2015  Well pull up the barn floor and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends.  President Obama and Sec of State John Kerry have just declared that they've struck a "non-deal deal" with the Turban Terrorists of Iran.  Yes, indeedy-doody, a non-written, non-binding, Memorandum of Non-Understanding with the leading terrorist nation in the Middle East.  What are the imaginary terms of this imaginary Non Agreement?  Whatever either side pretends they want the non-terms to be or not to be.  And that is the question:  what the hell is going on?  The answer is:  nothing.  Actually, the real answer is:  whatever the Mullahs were already doing by lying, cheating, misleading, trickery, and oooh looky-looky at my right hand while I shaft you with my left hand.  That's what's going on in Iran.  The Mullahs, laughing in their tea at Obama and Kerry, are still manufacturing Yellowcake, still spinning their centrifuges, and still planning to crank up a nuclear bomb as soon as possible to destroy Israel and America.  And who says all the centrifuges have to reside in Iran?  The Mullahs could be working in multiple nuclear enrichment facilities in different countries to add all their Yellowcake together to make a nuke.  Who knows?  Certainly not the IAEA.  And certainly not Obama and Kerry.  Nobody even knew two months ago about Iran's hidden facility that is now cranking up Plutonium like there's no tomorrow, which, ironically is exactly what they're planning on:  no tomorrow for you and me and everybody else.  Word on the street is that Sec of State John Kerry is more interested in winning a Nobel Peace Prize -- temporary as it will be -- just for inking a "deal" with Iran, which he has yet to do in his latest Fairytale since nobody has signed off on anything.  Obama continues to claim that he will "veto" any Congressional legislation that votes "no" on The Big Unwritten Lying Deal With Iran.  But that's not how it works.  Treaties can be proposed by the Executive Branch, i.e. President Jarrett, oops I mean President Obama, but said "Treaty" -- which must be in writing so somebody can read it -- must be ratified by 2/3 of each House of Congress.  There is no "vetoing" of anything unless Congress writes a Bill.  If 2/3 of Congress tells President Valerie, I mean Barack, to take a long walk off a short pier, then the so-called "treaty" is nullified.  Nor does the President have the authority to authorize that the UN override the US Congress regarding America's treaties.  Once again, President Obaloney is trying to not only overstep his executive boundaries, he is obviously trying to put Israel and other nations at high risk for a WW III when the Mullahs renege on any non-deal deal that may be created.  Currently, Obama has already initiated removing of economic sanctions against Iran because he and Valerie Jarrett want to go shopping for camel side-saddles and whatnot in Teheren next summer.  Whatever.  The point is, Obama has already jumped the gun on removing sanctions that Congress previously passed.  Did anybody see the Hollywood propaganda machine in full regalia last night as staged groups of Iranians drove through the streets cheering and whooping it up as if a "real deal" had been struck between the US and the Turban Terrorists?  Meanwhile, President Barack Jarrett popped onto national TV and babbled like a French mime, saying nothing, stating that a non-Framework of a non-Memorandum of non-Understanding had been not-struck in invisible ink between Nobody and Harvey the Invisible White Rabbit.  And the mainstream news media, like clockwork, gobbled it up for breakfast.  Yum yum yum, nothing but hot air.  Why are we wasting our time in Switzerland playing Tiddly Winks with the Iranian Terrorists?  Because somebody's Daddy was a Muslim.

--  Thur Apr 02, 2015  The current hullaballoo about Indiana's Religious Rights legislation that was just signed into law is an attempt by the far left liberals to destroy the concept of individual rights while pretending that they are protecting individual rights.  There is no such thing as special individual rights for gays, for women, for blacks, or people with long purple noses.  The concept of inherent individual rights applies to individuals, not special sects, gangs, or tribes of individuals delineated by some attribute in addition to, or other than, being an individual per se.  As soon as one attributes an adjective to the concept of "individuals," they are not individuals in rights philosophy but rather they are now a special group.  One does not obtain inherent individual rights from Nature or God because one is gay, or because one is a woman, or because one is Christian, or because one has a long purple nose.  One obtains inherent individual rights because one is an "individual."  Note also that one does not obtain one's rights from the government, rather the government obtains its existence from the exercise of a priori inherent individual rights.  Therefore, from a true individual rights philosophy, one has the right to discriminate against anybody else for whatever reason as long as one does not initiate the use of physical force or fraud, and one is doing so within the bounds of one's own private property.  Nobody can discriminate against anybody else on public property, or government property such as down at the DMV.  So, if two KKK members in full white hoods walk into an African American's bakery and order him to bake them a "We hate black folks" chocolate cake, the owner of the bakery, regardless of the owner's personal attributes, has the right under inherent individual rights philosophy to say, "No, thanks."  Similarly, if two gay people walk into a bakery run by Christians who hold that gay sex is morally reprehensible to the owners, or for any other reason, and the gay couple demands that the bakers make a cake portraying a gay marriage on top of the frosting, the owners have the right to say, "No, thanks."  While the owners in the two examples above have the right to say no, I am not stating that they are exercising a smart decision or that I agree with their discretion.  The owners may lose lots of business and may go bankrupt but that is their decision.  The point is that it is not the function of the government or other individuals to initiate the use of force or fraud to force the owners to bake cakes that they do not want to make for any customers for any reasons, whether religious or racial or gender or the shape of the customer's nose.  Individuals have the inherent right to discriminate, to choose, for whatever reason whether it's stupidity from somebody else's point of view or not.  It may or may not be intelligent business-wise but it is their right to choose.  So, why all the hullaballoo by the left liberals on this issue?  As usual, the Democrats want to destroy the concept of inherent individual rights and replace it with government or state force.  At the conceptual level, liberals want to destroy the moral philosophy of inherent individual rights upon which the US Constitution was founded and replace it with the concept of tribal rule, gang rule, democratic majority force and fraud.  Instead of the rule of law, they want the rule of men.  The rule of the tribe.  It is a veiled attempt to lower Western Civilization back down to the Dark Ages of state collectivism and their dirty little secret is that the promulgators of these concepts against individual rights to discriminate, the right to choose, is to make you feel guilty.  They are pulling their same old stunt of attempting to gain the sanction of their victims:  you.  Instead, all individuals should exercise whatever good judgment their moral philosophy dictates without, of course, initiating the use of force or fraud against others.  The reason that the free market works is because there are always those who will gravitate to make exchanges with those whose moral philosophies they agree with.  As an aside, note how those who want to force their views on others at the bakeries in the above examples are actually carrying out the very same "discrimination" of which they accuse the bakers.  Republicans, Libertarians, and others need to face this question head on, and unequivocally point out that all individuals have the inherent right to "discriminate" in their choice of who they deal with -- which is what everybody does already in society when they choose their life's work, play time, and marriage.  Democrats and left liberals need to go back to Moral Philosophy 101A and stop trying to initiate another phony crisis for our phony President to hide behind while he perpetrates his high crimes and treason against the US.  If some Christian baker doesn't want to bake a gay themed cake for a couple of gays, that's the baker's right.  If a Jewish baker doesn't want to bake a Nazi-themed cake for a Nazi socialist couple with a big swastika on top, that's the baker's right to choose.  If an Afro American baker doesn't want to bake a wedding cake for a KKK couple showing the hanging of a black man on a tree with a burning cross on top, that's the baker's choice.  Moral discrimination is an inherent right.  Period.  Case closed.  And we don't need a bunch of RINOs in Washington or at the state governor's level to stand up on national TV and babble nonsense about how everybody should learn to get along, how they're going to create special categories of individuals to protect, and sing cumbayah.  By the way, what's this crap about special categories of hate crime?  It's the same claptrap from liberals as discussed above.  It doesn't matter why the crook robbed the 7-Eleven store and shot the clerk.  It is the act of initiating force or fraud against another individual that matters, not because the victim was black, or Jewish, or a woman, or had a long purple nose.  There should be no special categories of "hate crimes."  A crime against an individual is a crime against an individual.  Period.  Get the definitions of your individual rights philosophy logically correct. And what's this crap about groups such as Congress' Black Caucus or Latino Caucus or White Caucus or Purple Nose Caucus which should have no place in government, especially in Congress?  There are no gay rights; or black rights; or women's rights; or Christian rights.  There are only individual rights and you have the right to choose who you deal with.  Period.

--  Sun Mar 29  It is sheer folly for the Obama administration to pretend that it can make a nuclear "deal" with the Mullahs of Iran.  First, check your premises.  Axiomatic Primary of Iran's leaders:  it is OK to lie to the infidels.  Agreements between infidels are not binding and, in fact, are suggested ways in which to achieve the objectives of the Islamic terrorists:  i.e., establish an Islamic Caliphate to take over all of planet Earth.  Bonus:  blow up the entire planet while implementing the Islamic Caliphate and -- according to Islamic moral philosophy -- ensure that one reaches Muslim Heaven, plus 72 virgins, plus lots of baklava with honey and dates, and... whatever.  Therefore -- think about this President Obama -- it is a given premise that NO LOGICAL RATIONAL DEAL can be made with the Mullahs of Iran because if one's primary givens are false, then the results must be false.  False premises yield false results.  In every field of endeavor, from math to engineering to social political economic philosophy.  The Big Question is:  why does Obama persist in going down an irrational political path?  Is he suicidal?  Does he think the Mullahs will love him and spare his ass when they blow up Israel, America, and planet Earth?  What is going through President Obama's tiny little brain that he can't comprehend that 2 + 2 = 4 in the realm of social political economics?  The answer is that there is no rational answer because Obama's premises are not rational.  Therefore, he -- whether he knows it consciously or not -- is on a suicidal mission and he is willing to take the rest of the world with him as he lives out his short socialist fantasy.  Let's face it, Obama is living out a 200 year old economic fairytale called Marxism and he wants to drag the rest of America with him to discover what we already know:  the false economic sophisms of socialism -- labor theory of value, zero sum wealth, etc. -- all of which were disproved over a hundred years ago.  And let's also face the fact that Marx's socialist state is the same moral philosophy as Iran's Mullahs socialist religious state.  No wonder it is so easy for Obama to slip into the same moral philosophy of altruistic state collectivism of socialism and Islamic terrorism.  Both deny the existence of inherent individual rights, especially women's rights in the Middle East, and both worship the collectivist state.  That explains why Obama is busy running around America talking up a storm about how wonderful state collectivism will be in the US, such as socialist medical care, and simultaneously how he can make a nuclear "deal" with Islamic terrorist state collectivists in the Middle East.  It's the same moral philosophy:  stupid state collectivism.  Except for one thing:  Obamacare will not blow up planet Earth; but a fake nuclear "deal" with Iran will.  The only saving grace may be that those who follow Billy Meier and his human ET contacts, the Plejaran, know that said Plejaran will not allow the total blowing up of planet Earth with nukes because -- their words, not mine -- planet Earth happens to exist in a section of one of the Milky Way Galaxy's spiral arms connected to other human ET's in our space-time continuum and they would be adversely affected if the Bozos on Earth actually blew up the entire planet.  Short of that, however, the use of chemical, biological, conventional, and limited nuclear warfare will be, well, just tough luck for Earth humans and nobody on or off planet will be coming to our rescue.  Let's hope that President Dumb-Dumb gets impeached before he can do much more harm than he has already done at home and in the Middle East.  So what's the solution?  The US and other nations such as Britain, France, Australia, and Israel need to join together and simply march into Iran and tell the Iranian leaders to clear out the scientists from their un-needed "secret" nuclear facilities while said united nations completely dismantle the Iranian nuclear facilities.  No need to blow up Iranians, they want and have asked for the US to free them from their Mullahs.  If that doesn't happen, if the US leadership and a coalition of other nations don't step up to the plate with a pair of cajones, prepare for the unleashing of nuclear bombs by the Islamic terrorists in the very near future.  Remember, it's OK to lie to us infidels, including lying to President Obama and his Iranian Mommy, Valerie Jarrett, who are simply regarded as useful idiots in the Mullahs' overall Game Plan to take over the world.  Worse bad news dukie would be the Islamic terrorists additionally marching into France, and with the five million disenfranchised jobless Muslims living in the NO GO Zones of Paris, take over France's military and nuclear arsenal and blow up half of Europe as they implement their Caliphate throughout Europe.  Wake up England, you're next on the Mullahs' List.  Meanwhile, Russia's Putin is licking his chops and is contemplating how to take over portions of Northern Europe and then Canada and Alaska while America is going broke trying to fight the Islamic terrorists in the Middle East.  Think it can't happen?  Think again, Americans.  Obama the Pied Piper is leading the youth of America down the path to total economic obliteration.  That's why he talks every day at a different college campus in America:  to convince the stupid youth that Marxism and Islamic terrorism are simply figments of the Conservatives' imaginations.  Meanwhile, the old line Conservatives are RINOs, scratching their heads, trying to figure out what's going on in the world in between maintaining their elegant outrageous lifestyle in Washington DC.  Why can't the US Congress spell I-M-P-E-A-C-H?

--  Thur Mar 26, 2015  News Flash!!  The US Military announced yesterday that PRIVATE Bergdahl has now been charged with (1) deserting his post on the battle field, and (2) putting his platoon and the military in harms way when he left his post and went wandering off to search out a meeting and joining up with Al Qaeda/Taliban/Middle East terrorists.  This was a conscious decision as PRIVATE Bergdahl asked his Platoon leaders how to pack up and ship his personal belongings home, which he did, the day before he deserted his post.  This was a conscious decision as PRIVATE Bergdahl voluntarily joined the US Military -- after failing to join the French Foreign Legion -- and then decided that he didn't like the way the US Military was conducting the war in Iraq.  Not that he was a pacifist; he didn't like the door-to-door meetings and discussion with the locals.  He wanted more action.  Not that he wanted to kill people but that he wanted, according to his Platoon buddies, more running around the countryside, hopping, skipping, jumping, and zip-lining all over the place.  Maybe he should have joined the Olympics, who knows.  But one doesn't voluntarily join the Army, take an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States, and then decide on the battle field to play Commander in Chief -- or more like Benedict Arnold -- and then dash off to join the enemy while his comrades think he is standing guard to protect them as they did for him while he slept.  This is not the action of a hero or somebody serving his country with "honor and distinction" as the Obama Administration claimed on national TV talk shows.  This is the action of a lying coward, and is a court-martial offense if not a firing squad on the battle field.  Kudos to the US Military for not caving in and playing politics with the Obama Administration that tried to get the Military top brass to dismiss the charges and pretend like nothing happened, move along, nothing going on here.  Yeah, uh-huh.  The really sad part of this entire Obama Bergdahl fiasco is that 6 soldiers were killed in the initial search for Bergdahl as the US Military thought he may have been captured or led off post.  Very shortly, however, they discovered he purposely deserted and the Taliban was, with Bergdahl's help, tricking our soldiers who were trying to save him by leading them into houses that blew up and ambushes in which our soldiers were killed.  All this, as President Obama choreographed a phony baloney Rose Garden charade during which he hugged, kissed, and put his arms around Bergdahl's parents when Obama announced his Big Trade to bring Berdahl home in exchange for releasing the five worst terrorist commanders at Gitmo so they could then go back into the Middle East fight against Israel, America, and anybody else they targeted.  This was probably one of the most shameful acts of treason and showboating by any US Commander in Chief, ever, in US history.  And to top it off, Bergdahl's father stood in the Rose Garden, speaking in Arabic, and praised his son's despicable act of desertion as President Obama -- the Commander in Chief -- smiled on like it was some kind of birthday party for a two year old.  On the first count, Bergdahl could get five years in prison.  On the second count, he could get life in prison.  Nobody at the White House mentioned the 6 soldiers who died searching for Bergdahl.  They will not be coming home -- except in a coffin.

--  Tue Mar 24, 2015  Tum tee tum tum twiddle thumbs.  What is Hilarious Clinton waiting for?  She's finished as a candidate for the 2016 presidency.  She should be duly prosecuted for her blatant violation of security protocol vis a vis running her Sec of State communications in the clear on her own hackable private servers at her home instead of on the official more secure servers mandated by the government.  Congressional Democrats are no doubt sitting in their back offices smoking Cuban cigars and drinking fine Scotch whiskey as they plan how exactly to dump her and choose another one or two candidates to run in the 2016 Presidential Elections.  It's over, Hillbilly.  It's over.  The sooner you wake up and admit this to yourself, the sooner you can take a long vacation to Sing-Sing Prison after your federal conviction and talk trash with all the other inmates who only robbed a 7-Eleven store instead of putting the entire US population at risk with your buddy President Obama.  Speaking of Obama, have you stopped to ask yourself:  is he going to throw you under the bus before you throw him under the bus?  Now's there's a political wrestling match that the public deserves to see on national TV.  If you do nothing, Obama wins and you lose anyway.  If you squeal on him, you both lose but you may be granted immunity for a coupla weeks as you tell the truth about what the hell the President and his Puppet Master Valerie Jarrett from Iran have been orchestrating over the past 6 years or more.  Just think, girl friend, you have a chance to redeem yourself.  Well, sort of.  But not enough to think you can then run for the 2016 presidency.  Nope, that option is long gone.  And, guess what, you get to help drag President Obama through his impeachment proceedings in the House and then trial in the Senate.  All you have to do is to stop your Big Denial because even the left Liberal Progressives in Congress are not going to let you continue to get away with... what?... murder...? treason...?  gun running...? what?  who knows?  Why not come clean now instead of being forced to make a fool of yourself on public TV during all the Congressional hearings?  Tum tee tum tum twiddle thumbs... Just waiting...

--  Thur Mar 19, 2015  Once again, President Obama demonstrates that he does not understand the concept of "inherent individual rights."  Yesterday, while on his perpetual never-ending forever-and-ever campaign trail, Obama said it should be a requirement that every citizen be forced to vote.  Really?  Forced to vote?  What part of the word FREEDOM does President Obama not understand?  Freedom means choice.  It means the choice to vote or not to vote.  If the government can force you to vote, then it can force you to do anything because to accept the proposition of no inherent individual right of choice in one endeavor is to accept the proposition of no inherent individual right of choice in any other endeavor.  Such as freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion, freedom of you name it.  Plus, the concept of "inherent" means you don't get your inherent individual rights from a government; you get it by the mere fact of being born, or of conception at some point in that process.  Forcing citizens to vote is the same as forcing citizens to, hey, how about purchasing a government health care program?  Wowie zowie!  What a coincidence.  Obama The Messiah has already tried to shove a forced GOVERNMENT health care program down everybody's throats.  Force is not the answer to obtaining the best, cheapest, most comprehensive health care system.  Inherent individual rights, a true free market, not the fake free market that existed before Obamacare, is the correct route to go.  We need to "force" every American to vote like we need another hole in our heads.  Go back to sleep, Obama, you still don't get it, dude.  Better yet, why not retire before you get impeached?

--  Thur Mar 19, 2015  News Flash!!  BiBi Netanyahu kicks derriere in Israeli election for Prime Minister.  Despite all the efforts by the Obama Administration to politically sabotage the Israeli elections, Benjamin Netanyahu won a landslide victory to continue as Israel's PM for the next two years.  The very issue that President Obama accused Netanyahu and the US Congress of doing, namely involving themselves in the election process of a foreign government by asking Netanyahu to come speak to the US Congress and American people regarding the Bad Deal that Obama was about to enter into with Iran vis a vis granting Iran a clear path to obtaining nukes, is EXACTLY what Obama and his cohorts did themselves by DIRECTLY involving themselves into the election process in Israel last week.  I mean, Obama's thugs showed up to Israel and openly campaigned against Bibi Netanyahu.  Too bad for Obama that his obvious intervention in Israel's election process backfired and actually boosted the votes FOR Netanyahu because even "Liberals" in Israel understand that any deal with Iran is a joke and Israel's life depends upon it.  In typical Obama style, he continually does exactly what he accuses his opponents of doing.  He plays the race card while accusing others of being racist.  He claims he has no constitutional authority to allow illegal immigrants into the United States while issuing EOs and Memo to allow 5 million to 10 million illegal immigrants to storm across our southern border, receive entitlements, and transport said illegals to live in suburbs all over America.  And so it goes, on and on, President Obama doing exactly what he accuses his opponents of doing.  Why?  To keep the citizens of America CONTINUALLY wrapped up in all kinds of concocted civil strife.  Just when you think you've caught President Obama creating one issue of civil strife, his administration creates another issue.  It just keeps going on and on AND THIS IS NO ACCIDENT.  This is the guerilla warfare he learned from his communist teachers, right out of the Saul Alinsky Playbook on How To Rip Down A Nation.  And it works, up to a point, depending on how soon the victims discover what is happening to them, what is really going on behind the scenes.  Add to that, we have a President and his puppet masters such as Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian Islamic terrorist sympathizer, pushing Obama in the direction of supporting the Islamic fanatics raging all over the Middle East slitting people's throats and burning them alive.  Not to mention openly selling women and girls as sex slaves in various Middle East markets.  So where are all the Left Liberal Progressive Democrats in the US, not standing up for women's rights?  Why don't they question President Obama's foreign policies that support such abhorrent sex slavery behavior?  Because they only think in terms of disconnected thought globs and that is why you see every major news outlet wringing their hands and bemoaning their grief about Bibi Netanyahu winning by a landslide the office of PM in Israel yesterday.  Democrats are incapable of connecting a rational thought process of what Obama is doing to America and what is going on in the Middle East.  That's why Obama did not -- and perhaps may never -- call Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu and offer congratulations on winning the election that Obama tried through direct intervention to make Bibi lose.  Shameful.  Say, Valerie Jarrett, how's it going, babe?  Is your puppet falling down?  Is Hillary clipping your strings?

--  Wed Mar 18, 2015  Hesto presto!  Hillary Clinton did not sign Form OF-109, as mandated by law, when she left her job as Sec of State.  Or, at least nobody at the State Dept can find it.  Therefore, Ms. Clinton, for two years has violated her exit stage left.  Wait, claims the State Dept.  The State Dept has claimed that they also cannot find signed Form OF-109 for the previous two Secs of State, Candy Cane Rice and Gen Colin Powell, too.  Whoa, so if two previous Secs of State have missing forms, then it's OK for Hilarious Clinton to not have signed her OF-109 form, too?  What if the previous two Secs of State robbed Bank of America?  Is it then OK for former Sec of State Clinton to rob Bank of America, too?  The more people who commit a crime, the less of a crime it becomes?  Let's stick to the point.  Hillary Clinton ran all State Dept communications on her private server, which is a violation of national security because her server could be hacked by foreign intelligence agents.  Her server was not a secure line.  Ms. Clinton mixed classified communications with private communications.  A big no-no in the intelligence community.  Ms. Clinton willfully chose and destroyed whatever emails and other State Dept communications she desired.  All of the above are felonies and she should be dutifully prosecuted.  But here's the coup de grace:  He or She who violates the provisions of form OF-109, including failure to sign said form, can not only be fined and sent to prison, DUM DA DUM, pay close attention now:  THEY CANNOT HOLD ANY FUTURE PUBLIC OFFICE.  Period.  Zip.  Zero.  End of story.  So, even if Secs of State Colin Powell and Condaleeza Rice did not sign form OF-109, that doesn't let Hillary Clinton off the hook.  It simply means the law applies to Powell and Rice, too.  In fact, doubly so because the Sec of State is in charge of making sure this law is carried out.  Period.  Zip.  Zero.  End of those guys' stories, too.  So, which laws do Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and anybody else in government service get to break?  How about election laws?  How about just suspending the Bill of Rights?  How about quartering soldiers in people's houses?  Where does it stop?  Is the excuse, "I just thought it didn't apply to me," OK?    or, "I just thought it would be more convenient if I did it my way," an OK reason?  The US government, especially the Executive Branch with Valerie Jarrett running Obama like a puppet and Hillary Clinton doing anything she feels like doing, has turned into a completely lawless joke.  If Hillary Clinton is not prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and if President Obama is not impeached for breaking every law imaginable, then the United States is no longer a Union, no longer a Republic, not longer a nation of laws.  Rather America has turned into a hodge-podge of tribal mob rule.  Rule by whoever carries the biggest gun.  What a giant step backwards in social political economics that would be.  Ayn Rand was absolutely correct in her assessment of the cause of America's continuing downfall:  altruistic state collectivism carried to its logical ultimate result, individual and national suicide.  Moral philosophy does matter, and we are watching it erode into Atlas Shrugged right before our eyes.

--  Sat Mar 14, 2015  FOX TV News talk show host Megyn Kelly has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain one simple form from the US State Dept:  Hillary Clinton's OF-109 form which Hillary was mandated by federal law to sign when she left her job as Sec of State two years ago.  Form OF-109 states under penalty of perjury that Ms. Clinton must sign off that she turned over ALL of her communications -- public and private -- to the State Dept upon leaving and the State Dept will then determine which communications, including emails, belong to the federal government and which communications can be taken home by Ms. Clinton.  Ms. Clinton has already publicly stated that she did not use a government server or computer during her entire four year term as Sec of State and that she only used her private communications system.  That's it, just one document being requested by FOX News host Megyn Kelly:  namely, Hillary Clinton's OF-109 form.  If Hillary did not sign a OF-109 form upon retiring from her Sec of State post, she and the US Dept of State are in serious trouble.  If Hillary did indeed sign a OF-109 form upon retiring from her Sec of State post, then the Big Question is:  where are all of her documents?  Did she destroy any of them?  If so, can they be recovered from either Hillary's private server or from recipients of her communications?  Were any of her communications classified documents?  Did she communicate and then destroy any classified documents with President Obama's White House administration?  Either way, Hillary Clinton is in deep trouble because she apparently willfully broke the law and that spells F-E-L-O-N-Y... one felony count for each missing document... .  And there are apparently tens of thousands of documents involved in this debacle.  That's a long time in prison for an arrogant, "Oh yeah, I just thought it was more 'convenient' to do everything on my own private server... you know, in case I needed to hide anything I didn't want the public to know about... ."  Really?  LIke what?  Like gun running with Obama to Al Qaeda terrorists that went awry in Benghazi, Libya and Syria, and resulted in the murder of our Libyan ambassador and three other people, not to mention the terrorists obtaining a billion dollars worth of American high tech weapons?  And then lying about it by blaming some idiot Hollywood Youtube video making fun of Mohammed?  Aiding Al Qaeda terrorists to fight Syrian terrorists and other groups could be construed as a treasonous act by President Obama and Sec of State Clinton.  Watch how fast Hillary drags down Obama as she goes down in this debacle.  No honor among thieves, right?  Let's all sing together, "Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for me..."

--  Thur Mar 12, 2015  Ah yes, Government Form OF-109.  That's the official form that former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton was supposed to have signed upon leaving her government position two years ago.  The form says, "Hey, bureaucrat, under penalty of perjury, you have to sign on the dotted line that you have given us (the government) all your communications, including emails, that you handled during your tenure as such-and-such a government employee.  And if you willfully refuse to do so, then you are committing a felony and can go to prison.  And, in addition, we (the government) are the ones -- not you, former Sec of State Hillbilly Clinton -- who get to decide what communications you can take with you and which ones you cannot."  If Hilarious Clinton did not sign Form OF-109 upon leaving her Sec of State job and for two years thereafter, then she and others at the State Dept have committed a crime.  If Hillbilly Clinton did sign Form OF-109, then the Big Question is:  so where are all the communications that you were supposed to turn over to the State Dept?  What?  Zero?  Let me get this straight.  Former Sec of State Ha-Ha Clinton worked for the State Dept as a Cabinet Member for President Barack Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong and during all those four years neither Clinton nor Obama sent any classified communications to each other?  Remember, Clinton only used her home-grown servers and computers for her emails and communication.  Clinton has admitted that she did not use any government secured communications equipment because it was "more convenient" that way.  Yeah, I bet it was.  Especially if one had something to hide.  Like Benghazi crap that she and Obama do not want the world to know about.  There were no emails between the White House and Sec of State for months -- that's months, unbelievable -- during the Benghazi crisis and aftermath.  She sent nothing to Obama during this time?  And he sent nothing to her?  Really?  So what messages was she sending?  Communications is not just a one way street.  Clinton was not talking to herself.  She was talking to President Obama.  And he must have sent messages to her.  Wow.  What a revelation.  Imagine, the President of the United States actually talking to his Sec of State.  Who'd a thunk?  So..... where are all the messages, Hillary?  Barack?  Classified and not classified?  Oh....  Hilarious Clinton deleted the ones she thought should be deleted and kept the ones she thought were OK to keep on her personal non-government server, whether said messages were classified or not?  Is there a new country existing inside the United States called Clintononia, with Dictator Hillary running her own show?  Is that how it works in Washington?  Is there another nation within America called Barack-a-rama-Obama in which Dictator Obama gets to do anything he wants and is exempt from the US Constitution, checks and balances from the real government and the other two branches, the Legislative and Judicial Branch?  Is that how it all works?  Holy Moley, they taught us all wrong in Jr. Civics Class in the 8th Grade, right?  There is no United States of America and no Sec of State.  It's everybody for themselves, whatever they think is best or gives them the most power, and the law be damned because that's exactly what is now going on in Washington DC, with Obama doing anything and everything he wants, and same for Hilarious Clinton, and God only knows who else in our government is just doing whatever the hell they want to do and making up phony stories to cover their own asses when they get caught breaking the law.  What law?  Whose law?  The rule of law seems to be gone.  Now it's the Rule of Men... and, apparently, women.  Unless Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama do not get away with it.  The Founding Fathers created the remedy for both situations:  Obama, when it's finally discovered that he has broken many different laws can be impeached by Congress and former Sec of State Clinton can be taken to federal court and then prison for felonious crimes she committed during her tenure.  Never mind Hilarious running for Obama's job in 2016; she will be lucky if she doesn't spend the rest of her life at Sing-Sing for placing the security of the United States at high risk.  Time for the US Congress and the Judicial Branch to develop a pair of gonads and implement the law against our nation's Top Two Laurel and Hardies:  Baloney Obama and Hilarious Clinton.

--  Sun Mar 08, 2015  Yo, Mr. President, what color is your turban?  President Obama's recent refusal to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during Netanyahu's visit to speak to a joint session of Congress last week revealed many things.  The first thing it revealed is that Obama did not want Congress or the American people to know ANYTHING about his (Obama's) ridiculous nuclear arms deal with the Mullahs of Iran.  That's right, nuclear arms.  Iran needs a nuclear power plant like they need more desert sand.  They're sitting on millions of barrels of oil.  Or, if they really are Greenies and are trying to save planet Earth from the pollution of non-replaceable fossil fuels, they can implement Tesla's free energy from the vacuum (space all around us), which is currently available today from many different sources.  There is only one reason for Iran to pursue an increase in their capability to produce nuclear grade yellowcake:  so they can do what they've been preaching for the last several decades, namely, to wipe Israel and the United States off the face of the Earth.  Holy mackerel, President Obama, you mean Iran is off and running on some type of Islamic Jihad against the rest of the world?  Yeah, you betchum.  They've said so.  Over and over and over.  But Obama either thinks he can control Iran's Mullahs because he thinks he's Jesus Christ Mohammed and Buddha reincarnated and all rolled into one, or he thinks he's the swiftest most intellectual neighborhood negotiator in the whole wide world.  Uh-huh.  Actually Obama is acting more like an Islamic Bozo acting on Iran's behalf.  Which side of the Table is he sitting on?  What is the color of Obama's turban?  The second thing that Mr. Obama's reaction to Netanyahu's speech before Congress revealed is that Obama thinks he can legally make foreign treaties without the US Congress.  Beep-beep, wrong!  Since when does the US Constitution grant the Executive Branch the authority to make secret treaties with other nations?  It doesn't.  Then again, when has that ever stopped President Obama on his dictatorial stampede to unilaterally take over all three branches of US government?  To date, he has taken over GM, taken over the US health care system, taken over the US Immigration system for his future 10 million to 20 million new Democratic voters, taken over the 2nd Amendment to deny Americans bullets for their guns and right to bear arms, taken over local, state, and national judicial systems to issue "legal" results opposite to what grand juries have already ruled, taken over the exchange of war criminals for army deserters without consulting Congress, taken over the running of guns in secretly botched up deals with Mexico and Islamic terrorists in the Middle East, pretended to have captured, shot and killed, and secretly buried at sea World Trade Center terrorist Osama bin Laden, and now he wants to grant -- yes, GRANT -- Iran the right to keep on creating more and more nuclear grade material so the biggest sponsor of Islamic terrorism in the world can take out Israel and America.  Not only does Obama's Iran deal allow them to create more fissionable material, after 10 years all restrictions on Iran are slated to be abolished which allows Iran full, unrestricted capability to do whatever they want to do vis a vis their nuclear activities.  Ten years.  Wow what a brilliant negotiator Barack Obama is.  I wouldn't send him anywhere to negotiate how to get a mouse out of a wet paper bag with ten tons of cheese.  I'm sure he would "eff" that up, too.  The third thing revealed by President Obama's "furious reaction" to Netanyahu's speech before Congress is Obama's assertion that a foreign dignitary running for office back in his own nation in two weeks somehow disqualifies him from speaking to the Congress or Parliament of another nation.  Really?  Especially concerning something so time sensitive as Bozo Brain Obama making a nuke deal with said foreign visitor's next door enemy whose "treaty" includes how to wipe Netanyahu's country off the face of the Earth in ten years or less.  Obama is simply throwing out a straw man to demolish.  Nobody in the US can vote for Israeli PM Netanyahu anyway -- except for two people living in New York who may have dual citizenships.  Wow, big voting block.  Once again, methinks President Obama doth too much protesteth regarding Israel's PM Netanyahu speaking before Congress.  What's Obama got to hide from Congress and the American people?  Why is he so nasty to PM Benjamin Netanyahu?  What color is your turban, Mr. President?

--  Sat Mar 07, 2015  President Obama and the DOJ proved they were die-hard racists yesterday as Obama and AG Eric Holder -- while admitting that the DOJ investigation, grand jury, and all investigative information related to the Ferguson case in which police officer Darren Wilson was acquitted by self defense of shooting and killing Bad Boy What'shisname -- continued to speak to audiences, mostly black, that Officer Wilson somehow got off on a technicality because Obama and Holder just know, deep in their hearts, that white racism is just running rampant all across America.  Buzz, wrong, Mr. President and AG Holder.  What the DOJ investigation just showed was that white racism IS NOT only not running rampant in America, but that it isn't even dribbling across the sidewalks anywhere in the US.  The only racism we see today is President Obama and AG Eric Holder lying through their teeth on national TV.  Mr. Obama and Eric Holder must be living in an alternate universe, like back in the 1960's, because over the last 50 years everybody with a pair of eyeballs can see that racism is over, finished, deader 'n a doornail... well, except for those who are still trying to make a business out of it, like The Right Reverend Holy Roller Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson who are still running around jacking up businesses for guilt money.  It's called extortion.  At least "guilt" for those businesses whose CEOs are stupid enough to fall for this obvious scam.  The problem with President Obama and AG Eric Holder, however, is that their actions are an attempt to dump, discredit, and ignore America's rule of law and substitute it with the rule of men.  Which men?  Why, whoever is currently in power in the Executive Branch of government.  As France has recently discovered, no nation can survive with two sets of jurisprudence: French law and Sharia Islamic law, the latter now being practiced in the No Go Zones in France.  Similarly, President Obama's continual babblings about how he thinks racism is running rampant across America is a blatant attempt to destroy America's judicial system and replace it -- as we keep pointing out -- with his social political economic view of tribalist Marxism.  This, of course, is the result of Obama's thorough brainwashing in altruistic state collectivism -- socialism, communism, fascism, Islamic tribalism -- that he learned all through his youth.  Nor does he seem capable of intellectually understanding why his premises are ridiculous, contradictory, and false.  Hence his oft-quoted phrase that his goal is to "fundamentally change America."  By "fundamental" he means he thinks you get your rights from the government, rather than the government gets its existence from inherently free individuals who consciously chose to establish not a democracy but a limited constitutional republic with a rule of law, not Divine Right of Kings, or the current President of the United States.  Obama and his administration -- hi, ya, Valerie Jarrett, how're you doing today -- think that it is their duty to dismantle our limited republic -- along with your inherent individual rights and responsibilities -- and replace it with the Rule of Men, men with the biggest guns, men with the most power.  To this goal, they purposely create crisis after crisis after crisis and then take illegal actions to "solve" -- ha ha, "solve" -- their self created crises.  Lenin, Stalin, Adolph, and Mao would be proud of Obama and Holder.  This is about as low a level of intellectual non-thinking that an individual can stoop to, and that's exactly where our current president and his administration are at.

--  Fri Mar 06, 2015  News Flash!  Bye-bye, Hillary Clinton.  As the song said, "Good night, sweetheart, well it's time to go..."  After discovering that former Sec of State Hilarious Clinton spent her entire tenure as Sec of State using her own personal email system installed at her home to perform government business, much of it obviously classified communications, the US House led by Rep Trey Gowdy is now investigating how is it that she thought her actions were legal.  Sec of State Clinton obviously had security clearances at the highest levels, same as President Obama -- and, by the way, the same as I had when I worked with SSD, ACSI, Special Security Detachment, Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, in the Pentagon and MACV HQ in Saigon, helping to prepare intelligence briefs for the President, Sec of Defense, and the Chief of Staff.  So how is it that she thought it was OK to do all of her communications work on a non-government, non-secured network?  If I had taken any type of classified documents out of our cypher-locked, leaded comm lines top secret crypto eyes only vault at the Pentagon or MACV HQ in Saigon, I would have been court-martialed faster than a New York minute.  Nor was I allowed to discuss anything about my job down at the cafeteria or anywhere else.  So how is it that Sec of State Hillbilly Clinton conducted her duties on insecure email networks?  And where does she get off claiming that she is the one who gets to decide what she thinks is classified and not classified communications that she can send in the clear?  What are we to conclude about what is going on here?  We can speculate that, since Hillary had her "secret" network installed one week before being called before the Benghazi Investigative Committee in the House, perhaps she did it knowingly in order to pick and choose, to hide, whatever Benghazi communications she wanted to cover up.  Did any of these alleged communications come from or go to the White House?  Anywhere else?  We already know that the Benghazi Embassy bombings and murders were a cover up by the Obama Administration for gun running to Al Qaeda terrorists that went awry when half the billion dollars in payment and weapons were diverted to other terrorists.  Somebody at the White House probably said, "Stand down," and if I had to guess, my guess is that some of Clinton's  communications may have talked about this information.  If this is true, and if Hilarious Clinton has deleted or in any other way covered up this information, she is facing prison time at the Big House on The Rock: dum-da-dum, Alcatraz.  I think Hillary would look good in blue and black prison dresses, and sometimes if the light is shining just right, the dress colors may change to white and gold.  At any rate, it appears that the left Liberal Progressives will soon throw her chances to run for President in 2016 under the bus down at the corner of Walk and Don't Walk.  Especially since we also just discovered that the billion dollar Clinton Foundation has been receiving millions of dollars in illegal donations from nations such as Saudi Arabia while Ho Ho Hillary was Sec of State.  Tisk, tisk, that's a conflict of interest, my dear.  And Bill, who obviously doesn't get his cookies off with Hilarious, has been seen -- and logged onto air flights -- at Orgy Island with billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffery Whomever, an entourage that includes Prince Albert of England, for hot dates with under-aged teeny boppers.  How did the Clinton Clan ever get this far in politics?  Welcome to the moral philosophical premises of the average Democrat:  total disconnected thought globs of irrational gobble-dee-gook.  And President Barack Obama is cut from the same cloth, if not worse.  Look for Hilarious Clinton, once she finally realizes that she's not getting out of this mess, to spill whatever beans she has on Nowhere Man Obama and bring him down, too.  Why should she lose out on being the first woman president and take the fall for the Islamic Trojan Horse playing golf at the White House?  Nothing like a good presidential impeachment to liven up the party, I always say.

--  Sun Mar 01, 2015  Shut up, pull up the barn floor, and listen up, girl friends.  Pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  Next week is going to be a very busy week.  The US Congress passed a budget for the Dept of Homeland Security that expires in one week.  After which, we get to see whether the House has the cajones to pass another budget that funds the necessary agencies within DHS while exempting funding for Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong's illegal Executive Order amnesty for 5 million border busters, which we all know will actually morph into an amnesty for 10 million to 20 million illegal immigrants two weeks later.  Number 2, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will show up this week to talk to the US Congress under huge protest from, once again, you guessed it:  Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong.  Why is Obama-alphabet-ding-dong protesting Netanyahu's speech before Congress?  Because Netanyahu is going to rail against Obama's Neville Chamberlain moment:  namely, Obama's absurd attempt to make a deal with Iran in which Obama -- and, therefore, America and Israel and the entire planet Earth -- will be taken to the nuclear cleaners.  Obama proposes to remove economic sanctions against Iran and give them lots more time to finish creating a nuclear bomb -- oh, excuse me, peaceful nuclear energy, sorry.  Yeah, "Islam" doesn't mean "submission," it means "Green Peace."  Uh-huh. And the Islamic terrorists -- headquartered in Teheran, Iran -- are not hell bent on destroying Israel, America, and the entire planet if necessary, in the name of an anthropomorphic, nonexistent omniscient who they fantasize is dangling 72 virgins as a reward after death for the Islamic terrorists.  The 72 virgins fairytale is worse than the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus Fairytales.  At least in the Easter Bunny Fairytale, little children get to run around and search for colorful eggs hidden by some rabbit in the grass, and Santa Claus gets to slide down chimneys to deliver presents to people.  Nothing too sinister about a moral philosophy that contains the Fat Man and the Rabbit fairytales.  But no moral philosophy should contain a fairytale about getting to screw 72 virgins and throw rocks at women if you blow up planet Earth.  C'mon.  Let's get reasonable here.  And yet, President Obama wants to play, "Let's Make a Deal," with the Mullahs in Iran, betting the entire North American continent, Israel, and all the inhabitants of the rest of the known world on his, "Yeah, man, I got a hunch the Iranians are gonna tell us the truth and let us inspect their building of peaceful nuclear power plants," said Adolph Hitler to Lord Chamberlain at the Munich Agreements in 1938 just before invading Prague and the entire Czech nation to start WW II.  Thanks Obama, you're a real genius of a neighborhood negotiator.  Reminds me of the children's TV show, Mr. Rogers in the Neighborhood.  Tra-la-la-la-la.  Hi ya, kids.  Let's play:  Be the first kid on your block to rule the world.  Back to our upcoming busy week.  Number three, the US Supreme Court is slated to hear the arguments by 26 states that are suing the Obama Administration over its illegal implementation of Obamacare.  Here's a Big Chance for Chief Justice John Roberts to make amends to the American public by doing what he failed to do the first time that Obamacare came before the Supreme Court:  VOTE NO ON OBAMACARE.  It is patently illegal at all levels of rational and constitutional analysis.  It was presented under admitted false pretenses by MIT economic village idiot Professor John Gruber, and is being implemented by whatever EO's and special favors that Obama has declared like John Luc Picard on Star Trek, "Make it so."  Then he, Obama, waves his magic wand and saunters off to play another 18 rounds of golf in Palm Springs while Americans are losing their doctors, their health care, and being beheaded in the Middle East.  In his last Big Chance, Chief Justice Roberts folded like a wet paper napkin and voted YES that Obamacare was constitutional -- after previously arguing for 4 hours that it wasn't -- and added insult to injury by injecting new imaginary paragraphs into Obamacare that said Obamacare contained "taxes" -- which were not mentioned in the 3,000 page Obamacare legislation -- not "fines" and, thus, reasoned Justice Roberts the nonexistent "taxes" clause was legal and, therefore, Obamacare was legal.  I mean, did Michelle Obama hold a gun to Chief Justice Robert's head?  Did the Obama administration threaten to kidnap Roberts' children or what?  We may never know.  But Roberts' 5-4 first decision on Obamacare was probably the most disastrous decision ever made against the US economy and inherent individual rights by a Supreme Court Justice... EVER.  The ramifications of Roberts' decision, if not rescinded, threaten to "fundamentally change" the entire constitution and economy of the United States, turning it away from individual rights and freedoms to a dictatorial fascist state, dragging all the other executive agencies such as the IRS, EPA, FCC, FDA, ATF and other alphabet soup of federal bureaucracies into Obama's version of the future American Caliphate.  Have a nice week.

-- Mon Feb 23, 2015  Ah yes, the 2015 Oscars last night!  What a joke.  The Best Movie and Best Director of the year should have overwhelmingly been American Sniper, just from the box office receipts alone.  But no, of course not, because politically Conservative director Clint Eastwood who directed a thoughtful movie about the life of an American soldier protecting his fellow combat troops in the Middle East was outvoted by the politically Democratic socialists in Hollywood.  However, the last laugh will be by Clint Eastwood all the way to the bank as his movie American Sniper grossed nearly one half of the entire box office receipts for the last year, far outstripping the individual box office receipts of every movie that the Hollywood fascists voted for.  And that tells the real story:  the majority of American theatre goers agree with Clint Eastwood and the American Sniper.  The movie Selma, a dredging up of civil rights marches and standard cliches of the 1960's integration struggle, won best song.  Whoop-tee-doo.  Hollywood touchy feely left Liberals may feel guilty for that which happened 50 years ago but most American youths were not alive then and do not see racial integration as relevant in their daily living of today.  African Americans have excelled in sports, music, acting, business, medicine and in every endeavor in America and everybody can see it.  Only the current administration in Washington and guilt-ridden Hollywood actors and actresses are playing the race card because they don't know that racism is over, finished, dead, and oh so yesterday.  Civil rights is not on young people's minds in this century.  Obamacare, economics, no jobs, illegal immigrants storming over the border, and the Middle East War are the concerns of today, not civil rights 50 years ago in Selma, Alabama.  Over all, the 2015 Oscar Night was a flop and a half.  The EMCEE was not funny and made many ridiculous statements and insinuations about everything from gay rights to showing up in nothing but his underwear, socks, and shoes -- some type of slap stick comedy that only 10 year old children might think was funny.  Nobody else with a brain did.  And everybody was supposed to hold their breath and not pee their pants in anticipation of some singer called "Lady Gaga."  Wow.  If Lady Gaga was supposed to be the highlight of the 2015 Oscar Night, we can all hang it up and not bother to tune into the 2016 Oscars, because if it's anything like the 2015 Oscars you would do better watching old re-runs of Butt Head and Beavis, which is about the intellectual level of the writers for the 2015 Oscars.  And now, the winner of the Best Idiot Running Around on Stage in His Jockey Shorts Trying to Get Laughs from 5 Year Olds... .  Ho hum, Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z.  Rating:  1/2 of a Popcorn Bag.  By the way, as an aside, the film with the most important political message was not Selma, it was the Imitation Game.  Americans should realize how important it was for the British and Allies to break the German cipher code of the Enigma Machine -- as shown in the Imitation Game -- because if they didn't, you would be speaking Nazi German today -- if you survived the Third Reich's genocide, especially blacks, Jews, and other non-Aryan looking individuals.  And we are faced with the same prospect today with the Islamic Caliphate breathing down our necks with a President and administration saying, "Islamic terrorism, what's Islamic terrorism?"   Pay attention:  history is about to repeat itself, but with possibly far more tragic results.

--  Thur Feb 19, 2015  President Barack Obama held a Conference on the subject of Islam over the last two days to try to convince America and the world that the moral philosophy in the latest version of the Islamic Koran is A-OK and that it has simply been mis-interpreted and hijacked by wierdo terrorists who are murdering people all over the world.  He also claims that Islamic terrorists have become terrorists because they need a job.  Really?  How droll.  His second claim is almost true in that the nations of Europe where there are No-Go Islamic Zones operating under Sharia Law are socialist nations in which Islamists are excluded from work because they are not brothers or sisters or aunts or uncles or buddies of the ruling socialist bureaucrats in said socialist nations and thus are living on welfare in those countries.  These Islamists have not been integrated into the work force of their host nations because there is no free market.  Thus they glom together in Islamic unemployment ghettoes of No Go Zones, shooting at any "infidels" who happen to wander into such Zones, including the local cops.  However, this simply proves a point against Obama's own political ideology of altruistic state collectivism (socialism) that he is trying to implement in America.  Socialism has no real jobs; it's just a giant welfare state.  So he is arguing against himself and his own policies regarding his stated reason for Islamists becoming terrorists: lack of jobs, which his own policies are bringing about in America today.  However, on the first point, the question remains:  does the moral philosophy of Islam contain the basic premises for terrorism against other religions and ethnicities?  That is, are the basic tenets of Islam itself to blame -- never mind the deranged or fairytale portions of Islam that the supposed "hijackers" of a so-called "peaceful" religion are claiming, such as killing "infidels," and the scoring of a hot date after death with "72 virgins" clause?"  President Obama seems to conclude (unwittingly) that Islam does contain such tenets as he compared Christianity to Islam on national TV and said that Christians should "get off their high horses" because they are just as bad as Islamists for all the nasty deeds Christians did in the Inquisition and Crusades a thousand years ago.  If he was not saying both religions were equally "bad," then why did he make the comparison in the first place and then scold all the Christians in the audience at the National Prayer Breakfast?  He wasn't simply saying Islam was good and great, but rather that  Christianity was just as bad as Islam by making the comparison.  He was -- again, unwittingly, as he is wont to do -- stating that both religions had a lousy historical record of atrocities committed against each other and against other people in general.  He even stated that the terrorism or "sin" is inherent in each religion, insinuating or concluding that that somehow makes both moral philosophies -- bad as they both are, he insinuates -- OK.  It's a lot like a six-year-old saying to his parents, "But Mom, Johnny stole some cookies at the grocery store, too," meaning, "just like I did.  So that makes it OK, right Mom?"  That's how a little child reasons, until they learn better.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  One child's bad deed is not exonerated by his friend little Johnny's same bad deed, or as President Obama was really saying at the National Prayer Breakfast, Christianity is just as bad as Islam, so "get off your high horses" all you Christians out there trying to blame Islamic terrorism on the religion of Islam, just like I (Barack Obama) just blamed Christianity for the Inquisition and the Crusades.  Duh, you can't have it both ways, Obama.  Either you is, or you ain't, that is, blaming both religions as bad and thus that makes them both OK.  Rather contradictory, of course, but what else is new with the Obama Administration?  As an aside, many Christians claim that the Crusades that occurred a thousand years ago were actually acts of self-defense and thus justified since the Islamists back then had marched all over the Mediterranean and Europe taking land, and raping and pillaging.  The Christian Crusaders, they claim, were just trying to reclaim their cookies.  Because Obama keeps going on and on about how terrorism is not inherent in the moral philosophy of Islam, let me quote William Shakespeare, "Me thinks thou dost too much protesteth," meaning that when somebody protests wayyyyy too much in the defense of an issue, there is often a grain of truth in the initial accusation.  I.e., perhaps Islam is -- at its root premises -- inherently violent, especially against other religions and ethnicities.  After all, the word Islam, according to many Muslims, does not mean "peace."  It means "submission," which is exactly what the Islamic terrorists are shouting as they slit people's throats, burn others to death, call Jews in Israel "little Satans" and everybody in America "big Satans."  I don't see how much more immorality --  philosophically speaking -- one can reveal about their religion than "submission" of one group to another and calling others "satanic."  Islam certainly does not seem to respect the concept of inherent individual rights, especially for women.  It's a lot like claiming there is "good socialism" and "bad socialism," which is what President Obama obviously thinks as he tries to implement the equivalent of national socialism in America.  Witness the national socialist health care mess called ObamaCare.  Unfortunately for Obama, "socialism," by definition, is inherently bad since it denies fundamental principles of inherent individual rights.  Rights to "receive" are not true rights, they are welfare redistributions taken from others by force.  Health care is not a right; neither is education.  It is -- or should be -- treated as an economic commodity, an exchangeable service, traded in the market like any other service or commodity while respecting the inherent individual rights of the exchangers.  Force and fraud by government is not necessary as an axiomatic primary to implement either health care or education in any nation that respects individuals' rights.  Once again, it is becoming more and more obvious that President Obama is -- wittingly or not -- some sort of Islamic Trojan Horse living in the White House and attempting to make excuses for all types of collectivism, whether it's national socialism or a global Islamic Califphate.  The former is economic and called Nazi-ism, the German term for national socialism.  The latter is moral philosophical and called an Islamic Caliphate with Sharia Law that disregards the concept of inherent individual rights.  Both are totalitarian dictatorships and that currently describes both the national and foreign policies of President Obama.  As President Obama continues to go overboard in making up more and more contradictory excuses for his obvious ideology of state/religious collectivism, i.e. his national redistributionist economic policies and religious tribalism of Sharia Law, his moral philosophy is becoming more and more obvious to everybody.  He is fooling nobody at his National Islamic Seminars and National Prayer Breakfasts as he keeps sticking his big foot deeper and deeper into his own mouth..., well, nobody except maybe the talk show hosts on MSNBC who, like Obama, continue to babble in the New Speak of disconnected, social political and economic thought globs.

--  Mon Feb 16, 2015  Left Liberals are now claiming that Albert Einstein was actually an idiot.  Why?  Because he didn't graduate from college.  Really?  I guess that means that both the General and Special Theories of Relativity are untrue.  That's right, said Howard Dean, screaming in an interview on national TV.  E does not equal mc squared.  Uh-huh.  Hallelujah!  In a related revelation, left liberal MSNBC TV talk show hosts also claim that Microsoft founder Bill Gates does not have a well-rounded education because he, too, did not finish college at Harvard.  Tisk, tisk.  Yeah, what a dummy Bill Gates is.  You bet.  And ditto for Dell Computer CEO Michael Dell, and Facebook's Zuckerman, and Apple's Steve Jobs, and American Founding Father Benjamin Franklin, etc. etc. etc. the list goes on and on.  Ya-yesssssss!  What we need are more naive, narcissistic, economic village idiots like Islamic terrorist sympathizer Barack Obama who -- rumor has it -- graduated from Harvard Law School, served as editor of the Harvard Law Review (without having edited or authored a single article for the Law Review, by the way) but even though he supposedly graduated from Harvard, doesn't know the difference between $hit and Shinola.  Oh, by the way, Gov Scott Walker of Wisconsin, claim the left Liberals, needs a Phd from Princeton in order to run for the Office of the President of the United States.  Maybe Gov Walker should study theology under Rev. Jeremiah Wright for 20 years, too, just like President Obama.  And smoke a coupla joints with bombing terrorist Bill Ayers.  That would qualify Gov Walker for President in 2016, uh-huh, you bet, just like Barack Hussein Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong.

--  Mon Feb 16, 2015  Left liberal Mayor Dinkleberry DeBlasio of New York City has formed a new public education bureau that encourages poor mistreated students to file complaints and lawsuits against rotten vicious public education teachers and principals after said students kick the crap out of the teachers and principals.  Yes, the poor have-not little snots beating up their pub ed teachers are simply misunderstood and the nasty educators must be taught a lesson.  Meanwhile, 85% of the students in The Big Apple are teaching the NY pub ed system a lesson of their own:  namely, they have bailed out of the pub ed system altogether and are enrolled in private schools.  Think about that for a second:  only 15% of the students in NYC attend public school.  85% attend private schools.  Soon, there will be no students attending the pub ed school system in NYC.  The only people showing up to work will be teachers and administrators who still think they have a job.  Maybe they can spend all day drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes in the teachers' lounge.  After 20 years, they can collect their outrageously over-priced pensions for doing absolutely nothing.  See how socialist education systems work?  In the beginning, socialists said we needed pub ed because the poor could not or would not educate or provide for the education for their own children.  So, after 50 years of total pub ed failure, the socialists have finally reached the very result they claimed they needed to solve:  namely, no education for the poor.  Funny how socialism always brings about the very condition the socialist left Liberal Progressives claim they are trying to prevent.  Maybe it's inherent in the act of altruistic state collectivism in the first place.  Ya think?

--  Mon Feb 16, 2015  Yesterday, Islamic terrorists ISIS just slit the throats of 21 Egyptians who traveled to Libya to find work to provide for their families.  Last week, Islamic terrorists burned a Jordanian pilot to death in a steel cage.  Why did they kill the Egyptians?  Because they were Coptic Christians.  That's right.  Because the Egyptians held a different moral philosophy than the Islamic terrorists.  Meanwhile, President Obama, as usual, was spending three days playing golf in Palm Springs, California.  The White House issued a press release, essentially saying, Sorry Charlie, that's life, what else is new?  "Fore," on the 18th hole, yelled Obama. 

--  Wed Feb 11, 2015  President Obama, meet Lord Chamberlain.  Lord Chamberlain, meet President Obama.  Lord Chamberlain was the Bozo Prime Minister of Great Britain just before WW II who signed an agreement in Munich with Germany's Adolph Hitler in which good ol' Adolph -- who went on to murder umpteen million Jews in concentration camps -- promised he (Adolph Hitler) would not invade Czechoslovakia or any other European nation.  Then, a coupla weeks later, Hitler launched a blitzkrieg of panzer divisions (tanks) into Prague and took over the Czech heartland.  Shortly thereafter, the Limies booted Lord Chamberlain through the goal posts of life and elected a new aggressive Prime Minister named Winston Churchill.  Churchill worked with the Americans and, as you know, the US-British-and-Other Allies kicked Hitler's Axis of Evil back to the Danube in Krautland.  So, what's all this have to do with President Obama today?  Take a quick look at what Obama is now engaged in on the international scene.  The Mullahs of Iran have promised President Obama that Iran is not creating a nuclear bomb in order to blow up Israel (who they call the Little Satans) and America (who they call the Big Satans).  No, no, no, claim the Islamic terrorists running Iran.  They just want to crank up a coupla friendly nuclear power plants to light up the light bulbs in their homes as they sit over tons and tons of barrels of oil in the Middle East.  Yeah, that's it.  Iran simply wants to create cleany greeny nuclear power plants on top of some of the largest oil deposits in the known world because they love Green Peace.  Uh-huh.  And President Obama -- repeating the history of Lord Chamberlain -- is falling for it.  Obama said yesterday that the Mullahs of Iran promised -- ho, ho, ho, promised -- that creating and using nuclear armaments is not within the moral philosophy or beliefs of the Iranian Islamic terrorists, even though Iran is recognized as the Middle East center for such Islamic terrorists.  In Obama's ridiculous Peace Treaty with Iran, he proposes to give (and already has given partial payments) to the Iranians billions of dollars in cookies and lollipops and plans to finish off the terms of the Peace Treaty with Iran several months to years later.  Which gives Iran more time to finish developing their nuclear holocaust machine.  Yeah, like the Mullahs of Iran aren't sitting around snickering in their turbans at probably the most naive and stupid president America has ever had?  A President who by all actions and measurements of the last six years -- not to mention all of his Islamic and radical Marxist formative years -- shows that he and his administration (which, by the way is fully loaded with Islamic terrorist sympathizers, some of whom were born in Iran or the Middle East) is extremely naive and about to make the same horrible mistake that Lord Chamberlain made in pre-WW II Europe?  The way I see it, President Obama is doing one of two things:  (1) he is being extremely naive about making a "peace" deal with the Iranian Islamic terrorists, or (2) he knows exactly what he is doing and is a Trojan Horse implementing exactly what he believes in his moral philosophy of purposefully attacking America, a country that he wants to "fundamentally change."  LIke what:  turn the US into an Islamic Caliphate because "the sound of the calling to prayer every evening by the Islamic whomever is the sweetest sound on Earth?"  Quote unquote paraphrase by Barack Obama.  Think about it:  would you trust the intelligence and integrity of somebody who spent 20 years in the hateful congregation church of Rev. Jeremiah Wright?  Anybody who has spent over 20 seconds in the ridiculous religious congregation of Rev. Wright who screamed at the top of his lungs, "No, no, no, not God Bless America... God Damn America," is not somebody who has America's best interests at heart.  Nor would this person be able to pass even the lowest US security clearance, just on the basis of his past actions and acquaintances.  And yet, this is the person -- President Obama -- who we now have trying to consummate a peace agreement with the clever, crafty, lying sacks of camel dung in the Middle East who have lied to the US over and over and over and broken every deal.  When do Americans stop being suckers?  The Mullahs are not playing Tiddly Winks or Marbles.  They are playing world politics for keeps with genocide for Israelis, Americans, and all "infidels" even if it means blowing up the entire planet.  And we send Howdy Doody to make a deal with those who think their salvation lies in exterminating everything on planet Earth?  Anybody from another Galaxy flying by planet Earth is probably looking down and saying, "Pass."

--  Sun Feb 08, 2015  OK, girl friends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, listen up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  It didn't take a professional shrink to figure out what's rumbling around in President Obama's brain a couple of days ago when he addressed the National Prayer Breakfast and told the audience "to get off their high horses because many horrible acts were done by Christians during the Inquisition and the Crusades."  He was, of course, comparing the mostly Christian audience to the latest actions of the ISIS Islamic terrorists who recently burned a captive Jordanian fighter pilot alive in a cage and posted the video on the Internet.  This is like saying, Oh yeah, they (ISIS) are not so bad, you Christians are just as bad as the Islamic terrorists because your forefathers a thousand years ago committed atrocities in the Inquisition and the Crusades.  Really?  There are many untruths and fallacious twists of legality in Obama's statements.  So, let's analyze what Obama was really revealing, mostly about himself.  First, he just revealed that not only is he a devout Muslim, but he is actually supportive of current Islamic terrorists.  That's why he told the audience -- mostly Christians -- to "get off their high horses."  He was implying that, by tribal association, the Christian audience was just as bad as he and the Islamic terrorists are.  He's not condemning himself.  He's condemning the audience.  Therefore he doesn't think of himself as a Christian.  He identifies with the Muslim Brotherhood.  Note that Obama presumes everybody belongs to a tribe, either social, political, economic, ethnic or religious.  He doesn't mention the concept of individuals, inherent individual rights, or private property rights.  Only tribal collectivist Hatfield vs. McCoy feudal actions.  That's why he scolded the audience; they're just as bad, he was saying, as he and the Islamic terrorists are.  Note also that Obama was saying that "children" are responsible for the sins of their fathers, or their grandfathers, or their great-grandfathers and all the way back to 700 - 1,000 years ago.  Plus you are guilty, according to Obama, if your ancestry doesn't even trace back to whoever committed atrocities during the Inquisition or Crusades 700 years ago but rather because you are a white European or American who belongs to what Obama is trying to classify as ethnic tribes, Christianity and Islam.  He is a collectivist, a state collectivist when babbling about Marxist and socialist economics; a religious collectivist when babbling about Islam and Christianity; a racist collectivist when babbling about black-white relations; and, in short, President Obama is simply arguing for tribalism, not a limited government whose sole function is to protect individual -- not tribal, individual -- rights and freedoms.  Nobody in the audience at the National Prayer Breakfast was guilty of any crimes or atrocities committed 1,000 years ago.  And at no time did Obama talk about INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, inherent individual rights.  That's because he is too busy bloviating about tribal rights, collectivist rights, as if any action taken by any member of a tribe is the fault or responsibility of every member of that tribe.  If a Chinese guy slit some European guy's throat a thousand years ago, then all Chinese are guilty, implied Obama.  So, what Obama truly revealed was that he is an ethnic tribalist -- and, in fact, an Islamic terrorist tribalist, which is why he brought up his "get off your high horses" dear audience speech because all you white religious guys out there are just like me, says Obama, since your tribal affiliation is the Christian Inquisition and Crusades while his is Islamic terrorism.  That's why Obama refuses to state what everybody else already knows:  Islamic terrorists are threatening to take over planet Earth.  His analogy unwittingly reveals his personal thoughts about himself:  namely, he is what he claimed the audience was, not a Christian terrorist but rather an Islamic terrorist.  That's why he made the comparison, and, in fact, it was less a comparison as it was a revelation about himself.  Wow.  What an unconscious thought process he just unloaded about himself coming right out of his own mouth to be televised on national TV.  If this wasn't a true confession, I don't know what is.  Many of the Christians attending the National Prayer Breakfast didn't understand the full content and meaning of what Obama said.  They were simply upset that he accused their religion of having done bad things.  Most did not pick up on the observation that Obama was making a personal comparison to himself.  Nor did they "get it" that nobody in the room was guilty of any sins of their or other people's ancestors.  The take away upshot of Obama's National Prayer Breakfast:  as suspected, this, and all the other actions taken by Obama BEFORE and AFTER the start of his presidency six years ago, is beginning to confirm that he and many members of his administration are Islamic terrorist sympathizers who are doing everything possible to destroy the US Constitution, the American Middle Class, and the concept of inherent individual rights and freedoms.  Destroy the US economy with Obamacare, open the borders to flood America with illegal immigrants, destroy the US military with the Bergdahl exchange of releasing five Islamic terrorists from Gitmo, supply the Taliban and Al Qaida with US arms and money in a "gun running" cover up at Benghazi, use the NSA to spy on Americans, use the IRS to target audits against Republicans, don't consult Congress for any legislative actions but rather just issue EOs, and the list goes on and on.  Obama's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast should be a turning point, a wake up call, to Americans and Congress that it's time to impeach President Obama for high crimes and misdemeanors against the people of the United States.  What's it going to take:  a suitcase nuke in a major American city by Islamic terrorists who have tap danced their way across our open borders because of Obama's insane amnesty program?  Do we have a Trojan Horse living in the White House?  Tune in next week as Oil Can Barry ties up the Statue of Liberty on the railroad tracks of Islamic terrorism with a Caliphate choo-choo train bearing down on her ass...  Who will come save her?  Who is John Galt?

--  Sun Feb 08, 2015  President Obama casually traipsed up to the podium last week and announced that he thinks the federal budget next year should be $4 trillion.  By the year 2020, he thinks it's OK for the US budget to be about $20 trillion.  Uh-huh.  So picture this.  Some Bozo -- that's Obama -- presumes to know all there is to know about 100 trillion different economic exchanges happening in the market every day all across the US and internationally to such an extent that he knows how much he can personally rearrange 100 trillion exchanges of commodities and services through bureaucratic redistribution of said commodities and services in the market.  In order for somebody to think they can re-arrange the trillions of future actions per hour in the US economy presumes they have perfect knowledge of what's going on at that level right now.  For President Obama to casually saunter up to the microphone and propose how much to spend next year on choo-choo trains, child care, community colleges in Hodunk, iPhones, health care, Amtrak, the US Post Office, and hula hoops is the height of economic insanity.  Nobody knows this information.  Especially President Obama who is too busy playing golf to study MIT Gruber's economic fantasy models, which, Gruber admitted, are lies anyway.  At most, they model the historical prices of aspirin and potatoes, which have no bearing on future prices of the tea in China or anywhere else for that matter.  Economics ain't physics.  And using calculus to play with fake economic models whose input was based on subjective historical decisions by consumers at that time for whatever subjective purposes has no bearing on future subjective exchange ratios.  So, President Obama, please stop pretending that socialism works and go back to sleep in the Oval Office.  If you have the knowledge to know that the US budget for next year should be $4 trillion, you should run for Special Omniscient in 2016 and why not propose a budget equal to, hmmm, how about infinity squared or however fast the Federal Reserve can print up or create in the bowls of its mainframe computers the counterfeit money you think you may need to save the world from hunger, poverty, your personal Air Force One taxi fuel costs, and purple lollipops for New York City on Wednesday nights past 10 pm?

--  Fri Jan 30, 2015  President Obama steadfastly refuses to call the global occurrence of Islamic terrorism of differently-named Muslim groups by one term:  namely, Islamic terrorism.  His purpose in doing this is manifold.  First, he is trying to pretend that the classification of objects, issues, or concepts is wrong.  This goes along with the left Liberal precept called "profiling," which they label as "bad."  True profiling, however, is not bad.  It is the basis of logical thinking and the reasoning process itself.  Classification of concepts is rational thinking.  The President and left Liberals are attempting to discourage and disparage rational thinking, the classification of concepts into logical categories, in order to convince people to NOT THINK rationally.  It is an attack against reason, an attack against the thinking process itself.  In this clever attack against rational thinking, Liberals try to substitute their disconnected thought globs method of non-thinking as the new method of how one should "reason."  Liberals using a disconnected thought globs type of non-reasoning is an attack against the rational thinking process so that Liberals can then put forth their disconnected thought process as "good."  So, in this clever manner, President Obama can claim that the global occurrence of Islamic terrorism by differently-named Muslim groups has no concepts in common and that anybody who tries to group them or classify them as one issue, a classification of related concepts, is wrong.  Second, it is becoming obvious that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, may well clandestinely fall into the very group that he is trying to disprove the existence of:  i.e. Islamic terrorism.  Think about it.  The Fort Hood shooting where the perp yelled "Alu Akbar" as he killed other service men was reclassified by Obama as "workplace violence."  The Bergdahl Army deserter exchange to release five Gitmo Islamic terrorists has been renamed "a simple end of war prisoner exchange," pretending Bergdahl did not desert, even though the US Military has already issued a judgment that he did.  Obama is holding up the release of this judgment.  The Libyan Consulate murders have been reclassified as the result of some Hollywood film maker's video ridiculing Allah instead of Islamic terrorism, terrorism which was the result of President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's gun running escapade to various Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East that went awry.  The President's insistence on amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants flooding across our southern borders, allowing Islamic terrorists to freely enter our country, has been reclassified as a touchy-feely act of humanity.  Never mind the possible suitcase nukes the Islamic terrorists could be carrying across our porous border.  The upshot is that President Obama is walking on very thin ice trying to cover up the logical reasoning process, rational thinking, and the logical classification of issues, objects, and concepts that would lead any rationally-thinking individual to conclude, and therefore take action against, Islamic terrorists.  It is becoming increasingly obvious that President Obama is acting more and more like a Trojan Horse -- whether on purpose or by stupidity -- for Islamic terrorists called Hamas, Islamic terrorists called Hezbollah, Islamic terrorists called The Taliban, Islamic terrorists called Al Qaeda, Islamic terrorists called ISIS, Islamic terrorists called Boko Haram, and the list goes on and on, choose your country in this global Islamic Caliphate.  The scientific method depends on the grouping of similar objects, issues, and concepts to reach logical conclusions.  Archimedes, Pythagoras, Galileo, Einstein and others came to conclusions based upon the grouping, the classification, the categorization of similar concepts and observations.  This is called rational, step by step thinking.  Liberals would call the scientific method "profiling" or "discrimination" and label such thinking as "bad."  So, for Liberals, rational thinking is bad.  Disconnected thought globs, according to Liberals, is good.  All detectives, Crime Scene Investigators (CSI), scientists, military tacticians and strategists, cryptologists, intelligence officers, police, judges, doctors, and elementary school children learning why 2 + 2 = 4 should be discouraged from rational thinking because it is, according to President Obama and Liberals, "profiling?"  That is Obama's goal.  And God help America if we find out that President Obama is actually a self-appointed Trojan Horse for the worldwide Caliphate being formed by all the not-so-disparate terrorists who have at least one thing in common:  namely, they are all Islamic terrorist groups committing acts of terror in the name of Islam, the definition of which is not "peace" but rather "submission" -- i.e. submission of "infidels" to self-appointed Muslim dictators.  There goes the concept of inherent individual rights and freedoms right down the drain.  If you plotted all the Islamic terrorist groups on a graph against their actions, changing only their names, you would get a straight line with the term "Islamic terrorist" being a constant in this equation.  Duh, who'd a thunk:  2 + 2 = fricking 4?

--  Fri Jan 23, 2015  According to FOX News, the Obama administration on Wednesday paid $490 million in cash assets to Iran and will have released a total of $11.9 billion to the Islamic Republic by the time nuclear talks are scheduled to end in June, according to figures provided by the State Department.

Today’s $490 million release, the third such payment of this amount since Dec. 10, was agreed to by the Obama administration under the parameters of another extension in negotiations over Tehran’s contested nuclear program that was inked in November.

Iran will receive a total of $4.9 billion in unfrozen cash assets via 10 separate payments by the United States through June 22, when talks with Iran are scheduled to end with a final agreement aimed at curbing the country’s nuclear work, according to a State Department official.

Iran received $4.2 billion in similar payments under the 2013 interim agreement with the United States and was then given another $2.8 billion by the Obama administration last year in a bid to keep Iran committed to the talks through November, when negotiators parted ways without reaching an agreement.

--  Thur Jan 22, 2015  Immediately after President Obama babbled his 2015 State of the Union socialist speech in Congress in Washington DC, he jumped onto Air Force Uno and flew to Boise, Idaho to reiterate his Marxist philosophy to a mostly student crowd of about 2,000 to 3,000 youths.  Idaho is overwhelmingly Conservative except for the voters in Boise's 16th, 17th, and 19th District.  The state legislature is about 90% Republican and many Districts do not even field a Democratic candidate because they are going to lose in the elections anyway.  Many Districts have only one Republican running in elections.  All two of Idaho's electoral votes in 2008 went to GOP McCain and in 2012 went to GOP Mitt Romney.  The big political discussion in Idaho is whether the GOP is Tea Party enough or whether the GOP candidates are RINOs.  So why would President Obama waste his political campaign time and money stopping off in Boise, Idaho to preach to a VERY limited choir of socialist students?  Because his message is videoed by the major news media and they will show his speech on national TV.  In today's age of advanced communications, it really doesn't matter where President Obama stops off to deliver his socialist campaign speeches, except that it wouldn't look good for him -- marketing-wise -- to always fly to Hawaii and lounge around on the beaches while filming his socialist speeches for national TV.  That's why he flies all over the country, stopping off in Hodunksvilles from Boise to Hoboken, to deliver his socialist clap-trap:  it looks good on TV to be talking to the masses.  Everything Obama does and says is orchestrated by his movie script writers and comes off like a well-oiled Coca-Cola ad during half time at the Super Bowl.  In Boise, he even hee-hawed around about BSU's unique blue football turf, over which the students had the collective orgasm that his marketing speech writers knew would happen.  The Blue Turf, "Yeahhh!" the crowd goes wild.  Tax The Rich, "Yeahh!" the crowd goes wild.  Free Child Care, "Yeahhh!" the crowd goes wild.  Free Community Colleges, "Yeahhh!" the crowd goes wild.  Free health care coverage.  "Yeahhh! the crowd goes wild.  "And you can keep your doctor..."  oops.  Total silence.  Welcome to 1938 in Austria.  History repeats itself.

--  Wed Jan 21, 2015  The President of No Authority.  That should have been the title of President Barack Obama's 2015 State of the Union Speech last night.  In that speech, the President said that He wants to tax the uber rich and redistribute that money to other people in the form of government handouts for "free" child care and "free" community colleges.  His reasoning:  the ultra rich billionaires do not need or would not miss the extra $50 million in increased income and capital gains and death taxes.  But wait a minute.  By what authority does the President of the United States step into the middle of voluntary transactions in the free market in which millions of individuals voluntarily exchanged $89 each to Bill Gates' company Microsoft for a copy of his Windows operating system for their computers?  Perhaps Bill Gates had already determined that if made $50 billion in profits he wanted to donate $50 million to the School of the Blind.  By what right does President Obama tell Bill Gates that the government wants to take away Gates' donation to the School of the Blind and, instead, give said money to welfare families in Detroit and Chicago for their child care and community college costs?  Are we a nation of individual rights and freedoms, free market capitalism, backed up by objective laws or are we a nation of Presidential and government dictatorship?  This issue is a question of individual rights vs. state collectivism, i.e. collectivist so-called "rights to receive based upon alleged relative NEED."  It is also a question of the definition of the term "rights."  Bill Gates and the consumers voluntarily exchanging money in a free trade agreement for his Windows product represents freedom.  President Obama taxing Bill Gates and taking part of the money exchanged by the consumers for his product and claiming government bureaucrats should determine how Bill Gates spends his "excess" profits represents state interventionism in a dictatorship.  Bill Gates has the right to spend however much of his voluntarily obtained money for the School of the Blind, for computers in classrooms, for the SPCA to help abandoned puppies, or to build a huge $20 million mansion for himself (for which he will be employing hundreds of workers to build such a mansion), or he can give all of his money to his children, some of whom may be donating half of their share to fight the Ebola virus in Africa.  Their decision, not President Obama's.  The point is, whose rights are we talking about?  Certainly not the welfare recipients receiving money stolen from Bill Gates by President Obama and redistributed to whatever cause Obama desires.  The recipients of stolen money have no right to receive anything from anybody.  They only have the same rights as the producers, the people participating in the exchange of money or other products to purchase Bill Gates' Windows product, or other products.  The real issue, as stated above, is not where President Obama thinks that Bill Gates' profits should go, but rather the issue is a rights issue in which Bill Gates, not the government, gets to determine where to spend the fruits of his time and labor.  Otherwise, why should Bill Gates or anybody else bother working?  And it begs the question: who are you working for?  This is, of course, the classic case of Socialism vs. the Free Market.  What President Obama was blathering about in his State of the Union Speech last night was simply his immoral philosophy of altruistic state collectivism -- socialism based on the false assumption that Obama, as the government dictator, has the right and authority to step into the middle of voluntary exchanges in the free market, take whatever He thinks is "excess" profits, and redistribute that according to his misguided/personal philosophy of "need."  Obama's philosophy, socialism, is whoever claims to be the most "needy," has some sort of right to initiate government force to take the fruits of others' labors and redistribute it to themselves.  We have another word for this:  it's called robbery.  In summary, President Obama's 2015 State of the Union Speech should be looked upon by the 535 members of Congress and the public in general as a dictator's speech trying to vindicate robbery.  As Ayn Rand would have said, Obama's 2015 State of the Union Speech was simply a frail attempt at trying to gain the sanction of his victims, because at his base premise he is arguing for the government to strip individuals of their inherent rights and freedoms.  Never mind the stolen commodities, it is the loss of individual rights and freedoms that you should be concerned about.  In short, Left Liberal Progressivism is simply a war against inherent individual rights of the individual.  It is a war against the underlying philosophy of the US Constitution, which includes the Bill of Rights.  It is a war against the rule of law, and an attempt to implement the rule of men, Mob Rule, better known as state collectivism whether it be socialism, fascism, or communism -- all of which always turns into a brutal dictatorship and economic ruin for everybody including -- in the long run -- those who proposed it.  President Obama is a President of No Authority and his 2015 State of the Union was simply another socialist joke.

--  Fri Jan 16, 2015  "The militant Muslim is the person who beheads the Infidel, while the moderate Muslim holds the feet of the victim." -- Marco Polo, circa 1200 AD

--  Wed Jan 14, 2015  Prediction:  France has already lost the war against Islamic terrorism.  Why?  Few people realize that socialist France is not really a nation any longer.  What constitutes a nation?  A nation has geographic boundaries.  A nation has a unique culture, even if it is comprised of immigrants.  Litigiously, a nation has founding documents, with such institutions as an executive branch, a congress or parliament, and some type of police and judicial system.  That is what broadly defines a nation.  And that is not France.  There are now about 20 million Islamic Muslims living in France today.  Five to six million Islamic Muslims live in non-integrated ghettos surrounding Paris.  These Islamic ghettos are called No-Go Zones.  Regular non-Islamic French citizens do not venture into the No-Go Zones -- hence the name -- for fear of losing their life.  Even the French cops do not enter the No-Go Zones.  No-Go Zones have their own Sharia Law, their own court system, and no French police.  In other words, France is no longer a nation as one typically defines a nation.  How can a nation exist with two different systems of law?  If a regular French citizen or tourist makes a wrong left turn and ends up in a No-Go Zone and accidentally bumps his/her car into a pedestrian, for example, does said driver fall under the legal jurisdiction of the main French government or under the legal jurisdiction of Sharia Law?  Do the Islamic Muslims have the right to stone a woman to death in the No-Go Zones of Sharia Law for, say, smooching some dude on the street, or does that non-crime under French law fall under the regular French judicial system?  See what I mean?  Who owns France?  What kind of nation is it, besides being a highly socialist welfare state?  Tactically speaking, from a battle or war position, Parisians are surrounded by the Islamo terrorists in what used to be their (the French's) own country.  Duh.  How did France get to this level of strategic military impotence?  As the Caliphate from the Middle East continues to expand, the French are in a very precarious position.  Can 25,000 or even 75,000 Paris police protect Parisians against 5 million Islamic Muslims bent on rioting and tearing down the city when the shooting begins?  I think not.  Certainly not without shooting a boatload of Islamic Muslims rioting against Parisians.  What will the French do?  We know what the French did when the Nazis marched into their nation in WW II:  they quickly gave up and welcomed the enemy with open arms.  Nazi Germany ran France for many years until they were liberated by the Americans.  Any military tactician worth his salt would say, whoa, dudes, the French are surrounded and when a huge Islamic terrorist conflict finally occurs, France the non-nation, the split nation with a huge Trojan Horse of Islamic terrorists already in the middle of the country, will fall, and in fact will become the European central headquarters for the Caliphate as they attack the rest of Europe.  If you think this can't happen, you better take a good look at many other European nations.  If you do, you will find that Britain is also not a nation.  It too, has No-Go Zones where Sharia Law exists rather than British law.  Germany has a large contingent of Islamic Muslims who also are sympathetic to the Islamic Muslims.  Other nations in Europe may not be split into two types of judicial systems, yet, but they contain millions of Islamic Muslims, too.  Denmark, Norway, Finland, Holland, Belgium and other European nations are becoming non-nations.  Never mind Indonesia.  Never mind African nations.  They're already majority Muslim.  And what else?  The United States is on its way to being a non-nation, too.  It has a President who is obviously a Muslim -- note all his actions -- and who is pretending to be a Christian.  The only thing that explains the non-cohesive un-American actions of President Obama is:  he is a Trojan Horse, an Islamic Muslim, following the moral philosophy of state collectivism (socialism) and religious collectivism (Islamic Muslim).  The moral philosophy of Church and state collectivism is what has turned France into a non-nation and if nothing happens to curb this moral philosophy, it is what will turn other nations, including the US, into a split nation, too.  A split nation is a non-nation.  Therefore, the United States, if Obama continues unabated, will cease to exist as the United States.  As Sherlock Holmes would say, when everything one has examined does not explain a result, then whatever remains must be the truth.  Obama's dismantling the Middle Class, allowing uncontrolled immigration, releasing Gitmo Islamic terrorists, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, abolishing the words "Islam," "fatwa," and others from intelligence agencies' documents, refusing to call Islamic terrorism in America -- and lately in France -- by its real name, Islamic terrorism, add this and more all up over the last six years and what does one get?  Not an accident.  Not a mistake.  Not a coincidence.  Not stupidity -- except in the long run -- on the part of Obama.  What one gets is a President whose planned, philosophical, Trojan Horse strategy is a conscious plan to turn America and the world into non-nations and end up with a World Islamic Caliphate.  Nothing else explains Obama's actions over the last six years of his Presidency.  And the French had better soon learn more about how to just hold candles, march in the street singing cumbayah, and read satirical magazines.  The Frogs are surrounded.  And all the "Je suis Charlies" living in France are probably unarmed; no 2nd Amendment in France.  Good luck Froggies!  "Ribbit!"

--  Fri Jan 09, 2015  Shut up, girl friends!  Pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, and listen up.  The crack shooters on the French SWAT team certainly tracked down and knocked off the 3-4 Islamic terrorists -- oh yoo hoo, President Obama, the Islamic terrorists screaming, "Alluhu Akbar," -- referring to Allah, an omniscient who nobody can prove exists but don't let rational logic stand in your way -- claiming that Allah is great, and is the only God, far as they know, and, basically, I want my Mommy -- yes, the Islamic terrorists who murdered 12 people in Paris yesterday including Charlie Hebdo magazine journalists, at least one Paris cop, and anybody else who got in their way, namely a few people held hostage at a Jewish delicatessen.  More deaths of innocents may soon surface.  While the French cops were like Speedy Gonzaleses to the rescue, it would have been nice if the crack SWAT team had aimed a little lower and just shot the Islamic terrorists in the legs so they would still be alive and we could QUESTION them.  I mean, crack shots, SWAT team, why not shoot low on purpose, earn that Sharpshooter Medal that you were awarded at the School de la Gendarmes and capture the cowards instead of purposely killing them?  You see, the intelligence game is like a giant 1,000 piece jigsaw puzzle:  you have 50 or 100 pieces and don't know what the picture of the jigsaw puzzle looks like.  But the Islamic terrorists know. And the key to intelligence is to capture and interrogate the perps to find out what the Big Picture is.  So while the French SWAT team should be commended for an outstanding job in BOLO and apprehension, they score a big fat zero for intelligence gathering.  Then again, maybe the French are like President Obama and Diane Feinstein in the US Senate, who released a report against CIA interrogation techniques which foils the entire rationale regarding gathering intelligence in the first place, who knows?  What would have happened if the Islamic terrorists had done the same thing at the New York Times in The Big Apple?  First, President Obama would have said, "Uh, it looks like just another case of workplace violence, nothing happening here, move right along."  New York City Mayor De Blasio would have said, "The racist NYC cops better not shoot any of the disgruntled ethnic alleged perpetrators of this friendly workplace dispute, everybody stand down while we convene a meeting to find out what the problem is... ."  Al Sharpton would have said, "I can't breathe, black lives matter, what do we want:  dead cops, when do we want them:  now.  Send your checks and money orders to my Swiss Account in Geneva."  And US Attorney General Eric Holder would have sent 200 lawyers and Acorn agents from the New Black Panther Party to New York City to check out who shot whom at the NY Times, what each of the victim's and perp's skin color was, immediately claimed "racism" and inquired whether the perps' getaway car was properly smog-checked by the EPA.  Plus did the perps buckle up their seat belts and not use cell phones while driving to and from the scene of the workplace dispute?  Important questions, like, you know, did anybody have a 32 oz Big Gulp soda pop at the scene of the crime or in the getaway car?  Without proper intelligence methods, look for more shoot-outs and bombings by Islamic terrorists -- oops, I mean disgruntled workplace non-workers trained in combat in Iraq, Iran, and Yemen -- coming soon to a major city near you in Europe and America.

--  Sun Jan 04, 2015  Lest you think America could never reach the hyper-inflation absurdities of Germany's Weimar Republic, you are witnessing this process right now as it unfolds in Washington, DC.  $18,000,000,000,000 (trillion) in debt.

Economic History Lesson 101A, Weimar Republic, Germany, 1920s  In 1914, Germany’s Fed Reserve, the Reichsbank, suspended conversion of its paper money into gold.  By November 1923, after continual “injections of liquidity,” Reich Marks in circulation soared past 92.8 quintillion Marks and skyrocketed past 496 quintillion Marks through July of 1924.  On Oct 25, 1923, the Reichsbank apologized that it had been able to only print 120 quadrillion Marks that day, but the demand was for one quintillion Marks.  Finally, after nobody would accept the Mark, the Reichsbank devalued to a new Rentenmark convertible at 1 trillion to one.  By Nov 1923, circulation had increased 245 billion times and prices 1,380 billion times.  Inflation finally stopped in one day when 4.2 Rentenmarks (4.2 trillion old Marks) exchanged for 1 Dollar, which was convertible into gold.  Germany, via the Dollar, finally went back to the gold standard, after destroying its entire economy in 9 years through hyperinflation of its non-backed paper money. – Dr. H. Hazlitt, Economist

Sound familiar?

Today, in 2015, after FDR dumped the gold standard in 1933 and Nixon cut all dollar ties to gold in 1971, our derivative markets currently exceed a half a quadrillion dollars or $680,000,000,000,000 – six hundred trillion dollars – of non-collateralized paper fueled by America’s central bank, the Federal Reserve.  And what is it that everybody is screaming for more of?  The injection of trillions and trillions of more non-collateralized paper money as “liquidity” to “spur” the “growth” of the economy.

--  Sat Jan 03, 2015  Yahoo, the new US Congress will get sworn in on Mon Jan 05, 2015.  Republicans in the US House gained an even bigger majority than it previously had and Republicans in the US Senate took over as a majority.  That means there is no excuse for the Republicans to not solve all kinds of problems, even if Bozo Obama vetoes their legislation.  They can refuse to finance any of his new crap that he has tried to foist down Americans' throats over the last six years.  And they can repeal legislation upon which Obama's illegal Executive Orders rest.  In that clever manner, the EO will be abolished.  Will the Republicans do what the electorate gave them a clear majority to do in the 2014 midterm elections or will they all turn into RINOs and go left liberal on us?  We shall see.  One of their first steps would be to abolish President Obama giving an oral State of the Union Speech on Jan 19th or 20th and simply ask for it to be delivered to Congress in writing only.  That would be a nice intro for Congress into this new term.  Slap Obama upside his state collectivist rhetoric and get on with repealing ObamaCare and all the other gobble-dee-gook socialism that Uncle Barry has tried to dump on us.  We shall see whether the Republicans are really limited government Congressmen and women or whether they are simply Democrat Jackasses in Elephant suits kissing each other's multi-million dollar earmarks.

--  Thur Jan 01, 2015  Happy New Year to everybody!  Let's see now, yesterday in the Fiesta Bowl (football) the Boise State University Broncos, rated # 20 in the BCS, whipped Arizona who was rated #10 in the BCS.  The score:  38 BSU, 30 Arizona.  BSU had it 21 to 0 in the first quarter.  Arizona was in 2nd place in the Pack 12 Conference, being the only team that beat the Oregon Ducks who were # 1 in the Pack 12 and # 2 in the nation (BCS).  So, what we got here, folks, is:  BSU beat Arizona who beat the Ducks who will beat Florida State today and then the Ducks will beat the winner of the Alabama/Ohio game in the BCS Title Bowl game.  That means Boise just won the BCS Title Bowl game in 2015 since we beat the teams that consecutively beat everybody else.  Is this a math proof or what?  What can I tell you?  That's the way it happened, moving into the Pacific Northwest.

--  Fri Dec 26, 2014  In light of the recent race-baiting by President Barack Obama, DOJ Eric Holder, New York Mayor Bill De Blasio, and the whacky Rev. Al Sharpton meeting in the Oval Office with Obama as his spokesman for "racial equality" in America, we should ask ourselves an important statistical question:  what is the definition of "racial equality?"  Are we referring to numbers of equal outcome, or equal opportunity or what?  Once defined, so we know what we're talking about, how does one calculate that number and to which companies or organizations does it apply?  Race baiter Al Sharpton and upper level politicians from President Obama down to the Mayor of NYC are babbling three falsehoods:  (1) proclaiming that all police departments and other organizations are predominantly white, and (2) that American corporations or organizations such as police departments do not reflect the percentage of blacks (13%) living in America, and (3) the result of Falsehoods # 1 and 2 are the causes of "racism."  All three are not true.  Racism in two recent police incidents -- Ferguson, MO and The Big Apple -- was shown by a grand jury NOT to be a factor.  And the NYC police department is not predominantly white.  Many members on the grand juries were black.  Al Sharpton's claim that SONY corporation -- involved because of the recent hacking of its internal communications system by the North Koreans, thus revealing that some corporate leaders may have sent racist emails internally -- does not meet Sharpton's undefined opinion of racial equality.  What that number is, he does not elaborate.  Neither does President Obama and his minions in reference to their race-baiting rhetoric.  Nobody defines their premises but they all claim to know the answers to their disconnected thought globs.  Let's assume that Sharpton and Obama and their race-baiting gang think that racial equality means that all corporations in America should be 13% black, the percentage of African Americans living in the US.  That total number would be 13% times 315 million citizens equaling 41 million blacks.  So, should 13% of SONY's employees be black, otherwise the SONY corporate leaders are "racists?"  Let's look at other US corporations.  Take the National Football League (the NFL).  It is a nonprofit 501 (c) (6) corporation with 32 teams and 53 players per team.  The NFL has 1,696 players.  But wait.  68% of the NFL players are black.  According to Al Sharpton's implied definition of "racial equality," only 13% of the NFL should be black.  That number would equal 220 black players in the NFL and 1,476 should be white.  So, is the NFL a racist corporation AGAINST white football players?  There is no evidence of that.  The drafting of NFL players from hundreds of college football teams is carried out by objective competition and bidding by all 32 NFL teams every year.  The fact that 68% of NFL players are African American does not appear to be based upon "racism" or procedures purposefully creating "racial inequality."  The free market in choosing NFL players happens to result in 68% black players, not the type of racism that Al Sharpton and our upper level politicians are insinuating exists for American corporations, police departments, and the Girl Scouts.  Let's look at another corporation.  The percentage of black players in the National Basketball Association is 78%.  Does that constitute Sharpton-Obama-Holder-De Blasio "racism," too?  Based solely on percentage statistics, only 59 NBA players should be black; 391 should be white.  Is this the result of racism in America or is it just the voluntary free market?  The big question is:  who are President Obama, DOJ Eric Holder, NYC Mayor De Blasio, and the whacky Rev. Al Sharpton to define what percentage of which ethnicity should be employed in any free market business or even the police departments of the United States?  Are blacks inherently better athletes than whites in football and basketball or are whites being held back by "racism?"  Are whites better businessmen than blacks at SONY and other corporations or are blacks being held back by "racism?"  Are we back to arguing about nature vs. nurture in genetics and biology?  Who knows?  But one thing that we do know is:  we essentially have laissez-faire, a free market, in the determination of who, no matter what ethnicity, progresses to whatever level one is capable of in America, notwithstanding the economic disadvantages that the president's own Democratic Party has created as welfare ghettoes in most of America's major cities.  Even this does not explain why a large number of blacks have escaped the welfare ghettoes to predominate in corporations such as the NFL and NBA.  The President of the United States and whacko race-baiters such as the Rev. Al Sharpton should stop falsely yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.  Overt and institutionalized ethnic discrimination by local, state, and federal government and corporations went out in the 1960's.  There is no fire and there was no "racism" in the recent police response to the perps, the thugs, who instigated attacks against the police in Ferguson and New York City.  Two New York police officers have already been killed due to false race-baiting by the President and others.  Rioting and looting have also occurred as a result.  Advice to the President, other politicians and race-baiters:  give it a rest, or take the legal responsibility for falsely yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.  Go 49ers!

--  Sun Dec 21, 2014  Two weeks ago in these very pages, we wrote how those who falsely cry "Fire!" in a crowded theatre should be held accountable for the results of their fraudulent act.  Falsely yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre is not free speech since it is a violation of the implied contract that theatre goers have between each other that nobody is going to commit this type of fraud.  It is, in fact, a crime.  Similarly, the President of the United States falsely crying "Racism!" on national TV to those cities whose ethnicities are predominantly African American and where a grand jury has already determined that racism was NOT an issue in their jury case(s), is committing the same type of fraud, the same type of crime -- if not worse -- as the person who falsely yells "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.  Others who joined in the President's false accusation of "Racism!" -- namely DOJ Eric Holder, race-baiter politician Al Sharpton, and the Mayor of New York City, De Blasio -- after grand juries already judged that race was not an issue in both cases, are guilty of inciting riots, looting, and attacks against citizens by hooligans who took the President and other officials at their word.  And so now we wake up to yesterday's murder of two New York City policemen, one Asian and one Latino, who were shot down and murdered as they sat in their police car eating lunch, by an individual from Baltimore who took President Obama, DOJ Eric Holder, Mayor De Blasio, and the Rev. Al Sharpton at their false words of "Racism!" and decided to take action based upon those false cries.  We know this from the perp's emails and communications issued on the Internet before he committed his crime.  Aren't the false words of high level political figures issued to the citizenry of a nation actionable as crimes if they incite the citizenry to perform actions based upon those false accusations?  If the President of the US showed up on national TV and said that the North Koreans had just dropped a nuclear bomb on Hoboken, New Jersey, and it was not true but people rioted while trying to leave the area or looted stores to stock up on goods, is he not to be held accountable for the results of his fraudulent speech?  This is just one in a long string of fraudulent utterances and declarations by Obama and his Administration in all areas of social political economics in America over the last six years.  Lies are lies and they should be held actionable in a court of law by those who falsely commit such fraud -- especially by very high level officials who are lying to the public.  The proper judicial procedure against the President of the United States for such fraudulent behavior is specified in the US Constitution and is called impeachment, which is removal from his office.  It is up to the US House to initiate impeachment proceedings and the US Senate to act as a court to try said impeachment.  Where is the US House today?  Where is the US Senate?  Do we have to wait for the President to blow us all to Smitherines before Congress wakes up and takes proper action to stop this type of illegal action by the highest level of our Executive Branch?  Re-read the Declaration of Independence.  Isn't it starting to sound exactly like the description of why the American colonists revolted against the monarchy of King George in the 18th century?  King George was trying to fundamentally change America, too.  What's next?  Will President Obama quarter soldiers in our houses next week?  Our little Emperor is not even issuing his dictates as Executive Orders any longer.  They are not in the Federal Register as such.  He simply issues them as "Memos" from his desk in the Oval Office.  How clever.  How crafty.  Obama just stated the other day that he will continue to do whatever he thinks he can legally get away with no matter what Congress does.  Really?  What is the US Constitution, just a set of voluntary "guidelines?"  If so, Congress is just an afterthought and can be disbanded, let's see now, how about next Tuesday?  Altogether now, let's sing along with President Obama's latest hit song, "Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for me..."

--  Thur Dec 18, 2014  Barack Obama's Big Hoax # 1001:  Open Relations With Cuba.  American citizen Alan Gross was supposedly a prisoner in Cuba for 5 years.  Was he really?  Or was he a fan of the Cuban socialist system, sitting around eating tacos on Tuesdays?  Note that in the photo of Alan Gross with his attorneys and publicist in their offices in the US, there is a picture of Cuban mass murderer Che Guevara hanging on the wall in the background.  What does that tell us?  Well, here's one guess:  Obama and the Gang worked up a deal to "free"  -- yeah, "free" ha ha -- Alan Gross in exchange for the US giving up 3 Cuban spies and both countries opening up trade with each other, even though Cuba was recently put on the US's terrorist list.  Hmm.  Socialist Obama, behind the scenes announced at midnight -- another one of his Zero Dark Thirty moments -- another cleverly concocted "issue" (granting free cookies to Cuba) in order to drag everybody, especially the news media, away from his previous "crisis" and continue his ongoing perpetual crisis after crisis after crisis style of Imperial governing of America.  All we do in this country is jump from one governmental crisis to another.  You'd think the Republicans or somebody out there in news media land would finally catch on to what Obama and His Gang are trying to do to the US:  namely, completely destroy the entire middle class and set America up for a civil (racist) war and international WW III.  If you tried to dream up a better way to wipe America off the face of the earth and "fundamentally change" its foundational documents and moral philosophy of individual rights and free market capitalism, you couldn't concoct a better method than what Dictator Barack Obama is doing.  He's doing everything possible to shred the US Constitution, especially the concept of checks and balances between the three branches of government.  Every Obama issue is new crisis and for God's sake we can't "let a good crisis go to waste," can we?  This recent Cuban fiasco crisis covers up the latest $1.1 Trillion GOP cave-in for the 2015 budget crisis of last week.  The $1.1 Trillion budget crisis of last week covers up the Diane Feinstein and Democrat's one-sided anti CIA terrorist interrogation crisis of the week before.  The CIA terrorist interrogation crisis of the week before covers up Obama's Illegal Memo -- not even an EO -- amnesty crisis for 5 million illegal immigrants from Mexico.  This unconstitutional Memo crisis granting amnesty for 5 million Illegals covers up... and it just goes on and on and on with no end in sight to Obama's continual creation of weekly "crises."  And what do the Republicans do?  Two or three out of 535 Republicans in the House and Senate cry "unconstitutional" while the majority of Republicans and Democrats tell the minority to "shut up!"  Shut up?  By all rights, the US House should be enacting impeachment proceedings against the most rogue president ever to occupy the White House in US history and the leaders of the majority political party -- the GOP -- are doing and saying nothing.  Meanwhile, the Fourth Branch of Government, the news media, gleefully reports every Obama-created crisis as if it was the most wonderful thing since sliced bread with honey and peanut butter spread on top of it.  The American people have already de facto screamed and voted in the last midterm elections for the US Congress to impeach Little Napoleon in the Oval Office but the pussies in Congress are too busy shoving billion dollar earmarks into their new Trillion Dollar budget as Xmas presents for the voters in each of their states so they can get re-elected.  If you think $1.1 Trillion is a big debt, unfunded future liabilities bring the US Total Indebtedness to over $250 Trillion -- yes, you heard that right, a quarter of a Quadrillion Dollars in unfunded DEBT.  The National Debt.  Your Debt that you didn't even vote for.  We haven't seen numbers like this since the Weimar Republic in Germany just before WW II, during which a loaf of bread rose to billions of dollars per loaf and the Weimar Republic issued Trillion Dollar Reich Notes printed up on only one side to save the cost of ink and doled out to workers' wives so they could dash to the stores with wheelbarrows loaded with money to exchange their worthless currency for tangible commodities as the currency was changing value hourly.  The entire middle class in Germany was wiped out in the 1920's and Obama and his Gang with the Federal Reserve and Congress are trying their damnedest to wipe out the middle class in American today because clever Obama thinks America is guilty of "colonialism" and must be dragged down to the gutter where his economic mind prattles along in the gutters of state collectivism, muttering 19th century Marxist sophisms like the labor theory of value, minimum wages, zero sum wealth, and redistribution of other people's wealth, the producers, based upon altruistic needs of whoever the government declares is currently -- it changes daily -- the neediest.  Who is John Galt?  Better yet, where is Ragnar Danneskjold, Atlas Shrugged's pirate for free markets?  The murderous socialist government of Cuba can go straight to hell.  Barack Obama just made a stupid deal with the Devil, disregarding all the people who the Castro Regime has robbed, raped, and murdered over the last 50 years.  Some Libertarians such as Rand Paul should not try to play theoretician by claiming that free markets defeat dictators.  America is a prime example of how that isn't true.  One-sided imaginary free markets only make dictators wealthier at the expense of the continual enslavement of the citizens because the dictators grab off all the cookies in the fake free trade agreements.  Freedom requires self-defense against those who initiated the use of force and fraud, namely the dictators.  Rand and other Tea Partiers will soon find out that the force of self defense -- such as impeachment -- will probably be necessary to stop our current American Dictator, as well as Cuba's.  Fake free trade and capitulation to bullies are not the answer.  Why are we not shocked about Obama's foreign policies?  He holds the same moral and economic philosophy as Fidel Castro.  La cage aux folles, birds of a feather flock together.

--  Tue Dec 16, 2014  Ho hum, once again for the last 50 years or more, it really doesn't matter which major political party is voted into office.  Virtually nobody in the US understands why it always ends up the same, because virtually nobody in the US understands that the nation's central bankers, not the politicians, are actually running The Big Show.  Who are the central bankers and what are they doing?  The US central bank is the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is not a government entity.  It is a private cartel that has taken over as America's national bank.  Central bankers are those bankers who have convinced nations that said nations need a national bank to fund and manage said nation.  Central bankers are private cartels of bankers who, through national legislatures, have obtained the power to print and coin a nation's medium of economic exchange, loosely called money.  The US Treasury has essentially been relegated to the role of printer for the Federal Reserve, using the Bureau of Printing and Engraving for expanding paper and fake coins when the Fed says so.  The Federal Reserve is not responsible to the US Legislature or any government agency and has never been audited.  Let me repeat:  YOUR national central bank, the Federal Reserve, has never been audited.  You do not know how much money they have actually created, or in what format, or where they are spending it.  If any business in the free market refused to be audited, they would have their corporate and other licenses pulled, their business shut down, and the corporate officers would be prosecuted and sent to jail.  The Federal Reserve has been active over the last 100 years in redefining the study of economics at all universities here and abroad.  The goal of the Federal Reserve has been to destroy the entire philosophy of individual rights and free market capitalism.  In its place, the Federal Reserve has implemented state collectivist economics departments at all US universities and makes sure that Phds in economics department teach state collectivist crap and win Nobel Prizes for their gobble-dee-goop baloney that passes for quantitative economic modeling and such.  Congressmen want to spend as much money as possible as a bribe to receive votes from their constituents and they use the private Federal Reserve cartel to provide the fake money for them, money that has no backing, no collateral.  Current economic thought by all major universities has devolved down to the level of convincing the useful idiots in politics and the American public that counterfeiting a nation's medium of economic exchange is a positive act and will make everybody healthy, wealthy, and wise.  It's called a "stimulus" and is a financial joke.  However, once the people believe this, and they have, the politicians are off and running like little lemmings leaping off the edge of a financial cliff to print up/create as much counterfeit money as possible in all sorts of ways from dumping gold and silver as the collateral for our national debt, to fractional reserve banking (printing up paper receipts for non-existent collateral, which is called counterfeiting because they're receipts for nothing), and creating mortgage and other so-called derivatives with no backing, another joke.  What does the Federal Reserve gain?  The counterfeit money that the Fed creates is "borrowed" (from nowhere since there is no collateral) in the name of the American people, who are then charged interest for this forced "borrowing" while being taxed in the future to repay this "national debt."  What a brilliant Ponzi Scheme.  Create money out of nowhere, loan it to the suckers via Congress, charge them interest, and call it a National Debt.  In fact, the Federal Reserve does not care a whit about whether Americans pay back the "National Debt" monetary principle because the central bankers want this Ponzi Scheme to go on forever as the Federal Reserve lives off the interest.  One could say that the Federal Reserve is a Perpetual Monetary Interest Generating Machine, an Interest Generator.  When they finish trashing the housing mortgage market, they move to the education market:  student loans.  When they finish sucking the blood out of the students' parents, they move over to Obama's medical market.  It never ends.  Congress passes new laws to presumably "solve" each monetary "crisis" -- blamed on Humpty Dumpty or Alice in Wonderland -- and the EXEMPTED Federal Reserve move on to their next target.  Ain's those central bankers brilliant?  The monetary principle doesn't matter.  It was just made up out of nowhere anyway.  It can be defaulted upon and new debt can be created by the private cartel of National Bankers.  This is how the Federal Reserve is fleecing the American people; the Bank of the European Union is doing the same in Europe; the Bank of Japan is doing the same in Japan; the Bank of England is doing the same in Great Britain; and ad infinitum in all nations.  The central bankers in communist nations such as Russia and China are already, by definition, private central banks pulling off the same state collectivist crap that the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Europe, the Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England are doing.  By definition, all central banks are simply illegal extensions, private cartels of bankers, of one or more state collectivist nations managing their respective economies.  Hence there is no free market.  There are only controlled markets.  Controlled by the central bankers who control their respective government.  That's why it doesn't matter which major political party "wins" a national election.  Because the central banks are busy running every nation's economy and the politicians are simply sucking up the money as national debt and dishing it out as Xmas presents to voters to maintain their political existence.  The people never see this banking activity going on behind the scenes, nor are they interested in economics.  Instead, the little suckers simply choose up sides in the fake war between each major political party, scream and yell at each other during election time, and then run off to vote for one of the two major parties in the national elections.  The Republicans are RINOs and the Democrats are DINOs (Republicans in Name Only and Democrats In Name Only).  They're all state collectivists telling you that your highest moral philosophy in life is sacrifice yourself for the "good of the collective."  You know, like Obamacare's new tax call "Shared Responsibility."  Yeah, right out of Karl Marx's Playbook:  Socialism For Dummies.  The concepts of individualism and free market capitalism are deader n' a door nail. George Bush, a Republican, is no different than Barack Obama, a Democrat socialist.  Barack Obama, a Democrat socialist, is no different than Mitt Romney, a Republican socialist (elcome to Romneycare in Taxachussetts).  Mitt Romney, a Republican socialist, is no different than Hillary Clinton, a socialist socialist.  And whoever becomes president in 2016 will be no different than any previous candidate in either major political party -- unless some Libertarian Tea Party fluke happens to stumble into the presidency by accident -- because we must all pay the private central bankers running America, Europe, Japan, England, and all the other nations in the world.  The Federal Reserve has taken one pink slip for one '57 Chevy and counterfeited it over 250 trillion times, distributing it throughout the country and telling us how rich we all are.  Billions of people are now holding a fake receipt for that same one and only '57 Chevy.  Just wait.  When they try to turn it in for the real car, of which there is only one, and which is not redeemable anyway, they will soon find out that nobody holds the pink slip for anything except a bunch of hot air from Congress and whoever is President of the United States.  That is the nature of central banking and only one President of the United States was able to abolish America's first (or 2nd) round with US central banking circa the 1860s:  Andrew Jackson.  But then, in 1914,... the Federal Reserve, like Godzilla, re-emerged from the economic swamps of 19th century Marxist sophisms.  Marxist socialism.  Keynesian economics.  Jonathan Gruber phony baloney national health care, Obamacare, modeling.  Welcome to the Federal Reserve and why it doesn't matter which major political party you vote for -- until you END THE FED.  Until the US implements true free market capitalism with real money and real free market bankers instead of the crony socialist bankers running the Federal Reserve and pulling the puppet strings of Congress and the President, the US economy will continue to rise and collapse, rise and collapse, along with all social order.  Look for an economic riot to come to a city near you... soon.

--  Sat Dec 13, 2014  OK, everybody, refresh my brain.  Did we not just conduct a 2014 midterm election in which the American people voted against Obama's illegal immigrant amnesty, against Obamacare, against the Obama Administration's handling of the economy?  So, now that the Republicans gained 9 US Senate seats to take over the US Senate, more seats in the US House, obtained 35 governorships out of 50 states, and a majority in most state legislatures, how is it that yesterday US GOP House Majority Leader, John Boehner, and US GOP Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, caved in and voted YES for an unprecedented $1.1 Trillion budget that funds EVERYTHING that the Obama Administration and the Democrats wanted?  Did we just slip into some sort of alternate universe in which the now majority GOP doesn't understand what the American voters just said?  It's only been less than a month.  What happened to all the rhetoric by the GOP leaders that they could cut Obamacare and illegal EO Amnesty by not funding those portions of the budget?  Did they lie?  Did they forget?  Or are they just RINOs, Republicans in Name Only?  What happened to the impeachment of Obama for illegally using EOs to (1) illegally legislate portions of Obamacare and (2) grant amnesty to the illegal immigration of 5 million to 20 million people running across our southern border?  If Obamacare is not repealed in 2015, if Obama's illegal use of EOs do not bring about impeachment proceedings, then one of several things could happen:  (1)  the people will simply revolt in some type of civil war against the Obama government, or (2) the Democrats will wipe out all the current gains made by the GOP in 2014 and usher in more of the same old state collectivist left Liberal crap, electing another dictator such as Hillary Clinton or worse, if that's possible.  And that is the current state of our Union:  namely, so far there is no difference between the lying Republicans and the lying Democrats.  They could both be called the Demopubs or Republicrats.  Or how about just plain old "lying rectums."

--  Sat Dec 13, 2014  Whoa, pull up the barn floor, shut up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends.  What's all this crap about the Democrats in the US Senate releasing a report -- from California Senator Diane Feinstein's little group of office girls -- bashing the CIA for torturing Middle East terrorists in order to find out what further dastardly deeds they (the terrorists) were about to pull off immediately after said terrorists killed 3,000 Americans when they blew up the World Trade Centers in The Big Apple on Sep 11, 2001?  And President Obama and VP Joe Biden had to chime in to claim that Americans must confess to the immoral values for what the CIA did:  slapping the terrorists silly for a coupla minutes, making them stand on one foot listening to old Michael Jackson tunes, sleep deprivation, and water-boarding?  Obama and Biden are correct in that the actions of the CIA represent moral values but Obama, Biden, and Feinstein have their moral accusations backwards.  It is the terrorists whose moral values are corrupt, not the CIA's moral values or the American people's values.  Let's quickly analyze what values we're talking about here, folks.  Given:  Each individual has the inherent right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and that is a moral value based upon individual rights moral philosophy.  Individuals who initiate the use of force or fraud against others automatically forfeit their same rights.  Those who are attacked are called victims and have the right of self-defense.  Those who do the attacking are called perps and have forfeited their rights.  In the crime of murder, the victims, that's the American people in this case, have the right to use any means necessary for self defense.  We are not talking about water-boarding some poor camel driver for swiping a lollipop from Seven-Eleven.  We're talking about mass murder and further terrorist acts including nuclear bombs by the terrorists.  President Obama, VP Joe Biden, Diane Feinstein and all the little propeller beanie brain Liberals in the media have it backwards: the victims, not the perpetrators of terrorist acts, have the moral right of self defense and thus have the right to kick the terrorists' butts, including water boarding, to prevent further acts of murder.  Releasing this CIA report is an attempt by the Obama Administration and others to blur the distinction between who is the victim and who is the perp, between inherent individual rights of self-defense and forfeited rights of the perp, and thus blur the moral philosophical distinction between correct values and incorrect values.  This is a shabby ploy by state collectivists, reminiscent of all the dictators in the past and currently the Obama Administration, to blame the victims and grant the moral high ground to the perps.  Obama uses this same method in his Marxist Class Warfare rhetoric between the so-called haves and have-nots, implying that the rights of the "neediest" supersede the rights of the producers.  He also uses this method in his Karl Marx Racist Warfare:  implying that individuals obtain their rights form an ethnic group instead of inherently from God or Nature, and that the rights of an ethnic group supersede the rights of the individual, even in self-defense.  In each case, the victim has been turned into the perp, and the perp has been turned into the poor victim.  Welcome to George Orwell's "1984" where war is peace, lies are the truth, and wrong is right.  Do we see a trend here?  You bet.  Individual rights vs. state collectivism.  Altruistic state collectivism at that.  In the CIA case, it's individual rights of self-defense vs. the state collectivist rights of the gang, the mob, the group we call terrorists.  Oh, the poor victims, the terrorists, claim Obama and his cronies.  If one didn't know any better, one would guess that Obama is busy rooting for the terrorists.  Our Imperial President, VP Biden, Senator Feinstein and others in the US news media do not want you to distinguish the difference between an objective right and wrong.  They want to destroy your concept of moral values by switching who is the victim and who is the perp.  Just like in the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of self-defense and ensuing race riots created by the race baiters such as Al Sharpton and Obama, just like the illegal granting of amnesty with an EO for 5-20 million illegal immigrants, and now the CIA using self-defense to obtain further terrorist info from THE PERPs who bombed the World Trade Center.  The irony in all of this is that the so-called supporters of the concept of individual rights, the Conservatives, have not caught on to this ruse by Obama, Biden, and Senator Feinstein.  This shabby tactic is called, as Ayn Rand pointed out some time ago:  "obtaining the sanction of your victims."  The victims are those who have not thought through the moral philosophy of individual rights, why victims retain rights of self-defense while perps forfeit their rights. Neither the American people or the CIA have lost their moral values and do not need to apologize for water-boarding Sheik Ali Baba to find out if he and the terrorists had any nukes or chemical or biological bombs ready to explode in the US.  They had already blown up the World Trade Centers and thus, as terrorists, HAVE NO RIGHTS.  So, President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Dingbat Senator Diane Ficklebrain can stop riding their moral cotton ponies backwards and get with the American program:  it's called objective reality and our moral philosophy is inherent individual rights and freedoms, obtained from God or Nature, not the government, not President Obama.  And that's the name of that tune, Senator Finkle-dinkle-brain, and your secret ass report from Congress.

--  Sat Dec 06, 2014  All dictatorial tyrants throughout history -- from King George to Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao-Tse-Tung, Fidel Castro, the list goes on and on -- have one particular trait in common:  they just know they're right AND they, therefore, have convinced themselves that they must take over all aspects of the government in order to implement their "good intentions" for all the masses.  Oh, thank you, thank you, for your "good intentions."  Stage front and center, in walks President Barack Obama who not only has overtly taken over the US Legislative Branch of government by issuing countless numbers of illegal Executive Orders, but who is now also overtly trying to take over the third branch of government, the Judicial Branch, by showing up on national TV -- for starters -- and countermanding the verdicts of at least two grand juries in various cities across the United States so he can start race riots.  It doesn't matter what the juries decided, innocent or guilty.  What matters is that the President of the United States -- head of the Executive Branch of government -- has no authority to usurp the US Constitution's checks and balances between our three branches of government.  President Obama does not obtain authority from either the Constitution or its founding documents, the Federalist Papers, or any other statutes, to reprimand, revoke, or try to retry the findings of 12 Americans sitting on a grand jury looking at evidence that the President has not seen but is busy trying to second guess their verdict.  The reason why the Constitution establishes jury trials by citizens rather than by King George, Adolph Hitler, Fidel Castro, Mao-Tse-Tung, Vladimir Putin or President Whomever of the United States is precisely what Obama is attempting to fundamentally change.  We had an American Revolution over this concept over 230 years ago.  Was Barack Obama out to lunch or fell asleep in his Harvard Law Class 101A on the US Constitution's Separation of Powers Lecture?  We dumped Britain's King George, who was a dictatorial tyrant, for doing exactly what President Obama now wants to reinstitute for himself as Emperor of the United States.  Look at Obama's actions.  First, he illegally uses EOs to circumvent the Legislative Branch to issue his own laws and, in the case of ObamaCare, completely rewrite entire portions of the law without Congress.  Now he uses his Oval Office to dispatch DOJ Attorney General Eric Holder to circumvent the Judicial Branch of government while he shows up on national TV to retry already-decided grand jury verdicts by yelling "Racism!" (when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary) to incite race riots until he gets his way.  President Obama is now overtly acting exactly like all historical tyrants who just know that they're right.  And if the masses refuse to obey the Emperor, then he will show them a thing or two.  Such as how he can take over both the Legislative and Judicial Branches of government, merging all three branches into his Exclusive Executive Branch.  After all, Obama knows what is best for everybody in America because he has "good intentions" and has a "pen and a phone" quote unquote... and is forming a civilian military to take over the function of the US military.  I'm surprised Obama hasn't appointed an officer in charge of emptying garbage cans in Boise, Idaho.  He's got his sticky little fingers in everything else for chrissake...  When will Obama's tyrannical temper tantrums end?  When the US Congress grows enough cajones to impeach Emperor Obama because he is not going to voluntarily stop.

--  Sat Dec 06, 2014  Did President Obama already sign an EO granting amnesty to 5 million or more illegal immigrants or not?  Sources say it has not been filed in the Federal Register or elsewhere, yet.  Yet.  Maybe the Obama Administration lost it with the 2,700 pages of IRS documents they illegally obtained from the IRS to target their political enemies, who knows?  At any rate, why is House Squeaker John Boehner refusing to issue a federal budget in which he can defund Obama's supposed new EO that grants amnesty to illegals?  It's really easy.  All Boehner has to do is write in to the budget bill how much money can be used for implementation of Obama's illegal EO while fully funding the rest of the 2015 budget.  So what if it doesn't pass the Senate and/or President Obama vetoes the budget bill?  That's on the Democrats, not the GOP as the Senate and President Obama will take the hit for shutting down the government.  This is an important constitutional issue that the people of America have just told the GOP in the 2014 midterm elections that they want taken care of:  no more abuse of power by President Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong.  On the same front, it's time for the US House to implement impeachment proceedings against President Obama for his multitudinous abuses of power, especially his latest EO to grant amnesty to millions of illegals who dashed over the border from Mexico.  As the Constitution states, and the Federalist Papers give the reasons for, the US President can be impeached at any time, the US House initiating the procedure and the US Senate trying the impeachment case.  In addition, the President and any Executive Officer is liable after an impeachment to be tried in the regular court system for any civil or criminal offenses that the President may have committed while in office.  Impeachment simply removes a guilty Officer from his public office and can terminate all pensions or other emoluments received or to be received from said office.  By the way, impeachment of any Judicial Branch officer (judges, etc.) is initiated in the same manner.  Just thought you might want to drop this trivia pursuit on some of your left Liberal Democratic Progressive weenie-brained friends at dinner next week.

--  Sat Nov 29, 2014  After President Obama was caught on video over 25 times stating why he has no authority to grant amnesty to over 5 million (or more) illegal immigrants who ran across our southern border from Mexico, one wonders why he walked onto national TV and tap danced 180 degrees stating that all of a sudden he had all the authority in the world to issue an Executive Order granting amnesty to said illegals.  Could it be that President Obama is simply issuing an EO to establish his own pathway to US citizenship?  After all, it has never been settled whether Obama is a legal citizen of the United States or not.  Is there a clause in his recent illegal EO that provides a pathway to citizenship for Kenyans?  Do Obama's two daughters qualify as "anchor babies" to allow President Obama to remain in the US because his daughters were born in America?  Do "anchor babies" qualify as establishing citizenship for illegals -- e.g. Barack Obama -- to then run for President of the United States?  Inquiring minds want to know.  One thing is for sure:  all the US Congress has to do to block Obama's latest EO on granting amnesty to illegals is to repeal the statute upon which his EO is based.  No statute, no EO.  It's just that simple.  Will Congress do it?  Probably not.

--  Fri Nov 14, 2014  Pull up the barn floor, shut up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends.  ObamaCare just got a lot more interesting.  It seems that MIT quantitative economist -- as opposed to Austrian Free Market Qualitative Economists -- has confessed at least three times on three different nationally televised videos that, as the major architect of Obama's so-called Affordable Care Act, he deliberately tricked the American public who he stated was "stupid" into voting for the ACA by purposely misrepresenting what it was and how it was going to be paid for.  Said the good professor, the American voters are so "stupid" that the way to sell the ACA was to claim that the government was going to tax the health insurance companies but -- as Gruber laughingly pointed out in his lecture -- knowing full well that the insurance companies must pass the higher costs along to the consumers.  Ha Ha.  Those dumb ass voters, he inferred.  Gruber snickered that one of his purposes was to make the ACA so incomprehensible that nobody would even know what it said because the entire exercise was to nationalize health care and move the ACA into a federal single payer program anyway.  So now we have the major ObamaCare architect -- a Keynesian economist from MIT -- confessing that he was paid by the Obama Administration to trick the "stupid" public into voting yes for ObamaCare by lying to them.  This confession shows that President Obama was complicit, along with House Leader Nancy Pelosi who stated at a previous press conference that Gruber was the main author of ObamaCare, and that he, Obama, knew full well that he was lying to the public about virtually every aspect of his national socialist health care program.  The irony of it all?  It is Professor Jonathan Gruber who is the stupid idiot, not the American public, who by the way, just voted last week in Midterm Elections against everything the Obama administration stood for.  Gruber, for one, is too stupid to know the difference between real economics and Keynesian bullshit.  He is stupid for getting a Phd in bankrupt quantitative economics, which most economists who know anything about the Austrian School of Thought, would simply call Physconomics -- the quantitative school of thought that thinks that economics follows the same laws (the methodology) as the physical sciences and thus can be mathematically modeled.  Gruber does not understand that free market economics is actually a myriad of qualitative consumer priorities that cannot be studied in the same manner as the physical and life sciences because the reasoning methodology for economics is not conducive to quantitative measurements such as E=mc2, F=ma, or any economic algebraic/calculus formula.  The best that can be said of MIT Prof Gruber's quantitative economic methodologies -- and others' like him such as Paul Krugman -- is that they are simply making up economic models based upon historical commodity prices, none of which foretell future consumer actions in a qualitative market place comprised of trillions of daily economic decisions.  So, the joke is twofold:  Prof Gruber is the "stupid" economic idiot because his plans, well-intentioned or not, could never come to fruition for the same reasons that no socialist program can succeed in the market, and two, the stupid professor just confessed to his lies in front of 315 million Americans, thus dragging President Barack Obama into this nefarious lime light.  What a dummy the good professor is.  And how stupid was presidential candidate Mitt Romney in hiring Phd economist Jonathon Gruber to pull the same lying tricks to implement RomneyCare in the state of Taxachussetts?  Caution Republican congressmen:  Jump into bed with the Democrat Progressive Socialists and you earn the title of RINO, Republican In Name Only.  Welcome to the Big Lie of ObamaCare, the Un-Affordable Care Joke.

--  Tue Nov 11, 2014  Happy Veterans Day!  On that note, let's talk about how Obama's Sec of Veterans Affairs, Robert MacDonald, is going to clean up the complete total failure of America's Veterans Hospitals across the nation.  He wants to start by firing at least a thousand employees in the bureaucratic mess we call Veterans Hospitals.  Will that work?  Absolutely not.  Why?  Because the root cause of the incompetency, the fake lists of veterans waiting for care, the lying, cheating, and general mismanagement of this huge national hospital system has nothing to do with its employees per se.  The problem is, quite simply:  socialism.  The Veterans Hospital system is a complete bureaucratic failure for the same reason that Amtrak, our nationalized train system, the US Post Office, our nationalized communications system, Public Education, our nationalize school system, and all nationalized state collectivist bureaus must always fail.  Socialist bureaus are not meant to respond to the clients, the consumers of their services.  They are established in order to respond to the government.  And the government is not a free market entity.  There is no profit and loss accounting in government agencies.  Therefore, there is no incentive for government employees to cut costs, invent new methods, or do anything whatsoever except collect their paychecks and complain that it's not enough.  The solution to the Veterans Hospital fiasco is to sell this system to free market hospitals and get the government out of the business of trying to play medical care.  Oh yoo-hoo!  Does this ring a bell?  The Veterans Hopital debacle is the same reason why we should repeal ObamaCare:  because it, too, will end up just like our Veterans Hospital system only much much worse because it covers the entire medical system of the United States.  We can no more fix our Veterans Hospital system, or Amtrak, or the US Post Office, or the US Public Education system by rearranging the deck chairs on each of their respective Titanics than we can "solve" or "fix" any socialist bureaucracy.  The government has only one function: using its collective coercive power of LIMITED force to protect each individual's inherent rights at both the national and international level.  It is not the function of government to try and participate in the free market, any more than it would be the function of football referees to actually participate in playing the game they are supposed to be refereeing.  Should the government pay for veterans' private hospital care?  Yes.  Should the government try to run Veterans Hospitals?  No.  Happy Veterans Day and don't forget to go hug a veteran today.  Or tomorrow.  And the next day.

--  Sun Nov 09  Talk Show hosts Rush Limbaugh, Dinesh D'Souza, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Judge Janine Pirro and this web site all concur that last week's shellacking of Democratic candidates in the 2014 Midterm elections is not the result of voters demanding that Republicans and Democrats in Congress come together with Dictator Obama -- cum-bi-yah -- but rather it is a demand for the US Congress to STOP and REPEAL Obama's previous and continuing socialist state collectivism that is destroying America and the Middle Class.  President Obama showed zero remorse and willingness to undo any of his past social political economic interventionism into individual rights and the free market.  Those Conservatives who are shocked by Obama's unchanging attitude still don't understand his ideology and what drives him.  Obama is a true believer of 1930's and 1940's state collectivism:  German socialism, Italian fascism, and USSR communism.  He believes in all the state collectivist claptrap of Marxist socialism and the neocolonial absurdities taught to him by his communist mother and father and other collectivist mentors.  He actually believes in already disproven economic sophisms such as wealth being a finite quantity and thus must have been stolen by the wealthy and needs to be redistributed to others, that minimum wages increase jobs when, in fact, it causes unemployment, that trade barriers make nations richer when, in fact, trade protectionism hurts citizens of both trading nations, that value resides in labor per se when, in truth, value resides in the qualitative expectation of the consumers on both sides of a trade not in labor performed, and on and on through standard Marxist baloney economics.  Acting on this ideology, President Obama will not change his dictatorial actions because he is convinced that he is absolutely correct.  He is on a religious mission -- socialism being his religion -- to right all the alleged wrongs that his teachers have taught him are the fault of America and the free market.  In this sense, Obama is not intelligent, he is not smart, he is, in fact, rather stupid because -- in spite of all the available data and results of his previous actions -- he is unable and unwilling to conclude that his Marxist ideology is incorrect.  He is unable to learn from his mistakes.  That's OK in his personal life, he has the right to be wrong as much as he wants.  But not when it affects the entire American economy and causes millions to lose their health insurance, doctors, jobs, and lives overseas in ridiculous Middle East Wars and his continuing support of the Muslim Brotherhood.  So the upshot for the GOP that just won the 2014 Elections is that they should not try to compromise with President Obama.  He is absolutely wrong in virtually every area he has intervened into.  It is the GOP's voter mandate to STOP Obama, REPEAL Obama's illegal Executive Orders, and, in fact, do everything possible to remove him from the highest office in the land which he has forfeited all rights to occupy by his previous disastrous and illegal actions.  And that is the direction that Obama is leading the US Congress:  impeachment, just around the corner.  And deservedly so.

--  Wed Nov 05  Today's Headlines:  "Americans Vote Hell No! Against Obama's Socialism."  In a landslide vote yesterday in the 2014 Midterm Elections, the Republican Party overwhelmingly expressed their disapproval of President Obama's social political economic policies, including:

1.  ObamaCare (socialist health care fiasco)
2.  The Benghazi Ambassador murders/cover up
3.  Deserter Bergdahl trade for 5 Muslim terrorists
4.  IRS targeting of GOP politicians
5.  NSA spying on all Americans' phones, etc.
6.  Veteran hospital fake lists and no care
7.  Ebola virus do-nothing, no quarantine
8.  Takeover GM, give investor money to unions
9.  No budget for the last 6 years
10. DOJ Eric Holder do-nothing against criminals
11. Allowing 10 million+ illegal immigrants
12. Losing US arms & billions of $ to Muslim BH
13. Allow Fed Reserve to create Trillions in debt
14. And the list goes on and on...

On the national scene, the US House gained 12 additional seats for a total of 242.  Demos dropped to 193.  The US Senate gained 7 GOP seats for a majority total of 53 Republicans, dumping current Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid into the garbage dump of statist history.  The Democrats have a minority of 46 Senate seats.  None of the three candidates for Louisiana's US Senate seat received 50% of the vote and thus a run-off between incumbent Mary Landrieu and her GOP opponent next Dec 6 will occur.  Projections are a GOP win with a loss by Landrieu as the Independent/GOP split vote that Landrieu ran against will mostly go to the major GOP candidate.  That means the US Senate will increase its majority status to 54 GOP.  Sen Mitch McConnell stands to become Senate Majority Leader in 2015, although there exist rumblings that Sen Ted Cruz of Texas may challenge that position.  GOP governors increased by 10 or so, giving the GOP 35 out of 50 governorships across our 50-state Union.  This loss by the left Liberal Democrats/Progressives is a clear referendum against the state collectivist policies of the Obama administration and a pro vote for individual rights, private property rights, and the middle class that President Obama is hell-bent on destroying by whatever means possible.  Now it's up to the GOP and its various constituent Tea Party and Conservative members to pull the RINOs in the GOP toward our Founding Fathers' ideology:  namely, the idea that all individuals are born with inherent individual rights and thus must take responsibility for exercising those rights.  Step One:  time to undo all the harmful and intrusive governmental statism that the Obama Administration has tried to shove down our throats over the last six years.  Time for Obama to step down and relegate his legacy to the garbage dump of failed state collectivism.

--  Sun Oct 26, 2014  What a coinkydink!  President Obama's White House last Friday interrupted US Congress's committee meeting on the US Ebola crisis to show a photo op of Obama hugging miraculously-cured nurse Nina Pham in the Oval Office of the White House.  Just last week all the major TV networks interviewed Ms. Pham was laying in a hospital bed, quarantined -- supposedly -- with the deadly, lethal, watch-out-now Ebola virus.  Suddenly, Ms. Pham jumped up out of bed, totally cured, and was whisked away to the White House where she schmoochie schmooched in a photo op with Obama-rama-lama-ding-dong.  Wow.  Tell me this was not staged by the Hollywood script writers, just before the 2014 midterm elections.  News Flash!!  Obama saves world from Ebola epidemic.  Vote for the Democrats!  Yahoo and Hallelujah!

--  Sat Oct 25, 2014  Did I wake up this morning on Planet Mars?  Something stinks in Denmark.  And in the US.  The big news item of the day shows President Barack Obama hugging Ebola virus victim nurse Nina Pham in the Oval Office of the White House.  The news article goes on to claim that nurse Pham -- who was in quarantine last week -- miraculously got rid of ALL traces of the Ebola virus and is now just hunky dory AOK.  All this in about a week after being transferred to Emery (?) Hospital and supposedly receiving a blood transfusion from one of the also "cured" doctors who came back from West Africa after being infected by the Ebola virus and given a new untested anti-Ebola vaccine.  Second Ebola-infected nurse who worked with now dead from Ebola virus, a patient named Mr. Duncan, has also allegedly overcome this "lethal" virus and also reports no trace of the Ebola virus in her body, too.  Wow, what miraculous recoveries from what the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the majority of doctors world-wide have claimed is (or was) a lethal virus with no cure -- except within the last two weeks apparently, just in time for a front page photo op with President Barack Obama.  Whoop-tee-doo, if you believe in coincidences and miracles.  And now, Canadian health organizations claim they have had vaccinations for Ebola since forever and sent a million shots to the World Health Organization for West Africa but it seems like nobody received these wonderful cures since some 5,000 West Africans have recently died from Ebola.  What did the doctors -- both American and others in West Africa -- do with these vials, drink them down at breakfast with their orange juice or flush them down the toilet?  Oh that's right.  There are no toilets in Third World West Africa.  Why didn't anybody give these wonderful antibodies to poor Mr. Duncan who lied his way into the United States from Liberia, only to drop dead from his Ebola virus at Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas, Texas?  Why am I suspicious that maybe the two nurses didn't really have Ebola and were simply sent to the hospital where -- in record time, less than the 21 days of standard quarantine -- they miraculously recovered just in time for a photo op with Dictator President Barack Obama one week before the 2014 midterm Elections?  How convenient.  Front page news.  And now, US pharmaceutical companies are all claiming they can ship "the Ebola cure" to everybody in the country by early 2015.  Holy moly!  Sounds like two movies:  "V is for Vendetta" and "Wag The Dog."   Meanwhile Governors Christie of New Jersey and Dinkleberry of New York have just issued travel bans and quarantines for their respective states because another doctor from West Africa showed up to New York infected with Ebola.  He rode on the airlines, jumped in a taxi, ate at some restaurant, went bowling, and then notified the authorities that he sort of quarantined himself by taking his own temperature (103 deg F) each day for a week.  Really?  What a busy quarantine that was.  Hasn't this newly infected doctor and the governors of New Jersey and New York heard the great news?  There is no possibility of an Ebola outbreak in the US because all ya gotta do is get a blood transfusion from one of the initial doctors returning from West Africa -- like the two nurses hugging Obama in the Oval Office of the White House did -- and you will miraculously be cured in less than a week, yippee, yahoo, and lah-dee-dah.  Somebody somewhere in the medical community, the CDC, the WHO, President Obama, and whoever else are either lying through their teeth or we are totally mis-communicating our knowledge about the Ebola virus all over the Internet, major TV news media, and through the Obama Administration's White House.  Wow!  Are we living back in the lies and propaganda of the USSR or on planet Mars or where?  Good thing we're implementing a National Socialist Health Care system:  ObamaCare.  I suppose you can keep your Ebola virus if you want to, along with your doctor who apparently doesn't know crap about what's happening with Ebola, much less your diabetes Type II.

--  Fri Oct 17, 2014  Welcome to Hidden Springs, Idaho, the HOA from hell!  No, it's not all of the Hidden Springs Town Association (HSTA) members in the HOA that are from hell.  It's the current and many past Hidden Springs Town Council members who fall into the category from Hades.  So whatsa hoppenink at Hidden Springs, 3-4 miles outside of Boise?  Seems like the Town Manager -- employed some 5-6 years through the HOA management group AMI -- has been charged with, and is currently being investigated for, allegedly pilfering HSTA funds from the Home Owners Association.  Imagine that.  This is according to information released by the HS Town Council at a meeting held last Wednesday.  Having served as one of five Town Council members for this very same HOA from hell for a full year in 2011 -- after which we moved -- I know all the players, past and present, and did my best to implement HOA Best Practices for the HSTA, such as obtaining annual financial audits (they had never had an audit), obtain fidelity insurance in case of embezzlement or theft (we had several million in HOA funds), obtain spare parts and pumps for the HSTA's self-owned sewer plant, and various other Best Practices.  Unfortunately, I was met with total resistance from the other four Town Council members I served with and even had to walk to 850 homes with a petition to prevent the Board from investing over $350,000 of HOA funds into the stock market, which would have risked principal and interest.  My wife and I, and a few friends, stopped the other HS Town Council members from this imprudent crap shoot but not without a lot of argument and infighting.  The other four 2011 town council members continually voted "no" for a full annual audit and "no" to purchasing fidelity insurance against embezzlement and theft. There were numerous other issues that I do not have time to go into, but suffice it to say that various Town Council members were currently, or historically, engaging in conflict of interest activities and/or unethical acts.  While I had many suspicions that certain individuals from the Town Manager to Town Council members may have engaged in illegal financial activities, I had no real proof, and thus could only call for a forensic audit which, again, all the other 2011 TC members as well as 2012, 2013, and 2014 TC members turned down.  Fast forward to today, October 2014.  Lo and behold, the Hidden Springs town council just called an emergency meeting to tell the HSTA membership that their town manager of 5-6 years has been fired and felony charges of theft or embezzlement have been instigated with the Boise, Idaho police department.  I will be opening a bottle of champagne with those who tried to help me implement Best Practices at Hidden Springs, even though we failed in some areas but succeeded in others.  However, the real failure falls not on the alleged theft of HOA funds by a "trusted" town manager, but rather on all the town council members I served with in 2011 and many previous town council members who continually said "no" to implementing Best Practices, such as annual audits.  Even today, after the discovery of theft by the Town Manager, if you log onto the Hidden Springs Facebook page, current and former town council members are busy claiming that nothing has gone wrong, everything is A-OK, and that they still don't need a full forensic audit.  Really?  That's like trying to convince robbery victims that they really haven't been robbed, move along, everything's OK, nothing happening here.  Either they still don't get it, or, is something else going on?  Who knows?  The take home message here is:  if you belong to an HOA from hell, the best thing you can do is to attend a legal HOA seminar from a respectable HOA law firm at which they can tell you how to run an HOA with Best Practices.  As for those Hidden Springs current and former town council members who are busy trying to cover their asses and snow the entire HSTA membership by writing on the Hidden Springs Facebook, the equivalent of "Nothing happening here, move right along," methinks they do protesteth too much.  What are they trying to cover up?  Follow the money.  That's why it is always prudent to implement an annual audit for your HOA... especially if your HOA has never had an audit, not just a flimsy accounting review that former Hidden Springs town council members said they did in 2012, what a joke, but also your HOA should purchase fidelity insurance.  Remember:  liability insurance for your HOA does not cover embezzlement or theft.  Only fidelity insurance covers theft, including currently unknown historical theft that may be discovered after the fact.  All I can say is:  Good luck to those of my friends still living in Hidden Springs, the HOA from hell.  Who knows what this current investigation will uncover.  I'm just glad my wife and I sold our house in Hidden Springs and moved to a better place.

--  Tue Oct 14, 2014  According to Col. Allen West, "The US Constitution, Article I, Section VIII, Clause number four, says that only Congress has the ability to make rules or laws regarding naturalization; President Obama does not have that authority.  So, when you go back and look at the executive order issued by Obama, calling it a DREAM Act, you look at this edict that he has sent down, it is an unlawful order.”  Since the DREAM Act is unlawful, nobody has to obey it.

--  Wed Oct 08, 2014  According to a blurb on Facebook, "Their numbers grow in every Western country, with Muslim births far outnumbering those of the western nations, and Mohammad being the most popular baby name in London. The Muslim population in some London hamlets is higher than 40%. Marseille, France 35%, Amsterdam, Netherlands 25%. And in Dearborn, Michigan USA almost half the population is Muslim according to the census.  Their goal is not to live side by side with the West but to convert the host nations by any means necessary. It’s often called ‘creeping’ Sharia. Our elected officials and our courts have failed to address Sharia in America. Bans on Sharia in the U.S. have been challenged and are stalled in the courts. Political correctness shuts down any debate over the dangers of Sharia in the West."  Should we be worried?  You decide.

--  Sun Oct 05, 2014  Should the US dash back into the Middle East and continue fighting the Islamo fascists?  Is this the same as the US having dashed into Vietnam to fight the Commies?  Are the underlying premises, self defense, appropriate as reasons for entering either the Vietnam war or the Middle East war?  In Vietnam, a coalition of socialist/communist nations -- North Vietnam, the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR), and Communist China -- attached the rice farmers of South Vietnam.  The US came to the rice farmers' rescue, which was morally correct, self defense, but the US did a horrible political job of implementing that war and eventually lost.  In Vietnam, the military was called "advisors."  The US military was not allowed to fight the Vietnam war either strategically or tactically; US politicians ran and bungled the Vietnam War.  We supposed "partnered" with the South Vietnamese, trained their army, but the South Vietnamese threw down their weapons and ran at the first sight of their enemies.  Why?  Because they were just simple rice farmers who had no clue what the war was all about -- an invasion by North Vietnam and their communist allies.  The South Vietnamese joined their army for the money.  Period.  Now, here we are again, about 40 years later, and the US is discussing whether we should "partner" with various factions in the Middle East to fight against the Islamo fascists called ISIL.  The Islamo fascists are not doing anything different than the North Vietnamese and their allies did in Vietnam.  Both invading groups initiated the use of force, torture, murder, rape, beheadings, etc. and both groups are essentially a variation on the theme of state or church collectivists.  Socialists, communists, and Islamic Jihadists are all the same, pushing a dog-eat-dog central government -- Communism or a Caliphate -- with the rottenest dogs on top running the show.  In both cases all individuals -- in Vietnam and in the Middle East -- lose their inherent rights, especially women, and there is no such thing as a free market.  While it is true that the US Federal Reserve had an initiating role in the Middle East by creating the Petrol Dollar with OPEC and using the US military to enforce its deal, the Obama Administration has totally bungled the Middle East mess that was created by former Presidents George Bush.  This is not to say that the Islamo fascists were not already on the war path against individuals and the concepts of individual rights and free markets.  But Obama has essentially given the ISIL fascists all their military weapons and directly or indirectly provided financing for the Islamos to conduct their war.  The question remains:  while it can be argued that it is morally correct to help the individuals in the Middle East against the invasion of a bunch of Islamos fascists, as well as ensuring said Islamos do not jump to the US, just as it was morally correct for the US and its allies to come to the aid of the South Vietnamese, if we use the same political methodology in the Middle East as we did in Vietnam -- partnering with the natives -- we will lose the war.  Why?  For the same reason we could not "partner" with the South Vietnamese:  like the rice farmers in South Vietnam, the camel drivers in the Middle East have no clue about the global ramification of what's going on and they are only joining the army to receive the US dollar to feed their families.  They, too, will throw down their American weapons as soon as they see ISIL coming over the hill.  So, it appears that the US must either turn into Roman soldiers and conquer the Middle East with a million troops on the ground until we help them establish a real Constitution and Bill of Rights, or we just pull out, protect our own borders, and say, "Adios, good luck!"  But the absolute worse thing we can do is exactly what President Obama is doing today, kinda, sorta nothing, no objective, no strategy, and socially-politically-economically stupid acts of dropping a couple of bombs a day somewhere on somebody or an empty cardboard building.  That's what happens when (1) a neighborhood organizer (Barack Obama) instead of an experienced military strategist tries to conduct a foreign war, and (2) our President appears to lean so far toward what he thinks are "peaceful Islamists" that his obvious turban is falling off his head.  Obama the Pied Piper is looking and acting more and more like a Trojan Horse from Syria than anything else.

--  Thur Oct 02, 2014  As mentioned previously in these pages, those of you who love to have your pets lick your lips as an anthropomorphic "kiss," feed them from your dinner plates or hands and then not wash up, sleep with them in your bed, and generally allow your pets to run all over your house as if they were your human children, should jump on the Web and Goggle the Center for Disease Control (CDC) with a basic bacteriological/immunological question:  can viruses such as Ebola, polio, SARS, ENT D 68, and bacteria such as salmonella jump species?  That is, can viruses and bacteria jump from animals to humans?  And the answer is -- wait for it, animal lovers, wait for it -- YES.  Especially at risk are small children from ages 0 to five years old, older individuals, and sick individuals whose immune systems are already maxed out.  Should you break out the Lysol and slug down a bottle of Listerine?  No, but pretending that pets are humans and should be treated as humans is a form of anthropomorphism, attributing human attributes to non-human pets or even objects.  The old wives' tale that one should purposely expose oneself to lots of viruses and bacteria because that will build up one's immune system is balderdash.  The germ of truth that children can become immune by allowing them to come into contact with other children with the measles, etc., does not extrapolate to the general idea that it is good to expose your children to all sorts of viruses and bacteria and live in unhygienic environments.  If exposing people to bacti and viruses was wonderful, then we should allow pets to run all over the kitchens of restaurants and hospital operating rooms where they can lick everybody's dinner plates and the wounds and incisions of patients undergoing surgery.  Wow, everybody would build up really great immune systems, right?  Buzz, wrong!  Americans today have become "pet happy" and have ignored basic hygiene concepts of keeping their pets outside (warmed dog houses during the winter), not allowing pets in kitchens, dining rooms, bathrooms, and bedrooms and not "kissing" dogs and cats or sleeping with them.  Pets are great companions and we all lover them but they are not humans and carry many diseases that can jump to humans.  It took hundreds of years after its initial discovery by Pasteur, Lister, and others for humans to accept the fact that bacteria and viruses are little critters that can be transmitted from person to person and animal to person and insect to person and now, today, as the Ebola virus that has become an epidemic in North Africa and carried by humans across the Atlantic to the United States, can be transmitted in more ways than one:  be aware; Ebola virus, for which there is no known cure, can jump species from pets to humans as well as from humans to humans.  Woof, woof, and meow to those who refuse to get it and/or have yet to find out the hard way.  Hope you never do, but a word to the wise is sufficient.

--  Thur Oct 02, 2014  And another Obama Administration top official, little Suzie Housefwife, head of the US Secret Service, bit the dust yesterday as she resigned under pressure from the US Congress.  What for?  Seems like she was busy collecting a big government paycheck for not doing her job.  Several cases of individuals jumping over the White House fence on Pennsylvania Avenue -- right next to Marvin Gardens and B & O Railroad -- and traipsing all over the White House before being apprehended led Congress to call for the head of the Secret Service.  Her tap dance before Congress was a joke as she simply folded under questioning and had no good answers about the security breaches that occurred under her watch.  What a surprise.  This is just another indication of how big government becomes so big and becomes so "politically correct" that it no longer can even function.  The US Post Office, Amtrak, the Secret Service, the IRS, the EPA, the NSA, Eric Holder's DOJ, our Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama with no military experience, bankrupt/lying VA hospitals with fake lists, ObamaCare national socialist health, and on and on it goes.  Big Government that Democrats think is necessary to save and protect everybody has morphed into the exact opposite:  total bureaucratic incompetence that hurts everybody.  That's what happens when free market activities are taken over by a central fascist state pretending that the government can function as efficiently as the free market.  Not to mention the loss of every individual's inherent rights and freedoms.

--  Mon  Sep 29, 2014  Why is Eric Holder, America's top cop at the Dept of Justice, resigning after 6 years with President Barack Obama?  Easy peasy, lemon squeazy.  Holder is on the verge of getting caught for all of his dirty deeds -- make that non-deeds of doing nothing -- in a dozen big time scandals.  Refusing to go after the IRS when it is clear beyond a shadow of a doubt that the IRS has been used by the the Obama Administration to target opposing political groups for tax exempt status, "fast and furious" gun running by the US to the Mexican drug cartels on the premise, which backfired, that the US could then trace the cartels by tracing the guns.  Unfortunately, the drug cartels are not as stupid as Obama and Holder and they simply filed off the serial numbers of the free weapons they received from Holder and then murdered US border agents.  What did Holder do about the murdered American ambassador in Benghazi in which then Sec of State Hillarious Clinton and Dictator Obama thought they could run guns in Libya and then when that failed tried to buy them back, which also failed, and is why the US Ambassador was killed?  Holder did nothing.  And it goes on and on with Obama and Holder playing the race card at every opportunity, especially when they ran up against one of their criminal brick walls and had nowhere else to go.  So it is no big surprise that after DOJ US Attorney Eric Holder was sanctioned by the US Congress, he had to jump ship and try to get out of being prosecuted for all his lies of commission and omission.  His favorite response to committees in Congress was, "Uh, I don't really know...  Yeah, uh-huh, I don't remember... Hmm, let me think, no, I don't really know the answer to that question, I'll have to look it up after I eat my Cheerios and wipe my derriere, whatever."  Meanwhile, President Obama simply shakes Holder's hand, smirks a sly grin, and says, "We'll miss you."  You bet he will.  Now Obama's next trick is how to pick an Eric Holder clone for the DOJ top cop position and convince the Senate to OK it.  No problem.  Everybody on the Hill is making a deal just to stay in power in Washington DC.  Oh, and about the Middle East war that Obama supposedly ended and, well oops, is now re-starting up to fight ISIL, ISIS, the Taliban, Hamas, Al Qaeda -- hey I can't keep up with all the different camel tribe names in the Middle East desert?  Tune in next month for how Obama gets around putting American "boots on the ground" by issuing all troopers Air Nikes that somehow float 2 inches off the ground.  Yeah, just change the words so the deeds can follow.  Our F-16s have been redefined as "flying magic carpets."  Bombs are now "popcorn."

--  Sun Sep 21, 2014  So Scotland voted "no" to secede from the United Kingdom last week.  Why in hell would they want to secede?  Some lame answers that rolled in over the national news is that many Scots wanted more socialism, more welfare money from their national governments and from Big Brother England.  Really?  Are the Scots reallly that stupid?  Haven't they heard the news:  Marxism died last century.  Capitalism has far outstripped anything socialism and communism could produce in any economy.  If you aren't able to intellectually understand why all the Marxist economic sophisms were ridiculous and would fail, then you should be able to turn on the TV news and synthesize the empirical data from the last 200 years proving that socialism, fascism, and communism -- all various forms of dictatorial state collectivism -- have failed, and failed miserably with all kinds of accompanying Holocausts in which millions of people were murdered by the omnipotent state. So why would a Western Civilization like Scotland try to vote in more socialism?  Maybe because they don't understand that one can't get much more socialist than Britain already is, nor can they figure out that it IS the socialism in Britain -- certainly not free market capitalism -- that has brought both Scotland and Not So Great Britain to the brink of social political and economic bankruptcy.  Dying of cyanide, the Scots were asking for more.  Anybody who thinks Britain -- or any other European nation, including Switzerland -- is a free market needs their head examined.  Hell, the US is not even truly a free market.  The most that one can claim about America's market is that, technically, it is a fascist dictatorship with so many government regulations that the Middle Class is essentially being wiped out.  In fact, at our current rate of decline, the US will soon pass up European socialism, and degenerate into nothing but Washington Rules and Welfare Recipients.  Instead of voting to secede from the UK, perhaps young Scots should be thinking about how the UK should secede from state collectivism.  Of course, that would entail something like thinking, or reading Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.

--  Sun Sep 21, 2014  So where is the United States on the ISIS crisis in the Middle East?  Without declaring an act of war, the US Congress has voted to give our 1960's radical dictator, President Obama, several hundred million dollars or more in funding to send US military troops to the Middle East as "advisors," -- shades of a Vietnam instant replay.  Obama's war cry of "no boots on the ground," -- which means that US troops will be wearing, what, Air Nike tennis shoes? -- is a joke.  If you are going to fight a war, then fight a war to win, not for publicity stunts and photo ops.  This is exactly what happened in Vietnam:  America was morally correct to help the South Vietnamese in their defense against a coalition of the Communist North Vietnamese, the USSR, and Communist China but American politicians nailed the US military's boots to the floor and did not allow them to fight a real military war, which would have ended in about 48 hours with very few casualties.  Instead, we "partnered" -- ha ha "partnered" -- with the South Vietnamese farmers qua pretend-military soldiers -- and lost our butts.  Don't shoot unless you are fired upon, now let's go do "search and destroy," etc. etc. and 500,000 US troops were simply emasculated into sitting ducks while the Soviets and Chi Coms rampaged through the South Vietnamese countryside committing the same types of atrocities that ISIS is now committing in the MIddle East.  A modern US Army does not "partner" with rice farmers and camel drivers and expect them to accomplish much of anything militarily.  Think about it:  rice farmers and camel drivers earn like five bucks a year and if you offer them a hundred bucks a month they will pretend to do anything you want just to keep their families alive.  This is exactly what happened when the US exited Iraq stage left, as in left Liberal, and ISIS ran down through Iraq.  The "partnered" camel driver army of Iraq threw down their American weapons faster than a New York Minute and ran for what few hills there were.  "Partnering" doesn't work.  Foreign aid only enriches the current leaders, with much of the funding ending up in ISIS's hands to further finance the war against the US "infidels."  So, the upshot about how Dictator Obama is going to pretend that he is fighting a war in the Middle East is a military joke, both strategically and tactically.  The US has a moral right to help the poor camel drivers and others whose inherent individual rights are being stomped on in the Middle East -- especially women -- but Obama is not a military man, not even a very intelligent neighborhood organizer, and should not be our automatic Commander-in-Chief.  One last note:  it is becoming rather obvious that either Obama is gung-ho PRO the ISIS Muslim Brotherhood because he sympathizes with what he erroneously thinks is their previous neo-colonization by western nations, or else he is even more stupid than we previously thought.  Conclusion:  if one is going to fight a war, one must commit to fighting it correctly.  That is, with a minimum of loss of life and with a clear objective of what one is doing and how one should accomplish those objectives.  It is morally correct to come to the aid of an old lady being attacked on the streets by hoods using guns, but not by showing up with a butter knife and partnering with Estonia for $2 billion.  Nor should one show up with RPGs, Harrier jets, and a zillion rounds of ammo for the "partners" to give away to the ISIS hoods.  No boots on the ground?  Hey, lets' break out our Air Nikes and tiptoe around the desert, pretending we're going to stop a Caliphate.  Meanwhile, who's coming across our southern borders with nuke suitcase bombs and such?  I wonder.

--  Fri Sep 12, 2014  Part III of Ayn Rand's movie Atlas Shrugged, Who is John Galt? comes out today.  Go see it and find out how today's economy ends and a renaissance begins.  By the way, where is Ragnar Daneskjold?

--  Sun Sep 07, 2014  Whoa, Idahonians, wanna know why public education costs so much in Idaho?  Pull up the barn floor, pour yourself another hot cup of Rocket Java and listen up, girl friends.  Outgoing Supt of Idaho Schools, Tom Luna, gave two top staffers raises amounting to about 50% and 37% respectively.  The salary for Deputy Chief of Staff, Jason Hancock, was bumped from $88,000 per year to $130,000 per year and Communications Director, Melissa McGrath's salary was boosted from $72,000 per year to $98,000 per year.  Why?  Luna only said, "because they took on extra work."  Most of the other 140 employees on Luna's staff received a 1% salary and 1% bonus increase this year.  Compare this to private businesses:  Nobody in a commensurate salary job would receive a 50% or 37% pay raise unless they invented the wheel or discovered how to time travel.  Idaho's Public Education system is riddled with these types of cronyisms and ridiculous expenditures.  The Pub Ed annual budget is about $2.0 billion per year out of Idaho's $3 billion budget.  Adding in federal grants and other cookies from the fed for Leave No Child Behind, Race To The Top, and now Common Core, bring Idaho's annual budget to around $3 billion per year.  When running for Dist 18's Senate seat in 2004 I downloaded the entire Idaho State School Budget and discovered hundreds of redundant line items for busing, landscaping, special programs, Vice Principles not per high school but per each of 3-4 grades per high school, and on and on.  Many Idaho school district's cost per pupil for K-12 education totaled -- wait for it -- totaled more than the then $35,000 per year cost to attend Harvard University.  Elementary schools with 50 or less kids had to duplicate everything that schools with hundreds of children had, from playgrounds to buses to cafeterias to gymnasium and so on.  If Idaho was really a Conservative state, Gov Otter and School Supt Tom Luna would have worked to dump public schools and moved education to privately owned schools.  Otherwise, these above mentioned pay raises for friends of friends, buddies of buddies, will continue until they finally bankrupt Idaho's Pub Ed System.  Meanwhile, the kids are coming out dumber and dumber and do not even learn HOW to think much less what to think.

--  Fri Sep 05, 2014  Dinesh D'Souza's latest book: America, Where Would the World be Without Her is a must read for anybody who is trying to keep up with current social political economics.  He explains why President Obama and the current crop of progressives are not stupid but are actually very clever at what they are doing, which is purposefully trying to downsize the United States for what they consider is just dues for America's alleged past colonialism.  The progressives are, of course, wrong and D'Souza points out how in his very thought-provoking book plus a movie of the same title.  Think of D'Souza's book as Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Lite, not on intellectualism but on the style of writing.  Both books are great reads and both movies are, too.

--  Fri Sep 05, 2014  Next Friday on Sep 12 Ayn Rand's Part III, the conclusion, to her trilogy film Atlas Shrugged will be playing at all major theatres.  I suggest you re-see Parts I and II so you can slide right into Part III with your buttery bag of popcorn.  Popcorn once a month or so is OK, for all you philosopher body builders out there trying to keep up with Ragnar Daneskjold, the pirate in Atlas Shrugged who keeps all government busy by blowing up or swiping all of their stolen cargo on the high seas and getting away in his super fast Ragnar-mo-ship traveling at the speed of sound.  Remember where we left off in Part II?  Dagny had just tried to follow a Jr scientist who figured out how to make John Galt's energy machine work but crashed her plane at Galt's Gulch.  Many scientists, businessmen, and musicians have already vanished to Galt's Gulch from the regular altruistic state collectivist world and now Dagny will have to figure out why she is guilty for continuing to be a producer, a producer that keeps the state collectivists governments in power to continue their looting and destruction of the world.  When will she finally figure it out?  Tune in next week on Aug 12 at your local cinema and find out.

 --  Tue Aug 26, 2014  Here's a good task for an investigative journalist out there in reader land to perform: contact all of President Barack Obama's professors at Columbia University and ask them if they have copies of the grades they gave to each of their students, mainly to Obama.  Since one cannot obtain those transcripts from the staff at Columbia -- they are, for some God only knows reason, sealed -- the only avenue of investigation left is to go directly to Barack's professors.  I'm betting that there is not one professor who can even remember having Barack Obama in ANY of his/her classes at Columbia, much less can they present a copy of any grade they gave to him for attending/completing any class.  This is exactly what Wayne Allyn Root, author of The Murder of The Middle Class, discovered when he attended a recent Columbia class reunion.  Wayne Allyn Root was Barack Obama's classmate -- if Obama even attended -- at Columbia and he could not find one student or one professor who claims to have seen Barack Obama anywhere at Columbia University.  So here's what I'm guessing really happened:  The powers that be enrolled Barack Obama at Columbia University in a clandestine manner for the future purpose of then getting him into Harvard Law School.  Obama never really attended any classes at Columbia -- which is why nobody ever saw him there and why professors have claimed he was never in their class -- and then the powers that be, along with the staff at Columbia who was in on this great hoax, "graduated" Barack Obama so he could then enroll at Harvard Law School.  Coming from Occidental College in LA and transferring to Columbia was the Big Hoax but the powers that be had to do it in order for Obama to then go on to Harvard.  All part of the Big Plan to elect the first black man as President of the US.  They knew that the guilt-ridden American youth and a huge majority of blacks in America would overwhelmingly vote yes for Obama, especially after they rigged his university pedigree that virtually nobody in the major news media has questioned -- except Free Market Duck and other Tea Party/Libertarians.  So, the real Hercules Poirot moment, the Sherlock Holmes discovery, is for somebody to ask each of Obama's professors or TAs at Columbia if they can produce a copy of his grades from their class(es).  My guess is:  Nope, because he never really "attended" Columbia.  Note that I did not ask whether the Columbia University staff, the perps who were in on this Big Scam, could produce any grades for his classes; I am asking each professor whether they can produce a copy of the grade they gave to him for each of their class(es).  If I am correct, they will say NO -- or be afraid and say nothing, which is the same as a non-yes, a NO.  And that will be proof positive that President Barack Obama did not "legitimately" attend Columbia University and also, therefore, did not qualify for admittance into Harvard Law School.  The Obama University Hoax which dragged him into the presidency of the United Sates will probably be revealed in the future as one of the greatest hoaxes and true political conspiracies ever perpetrated upon this nation.  Any volunteers for this investigative journalism?  Afraid of the consequences?  You should be.

--  Fri Aug 22, 2014  Listen up girl friends, shut up and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  Let's get educated here.  According to author Dinesh D'Souza in his book, Obama's America, Unmaking the American Dream, here is a sample excerpt from Michelle Obama's thesis regarding being black at Princeton:  "By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separatist may better understand the desparation [sic] of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight."  As D'souza correctly states, "The grammar is wrong; the tenses are garbled.  People are ignorant 'of' the plight of the lower class, not ignorant 'to' their plight.  And 'desparation' should be spelled 'desperation.'"  As reviewer Christian Hitchens wrote about Michelle's thesis, "These are not mere typos; they reflect an estranged relationship with the English language.  Moreover, they appear not in an off-the-cuff transcript but in a thesis that is supposed to reflect the culmination of one's college career."  As Hitchens further wrote, "To describe it [Michelle's thesis] as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be 'read' at all, in the strict sense of the term.  This is because it wasn't written in any known language."  This is the level of intellectualism that it takes to get a degree from Princeton University.  D'Souza added, "Remarkably Michelle graduated with honors at Princeton and was admitted to Harvard Law School.  And subsequently Michelle was hired by the University of Chicago to run 'programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity, and minority contracting,' with a salary of $316,000 a year.  Yeah, so pour yourself another hot cup of Rocket Java and have a good laugh at what it takes to graduate with honors from Princeton and Harvard.  As a side note, President Obama also attended Harvard where he was President of the Harvard Law Review.  So how many editorials and columns did Obama write for the Harvard Law Review, according to D'Souza's research?  A big fat ZERO!  The upshot:  one could draw the opinion that both President Obama and the First Lady were given special passes at several Ivy League universities (Columbia and Harvard for Barack and Princeton and Harvard for Michelle) because they were black.  If this is true, then it is racism to the nth degree, practiced by institutions of supposed higher learning.

--  Fri Aug 22, 2014  Sec of Defense, Chuckie Cheese Hagel, just popped onto national TV and exclaimed in a surprise voice that maybe the ISIS Islamo fanatics weren't a Jr Varsity team like President Obama called them a coupla weeks ago... and, he continued, we had better take these fellas quite seriously and maybe start reading the Pentagon's G2 intelligence summaries that the President and his administration receives every morning like clock work.  How do I know?  Because I worked with the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence in the Pentagon and Saigon, Vietnam for two years and helped prepare those reports for the then President and Chief of Staff.  Apparently Obama has been throwing these reports into the garbage every day and playing 18 rounds of golf instead.  These reports are top secret crypto with half of them eyes only and if Obama was in the military being considered for this intelligence position he would have failed just on account of all of his past associates such as Bill Ayres, Rev Wright, the Communist Party, socialist affiliations, etc.  And now, this person who could not even qualify for the lowest level "Confidential" security clearance is the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.  What a horrible joke this is for America:  a treasonous NAZI in charge of our nation, becoming a dictator day by day by issuing simple-minded Executive Orders that nobody in Congress or the Judicial Dept will squash as totally illegal.  How long Obama will get away with his obvious dictatorial activities depends on the American sheeple.  When will  they wake up and what are they going to do about it?

--  Fri Aug 22, 2014  Hmm, girl friends, looks like Dictator Obama has broken at least two laws in his release of Pvt Bergdahl in exchange for five Gitmo terrorists:  (1) Obama neglected to give the US Congress 30 days notice of his intent to release Pvt Bergdahl, and (2) Obama neglected to obtain authorization for the funding to perform this action.  The Committee on Whatsmacallit in Washington (who cares what their real name is) just indicted the Obama Administration on both counts, which means the US Congress will call a special Let's Impeach Obama Session over the Labor Day Weekend and the entire US population will rise up and revolt.  Yeah, when hell freezes over.

--  Tue Aug 19, 2014  Never mind the Democratic-created race riots in Ferguson, MO -- created by implementing our nation's welfare ghettoes -- let's ask an important Commander-in-Chief question.  What kind of Commander-in-Chief allows a large portion of his military arsenal to be abandoned and captured by the enemy in the Middle East during an American withdrawal?  What kind of Commander-in-Chief allows the fanatical Muslim terrorists in the Middle East to waltz into a major Iraqi city and take over the bank accounts worth over a half a billion dollars, re-routing the money to other banks so they can continue financing the Muslim fanatics' war against innocent people?  The answer:  President Barack Obama.  What's the problem?  The problem is that the elected president of the United States is automatically ensconced as America's Commander-in-Chief.  That's because America's first president, George Washington, HAPPENED to be an officer in the American Revolutionary War and thus assumed the position of Commander-in-Chief after the War, too.  Now we have the ridiculous anomaly of all subsequent presidents being automatically appointed as Commanders-in-Chief, even though most of them have never served in the military, especially as a higher-up officer with tactical and strategic training or experience.  That's how we get the ridiculous spectacle of a president like Barack Obama, with no military training or experience, coupled with his ideology of "fundamentally transforming America" -- interpreted as fundamentally destroying America and its fundamental principles -- becoming a Commander-in-Chief who has no clue about how to conduct a foreign war.  And so, since Obama was brainwashed as a youth into fanatical Islam, we should not be surprised that he (1) totally screws up as Commander-in-Chief in the Middle East, while simultaneously (2) leans heavily toward the supporting of fanatical Muslims fighting what he perceives to be America's colonial imperialism.  The facts are becoming rather obvious:  Obama is doing everything possible to destroy the United States, its fundamental documents, and America's principles of individualism -- individual freedoms, individual property rights, and free market capitalism.  Funny -- but not really -- how the ideology and goals of the fanatical Muslims in the Middle East are the very same ideology and goals of the national socialists currently running the White House in America.

--  Mon Aug 18, 2014  Democrats created black ghettoes in all the major cities of America by implementing welfare programs.  Little pockets of socialism.  No fathers, more welfare.  More children, more welfare.  Nobody likes a condescending Big Brother, passing out welfare, insinuating that the recipient has no self respect and is nothing but a welfare slave to the state.  So who represents the state?  The cops in the welfare ghetto.  No wonder blacks in the ghetto hate the cops.  And it doesn't matter whether the cops are black or white or pink or purple.  It's a love-hate relationship caused by the welfare state:  gimme my freebies but I hate you for it.  [Note:  this is true for foreign aid on the international level, too.]  This has been going on since at least the 1960s.  In walks President Barrack Obama in 2008 who is hell bent on implementing more state collectivism, more state welfare to fundamentally change America.  Why?  We don't really care at this point since we have already discussed Obama's fallacious economic sophisms for creating socialism ad nauseum.  Suffice it to say that Obama's intelligence level has never gotten past the bankrupt level of classical Marxist socialism.  The point is, the Obama administration knows how to write Hollywood scripts to take advantage of welfare-created racial issues in any city in America.  So last week, 18-year-old black punk Michael Brown and a gangsta buddy (Dorian Johnson) rob a local store in Ferguson, Missouri, steal $47 worth of cigarillos, rough up the store owner on the way out and then both youths proceed to wander down the middle of Main Street, holding up traffic and hurling insults to police officers who try to get the youths out of the middle of the road and to use the sidewalk.  One version of the story at this point is that the cop who hustled -- or tried to hustle -- Michael Brown and accomplice into a cop car because the two wannabe gangsta youths refused to stop traipsing down Main Street blocking traffic did not know -- or may have known -- that the two youths had just robbed a convenience store.  The youths, however, thought the cop was arresting them for robbing the store and therefore started fighting with the cop in the cop car.  From various reports, Michael Brown punched the cop, grabbed his gun, and fired off a round, missing everybody, and then dashed out of the cop car.  According to witnesses who took a video tape of this proceeding, Michael Brown suddenly turned around and ran back toward the pursuing cop like a mad bull.  The cop and several other cops then shot at Michael Brown when he refused to stop charging after they yelled, "Freeze!"  It took six shots to bring down Michael Brown by at least one white cop.  Downtown Brown, the looter, died on Main Street that day.  All of a sudden, the black Obama administration and the standard black shake-down artists, Al Sharpton et associates, scream the magic welfare ghetto word, "Racism!" and all hell breaks lose.  Ghetto blacks turn into street judges, jury, and executioners as hundreds of mostly black youths break into stores and ransack Main Street.  Like stealing flat screen TVs and clothing is justified because the cops shot a black robber whose actions were caught and broadcasted all over America on national TV.  The Democratic Gov of Missouri calls out the National Guard to quell the riot and President Obama takes a golfing break from his vacation at Martha's Vineyard to show up on national TV and pretend like he is shocked by what he has continued to help set up as America's welfare ghettoes.  Imagine this, Obama can't bring himself to send National Guard troops to the southern border to stop hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists from running across the border to the US but it's OK for the National Guard to show up to Ferguson, MO.  Why?  Because the bigger the created "racial" crisis gets in America, the more excuse Obama has of invoking martial law and thus curtailing the 2014 or even the 2016 national elections.  Like this hasn't already been planned out by the Obama administration.  Remember Obama's war cry, "Never let a good crisis go to waste," and this crisis is just one of the many crises that President Obama is implementing to "fundamentally transform America."  Mark my words, President Obama's pretended concern for the race riots in Ferguson is just that:  gross pretension.

--  Sun Aug 17, 2014  Recently published books you should read:  (1)  The Murder of the Middle Class by Wayne Allyn Root, how to save yourself and your family from the criminal conspiracy of the century.  What can you do?  The first step is to recognize who is responsible.  The Murder of the Middle Class exposes the crime and indicts conspirators, from the Obama administration to their willing accomplices in big business, big media, and big unions -- naming names and pointing out their misdeeds.  But Wayne Allyn Root doesn't just prove the crime and profile the suspects, he provides bold solutions to save American capitalism, the middle class, the GOP and YOU!  This middle class warrior gives you the game plan and the weapons to fight back.  Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee, political commentator, international speaker, CEO, serial entrepreneur, branding expert, and champion of small business and the middle class.  He appears on hundreds of radio and TV shows annually -- including FOX News -- and serves as executive vice chairman of the Conservative Caucus.  The second must-read book is: (2) Obama's America, Unmaking the American Dream by Dinesh D'Souza.  This is D'Souza's sequel to his hit movie 2016:  Obama's America.  Can America survive four more years of Barack Obama?  No, says D'Souza, because America as we know it -- wealthy, powerful, assertive -- is not what Obama wants.  He wants a smaller America, a poorer America, and America unable to assert its will, and America happy to be one power among many, an America in decline so that other nations might rise -- all in the name of global fairness.  To Obama, the hated "one percent" isn't just wealthy Americans; it is America itself.  In Obama's view, America needs to be taken down a notch.  [Note:  actually, as Ayn Rand would have said, it is the fundamental moral philosophy of America, the ideas of individualism: individual rights, individual freedoms, and individual responsibility that Obama wants to destroy, and replace the fundamental principles that America was founded upon with Obama's fundamental ideas of state collectivism better known as classic Marxist socialism.]  A third book, also written by Dinesh D'Souza that you should read is: (3) America:  Imagine the World Without Her.  This book goes along with D'Souza's latest movie of the same name.  A synopsis from Wikipedia states, "Setting the stage for a presentation of their views, D'Souza and producer Sullivan provide counterfactual histories in which George Washington is killed during the Revolutionary War, or the country is divided following civil war, creating a world without America that would be vastly worse off. He claims modern leftists are 'telling a new story' however, contradicting traditional veneration for America in order to 'convince a nation to author its own destruction' and 'unmake the America that is here now.' He then challenges several 'indictments' made against the country and American Exceptionalism, including sociology professor and activist Michael Eric Dyson's claim that 'Thievery' was the 'critical element' for 'American empire' and historian and activist Ward Churchill's assertion that the US is the world's new evil empire."  D'Souza says, "... 1960s Chicago radical Saul Alinski, historian Howard Zinn, and others have promoted guilt and resentment regarding wealth inequality that has helped shape the political careers of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

"D'Souza argues that America's wealth has been created, not stolen. He says the $700 used to purchase colonial Manhattan from American Indians could buy many desolate parcels globally today, but that individual industry has made New York real estate worth billions. He states that in Europe, India, and elsewhere most countries have been founded on conquest, and observes that the American pattern of wealth creation hasn't been the universal norm. He cites examples like Arab historian Ibn Khaldun preferring looting to trade and says that merchants form Hinduism’s second-lowest social caste.

"The film argues that American Indians exhibited this "conquest ethic' among themselves, and that most of what American Indian depopulation occurred during European colonization resulted from the accidental transmission of plagues that had earlier devastated Europe, not an intent to wipe out a people. It says modern American Indians have little interest in returning to their hunter-gatherer past. In an interview Senator Ted Cruz compares the Texas Revolution to the American Revolution. Professor and Reconquista advocate Charles Truxillo is contrasted with an interviewed American of Mexican descent who says he has no desire to return to a poverty and crime ridden Mexico and instead wants to live the 'American Dream'.

"D'Souza says that slavery impeded American development, rather than boosting it. The film argues that slavery was an omnipresent phenomenon for most of human history, but that its abolition was 'uniquely Western', noting the rarity of a 'great war fought to end slavery' like the American Civil War. According to the film, the Declaration of Independence essentially says 'liberty is the solution to injustice,' a 'promissory note' cashed throughout history by Americans such as Martin Luther King, Jr.  C.J. Walker, the black entrepreneur and daughter of slaves who is regarded as America's first self made female millionaire, is cited as an example of the type of individual success story the American system allows that is ignored by historians like Zinn because it undermines their leftist narrative. Columbia University economist Jagdish Bhagwati is shown saying that the 'world is embracing the free market,' for which there is 'no reason for us to be apologetic.' The film outlines how free enterprise, consumer choice rather than coercion, has raised living standards by making existing goods cheaper and creating new ones.

"The film challenges the notion that America is a rapacious conqueror by arguing that Americans have sacrificed for human well being around the world, including places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Germany, and Japan, seeking in return only 'enough ground to bury' their dead, as former Secretary of State Colin Powell is quoted as saying. A US veteran of Hanoi Hilton captivity is interviewed discussing his desire to liberate Vietnam. D'Souza reflects on Lincoln's assassination and the continuing cost of freedom, saying that we no longer have past heroes like Washington and Lincoln, but 'we do have us' in 'our struggle for the restoration of America.'”  Both the book and the movie are must-read and must-see for anybody who wants a more objective review of what America is and should continue to be into the future, vs. the national socialist direction that Obama is currently pushing America.

--  Mon Aug 11, 2014  Whoa, girl friends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, listen up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  I got an important question:  what if there is no Allah?  I mean, that is the fundamental question in today's terrorist Jihad, isn't it?  If there is no Allah, then it begs all the other subsequent questions such as, why the hell are the Muslims trying to exterminate the Christians and Jews?  Or, who said that if you, as a Muslim, die while taking out a bunch of "Infidels" riding on a bus to work, then you will go to Heaven and hook up with 72 virgins?  What proof do we have that Allah even exists?  Much less the virgins?  Does anybody have a photograph of Allah?  How about a CD, DVR, tape recording, or any other sound or video device of Allah espousing anything?  Or even tap dancing on a camel's back?  So, if nobody in the Caliphate in the Middle East can produce logical proof that Allah exists, why are thousands of Muslim barbarians running all over Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Iran, and even Europe, Africa, and the US shouting crap that Allah told us to do this, Allah told us to do that, etc.?  If you have some proof that Allah exists, just post it on Face Book or Youtube and let the whole world in on your little secret because, I for one, would like to see some proof that Allah exists and that Allah told Muslims like ISIS, the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Al Dummy et al to run all over the desert and shoot everything that moves.  Looks like most wars throughout history have been fought on Fairytale premises just like this.  The war in the Middle East is simply another example.  The truth is that a group of intellectually emasculated Muslim barbarians have simply conjured up a glob of ridiculous fairytales to justify their barbaric behavior.  Christians, Jews, and adherents of all other Earth religions, you might want to question some of the premises of your moral philosophy, too.  As a footnote, those who are mindlessly following every utterance of Billy Meier and the human ET Plejaren might want to rethink some of the translations regarding basic social-political-economics.  And if you think the English language does not provide enough clarity as high German then you can always read this praxeological information in high German since it was an Austrian economist, Ludwig von Mises, who wrote the original 1,000 page dissertation of free market economics in German.  Those of you who in the Billy Meier-Plejaren school of thought think English is just as developed as high German can read it in English.  Are you listening, translators of the Plejaren contact notes, those of you who have fallen for the false baloney that the English language does not lend itself to the nuances and supposed complexities of the German language?  Not referring to the Henoch embedded vibrational codes, of course.  That's another story.  Billy Meier followers should rethink their premises and think for themselves instead of blindly following what could include many economics and political sophisms being put forth by those who have been so long removed from Earth's level of evolution that they no longer can conceive of the intellectual evolutionary stage that we must go through to reach that of the Plejaren's.  I suspect the main problem is an error in translation in that those doing the translations from Plejaranese to English are filtering their translations through left liberal rose-colored glasses.  Those who do not know what I am talking about can log onto and choose English to read all about it.  Still, back to the scene of the crime, there is no Allah and the ISIS terrorists have no logical reason to be performing their barbarous acts anywhere in the world -- same for everybody else in every other nation, too.

--  Fri Aug 08, 2014  Now that the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda have nearly taken over all of Iraq using American weapons given to them by our "fast and furious" idiot President, our Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama, he dashed onto national TV today to "save a group of cornered Iraqi civilians" by ordering American war planes to bomb ISIS.  That's after telling our Middle Eastern enemies everything tactical and strategic about the mission.  Such as, he will not put any boots on the ground, he will be sending F-16 fighter planes, and the US will be dropping food and water to the cornered civilians at 3 pm Eastern Standard Time.  Why not tell ISIS the names and addresses of the F-16 bomber pilots so the Jihadists in America can target the US pilots' American wives and families?  President Obama is NOT an executive; he is NOT a Commander-in-Chief.  He is strictly a marketeer, a salesman selling his tired old left liberal politics written by Hollywood script writers to all the young university students across America.  He is the mouth piece for branding the Democratic Party.  That is all he knows how to do.  So, what does he do when it's time to go to battle?  He either plays golf or goes onto national TV and reads the US's battle plan ver batim off a teleprompter as if he was selling the Democratic Party for re-election in 2014.  Yes indeed.  I am sending in fighter bombers, vote for me.  They will be flying from the West and North and carrying surface to ground missiles, showing up, oh, how about 2 or 3 pm, if that's OK with you guys in the Muslim Brotherhood?  And if elected, I promise you can keep your doctor, you can keep your current medical plan, and the IRS is not targeting the Tea Party, "not even a smidgeon," deserter Bergdahl is a war hero because I cleverly traded him for releasing five -- count 'em, one, two, three, four, five -- Muslim Brotherhood bad guys from Gitmo so they could get back into the Middle East war.  Maybe we'll see them in New York.  Who knows?  If our battle plans change, I will be sure to show up on national TV and radio and telegraph all our top secret moves to the Taliban and ISIS...because... I'm the Commander-in-Chief, my ratings are down, and we need to beat the Republicans in 2014 and 2016.  Hallelujah and God bless America... and Mohammed... OK, God bless Buddha, too.

--  Thur Aug 07, 2014  Here's an interesting question:  what type of moral philosophy takes hundreds of millions of dollars donated as foreign aid to rebuild schools, hospitals, and churches and instead uses that money to build 40 concrete tunnels from one city to a neighboring city in order to kidnap and murder the target city's inhabitants?  What type of moral philosophy creates a fictitious omniscient that its adherents claim instructs them to wipe out an entire neighboring culture?  We're talking about a fanatical sect of Islam and its adherents called Hamas in the Middle East.  And you can add the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda to that list of crazies, too.  The target culture that Hamas et al. is trying to eradicate is Israel.  Hamas took over the political scene in the Palestinian Gaza Strip and is pretending that an omniscient has told them to exterminate all Jews in the world.  What kind of moral philosophy is that?  On a universal scale, what type of evolutional intelligence does it take to make this type of claim?  All Palestinians are not members of Hamas.  But one of the problems in the Middle East is that those Palestinians, those Islamists, who claim that they do not believe in the same genocidal tenets as Hamas, are doing nothing to curtail Hamas' Jihad against Israel and the United States.  Not doing anything and keeping one's Islamic mouth shut makes the Do-Nothings just as guilty as the crazies in Hamas.  Silence is the same as going along with the program.  This condition of condoning the war in the Middle East by doing nothing against those who have hijacked one's religion would be tantamount to the major Christian religions in the US standing by and allowing a fanatical group like the KKK to enact a program of genocide against whichever ethnic group the KKK thinks God told them to eradicate.  The illogic of the Islamist fanatics is contradictory and ridiculous at face value:  First Hamas, ISIS, and the Muslim Brotherhood create an omniscient and then they imbue said omniscient with stupid human activities in order to do what an omniscient -- by definition of being all powerful -- doesn't need humans to do for said omniscient.  Why would an omniscient who is all powerful need boob-heads on planet Earth to do what he or she could do all by him/herself?  In fact, why would an all powerful omniscient create a group of people on planet Earth and then ask another group of people to eradicate the former?  It is illogical to create the idea of an omniscient and then attribute human attributes to said omniscient.  That's called anthropomorphism, not to mention contradictory.  If I was a human ET flying by planet Earth in my beam ship and saw what was going on between the major earth religions (moral philosophies), I would probably just shake my head and say, "Pass!"

--  Sat July 26, 2014  Listen up, girl friends.  Pull up the barn floor and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  President Obama has now started a civil war in the United States.  After Congress voted "No" three times against Obama's so-called Dream Act, which was nothing but amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants who have run across our southern border into the US, Obama then orchestrated a huge influx -- tens of thousands per month -- of illegal immigrant youths from Central America to storm across the Mexican-US border and demand citizenship.  Over 50,000 youths paying thousands of dollars each to drug cartels to ship them to the US border via Mexico have flooded our borders.  This was planned last year by the Obama Administration as they sent out an RFQ (Request For Quote) by the DHS (Dept of Homeland Security) asking for vendors who could supply transportation, shelter, etc. for an expected 65,000 plus immigrants who would be streaming across the border this summer.  I.e., the Obama Administration ORCHESTRATED, that is pre-planned, this entire mess in which children are being trafficked by drug cartels into sex slavery, drug gangs, and bringing in "Uncle Jose" druggies as "relatives" of these poor hapless children.  Jihadist terrorists are also among those flooding the border and they will no doubt pop up later with bombs to help destroy the US.  The Obama Administration has sent thousands of children to all states in the US in an effort to -- as his administration describes it -- redistribute the ethnic makeup of what our imperial President thinks are suburbs that are "too white."  These are the suburban whites that Obama claims should not have fled inner city ghettoes, ghettoes which look like war zones and are a direct result of America's federal and state welfare programs.  And now that Texas Gov Rick Perry has sent 1,000 National Guard soldiers to stop this Obama-created fiasco at the Texas border, President Obama just met yesterday with the Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador to discuss the possibility of his (Obama's) issuing another illegal Executive Order to ostensibly pre-qualify those nations' illegal immigrants in their native countries so they will already have "legal papers" and thus be able to just fly into the US without having to first go to Mexico and then running across the border.  This is tantamount to President Obama declaring a civil war against the American taxpayer.  Without using guns or militia, Obama and his socialist czars in the Oval Office are simply issuing new Executive Orders, twisting the law, to invade America.  This is no different than a foreign nation sending hundreds of thousands of "welfare soldiers" to the US to purposely overwhelm our already over-burdened welfare system and thus financially bankrupt the US.  There are two ways to destroy a nation:  guns and bullets or financial bankruptcy.  President Obama is making use of both methods at two different levels:  (1) his latest border fiasco to bankrupt the civil services of America, and (2), the international level, supplying military arms and foreign aid to our enemies in the Middle East.  If one were to sit down in a War Room and try to figure out how to attack, invade, and destroy America, one could not have come up with a better plan than what President Obama is currently inflicting upon the United States.  From implementing ObamaCare to using the IRS to target Americans to all the other illegal imperial orders he is issuing, President Obama has now totally emasculated the US Congress and pulled the Judicial Dept -- run by his buddy US AG Eric Holder -- into his Executive Dept.  There are no longer three branches of government.  There is only one:  Dictator Obama and his Imperial Executive Dictatorship, running an 18th Century Marxist Playbook.  Look around you:  Pied Piper Obama has implemented Marxist state collectivism against the American people, against our Founding Fathers' moral philosophical principles of individual rights and responsibilities embedded in the US Constitution.  On the international level, Obama has created the groundwork for WW III as he supports the Middle East Caliphate bombing the crap out of Israel and many Middle Eastern nations.  This was all easily predicted back in 2008 as soon we saw who Obama hung out with and how he was educated.  Then again, what does all of this say about the voters who voted for Barack Obama?  And the so-called intellectuals who are running our educational institutions?  Who is John Galt?  Better yet, where is Ragnar Danneskjold?

--  Tues July 22, 2014  News Flash!!  Court ruling means Idaho could have avoided ObamaCare mandates, taxes.  According to a recent report from Wayne Hoffman's Idaho Freedom Foundation, "A federal appeals court ruling means Idaho needlessly exposed its residents and businesses to Obamacare's employer and individual mandates by creating a state insurance exchange," Idaho Freedom Foundation President Wayne Hoffman said today.  "The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the Internal Revenue Service erred when it wrote rules allowing insurance subsidies in states that have not set up a state insurance exchange.  Under the plain wording of the Obamacare statute, individuals and businesses are subject to Obamacare penalties in states where tax subsidies are available, but those subsidies are only available in states that choose a state insurance exchange.  In other words, states that do not set up a state exchange shield their residents and businesses from possible Obamacare penalties; states that do develop an insurance exchange, as Idaho did, can use the subsides, but they're also exposed to penalties.  Idaho Freedom Foundation and the Cato Institute provided these details to state lawmakers and Governor Otter on multiple occasions, but they chose to establish a state exchange anyway.  This ruling validates our position that the state not only didn't need to establish an insurance exchange but that also that Idaho's exchange has become the vehicle for enforcing Obamacare's penalty provisions," said Hoffman, who was a member of the Governor's 2012 taskforce studying the possibly of creating an insurance exchange. "We encourage lawmakers and the governor to keep monitoring this issue and consider action necessary to protect the state, its residents and businesses from Obamacare's taxes and penalties. If the ruling stands, it means repealing the state exchange.  The ruling likely faces additional appeals and the case could ultimately land in the U.S. Supreme Court."  [Note:  As Freemarketduck has stated over and over that Idaho's setting up of an Obamacare socialist state health care exchange would mean that we would then be subject to all the enforcement rules of Obamacare and leave us with no legal recourse to refute those rules, we have now seen exactly what this means, from this recent US Court of Appeals.  Thanks a lot Gov Otter for, once again, erroneously interpreting what happens when you join forces with the federal government, accept their statist premises, and try to appease and compromise with state collectivist ideologies.  Obama and his thugs in Washington DC needed the sanction of their victims, and that is exactly what you, Gov Otter, provided to them when you voluntarily forced Idaho into Obamacare.]

--  Sun July 20, 2014  Hot diggity dog!  Russia has now shot down a commercial airliner flying 33,000 feet over the Ukraine, killing several hundred passengers and crew aboard.  President Obama and his cigar-smoking commie czars in the White House must be sitting around laughing their little butts off about their good fortune.  Now all the major news media have dashed over to yesterday's airliner blowup and stopped reporting on Obama's illegal trafficking of thousands of Hispanic children into America to destroy our suburbs.  Hooray!  Saved by a Putin plane crash.  Last week it was the trafficking of thousands of illegal immigrant children from Central America that saved -- saved?? -- Obama from his IRS Director and Lois "blank stare" Lerner's "missing emails" on all her and other IRS officials' supposedly "crashed hard drives" -- which everybody knows is NOT where emails are stored -- that reveal how the Obama Administration was purposely targeting Conservative political groups in denying them 501 c 4 exemption status.  And the week before that, the same IRS debacle saved Obama from the Bergdahl-5 bad Jihadists from Gitmo debacle.  And the week before the Bergdahl trade for 5 bad Jihadists from Gitmo, it was... never mind... it just goes on and on and on.  This president is working overtime to create as many national crises as possible in order to stymie Congress and the American people.  Nobody seems to know what to do.  The Founding Fathers set up 3 branches of government as a check and balance on each other but nobody thought of setting up a government solution that could take care of a President and DOJ who are conspiring to take down the government and crash it into total civil war.  The President totally ignores Congress's laws and simply issues his own Executive Orders that countermand the nation's laws with a US Attorney General who refuses to do anything about it.  Congress says they can defund Obama's programs but guess what?  The private Federal Reserve can print up as much credit and fake paper as they want and fork it over to President Obama in all sorts of ways, openly and clandestine.  The CIA receives money not in the US budget.  Obama has already used budgets in all the major bureaus in the nation, FDA, EPA, etc. to buy up as much ammunition for firearms that he can get away with in order to create a severe shortage of ammunition for American citizens who refuse to give up their guns.  Obama has signed into law his ability to declare martial law and if he can do that, then he and his national thugs can take over the US Treasury and create as much real or phony money as they want.  Plus ration all goods and services.  The only question left today is: what crisis is the Obama Administration planning right now during this temporary news break focusing on the shooting down of a commercial airliner by the Russians in the Ukraine?  Maybe Abduhl qua Jose running across our southern border is hooking up the wires in his suitcase nuke while sitting in his room at one of our major city's whoop-tee-doo hotels?  Nobody checks suitcases in hotels.  Maybe there are 10 Abduhls performing this same function all across America?  Kaboom!  Whaddaya know?  Time for Obama's martial law and rations and NO ELECTIONS.  How clever...  Welcome to the Pied Piper's Saul Alinksy invasion and takeover of the United States...  looky looky at my left hand while I stab you in the back with my right hand... and then blame it all on the Tea Party...

--  Wed July 16, 2014  The method to Obama's Border Madness is that he is purposely flooding the US southern border with illegal immigrant children from Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Mexico in order to redistribute what he calls the unfair demographics of ethnicity in America's suburbs.  In other words, Obama's racist czars are not only using former President George Bush's absurd law that allows illegal immigrants under 18 years of age from non-contiguous countries in South America to NOT be deported, he is also conspiring -- that's right, CONSPIRING -- with HUD's (Housing and Urban Development) bureau called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) to bus, fly, or transport by whatever means possible, thousands of illegal immigrants from our southern borders to middle and northern American cities.  Specifically, the feds are sending illegal immigrants to suburbs of predominantly white ethnic communities -- without informing the Governors or anybody else in those states and communities.  In short, because all kinds of people -- black, white, Hispanic, Asian, and probably Martians in green suits -- fled most all of America's inner cities, because they are crime-ridden ghettoes that were created by the federal government's welfare programs, the Obama Administration is hell bent on turning America's suburbs into outer city ghettoes with new federal welfare programs.  In short, the Obama Administration reasons that inner city ghettoes were created because "whites" fled to the suburbs.  Obama is claiming that it is a racial issue rather than a government welfare problem.  So he is now intent on dragging illegal immigrant Hispanic children and their families to the suburbs to "solve" this problem by implementing socialist welfare programs there.  As if socialist welfare programs in the suburbs will turn out differently than socialist welfare programs in our major cities.  The problem of crime and poverty in our inner cities is not due to whites fleeing to the suburbs.  The problem is socialist welfare programs per se, not the fleeing of whites, or anybody else, to the suburbs.  It is becoming more and more obvious that President Obama is turning into an Imperialistic dictator and becoming very vindictive when Congress and ordinary citizens rebuke him for his socialist actions.  In his zeal to redistribute the ethnic demographics of suburbia in America, Obama has turned into a trafficker of human beings, specifically children, in a mad attempt to implement his national socialist political objectives.  Obama is implementing the very racism he says suburbanites created by fleeing America's ghettoes.  His solution is ridiculous because his stated "problem" is false.  Socialist welfare programs in America's major cities is not due to whites fleeing to suburbia. Obama's continual attack against the ideas of freedom embedded in our US Constitution and Bill of Rights shows that he is a stupid individual, not an intelligent person who follows objective logic and reason.  We do not need the government to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to ship illegal immigrants to communities in a wild ass attempt to play social engineering games with Americans.  Obama should be careful since he is walking a thin line now as even Democrats are beginning to wise up to his true intentions and actions.  It is rumored that border patrol agents in the DHS are refusing to allow their DHS bosses to send in swat teams against suburban protestors who are blocking busloads of Illegals to travel into their communities.  There is mutiny in the border patrol ranks, as border patrol officers are refusing to act against their fellow American citizens.  Hopefully this will get back to the Central American countries and thus bring a halt to Obama's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing bull$hit program.  Oh by the way, how many Abduhls are sneaking across the border with suitcase nukes, pretending to be Jose, Maria's uncle, in this latest Obama fiasco?  Raise your hand if you still think Obama is not intentionally trying to destroy what he thinks is "imperialist" America.

--  Tues July 15, 2014  A Texas rancher near the Mexican border where thousands of Illegals traipse across his property every year discovered an interesting book along his fence line:  an Urdu to English/English to Urdu dictionary.  What is Urdu?  Urdu is the major native language of Pakistan.  Conclusion:  some of the Illegals traipsing across our southern borders are not South Americans, they are Middle Easterners.  One can assume that these Middle Eastern Illegals are quite possibly Jihadist terrorists blending in with Illegals from Mexico, Honduras, and Guatemala who the Obama Administration have encouraged to flood across America's borders to overwhelm our border patrol.  How did the Obama Administration accomplish this?  By sending information to said above nations that if they send youths 18 years or younger, or said youths accompanied by relatives, they cannot be deported under recent American law signed by former Prez George Bush.  How do we know that the Obama Administration purposely planned this Illegal immigration from non-contiguous South American countries?  Simple.  We have the proof.  In Feb 2014, the Dept of Homeland Security sent out an RFQ -- Request for Quote -- to venders who could accommodate -- food, clothing, transportation -- a huge influx of Illegals from Central America, which the RFQ said could exceed over 65,000 immigrants this summer, 2014.  In other words, the Obama Administration not only communicated this information to Central American nations, they set up a budget to pay for this mass exodus, and asked vendors to bid on it.  The RFQ email is easily obtained on the Internet.  In addition, the US sends hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid to each of these Central American nations each year -- as well as some $500 million annually to Mexico, God only knows what for.  All of these nations' governments are in cahoots with their local drug cartels running the Obama Administration's abuse of children immigration scheme.  Last year, some 6,000 or so Illegal youths ran across the border.  This year it is over 55,000.  Next year it is estimated to be over 150,000.  This is truly an abuse of children that Obama is participating in since many of the children are sexually abused en route and sent into "sex slave" markets once they leave their home country.  To say that President Obama doesn't know about this child abuse means that he doesn't have a clue about what his Dept of Homeland Security is doing or else he does know and doesn't give a damn.  The fact is, Obama refuses to even look into this problem because it is obvious from his recent TV appearances that he supports it and even helped create it.  Whether Obama is aware of the Middle Eastern terrorists who are coming across the border with the Illegal South Americans, we don't know.  But we can guess.  If he doesn't know, he's not paying attention to his daily intelligence reports.  If he does know, he's guilty as hell for the future havoc that may result from his dereliction of duty.  In addition, the Obama Administration has sent tons of lawyers to the border to help the Illegals immigrate into the US and has forbid DHS employees to take cell phone pictures for the news media as well as making each DHS employee sign a nondisclosure agreement to keep this information quiet.  This constitutes malice aforethought and proves the point that Obama has placed himself in a position of treason against America.  And, our US DOJ Eric Holder, is standing firm with President Obama on this issue.  That means the Dept of Justice, in cahoots with the Executive Dept, is purposely laying the groundwork for another possible internal Jihadist attack against America.  Why?  All you have to do is look at who Obama and Holder grew up with, who influenced their social-political-economic views and you have your answer.  And all of this -- all of it -- was known long before Obama was elected President of the US.  Of course if anybody were to bring this up, they would be called a racist.  Look for a future incident by Jihadists in America, and then prepare for Obama to call for martial law, suspending the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution which he has publicly spoken against throughout his entire life.  He has told you in no uncertain terms where he stands and what he is intending to do to America.  Believe him, he really means it.  He is the Pied Piper for many youths, not just American suckers who were brought under his spell and voted for him, but also South American suckers who are being enticed into the US by drug coyotes.  In the long run, this is a case of the blind leading the blind.

--  Sun June 29, 2014  Now that the US has lost the war in Iraq, and the Mulsim Jihadists have taken back most of the major cities in Iraq, President Obama is sending 300 military "ADVISORS" --  really, "advisors?" -- back into that hell hole in order to... do what?  Nobody knows since there is never a stated objective to the war in the Middle East.  Is it to retrain the same American-trained Iraqi military deserters who threw down their weapons and uniforms the minute they saw the ISIS Jihadists storming across the desert?  The US taxpayer has spent a trillion dollars to:  build the largest consulate in the world in Baghdad, supply Iraq with military weapons from guns and bullets to tanks and rocket propelled grenades and uniforms and lollipops for whichever Muslim regime happens to be in charge at any given time, and nothing has stopped the onslaught of the Muslim Jihadists in the Middle East.  In fact, all of these military supplies -- what a shock -- have now fallen into the hands of the Muslim Jihadists and are being used against us.  Follow the money.  The Federal Reserve is cleaning up by printing up trillions of non-backed Petro Dollars and financing the Middle East war.  The Military Industrial Complex is cleaning up selling tons of equipment to the Camel Drivers of the Middle East.  Obama and Hillary are bungling everything by trying to run guns in a "fast and furious" debacle to whom they thought were our supporters with weapons ending up in the wrong hands.  When Obama and Hillary tried to fix their bungling, the result was the Benghazi murders of our US Ambassador and others in Libya.  Obama claimed the US was out of the Middle East, the war was over, we won, la-dee-dah and Michelle Obama is busy sucking on purple lollipops at the Vatican.  Give us a break, Mr. President.  Did we learn nothing from Vietnam, where we sent in thousands of "advisors" over and over until we finally had to cut and run, leaving Saigon to the Viet Cong, Chicoms, and NVA?  Wake up Obama; read a history book.  Hint:  you cannot "PARTNER" with Third World nations to fight their petty little civil wars unless you are serious about fighting it no holds barred.  Otherwise, it will backfire on you.  As usual, the Third World "trainees" will take your money and run, and then revolt against you.  For many reasons.  Social, political, economic, cultural.  Now that the war in Iraq is ha-ha "over," and the Muslim Jihadists are storming back in and taking over, Obama wants to send $500 million more dollars to the Syrian Army to help fight against the ISIS Jihadists storming across Iraq.  But wait.  We already did that.  May I remind the President that the composition of the ISIS Jihadists storming across Iraq include those who the US previously supplied money and arms to in Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, and Lower Slobovia.  We are simply financing our own destruction with no logical military, social, political or economic objective in mind.  If you are really going to fight a war, then fight it.  Otherwise, why not just lock yourself in a room and throw hand grenades at your own ass?  When will the US politicians learn that until the people themselves in the Middle East rise up against the Muslim Jihadists instead of just sitting there with their thumbs up their butts, no amount of American or any other foreign aid will change the social political economics of the Middle East.  Like Vietnam, politicians should not be running the war.  Anybody with half a brain can figure out that President Obama's actions are about 2 millimeters away from outright supporting the Muslim Brotherhood and the Caliphate now forming in the Middle East.  On the US home front of this same battle, look for Muslim terrorists sneaking across the Mexican-US border mixed in with Obama's purposely-created onslaught of Central American youth flooding across our southern borders to create a crisis for ICE and our border patrol.  This, too, will backfire as these hidden terrorists could easily bring in suitcase nukes, fan out across the US to hook up with their clandestine "bros" and detonate said bombs anywhere in the US.  After which time, Obama can then claim martial law, which will ignite a US civil war, and then it could escalate into WW III throughout Europe as their enclaves of millions of Muslim Jihadists living in European ghettoes revolt against their host countries.  I'm talking about France, Germany, Britain, etc.  Pay attention Americans.  Obama's Daily Dose of Crises all across the US is becoming very revealing -- and tiresome.  It's his idea of an American Caliphate:  The IRS debacle, the NSA folly, the VA Medical Joke, the Bergdahl-Gitmo Trade Absurdity, the Borderless Border Bombshell, and the ObamaCare Fiasco, to mention just a few.  President Obama has BIG plans for you and they all revolve around his "fundamentally changing America" to pay for what he thinks is the "Imperialism" and "Colonialism" by America in the past.  Just like Mommy and Daddy taught him.  And, so far, nobody is stopping Obama, The Pied Piper, who history is already revealing will probably be the worst president ever for the US.  Philosophically speaking, we are in a war of the individual vs. the collective, a war of ideas:  individual/private property rights and responsibilities vs. the Omnipotent Collectivist State.  So far, the Collectivist State is winning.  Welcome to The Borg.

--  Sun June 22, 2014  Pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, girl friends.  Looks like we now live in the novel '1984' in which up is down, left is right, black is white, and non-existent WMDs in Iraq have suddenly appeared out of nowhere right in the middle of Iraq.  The ISIS Muslim Jihadists have now taken over a big chunk of Iraq, including a compound at which Saddam Hussein stored chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.  Hey, wait a minute.  Up until two weeks ago, all the news media in America have been reporting for a decade that the US invaded Iraq and found no WMDs.  Now, all the news media are reporting that ISIS Jihadists are in control of Saddam Hussein's non-existent WMDs.  So which is it?  Was Saddam Hussein harboring WMDs or not?  Are we living in Alice in Wonderland in which for 10 years there are no WMDs in Iraq and then all of a sudden there are now WMDs?  Welcome to the world in which the Cheshire Cat stands on his own head, mice pop up out of tea pots singing, "Twinkle, twinkle lit bat, how I wonder where're you're at," and blonde babes fall down rabbit holes to discover the Queen of Hearts.  Uh-huh.  Next thing you know, Barack Obama will turn up with a real birth certificate showing how he was born at the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas, on the 4th of July and fought alongside Jim Bowie.

--  Sun June 15, 2014  OK, It's Sunday.  What new crisis has the Obama Administration created now?  At the beginning of last week, like Monday, it was the VA Medical crisis.  70% of the VA Medical centers across the US were creating fraudulent lists of VA signups in order to lie to their bosses in Washington about what a wonderful job they were doing for our military veterans so Administrators in the VA medical facilities could pull down big salary raises.  Then, for Tuesday's crisis of the day, the President traded US Army deserter Sgt Bowe Bergdahl for the release of five hardened Taliban mass murderers from Gitmo.  This was done to (a) cover up the VA Medical Mess dominating the news media, and (b) allow Obama to openly support the Muslim Brotherhood while pretending to save one poor, captured, tortured soldier who -- lies upon lies -- "honorably served" in the US Army.  Then, by Wednesday, we had Obama's next "created crisis" -- right out of his socialist playbook:  tens of thousands of South American illegals ran across our southern borders to claim, "Yarriba, OK, I surrender, send me to Detroit or Honolulu."  Hundreds of thousands of illegals who are under age 18 and thus cannot be "legally" deported turned in their coupons for free tickets to ride to any city in the US.  Yahoo for Obama, trying to create a bigger Democratic voting class by playing Border Santa Claus.  Then, for Friday's crisis of the day to cover up all the news about the illegals storming across the border to become future Democrats, Obama revealed how he had no idea whatsoever that the Islamic-Syrian-Iraqi-Dinkleberries (ISIS) had blitzkrieged across most of Iraq, taking no prisoners, reclaiming major cities, and were on the verge of taking back Baghdad.  Where was Obama during his intelligence briefing on Thursday?  Who knows, but on Friday he jumped into his Air Force One Playboy Jet, flew off to California and and gave a fund-raiser speech to students at Low to No IQ High School.  In the afternoon, he played golf in Palm Springs which has over 120 golf courses in the middle of a water drought.  What's Obama going to do about Iraq?  Nothing since it was, multiple choice:  (a) George Bush's fault, (b) we have the Taliban "on the run," (c) everything is "looking stable and secure," or (d) I hope Ghana beats the US in the World Cup next Monday because I like basketball.  For those who still don't get it, Obama is purposely creating crisis after crisis after crisis via the Saul Alinsky Revolution by Crisis Method that he learned from Marxist Mommy and Daddy and Granny and Grandpa -- plus tutors on Mercer Island in Seattle during his youth -- to totally overthrow America's Constitution and free market capitalism.  So what is the new big Saul Alinsky crisis that Obama and his Behind The Scenes Brown Shirts plan on staging?  Martial law?  A civil war?  World War III?  Hey, what ever happened to the initial atrocity against America called ObamaCare?

--  Sat June 14, 2014  Wow, Border Babies Invade US Southern Borders.  What a coincidence that tens of thousands -- soon to be hundreds of thousands -- of Guatemalan, Honduran, Mexican, and other Hispanic youths under age 18 have all shown up simultaneously to dash across the borders of our southern states:  Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and California.  After dashing across the border and purposely running right into the arms of the astonished American border patrol, the illegal immigrants smooch them and yell, "OK, I give up!"  Since it's against the law to deport youths 18 years or younger, the American border patrol has no other choice except to sign them up as "visitors," hand them a piece of paper to sign that says, "Uh-huh, you betchum, I promise to return to the local courthouse in San Antonio or Nogales or Dry Gulch next Tuesday to plead my case," and then the border patrol gives them a free ticket -- courtesy of the American taxpayers -- to go to ANY city they want in the United States.  Of course, the illegal immigrants NEVER show up to court and hippity-hop with their cell phones to whatever city they choose.  I'd pick Honolulu.  Surf's up.  How about you?  The Big Question is:  who sent out the email to everybody in South America advertising that it's Free Immigration Season in the United States?  Some political analysts say it's just part of President Barack Obama's Big Plan to "fundamentally transform America."  All the hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants pouring into the US over our southern borders are expected to be very grateful to Uncle Obama, their new Sugar Santa Claus, by voting for Obama's National Socialist Party, aka the Democrats, in the very near future.  It would be rather hilarious if the new illegals jumped party lines and voted instead for the Republicans.  Like, what do they know about one political party from another?  Most of them can't even spell "Obama."  If the GOP was smart, they would send Welcome Wagons filled with tacos and pinatas and yell, "Welcome to America, vote for me!"  Too bad nobody is passing out free birth control pills, too.  Oh, by the way, how many Al Qaeda terrorists with the knowledge about how to build nuclear suitcase bombs are sneaking across the border with all the illegals?  Apparently nobody knows and, what's worse, Obama doesn't really care.

--  Sat May 31, 2014  Obama dumped VA Health Secretary Eric Shinseki yesterday not because of all the deaths and mismanagement that have been going on over the last umpteen years at the VA Medical centers but rather because he has to cover up the fact that what happened at the VA medical centers is exactly what socialized health care -- specifically ObamaCare -- must inexorably morph into in the future.  The problem is not personnel; the problem is the system per se, the state collectivist nature of the system.  What happened at the VA would never have happened in a free market.  Heads would have rolled a long time ago and any medical system that operated as the VA did would have gone bankrupt.  Medical clients in an open market would have immediately opted out for another competing medical facility.  The VA medical debacle in which vets were not put on waiting lists, never seen by doctors, and other vets put on fake lists for two weeks after waiting on another list for months or years so the fake two-week list could be sent to VA bosses in Washington in order to obtain salary raises and bonuses is exactly the type of socialist bureaucratic crap that will occur under ObamaCare.  That is why President Obama had to quickly dismiss VA Sec Shinseki: to stop the continued investigation and get on with the pretended solution to this socialist VA medical problem.  Think about it:  why couldn't the VA medical system simply be a voucher system in which returning vets could go to their own private doctors?  We didn't have to create a state collectivist VA medical system, but we did.  And now we see the results.  Is anybody learning from this?  It's no different than the socialist medical systems in Sweden, Britain, Germany, Cuba, China, the former USSR and all other countries that have tried socializing their health care systems.  And this goes for all commodities or services in the market, not just health care.  The postal service, Amtrak, etc. lose billions of dollars every quarter and still we persist in financing these economic albatrosses.  Will America learn its lesson from the VA health care debacle?  Probably not.  Because Americans do not see it as endemic to the system of state collectivism; they see the problem as one of personnel.  Just change the guy in charge and socialism -- if they even recognize it as such -- will work, they think.  It's not the socialist in charge that makes the system unworkable; it's the system itself.  Mainly because it violates all universal laws such as the Law of Identity and the Law of Cause and Effect.  Socialism is simply Communism on the installment plan.  The US will end up in a civil war and an international war unless Americans finally figure out that state collectivism -- Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's progressive socialism -- is the problem.  Free minds and free markets are the answer, not more government controls.

--  Tue May 27, 2014  Everybody should take a good look at how the US Veterans hospitals are run.  The are a foreshadowing of how the ObamaCare national health care system will run, only much much worse since it will be huge.  Notice that not only are the VA medical facilities not responsive to their clients, they have fabricated phony lists to report to their bosses in Washington DC how great they are doing.  Two medical lists:  one listing when the veteran first called or signed up for care, and then another list -- a false list -- of updated calls and sign ups for care for the months or years AFTER the real doctor's visit or call.  In other words, the VA centers were lying to their bosses in DC, rigging the updated listing of patient visits to show that the patients were being taken care of in a timely fashion when, in reality, patients were lingering for months or years without any contact or care whatsoever.  Some 40 or more patients died while waiting for the VA medical center to respond to them.  No hospital in the private sector would dare treat their clients this way.  They would soon go out of business.  But government bureaucracies do not have to respond to their clients, only their Washington DC bosses to get pay raises.  Watch out Americans.  If you think the VA medical debacle is bad, wait until we get full blown ObamaCare.

--  Fri May 16, 2014  What's the Vatican up to lately?  Pope Francis says all governments should redistribute their peoples' wealth to the poor, downtrodden masses.  How droll.  How about if Pope Francis and His Merry Gang of Cardinals redistribute their $10 fricking billion dollars worth of art, gold, silver, and bank accounts to all the poor, downtrodden masses first, you know, as a sign of good faith -- pun intended?  I mean, what the hell -- pun intended -- is one of the major Earth religions doing with billions and billions of dollars worth of idol worship and other Earthly junk?  Rumor has it that two previous Popes were actually poisoned (made to look like a heart attack, beep-beep, heart attack, uh huh, you bet) by an inner circle of Vatican Cardinals who were being investigated for siphoning off millions of bucks for themselves.  So Pope Francis is proposing all governments institute altruistic state collectivism -- a polite term for socialism, fascism, and communism -- as great forms of social political economic institutions.  Has Pope Francis not read recent history of the last 100 years?  Does he really not understand how socialism in all countries that have tried it has turned into the most murderous regimes ever recorded, including the Holocaust?  Has he not been to North Korea, Communist China, the former USSR, the Middle East, Cuba and on and on?  Does Pope Francis have his holy history-head stuck up his dumbed down derriere?  Has he not heard of individual rights and free markets as the best provider and natural distributor of wealth in the entire history of humankind on planet Earth?  Capitalism has lifted millions up out of poverty while socialism has enslaved and murdered millions.  What are we supposed to think of the moral philosophy of the Vatican when the Head Cardinal, Pope Francis, utters such social political economic nonsense as redistributing the wealth created by producers?

--  Fri May 16, 2014  Just spent the last hour listening to the Idaho Governor debates on Idaho Public TV. Coupla loons in there, for sure.

Who won?

Well, it wasn't Harvey D. Brown, the crazy biker and it wasn't Bayes the Bearded Bible Banger.

The fact that everybody knows that Gov Otter insisted on including Brown and Bayes in the Governor's debate does not bode well for him. I think Senator Russ Fulcher will gain a few notches on the votes in next Tuesday's Primary Elections because most individuals in Idaho hate ObamaCare (implemented by Gov Otter), dislike federal control of education (Common Core), and want the feds off Idaho lands. Those are the issues and everybody knows Gov Otter has failed miserably on all of them.  The other important issue -- as Senator Russ Fulcher pointed out -- is that Idaho's budget is 36% in hock to the federal government.  What does that mean?  That means the federal government currently owns Idaho.  If Idaho doesn't do what the feds say, Washington pops the monetary tit right out of Idaho's mouth and forces us into bankruptcy.  Think Idaho education dollars; think think health care dollars; think all kinds of other money and earmarks coming to Idaho from the federal government.  It's like being in extortion debt to The Mob.  How does one ever get out from under it?  And who pays for this?  49 other states through taxation and hyperinflation of our monetary system by the Federal Reserve, printing up bogus dollars.  Idaho is somebody's slave and that somebody is the federal government.  President Obama says, "JUMP!" and Gov Otter says, "HOW HIGH?"  Because Otter thinks he's a "realist."

It doesn't matter how many Idaho legislators were tricked into voting for ObamaCare, initially, by Gov Otter and his insurance cronies. It matters what the majority of voters think today, NOW, after seeing all the dismal results of ObamaCare at the national level, and the BLM land grab fiasco in Nevada last month.

Also, RomneyCare just went belly up in Taxachussets.  Another RINO who pushed for ObamaCare.  ObamaCare totally failed in Maryland and Oregon. The FBI is investigating the Oregon health care failure, which lost millions of dollars.  Same for many other states who can't spell "free market" for health care, education, or any other market commodity.  Current high health care costs are not due to a free market.  They are due to previous presidents' Lyndon Johnson and George Bush governmental interference into the health care market.

When Otter says as Governor, one must face "reality" -- he said it over and over -- he was claiming that he must cave to the "reality" of Washington DC. Namely, the presumed power of the federal government. This is how all national dictators gain power: they obtain the sanction of their victims. Obama gained the sanction of Gov Otter.  Gov Otter has thus made Idaho a "victim" and has, acquiesced to federal power. That's how the victims turn into supporters of their own oppressors, granting them power, thinking that later, some day, they will overcome their national dictators, which rarely happens. Example, Austria in the 1930s, was tricked by the Third Reich into becoming a victim in order to receive "free" education, "free" health care, and voted 98% to become part of Hitler's German Regime.  Then Adolph lowered the boom and the victims who sanctioned their own chains found out, too late. Fast forward to Idaho and Gov Otter. History repeats itself.  Welcome to Atlas Shrugged.

All in all, the left Liberal Idaho Statesman and the left Liberal panelists asking the questions won the Governor's debate in that they got to host a GOP RINO circus on Idaho Public TV that was probably picked up by national news syndicates. Left Liberal House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi probably tuned in and had her first orgasm. But, I also think that Idaho's Senator Fulcher gained a lot of credibility because he stuck to his points and was the most "normal" person in the debate. Fulcher has a very good chance of winning the Governorship and then everybody will forget about the two loonies that Gov Otter foisted upon the IPTV debates.

--  Sun May 11, 2014  If you haven't been paying attention to politics over the last five years, the Obama Administration has committed a whole host of unlawful actions against the American people, all on the premise that those in power know what's best for everybody else.  Senator Ted Cruz and others have listed some 75 or so violations of the law, among them being Obama's taking over of General Motors, stripping the original investors of their stock holdings, and giving the proceeds to the United Auto Workers Union (the UAW), implementing an unlawful act to force Americans to purchase an economic commodity whether they want to or not, namely nationalized health care, running guns and ammo to the wrong terrorists in Libya and covering up a murderous attack against our Libyan Embassy when attempting to buy back the weapons, blaming the attack on a ridiculous Youtube movie by some Hollywood loonie which has since been disproved as the cause of the Libyan terrorist attack, allowing and encouraging the IRS to selectively target Conservative political groups -- and not one Democratic group -- who tried to qualify for tax exempt status, the President claiming he was born in the US and thus qualifies to be a US President when all evidence points to the opposite with witnesses dying left and right, and the list goes on and on ad infinitum.  In fact, that is part of the Obama national socialist policy to completely usurp the US Constitution and drag the entire United States into a socialist political culture in keeping with all the Marxist and state collectivist claptrap that he was taught by his parents and educational mentors throughout his life.  That the American Democrats, US left Liberals and European socialists -- and perhaps, depending on whether German translations are correct, even the Plejaren and/or their followers in the Billy Meier movement -- have not been able to see, to easily predict, what is obvious to even the most casual Libertarian or Tea Party American, is extremely distressing since they are walking right into the typical trap set by the altruistic state collectivists past and present  (among which include past tyrants such as Mussolini, Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Chavez, and Castro to mention just a few) and now our current wanna-be tyrants, such as Barack Obama and former Sec of State Hillary Clinton.  What is preventing the above-mentioned categories of social political economic observers from extrapolating that which philosophers such as Ayn Rand explicitly made crystal clear?  Why can't they see where the current actions of the Obama Administration -- or the beginning actions of historical state collectivists -- will inexorably lead to?  Left Liberals and socialists in the US and Europe as well as individuals in most other nations on Earth have a lame excuse:  they are not thinking logically and only think in terms of disconnected thought globs instead of logically-related concepts.  State collectivisms are so illogical they must re-think every single action as if those actions were new or do not fall into previously thought-out concepts long ago disproved.  Thus, nothing makes sense to them and they have to re-invent their conceptual "wheels" for every social political and economic act.  Most of the time they get it wrong and obviously cannot or do not connect the conceptual dots.  Adding to this, the left Liberal socialists think that everything is relative, malleable, and not an objective absolute.  To them, there are no universal laws, in physics or political economy.  Black can be white, a train can be a cup, water can be sand, depending on the moment, thus violating the basic universal law of identity.  Extrapolating to social political economics, robbery can now be a simple "redistribution" of wealth.  National health care forced down everybody's throats -- a violation of individual rights -- becomes an OK economic policy.  Once these immoral outrages become commonplace law, all truths can be thrown out the window.  Robbery, murder, and looting by the government become the law.  The law becomes opposite of the truth.  The concept that all individuals are born with rights to their own bodies, minds, and souls gets thrown out the moral philosophical window as the "rights of the recipient" of robberies, murders, and looting by the government become accepted and sanctioned by the victims themselves.  All based upon who can "prove" they are the most "needy."  Witness how Americans continue to vote for those politicians who abuse their rights.  And that is exactly where we are on planet Earth today:  the altruistic state collectivists in all nations have now obtained the sanction of their victims.  Even those in the universe who claim that all individuals have a right to choose their own non-conflicting actions and must be responsible for their own acts, have apparently fallen for the state collectivist claptrap on Earth.  At least, until they jump onto a chronin time flow and travel to the "future" to see the results of that which is happening today.  It is not difficult to predict the future outcome of America and the world at large if the current moral philosophical trend of state collectivism does not change.  And one does not have to time travel to "predict" it.  In fact, if one can only "predict" the future through time travel, rather than extrapolating conceptually, then one must not be able to understand how current concepts lead to future events.  There is, after all, a big difference in extrapolating how action A leads to action B leads to action C, and having to jump to the future through physics to find out.  Which means one is still not able to figure out the "how" and "why" a particular "future" will happen.  Which means further that one is doomed to repeat one's inability to extrapolate conceptually and thus will fall into the same, in this case, state collectivist claptrap.  Not being able to predict that the state collectivist actions of the Third Reich, for example, must inexorably lead to The Holocaust is no different than the inability to predict that the state collectivist actions of the Obama Administration must lead to a similar outcome: a probable civil war in the US and WW III.  Wake up people.  History is about to repeat itself... and for the very same reasons.

--  Fri  May 02, 2014  Ah ha!  So now we have the smoking gun connecting the dots between the White House -- President Obama himself and his Oval Office thugs -- and the terrorist attack in Benghazi in which our Libyan ambassador and 3 Americans were killed on 9/11/2012.  That is, it has now been revealed that everybody in the White House, including President Obama, knew that the attack on our Benghazi consulate was NOT due to some ridiculous Youtube video on the Internet -- as Obama and his cohorts had all been claiming for months and months after it was already disproven -- but rather the Behghazi fiasco was a pre-planned terrorist attack against our embassy.  In an email by one of Obama's inner circle staff members, the author, Ben Rhodes, stated that talking points for Susan Rice's appearance on five major TV media talk shows should stress that the Benghazi attack was not due to the President's foreign political policies but rather due to what everybody already knew was not true:  the infamous Youtube video making fun of Mohammad.  Copied on the receipt of this smoking gun email was one of Sec of State Hillary Clinton's minions.  Therefore, Hilly knew about the cover-up, too.  Even the CIA, who said they provided the "talking points" from their people working at CIA headquarters in Langley, VA, instead of relying on CIA field reports at the scene of the crime, claim that they did not know about any Youtube video being the cause of the Benghazi attack.  Looks like a lot of people at the White House and State Department have been lying their butts off and need to get their fairytales in synch.  So now that the US House Committee investigating the Benghazi debacle had to obtain this email info from a third party journalist who had to obtain it from a court order invoking the Freedom of Information Act -- instead of it being voluntarily sent to the House two years ago when Chairman Issa asked the White House for all Benghazi information, where do we go from here?  One thing is for sure:  Obama's US Attorney General, Eric Holder, is not going to bring charges against members of the White House since he's already up to his eyeballs in a dozen other obstruction of justice issues involving the White House.  Nobody's going to investigate themselves.  The only avenue left open is for the US Congress to set up a bipartisan committee to investigate Obama and his Brown Shirt thugs running rampant all over the White House, implementing programs that socialist and communist dictators in other countries could only dream they had the power to implement.  And which RINOs in Congress are going to have the cajones to set up such a committee?  Republican House Leader John Boehner?  Any Democrats?  We shall see.  But now we at least know the truth:  it has finally been outted.  Obama and Hillary appear to have an unholy alliance about what the Benghazi terrorist attack was really all about:  namely, another one of Obama's "Fast and Furious" gun running deals (like with the Mexican drug cartels) that went haywire -- providing arms and ammo to the Mid-East terrorists -- and about which neither Obama nor Hillary can comment or tell the truth without incriminating themselves.  And these are the political a$$holes running our country.  Make that RUINing our country.  There is no difference between Germany's Third Reich in the 1930s and today's Obama government.  If nothing changes, we can expect the same results as in the Third Reich.

--  Thur Apr 24, 2014  Those Conservatives -- Glenn Beck, Krauthammer, and O'Reilly -- and others who are now attacking Rancher Cliven Bundy for his First Amendment right to say what he believes about various ethnic groups should take a giant step back and answer the following ad hominem debating ruse usually uttered by junior debaters in high school:  can a prostitute be a witness to a murder?  In other words, the fact that Bundy is not an intellectual academic with a Phd in the English language does not lessen the fact that the federal government has overstepped its bounds in attacking Bundy's ranch, killing his cattle, and attempting to usurp land in Nevada through nefarious court methodologies.  If we want to judge people by their statements, then President Obama and most of the politicians in Washington DC should be strung up by their gonads for uttering all of their pro-NAZI -- national socialist -- statements.  The difference between Bundy and, say, President Obama, is that Bundy is not trying to shove blacks into slavery, but Obama is unquestionably trying to shove all of America into economic slavery of the worst possible kind:  altruistic state collectivism under which millions of individuals have literally been slaughtered throughout the last 100 years.  The real issue in the Bundy case still stands:  the federal government vs. the individual.  And, by the way, the answer is yes, a prostitute can be a witness to a murder.  A witness or victim's lifestyle does not mean they are physically blind.  Same for Bundy.  Wake up Glenn Beck, Krauthammer, and O'Reilly.  Time for you to go back to Moral Philosophy & Basic Logic 101A.

--  Wed Apr 16, 2014  In a move lawmakers and farmers are calling “the biggest land grab in the history of the world,” the Environmental Protection Agency is requesting jurisdiction over all public and private streams in the United States that are “intermittent, seasonal and rain-dependent.”

The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in late March jointly released a proposed rule, Waters of the United States, in an effort to clarify which streams and wetlands are protected under the Clean Water Act.

A statement issued by the EPA says “the proposed rule will benefit businesses by increasing efficiency in determining coverage of the Clean Water Act.”

But some lawmakers strongly disagree.

According to congressional budget testimony last week, Waters of the United States would give the EPA authority over streams on private property even when the water beds have been dry, in some cases for hundreds of years.

Calling it “the biggest land grab in the history of the world,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky., said the “economic impact of that would be profound.”

“A community needing to build on private land that had on it one of these so-called streams that you considered a waterway under the new rule would have to travel thousands, hundreds of miles to D.C., to get approval,” Rogers said.

The congressman argued it “would absolutely freeze economic activity in this country.”

Rogers said the proposal is “proof in and of itself of the mal-intent of this administration toward the private sector.”

After what we've seen the federal government's BLM try to do to Rancher Bundy last week in Clark County, Nevada, and the fact that Nevada's Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid used 200 secret service agents to rustle Bundy's cattle and take so-called BLM land for his own commercial profits (selling said land to a Chinese solar company), why should we trust that the EPA in collusion with other US Congressmen will not attempt to do the same thing if they control all the land in the nation by redefining water rights?  The last thing we need in America is an extension of any government agency's power over our individual and private property rights.  The EPA, BLM, IRS, Fed Reserve (a private banking consortium) and all the other thugster agencies need to be abolished, not extended.

--  Mon Apr 14, 2014  It's been one day after the BLM and 200 secret service agents called it quits rustling Rancher Bundy's cattle in Nevada and left the scene of their (the BLM's) crime.  How many major news media have covered the real reason why the BLM raided Bundy's Ranch?  A big fat zero.  As suspected, the major TV news media are pretending that they do not know that this entire debacle is all about Senator Harry Reid and his son's attempted land grab to sell the property to the Chinese government to develop a $5 billion solar energy project.  So much for ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and FOX News.  Let's see how long it takes them to pick up the real facts of this story... if they ever do.

--  Sun Apr 13, 2014  After lying about reaching their goal of 7 million people signing up for ObamaCare by March 31, 2014, Health and Human Services Director Kathleen Sebelius resigned from her position.  What's this all about?  All part of Obama's script.  Since, in reality, Ms. Sebelius failed miserably on ALL FRONTS of the implementation of ObamaCare, schedule-wise, financially, and you-name-it, the Obama Administration first had to claim victory and then get her out of her HHS position immediately after so they could continue their phony victory lap.  But it's not over.  Everybody and their brother knows that ObamaCare did not reach its goals, it is still a bankrupt system that is depriving millions of citizens of their previous health care policies and doctors, and it will eventually be overturned either by future legislation or by the market itself.  National socialist health care systems are not financially feasible, they are a violation of individual rights, and must by definition turn into either bankrupt health rationing systems or simply go bankrupt.  We are now living in Orwell's 1984 with Washington politicians spewing out nothing but lies lies and more lies.

--  Sun Apr 13, 2014  News Flash!!  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tried to grab a Nevada cattle rancher's leased land so Reid can build a $5 billion Chinese solar project after selling said land to the Chinese.  Hey, what's a hoppenink here?  Over the past several days, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and 200 secret service agents armed with high powered sniper rifles and automatic weapons descended upon cattle rancher Bundy and told him to get himself and his cattle off the BLM's land.  Why?  Ostensibly, to save the desert tortoises.  But the desert tortoises were moved from this land to a compound in Nevada years ago and are now actually being killed by the government because they ran out of budget money.  So much for this fake "endangered species."  Fake reason # 2:  Rancher Bundy's cattle may wander onto nearby roads and are, therefore, a hazard to the public, said the government.  Really?  One stray cow may have been struck by a car over the last 20 years.  Wow and whoop-tee-doo.  Open grazing land near roads and highways are common all over the West and warning signs are posted.  Fake reason # 3:  the land belongs to the BLM.  Buzz.  Wrong.  The grazing land in question belongs to Nevada, not the federal government.  Rancher Bundy's family has been farming watermelons and grazing cattle on this land since the 1800's.  Bundy refused to pay the BLM increased grazing fees back in 1994, claiming they had no right to implement those fees on state-leased property.  The feds did nothing for 20 years.  Now, all of a sudden, out of the clear blue sky, the BLM and 200 secret service agents descended on Bundy's grazing land and started swiping his cattle and tazing his sons and daughter and anybody else who got in the way.  Then, dum da dum...  the public finds out about this whacko attack against Rancher Bundy and a coupla thousand armed cowboys and militia from other states descended upon the scene to stand up for Bundy.  Cowboys out-rustled the federal BLM cattle rustlers and hauled Bundy's cattle back to his ranch.  Traffic was stopped and blockaded on Interstate-15.  This entire hullabaloo soon went viral on the Internet and independent news journalists started researching what's a hoppenink down at the Bundy Ranch.  As in, why is the BLM attacking some poor rancher and trying to take his land using phony excuses?  After about 5 nanoseconds of simple research, Internet journalists discovered that Senator Harry Reid and his attorney son have been working behind the scenes for several years to buy -- at dirt cheap prices -- Bundy's cattle grazing land and sell it for a tidy profit to a Chinese government energy company that the Reids have been setting up -- via federal legislation -- to build a $5 billion solar project.  To this end, the Reids have already talked the states of Nevada and Idaho into building a federal Transmission line from Idaho Falls, Idaho and through Nevada to -- ostensibly -- run the power from the Chinese solar project IF IT IS SUCCESSFUL.  So here's the upshot:  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his son have allegedly tried to pull off a land grab in Nevada in order to sell state land to a Chinese solar company to make a profit by selling the Chinese some grazing land.  Yesterday, after a standoff between armed BLM secret service thugs and armed cowboys from other states, the feds called it quits and pulled out.  The real reason, however, is that Sen. Harry Reid got caught with his fraudulent pants down, found out the news media was all over this scam, and no doubt President Obama weighed in and told him to cool it, dude.  Now it remains to be seen whether any of the major news networks will continue their investigation and bring it to the attention of the judicial system.  Will anything happen to Senator Reid of Nevada?  Time will tell but I wouldn't bet on it.

--  Tue Apr 01, 2014  Hallelujah!  Just as the last day to sign up for ObamaCare in 2014 occurred yesterday at 11:59 pm midnight, President Obama and his National Socialist Administration announced that they have reached their goal of signing up 7.1 million people in their socialist health care system!  What a coincidence. They amazingly reached their goal of 7 million sign-ups for ObamaCare.  Who'd 'a ever thunk it, especially after failing to reach their milestones every single month since Oct 2013?  Wow.  What a last minute surge.  But... there remain a zillion questions concerning the numbers such as what constitutes "people who have signed up" or "people who have actually paid for it" or "people who are new enrollees" or... ?  In short, we believe the government simply decided to redefine the stats and lied about how many people have actually signed up for ObamaCare.  All of these real or faked numbers are immaterial anyway since the real issue is individual rights vs. government mandates, individual rights vs. The Omnipotent State.  It doesn't matter how many millions did or did not sign up for ObamaCare.  Your personal health care is a private free market issue between you and your doctor.  It is no different than your right to choose what car to buy or not to buy a car at all.  Health care is just another commodity in the market over which you, as an individual, should have total control vis a vis an exchange with your choice of health care professionals.  Health care is not an individual right; education is not an individual right; having the government provide you with a car or a computer or a home or any other commodity is not an individual right.  Rights are not commodities.  Rights are freedoms that you are born with.  Rights are universal and are not obtained from a government or a piece of paper.  Those individuals, such as Republicans or Conservatives or Tea Partiers, etc., who are busy arguing against ObamaCare based upon real or imagined statistical data instead of as a violation of individual rights will lose this debate because their Democratic state collectivist opponents will simply use statistics to lie and then claim victory.  Which is exactly what just happened yesterday.  Today, or soon, President Obama will probably show up on national TV and lie to the public that his administration has reached their numerical goal of signing up 7 million people for his socialist health care system and, thus, claim that his program is right on schedule to save everybody from polio, cancer, and stubbing their collective big toe on the way to their local pub.

--  Fri Mar 28, 2014  In the No-Honor-Among-Thieves Dept, over ten bankers/traders coincidentally died within the last several months.  My, my, how mysterious.  According to Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge News, 5 guys allegedly committed suicide, 2 guys fell from JP Morgan rooftops (one in London, one in Hong clumsy of them), one guy jumped in front of a train, and one guy shot his own ass deader 'n a door nail with a nail gun.  The rest of the deaths are categorized as, "We don't know, investigation pending."  Meanwhile, central banking bankers in JP Morgan, B of A, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and others have been ordered to pay fines of over $100 Billion while still making profits of over $76 Billion last year.  Yippee and yahoo, printing up unlimited supplies of dollars, yen, pounds, and plastic cards still pays well.  And Americans are now over $17 trillion in debt to, hmm, let's see now, oh yeah, their own silly little selves for allowing Congress to allow the central bankers to hyper-inflate our currency and call it a National Debt.  Looks like the bankers are either knocking each other off in a Gangsta Banksta War or those working in the financial districts happen to be really really clumsy walking around on the roofs of buildings, waiting for trains, handling nail guns, and playing with their kids' jump ropes.  So far, the following bankster/traders have kicked the bucket.  Our condolences:

1 - William Broeksmit, 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG, was found dead in his home after an apparent suicide in South Kensington in central London, on January 26th.

2 - Karl Slym, 51 year old Tata Motors managing director Karl Slym, was found dead on the fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok on January 27th.

3 - Gabriel Magee, a 39-year-old JP Morgan employee, died after falling from the roof of the JP Morgan European headquarters in London on January 27th.

4 - Mike Dueker, 50-year-old chief economist of a US investment bank was found dead close to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State.

5 - Richard Talley, the 57 year old founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colorado, was found dead earlier this month after apparently shooting himself with a nail gun.

6 - Tim Dickenson, a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, also died last month, however the circumstances surrounding his death are still unknown.

7 - Ryan Henry Crane, a 37 year old executive at JP Morgan died in an alleged suicide just a few weeks ago. No details have been released about his death aside from this small obituary announcement at the Stamford Daily Voice.

8 - Li Junjie, 33-year-old banker in Hong Kong jumped from the JP Morgan HQ in Hong Kong this week.

9 - James Stuart Jr, Former National Bank of Commerce CEO, found dead in Scottsdale, Ariz., the morning of Feb. 19. A family spokesman did not say what caused the death

10 - Edmund (Eddie) Reilly, 47, a trader at Midtown’s Vertical Group, committed suicide by jumping in front of LIRR train

--  Fri Mar 14, 2014  Quote from the former Premier of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Klaus:  "The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.  It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.  The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America.  Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.  The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool.  It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."

-- Wed Mar 05, 2014  Ex IRS official Lois Lerner wrote in an email, "Tea Party cases are very dangerous," in regard to granting them tax exemptions such as a 501 (c) (4) for their political group.  However, at a special Congressional committee today in which Chairman Issa asked Ms. Lerner what she meant by her email statement, Ms. Lerner exercised her Fifth Amendment rights and refused to answer on the grounds that it may incriminate her.  She stood on the Fifth on several questions before Chairman Issa finally called the meeting to a close.  Ms. Lerner, the day before, wanted immunity in order to testify but she was not granted immunity because nobody knows what her testimony would be in order to grant her immunity.  The bigger question is:  if she did nothing illegal, for what reason would she request immunity?  Immunity is usually for those who are admitting guilt but are making a deal to squeal on others in exchange for that immunity.  Just what does Ms. Lerner want immunity for?  Further, how can her answering questions about her emails be incriminating unless she did something illegal?  Looks like somebody in the Obama Administration got to Ms. Lerner in the last two days and either threatened the crap out of her or bought her off with some Xmas presents... or both.  At any rate, something stinks to high Heaven in Washington DC, once again, vis a vis the IRS selectively targeting Conservative political groups in their granting of IRS tax exemptions.  Get this:  no Democratic political groups were denied IRS tax exemptions during the Obama Administration.  Somebody lower in the IRS food chain than Ms. Lerner needs to come forth and blow the whistle on this entire stinking matter.  We suspect it leads directly to the White House and their attempts to thwart all Conservative political groups from running against Obama's left Liberal socialists who now control the government.  And people wonder why Eric Snowden who blew the whistle on the NSA gathering everybody's emails and other communications had to flee the country and then blow the whistle.  Otherwise he would probably have ended up in jail or dead. Or both.  Welcome to the beginnings of Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany.  That's how they did it; and now that's how the Progressives in the US are doing it:  taking over the entire nation with force and fraud.

--  Sat Mar 01, 2014  Guess how many citizens in the great state of Oregon have signed up for ObamaCare?  Zero.  Why?  The geniuses in left Liberal Oregon volunteered to implement ObamaCare as its own ObamaCare project in a new state health care exchange.  So Oregon has spent millions and millions of dollars on computer software for their state ObamaCare system that, oops, doesn't work.  If you live in Oregon, which of Obama's Executive Orders are you, or your business, adhering to in order to fulfill the mandates of the Affordable Care Act, i.e. ObamaCare?  Do you follow the original mandates in the ACA law passed by Congress or the 28 Executive Order changes unilaterally made by President Obama (illegally) without the vote of Congress.  Executive Orders are meant to clarify the verbiage of existing law, not to re-write the mandates of existing law.  And Idaho is not far behind Oregon.  Idaho's voluntary state health care exchange is a total bust, too, with hundreds of thousands of Idahoans losing their current health care policies, their doctors, and being encouraged to sign up for state Medicaid.  Unfortunately, there is not enough money in all the pockets of all the citizens of Idaho to pay for the extrapolated increase in taxes to cover this new Medicaid cost.  Thank you, Gov Butch Otter, for shoving ObamaCare down the throats of Idaho's citizens.  Hopefully, you will not be serving a 3rd term for your RINO cohorts in Idaho after the Elections of 2014.

--  Tue Feb 18, 2014  As we have stated numerous times, President Barack Obama is now moving into the 2nd level of the standard state collectivist personality trait:  the blame game.  The 1st level was proposing state collectivist economic programs such as national socialist health care, government automobiles, or federal lollipops for everybody.  The 2nd level consists of the dictator, Obama in this case, blaming everybody except oneself when his/her socialism fails.  So what is the Obama administration doing now?  They're using the IRS to force businesses to sign a document stating whether businesses laid off people because of budget cuts due to ObamaCare.  Think about that for a moment.  By what right does the Internal Revenue Service force businesses to state why said business may have cut employee expenses or any other reason, whether for higher health care costs, higher production costs, or any other expense?  And then make it criminal if a business says "Oh yeah, I chopped 10 employees because I couldn't pay their health care costs."  We just can't wait for level 3 of Obama's dictatorial personality trait:  "OK, all you guys who are guilty of not trying hard enough to implement ObamaCare line up for the train to your re-education center in Arizona where we will show you how to sacrifice yourself for the good of the majority."  Oh, and this is immediately after President Obama stated in his interview with Bill O'Reilly of FOX TV, "Oh no, Bill, the IRS was not involved in targeting Conservative political groups to prevent them from obtaining 501 (c) (4) exemptions, not even a SMIDGEON."  Uh huh.  And not even one Democratic political group was turned down or harassed by the IRS.  Not one.

--  Mon Feb 17, 2014  In the Water Drought Hypocrisy Dept, Obama golfs at water-guzzling desert golf courses while preaching about the California drought.  According to Patriot Update, "After preaching shared sacrifice [FM Duck Note: key word for state collectivists:  shared sacrifice] to assuage the California water shortage, Obama has played some of the country’s thirstiest golf courses.  President Barack Obama traveled to California Friday to highlight the state’s drought emergency at two events near Fresno, calling for shared sacrifice to help manage the state’s worst water-shortage in decades. He then spent the rest of the weekend enjoying the hospitality of some of the state’s top water hogs: desert golf courses.  Vacationing with DVDs of his favorite television shows and multiple golf outings with his buddies, the duffer-in-chief played at two of the most exclusive courses in the Palm Springs area. On Saturday, Obama played at the Sunnylands estate, built by the late billionaire Walter Annenberg, which features a nine-hole course that is played like 18 holes. The following day he golfed at billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison’s 19-hole Porcupine Creek. On Presidents’ Day, Obama hit the links at Sunnylands once again.  The 124 golf courses in the Coachella Valley consume roughly 17 percent of all water there, and one quarter of the water pumped out of the region’s at-risk groundwater aquifer, according to the Coachella Valley Water District. Statewide, roughly one percent of water goes to keep golf courses green. Each of the 124 Coachella Valley courses, on average, uses nearly 1 million gallons a day due to the hot and dry climate, 3-4 times more water per day than the average American golf course."  Water shortage, right?  Not over-population?

--  Sun Feb 16, 2014  President Barack Obama and his Progressive Boot Lickers are now calling for the IRS to slap down all the Tea Party, Republican, Libertarian, and Conservative political groups who are running ads against ObamaCare for the 2014 Elections.  Democrats who voted YES for ObamaCare are now running for the exits and don't know what to do to convince voters that ObamaCare is not a failure as some 6.5 million Americans have now lost their health insurance and doctors.  Calling for the IRS to save their little state collectivist butts only one week after Obama was interviewed before the Super Bowl Game, Obama stated that not only was the IRS not involved in harassing Conservative political groups over the last two years but that there was not even a "smidgeon" of involvement by the IRS.  Ya-yesssss, not even a "smidgeon."  Uh-huh.  One week later on national TV, Senator Schumer called for the IRS to target Conservatives to stop them from running campaign ads against the failure of ObamaCare.  Schumer wins the Cheshire Cat Big Fake Grin Award for 2014, surpassing Vice President Joe Biden and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi in 2013.  "Huyuck, I guess we'll just have to read the 3,000 pages of ObamaCare to find out what's in it, huyuck, giggle, snort," said Pelosi, as she spread more lipstick on her big fat Pinocchio nose.

--  Thur Jan 30, 2014  President Obama lied through his pearly white teeth in his State of the Union speech.


Lie # 1:  The Obama administration has created over 8 million new jobs over the last 4 years...  yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic socialists in the audience... but, oops, not true.  Since the start of Obama's dictatorship, only 3.2 million jobs have been created, many of them PART TIME GOVERNMENT JOBS, and the US still has 1.2 million fewer jobs than in 2007.


Lie # 2:  Obama said, "Today, women make up about one-half of America's work force, but they only make 77-cents for every dollar that a man earns.  That is wrong, and in 2014, it is an embarrassment."  ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic socialists in the audience...  Really?  77-cents?  Buzz, wrong, you lied, not true, Mr. President.  Obama is using figures from the Census Bureau and comparing apples with oranges regarding types of jobs.  In some jobs, paid hourly, women make 14-cents to 19-cents less than men while in other jobs, salaried management, women earn just as much or millions more than men.  Salary is not the only comparison for total compensation; women receive maternity leave that men do not.  Many women want to raise children; they do not want a CEO position, and on and on.  Obama is pretending that women are being frozen out of good jobs in the work place and that is simply not true.


Lie # 3:  Obama's shameless inflation of the ObamaCare enrollment numbers.  He said, "More than nine million Americans have signed up for private health insurance or Medicaid coverage," implying that these numbers are the result of his Affordable Health Care program.  ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic socialists in the audience...  6.3 million of the Medicaid numbers are HIGHLY questionable, earning a rating of 3 lying Pinocchios from industry sources.  And 3 million of the private insurance members from ObamaCare statistics are absolutely false.  ObamaCare stats counts the number of people who logged onto the ACA system, NOT the number of people who successfully obtained health care and paid their first premium.  How do we know this?  Because the software for the insurance payment has not been written yet.  In reality, if you haven't finished enrolling or even made a payment, you are not insured.  The fact is, over 6 million people have LOST their current health insurance due to ObamaCare and the new rules his program has imposed upon America.  ObamaCare has actually gone backwards, accomplishing exactly the opposite of its socialist goals?  Wow, where have we seen that before?  Not only that, but software consultant after software consultant has testified to Congress that the ObamaCare computer system is not safe, is hackable by identity thieves, and has, in fact, already been hacked.  Yet, President Obama was pretending in his State of the Union speech that ObamaCare is a raging success while the facts show that it is a resounding failure.  Plus, it cost the American taxpayer over $680 million, almost $600 million more than the original estimate, and it ain't over yet, folks.  The Obama administration just issued another $90 million software contract to a new group to try to save the current failure.


Meanwhile, Human & Health Services Director Kathleen Sebelius sat there during Obama's SOTU speech and received a standing ovation from the Democratic socialists for the lies being told about her system.  She should be fired immediately and President Obama should be impeached for lying to the American people and illegally changing the ACA mandates (i.e. legislation passed by Congress) with Executive Orders that violate his limited statutory authority granted in the US Constitution.


So much for all the imperial pomp and circumstance at President Obama's latest State of the Union pack of lies.


--  Wed Jan 29, 2014  Ah yes, the President's State of The Union address last night.  What did he tell us?  Both overtly and between the lines?  Overtly President Obama aggressively put forth his ideology of Marxist socialism.  As predicted, he has now passed the point of insinuating the implementation of his socialist principles by using mamby-pamby words such as "hope and change" and "fundamentally change America."  Now that his socialist programs have failed, the economy is approaching ruins, people have lost their jobs, lost their health insurance, and the wars in the Middle East are still raging, President Obama -- like all previous socialist dictators before him in every nation -- is now openly displaying his anger.  He now says he is not going to work with the US Congress to do anything.  He is going to sign off on dictatorial Executive Orders to bypass the checks and balances of the US Constitution.  He is the President of "No Authority."  It is not the number of EOs that he is issuing that's the major problem; it is the substantive depth of the changes that the EOs are intended to bring about.  Total dictatorial authority.  There is no statutory authority for President Obama to use an EO to change the legislative mandates of, for example, ObamaCare.  EOs are meant to clarify and expedite existing legislation, not re-write the legislative mandates.  Mr. Obama is now going through the same process that all wanna-be state collectivists go through when they see that the people are rejecting their government programs:  bullying, threatening, and openly waging an all-out war against the very people he is screwing over, ironically, in the name of the very people he is screwing over.  In this 2nd Marxist stage of How Dictators Take Over Nations, Obama is following in the footsteps of Stalin, Lenin, Adolph Hitler, Mussolini, Mao-Tse-Tung, Fidel Castro, Idi Amin, and Genghis Kahn.  He knows what's right.  He knows what should be done.  He knows that if only he could play Total Dictator, dump Congress and dump the Supreme Court, he could save everybody from all the evils in the world.  But the people and Congress will not cooperate.  They refuse to buy health insurance through ObamaCare.  Nor should they because this $680 million government program doesn't work, puts personal information at risk to hackers, and, most importantly, restricts all individuals' freedoms to choose their own doctors and health insurance policies.  Millions have lost their health insurance due to ObamaCare.  But Obama lies about ObamaCare's failure.  The people, he claims, don't know what's good for them.  Only he knows.  And he knows so much about economics, he thinks, that he can't understand why the dirty rotten people and his political opponents don't just divvy up all the money in the world, create work communes, and distribute the wealth equally among everybody.  Well, almost everybody.  Not himself or the other Rulers in his dictatorship.  They get more cookies than everybody else because they're in charge.  Obama and his cronies are so brilliant and they have to manage all the trillions and trillions of market exchanges, buys and sells at the government-approved "correct" prices in the not-so-free market so that everything works like the well-oiled-machine that they know Marxist socialism will create.  Uh huh.  Right.  Screw the consumers.  What do they know?  Screw the free market; it's not fair, said Karl Marx.  Obama still believes in the outdated "Labor Theory of Value."  Even socialist economists -- an oxymoron -- don't believe in the "Labor Theory of Value" any longer, and yet every economic sophism Obama puts forth rests in part on this false axiom.  In the 3rd stage of How to Implement Socialism, when the communes and redistribution of all the money in America doesn't work, somebody must be at fault and they will have to pay.  With their lives.  First, by loss of freedoms.  Then by incarceration and finally by extermination.  The Marxist path is well-known.  Those who still don't understand the ideology that President Obama is following will soon discover that they have made a grave mistake.  But, unless Obama and his ideas are curbed, it will be too late.  The USSR, the People's Republic of China, Socialist Cuba, and now Obama's "Fundamentally Changing of America" with "I got a pen and a phone" to bypass Congress and issue a thousand illegal EOs.  Obama's SOTU speech last night is an open war against the individual, against, the rule of law, against the US Constitution, and against the concepts embedded in the inherent rights of man.  Last night, President Obama openly declared war against America, against YOU, and he has told you his game plan.  Wake up, people!


--  Fri Jan 17, 2014  "I've got a pen and I've got a phone," said President Barack Obama.  Remember how FM Duck told its readers the major steps that most Dictators take on their Marxist tromp towards implementing state collectivism?  Step One:  The would-be Dictator, e.g., Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Mao Tse-Tung, and Barack Obama, for example, reveal how they have solved every problem in the world by reading Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto.  Step Two:  The would-be Dictator passes legislation or beats people to death to implement, for example, a national socialist health care system to save everybody from every sickness in the world.  Step Three:  The would-be Dictator's national health care plan crashes and burns and brings about the exact opposite of its proposed results.  Step Four:  The would-be Dictator claims his national socialist health care system was/is being undermined by his enemies and everybody else.  This is where the US is currently at in 2014 with President Obama's failed ObamaCare system.  Step Five:  The would-be Dictator issues proclamations to FORCE his national health care system down everybody's throats under penalty of incarceration.  Referring to the US Congress which Obama considers irrelevant, Obama is now ready to go around Congress by issuing Executive Orders (his illegal socialist proclamations) and calling his enforcers on the phone to implement his dictatorial proclamations.  Step Six:  Those who fail to "voluntarily" participate in the would-be Dictator's national socialist health care system will be fined, taxed, shipped to re-education camps, and eventually, exterminated for failure to make the Dictator's national socialist health care system a raging economic success.  It's the people's fault, not the would-be Dictator, he claims.  That is how it always happens and that is how Obama intends on becoming Dictator of America -- all for "good intentions" of course.  Will he succeed?  Tune in for the results of the 2014 and 2016 Elections and find out.  Yahoooooo, it's Adventure Time!  "I've got a pen and I've got a phone!"


--  Tue Jan 14, 2014  Where is the birth certificate?  Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.  Various court cases are winding their way through America's judicial system.  When they will show up, nobody knows.  Possibly as early as March 2014.  Possibly others who have knowledge about this issue will get run over by a MACK truck, fall off a building, or crash in a plane in the ocean.  But one thing is for sure:  somebody is hiding something.

--  Sat Jan 11, 2014  The Obama Administration just fired the computer contractor, CGI, who blew $680 million of taxpayer money and failed to implement Obama's system.  Now, the Barack Hussein Obama Administration is signing a new contract for $90 million with a new computer contractor to take over.  Why isn't this front page news?  Where is the left Liberal news media?  $680 million plus $90 million equals $770 million plus whatever else it has cost the government to try and implement a national socialist health care system.  Just think, all we really had to do to implement a reasonably low cost health care system is the same thing we have done to implement a reasonably low cost iPhone system, or automobile system, or shoes, or food, or any other free market commodity:  get the government out of the way of the free market and allow everybody to shop for health insurance anywhere in the world, cut the absurd medical lawsuits, and laissez-fricken-faire.  We all want inexpensive health care.  That's not the issue.  The issue is the methodology to bring it about.  The quickest method for the most people with high quality health care -- just like for every other commodity -- is through free market capitalism, not via the government.  Wake up Obama!  Wake up Liberals!  Socialists are those individuals who understand nothing about money, nothing about economics, nothing about freedom, nothing about private property rights or... the politicians understand all the above; they're just plain crooks who make their living by playing the role of redistribution brokers, redistributing the fruits of YOUR labor.  Or, let's just be nice and say Liberals are naive little 12-year olds whose educational level regarding money and economics is still at an elementary level, my dear Watson.  Meanwhile, where is Congress in approving this new $90 million that the Obama Administration is preparing to throw down another government rat hole?

--  Sat Jan 11, 2014  Liberal reasoning:  assumption, people are inherently too mean, rotten, stupid, and bad to allow them to live in freedom, i.e., free market capitalism.  Liberal solution: all the inherently mean, rotten, stupid, and bad people who are incapable of living in freedom go into a voting booth and vote for other inherently mean, rotten, stupid, and bad people (by definition, remember) to govern all the inherently mean, rotten, stupid, and bad people.  Wait a minute.  Isn't this a contradiction?  How can inherently bad people elect good government?  Are we supposed to believe that inherently bad people morph into saints by stepping into a voting booth and perform that which they were incapable of doing in freedom?  Is a voting booth some magic contraption?  Or could it be that Liberals are starting out with a false premise, using false methodology, and, therefore, bringing about a disastrous result:  namely, the creation of the very problem the Liberals presumably set out to solve?

--  Sat Jan 04, 2014  Was President Barack Obama born in the US and then pretended on US college applications that he was a foreign student born in Kenya and attended primary school in Indonesia?  Or, was President Obama actually born in Kenya and grew up in Indonesia?  If the former is true, and if American colleges Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard fell for it, then we can understand why the powers that be had to hide all of his college paperwork since they would have revealed that he applied for entrance and financial aid as a "foreign student," even though he was not.  That would constitute fraud and is a criminal offense.  He would immediately be impeached.  If on the other hand, he was actually born in Kenya, then he does not qualify to be president of the United States and would thus also qualify to be impeached.  Something has to explain why his college paperwork has been hidden from the public.  Whether it's the first reason or the second reason, he should be impeached.  If there is a third reason, namely, that he was just a regular Joe Doe American born in Hawaii, then why hide all of his university paperwork?  One does not have to be the famous Belgian detective Hercules Poirot to conclude that something stinks in Washington DC vis a vis faux president Barack Obama's curriculum vitae.

--  Sun Dec 29, 2013  You know your society is doomed:

When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion.

When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing.

When you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors.

When you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you.

When you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice.
-- Ayn Rand, 1958

--  Fri  Dec 27, 2013

How Big is a Trillion Dollars?
Dec 27, 2013

Washington, DC  –  Whoa, girl friends, gather round, shut up, and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java.  Have you ever seen a million dollars?  How about a billion dollars?  What does One Trillion dollars look like?

   All this talk about "stimulus packages" and "bailouts"... A billion dollars here... a hundred billion dollars there... Eight hundred billion dollars for President Bush’s TARP bailout... Eight hundred billion dollars for President Obama’s ARRA “stimulus package”… One TRILLION dollars...

   What does that look like?

   Let’s start with a $100 dollar bill, currently the largest U.S. denomination in general circulation.


   A packet of one hundred $100 bills is less than 1/2" thick and contains $10,000.  Fits in your pocket easily and is more than enough for a week or two of shamefully decadent fun.


   Believe it or not, this next little pile is $1 million dollars (100 packets of $10,000).  You could stuff that into a grocery bag and walk around with it.

$1,000,000 (one million dollars)

   While a measly $1 million looked a little unimpressive, $100 million is a little more respectable.  It fits neatly on a standard pallet...

$100,000,000 (one hundred million dollars)

   And $1 BILLION dollars...

$1,000,000,000 (one billion dollars)

   Next let’s look at ONE TRILLION dollars.   More...

-- Wed Dec 25, 2013  Understanding the US economy in two easy steps:

US Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000 (trillion)

Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000 (trillion)

New debt: $1,650,000,000,000 (trillion)

National debt: $14,271,000,000,000 (trillion)

Recent budget cuts: $38,500,000,000 (billion)

Let's now remove 8 zeros and pretend it's a household budget:

* Annual family income: $21,700

* Money the family spent: $38,200

* New debt on the credit card: $16,500

* Outstanding balance on credit card: $142,710

* Total budget cuts so far: $385

Got it ?

--  Sun Dec 22, 2013  President Obama has now declared that the Affordable Care Law passed by Congress is only a set of Suggested Flexible Guidelines that he can alter at will -- which he did, again, last night for the umpteenth time.  And from where does Obama claim he obtains this newly found power to alter Congressional laws?  Certainly not from Article 2, Sections 1, 2, 3, or 4 which enumerate Executive Branch powers, or from anywhere else in the US Constitution.  Obama, last night before jumping on Air Force One to play golf in Hawaii for the next 17 days over the Christmas holidays, popped up on national TV and declared his umpteenth change to Congress's Affordable Care Act:  namely, individuals whose health plans were canceled -- what are we up to now, 6 million people? -- will now automatically qualify for a “hardship exemption” from the ACA mandate. If they can’t or don’t sign up for a new plan, they don’t have to pay the penalty tax. They can also get a special category of ObamaCare insurance designed for people under age 30.  This is 2-3 times higher than people were paying before losing their existing health care plans that Obama PROMISED (but knew otherwise) they could keep under the new ACA.  Obama's latest announcement was not a surprise to the insurance companies who thought the Affordable Care Act was a real law, with mandates that, if violated, are punishable by law.  And, in fact, the insurance companies had to drop millions of health care policies over the last three years because the Affordable Care Act mandated that their insurance policies be changed in accordance with the new law.  So, we have at least two big questions:  (1) From where does Obama's Executive Branch obtain the authority to change Congress's legislative laws, and (2) which is the real Affordable Care Act law that all Americans must follow or end up being taxed, fined, sued, or end up in court?  Which suggestion or guideline that Obama issues in regard to his latest alteration of the Affordable Care Act should attorneys and judges refer to when insurance companies and individuals show up in court to adjudicate any differences of opinion?  What would the Supreme Court rule upon:  the ACA as passed by Congress, or the ACA as changed day-to-day by President Obama and his Executive Department?  By the way, you know that parking ticket you received last week for parking in the red zone in front of that fire hydrant in downtown New York?  You don't really have to pay it; it was only a suggested guideline.  Welcome to America where there are no longer any laws, only Suggested Flexible Guidelines.

--  Tue Dec 17, 2013  Referring to the Obama administration’s executive action to unilaterally allow younger illegal immigrants brought to the United States by their parents to be exempt from enforcement laws after Congress rejected the DREAM Act, Congressman Gowdy said Obama was “substituting” his judgment for Congress’s.  The Big Question is:  which other laws can the president ignore?  “If you can turn off immigration laws, if you can turn off mandatory minimums in our drug statutes, if you can turn off the so called Affordable Care Act, why not election laws?” Gowdy said. “Assume that a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president require three forms of ID? Can the president require one form of ID? Can he suspend all requirements that you show ID? And if not, why not. If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you also not have the power to turn off all categories of the law?”  And this is why many Americans are so concerned that President Obama will try to declare martial law, suspend the US Constitution, and demand that he continue to be President for an unknown further period of time.  Why not?  This is exactly what he's doing with Congress's Affordable Care Act and other pieces of legislation.  How far can he go in violating the Constitution?  When will the US Congress take action to curb President Obama's unconstitutional actions?

--  Thur Dec 05, 2013  Very few people understand the moral philosophical principles underlying President Barack Obama's motives for creating and implementing a nationalized health care system -- the Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare.  What are those principles and where did they come from?  First, President Obama believes in altruistic state collectivism, not just for health care but for every commodity and service in the market.  His dictum is:  "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."  In other words, all goods and services do not belong to those who produced them.  They belong to the "collective" and should be distributed by the government, and the basis for that distribution should be "needs-based."  Obama's view:  screw the producer, the other half of the producer-consumer exchange process.  In the field of health care, President Obama consulted the brother of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's previous Chief of Staff and now Chicago's first Jewish mayor.  [Note: now there's a contradiction in terms: a Muslim Brotherhood's President (Obama) with a Jewish Chief of Staff.  Go figure.]  Rahm Emanuel's brother is Ezekiel Emanuel, a medical doctor at the National Institute of Health (NIH) and a member of that institution's Bio Ethical Department.  Ezekiel Emanuel and other MD's published many papers such as an article in Lancet in 2009 regarding how to ethically choose which patients should receive how much, if any, of which treatment, from flu shots to organ transplants.  The moral philosophical basis for Ezekiel's so-called bio-ethical choices all rest upon the philosophical foundation of the idea that people are cogs in a state collective, with the government's function being the redistribution broker.  Which means the function of the government doctors -- along with bureaucrats -- is to ration medical services and commodities to the members of society as per their "usefulness" to the state collective.  Contrast that ideology to: individual rights to freely exchange, private property, and free market capitalism.  In the latter, goods and commodities are not rationed; voluntary market forces bring supply to demand.  And then prices drop.  In a socialist system, there are no free market prices to even determine if there is a market shortage in one of the many millions of related services or commodities that result in finished products.  Bureaucrats set fake prices using Sears Mail Order Catalogues, as they did in the USSR.  So, right off the bat, President Obama followed the ridiculous advice of a group of so-called bio-ethical medical doctors at the NIH who not only hold metaphysical, epistemological, and moral philosophical views of state collectivism -- i.e. socialism -- they co-authored papers in the medical journal Lancet that not only discusses how to ration medical care but also show charts for what former Alaskan Gov Sarah Palin called "Death Panels."  Ezekiel Emanuel's charts were called "Reaper Charts."  Why?  Because they showed the age groups -- such as before age 15 and above age 60 -- that various types of medical care should be withheld based upon various criteria such as the individual's usefulness to the state collective. The Big Question is: determined by whom?  You may not have heard about Ezekiel Emanuel's "The Complete Lives System."  It's the intellectual underpinning for Obama's Affordable Care Act, and it's frightening.  You can Google Ezekiel's articles for bio-ethics in Lancet Medical Journals.  Now let that morality sink into your brain for a minute and you will start realizing what President Barack Obama and his left Liberal administration is trying to shove down your throats with Obamacare.  Gov Palin had it correct:  Obamacare is the moral philosophical concretization of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel's state collectivist ideology and that ideology's driving force for government rationing of health care ultimately rests upon their "bio-ethical" premises underlying their "Reaper Charts" -- or "Death Panels."  This is the same ideology that led to -- not at first, but the ultimate logical conclusion -- of Adolph Hitler's national health care system that ended in The Holocaust as it's final solution.  Classes of individuals were declared "unfit" or "not useful" for the political leaders' state collectivist regime.  So they, as a class of people, like America's class of youth under age 15 or over age 60 in Ezekiel Emanuel's moral philosophy, are targets for elimination under the 2,700 pages of Obamacare legislation -- plus 20,000 pages, so far, of IRS and other bureaucratic rules.  Obamacare -- ridiculously called the Patient's Protection and Affordable Care Act -- is one of the most evil and pernicious pieces of moral philosophy ever proposed by an American President.  Plain and simple, it is simply another form of genocide couched in Hollywood marketing of the worse kind.  For doctors, Obamacare is blatantly against their Hippocratic Oath to save and protect all life.  Obama's current marketing campaign for the next 20 days before Christmas in 2013 is to try to gain the sanction of his and Ezekiel Emanuel's victims, which is you.  Your job is to vote in the Elections of 2014 and dump all those politicians -- both Liberals and RINOs -- who support Obamacare.  It's worth your life.

--  Tue Dec 03, 2013  Called "Evangelii Gaudium" (The Joy of the Gospel), Pope Francis blamed the existence of money, free market capitalism, and -- by implication -- the entire moral philosophy upon which rests the ideology of individual rights, private property rights, and the foundation of a limited republic as the CAUSE of poverty throughout the world.  Really?  What a dope the Pope is.  There are so many misconceptions and untruths underlying Pope Francis' assumptions and thus erroneous conclusions that one wonders where to start to refute them.  Let's just hit the basic basics of economics and free market philosophy.  First, money per se is not bad.  Money is simply a medium of economic exchange, taking the place of direct barter until said commodities/services can be exchanged later.  Nobody intends to eat gold money -- or a paper receipt for it -- or build a house out of it.  What Pope Francis is erroneously referring to as the result of money and capitalism is actually the result of fiat currency and the market being manipulated by the state collectivists (fascists, communists, socialists, dictators) who have gotten control of our paper and credit money supply, namely the Federal Reserve and all other national central banks in the world.  But these monetary manipulators are not free market capitalists and their manipulated money is not backed by anything.  They are counterfeiters.  Pope Francis -- like most people -- does not understand what money is and what constitutes the foundational ideas of free market economics.  So he erroneously believes the propaganda spewed out daily by government news media and thus blames the wrong group and for the wrong reasons.  In short, the Pope is rather ignorant about basic social-political-economics.  It is government intervention into the free market, going off the gold and silver standard for money, and the philosophy of Karl Marx -- from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs -- that has brought poverty to a large portion of the world.  Prices of products under true capitalism tend toward zero as capital is accumulated; "prices" under socialism tend toward infinity -- i.e. absence of goods on the shelves -- as there are no real "prices" under socialism, only government mandated math values stuck up on items or issued with ration cards.  Does capitalism get rid of all crooks?  Of course not.  But that's the only reason for government:  to protect and adjudicate law breakers.  Does socialism get rid of crooks?  Absolutely not, and, in fact, it routes the most vicious clever crooks directly into positions of government power where they are then in charge of making up the laws to protect their criminal actions.  Capitalism produces the highest quality of life for the most people than any other arrangement because it is founded upon principles of individual rights and responsibilities.  Socialism is founded upon dog-eat-dog vicious politics.  Pope Francis, in attacking free market capitalism and not defining what money really is, does himself and his global congregation a huge disservice by drawing wrong conclusions from wrong foundational assumptions.  His ideas are not defending the poor; his ideas are sending them into the very poverty he is complaining about.  Note that Pope Francis and President Obama have come to the same fallacious economic conclusions... based upon the same fallacious economic sophisms.  And hence the birth of Liberals in the US and their continued fallacious education -- from Kindergarten through University grad school -- in the Marxist philosophy of altruistic state collectivism.

--  Thur Nov 28, 2013  US Dictator-President Barack Obama has just broken the law again.  Now what?  The Affordable -- Ha Ha Affordable -- Health Care Law mandates that small businesses must start participating in ObamaCare next week.  This is the law.  It is not just a guideline passed by Congress.  It is the law, just like all the other laws passed by Congress and subject to judicial and statutory regulations.  But now, as of yesterday, Dictator-President Barack Obama has just declared that small businesses do not have to start enrolling their employees into the Affordable Ha Ha Affordable Health Care system until Nov 15, 2014, two weeks after the 2014 Elections for Congress.  What a coincidence.  And what a law-breaking action this is.  No president or US Congressman or judge can just pop up one morning and declare that certain sections or clauses of a US law can be arbitrarily changed.  This can only be done by Congress by going through its legislative procedures as outlined in the US Constitution.  That is why we have checks and balances between the three branches of government:  to prevent the dictatorial actions that Obama has just taken.  US Dictator-President Barack Obama is now embarking upon dangerously litigious territory:  unconstitutionally declaring changes in various laws, specifically his ACA Obamacare Law.  The Big Question:  will the US Congress just sit on their thumbs and pretend that US Dictator-President Barack Obama can rewrite their legislation any ol' time he feels like it?  Or will somebody in Congress finally grow a pair of cajones and call the President's on his illegal action?  By the way, some additional 50 - 100 million people may well lose their current health care insurance as ObamaCare kicks in and employers figure out that it's cheaper to not cover their employees through the ACA.  Ceteris paribus, if nothing else changes, all private insurance companies will soon go out of business and the Obama thugs will have obtained their single payer government system -- a national socialist health care system -- which was their goal in the first place.  Anybody who didn't see this coming is blind as a bat.  Like, who is John Galt?

--  Fri Nov 22, 2013  Here's the Big Question of The Day:  Did the Obama Administration cleverly and knowingly orchestrate the failure of Obamacare's roll out on purpose or are they simply as incompetent as they appear?  First, let's trek down Logic Path A that assumes Obamacare was, and is, being engineered to fail at all levels in order to reach the goal of a single payer government system:  nationalized health care.  (1) Obamacare is passed by Congress with 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook that nobody has fully read or understands.  (2)  US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts -- either acting under threats from the Obama Administration or delusions of what constitutes "Constitutionality" -- introduces the term "tax" into the Obamacare Bill in order to get around the term "fee," so he can rule (5-4) that "taxes" are constitutional, and thus Obamacare is "constitutional."  This was necessary for the next steps.  (3) The Obama Admin knowingly rolls out a flawed and incomplete Web Site for people to try to sign up for Obamacare.  5.5 million people lose their current insurance and doctors, receive notices that double/triple or quadruple the cost of a new insurance policy and/or deductibles, but cannot sign up on the Healthcare Web Site because it's broken and the payment software programs have not even been written yet.  Which means nobody can or could have signed up.  (4) President Obama pops up on national TV and illegally pulls a new change to the Obamacare Law out of his ass and declares that everybody can keep their previous insurance that the Affordable Health Care Act "legally" says they can't.  All of a sudden, nobody knows what the real law is:  the one Congress passed and the President signed off on, or the latest change that Obama ad-libbed in a rambling diatribe on national TV?  Which direction do you go?  Can you, or a company, be sued if you, or a company, choose one direction or the other?  Can the government be sued? (5)  Now that Obama has purposely dumped 5.5 million people off their current insurance policies, he and Valerie Jarrett will next watch as 50 - 100 million employees lose their insurance polices when employers discover that the costs are prohibitive and dump their insurance coverage for employees.  (6)  Now, as planned, 150 million or more individuals have either no insurance, or have extremely high insurance costs, or have now qualified for Medicare, Medicare that is now an unfunded liability to the tune of $90 trillion or more dollars.  (7)  Now that the entire health care system of the US has been completely wiped out, the Obama Administration can finally blame the insurance companies, the youth of America who chose to pay a fine rather than sign up to subsidize everybody else's health care costs, and your grandmother's dog's left ear.  (8)  Oh, what to do, what to do...  "Oh, I know," says Obama.  "We simply have to morph the Obamacare system into a single payer, national socialist government health care system.  You know, the type of system that we originally planned for and have arrived at by pretending to implement a fake market-based health care system.  Yahoo, thank you, my dear little victims!"  Welcome to Hell.  Or let's take a quick gander at the Logic for Path B, entitled, We Are Seriously Trying to Implement Good Health Care But We Are Just a Bunch of Incompetents.  (1)  Obama and the socialist Democrats pass Obamacare, not knowing what's in the 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook.  (2)  The IRS and HHS add thousands more pages of contradictory rules. (3)  The US Supreme Court says Obamacare is "constitutional."  See Chief Justice John Roberts actions above.  (4) The Obama Admin hires a bunch of computer incompetents to write the software code and implement a totally botched up Web Site that cost $680 million, 5 times or more over budget, and the payment routines have not even been written.  (5)  Obama shows up on national TV and lies again about virtually everything he can think of.  (6)  The incompetent people rolling out Obamacare, both at the techie computer level and the personal contract level, continue stumbling along seriously trying to make everything work.  Ha Ha, seriously?  (7)  Obama's ratings fall lower than whale shit at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean but he and his cohorts continue to push Obamacare down Americans' throats in a "ha ha serious" attempt to save everybody's health care.  (8)  The system continues to blow up as more and more people lose their health care insurance and the Obama Administration hopes and prays they win the 2014 Elections and the 2016 Elections to keep Obamacare floating all the way to Hell and back.  So which Path, national socialist A or faux serious B, do you think the Obama Administration is traveling?  Are they crafty little socialists who have planned the crash and burn of the current health care system AND the Affordable Care Act ON PURPOSE, or are they simply a bunch of dummies stumbling down the path to Nowheresville because they still haven't figured out that socialism doesn't work?  My guess is that Obama is traveling down Path A:  Screwing it up on purpose to arrive at a national socialist health care joke, plus traveling down Path B, namely they are Seriously a Bunch of Dummies in the first place for trying to choose any other path than free market capitalism.

--  Mon Nov 18, 2013  Whoa, pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, shut up, and listen up, girl friends.  Did the United States of America just morph from a limited republic to a dictatorship overnight?  President Obama -- a month after his ridiculous heath care Web Site rolled out and crashed over the cliff, causing 6 million people to lose their current health care coverage -- strolled out in front of national TV and said, "Oh $hee-it, man, I'm so sorry for lying to you that y'all could actually keep your original health insurance policies and doctors.  Dang, and weren't you a bunch of fools to believe my crack-snorting little ass, but ya-yesss, I take full blame -- cough-cough, make that full credit -- for fumbling your health care lives on my own 1 yard line -- 'cause that's about how far my program got (99 yards to go) before it blew sky high on Oct 1, 2013.  And now I promise, again, ha ha, fool you twice, that the football game ain't over, that I will pick up this $684 million over-budget football and run toward the 2 yard line before I fumble the ball again because this game -- and I do mean "game" -- ain't over yet.  Ya-yesss, boys and girls, my little subordinate victims, I am now declaring that I can just step up onto the national stage and claim that I have the constitutional authority to change any law I desire and thus undo those portions of Congress' Affordable Care Act that I think may be inconvenient in my Obamacare Mess, for which I take full responsibility even though it's not my fault.  Double speak, double speak.  Soooo, cough-cough, and I'm not standing here naked as a Jay bird, y'all don't have to follow the original Obamacare law passed by Congress.  Follow whatever I last say on TV.  There will be no lawsuits, I promise.  Ha ha, you dumb $hits.  You don't have to give up your health care policies for a whole year 'cause, well, because I said so.  And I'm above the law.  Which law?  All the laws.  Never mind that the original law -- which I just dumped with HARDLY ANY OBJECTIONS FROM 535 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS -- says you got until Jan 1, 2014, to comply.  Forget about that law.  I just declared a new law.  And, if I feel like it, I will override the new law tomorrow, and then that law the next day, and then the following day until Hell freezes over.  Whatever I feel like because I am the CEO of America.  And we are the Borg.  We all live in one big commune.  Congress, the US Constitution and all of our current laws are now irrelevant until I say so in one of my Executive Orders.  Left, right, left, right...  In fact, I am changing the freeway speeds in all 50 states from 65 MPH to 13 1/2 MPH as of, let's say, uh, midnight tonight, OK?  Why?  To save the Borg's fuel costs and cut down on CO2 emissions on Saturdays while we're driving to our nation's fantasy football games.  US laws are now only, well, you know, like, Temporary Guidelines.  We now have only one branch of government:  the Executive Department, better known as ME, Barack Obama."  Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for me.

--  Tue Nov 12, 2013  Howdy Idahoinians:  a whopping 100 Idahoans have signed up for Gov Butch "The RINO" Otter's state healthcare exchange.  Way to go, Butch.  We tried to tell you it was a bust and you tried to claim you were a Libertarian.  What a joke.  6 million Americans have lost their health care insurance all across the US within the last month and a half.  Less than 50,000 of the anticipated 500,000 that were expected by the Obama administration to have signed up by now have either paid for Obamacare insurance or left their shopping carts on without signing up.  7 million Americans are necessary to sign up to even fund Obamacare, which looks like it ain't gonna happen, folks.  At the current rate of signing up for O-Care, it might take a few hundred years to get rolling.  Like hello, we'll all be dead by then. R.I.P.

--  Mon Nov 11, 2013  Think about this:  The IRS, the taxing agency that has been chosen to monitor, implement and enforce our nation's new national socialist health care system with 16,000 new IRS agents, has sent over 650 income tax refunds to the same address.  This means that the programming in the IRS computer system is just as bad or worse than the computer system underlying Obamacare.  How difficult is it for the IRS programmers to write the following simple routine:  (1) sort all the IRS refund checks by address, and (2) if the current address equals the last address, flag this data item.  I mean, come on, this is simple Computer For Idiots 101A and the IRS has not implemented this type of error checking in its refund program?  So now we have to ask the question:  What sort of error checking has been implemented in the botched up Obamacare system?  None?  This system has cost the taxpayers $680 million, with an original budget estimated at $80 million.  If any private company had received an initial estimate of $80 million to create a computer system and the cost approached double, $160 million, the project would have come to a complete halt and heads would have rolled.  So what happened when the cost of Obamacare passed double and approached triple?  Nothing.  How about quadruple, $320 million?  Nothing.  How about quintuple, $400 million?  Nothing.  How about adding in the fact that the system would not be completed on time?  Nothing.  And the "project manager" and HHS Secretary Sebelius are still busy trying to "fix" whatever is wrong with their ridiculously overrun Obamacare project while Congress sits on their thumbs and says, "Oh well."  President Obama pretends everything is on schedule and it will be a great system.  Millions of citizens have already lost their current health care coverage and Obama says their health care policies were substandard and they will get better coverage under Obamacare -- if they can ever log on to sign up.  But this train wreck is just the tip of the ice berg.  Look at the IRS system, sending $4 billion to duplicate addresses.  This is the type of error checking you can expect to find in whatever the future Obamacare system ends up as, too.  And the IRS, who can't even clean up their own system, is in charge of the Obamacare system?  Just think, all we really needed to do was to dump the current health care system that the government implemented over the last 50 years, go back to the free market, and start over.  The free market is not the cause of our previous lousy health care system; but it IS the solution.  Same for the USPS, Amtrak, and all the other government bureaucracies that have intervened into the free market.  Once again, health care is not a right.  No commodities or services are rights.  Health care is a marketable commodity and if the government would get out of the way, prices would plummet, just like for all other commodities in an open market.  Obamacare doesn't need more time; it needs to be abolished. 

--  Sat Nov 02, 2013  Newsflash to all Left Liberals:  before Obamacare, the health care system operating in the US was NOT a free market system.  It was -- and has been for the last 50 years -- operating, technically speaking, in a quasi fascist economic system.  Fascism is defined as the state issuing government rules to control the means of production.  Socialism is defined as the state taking over and actually trying to run the means of production.  So, Obamacare is not replacing a previous free market health care system. Obamacare is replacing a previous fascist health care system which -- since President Lyndon Johnson intervened with his Great Society -- has been screwing up America's health care with all its governmental interventions for the last 50 years.  Obamacare is simply another variation, an extension, on our previous state collectivism.  And it, too, will fail for all the same basic economic reasons that its predecessor was failing.  Obamacare, stripping away the veil of the government acting as the robbery broker, is nothing more than one group of individuals stating that they have the right to demand that doctors and health care professionals must provide them with health care.  In other words, the rights of doctors are supposedly subservient to others who are demanding that doctors owe them their health care services as a natural right.  But this defines a master-slave relationship, American citizens being cast as the masters and doctors cast as the slaves.  In a free market system, American citizens and doctors would be voluntarily exercising their rights to choose which health care services they want to exchange.  In a free market system, nobody has a right to demand that another person must be his/her economic slave and thus must provide their services or products as a so-called right.  Medical care is, therefore, not a right.  It is simply an exchangeable service or commodity in the free market.  This is true for all services and commodities in the market, including education, cars, food, computers, etc.  Nobody's services should be somebody else's demand to receive as a right.  Otherwise, we are simply establishing a culture of slavery.  Rights are not exchangeable commodities.  Rights are individual freedoms, not commodities and services.  Freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, association, etc. are not bought and sold commodities in a free market.  And this is where Liberals get very confused.  They first distance themselves from their robberies by using the government as their robbery brokers and then claim that they have a right to other people's commodities and services.  Thus, they create government robbery programs and give them fancy names such as The Great Society, Social Security, Medicare, The Affordable Care Act, and so on, as if it's not a robbery if they use the government to perform the robbery for them.  And the more people who commit the robbery, the less of a robbery it becomes?  The real irony is how the victims in this great government robbery scheme often fail to reason what is really going on and begin calling for the very robbery that robs them in their own profession.  Teachers and doctors do this all the time, and then wonder why their profession starts crumbling into total disarray as the government performs its robbery duties.  Hence we get monstrosities such as Leave No Child Behind, Race To The Top, and Obamacare.  The predictable end result:  civil war and The Holocaust, since, in reality, reciprocal rip-off rights can never be implemented and somebody must be blamed.  Remember, Obamacare is not about health care; it is about individual rights vs. coerced state collectivism.

--  Wed Oct 30, 2013  Lying through his teeth, President Barack Obama claimed over two dozen times, "If you like your current health care plan and doctor, I guarantee that you will be able to keep them under Obamacare."  Lied?  Yes, lied, because he already knew damn well, as far back as 2010, that some 60% to 70% of  individuals would not only lose their individual health care plans but that the cost of new health care plans would greatly increase.  This was no accident.  The President and his advisors have planned this canard for the last 4 years and were advised by both health care professionals and the IRS that individual costs would skyrocket.  While the President claimed that everybody's existing plan would be "grandfathered in," and that everybody could keep their existing plan, HHS AND the IRS issued rulings that CHANGED the definition of "grandfathered in" so that if insurance companies did anything such as change a premium or merged with another company or fed a Doggie Bon Bon to their dog, then the "grandfathered in" definition does not apply.  Hence the Obama Administration knew from the outset that virtually nobody in this category (14 million individuals) would be able to keep their existing plans, and thus begets the Big Lie.  Why did Obama and his handler Ms. Valerie Jarrett lie?  Because their REAL GOAL is for Obamacare to fail so that they can move the United States onto a government-run national socialist health care system.  And that's why this entire health care debacle is so troubling:  namely, those in charge have known all along that their ultimate goal was to move us onto a nationalized health care system, which is tantamount to institutionalizing fascism for at least one-sixth of the American economy.  Once again, as we listen to the Obamacare congressional health care hearings, we must remember that the real issue is individual rights, not the cost of the system or when will errors be corrected or any other empirical parameters.  That's like arguing during the Third Reich in Germany in the 1930s about the parameters and problems in shipping Jews off to re-education camps rather than the question of individual rights of Jews being shipped off to anywhere.  Who cares about the problems and parameters of a government program that is violating individual rights when it is the moral philosophy of the violation of individual rights that should be of major concern?  Let's face it, if the government can violate one of your rights to implement a program, then we have established the precedent for the government to violate ALL the rights of everybody to establish anything.  In other words, once the Republicans on the health care committee accept the premise that it is OK to violate the individual's right to choose in an economic exchange process, then they have lost the debate.  Accept a false premise, and you have already lost the argument.  That's -- unfortunately -- where we are today:  not arguing about individual rights but rather how best to violate said rights.  What trait for the commodity we call health care exempts it from all the basic laws of free market economics?  Does free market economics really fall apart depending upon the specific commodity or service being exchanged?  Really?  If so, then perhaps the laws of physics changes in different galaxies, too.  Wow, what a discovery: no universal rights for humans and no universal laws in physics.

--  Sun Oct 27, 2013  Well, well, well.  Looks like the Tea Party and other Libertarian groups can now say, "I told you so!"  The roll out of Obamacare on its online Web Site,, has been a total disaster.  Millions have tried to log on.  Only a few thousand -- or less in many states -- have succeeded in traversing the computer obstacles  to obtain some kind of health insurance, mostly at a higher cost that their previous insurance.  Policies cost a lot more than citizens expected.  No, Obama, citizens did not get to keep their current insurance.  Obama lied.  And if you don't obtain health insurance by next March or whenever the Affordable Health Care law mandates, you will be "TAXED" not fined by the IRS.  The difference between a "fine" and a "tax" being the distinction by which Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John Roberts, ruled that Obamacare was constitutional because taxation (not a fine) is legal.  What a stretch that was: Justice Roberts had to first introduce the term "tax" into the Obamacare law in order to then rule that a "fine" could morph into a "tax."  Now that Obamacare has rolled out -- and over the cliff into nowheresville -- we have the televised spectacle of a Congressional committee trying to find out what went wrong.  Why is bombing out all over the place?  Why did it cost $684 million, 5-6 times more than originally estimated?  All the project vendors working on this Healthcare Titanic are simply pointing fingers at each other or CMS -- the government entity responsible for implementing the ACA under HHS Secretary Sebelius who didn't bother to show up to this important Congressional meeting.  Meanwhile, President Obama is busy giving a news conference in the Pink Room of the While House, blabbering about how badly the US needs to grant amnesty to 20 million illegal Mexicans who he expects to vote for the Democrats in the future.  What does he care about the total train wreck of Obamacare?  He's busy buying future left Liberal votes.  Back to the congressional hearing on why Obama's Web Site is a total failure, the excuses coughed up by the computer project vendors who failed -- along with CMS and HHS -- are a real hoot.  It is obvious that there was NO project management whatsoever.  The project is five times over budget.  Over $600 million dollars for an initially estimated $90 million computer project.  When asked why didn't the lead computer company inform CMS whether the project would bomb or not, a Ms. Campbell (in charge of CGI Federal) responded with, "It wasn't our responsibility to advise CMS whether the system should be a go or no-go."  Errrt, screech, halt!  Are you kidding?  It is exactly the project vendor's prime responsibility to inform the client -- CMS and HHS -- about whether the project should be implemented or not.  In fact, this should have been done long before the budget doubled, tripled, quadrupled, and quintupled.  Ms. Campbell is a total incompetent.  So is CMS, and Sec of HHS Sebelius, and President Obama for not asking a simple question:  namely, hey guys, where are we on the project?  And it wasn't the prime vendor's responsibility to provide status reports?  Or Sec of HHS Sebelius' responsibility to demand status reports?  Wow, see how wonderful state collectivism works?  And if you don't sign up soon on this broken Obamacare Health Care system, the IRS will come knocking on your door and FINE -- oops, I mean TAX -- your ass.  Ironically, Obama and RINO politicians such as Sen. John McCain have asked private enterprise from Silicon Valley to show up to solve's computer problems.  You know, the private sector that the government says is why they had to transfer our nation's health care system to the government in the first place.  Because the free market and private enterprise are pig pirate capitalists, right?  Now it's "help, help, help us fix our Health Care Train Wreck!"  What a contradiction.  But here's the real problem:  Obamacare is an individual rights issue, not an argument about empirical data results.  Obamacare is a violation of your individual right to choose which services or commodities you want to trade or exchange or purchase in a free and open market.  This issue is not about how much Obamacare costs or whether it was implemented on time or what the parameters of the online system will be.  And now we have the spectacle of Republican and Democrat politicians screaming at each other on nationalized TV about the empirical results of the online system while virtually NOBODY is zeroing in on the real issue:  namely, Obamacare must be abolished not because the rollout of doesn't work, but because it is a violation of your individual rights.  Note:  Obamacare is not "settled law."  It is what is called "pretended law."  Pretended law remains in force until it is challenged and overturned by -- in this case -- another Supreme Court judgment or via the US Congress or via the people.  There are various constitutional appeals winding their way through the court system today that could easily overturn Obamacare, one of which is that the "fee" clause which Justice Roberts relied upon to redefine as a "tax" did not originate in the US House.  It originated in the US Senate.  This is a violation of the Constitution's Origination Clause, which rightfully belongs to the US House, not the US Senate.  The Origination Clause states that fees, including taxes, must originate in the House, not the Senate.  The US Supreme Court could overturn ALL of Obamacare on this one issue alone.  Let's hope this happens.

--  Thur Aug 29, 2013  So here's the Big Question, and I'm directing this to those who are following around (like little puppy dogs) our off-planet friends (the Plejaren) living on Erra in another dimension that is a fraction of a second off from our own vibrational time frame.  Those who don't know what I'm referring to can log onto and catch up to the fact that we are not alone in the Milky Way Galaxy, much less the entire universe.  Look it up; I don't have the time and space -- no pun intended -- to educate you here or now about this subject.  Anyway, the Big Question is: who is worse, a president such as George Bush who knowingly lies to us and pulls off a lot of stunts for his military industrial complex and banking buddies to further enrich themselves OR a naive president WITH SUPPOSEDLY "GOOD INTENTIONS" who stupidly leads us down an economic path of total altruistic state collectivism -- let's just call it socialism -- that must inexorably end up in economic destruction and World War III?  Neither is good but the point is:  "good intentions" by ignoramus presidents is not better than "bad intentions" by bad presidents.  They're the same:  bad.  The real problem that I have noticed from the Plejaren and Billy Meier and their lock-step followers is that NONE of them in this intellectual camp understand the basics of simple economics and thus think that just because somebody has "good intentions," they are OK guys and will become a suitable president.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Any leader who is an idiot is exactly that:  an idiot.  And he will lead you over the cliff just as surely as a smart bad buy will.  This brings up a very interesting phenomenon:  ET humans -- of which there are some estimated 7.5 million different races in the Milky Way Galaxy alone, according to the Plejaren -- have not evolved equally in every area of intellectual endeavor such as physics, chem, bio, and especially economics so that they have these areas fully and equally integrated into their intelligence.  By "equal" I do not mean individuals, I mean "equal" areas of intellectual endeavor.  Thus, one ends up with ET humans who can jump to hyper light speed, traverse what we call "time" whether it's a "dimension" or not, but don't understand how basic economics works.  Thus they do not comprehend the difference -- and its ultimate economic effects -- caused by, for example, using fiat currency vs. hard commodity money.  They do not understand how prices -- which are simply qualitative subjective value judgments by individuals -- can only be formed in a free market and once that market is destroyed, say by central bankers counterfeiting the money supply, the economy must necessarily go into self-destruct mode.  Why don't the ET Plejaren understand this?  After all, they are some 18,000 years ahead of us in physics, medicine, astronomy, etc.?  Look at it this way.  Like us, they are living in a culture that took a long time to build up and the current Plejaren did not invent their past discoveries any more than our current Earth humans invented the internal combustion engine, light bulbs or computers.  Yes, the people on Earth today know how to drive a car, use a cell phone, and take antibiotics but they did not invent them.  Similarly, most Plejaren today, like most Earth humans, have no clue about how economics really works.  THEREFORE, -- and this is a big THEREFORE -- the Plejaren make the mistake that all you have to do is WANT to make the economy "prosperous" and it will happen.  That's why in the 1930's and 40's the Plejaren mistakenly gave (via telepathic vibrations) the plans to build beam ships to scientists in Germany's Third Reich and then had to cancel those plans and beam ships when they discovered that the Nazis weren't the "good guys" they thought they were.  Amazingly, the Plejaren were not aware that national socialism must inexorably lead to the Holocaust and the economic destruction that it did.  Thus, today, the Plejaren continue to make the same mistake and for the same basic reason.  They think that US president Barack Obama's "good intentions" are all that it takes to lead America and the world out of its current Recession/Depression.  If they understood anything about basic Austrian free market economics, they would not come to that conclusion.  Similarly, if I could transport 10,000 Egyptian children from 5,000 years ago and raise them in today's US economy, they would all learn how to use iPhones, drive a car, and turn on the TV.  But that does not mean they understand how these inventions work and they would not necessarily be the ones who invent anything new.  Same for the Plejaren.  They are living off previously invented technology and very few of them, if any, especially hard physical scientists, understand anything about praxeology (human action) which is the subject of free market economics.  Conclusion:  thanks to the Plejaren for all the physics and time travel info and saving the planet Earth from other ET "invaders" in the past -- which they claim and I believe them -- but I caution you all from Erra to please bone up on the basic laws of econ.  Those who just live and breathe every word from the contact notes of the Plejaren should learn to question intellectual issues using your own brain and stop just re-hashing what you heard or think you heard from our ET friends.  Do I question the Plejaren's existence?  No.  Do I question how fast they can travel through the universe?  No.  Do I question how they farm their agriculture or build beam ships?  No.  Do I question their knowledge in every area of endeavor?  Yes.  Especially basic economics.  And that's the name of that tune.  They claim that they support Obama and that he is one of the best presidents the US has ever had -- or at least that's what some Earth humans have translated from the Plejaren.  Obama may have "good intentions."  But, as we have stated above, that is not the issue.  The road to hell is paved with good intentions.  We are concerned with rational results from rational intentions.  Obama is obviously an ignoramus -- especially in economics -- whose strings are being pulled by other ignoramuses.  The road to Hell is paved with "good intentions," and that's exactly where Obama and his "handlers" are leading us: straight to economic Hell and thus to WW III.  Good thing the Plejaren are forbidden by the Galaxy's High Council to not overly "influence" the direction that Earth humans are going; otherwise, they might think it would be great to implement a world state collectivist government on planet Earth.  Then again, we could do with more intellectual "influences" from the Plejaren regarding free market capitalism as a basis for more rational social-political-economics.  Unless of course, we are supposed to go through Hell in order to get to "Heaven" -- rational thought, not a location in Earth major religions -- and Obama is just playing his part?  The Plejaren may be 18,000 years ahead of us in technology but they appear to be about 200 years behind us -- at least Libertarians -- in economics.

--  Sun Aug 11, 2013  Entrepreneur Donald Trump said it best:

"Let me get this straight:

We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't, which purportedly covers at least ten million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke!!!!!"

--  Sun May 26, 2013  Perhaps we are lucky that Barack Obama was elected in both 2008 and 2012 as President of the United States.  That way, we got beat over the head with the left Liberal ideology of altruistic state collectivism early on, in one big whopping fell swoop.  We are now experiencing first hand -- in fast motion, fast and furious motion -- how economies evolve from a half-ass free market (mixed economy) directly to national socialism.  Not since the 1930s have we have such an opportunity.  ObamaCare with the IRS running our national socialist health care program is about as Hitlerian Brown Shirt as you can get.  Just think, if we had elected a Republican In Name Only (RINO) -- such as Mitt Romney -- or your standard Hillary Clinton type of left Liberal, they would have fed us their poisonous Marxist ideology piece meal, very slowly, so we would have never noticed how we were evolving from a free market to a whoop-tee-doo, gung ho, full-fledged military dictatorship with Der Fuhrer, Barack Obama, at the top dispensing favors, cookies, money, and crackerjacks to his/her friends and government accomplices.  This is exactly what is going on with both the RINOs and President Barack Obama today, only at breakneck speed.  The major root of all evil in the economy today is the destruction of all of our values as our money has been destroyed because that is what money really is, in reality, an exchange of values.  Money is not paper.  Money is not even gold.  Money is a medium of economic exchange, an exchange of prioritized values between individuals.  And when that value system between free individuals is taken over and counterfeited into fake values by either a government or a group of bankers sanctioned to perform theft by a government, then that is the end of your society, your culture, your economy.  The slow transition of switching our money from gold and silver, to paper, to plastic, and then to simply numbers created out of nowhere on a big mainframe computer in the bowels of the Federal Reserve central banks is, in actuality, the slow transition of dumping our society's values and replacing them with lies, lies, and then more lies.  Hence, we have inflated Federal Reserve Notes, wrecking the free market process of price creation in the market, lying to the citizens about the stored values of their money in a bank, or a Certificate of Deposit, or an annuity, interest rates, or even the value of gold stock which the central bankers are currently manipulating on a daily basis in the commodities market.  This process of destroying all of our values in the economy, both financially and morally, was greatly sped up with the election of President Barack Obama as he has doubled our national debt from $10 trillion to $17 trillion in 4 short years and is trying to force the IRS between you and your doctor.  Not understanding what money really is or how it represents a moral value system, Obama is on such a rapid path of economic destruction -- and thus total value destruction -- that it is now becoming quite obvious to even the most liberal of the Liberals in this nation.  They are now concerned; they are running for cover from Obama and his immoral culture of corruption.  If this fast forward to national socialism helps us to understand sooner and more clearly how bad it would be living under that type of regime and thus helps us to not go in that direction, then that is all for the good.  So maybe we should be thanking President Barack Obama for enlightening us much earlier than we otherwise would have been about the Laws of Cause and Effect -- although not intentionally on his part.  One wonders that if Obama's Perfect Storm of (1) his Benghazi Incident of getting our Ambassador murdered while trying to cover up his international gun running to Al Qaeda, (2) his use of the IRS to deny tax exempt status to Conservative and Tea Party groups, and (3) his use of the Justice Department to spy upon and rip off AP journalists' personal communications, if that tri-fective screwing over of our moral values does not wake up Americans about how socialism evolves in an economy, then nothing will.  So, thank you Mr. President, for the fast track lesson in How To Get To National Socialism Faster Than Hell.  We know you meant well, but the road to Hell is paved with good but stupid intentions.  Presidents and central bankers rarely see or care about the disastrous results of their policies, the inflation, the unemployment, and the wars.  And even if they do, it's always somebody else's fault.  Now it's time for an impeachment.  You, Mr. President, your impeachment.  For all the high crimes, felonies, and misdemeanors you've committed against the citizens of the United States.  Time to get back to individual rights, freedom to voluntarily exchange, and a real constitutional government.

--  Thur May 23, 2013  IRS Tax Exemption Director, Lois Lerner, planned to take the Fifth Amendment when called to testify before the US Congress yesterday.  So she took the stand and immediately issued a statement saying she was a good little girl, never took the candy from the cookie jar, didn't break any laws, goes to church every Sunday, never swears, eats her asparagus before getting her ice cream, and closes with, "and I am not answering any questions today and am invoking my 5th Amendment privilege, so there, nya nya nya nya nya."  Whoa, hey wait a minute, girl friend.  First, can one invoke the 5th Amendment Privilege while testifying before the US Congress?  After all, it ain't a court room.  If the answer is 'NO,' then Ms. Lerner could go to jail for contempt.  Number two, if the answer to (1) is yes, just like in a court room, one cannot waltz, jitterbug, or foxtrot into court, make statements of denial, "Like, yo, I did not rob that bank," and then proceed to take the 5th Amendment.  Once you open your big fat mouth and start talking, you have waived your 5th Amendment rights to further questioning and answering or else what is the purpose of the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights? If you say you are standing on the 5th Amendment for ALL of the upcoming questions, then invoke it and shut up.  But don't show up to court or Congress and start issuing all sorts of statements and denials and then claim you're not going to answer any future questions because you're standing on the Fifth.  Either stand on the 5th or don't.  And while it is OK to take the 5th on your choice of questions, then do so but don't sit there and say you are taking the 5th on all further questions that haven't been asked yet and then rant and rave about your innocence to questions that haven't been asked yet.  Ms. Lerner's attorneys must be idiots.  Remember, the reason one takes the 5th Amendment is because one is claiming that an answer to a question may tend to incriminate oneself and one cannot be compelled to testify against oneself.  So if you don't know the question yet, how can you know that said future question may tend to incriminate you?  This is just more of the same arrogant action by IRS employees lately who have been called before Congress to answer for wrongdoings and don't want to answer any questions.  Just why were you running a program of tax exempt discrimination against Conservatives, Tea Partiers, and other Patriot groups, Ms. IRS goon?  Tell us.  and, more importantly, tell us WHO gave you that order to do so, so that we can trace it all the way back to whichever oval room in the White House it originated.  Oops, did I give you a clue?  I doubt it was in the kitchen or the laundry room.

--  Mon  May 13, 2013  Time for the US Congress to impeach Mr. Peachy Obama.  Why?  For lying to the American public about why he told the US military guarding the Benghazi Consulate to "stand down" and allow our ambassador and three other Americans to be slaughtered on the premises.  And why would Mr. Impeachment-bait do that?  Because it looks like he was trying to cover up the running of guns to the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria.  Not that the Syrian government is any great saint.  Neither the Syrian government or the Muslim Brotherhood are fighting for individual rights and freedoms.  They're both just different shades of altruistic state collectivism, or rather altruistic church collectivism, same thing in the Middle East.  But the problem with Obama playing this dangerous game is that he apparently was willing to sacrifice American officials and then try to cover it all up by hoaking up a phony anti-Muslim video and blaming it on some poor nitwit producer in Hollywood.  And while Sec of State Hillary Clinton may not have given the "stand down" orders -- mainly because the Joint chiefs of Staff do not report to the Bitch of State who likes to lie to US Congressional investigators -- she participated in the whole UN Ambassador Susan Rice fake video ruse.  And Clinton had the temerity to scream -- literally scream -- at the US Congressional investigators, "At this point, who cares" about how the terrorists overran the Benghazi Consulate and raped, tortured, and murdered our Ambassador and three other Americans.  "Maybe the terrorists were just out for a stroll, or maybe who knows whaterver," she implied as she then yelled, "At this point, who cares, the deed is done?"  Well, Bitch of State Clinton, guess what?  The murdered victims' families care.  We care.  We care because now we know what you think of us.  Now we know what Obama and YOU think of us American citizens and how you wouldn't hesitate to throw us to the wolves if it advances your political agenda both here and abroad.  It's one thing to have done the murderous deed, both at the Obama "stand down" level and the Clinton "I'll go along with that" level; but it's quite another to blame some poor innocent slob making a Grade F anti-Muslim movie, send our UN Ambassador Susan Rice around to lie on all the major TV network talk shows, and try to cover it all up.  Nixon resigned over a 10-cent Watergate burglary that was nothing but a pissy-assy bugging of the opposition party's politicians.  They got him for obstruction of justice and the cover up, not the bugging crime.  Obama and Thugs, however, set up a murder of four Americans to hide their nefarious gun running to the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, and then tried to cover it up.  If this isn't an impeachable offense, then I don't know what is.  President Obama and former Sec of State Clinton deserve at least to be booted out of politics:  as in forever.  And today can't be too soon.  Strike three, Bud, you're outta there!

--  Sun Apr 07, 2013  Ah yes, Obamacare "Navigators."  Exactly what this nation now needs to push our economy right down the tubes into total national socialism.  What the hell is an Obamacare Navigator?  What kind of federal job is that?  A Navigator is a previous Obama Acorn neighborhood "organizer" -- or pimp -- whose job it will be to explain to the public, door to door, how to navigate through the bureaucratic federal health care maze that is being shoved down our throats because US Supreme Court Justice Roberts did not have the balls to call a spade a spade:  i.e. Obamacare should have been dumped a long time ago because it is obviously unconstitutional.  A 12-year child could have figured that out.  Obama's cleverly created new militia of health care police, the Navigators, are slated to be paid up to $48 per hour, which is about $100,000 per year plus benefits.  How many Navigators does Obama think we might need in the US?  Estimates for California are 21,000 Navigators.  Crunching the numbers, if CA has 38 million people and the US population is 315 million, that means the US needs about 8.3 x 21,000 Navigators.  That equals about 175,000 Navigators to tell Americans how to navigate through our screwed up nationalized health care system.  What else will these Navigators do?  According to the White House, Navigators should be the same ethnic percentage of those whose neighborhoods they will be invading.  That way, they will all be speaking the same 'George Orwell 1984' New Speak, especially when the Navigators get to the bottom of their forms and ask Joe Citizen for his political affiliation information.  No lie.  They will be asking for the home owner's/renter's political affiliation.  And, oh yeah, they will also be asking about each Joe Doe's personal medical information so they can do their job of navigating the poor slob through Obama's 2,700 pages of federal health care bullshit, which even Congress and the President can't decipher.  But the Navigators can.  Somehow.  Because as soon as you attach the words 'federal government' to anything, it becomes clear as a bell.  Ding dong.  How do you feel about telling some pimp-looking Bozo knocking on your door all about Aunt Tillie's back ache, sister Suzie's pregnancy, and Mom's cancer treatment, plus give out the social security numbers for everybody in the family so the Navigator can do his/her job?  Swoosh, there goes doctor-patient confidentiality out the door.  Bingo, there goes your SS number into the files of all the computer hackers in the world as the Navigators figure out they can make a lot more money selling your personal info to hackers and advertisers with mailing lists.  The sheer invasion of privacy alone should make Americans and state politicians shudder with fear.  Unfortunately, it didn't make Idaho legislators shudder with anything since the idiots were the first GOP state to pass a state health care exchange in the nation and have now been informed -- the dolts -- that the state, not the federal government -- gets to pick up the costs for their state Navigators.  Yeah, really brilliant, Gov Butch Otter.  Really brilliant.  Didn't see that one coming did you?  And there will be lots more bureaucracy coming Idaho's way, too.  We tried to tell you not to deal with the devil but you wouldn't listen.  Maybe you'll catch on later, who knows?

--  Fri Jan 25, 2013  More on Sec of State Hillary Clinton and the so-called Congressional Inquiry into what happened regarding the Benghazi Murders at our US Embassy in Libya.  First, it was not an inquiry.  All Democratic Senators on the committee simply smooched Hillary Clinton's butt and gave a speech.  Second, only three Republicans asked Hillary any pertinent questions.  Third, Hillary did not answer any questions -- pertinent or not -- but rather went off on tirades that had nothing to do with a real inquiry.  But the really horrible thing that happened was that the whole "investigative" circus reveals how absurd Congress has become, what low level bureaucrats the US now has installed in important positions of power -- such as Sec of State -- and how bad off the US will be perceived in the near future.  Ms. Clinton stated that the State Dept has 70,000 employees.  70,000 employees!  If we have 70 embassies in 70 major countries, that's 1,000 State Dept employees at each embassy.  What overkill!  What could all these clowns be doing?  Certainly not their jobs or else we wouldn't be talking about the Benghazi Murders at an investigative hearing in Congress.  Hillary states that she was not aware of much of anything.  She had no budget money, she claims, but Sen. Rand Paul pointed out all the millions of dollars the State Dept has spent on parties and other crap.  Hillary, in response to Sen. Johnson's question about the sequence of events that brought about the Benghazi Murders and storming and burning of our embassy, literally jumped out of her chair and screamed, "Who cares?  We have four dead people.  What difference does it make whether it was a terrorist act or some guy decided it would be fun to knock off Americans at our Libyan Embassy?"  But wait a minute, Ms. Sec of State.  It DOES make a difference and that is precisely WHY we are conducting this hearing.  As Sen. Rand Paul stated, "I would have relieved you of your post, Ms. Secretary."  Sen. Paul asked whether Hillary was aware of what was going on in a huge warehouse building next to the Benghazi Embassy since it was widely rumored that guns and other weapons may have been stored and distributed from said building as there has been a lot of recent shipping activity nearby.  Hillary said she did not know anything about the goings on at a building next door.  I have an important question for Hillary:  if you are building an embassy, doesn't it behoove you to know what is going on around your embassy?  Same with the supposed Osama bin Laden compound in Pakistan right next door to Pakistan's "West Point."  Doesn't it behoove the Pakistani govt AND the US to know what the hell is going on in what looks like Ft. Knox down the road apiece?  Duh.  Bottom line:  Obama has no foreign policy; Sec of State Hillary Clinton was just a low level mindless bureaucrat going through the motions, and Congress is showing itself to be totally irrelevant.  Along with the Judicial Dept and all of Washington DC.  You are now witnessing the rapid decline of the American Republic.  If anybody who worked for me replied as Hillary has over the last two days, I would have immediately fired their little asses.  Which is exactly what should have happened to Ms. Clinton four months ago.  And our US President is not even a legitimate citizen, much less a president of anything.  At most, he's a puppet of the Federal Reserve.  Plus, the GOP has totally imploded into it's own altruistic state collectivism, no different than the economic fascists who call themselves "progressives."

--  Wed Jan 23, 2013  Sec of State Hillary Clinton has now recovered sufficiently from her fake "bonk on the head" to show up to a Congressional Inquiry about the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the Benghazi Embassy murders in Libya last year that took four American lives.  Prez Obama and Ambassador Rice concocted a ridiculous story that some bozo in Hollywood created a YouTube video that made fun of Muslims and Allah, and that that sparked a riot against the US compound in Libya.  Rice ran around babbling this YouTube video excuse on all the major TV talk shows, President Obama babbled this same excuse in the Rose Garden with Hillary standing by clinching her teeth and not looking like she agreed with him, and the FBI even arrested and detained some guy in Hollywood who supposedly produced or financed or shot the alleged video.  We now know that the YouTube video excuse was total bull dukie.  The big question is:  why did Obama and the administration try to pull the wool over America's eyes?  What was really going on?  Did the Obama administration try to do a "fast and furious" guns deal out of Libya with other nations such as Turkey, like the failed "fast and furious" guns deal with Mexico?  Or is Obama and his administration really just a bunch of bunglers in foreign affairs?  Now, Sec of State Hillary Clinton is testifying before Congress that (1) she needs more money, (2) it's her responsibility but wasn't her fault (really? how does that work?), (3) American embassies are being attacked all over the world (I wonder why), (4) she has implemented a new better plan so it will never happen again, (5) Obama did the right thing, (6) Ambassador Rice did the right thing, and (7) blah blah blah bureaucratic double-talk about everything except the who, what, when, where, why and how behind the Benghazi incident.  Nobody asked Sec of State Clinton any REAL questions -- except Senators John McCain and Rand Paul who completely disagreed with her answers, refuted all of them, and ripped her a new one.  In short, the upshot of the congressional hearing today was nothing except the Liberals kissing Hillary's butt, only one or two GOP senators standing up to slap her stupid answers silly, and all that was accomplished is that Hillary was a good little girl who pretended to exonerate the Obama administration -- and cover her own ass -- so she can run for the Oval Office in 2016.  Nobody, and I mean nobody, except possibly Sen. Rand Paul at other times outside today's Benghazi Hearings, have asked the fundamental question:  what the hell is the US doing sticking its nose in the business of all the nations in the Middle East in the first place?  We are there because the central bankers and OPEC oil ministers are hell bent on fixing the monopoly price of oil, forcing all participants to use only Federal Reserve Notes for all oil transactions as agreed upon at the last Bretten Woods meeting some time ago.  And these banking/oil parties have convinced both GOP and Liberal Congressmen to use the US Military to protect those fundamental banking interests.  So now all we hear about is a continual tit-for-tat response to whichever side's latest bombing, or who shot at who last week, or who blew up which embassy or trade center last.  It's no different than two tribes in the jungle committing atrocities against each other for whatever the other tribe did last week.  America has been reduced to a feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys.  Nobody wants to ask the fundamental question.  And the people who keep the wars going, the bankers, the oil companies, the arms manufacturers, the vendors supplying the military, and the bureaucrats who wring their hands at committee hearings such as the Benghazi Murders and bloviate a bunch of bullshit are busy running the Big Show.  With you, the taxpayer, financing all of it -- in more ways than you will ever know.  Hyper-inflation of non gold-backed money has serious consequences, both nationally and internationally.  If you do not understand how the central bankers are the fundamental root problem, then you do not understand what money really is.  And Hillary may get away with the Benghazi debacle and run for president in 2016.

U of Idaho Wallace pleads GUILTY in $136 mil University Place fiasco...

25% Off Boise's Watergate book
@ Random House Xlibris Bookstore
Soft Cover Was $20.99 Now
Hard Cover Was $30.99 Now

Now Available as an eBook at Random House Xlibris Bookstore

Deep Throat, Deep Throat II, Deepest many damn Deep Throats are there in Idaho anyway?



About the author...I was born at the Alamo.  Then we moved to Japan.  Then to California, where I learned the dirty bop.  Attended UC Berkeley.  Got drafted into the Army.  Worked for the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, in the Pentagon and Saigon, a steel vault two feet thick with cipher locks.  Top Secret Crypto Eyes Only security clearance.  Cranked up four corporations.  Managed Pacific Northwest branch of  a NY Software Company.  Moved to Boise, Idaho.  I'm an investigative journalist writing under a fake name.  Nobody would name their kid "Deep."  And no, my last name is not "Throat."  I dig up dirty laundry.  Dirty political laundry.  On the QT.  Hush-hush.  It's a dirty job, long hours and the pay stinks.  But it's a living and there's lots of dirty political laundry in Idaho.  I lean over a lot of fences, drink a lot of Rocket Java, and listen through beer mugs pressed against bathroom walls.  Right now I'm on my way down to check out another dead body at the Idaho State Legislature.  I better be careful...or it might be my own. -- Deep Throat II   Contact author

What they're saying about

Boise's Watergate:

"Of course it was a fix.  It's an incestuous mess." -- Senator Stan Hawkins (R-Ucon), 18-year veteran legislator who voted NO on the University Place fiasco

"You are on the right track.  But you need deeper background.  I have it.  I know where every skeleton is buried.  But I need deepest cover.  You cannot reveal anything about me, not even where or how or by what means you obtain info from me.  Zip, zilch, zero, nada.  You must protect this source even if a judge threatens to send you to jail for contempt." -- Deepest Throat, anonymous source

"Finally, someone with the brains and guts enough to connect the dots between the $100 million Ada County Court House scam and the $136 million University Place fiasco as one big crime spree against the taxpayers by the Boise lawyers, politicians, and Cryptic Partners.  A fast read, this book deserves to become a best seller." -- Sharon Ullman, Ada County Commissioner (2001-2003, 2009-2012)

     Table of Contents    

Chapter  1 - The Cookie Monsters
Chapter  2 - All The Governor's Men
Chapter  3 - Cryptic Partners
Chapter  4 - Shark Frenzy:  Give-Us-Your-Purses
Chapter  5 - Holy Eureka, It's "Hoover Time!"
Chapter  6 - UI and UIF Cookie Jars
Chapter  7 - Nolo Conflicto?
Chapter  8 - Governor's Legislative Dog & Pony Show
Chapter  9 - Boise's Watergate
Chapter 10 - ISBA Throws Monkey Wrench at UIF

Chapter 11 - UIF fires Cryptic Partners for $18 mil? 
                    Excuuse Me?

Chapter 12 - Whistle Blower Winstead
Chapter 13 - Follow The Money
Chapter 14 - "Absolute Power Corrupts"


Hit Counter Hit Counter

    back to top... 

Quack Off Points to Ponder

"The political philosophy of our Founding Fathers is so thoroughly buried under decades of statist misrepresentations on one side and empty lip-service on the other, that it has to be re-discovered not ritualistically repeated." -- Ayn Rand


Holy moley, look how fast America is going bankrupt: (click on the puddy)


      National News      

Media Hide Facts, Call Everyone Else a Liar

by Ann Coulter

July 04, 2015

Washington, DC -- When Donald Trump said something not exuberantly enthusiastic about Mexican immigrants, the media’s response was to boycott him. One thing they didn’t do was produce any facts showing he was wrong.

Trump said: “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

The first thing a news fact-checker would have noticed is: THE GOVERNMENT WON’T TELL US HOW MANY IMMIGRANTS ARE COMMITTING CRIMES IN AMERICA.

Wouldn’t that make any person of average intelligence suspicious? Not our media. They’re in on the cover-up.

A curious media might also wonder why any immigrants are committing crimes in America. A nation’s immigration policy, like any other government policy, ought to be used to help the people already here — including the immigrants, incidentally.

It’s bad enough that immigrants, both legal and illegal, are accessing government benefits at far above the native rate, but why would any country be taking...  More...

Knowing What We Know Now, Would You Say that Jeb Bush is Retarded?

by Ann Coulter

May 22, 2015

Washington, DC -- Was Jeb Bush too busy watching tele-novelas during his brother's presidency to remember the Iraq War?

We went to war at such breakneck speed after 9/11, that, before the invasion, I was able to write approximately 30 columns about it, give five dozen speeches on it, discuss it on TV a hundred times and read 1,089 New York Times editorials denouncing the "rush to war."

So I remember the arguments.

Contrary to the fairy tale the left has told itself since Obama truculently gave away America's victory in Iraq, our argument wasn't that we had to invade Iraq because of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. And the left's argument certainly was not: "He doesn't have any WMDs!"

Our argument was: There were lots of reasons to get rid of Saddam Hussein, and none to keep him.

Indeed, after Bush's State of the Union address laying out the case for war with Iraq, The New York Times complained that he had given too many reasons: "Even the rationale for war seems to change from day to day. Mr. Bush ticked off a litany of accusations against Iraq in his State of the Union address ..." (New York Times, Feb. 2, 2003)

Among the reasons we invaded Iraq were:

(1) Saddam had given shelter to terrorists who killed Americans. After 9/11, it was time for him to pay the price:

-- The mastermind of the Achille Lauro hijacking, Abu Abbas, who murdered a wheelchair-bound American citizen, Leon Klinghoffer, then forced the passengers to throw his body overboard, was living happily in Iraq. (Captured by U.S. forces in Baghdad less than a month after our invasion.)

-- The terrorist who orchestrated the murder of American diplomat Laurence Foley in October 2002, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, also took refuge in Saddam's Iraq. (Killed by U.S. forces in Iraq on June 7, 2006.)

-- The one terrorist behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing who got away, Abdul Rahman Yasin, fled to Iraq, where he was given money and lived without fear of being extradited to the United States. (Whereabouts unknown. Possibly being groomed for a prime-time show on MSNBC.)

-- Czech intelligence reported that Mohammed Atta, 9/11 mastermind, More...

Obama Staged Fake Zero Dark Thirty Raid to Knock Off bin Laden?

May 11, 2015

Washington, DC -- Legendary journalist Seymour Hersh has recently claimed that President Obama's alleged take down of terrorist master mind Osama bin Laden in a zero dark thirty helicopter raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011 contained many inaccuracies.

   According to Hersh's American and Pakistani intelligence sources, Osama bin Laden had already been captured by Pakistan and was being held prisoner in the Abbottabad compound since 2006.  Whether the Americans knew about this in 2006 when Bush was president, Hersh didn't say,... yet.

   If President Obama found out after he came into office in 2009, it appears that the Obama Administration saved this knowledge so that it could make use of it in a future take down of bin Laden for political marketing reasons.  Like running for a second US Presidential term.  Also, there was no Navy Seal fire fight.  Instead, Pakistani intelligence insiders allegedly rigged it so that US choppers could fly across Pakistan borders without setting off alarms, landed at the Abbottabad compound, Navy Seals hopped out, ran upstairs and one US trooper simply shot bin Laden dead.

   Then, according to Hersh's sources, the US Seals loaded bin Laden into a body bag and dumped him out of a plane or chopper over some rugged mountainous terrain while claiming that they carried his body to a US aircraft carrier and gave bin Laden a "proper Islamic" burial at sea.

   But here's the thing.  If all of this -- and more -- is true, then that would mean that President Obama and various high level administrative officials were holding Osama bin Laden as marketing fodder (for many years) so President Obama could make an announcement of bin Laden's capture so Americans would cheer and vote for him for a second presidential term:  Hey, looky, looky, stupid American public.  I (President Obama) found bin Laden all of a sudden and have ordered a top secret raid to take out this evil terrorist to save America, yahoo, etc.!

   Note that this scenario is not far off from...  More...

Bergdahl to be Charged with Desertion

Jan 27 2015


reporters at WND

Seven months after the military began an investigation into the disappearance of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and his capture by the Taliban, which held him for five years, a new report indicates Army officials have determined Bergdahl — for whom the administration traded five top Gitmo-held terrorists — will be charged as a deserter.

Retired Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research, made the startling claim during an appearance on “The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News.

Bergdahl’s attorney has received the charges, according to Shaffer, who claims the Obama administration is withholding the report.

O’Reilly said the White House has had this information for a while but has been delaying it under the auspices of Ben Rhodes, assistant national security adviser.

“This is shaping up to be a Titanic struggle behind the scenes,” Shaffer said. “Believe me, the Army here wants to do the right thing. Factually, there’s no way they can not do the right thing regarding Bergdahl. And the White President Obama cozying up to the parents and because he, President Obama, releasing the five Taliban. … The narrative is what the White House does not want to have come out.”

Bergdahl was recovered in Afghanistan by U.S. troops in a controversial swap for five Taliban officials on May 31. He had disappeared from his small patrol base on June 30, 2009, under a cloud of suspicion and fear as it became clear he been captured by militants.

The Army in June launched a new investigation into Bergdahl’s disappearance and capture, amid a raft of accusations from his fellow soldiers that he walked away from his unit on the battlefield and questions about whether the Obama administration handled the prisoner swap legally.

On Jan. 11, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, said he anticipated a decision “fairly soon” on whether the Army would court martial Bergdahl for deserting his post.

“In White House terms, not charging Bergdahl means that he was indeed worth the trade for the Taliban Five. But charging him on any level means that releasing the five Taliban was an error of monstrous proportions, one the administration will...  More...

      International News      

Generals Conclude Obama Backed Al-Qaida

Jan 21 2015


Jerome R. Corsi at WND

“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,” explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who served as a career operations officer with the CIA and currently is vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA counterintelligence expert who worked on the seventh floor at Langley as protective staff to then-CIA Director William Casey, again speaking for himself in his interview with WND, agreed with Lopez that the gun-running operation Stevens managed is a secret the Obama White House and Clinton State Department have sought to suppress from the public.

“The shocking part, maybe even a violation of international law that the Obama administration has been terrified to have fully revealed, is that Stevens as part of his duties as a State Department employee was assisting in the shipment of arms first into Libya for the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, with the weapons shipped subsequently out of Libya into Syria for use by the al-Qaida-affiliated rebels fighting Assad,” Shipp told WND.

“Very possibly, these gun-running activities could be looked at even as treasonable offenses,” he said.

Time for impeachment? -- FM Duck

NEW YORK – The Obama White House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

In WND interviews, several members of the commission have disclosed their finding that the mission of Christopher Stevens, prior to the fall of Gadhafi and during Stevens’ time as U.S. ambassador, was the management of a secret gun-running program operated out of the Benghazi compound.

The Obama administration’s gun-running project in Libya, much like the “fast and furious” program under Eric Holder’s Justice Department, operated without seeking or obtaining authorization by Congress.

WND reported Monday that in exclusive interviews conducted with 11 of the 17 members of the commission, it is clear that while the CCB is still enthusiastic to work with Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, and hopeful that Boehner is serious about the investigation, various members of the CCB, speaking on their own behalf and not as spokesmen for the commission, are expressing concerns, wanting to make sure the Gowdy investigation is not compromised by elements within the GOP.

The Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi’s interim report, in a paragraph titled “Changing sides in the War on Terror,” alleges “the U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias throughout the 2011 rebellion.”

The report asserted the jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy.

“The rebels made no secret of their Al Qaeda affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple media reports,” the interim report said. “And yet, the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al Qaeda.”

The report concluded: “The result in Libya, across much of North Africa, and beyond has been utter chaos, disruption of Libya’s oil industry, the spread of dangerous weapons (including surface-to-air missiles), and the empowerment of jihadist organizations like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Christopher Stevens: ’1st U.S. envoy to al-Qaida’

In the WND interviews, several members of the citizens’ commission, speaking for themselves, not for the commission, added important background to the interim report’s conclusion.

“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,” explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who... More...

Not "Je Suis Charlie," but "Je Suis Socialist"

Jan 08 2015

Washington, DC -- Islamic terrorists knocked off 12 French journalists at Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris yesterday for publishing satirical cartoons depicting Allah.  Not a big surprise since this magazine has been attacked and blown up by Islamic terrorists over the last ten years.

  There are millions of Islamic Muslims living in France but not integrated into the socialist French economy.  There is a double debacle going on in France as the Islamic Muslims are also living in a highly bureaucratic socialist society.  In fact, the Muslims came to France specifically to obtain jobs and the "free" welfare goodies distributed by the French socialist nation.  But as the Muslims showed up to socialist France, they quickly learned that socialist bureaucracy, namely jobs, is based upon who you know, not what you can accomplish or produce.  So the Islamic Muslims are essentially frozen out of the non-free market socialist economy and stuck in Muslim ghettoes.  We're talking 5 million Muslims in Paris No-Go Zones.  No-Go for even the cops.  Just like the blacks in America are stuck in the state collectivist welfare ghettoes created by American left Liberal Progressive Democrats who have created welfare economies in most major cities of America.

  And look at the results in both cases:  France and America.  Islamic Muslims are stuck in poverty in the socialist ghettoes in France, especially Paris, and Afro Americans are stuck in poverty in the socialist ghettoes in America.

  Who is at fault in both cases?  The culprits, of course, are...  More...

      National News      

President Obama Falsely Yells "Fire!" in a Crowded Theatre

Dec 5, 2014

Washington, DC -- President Obama -- and other race-baiting social and political pundits -- are yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre where there is no fire.  This is not an exercise of freedom of speech.  In a crowded theatre, there is an implied contract between everybody in the theatre that they will not fraudulently mislead each other with false statements such as yelling "Fire!" when there is none.  Same for all the drivers on our nations' roads.  There is an implied contract that everybody is not under the influence of mind altering substances -- such as alcohol -- that would cause them to crash their car into others.  That's why the police can legally compel you to take blood alcohol tests and are not violating your rights.

   Similarly, the exercise of freedom of speech does not include yelling "Racism!" by the President of the United States to a crowded, predominantly African American ghetto, in cases when a white police officer defends himself and kills a black perpetrator attacking the police officer or resisting arrest.  Especially, once a grand jury has handed down an indictment of innocence, and all the objective evidence shows that there was no racism involved.  Fraudulent cries of "Racism!" by the President of the US or the US Attorney General or the mayor of the city when there is no proof is not the exercise of freedom of speech but rather a case of fraudulently yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre, causing people to riot and/or trample each other under false pretenses.  Which is exactly what we now have in many cities across America.

  It is also not within the authority of the President -- or other race-baiting social or political pundits -- to attempt to retry a grand jury case in the news media.  This is the equivalent of a lynch mob, a group of people who already know what they...  More...

Prez Obama Urges Public to Not Riot in Ferguson Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San Francisco, Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise Idaho and All Major Cities in America

Nov 27, 2014

Washington, DC -- Immediately after the grand jury in Ferguson, Mo, came down with an indictment of "NOT GUILTY" -- i.e., not enough evidence to warrant a jury trial -- against Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting and killing Michael Brown in self-defense after a robbery and altercation earlier this year, President Barack Obama casually sauntered onto national TV at 9 pm EST holding the crotch of his pants with one hand and urged the public to not riot in Ferguson Missouri, New York, Detroit, LA, San Francisco, Oakland, St Louis, Denver, San Diego, Miami, Washington DC, Boise Idaho and all major cities in America.

   "And don't throw no fire bombs, shoot any weapons, set cars on fire, smash windows, beat up innocent bystanders, or say anything nasty to the police, National Guard, or yo Momma," added the President.  "And brush your teeth before bed."

   "We are a nation of laws, not of racist tribalism," said President Obama as he uttered how every blind crack head in the streets with no forensic evidence, not having interviewed all the witnesses, and not knowing jack $hit about the Michael Brown Ferguson case, is "understandably upset, even angry," at the result of last night's non-indictment of police officer Darren Wilson, even though, by the way, happenchance, did I happen to mention, said Obama, that Darren Wilson is white and Michael Brown is black?  "This is not a case of racism, even though race had everything to do with it," said President Obama.  Wonderful Michael Brown, the perp victim, is black as the Ace of Spades, and the guilty police officer, no offense intended, was whiter than white on rice."

   "So," continued President Obama, speaking out of concern for peaceful demonstrations, "I do not want any of you clear-thinking, logical, rational, upstanding citizens in all the major cities of America at exactly 9 pm EST to throw any rocks at the police, shoot any weapons at the National Guard, or turn over and burn any automobiles such as that blue Honda in the parking lot over there or...  More...

Emperor Obama Issues Pink Slips to US Congress

Nov 21, 2014

Washington, DC -- In a sweeping gesture of Executive action, Emperor Obama issued pink slips to all 535 members of the US Congress.  100 US Senators and 435 US Representatives of what used to be the US Congress were terminated from their public service jobs last night as Emperor Obama stepped up to the podium in the Oval Office on national TV and summarily fired their asses.  “I have a pen, and I have a phone,” declared Emperor Obama as he issued his 1 millionth Executive Order which effectively dissolves the US Congress and thus all legislative power of that now defunct body.  Ipso facto, Emperor Obama has, therefore, dissolved the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the Federalist Papers since these documents no longer apply to the checks and balances and explicit duties of the previous three branches of government as stated in the now also defunct US Constitution.

    In addition to dissolving the US Congress, Emperor Obama, de facto, also dissolved the Judicial Branch of government since there is now no legislation for the US Supreme Court to adjudicate, i.e. determine whether said legislation is constitutional or not.

    A secondary implication of Emperor Obama’s issuance of pink slips to all 535 members of Congress is a pink slip for each of the previous United State’s 50 individual state governors who now sit unconstitutionally as heads of each state, there being no US Constitution and therefore no US states.  If there are no 50 individual states, then none of those states have legitimate state legislatures.  All the Senators and Representatives of New York, California, Idaho, Vermont, and the other 46 states have no constitutional functions any longer.  There is no longer a United States; there is only a North American continent -- with no borders.

    A third implication of dissolving the US Congress, all state legislatures and all state governors is that there is no longer any need for...  More...

Who Really Killed Osama bin Laden?

Nov 15, 2014

New York, NY -- Well lah dee dah and whoop tee doo.  Navy Seal Robert O'Neil is traipsing around the national TV talk show circuits such as Hannity Calamity, Greta van Suspect, William O'Reilly, and Jelly Bean Kelly telling everybody how it was HE who shot Liberty Valance, oops I mean Pancho Villa, no no make that Osama bin Laden.

   Where was Osama knocked off?  In some compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan on May 1, 2011 on a dark and stormy night.  Really?

   What about Navy Seal Matt Bissonnette -- interviewed by CBS 60 Minutes' host Scott Pelley -- who claimed he shot OBL "a handful of times" during the May 1, 2011 Zero Dark Thirty raid to knock off bin Laden in Whattabaddybody Abbottabad?  And after Navy Seal Matt shot this "somebody" -- because good old Matt said neither he or anybody else there recognized the dead duck as Osama bin Laden -- a second squad of Seals running up the stairs pumped a few more rounds into bin Laden.  You know, just to make sure.  Uh-huh.

   Was this second Navy Seal Robert O'Neil, who is now claiming that HE was the one who killed Osama bin Laden or was it another Navy Seal?  Who knows?  None of the Navy Seals knew Osama bin Laden from Abduhl the Camel Driver.

   So what we got here is at least two stories by Navy Seals trying to take credit for kicking Osama bin Laden's bucket.

   Meanwhile, President Obama and his administration made sure that there would be no proof given to the American public about whether OBL was actually killed in this daring and highly questionable raid or not.  Think about it for a minute:   More...

Is Sgt Bergdahl Obama's Last Hurrah?

June 08, 2014

Boise, ID -- Sgt Bowe Bergdahl deserted his US Army platoon in Afghanistan in 2009 and went AWOL.  For five years.   For you non-military individuals out there, that means he was Absent Without Leave, or absent without permission.  That also means he deserted his post in a hostile fire zone, aka during a war.  In plain English, that means that when it was time for him to stand watch to make sure the enemy -- in this case, the Taliban -- did not sneak into their platoon's encampment and blast everybody away, Sgt Bergdahl was missing.  When Sgt Bergdahl's squad leaders went to wake him up for guard duty, he was not there.  His rifle and flak vest were left on his bed and he only took a few items such as water and a compass.

  In an effort to find out what happened to him, Bergdahl's squad briefly searched their compound but could not find him.  Then they suited up, grabbed their weapons and started a search outside their perimeter. Was he captured by the Bad Guys or leave on his own volition?

  At the start of their search for Sgt Bergdahl, his squad ran into several Afghani school children who said they saw an American soldier crawling through the brush without a weapon and pointed in that direction.  The squad continued their search but finally gave up when they couldn't find him.

  From many discussions with the platoon members and Sgt Berdahl in the months before he disappeared, his comrades had long since concluded...  More...

Why I Do Not Like the Obamas

originally written Jan 5, 2013 by Mychal Massie in The Daily Rant

 Mar 2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck

Here's an African American journalist's opinion of the Obamas. These are his words not mine.  Even if you love Obama, you might take a few minutes to read this because it is unvarnished in its implications for them and our country. -- FM Duck

Los Angeles -- The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obamas. Specifically, I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obamas? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family pic."

The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.

I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no, I demand respect, for the Office of President, and a love of our country and her citizens from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love...  More...

So, Just How Bad Was This Super Bowl Rout, Historically Speaking?

By Kenley Young, FOX Sports – Feb 2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck

Note:  Super Bowl XLVIII  (48 in stupid Roman Numerals that nobody in the real world ever uses) (i.e., (-X+(L+V+I+I+I)), where L=50, X=10, minus 10 since it’s on the left side of bigger value L, ask the Romans, don’t ask me, V=5, I=1; Throw Roman Numerals out with the slide rule, OK?)

New York, NY -- Yes, the Denver Broncos looked bad out there on Sunday.  Really bad.  And yes, it was a rout of fairly epic proportions, the kind of lopsided affair we haven't seen in more than a decade.

But no, the 35-point shellacking was not exactly historic.

It wasn't even the biggest Super Bowl loss in Broncos history. The worst rout in Super Bowl history? That distinction goes to...  More...

      International News      

The Lost Century

by Egon von Greyerz, annotated by FM Duck

Jan 31, 2014

Zurich, Switzerland -- In November 1910, some powerful US bankers joined by the influential Paul Warburg had a meeting on Jekyll Island that would determine the destiny of the world financial system and the world economy for over 100 years. This infamous meeting led to the creation of the Federal Reserve System in the US on December 23, 1913.

The Fed was created by private bankers for the benefit of private bankers and today, 100 years later, they have been more successful than they could ever have imagined in 1913.

Not only have they created a system that efficiently controls the world financial system for their personal benefit but also world politics. They totally understood the advice of Mayer Amschel Rotschild, the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, who famously proclaimed:

“Give me control of the nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”

So for exactly 100 years now, the Fed and other central bankers have totally destroyed all major world currencies and left the world with debts that cannot and will not be repaid with normal money. And whilst achieving this unprecedented wealth creation for the top level of financiers, they have in the last 15 years...  More...

      National News      

The Magnificent Failure of ObamaCare

by Prof Gary North

Jan 06, 2013

From the point of view of a defender of liberty, ObamaCare is the most magnificent welfare state program of our generation.

Washington, DC -- Premium expenses are going up for most people. Deductibles are going up for most people. Cancellation letters are going out to millions of people. The number of people signing up is less than the number of people who have received policy-cancellation letters. In short, the costs are being front-loaded, and the benefits are being back-loaded.

Always before, welfare state politics has been based on a specific strategy: "Benefits first. Costs later." This is called front-loading and back-loading. The best examples of this process are Social Security and Medicare. The costs are now coming due for these two programs. According to Prof. Lawrence Kotlikoff, the back-loaded cost of the two programs is now in the range of $200 trillion, present value. But no one really cares. Those costs will be imposed in the future. Politicians care only about the immediate future, namely, the next election.

The politicians come to the general public, and they promise that the state will intervene on the side of the middle class. The state will do so also to help the poor. The costs will be borne exclusively by the rich. Politicians are careful never to define how much money...  More...

      International News      

"James Bond's dirty little spy secret: He's an alcoholic," says Dr. No research team from Nottingham University Hospitals in England

by Dennis Thompson, Health Day News Reporter

Annotated by FM Duck

Dec 14, 2013

What is the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying to "expose" that the bigger-than-life character of the James Bond spy novels was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim, nobody could really knock off Goldfinger or seduce Pussy Galore if they drank that much alcohol?  Really?  I suppose their next research task is to prove that Superman can't really fly, or leap tall buildings in a single bound, or run faster than a locomotive. -- FM Duck

Apparently the Nottingham research team has forgotten what the function of a novel or movie really is: to provide a means for individuals to experience their moral philosophy through identification with a bigger-than-life hero who is knocking off the "bad" -- solving problems -- to bring about "good."  Or, do the researchers have another objective in mind, such as destroying people's experience of identifying with a bigger-than-life hero in order to drag them back down to their dreary little lives in state collectivist Britain and America? -- FM Duck

In short, socialist states hate individualists such as James Bond because they are seen as threats to the collectivist ideology of the state.  It is not the supposed over-consumption of alcohol that the British socialist researchers dislike about James Bond; it is his individualistic attitude that is the basis for their concern because individualism is the basis for free market capitalism.  The last thing the socialist state wants is for its citizens to be hero-worshipping an individualist.  Hence, especially in a novel or movie that gets distributed to hundreds of millions of readers and movie-goers, the state propagandists want to prove that James Bond is just a drunken, impotent, bum.  The researchers' real objective:  Worship the state; not the individual. -- FM Duck

London, England --  Whoa, Holly Goodhead.  First, read the following "research" drivel about your favorite secret agent,  James Bond 007, and then we can look at what the Nottingham University researchers' real objective is in trying to disparage our favorite spy:

Say the "Dr. No" researchers at Nottingham University Hospitals:

Iconic spy character James Bond drinks so much and so often that in real life he'd be incapable of chasing down villains or wooing sexy vamps, a new study contends.

"The level of functioning as displayed in the books is inconsistent with the physical, mental and indeed sexual functioning expected from someone drinking this much alcohol," wrote a team led by Dr. Patrick Davies, of Nottingham University Hospitals, in England.

His team analyzed the famous spy's alcohol consumption and found that it was more than four times higher than the recommended intake for an adult male.

This puts Bond at high risk for several alcohol-related diseases -- including alcoholic liver disease, cirrhosis, impotence and alcohol-induced tremor. Because of his heavy drinking, the real 007 would have a life expectancy of 56, doctors say.

The alcohol-induced tremor may explain why Bond prefers his martinis "shaken, not stirred," the study authors joked. They added that the alcoholism-induced tremor in his hands means he's unlikely to be able to stir his drinks, even if he wants to.

Davies' group launched the study because they were struck by the fact that the amount of Bond's drinking in the original books seemed rather high. They wondered if he could actually carry out his missions and woo so many women at this level of drinking.

Based on a thorough reading of all of the books, the study authors concluded that Bond's average alcohol consumption was 92 units per week -- over four times the recommended amount. This figure excludes days when Bond was unable to drink.

A unit of alcohol is about 10 milliliters of pure alcohol -- about the same amount found in the average glass of scotch, bourbon or other hard liquor.

The spy's maximum daily alcohol intake was almost 50 units per day and he had only 12.5 alcohol-free days out of the 87.5 days he was able to drink, according to the findings in the Christmas edition of the journal BMJ.

Bond might even be a road hazard, since he frequently drank enough to put him over the legal limit before he climbed into his car.

Many studies have shown that people generally underestimate their alcohol consumption by about 30 percent, which means that Bond's alcohol consumption may be as high as 130 units per week, the study authors said.

It's clear that 007 needs help, the authors said. "We advise an immediate referral for further assessment and treatment [and] a reduction in alcohol consumption to safe levels," they concluded.

They also noted that excessive drinking is a global health problem that causes 2.5 million deaths a year. However, movies and other sources of entertainment often portray drinking in a positive, even glamorous, way.

Analysis by FM Duck:

How far has the welfare state of Britain gone when a team of researchers at Nottingham University Hospitals stooped to the level of claiming -- after supposedly "a thorough reading" of all the James Bond spy novels -- that fictional character James Bond consumed 90 drinks of alcohol a week (that's 13 drinks per day) and thus would be too drunk to perform all of his 007, secret agent, shoot 'em up, Pussy Galore activities for His Majesty's Secret Service?

What is the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying to "expose" that the bigger-than-life fictional character of the James Bond spy novels was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim, ...  More...

Nelson Mandela: In His Own Words

by Joseph Farah at WND Commentary

Dec 09, 2013

Washington, DC -- As world leaders offer false praise at the funeral of the supposedly peace-loving former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, let's read the following quotes directly from Mandela himself that you will not read in the international press:

1) “If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don’t care for human beings.”

2) “Long live the Cuban revolution. Long live comrade Fidel Castro … Cuban internationalists have done so much for African independence, freedom and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban revolution. We too want to control our destiny. … There can be no surrender. It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people.”

3) “[T]he people of Asia and Africa have seen through the slanderous campaign conducted by the USA against the socialist countries. They know that their independence is threatened not by any of the countries in the socialist camp but by the USA, who has surrounded their continent with military bases. The communist bogey is an American stunt to distract the attention of the people of Africa from the real issue facing them, namely, American imperialism.”

4) “Under a Communist Party government, South Africa will become a land of milk and honey. Political, economic and social rights will cease to be enjoyed by whites only. They will be shared equally by whites and non-whites. There will be enough land and houses for all. There will be no unemployment, starvation and disease. Workers will earn decent wages; transport will be cheap and education free.”

5) “Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of the Palestinian people.”

6) “The cause of communism is the greatest cause in the history of mankind!”

7) “Those who feel irritated by our friendship with President Khadafy can go jump in the pool.”

8) “There’s one place where (Fidel Castro’s) Cuba stands out head and shoulders above the rest – that is in its love...  More...

Nelson Mandela: Man of Peace or Terrorist Commie?

Dec 08, 2013

"The minutes from the 1982 SACP meeting (South African Communist Party), said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof [that Nelson Mandela was a member]. 'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he said."

"Worse yet, the ends in both cases (Mandela's and Obama's) are:  terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the Marxist ends are just as bad as the terrorist means."

Johannesburg, South Africa -- While the world heaps praises and weeps for the recent passing of Nelson Mandela, former leader of the revolt against South African apartheid, reporters Colin Freeman and Jane Flanagan for the British newspaper The Telegraph, reveal that:

"...research by a British historian, Professor Stephen Ellis, has unearthed fresh evidence that during his early years as an activist, Mr. Mandela did hold senior rank in the South African Communist Party, or SACP.  He says Mr. Mandela joined the SACP to enlist the help of the Communist superpowers for the ANC's campaign of armed resistance to white rule.  His book also provides fresh detail on how the ANC's military wing had bomb-making lessons from the IRA, and intelligence training from the East German Stasi, which it used to carry out brutal interrogations of suspected "spies" at secret prison camps.  The former South African president, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993, has always denied being a member of the South African branch of the movement, which mounted an armed campaign of guerrilla resistance along with the ANC.  As evidence of Mr. Mandela's Communist party membership, Prof Ellis cites minutes from a secret 1982 SACP meeting, discovered in a collection of private papers at the University of Cape Town, in which a veteran former party member, the late John Pule Motshabi, talks about how Mr. Mandela was a party member some two decades before.

"In the minutes, Mr. Motshabi, is quoted as saying: 'There was an accusation that we opposed allowing Nelson [Mandela] and Walter (Sisulu, a fellow activist) into the Family (a code word for the party) ... we were not informed because this was arising after the 1950 campaigns (a series of street protests). The recruitment of the two came after.'  While other SACP members have previously confirmed Mr. Mandela's party membership, many of their testimonies were given under duress in police interviews, where they might have sought to implicate him. However, the minutes from the 1982 SACP meeting, said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof. 'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he said.

So how are we to judge Nelson Mandela: a man of peace or a terrorist commie?

He fought against racial segregation in South Africa but enlisted the aid of Soviet Communists and IRA bomb makers to kill innocent people.  He associated with the terrorist organization ANC, the African National Congress -- which was officially listed as a terrorist group by the US Government during the Cold War of the1950's and 60's.  Both white and black innocent citizens were bombed, interrogated and tortured to death by Nelson Mandela's communist party.

It is rather hypocritical to only look at Mr. Mandela's peaceful actions against apartheid and dismiss the truth of his communist and terrorist actions, including the killing of thousands of innocent people.  This is reminiscent of our own President Barack Obama's close association with the terrorist group The Weather Underground whose leaders Bill Ayres and his wife Bernardine Dohrn were convicted of blowing up an American police station, other sites and buildings, and killing several people during their terrorist spree in the 1960's and 1970's.

The Weathermen grew out of the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) faction of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). It took its name from the lyric "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows", from the Bob Dylan song "Subterranean Homesick Blues."  "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows" was the title of a position paper they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding document called for a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other radical movements to achieve "the destruction of 'US imperialism' and achieve a classless world:  world communism."

Does anybody notice a social-political-economic trend here, by Nelson Mandela and Barack Obama?  Both men's moral philosophy leads to the horrors of state collectivism.

Nelson Mandela used the terrorism of his communist party against innocent people -- black and white -- to fight against racial segregation and implement Marxism.  For this, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993.  Barack Obama is using Marxist terrorism in the US today to fight for a one-world state collectivist government modeled after the teachings of Karl Marx.  For this, Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009.

Like Nelson Mandela, Barack's other close associations include state collectivist activists and terrorists such as Rev. Jeremiah Wright who screamed, "Not God Bless America... but God damn America," Louis Farrakhan of the fanatical Nation of Islam, and, more importantly for today, Obama's obvious supportive association with the Middle East's Muslim Brotherhood which includes Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other fanatical Muslim groups who are hell bent on a jihad against the "Great Satan," America, the "Little Satan," Israel, plus all Christians, Jews, Gays, Women, and everybody else they call "Infidels."

What is the Take Home Lesson of all of this?

What kind of moral philosophy allows one to play the role of a terrorist dictator either directly (Nelson Mandela) or indirectly (Barack Obama), be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, and pretend that their Marxist ends justify their terrorist means?  Answer:  State collectivism, whether it's fascism, socialism, or communism.

Worse yet, the ends in both cases (Mandela's and Obama's) are:  terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the Marxist ends are just as bad as the terrorist means.

Contrast this with the actions of the American Founding Fathers who fought for...  More...

      National News      

What Obama and I Learned at Columbia: How to Destroy America from Within

by Wayne Allyn root at The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck

Nov 12, 2013

"America's decline under Obama isn't due to mistake, ignorance, or incompetence." -- Wayne Allyn Root

"By the time the Middle Class realizes he's the killer and they're the prey, they'll already be dead." -- Wayne Allyn Root

Las Vegas, NV -- Remember when Geraldo opened Al Capone’s vault live on national TV? Well I’m about to solve the mystery of Obama. I’m about to break “the Obama code.” I’m about to tell you everything about the way Obama, and the people around him, really think. I’m about to rip open the true Obama plan to destroy our country. Because I was there when the plan was hatched.

How do I know all this? Because I was Barack Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. I was easy to recognize – the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was “Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at the corner of Marx Blvd. and Lenin Drive.

I’m only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were not far off.  [Note:  same for FM Duck, the Lone Libertarian, who attended a similar experience at UC Berkeley in the 1970s.]

Everyone needs to hear my story because what Obama and I learned at Columbia explains EXACTLY what Obama is doing to America today.

The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs; the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners; the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability, and now free health care.

It’s all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I learned at Columbia.

America’s decline under Obama isn’t due to mistake, ignorance, or incompetence at the hands of a community organizer. It’s a purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to...  More...

The Big Cover Up -- Why Obama Really Wants to go to War in Syria

by Wayne Allyn root at The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck

Sep 13, 2013

Las Vegas, NV -- Let’s take an honest look at what Obama is doing to black Americans and his own most loyal supporters. It is, in a word…unimaginable.

It all starts with Syria. Why Syria? Why now? Until Russia interceded, going to war in Syria seemed the most important thing in the world to Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry. They seemed DESPERATE to go to war, at any costs.

But why? Syria has nothing to do with us. They are not threatening us. Their own war is a civil war with no “good guys.” How does America benefit from a war with Syria? Why did Obama suddenly decide a “red line” has been crossed, when there are “red lines” all over the world- including the killing of Christians and the burning of 71 Christian churches in Egypt. Why is it so important to risk American lives to defend the Syrian rebels- who are partners with Al Qaeda, America’s sworn enemy? We didn’t go to war to avenge the murder of our own citizens at Benghazi, so why would we go to war to avenge Al Qaeda deaths in Syria? None of this makes any sense at all.

Until you realize it’s a massive cover-up. Obama’s WMD- Weapon of Mass Distraction. Obama is desperate to cover-up the facts about his dying economy and the damage he’s done to his own most loyal voters. Obama has destroyed the lives of the very people who consider him “the American Idol.”How bad is Obama’s economy? Forget the 7.3 percent unemployment rate that is reported by the government. That’s pure fraud and propaganda. That figure goes down only because hundreds of thousands of Americans drop out of the workforce. In other words, if you stop looking for work, and go on food stamps and welfare, Obama says the unemployment number just got better!

The only truth about unemployment is found in the Labor Force Participation Rate of 63 percent. That’s the lowest in four decades. For men it’s the lowest since record-keeping began in the 1940’s. What this means is 37 percent of the able-bodied, working age adults in America are not only not working, they’ve given up looking for work.

Even worse, a unimaginable percentage of those who are employed have only part-time jobs. Seventy-seven percent of the new jobs created since January 1st are part-time jobs. That’s not good folks.  Studies show 1-in-4 part-time workers live in poverty, while only 1-in-20 full-time workers live in poverty. So millions of Americans under Obama who show up as “employed” are merely working their way towards poverty. And millions of others who have full-time jobs are working at McDonalds, or working as waiters, or bartenders, or janitors. Those are the only jobs left under Obama. The middle class is being slaughtered.

Here are the two most ironic points about this slow-motion train wreck called the Obama economy:  More...

Is Obama Purposely Trying to Start WW III?

by Wayne Allyn root, annotated by FM Duck

Aug 29, 2013

Las Vegas, NV -- Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Two things are happening right now under President Barack Obama that are unprecedented.

First, Obama is about to go to war in Syria and risk your sons’ and daughters’ lives on behalf of our enemy, al-Qaida. Second, he is about to risk starting World War III.

Are you on board?

And then there’s Obama’s “red line.” Obama’s defenders say, “Syria passed the red line. We have no choice.” Really? So we now call extremist Muslims killing other extremist Muslims a “red line” that demands U.S. intervention. But extremist Muslims in Egypt burning more than 70 churches to the ground and killing Christians is not a “red line?” In one place (Syria), we want to go to war. In the other (Egypt), we continue to send billions of dollars in foreign aid as a reward for killing Christians.

Do you support Obama’s definition of a “red line?” I know I don’t.

So why the rush to war? Could it be because America’s unemployment problem under Obama is unfixable? Ninety million working-age Americans are not working. The labor force participation rate is the lowest for men since 1947 (since measurement began). Obama has no way out.

The same holds true for our partners in the European Union like the United Kingdom and France. Unemployment for the EU region is 12.1 percent, the worst in history. Almost 20 million Europeans are unemployed. Youth unemployment in the EU is just below 25 percent.

How do you solve such a human psychological disaster? You go to war.

Voilà. Suddenly, young people with no job prospects have a job — in the military. They have a check, a place to live, something to do. They no longer have time to commit crimes or riot in the streets.

America got out of the last Great Depression with the help of World War II. How convenient that Obama lit the fuse for the Arab Spring, helped to topple dictators friendly to U.S. interests and took the side of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, it’s all coming home to roost.

We fomented instability, supported the radicals who hate America and Israel, and...  More...

Barack Obama Illegally Changes ACA, Like Nixon

by George Will, annotated by FM Duck

Aug 18, 2013

Washington, DC -- Barack Obama's increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency. 

Desperation fuels arrogance as, barely 200 days into the 1,462 days of his second term, his pantry of excuses for failure is bare, his domestic agenda is nonexistent and his foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and redlines is floundering. And at last week's news conference he offered inconvenience as a justification for illegality.

Explaining his decision to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act, he said: "I didn't simply choose to" ignore the statutory requirement for beginning in 2014 the employer mandate to provide employees with healthcare. No, "this was in consultation with businesses."  [FM Duck Note:  Really?  Businesses?  Which businesses qualify to help justify Obama's breaking of the law?  Can Obama change any provisions or paragraphs of any ol' law he feels like?  From where does he obtain this authority to trash the checks and balances between the three branches of government.  Certainly not from his contract with the American people, namely the US Constitution.]

He continued: "In a normal political environment, it would have been easier for me to simply call up the speaker and say, you know what, this is a tweak that doesn't go to the essence of the law . . . it looks like there may be some better ways to do this, let's make a technical change to the law. That would be the normal thing that I would prefer to do. But we're not in a normal atmosphere around here when it comes to Obamacare. We did have the executive authority to do so, and we did so."

Serving as props in the scripted charade of White House news conferences, journalists did not ask the pertinent question: ...  More...

Hit the Road Barack, I Too Have Become Disillusioned

by Matt Patterson, Newsweek, annotated by FM Duck

(Written Aug 22, 2012, that's right, 2012, not today: July 17, 2013)

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek unload on Obama. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

"Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years," says left Liberal Matt Patterson of Newsweek.  Wow, even the Liberals have now figured it out. -- FM Duck

Unfortunately, it is now 2013 and President Barack Obama has been re-elected for another 4 years.  If Obama is not the Pied Piper of America, leading America's youth down the path to serfdom, I don't know who is.  So much for even the left Liberal news rag Newsweek's influence on the typical American voter. -- FM Duck

Washington, DC -- Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?  [FM Duck Note:  From a Libertarian point of view, it is not the President's function to try to "manage" the economy.  That's socialism.  It is, however, the President's job to work with Congress to dump all the state collectivist legislation that has piled up over the last umpteen hundred years and get back to a limited government, free market economy.  Obama has, in fact, worsened this problem as he has intervened more into the market -- thus into individuals' rights and freedoms -- than any other American President except perhaps FDR and Woodrow Wilson.]

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?  [FM Duck Note:  Easy peezy, lemon squeazy:  as Ayn Ran would have said, he obtained the sanction of his altruistic state collectivist victims.]

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama.  [FM Duck Note:  Because that is exactly what American "intellectuals" have taught Americans to do to themselves.] True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia [if he really attended Columbia since nobody there, from students to professors, remember him] despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and...  More...

Obama's New Idea:  Spending $7 Billion of our Tax Money on Electric Soccer Balls for Africa 

by Chicks on The Right, annotated by FM Duck

(July 02, 2013)

This week, Obama's decided to take $7 Billion of our hard-earned money and give it to Africa -- in the form of electric soccer balls.

"We’re going to start by investing $7 billion in U.S. government resources.  ...that's what opportunity looks like."  -- Barack Obama

"No, that's what state collectivism, socialism, and robbery of the American people looks like." -- FM Duck

That Obama. He's one innovative dude.

With other people's money.

This week, Obama's decided to take $7 Billion of our hard-earned money and give it to Africa - in the form of electric soccer balls. They're called "socket balls," specifically, and they were created by two chicks at Harvard (natch). And Dear Leader plans on powering Africa with these soccer balls that carry electric generators inside of them. No lie. Basically, as kids kick them around all day long, "it generates electricity and stores it in a battery." And then those kids can go home and plug something into the ball, like a phone or a lamp or a hair dryer, or whatever.

From the White House transcript of Obama's speech from yesterday:

"I am proud to announce a new initiative. We’ve been dealing with agriculture, we’ve been dealing with health. Now we’re going to talk about power -- Power Africa -- a new initiative that will...  More...

Bombshell:  Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says Birth Certificate is 100% Fraud 

by Tim Brown at Freedom Outpost

(Jun 09, 2013)

“The answer is, because I am very close to proving Obama to be a criminal, who absolutely has to be removed from the White House and send (sic) to prison.” -- Attorney Orly Taitz

Reed Hayes is a court qualified handwriting and document examiner whose business is located in Honolulu, Hawaii. He has nearly 40 years of handwriting related experience, and has worked as an international consultant and speaker. Never heard of him? Well, Hayes is the Certified Document Examiner (CDE) who produced the 40 page opinion referenced in the Mike Zullo affidavit that was submitted to the Alabama Supreme Court in the Obama eligibility case and his report concluded that the Obama birth certificate image, located at is a complete fabrication.

PPSimmons reports:

The rabid followers of the “O” (Obots) have rushed to denounce Reed Hayes as a “quack.” However, one might be surprised to learn that one of Hayes’ clients listed in the Expert Witness Directory at this link is an attorney with Perkins-Coie Law Firm.

Perkins – Coie is the law practice whose partners have provided Obama’s personal defense against all birth certificate and natural born citizen litigation over the past five years. Hmmmmm. Very interesting indeed.

If it turns out that Sheriff Arpaio is successful in getting Congress to investigate the authenticity of Obama’s BC, the Perkins-Coie legal team, who will be defending Obama, will be hard pressed to simply dismiss Reed Hayes as a “quack.” This fact will be especially significant now that it is a revealed and proven truth that members of the Perkins – Coie firm have used Hayes as an expert witness! Their own prior cases, where Hayes was used as a witness, would be severely compromised if they use Saul Alinski-styled mocking attacks on Hayes.

It has been reported that Mr. Hayes has been hounded by Obama operatives to discover the details of his 40-page forensic analysis of the Obama pdf birth certificate. He has been referring them to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, who now legally own his report, for further information.

I also found it interesting that someone sided with the Obama administration and attempted to bring up dirt on Hayes by pointing out...  More...

Barack Obama:  The Ghost of Columbia University... and then some 

by Wayne Allyn Root

(Jun 07, 2013)

Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative Republican. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee.

There is something more than just "rotten" in all of the "information" -- or lack thereof -- about Barack Obama coming out of nowhere, studying nowhere, and becoming President of the United States.  The bigger question is:  who, or what group, has created this "Nowhere Man" -- as the Beatles' song indicates -- who knows nothing, came from nowhere, but seems to be carrying out somebody else's social-political-and economic agenda?  One may claim that that would smack of claiming a "conspiracy theory" against the American people.  But let's remember the dictionary definition of the term "conspiracy:"  From the word "conspire," to agree together, esp. secretly, to do something wrong, evil, or illegal... to act or work together toward the same goal... to plot together toward the same evil or illegal goal.  And thus the definition of the term "conspiracy:"  the act of conspiring... an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; a plot.  Conspiracies have occurred all throughout history.  Conspiracies occur every day in business, politics, and everywhere.  It is only Liberal politicians who have recently tried to redefine the term "conspiracy" to mean "untruth" in order to answer unanswerable questions (by them) in a debate or discussion.  That doesn't make real conspiracies not true.  It just means that Liberal politicians don't have -- or are part of the "conspiracy" themselves -- answers to the conspiracy that is being discussed.  Until a conspiracy is proven to be true, it is just a theory, a conspiracy theory.  But after it is proven to be true, it still remains as a real conspiracy that occurred.  The upshot question is:  are we in the middle of a conspiracy theory with somebody, or group, playing President Obama like a puppet for some nefarious reasons?  Something truly smells more "rotten" than just Obama's non-attendance at Columbia University and its cover up.  Add to that the fact that Obama's birth certificate appears to be bogus, too, and that he is guiding the US into a social-political-economic debacle that will bankrupt the American and global economy from which known groups (i.e. central bankers, the military industrial complex, and other groups in Obama's pocket) stand to rake in billions of dollars, and it is not far-fetched to claim that a real conspiracy between these groups does indeed exist. -- FM Duck

Other conspiracies have existed in US history, too.  The first Moon landing in 1969 was allegedly hoaxed by the JFK administration so we could beat the Soviets to a moon landing as we promised the American public.  All subsequent landings, however -- according to reliable sources -- were true and did occur as reported.  When JFK was contemplating issuing an Executive Order to stop the Federal Reserve from printing Fed Reserve Notes and going back to using gold and silver backed currency, he was mysteriously executed in Dallas and this was blamed on a Lee Harvey Oswald who was then mysteriously shot by a man who just walked in with the news media while Oswald was being escorted to jail.  How convenient and lax security at the sheriff's office.  Vice President Lynden Johnson then took over and continued the bankers' war in Vietnam and Federal Reserve Notes continued to be printed.  To this day, we have had nothing but perpetual boogie men set up as "terrorists" or "bad guys" for the US public to fear so the central bankers and OPEC oil ministers can continue with their Petro Dollar Deal in the Mid-East.  President Barack Obama may stupidly believe in the Marxist fairytales he proposes and is trying to implement through programs such as a national health care joke but he nevertheless did not get to become and remain as President of the United States without a little help from a group that is acting or working together toward an evil, unlawful, treacherous and surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons.  Namely, it's a freaking plot.  And now that he's used the IRS to target his "enemies" -- conservatives, Tea Party activists, and AP news journalists -- he is gathering all of your private phone and email communications to use -- not for "national security" -- but rather against YOU in the near future.  Look who he just appointed as Director for the National Security Agency:  former UN Ambassador Susan Rice who ran around to all the major TV talk shows to lie about an anti-Allah video produced by some Bozo in Hollywood as the reason for the terrorist murders of four Americans, including our Ambassador, at our Benghazi Consulate.  Just when we were about to learn that Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton were running guns and missiles to Al Queda by mistake and were trying to buy them back.  Wow.  Just a coincidence?  Not part of a bigger conspiracy that Obama is involved in?  Yeah, right...  And I got a Golden Gate Bridge you can buy in San Francisco for five bucks...  Uh huh... -- FM Duck

So, let's look at the bigger picture vis a vis the probable existence of a huge "conspiracy theory" -- a real one, not the fake definition of "conspiracy theory" by the left Liberals -- while reading the following from alumnus Wayne Allyn Root, a former Columbia University classmate of President Barack Obama -- that is, if Obama actually did attend Columbia University.  (Cough-cough, not likely.) -- FM Duck

Washington, DC -- I (Wayne Allyn Root) just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates. Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual - he wasn’t there. Not even a video greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse, no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States is the ghost of Columbia University.

I’m certainly no “Johnny come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should be asking...  More...

IRS Employee:  D.C. Told Us to Target Tea Party 

by Kerry Picket at Breitbart News

(Jun 02, 2013)

IRS Director met with Somebody at the White House 157 times in one year.  Remember, one does not just show up to the White House unannounced for 157 Easter Egg Hunts.  The White House INVITES you to show up, you don't just show up on your own.  So the Big Question is:  WHO at the White House INVITED the IRS Director to show up and for what purpose?  It wasn't some junior staff member who felt like babbling to the IRS Director just for fun.  The only plausible answer is that it was either the Head Honcho himself, Barack Obama, or a group created by him, in order to make plans on how to target Tea Party and other Conservative groups RE denying them tax exemptions while readily granting such exemptions to Democratic groups, AND, to make plans on how to use the IRS to confiscate AP journalists' personal and professional communications in a witch hunt allegedly for "National Security" ha ha "National Security" purposes.  And US AG Eric Holder was up to his eyebrows in this type of targeted behavior. -- FM duck

And the IRS is THE BUREAUCRACY scheduled to enforce Obamacare?  Are we crazy?  That's like Adolph Hitler using the Brown Shirts to enforce national health care in The Third Reich.  Oh well... I guess he did; Welcome to Obamacare in the Third Reich. -- FM Duck

Washington, DC -- House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) revealed new testimony from IRS employees on CNN's State of The Union on Sunday. According to transcribed excerpts released by the Committee, a Cincinnati IRS employee made it clear they were told by Washington, D.C. personnel to give extra scrutiny to Tea Party groups:

Q: In early 2010, was there a time when you became aware of applications that referenced Tea Party or other conservative groups?

A: In March of 2010, I was made aware.

Q: Okay. Now, was there a point around this time period when [your supervisor] asked you to do a search for similar applications?

A: Yes.

Q: To the best of your recollection, when was this request made?

A: Sometime in early March of 2010.

Q: Did [your supervisor] give you any indication of the need for the search, any more context?

A: He told me that Washington, D.C., wanted some cases.

Q: So as of April 2010, these 40 cases were held at that moment in your group; is that right?

A: Some were.

Q: How many were held there?

A: Less than 40. Some went to Washington, D.C.

Q: Okay. How many went to Washington, D.C.?

A: I sent seven.

Q: So you prepared seven hard copy versions of the applications to go to Washington, D.C.?

A: Correct.

Q: Did he give you any sort of indication as to why he requested you to do that?


A: He said Washington, D.C. wanted seven. Because at one point I believe I heard they were thinking 10, but it came down to seven. I said okay, seven.

Q: How did you decide which seven were sent?

A: Just the first seven.

Q: The first seven to come into the system?

A: Yes.

Q: Did anyone else ever make a request that you send any cases to Washington?

A: [Different IRS employee] wanted to have two cases that she couldn't -- Washington, D.C. wanted them, but she couldn't find the paper. So she requested me, through an email, to find these cases for her and to send them to Washington, D.C.

Q: When was this, what time frame?

A: I don't recall the time frame, maybe May of 2010.

Q: But just to be clear, she told you the specific names of these applicants.

A: Yes.

Q: And she told you that Washington, D.C. had requested these two specific applications be sent to D.C.

A: Yes, or parts of them.

Q: Okay. So she asked you to send particular parts of these applications.

A: Mm-hmm.

Q: And that was unusual. Did you say that?

A: Yes.

Q: And she indicated that Washington had requested these specific parts of these specific applications; is that right?  More...

Abolish the IRS -- and the Income Tax with It 

by Sheldon Richman at Project to Restore America (Annotations by FM Duck)

(May 29, 2013)

[Note by FM Duck:  It was not coincidental that the Internal Revenue Service was created circa 1913-14, the same time that the Federal Reserve system was created.  The same individuals who concocted our national central bank, The Federal Reserve, wanted to create an enforcement agency in the government to make sure they could enforce repayment of all future annual national debts/deficits that the central bank planned on creating.  That enforcement agency was the IRS and the bankers who created the IRS gave it -- or at least provided for it to easily obtain in the future -- powers far in excess of what the US Constitution allowed.  The Federal Reserve is not just a friendly bank that exists to provide a wonderful financial system for the US.  It is a private consortium of the major bankers in the US who have illegally tricked the dummies in Congress into providing a method by which the bankers can rob the people of their monetary value while giving Congress the ability to spend as much deficit money as they want as a method to obtain votes.  The root of all the financial problems in the US, plus the financing of many wars around the globe, can be directly traced to the existence of our central bank AND the European Central Bank (ECB).  The Petro Dollar Deal between the Federal Reserve and the OPEC oil ministers is the direct cause of most of the unrest and the perpetual wars in the Middle East and it would not be stretching the truth to claim that the current jihad terrorism is directly related the the actions of the world's central banks.  Both Republicans and Democrats are responsible for allowing the Federal Reserve AND its enforcement agency, the IRS, to perform all the dirty deeds that have occurred over the last 100 years of both agencies' existence.  The fact that President Obama and his administration is now caught up in the same type of IRS harassment issues that many former presidents have used the IRS for should not come as a surprise to anybody.  Nobody at the IRS needs to be fired or sent to jail.  Rather, both agencies -- the IRS and the Federal Reserve -- need to be abolished.  There are better ways to fund what little the US government should be spending tax money on and we absolutely do not need the IRS to become part of a national socialist health care system, that's for damn sure.]

Washington, DC -- The Internal Revenue Service has been caught engaging in political profiling while processing applications for tax-exempt status. In this case it was against organizations with "tea-party" or "patriot " in their names and other right-wing groups. Next time it could be libertarian or left-wing antiwar and pro-civil-liberties groups. No dissenter can ever rest assured he is safe from the arbitrary power of the IRS.

Nothing will have been learned from this scandal if all that happens is the firing of some IRS administrators and the issuance of new guidelines on 501(c)(4) applications. That is not nearly enough.

Obviously, tax exemptions exist only because individuals and some organizations are subject to income and other forms of taxation. Congress levies a tax on incomes, then in its "wisdom" chooses to exempt certain activities but not others. This is social engineering, with Congress seeking to encourage some kinds of organizations — while not forgoing more revenue than necessary. The IRS then writes rules to carry out the directions of Congress.

Where possible, people will naturally strive to qualify for exemption by pushing the boundaries...  More...

New Benghazi Whistleblowers: Stevens Was Involved in Buyback of Stinger Missiles from Al Qaeda 

by Tim Brown at Freedom Outpost (Summary annotation by FM tl)

(May 23, 2013)

Summary Rehash:

President Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton were, according to new whistleblower sources, running an international 'Fast and Furious' gun trade with (unwittingly, e.g. just like what happened with the drug lords in Mexico) Al Qaeda terrorists.

Ambassador Stevens promised Sec of State Hillary Clinton that he would help her buy back Stinger Missiles from insurgents after Hillary and Obama discovered the insurgents to whom they sold the missiles were not freedom fighters but rather Al Qaeda jihadists.  Stevens promised to make the Benghazi outpost "permanent" vs. "temporary" but was knocked off by the same Al Qaeda terrorists from whom he, Obama, and Hillary were attempting to recoup the missiles.

While this mess was a State Dept mess, President Obama was the only one who could tell the military to "stand down" and not send troops to Benghazi to save Ambassador Stevens.  Hillary played along with this game.

General Carter Ham, in command of US Africa Command (AFRICOM) was ordered not to act to save Ambassador Stevens.  That order, according to CIA Director General David Patraeus, must come from President Barack Obama, as Commander in Chief.  Patraeus knew the Benghazi raid was done by terrorists and said so, but to shut him up the Obama Administration spilled the beans about Patraeus' adulterous relationship with his biographer Paula Broadwell.

In order to cover all this crap up, President Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton concocted the Terrorist Fake Movie Fairytale and sent storyteller UN Ambassador Susan Rice to all the Sunday morning TV talk shows to spread this lie, which has since been uncovered and revealed on all national news media outlets.

Meanwhile, some poor Hollywood schmuck "movie producer" sits rotting in jail after being arrested by the Obama Administration on bogus charges of initiating the Benghazi raid on our consulate with a YouTube video bashing Allah.  And poor little Hillary hugged the wives of the dead consulate workers while blaming it all on the "movie."  Plus, poor bedraggled Hillary screamed to the Congressional Investigative Panel words to the effect, "Who gives a crap what really happened at this point, since they're all dead!"

Guess what, Hilly?  We do.  And you just lied to Congress, bitch.

Washington, DC -- More Benghazi whistleblowers are coming forward according to two former U.S. diplomats. According to the former diplomats, these whistleblowers are obtaining legal counsel because they are not protected by whistleblower laws in the areas that they work in.

PJMedia is reporting of an interview with these diplomats:

The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.

Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.

Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate...  More...


Only Obama Could Have Ordered 'Stand Down Call' On Benghazi

by AWR Hawkins at Breitbart News

(May 09, 2013)

Washington, DC -- A source with intimate information about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S. Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.

According to the source, when the attack on the Consulate occurred, a specific chain of command to gain verbal permission to move special-forces in must have occurred. SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant Col. Gibson would have contacted...  More...

Picture of 'Martial Law' Alarms Forensic Profiler

by Bob Unruh

(Mar 25, 2013)

Washington, DC -- A forensic profiler who worked on the disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the double-murder case against O.J. Simpson says he is becoming alarmed by some of the references President Obama is using.

Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who wrote "The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret fury," previously said Obama's statement "I am not a dictator" actualy meant, "I am the dictator president."

Hodges also concluded Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.

On Hodges's website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”

“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.

Hodges is not new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded Simpson’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.

In his newest analysis, he looks further into Obama’s statements in his press conference about the sequester issue in which he berated Republicans for not doing what he wants.

Hodges said “another spontaneous image” appeared from Obama’s “super intelligence.”

“Asked whether he couldn’t have pushed negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, ‘I can’t have Secret Service block the doorway,’” Hodges explained

“He suggests the secret wish to block the Republicans from the door to the government. Failing to negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush Republicans to gain total control of the government after the 2014 election. His ‘have Secret Service’ image further suggests a desire to totally control major government law enforcement agencies– to block any opposition,” Hodges said.

“The frightening image ‘of blocking the doorway’ to those who oppose him suggests progressively ideas of imprisonment/forced containment, and a picture of martial law. Extreme? Likely so for now but equally a potential major warning of his true intent – if everything fell into place,” he said.

But Hodges noted objective actions that fit the pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition, the estimated 145,000 federal agents with firearm- carry authority and the 65,000 agents for the Department of Homeland Security alone.

Then, he said, there’s the report that a Minnesota company was selling to the federal government cutout targets “designed to ‘desensitize police’ to ‘nontraditional threat targets.”

The targets included pregnant women, children, older people and other civilians in neighborhood settings – all holding guns. The company reported law enforcement designed and ordered the targets.

“In your wildest imagination, who in law enforcement needs desensitization to such targets?

Hodges noted that even activists on the left have expressed concern. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio interview with host Aaron Klein, called the potential abuse by the Obama administration’s huge domestic police power “extremely troubling.”

“Recall Obama’s earlier words which, importantly, he made spontaneously, strongly pointing toward an unconscious confession. ‘We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military].’

“What exactly was he thinking and why?  More...

Obama, Congress Must Reach Deal On budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then April 20, And Then April 28, And then May 1

And Then Twice A Week For Next Four Years

by The Onion

(Mar 11, 2013)

Washington, DC -- With the dramatic, across-the-board sequestration scheduled to occur this week, the nation’s leading economists have warned that President Obama and Congress must come to a compromise on the budget by Mar. 1, and then again by Apr. 1, and then Apr. 20, Apr. 28, and—after Congress is once again unable to come to a comprehensive agreement to fully stabilize the economy—May 1, along with agreements twice a week, every week, for the next four years.

Experts say that without reaching a deal this Friday, the automatic $85 billion reduction in government spending will immediately slow the U.S. economy and impact thousands of middle-class citizens. Officials said the same exact thing will happen next month, the month after that, and the month after that if Obama and Congress fail to meet deadlines created by the preceding, incomplete deals.

“If the president and Congress are unable to reach a grand bargain by Mar. 1, what they will likely do is reach a set of 100 or so smaller bargains, all with their own deadlines, and all of which could potentially plunge the U.S. economy into a recession,” said Princeton economics professor Marshall Kahn. “So, the Mar. 1 deadline is absolutely crucial. Just like the one next month will be. And the 12 deadlines in May. And the bi-daily deadlines that will kick in during the summer.”

“Based on the way the president and Congress deal with one another,” Kahn added, “in 2014, there will need to be 4,562 budget deals.”

According to leading economists, should negotiations between Obama and lawmakers stall this week, Congress could vote on a resolution to extend the current deadline to May 1, which would likely cause vital cuts to public programs, and also combine the projected negotiations scheduled for May 30, June 4, June 5, July 8, 2014, and Mar. 12, 2042 into one seven-day-long meeting.

Other experts noted that even in the event of a deal, a clause in the Budget Control Act would inevitably lead to a total of 64 additional meetings between June and July, as well as a potential deadline creation deadline that would automatically kick in on Oct. 4 and would create 20 more deadlines that...  More...

The Sequester 'Crisis' and What Should Be Done

by former US Rep Ron Paul

(Mar 06, 2013)

Washington, DC -- Despite what the media and politicians would have us believe, the United States did not collapse last Friday when the package of spending reductions known as “sequestration” went into effect. The financial markets hardly blinked, as they have come to be more skeptical about these periodic government-hyped “crises.”

What had been portrayed as a drastic reduction in government spending was merely a decrease in the projected rate of increase in government spending over the next decade. Under sequestration, government spending increases by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years rather than $2.5 trillion without it.

So we are speeding toward collapse at only 100 miles per hour instead of 110 miles per hour.

Some in Congress are using the panic over sequestration to justify another surrender of legislative authority to the executive branch. These members want to “pass the buck” on prioritizing federal programs by giving the president, cabinet officials, and high-level bureaucrats authority to set spending priorities. However, it is Congress’s job to set priorities in federal spending.

The drafters of the Constitution give the legislature the authority over spending because they recognized it was a threat to liberty to allow this power to be concentrated in the executive branch. Congress’s willingness to cede more authority to the executive should be opposed by everyone who values liberty and limited government.

Some of the loudest objections to sequestration have come from the champions of the military-industrial complex. Yet under sequestration defense spending will still increase by 18 percent over 10 years as opposed to 20 percent without sequestration.

There are claims that the military will face a...  More...

      International News      

Our World Balances On a Sea of Debt

Mar 06, 2010

Re-issued Feb 05, 2013
Darius Guppy

“The banks that control the world’s supply of money are no better than counterfeiters – and their systems of juggling debt have left the global economy teetering on the brink of ruin.” -- Darius Guppy, convicted Dutch counterfeiter

The following article aptly describes how fractional reserve banking is simply another form of counterfeiting, pointing out the conceptual difference between (1) real money and (2) a paper receipt for real money.  Then as the counterfeiting by fractional reserve bankers grows exponentially, as it must, the central bankers – witness former Federal Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan as he embraces the erroneous concept that he can impute value to paper money per se -- start believing in their own monetary lies and create even more complicated counterfeit investment vehicles backed by nothing but hot air, such as fake mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations based upon non-collateralized future daydreams, and then gambling pieces of paper called Credit Default Swaps whose clever function consists of betting against the previously-created fractional reserve derivatives.  That’s like a counterfeiter soliciting bets that the cops will soon catch him at his counterfeiting activities, in order to mitigate his losses.  So, the investment bankers at Goldman Sachs who sit on the board of Governors of the Fed Reserve sell fractional reserve hedge fund derivatives to clients while down the hall they short their clients’ very same hedge funds with Credit Default Swaps, betting that their hedge funds will fail.  That’s worse than prostitutes who only make their money going in; the bankers make their money both going in and pulling it , continues until they can’t keep it up any longer and the market crashes and burns.  Not to worry.  It’s called a Recession, then a Depression as everybody points fingers at everybody else and the bankers blame it on a “systemic risk,” or the U.S. Congress who is also participating in this monetary gang bang, or the vagaries of a non-existent free market capitalism, or a mysterious virus from Mars. – FM Duck

“If I could counterfeit the Pink Slip to my ’57 Chevy and sell a million copies to the suckers in my neighborhood for $1,000 each, while replacing the words ’This is to Certify that There Exists One ’57 Chevy on Deposit at FM Duck’s Warehouse Payable to the Bearer of This Note on Demand’ to ’Virtual Non-Existent Car,’ I could make a fortune.  And that’s exactly what the Federal Reserve is doing with fractional reserve banking of the U.S. Dollar and going off the gold standard.” – FM Duck

Netherlands, Europe – In 1994, there resided in the cell next to mine a certain “Tommy”. He had been imprisoned for counterfeiting Dutch Guilders to such a high standard that he had fooled the banks themselves.

   As was customary among prisoners who became friends, Tommy allowed me to read his legal papers and I became fascinated by the judge’s sentencing speech, the gist of which was that his activities had been parasitical. By creating money out of thin air he had reduced the purchasing power of more deserving members of society. What would happen if everyone behaved like him?

   I thought of arguments used, in a different context, regarding inflation. Like counterfeiting, it dilutes the value of the community’s wealth and constitutes a social evil. Creating too much money – “real” or “fake” – can wreck an economy. Such was the Nazis’ reasoning when they planned to ruin Britain’s economy by flooding the country with near-perfect counterfeit bills.

   A lot of nonsense has been written about the world’s current economic woes – about how the crash is the fault solely of the banks and, by implication, governments are blameless; and how it could all have been avoided, and can be put right, by greater financial regulation.

   It is a classic example of what the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre terms “the fallacy of managerial expertise”: an attempt by “experts” to blind us with science to justify their overpaid existences and mask their confusion. After all, not one of them was able to predict the current debacle.

   These “experts” will tell you that the present difficulties are simply the result of abuses and excesses in a system that is basically sound. All that is required is for some faults to be corrected. Do not believe them. The reality is that the problem is systemic and a little tinkering here or there will achieve nothing in the long term.

   What is needed is a root-and-branch re‑evaluation of that most curious of cultural inventions, money: how it is created, how it circulates, and how it can best be used to serve the interests of the community.

   To begin, the experts must explain in the simplest terms how money actually works. Were one to ask the man on the street – or, indeed, most politicians and bankers – who creates the money that rules our lives they would reply “the State”. They would be wrong. It is true that governments create legal tender – the physical notes and coins that circulate in an economy – but that represents, at its highest, only 3 per cent of the total money in circulation in the global economy. It is the commercial banks, largely unaccountable and privately owned, that create the world’s money.

   Indeed, even if Tommy were responsible for printing every note in circulation throughout the world his power to dilute the rest of our wealth would amount to only a tiny fraction of that of the real manufacturers of money. His activities and the activities of the bankers are, in essence, identical: the creation of money out of nothing.

   Without knowing it, therefore, Tommy’s judge punished him for usurping not so much the role of the State as the role of the banks. The same mistake – the mis-identification of where money truly originates – has been made by virtually all of our politicians, economists and financial commentators.

   Consider the contradiction at the heart of neo-liberal, monetarist economics that has constituted the Western orthodoxy for the past few decades: to emphasize on the one hand that the money supply should be brought under control while simultaneously allowing banking – where the money is actually manufactured – to run riot.

   To grasp how the global fraud works we need to step back in time and imagine ourselves next to the original goldsmith-banker.

   In his vault, 10 of his customers each deposit a bar of gold...  More...

2nd Inaugural Address; Obama Declares War on Liberty as We Know It

by Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart News

(Jan 21, 2013)

"But we have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action." -- President Barack Obama

Notice that Barack Obama doesn't understand -- or doesn't want YOU to understand -- that PRINCIPLES, by definition, do not change over time.  That's why they're called principles, like the Law of Identity, the Law of Cause and Effect, Do Unto Others, the 10 Commandments, the laws of physics, etc.  And namely, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  Therefore, preserving our individual freedoms DOES NOT REQUIRE a change to "collective action" -- which is Obama's Marxist code word for state collectivism, better known as national socialism.

Washington, DC -- Sounding the same themes of class warfare that propelled his re-election campaign, President Barack Obama devoted his second inaugural address to laying out his second term agenda: a struggle to undo the seeming injustices of America's past, and to overcome the army of straw men (Obama's and Karl Marx's continual fiction) that stand in opposition to progress.

In the process, President Obama attempted nothing less than an assault on the timeless notion of liberty itself:

"Through it all, we have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we succumbed to the fiction that all society's ills can be cured through government alone.

But we have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action."

After praising the "collective" and mocking the notion that America is a "nation of takers," President Obama targeted the political opposition. He targeted those who "deny" climate change, attacked those who allegedly refused to reward the elderly for their contributions, and defied critics whom he said wanted "perpetual war." He attacked the rich--as he has done so often over the past four years--and painted a caricature of an unjust nation: "...our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it....We do not believe that in this country, freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few."

President Obama's address failed to deliver on promises earlier in the day by senior political adviser David Axelrod that the speech would sound themes of national unity on a day of national "consecration." Instead, the president sounded combative themes familiar from his divisive first term, albeit wrapped occasionally in the lofty rhetoric of "hope" and "tolerance," and punctuated by the repeated refrain: "We, the People."

He acknowledged Americans have diverse concepts of liberty, but insisted that these could all fit together under the collective mission of the government to achieve its redistributive aims. Days after describing Republicans as...  More...

"Zero Dark Thirty," Real or Fake Extraction of Osama bin Laden?

(Jan 13, 2013)

This is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from reality.  By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?

Think about it.  The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"  -- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.  What?  Pakistan is going to say, "No?"

Washington, DC / Hollywood, CA -- The movie, Zero Dark Thirty, debuted yesterday and I dashed down to the Regal Cinema 22 to see it.  Did not read the book, which is out in hard back under a different title than Zero Dark Thirty.  Forgot the book title but you can't miss it at the book store or at Amazon on line.

The book was written by one of the Navy SEALs who participated in the extraction -- more like the straightforward shooting, the execution -- of Osama bin Laden at his hideout in Pakistan in some city called gobbledegook-bad.  All cities in Pakistan end in three letters: "bad."

There was something very unnerving about this whole episode of knocking off UBL -- Usama bin Laden --  that occurred in 2011.  It just doesn't pass the smell test.  Let's look at the basic facts.

The US government claims they didn't know where UBL was hiding out for 10 years.  Was it in a cave in Afghanistan?  A hut in whoopteedoobad?  The Marriott at Disneyland?  Then, some CIA babe deduces -- after a lot of water-boarding and other big time American torture -- that UBL was living in a compound less than a mile from Pakistan's equivalent -- ha ha, equivalent -- of America's West Point Military Academy in gobbledegook-bad.

This is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from reality.  By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?

Think about it.  The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"  -- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.  What?  Pakistan is going to say, "No?"

All the Pakistanis have to do in broad daylight is to invite the occupants of the suspicious compound outside for a cup of tea while both Pakistan -- our "ally," ho ho -- and the US military quickly search the suspected UBL compound to determine whether bin Laden lives there or not.  It's really simple.  And, hesto presto, if UBL is found hiding in the laundry basket or microwave oven, or under the lawn mower in the compound, then the US military and Pakistan arrests the dude and that's that.  If not, offer apologies to the head of household, dole out another billion dollars to Pakistan, and offer a free round of Bud Lites, courtesy of Barack Obama.

Is that what happened?  Nooooo.  Instead, the US CIA and Barack Obama...  More...

Obama/Congress Implement Marriage Tax Penalties in "Fiscal Cliff" Taxes

(Jan 02, 2013)

President Obama promised to sign legislation to allow gay marriage; then he signed a new tax law that penalizes married couples. 

Washington, DC -- The US Congress just passed a new law that increases the taxes of all Americans in many areas of the tax code.  The new bill does nothing to cut spending.  And the new bill does not address our out-of-control deficit, now at $17 trillion.  Nor does it address our looming debt ceiling.

But let's take a gander at a couple of the unintended tax consequences that Congress and President Obama just foisted upon all married couples.  That consequence is what's known as "The Marriage Penalty Tax."

Remember in the old days when inflation was only trotting along instead of galloping like it is today, and your IRS 1040 Tax Return listed exemptions or deductions for single and married couples?  The deduction for a married couple was not double the deduction for a single person.  In other words, it was more advantageous, tax-wise, for married couples to get a divorce and just live together as man and wife in order to double their tax deductions and exemptions.

This same anomaly -- called a Marriage Penalty Tax -- was stupidly passed in at least three sections of yesterday's House and Senate-approved "Fiscal Cliff" tax bill and President Obama will now sign off on this encouragement-to-get-a-divorce tax.

What are the new tax snafus that will penalize married couples?

Snafu # 1:  Income tax rates have now been increased from 35% to 39.6% for individuals earning over $400K, $450K for a married couple.  That means your spouse is only worth $50K for tax sheltering purposes.  Hey, get a divorce, live together and your total tax deduction will be $800K.  Ironically, Congress' new "Fiscal Cliff" tax law encourages divorce.  If you are a small business filing as a sole proprietor, it may be very important to you to shelter $800,000...  More...



 Investing in Gold?

Click above, Go to Kitco and find out the price of precious metals and stocks.


Citizens Against Government Waste

Who's the Federal Porker of the Month?

 Spotlight On:

Karl Marx Award
Worst Piece of U.S. Legislation

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, has been the worst piece of US legislation since the passage of the Federal Reserve Act.  Rolling out on the web site called in Oct 2013, Obamacare immediately crashed and burned.  6 million individuals have lost their current health care plans due to the mandates in Obamacare that forced insurance providers to cut current plans in order to comply with the provisions of Obamacare.  Essentially nobody has actually signed up for Obamacare yet because the payment subroutine in the software system for has not been written.  And nobody told the public about that fact.  So, come Jan 1, 2014, there will be individuals -- thank God not too many because nobody could get through all the crash and burn error messages on the online sign up screens for Obamacare -- who will find out at their doctor's office that they are NOT covered for health insurance.  Surprise!  As we go into 2014 and the employer sign up mandates go into effect, it is estimated that some 80 million individuals will lose their health care insurance as small businesses find it cheaper to cut their employee coverage than pay double and triple their current employee health insurance rates.  The only hope for the US is that Obamacare will continue to be the most expensive government flop ever -- costing some 680 million dollars just for the web site costs alone -- and this pernicious piece of punitive legislation will be abolished by a newly elected slate of Tea Party and Conservative majority in the 2014 Congress.

               Home • About us • Contact • Glossary • Links • Quack Off   all contents copyrighted ©1994-2015   Free Market Duck tm   all rights reserved