04-19-2011 Budget cuts are meaningless
without Federal Reserve transparency More...
News Revisited in the next 2 articles written three years ago at FM Duck and
even more applicable today since Japan's recent nuclear catastrophe:
02-22-2008 Idaho Legies create
Perfect Storm: yellowcake plus Yellowstone plus Snake Plain Aquifer equals
radioactive Super Volcanic blast More...
03-25-2008 Gov Butch Otter signs corporate
welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for
Perfect Nuclear Storm: a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of
Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie More...
03-01-2011 A Union Education...or
What Wisconsin reveals about public workers and political power More...
02-14-2011 Idaho Statesman claims
"nullification" of Obamacare is "immoral" More...
02-03-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 3 of 3 More...
02-02-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 2 of 3 More...
01-29-2011 What is the Basic Issue in
the World Today? -- Part 1 of 3 More...
11-21-2010 Idaho on the Verge of
Bankruptcy in 2012 More...
10-30-2010 New silver class action
invokes RICO against JP Morgan, HSBC More...
10-30-2010 Idaho Voters, Who Should You
Vote For... and Which Amendments? More...
10-27-2010 Federal Reserve Commits
Treason as it Asks 18 Major Banks How Much Money They Want the Fed to Give
Them to “Stimulate” the Economy: $250 Billion, $500 Billion, $1 Trillion,
$2 Trillion or More… More...
02-10-2010 European Central Bankers
Poised to Take Over Europe… More...
02-05-2010 Secret Banking Cabal Emerges
From AIG Shadows… More...
12-21-2009 ObamaCare is not about health
care; it’s about control and profits. Oddly enough, it’s not the insurance
companies; it’s the central bankers… More...
12-02-2009 Boise Trolley Folly DOES
Justify Legislative Intervention More...
11-06-2009 Federal Reserve to Switch to New
"Scratch 'N Sniff" Currency More...
10-27-2009 New Government Health Care
Plan Struggling to Find "Single Payer" Name More...
10-26-2009 Jesus appoints Obama as
"Associate Christ" More...
09-23-2009 Has Congress become an
09-18-2009 Leftist Boise Mayor Dave
Bieter in secret meetings to blow $560 million of federal welfare dollars on
downtown Boise streetcar named “Desire”… or is that a streetcar named “Huge
09-8-2009 Hey, kids, got game? Got
rap? Wanna be a rich movie star? “That isn’t hard work,” says Obama, “and
chances are you ain’t gonna be any of those things.” More...
09-8-2009 "Obama's speech to schools:
what civics lesson will parents teach their kids?” More...
09-1-2009 Ted Kennedy: "Lion of the
Senate" or Drunken Homicide at Chappaquiddick? More...
08-14-2009 Two Governors Bankrupt
Idaho's Highways, or Who let the GARVEE bonds out? More...
08-07-2009 "National" health care?
Stop thinking in terms of "collectives," we are individuals More...
08-05-2009 Fed Reserve, America's legal
counterfeiting ring More...
Statesman pushes Fascist Business Model as “Vision for the Valley”More...
09-06-2008 Look out!
Pistol Packing Mama, Gov Sarah Palin, blasts her way into the Republican
accepts VP slot with John McCain
chooses Idahoan Sarah Palin, a moose-hunting, fisher-babe, free market
Governor of Alaska, as Vice Prez running mate on GOP ticket
08-23-2008 Idaho stockpiles $500
million to $1 billion tax surplus on top of last year's $224 million
08-19-2008 Washington politicians
lie about true size of budget deficit More...
08-12-2008 Corporate Welfare
Alive and Well in Idaho More...
08-01-2008 "Covered Bonds" new
mortgage gimmick by "Banksta Gangsta" Treasury Sec Hank Paulson More...
07-17-2008 History of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac reveal gross corruption, fundamental flaws More...
07-03-2008 Zimbabwe inflation
hits 1,000,000% per year…
Government central bank issues new $50 Billion denomination notes as
paper currency becomes worthless More...
06-23-2008 Idaho Supreme Court
enforces socialist health care law…
Taxpayers must cough up $187,000 for illegal immigrant’s heart attack More...
“nightmare ticket” promises to drag U.S. down the road to serfdom via
Marxist socialism More...
05-30-2008 Idaho Pub Ed System
Run by Village Idiots?...
State Board Asks Feds to Restart Failure Clock for “No Child Left Behind”
05-23-2008 Global Monetary Recap
- 1944 to 2008 More...
05-21-2008 Kempthorne Hugs Polar
Bankrupts America More...
05-16-2008 Yeah, Kempthorne,
"Cough up" those gubernatorial records, will ya? More...
05-11-2008 Idaho: nuclear
waste dump of America More...
04-22-2008 2008 Legislative
Report Card for Idaho: F-minus More...
04-01-2008 Fed scientists
discover new element in Periodic Table of Elements: Paper More...
03-25-2008 Gov Butch Otter signs corporate
welfare Bill for $2 billion Uranium-235 enrichment plant to set Idaho up for
Perfect Nuclear Storm: a radioactive, volcanic firestorm on top of
Snake Plain Aquifer's Lake Erie More...
09-25-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... The solution: abolish fractional reserve central
banking, the Federal Reserve and govt monopoly of money; allow private
minting and free choice of currencies - Part 5 More...
09-20-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... The problem: unconstitutional Federal Reserve
plays Quantitative Economics (as if econ is physics) rather than Qualitative
Economics, which is based upon individual rights and freedom - Part 4 More...
09-17-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?... Derivative markets now exceed half a quadrillion dollars or
$500,000,000,000,000 of non-collateralized paper - Part 3 More...
09-16-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending
recession - Part 2 More...
09-15-2007 Wherein lies the value of today's
paper money?...or, the root cause of today's monetary crisis and impending
recession - Part 1 More...
09-05-2007 Boise's Toiletgate morphs into
Pinocchio-gate as Senator Craig's nose mysteriously grows another 2 feet
09-02-2007 Senator Larry Craig did not
resign and hired two lawyers, 1 for the Ethics Committee and 1 for the
Minneapolis men's room debacle
08-31-2007 Senator Larry Craig's abuse of
power & lame excuses are symptomatic of long list of GOP political abuses in
Idaho - Part 1
08-23-2007 J'accusse, Mr. Federal Reserve
did it with the Candlestick, the Rope, the Revolver, the Knife, the Wrench,
and the Lead Pipe in the House, the Senate, the University, and Wall Street
08-13-2007 Ada County Commissioners condemn
own property through eminent domain...
Pay Cryptic Partners $3.2 million in fake "takings" - Part 1
08-11-2007 Central bankers redefine
"hyper-inflation" as "liquidity"... Inject over $326,000,000,000 into global
economy to stave off stock market crash & recession
08-10-2007 NY Stock Market crashes 387
points as sub-prime fiasco hits Germany, France
08-09-2007 WSJ, Fox News pretend Ron Paul
votes for earmarks
08-08-2007 "The Fix" is still in, new
community college trustees interview only 1 person for Prez... and guess
what? He got the job!
07-30-2007 Harry Potter dies on page 597...
07-18-2007 "The fix was in... But that's OK;
This case warranted an inside job." -- Dan Popkey, Idaho Statesman
07-17-2007 Is the War in Iraq a Mafia-style
protection racket: U.S. military protects OPEC and OPEC promises to use only
07-10-2007 Ex Ada County Commish Judy
Peavey-Derr threatens libel lawsuit against Deep Throat II
07-05-2007 Idaho Senator Craig loses Illegal
Immigration Amnesty bill...Does Craig support prison inmates picking Idaho
07-03-2007 U.S. Constitution not signed by
Does surgery for cancer cause more
When Good Cells Go Bad (cancer:
who's right: viral theory or trophoblast theory?)More...
amazing cartoon was in the Chicago Tribune in
1934. Look carefully at the plan of
action. Note who's driving the out-of-control wagon: university
professors. Note Stalin and Karl Marx babbling the same type of Obama
fascist Progressive plan to "fundamentally transform" America. Remember the adage,
"Those who do not remember the past aredoomed to repeat it."
Sound money is a basic human right, derived from private
property rights. Alasdair Macloed says it best:
"Firstly, it is a basic human right to choose to save
without our savings being debased by the tax of monetary inflation. Those
who are worst affected by this inflation tax are not the rich -- they
benefit -- but the poor and the barely well-off, which is why monetary
inflation undermines society and why the right to sound money should be
respected. If government gives itself a monopoly over money, it has a duty
to protect the property rights vested in it.
"Secondly, it is a basic right for us to own our own money rather than have
it owned by the banks. For them to take our money and expand credit on the
back of it debases it. It is an abuse of an individual's property rights and
a banking licence is a government licence to do so. If anyone else was to do
this, they would be guilty of fraud. Banks should be custodians of our
money, and it should not appear in their balance sheets as their property."
ironic and sad, then, that advocates of recognizing gold and silver as
money, as was done in not-so-olden times, should be characterized as
conservatives, reactionaries, and worse when they are actually liberators
and when advocates of infinitely 'elastic' currency are actually the great
enablers of totalitarianism throughout the world.
money guarantees a stable yet progressive economy where people are truly
equal. It allows people to save properly for their retirement so that they
will not become a burden on the state. It leads to democracy voting for
small governments. It encourages peaceful trade and discourages war. It is
the only path, after this mess, that leads us to long-lasting and peaceful
prosperity. We really need everyone to understand this for the sake of our
When plunder becomes a way of life for a
group of men... they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal
system that authorizes it, and a moral code that glorifies it.– Frederic Bastiat,
The Law 
Sound familiar in 2012? Look around.
Must see movie out on DVD:
"The people should not be afraid of their government; Governments should be
afraid of their people."
Who is but the form following the function of what, and what I am is a man
in a mask.”
can see that.”
course you can. I’m not questioning your powers of observation. I’m merely
remarking on the paradox of asking a masked man who he is.”
this most auspicious of nights, permit me then, in lieu of the most
commonplace sobriquet, to suggest the character of this most dramatis
In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran cast vicariously as both victim and
villain by the vicissitudes of fate.
visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now
vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation,
stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin
vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious
violation of volition.
The only verdict is vengeance,
a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of
such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this
vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it’s
my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.”
Did You Know...?
The Ten Commandments contain 297 words. The Bill of Rights is stated
in 463 words. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address contains 266 words. A
recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911
Amendment X to the Constitution
of the United States, together with Article I, Section 8, prohibits the U.S.
Congress from involving itself in cabbage pricing, education, health care,
personal safety, campaign financing, most criminal law, toilet capacity, the
banning of amino acid supplements (such as tryptophan), vitamins (such as
B-17) and thousands
of other things it has gotten away with so far.
Quickie News Briefs
Monday April 14, 2014
-- Apr 14
It's been one day after the BLM and 200 secret service agents called it
quits rustling Rancher Bundy's cattle in Nevada and left the scene of their
(the BLM's) crime. How many major news media have covered the real
reason why the BLM raided Bundy's Ranch? A big fat zero. As
suspected, the major TV news media are pretending that they do not know that
this entire debacle is all about Senator Harry Reid and his son's attempted
land grab to sell the property to the Chinese government to develop a $5
billion solar energy project. So much for ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC,
and FOX News. Let's see how long it takes them to pick up the real
facts of this story... if they ever do.
-- Apr 13
After lying about reaching their goal of 7 million people signing up for
ObamaCare by March 31, 2014, Health and Human Services Director Kathleen
Sebelius resigned from her position. What's this all about? All
part of Obama's script. Since, in reality, Ms. Sebelius failed
miserably on ALL FRONTS of the implementation of ObamaCare, schedule-wise,
financially, and you-name-it, the Obama Administration first had to claim
victory and then get her out of her HHS position immediately after so they
could continue their phony victory lap. But it's not over.
Everybody and their brother knows that ObamaCare did not reach its goals, it
is still a bankrupt system that is depriving millions of citizens of their
previous health care policies and doctors, and it will eventually be
overturned either by future legislation or by the market itself.
National socialist health care systems are not financially feasible, they
are a violation of individual rights, and must by definition turn into
either bankrupt health rationing systems or simply go bankrupt. We are
now living in Orwell's 1984 with Washington politicians spewing out nothing
but lies lies and more lies.
-- Apr 13
News Flash!! Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid tried to grab a Nevada cattle rancher's leased land so Reid can build a $5 billion
Chinese solar project after selling said land to the Chinese. Hey, what's a hoppenink here? Over the
past several days, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and 200 secret
service agents armed with high powered sniper rifles and automatic weapons
descended upon cattle rancher Bundy and told him to get himself and his
cattle off the BLM's land. Why? Ostensibly, to save the desert tortoises.
But the desert tortoises were moved from this land to a compound in Nevada years ago and
are now actually being killed by the government because they ran out of budget money.
So much for this fake "endangered species."
Fake reason # 2: Rancher Bundy's cattle may wander onto nearby roads and
are, therefore, a hazard to the public, said the government. Really? One
stray cow may have been struck by
a car over the last 20 years. Wow and whoop-tee-doo. Open
grazing land near roads and highways are common all over the West and
warning signs are posted. Fake reason # 3: the
land belongs to the BLM. Buzz. Wrong. The grazing land in
question belongs to
Nevada, not the federal government. Rancher Bundy's family has been
farming watermelons and grazing cattle on this land since the 1800's.
Bundy refused to pay the BLM increased grazing fees back in 1994, claiming
they had no right to implement those fees on state-leased property.
The feds did nothing for 20 years. Now, all of a sudden, out of the
clear blue sky, the BLM and 200 secret service agents descended on Bundy's
grazing land and started swiping his cattle and tazing his sons and daughter
and anybody else who got in the way. Then, dum da dum... the
public finds out about this whacko attack against Rancher Bundy and a coupla
thousand armed cowboys and militia from other states descended upon the scene
to stand up for Bundy. Cowboys out-rustled the federal BLM cattle
rustlers and hauled Bundy's cattle back to his ranch. Traffic was
stopped and blockaded on Interstate 15. This entire hullabaloo soon went viral
on the Internet and independent news journalists started researching what's
a hoppenink down at the Bundy Ranch. As in, why is the BLM attacking some poor
rancher and trying to take his land using phony excuses? After about 5 nanoseconds of simple research,
Internet journalists discovered that Senator Harry Reid and his attorney son
have been working behind the scenes for several years to buy -- at dirt
cheap prices -- Bundy's cattle grazing land and sell it for a tidy profit to
a Chinese government energy company that the Reids have been setting up --
via federal legislation -- to build a $5 billion solar project. To
this end, the Reids have already talked the states of Nevada and Idaho into
building a federal Transmission line from Idaho Falls, Idaho and through
Nevada to -- ostensibly -- run the power from the Chinese solar project IF
IT IS SUCCESSFUL. So here's the upshot: Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid and his son have allegedly tried to pull off a land grab in
Nevada in order to sell state land to a Chinese solar company to make a
profit by selling the Chinese some grazing land. Yesterday, after a
standoff between armed BLM secret service thugs and armed cowboys from other
states, the feds called it quits and pulled out. The real reason,
however, is that Sen. Harry Reid got caught with his fraudulent pants down,
found out the news media was all over this scam, and no doubt President Obama weighed in and told him to cool it, dude. Now it remains to be
seen whether any of the major news networks will continue their
investigation and bring it to the attention of the judicial system.
Will anything happen to Senator Reid of Nevada? Time will tell but I
wouldn't bet on it.
-- Apr 01
Hallelujah! Just as the last day to sign up for ObamaCare in 2014
occurred yesterday at 11:59 am midnight, President Obama and his National
Socialist Administration announced that they have reached their goal of
signing up 7.1 million people in their socialist health care system!
What a coincidence. They amazingly reached their goal of 7 million sign-ups
for ObamaCare. Who'd 'a ever thunk it, especially after failing
to reach their milestones every single month
since Oct 2013? Wow. What a last minute surge. But... there remain a zillion questions
concerning the numbers such as what constitutes "people who have signed up"
or "people who have actually paid for it" or "people who are new enrollees"
or... ? In short, we believe the government simply decided to redefine
the stats and lied about how many people have actually signed up for ObamaCare. All of these real or faked numbers are immaterial anyway
since the real issue is individual rights vs. government mandates,
individual rights vs. The Omnipotent State. It doesn't matter how many millions
did or did not sign up for ObamaCare. Your personal health care is a
private free market issue between you and your doctor. It is no
different than your right to choose what car to buy or not to buy a car at
all. Health care is just another commodity in the market over which
you, as an individual, should have total control vis a vis an exchange with
your choice of health care professionals. Health care is not an
individual right; education is not an individual right; having the
government provide you with a car or a computer or a home or any other
commodity is not an individual right. Rights are not commodities.
Rights are freedoms that you are born with. Rights are universal and
are not obtained from a government or a piece of paper. Those, such as
Republicans or Conservatives or Tea Partiers, etc., who are busy arguing
against ObamaCare based upon real or imagined statistical data instead of as a violation of
individual rights will lose their debate because their Democratic state
collectivist opponents will simply use statistics to lie and then claim
victory. Which is exactly what just happened yesterday. Today,
or soon, President Obama will probably show up on national TV and lie to the
public that his administration has reached their numerical goal of signing
up 7 million people for his socialist health care system and, thus, claim
program is right on schedule to save everybody from polio, cancer, and
stubbing their toes on the way to their local pub.
Mar 28 In the No-Honor-Among-Thieves Dept, over ten bankers/traders
coincidentally died within the last several months. My, my, how
mysterious. According to Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge News, 5 guys
allegedly committed suicide, 2 guys fell from JP Morgan rooftops (one in
London, one in Hong Kong...how clumsy of them), one guy jumped in front of a
train, and one guy shot his own ass deader 'n a door nail with a nail gun.
The rest of the deaths are categorized as, "We don't know, investigation
pending." Meanwhile, central banking bankers in JP Morgan, B of A,
Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and others have been ordered to pay fines of over
$100 Billion while still making profits of over $76 Billion last year.
Yippee and yahoo, printing up unlimited supplies of dollars, yen, pounds,
and plastic cards still pays well. And Americans are now over $17
trillion in debt to, hmm, let's see now, oh yeah, their own silly little
selves for allowing Congress to allow the central bankers to hyper-inflate
our currency. Looks like the bankers are either knocking each other
off in a Gangsta Banksta War or those working in the financial districts
happen to be really really clumsy walking around on the roofs of buildings,
waiting for trains, handling nail guns, and playing with their kids' jump
ropes. So far, the following bankster/traders have kicked the bucket.
1 - William
Broeksmit, 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG,
was found dead in his home after an apparent suicide in South Kensington in
central London, on January 26th.
2 - Karl Slym,
51 year old Tata Motors managing director Karl Slym, was found dead on the
fourth floor of the Shangri-La hotel in Bangkok on January 27th.
3 - Gabriel Magee,
a 39-year-old JP Morgan employee, died after falling from the roof of the JP
Morgan European headquarters in London on January 27th.
4 - Mike Dueker,
50-year-old chief economist of a US investment bank was found dead close to
the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington State.
5 - Richard Talley,
the 57 year old founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colorado,
was found dead earlier this month after apparently shooting himself with a
6 - Tim Dickenson,
a U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG, also died last month,
however the circumstances surrounding his death are still unknown.
7 - Ryan Henry Crane,
a 37 year old executive at JP Morgan died in an alleged suicide just a few
weeks ago. No details have been released about his death aside from this
small obituary announcement at the Stamford Daily Voice.
8 - Li Junjie,
33-year-old banker in Hong Kong jumped from the JP Morgan HQ in Hong Kong
9 - James Stuart Jr,
Former National Bank of Commerce CEO, found dead in Scottsdale,
Ariz., the morning of Feb. 19. A family spokesman did not say what caused
10 - Edmund (Eddie)
Reilly, 47, a trader at Midtown’s Vertical Group, committed suicide
by jumping in front of LIRR train
Mar 28 Is the speed of light changing from one constant to another as
The Big Bang continues expanding our DERN universe? What is the
smallest unit of time and how is it measured? If one can control the
rate at which the smallest particle used to define the smallest unit of time
moves between point A and point B, can one then move back in time and also
up into the future? But if one can visit the future, is this just a
probable future, with many other possibilities, or is the future in our
universe already pre-determined? If so, what about free will? We
will be addressing these and other questions in the near future -- no
pun intended -- in these pages, as well as how they may tie in with ET
humans and the information they may be providing to us regarding our
intellectual and spiritual development. And... how all this relates to
our views of social-political-economic issues, namely ideas of freedom and
free markets. Just how universal are these ideas about individual
freedom and who else out there in the universe believes in them, too?
Inquiring minds want to know...
Mar 14 Quote from the former Premier of the Czech Republic, Vaclav
Klaus: "The danger to America is not Barack
Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the
Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good
judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their
president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr.
Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince
of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that
made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who
is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude
of fools such as those who made him their president."
Mar 06 Dontcha just love it when thugs like Vladimir Putin of Russia
and Barack Obama of America manipulate their lying, thieving selves to the
top of their respective governments and then claim to be "public servants"
-- yeah, SERVANTS -- who are helping all the poor underdogs in the world by
providing them with stolen goods taken from everybody else in the economy?
And if they don't steal everybody's goods directly, they take them
indirectly by, for example, modifying their respective nation's medium of
economic exchange to be easily duplicated, inflated, printed, or just plain
increased on a fake ledger within the bowels of their national bank's
computers. Clearly, the way to take over a nation is to take over the
management of its money supply. Welcome to the clever Federal Reserve
system, a private group of bankers who have convinced all the idiots and
politicians of the world that they can lead the economy with a continual
deficit and thus create wealth. That's like saying that Farmer Jones
can eat up all his seed corn, issue IOUs for non-existent seed corn, and
make everybody filthy rich. There is no way but the people buy off on
it, especially Democrats who, by definition, are Democrats precisely because
they know nothing about money and economics. What is money and who
gives a holy $hit if it's inflated to Hell and back? Well, answering
the latter first, you should care because, first, money is a form of
communication and is unknowingly protected by freedom of speech in the First
Amendment. Think about it. Money is a temporary medium of
economic exchange, written in a promissory contract, in which the explicit
contract of communication between two parties is that one party will provide
the goods while the other party will accept a PROMISE (communication) to
receive his goods at a later date. If the first party lies by changing
the PROMISSORY NOTE in any manner whatsoever, then the first party is
committing fraud. So, if the first party counterfeits the PROMISSORY
NOTE, inflates the money supply in order to force the price of goods higher
than before, then the first party has, in fact, defrauded -- lied to -- the
second party. But that is the real function of each nation's central
bank: i.e. to gain advantage over others in a form of communication
called "money." The second function of each nation's central bank is
to be able to use this power of the manipulated purse to control
politicians. By offering politicians "free" money, central banks end
up being the true politicians who control the actions of all nations.
Controlling the free speech of money, the PROMISSORY NOTES between two or
more parties, is how bankers have taken over all economic policy, running
civil and international wars, and completely managing every aspect of every
individual's actions, directly and indirectly. So, you see that when
thugs like Vladimir Putin of Russia and Barack Obama -- or George Bush or
FDR or Lyndon Johnson or Woodrow Wilson -- of the United States dash into
invading other nations like Putin just invaded the sovereign nation of the
Ukraine, or President Barack Obama suspends everybody's personal and private
property rights by forcing his national socialist health care system down
all Americans throats, they are simply carrying out their duties and
promises to their own central bankers who are actually the Wizards of Oz
pulling off the Smoke and Mirrors behind everything that happens in the
world. Like the Rolling Stones' front man Mick Jagger, the central
bankers of the world need front men, too -- Presidents and legislators in
most major nations -- to dance around and sing about how they're simply
altruistic "public servants" saving all the people from their stupid little
selves. (No disrespect to Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones, who are
just a good rock bank and are not crooks.) Voting booths are magic boxes in which people who can't be
trusted, say Democrats, to make decisions in a free market all of a sudden become geniuses
and know what action to take by stepping into a polling booth. The
people of Russia don't give a rat's ass about oil pipelines and shooting
their neighbors, but Russia's leader Vladimir Putin sure as Hell cares since
it keeps him in the front man position with the real powers that be:
the central bankers pulling his strings. Same for President Barack
Obama. Americans could give a big whoop-tee-doo about ObamaCare --
until it blows them out of their doctors' offices or they lose their health
care -- but Obama cares because he wants to stay in power, playing a lot of
golf, and giving ridiculous speeches to college kids, all the while knowing
that he owes his front man position to the Federal Reserve central bankers.
The entire economy, your home mortgages, your car financing, your kids'
college loans, your savings and interest rates, and ad infinitum concerning
money and freedom of speech are now all controlled AND MANIPULATED by the
central bankers. Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama are simply clowns on
a string, dancing to the tune of their banking masters and convincing
everybody to choose up phony sides in phony wars and phony self-made
economic catastrophes so they can continue to strip you of your freedoms and
get rich by looting your products in order to, you know, "save you"
from all the evils of the world.
Of course the politicians get a broker's fee for this: staying in
power, getting rich, and living the life of Riley. Wow. What a
racket. And not one person in a hundred million understands what is
really going on with a nation's finances and money. Especially left
Liberals, by definition. Conservatives know half of it.
Libertarians know almost all of it, also by definition. Meanwhile,
dance, Barack, dance; do the electric slide...and the Monetary Hustle...
-- Wed Mar 05
Ex IRS official Lois Lerner wrote in an email, "Tea Party cases are very
dangerous," in regard to granting them tax exemptions such as a 501 (c) (4)
for their political group. However, at a special Congressional
committee today in which Chairman Issa asked Ms. Lerner what she meant by her
email statement, Ms. Lerner exercised her Fifth Amendment rights and refused
to answer on the grounds that it may incriminate her. She stood on the
Fifth on several questions before Chairman Issa finally called the meeting
to a close. Ms. Lerner, the day before, wanted immunity in order to testify but she was
not granted immunity because nobody knows what her testimony would be in
order to grant her immunity. The bigger question is: if she did
nothing illegal, for what reason would she request immunity? Immunity
is usually for those who are admitting guilt but are making a deal to squeal
on others in exchange for that immunity. Just what does Ms. Lerner
want immunity for? Further, how can her answering questions about her
emails be incriminating unless she did something illegal? Looks like
somebody in the Obama Administration got to Ms. Lerner in the last two days
and either threatened the crap out of her or bought her off with some Xmas
presents... or both. At any rate, something stinks to high Heaven in
Washington DC, once again, vis a vis the IRS selectively targeting Conservative political
groups in their granting of IRS tax exemptions. Get this: no
Democratic political groups were denied IRS tax exemptions during the Obama
lower in the IRS food chain than Ms. Lerner needs to come forth and blow the
whistle on this entire stinking matter. We suspect it leads directly
to the White House and their attempts to thwart all Conservative political
groups from running against Obama's left Liberal socialists who now control
the government. And people wonder why Eric
Snowden who blew the whistle on the NSA gathering everybody's emails and
other communications had to flee the country and then
blow the whistle. Otherwise he would probably have ended up in jail or
dead. Or both. Welcome to the beginnings of Stalinist Russia and Nazi
Germany. That's how they did it; and now that's how the Progressives
in the US are doing it: taking over the entire nation with force and
Mar 02, about 6 pm MST Wow, the Oscars are off to a great start
tonight as the Academy pulled off a stupid skit in which some dork actor talking to
one of the Hollywood greeters climbed through a flat screen TV and scolded
two grossly overweight viewers sitting at home eating junk food. The
two pretend viewers, wearing underwear and sloppy clothes, had apparently
sent Tweet messages about the dress style of some of the
actors and actresses marching down the red carpet into the Oscars. So
the dork actor who climbed through the TV screen dissed the crap out of the
two viewers. The skit
was supposed to be hilarious but it actually dissed all Americans who are
NOT glamorous movie stars and just ordinary citizens sitting at home
watching the Oscars, portraying the viewers as a bunch of slob ignoramuses.
But THIS IS exactly what many Hollywood actors and actresses really think of
ordinary American citizens. Hollywood should
be careful. It's not nice to bite the hands of those who feed you.
Speaking of biting everybody in America, who else does this remind you of?
That's right, the politicians in Washington DC, especially the Obama
Administration, as President and First Lady of America arrogantly flaunt
what they think is their entitlement of wealth and royalty every other
whipstitch minute. No wonder most of Hollywood gets along great with
Obama and the crooked left Liberals in Washington DC: they're all cut
from the same moral philosophical and intellectual cloth, and guess what...
it ain't diamonds. Stay tuned. Let's see if Hollywood screws up
the Oscars any more tonight... OK, it's past 9:30 pm MST and the
Oscars are still dragging on... mostly boring as Hell... with Ellen
Degeneres wasting lots of not-so-funny time buying 3 boxes of pizza for
various movie stars and taking a selfie cell phone pic of same. Next
year, set your DVR, record the Oscars, and then zip through 5 hours of
Hollywood crap and commercials to find out who wins Best Actor and Actress.
Actually, I voted for President Obama for Best Actor and First Fat Lady
Michelle for Best Actress. Nancy Pelosi for Best Supporting Actress,
Harry Reid for Best Supporting Actor. ObamaCare for Best Worst Movie
of The Year, receiving 6 million Pinnochios at its premiere launch.
Mar 01 Guess how many citizens in the great state of Oregon have
signed up for ObamaCare? Zero. Why? The geniuses in left
Liberal Oregon volunteered to implement ObamaCare as its own ObamaCare in a
new state health care exchange. So Oregon has spent millions and
millions of dollars on computer software for their state ObamaCare system
that, oops, doesn't work. If you live in Oregon, which Obama Executive
Order are you, or your business, following in order to fulfill the mandates
of the Affordable Care Act? Do you follow the original mandates in the
ACA law passed by Congress or the 28 Executive Order changes unilaterally
made by President Obama (illegally) without the vote of Congress.
Executive Orders are meant to clarify the verbiage of existing law, not to
re-write the mandates of existing law. And Idaho is not far behind
Oregon. Idaho's voluntary state health care exchange is a total bust,
too, with hundreds of thousands of Idahoans losing their current health care
policies and doctors and being encouraged to sign up for state Medicaid.
Unfortunately, there is not enough money in all the pockets of all the
citizens of Idaho to pay for the extrapolated increase in taxes to cover
this new Medicaid cost. Thank you, Gov Butch Otter, for shoving
ObamaCare down the throats of Idaho's citizens. Hopefully, you will
not be serving a 3rd term for your RINO cohorts in Idaho after the Elections
Feb 18 As we have stated numerous times, President Barack Obama is
now moving into the 2nd level of the standard state collectivist personality
trait: the blame game. The 1st level is proposing state
collectivist economic programs such as national socialist health care,
government automobiles, or federal lollipops for everybody. The 2nd level
consists of the dictator blaming everybody except oneself when
his/her socialism fails. So what is the Obama administration
doing now? They're using the IRS to force businesses to sign a
document stating whether businesses laid off people because of budget cuts
due to ObamaCare. Think about that for a moment. By what
right does the Internal Revenue Service force businesses to state why said
may have cut employee expenses or any other reason, whether for higher health
care costs, higher production costs, or any other expense? And then
make it criminal if a business says "Oh yeah, I chopped 10 employees because
I couldn't pay their health care costs." We just can't wait for level
3 of Obama's dictatorial personality trait: "OK, all you guys who are
guilty of not trying hard enough to implement ObamaCare line up for the
train to your re-education center in Arizona where we will show you how to
sacrifice yourself for the good of the majority." Oh, and this is
immediately after President Obama stated in his interview with Bill O'Reilly
of FOX TV, "Oh no, Bill, the IRS was not involved in targeting Conservative
political groups to prevent them from obtaining 501 (c) (4) exemptions, not
even a SMIDGEON." Uh huh. And not even one Democratic political
group was turned down or harassed by the IRS. Not one.
Feb 17 In the Water Drought Hypocrisy Dept, Obama golfs at
water-guzzling desert courses while preaching about California drought.
According to Patriot Update, "After preaching
shared sacrifice [FM Duck
Note: key word for state collectivists: shared sacrifice] to assuage the California water shortage, Obama has played
some of the country’s thirstiest golf courses. President Barack Obama
traveled to California Friday to highlight the state’s drought emergency at
two events near Fresno, calling for
shared sacrifice to help manage the
state’s worst water-shortage in decades. He then spent the rest of the
weekend enjoying the hospitality of some of the state’s top water hogs:
desert golf courses. Vacationing with DVDs of his favorite television
shows and multiple golf outings with his buddies, the duffer-in-chief played
at two of the most exclusive courses in the Palm Springs area. On Saturday, Obama played at the Sunnylands estate, built by the late billionaire Walter
Annenberg, which features a nine-hole course that is played like 18 holes.
The following day he golfed at billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison’s
19-hole Porcupine Creek. On Presidents’ Day, Obama hit the links at
Sunnylands once again. The 124 golf courses in the Coachella Valley
consume roughly 17 percent of all water there,
one quarter of the water pumped out of the
region’s at-risk groundwater aquifer,
according to the Coachella Valley Water District. Statewide, roughly one
percent of water goes to keep golf courses green. Each of the 124 Coachella
Valley courses, on average, uses nearly 1 million gallons a day due to the
hot and dry climate, 3-4 times more water per day than the average American
Water shortage, right? Not over-population?
Feb 16 President Barack Obama and his Progressive Boot Lickers are now
calling for the IRS to slap down all the Tea Party, Republican, Libertarian,
and Conservative political groups who are running ads against ObamaCare for
the 2014 Elections. Democrats who voted YES for ObamaCare are now
running for the exits and don't know what to do to convince voters that
ObamaCare is not a failure as some 6.5 million Americans have now lost their
health insurance and doctors. Calling for the IRS to save their little
state collectivist butts only one week after Obama was interviewed before
the Super Bowl Game, Obama stated that not only was the IRS not involved in
harassing Conservative political groups over the last two years but that
there was not even a "smidgeon" of involvement by the IRS. Ya-yesssss,
not even a "smidgeon." Uh-huh. One week later on national TV,
Senator Schumer called for the IRS to target Conservatives to stop them from
running campaign ads against the failure of ObamaCare. Schumer wins
the Cheshire Cat Big Fake Grin Award for 2014, surpassing Vice President Joe
Biden and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi in 2013. "Huyuck, I guess
we'll just have to read the 3,000 pages of ObamaCare to find out what's in
it, huyuck, giggle, snort," said Pelosi, as she spread more lipstick on her
Feb 02 Lest you think
America could never reach the hyper-inflation absurdities of Germany's
Weimar Republic, you are witnessing this process right now as it unfolds in
History Lesson 101A, Weimar Republic, Germany, 1920s In
1914, Germany’s Fed Reserve, the Reichsbank, suspended conversion of its
paper money into gold. By November 1923, after continual “injections of
liquidity,” Reich Marks in circulation soared past 92.8 quintillion Marks
and skyrocketed past 496 quintillion Marks through July of 1924. On Oct 25,
1923, the Reichsbank apologized that it had been able to only print 120
quadrillion Marks that day, but the demand was for one quintillion Marks.
Finally, after nobody would accept the Mark, the Reichsbank devalued to a
new Rentenmark convertible at 1 trillion to one. By Nov 1923, circulation
had increased 245 billion times and prices 1,380 billion times. Inflation
finally stopped in one day when 4.2 Rentenmarks (4.2 trillion old Marks)
exchanged for 1 Dollar, which was convertible into gold. Germany, via the
Dollar, finally went back to the gold standard, after destroying its entire
economy in 9 years through hyperinflation of its non-backed paper money.
Dr. H. Hazlitt, Economist
Today, in 2014, after FDR dumped the gold standard in 1933 and Nixon cut all
dollar ties to gold in 1971, our derivative markets currently exceed a half
a quadrillion dollars or $680,000,000,000,000 – six hundred trillion
dollars – of non-collateralized paper fueled by America’s central bank, the
Federal Reserve. And what is it that everybody is screaming for more of?
The injection of trillions and trillions of more non-collateralized paper
money as “liquidity” to “spur” the “growth” of the economy.
-- Sat Feb 01 Left Liberal newsrag, The Idaho Statesman,
reported today that "inappropriate" funds transfers might cost Idaho
taxpayers $27 Million. A 2013 internal audit report, 30 pages, reveals
that State Treasurer Ron Crane -- with no other oversight -- moved funds
whose face value was $31 Million, but whose market value was $19 Million,
from one government fund into another in order to increase the target fund's
ratings. Two problems here: (1) although it is entirely legal,
the state of Idaho should not be "investing" taxpayer money into investments
whose principle (as well as interest) value can go up or down, and (2) one
individual should not have the power to unilaterally decide how to invest
taxpayer funds into any type of investment. Let's look at (1).
Even though monetary inflation by the Fed central bank is devaluing our
money and everybody wishes they could preserve the face value of their
money, it is sheer folly to think than in today's highly manipulated markets
(from stocks to bonds to commodities, think JP Morgan controlling naked
shorts, the corrupt CFTC doing nothing about it, etc.) that Idaho's Lone
Ranger State Treasurer, Ron Crane, could devine which Wall Street structured
vehicle (e.g. chopped up fake mortgages) to take a chance on with Idaho
taxpayer money. But he did. And That's how local, county, state,
and federal governments go broke. Just like the Federal Reserve
planned, or at least doesn't give a crap because they (the Fed Reserve) can
just create more fiat currency out of thin air. Idaho's taxpayer money
should be placed in savings types of accounts whose principles are not at
risk. Will they earn big time interest? No. Will they lose
through monetary inflation? Yes. But, why take the chance of
losing BOTH principle AND interest? The problem is the Federal Reserve
and you cannot fight the Federal Reserve except through Congress.
Looking at (2), no one individual should be able to move Idaho taxpayer
money all over the place. The auditors also noted this and have
recommendations to correct this oversight, although Mr. Crane, from his
rebuttal comments in the audit, appears to think what he did was OK because,
he says, in hindsight nobody knew which direction the market was going.
But, as the auditors said, it did not take hindsight to know that one cannot
value funds at face value. Rather they must be valued at market value.
It's called mark-to-market. Also, the State Treasurer should not be moving funds from one government
investment account to another in order to boost the second account's
ratings. One moves funds to protect value to the taxpayer, not for
government ratings purposes. Two more important points in the 2013
audit: Mr. Crane is in charge of managing $2.9 Billion in taxpayer
funds. What a red flag this is, especially under current
circumstances. 2nd point: Idaho's hospitals were OVER-TAXED some
$14.7 Million in 2013 when a 2012 piece of taxing legislation expired in a
sunset clause in 2012. Other juicy info in Idaho's 2013 audit reads
like the federal government's standard financial absurdities, think the
current economic health care and unemployment mess caused by ObamaCare.
Me? Personally, I think the high point of the 2013 audit is this:
the State Treasurer is in charge of $2.9 Billion of Idaho's taxpayer money?
Uh-oh. Red Flag. Beep beep, honk honk.
-- Thur Jan 30 President Obama lied through his pearly white
teeth in his State of the Union speech.
Lie # 1: The Obama administration has created over 8 million new jobs
over the last 4 years... yea, scream, screech, applause from the
Democratic socialists in the audience... but, oops, not true. Since
the start of Obama's dictatorship, only 3.2 million jobs have been created,
many of them PART TIME GOVERNMENT JOBS, and the US still has 1.2 million
fewer jobs than in 2007.
Lie # 2: Obama said, "Today, women make up about
one-half of America's work force, but they only make 77-cents for every
dollar that a man earns. That is wrong, and in 2014, it is an
embarrassment." ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic
socialists in the audience... Really? 77-cents? Buzz,
wrong, you lied, not true, Mr. President. Obama is using figures from
the Census Bureau and comparing apples with oranges regarding types of jobs.
In some jobs, paid hourly, women make 14-cents to 19-cents less than men
while in other jobs, salaried management, women earn just as much or
millions more than men. Salary is not the only comparison for total
compensation; women receive maternity leave that men do not. Many
women want to raise children; they do not want a CEO position, and on and
on. Obama is pretending that women are being frozen out of good jobs
in the work place and that is simply not true.
Lie # 3: Obama's shameless inflation of the
ObamaCare enrollment numbers. He said, "More than nine million
Americans have signed up for private health insurance or Medicaid coverage,"
implying that these numbers are the result of his Affordable Health Care
program. ...yea, scream, screech, applause from the Democratic
socialists in the audience... 6.3 million of the Medicaid numbers are
HIGHLY questionable, earning a rating of 3 lying Pinocchios from industry
sources. And 3 million of the private insurance members from ObamaCare
statistics are absolutely false. ObamaCare stats counts the number of
people who logged onto the ACA Healthcare.gov system, NOT the number of
people who successfully obtained health care and paid their first premium.
How do we know this? Because the software for the insurance payment
has not been written yet. In reality, if you haven't finished
enrolling or even made a payment, you are not insured. The fact is,
over 6 million people have LOST their current health insurance due to
ObamaCare and the new rules his program has imposed upon America.
ObamaCare has actually gone backwards, accomplishing exactly the opposite of
its socialist goals? Wow, where have we seen that before? Not
only that, but software consultant after software consultant has testified
to Congress that the ObamaCare computer system is not safe, is hackable by
identity thieves, and has, in fact, already been hacked. Yet,
President Obama was pretending in his State of the Union speech that
ObamaCare is a raging success while the facts show that it is a resounding
failure. Plus, it cost the American taxpayer over $680 million, almost
$600 million more than the original estimate, and it ain't over yet, folks.
The Obama administration just issued another $90 million software contract
to a new group to try to save the current failure.
Meanwhile, Human & Health Services Director Kathleen
Sebelius sat there during Obama's SOTU speech and received a standing
ovation from the Democratic socialists for the lies being told about her
system. She should be fired immediately and President Obama should be
impeached for lying to the American people and illegally changing the ACA
mandates (i.e. legislation passed by Congress) with Executive Orders that
violate his limited statutory authority granted in the US Constitution.
So much for all the imperial pomp and circumstance at
President Obama's latest State of the Union pack of lies.
-- Wed Jan 29 Ah yes, the President's State of The Union address
last night. What did he tell us? Both overtly and between the
lines? Overtly President Obama aggressively put forth his ideology of
Marxist socialism. As predicted, he has now passed the point of
insinuating the implementation of his socialist principles by using
mamby-pamby words such as "hope and change" and "fundamentally change
America." Now that his socialist programs have failed, the economy is
approaching ruins, people have lost their jobs, lost their health insurance,
and the wars in the Middle East are still raging, President Obama -- like
all previous socialist dictators before him in every nation -- is now openly
displaying his anger. He now says he is not going to work with the US
Congress to do anything. He is going to sign off on dictatorial
Executive Orders to bypass the checks and balances of the US Constitution.
He is the President of "No Authority." It is not the number of EOs
that he is issuing that's the major problem; it is the substantive depth of
the changes that the EOs are intended to bring about. Total
dictatorial authority. There is no statutory authority for President
Obama to use an EO to change the legislative mandates of, for example,
ObamaCare. EOs are meant to clarify and expedite existing legislation,
not re-write the legislative mandates. Mr. Obama is now going through
the same process that all wanna-be state collectivists go through when they
see that the people are rejecting their government programs: bullying,
threatening, and openly waging an all-out war
against the very people he is screwing over, ironically,
in the name of the very people he is
screwing over. In this 2nd Marxist stage of How Dictators Take Over
Nations, Obama is following in the footsteps of Stalin, Lenin, Adolph
Hitler, Mussolini, Mao-Tse-Tung, Fidel Castro, Idi Amin, and Genghis Kahn.
He knows what's right. He knows what should be done. He knows
that if only he could play Total Dictator, dump Congress and dump the
Supreme Court, he could save everybody from all the evils in the world.
But the people and Congress will not cooperate. They refuse to buy
health insurance through ObamaCare. Nor should they because this $680
million government program doesn't work, puts personal information at risk
to hackers, and, most importantly, restricts all individuals' freedoms to
choose their own doctors and health insurance policies. Millions have
lost their health insurance due to ObamaCare. But Obama lies about
ObamaCare's failure. The people, he claims, don't know what's good for
them. Only he knows. And he knows so much about economics, he
thinks, that he can't understand why the dirty rotten people and his
political opponents don't just divvy up all the money in the world, create
work communes, and distribute the wealth equally among everybody.
Well, almost everybody. Not himself or the other Rulers in his
dictatorship. They get more cookies than everybody else because
they're in charge. Obama and his cronies are so brilliant and they
have to manage all the trillions and trillions of market exchanges, buys and
sells at the government-approved "correct" prices in the not-so-free market
so that everything works like the well-oiled-machine that they know Marxist
socialism will create. Uh huh. Right. Screw the consumers.
What do they know? Screw the free market; it's not fair, said Karl
Marx. Obama still believes in the outdated "Labor Theory of Value."
Even socialist economists -- an oxymoron -- don't believe in the "Labor
Theory of Value" any longer, and yet every economic sophism Obama puts forth
rests in part on this false axiom. In the 3rd stage of How to
Implement Socialism, when the communes and redistribution of all the money
in America doesn't work, somebody must be at fault and they will have to
pay. With their lives. First, by loss of freedoms. Then by
incarceration and finally by extermination. The Marxist path is
well-known. Those who still don't understand the ideology that
President Obama is following will soon discover that they have made a grave
mistake. But, unless Obama and his ideas are curbed, it will be too
late. The USSR, the People's Republic of China, Socialist Cuba, and
now Obama's "Fundamentally Changing of America" with "I got a pen and a
phone" to bypass Congress and issue a thousand illegal EOs. Obama's
SOTU speech last night is an open war against the individual, against, the
rule of law, against the US Constitution, and against the concepts embedded
in the inherent rights of man. Last night, President Obama openly
declared war against America, against YOU, and he has told you his game
plan. Wake up, people!
-- Sun Jan 26 Ding dong! Notice to Idaho voters.
This year, in 2014, the GOP is holding a closed
Primary Election. Last year the GOP held a
closed caucus style of voting for its Primary Elections. In
previous years in Idaho, Primary Elections were open, meaning that you did
not have to register for a particular party before voting. One could
just show up and vote for anybody in any party. The GOP bitched and
moaned and groaned that the minority party, the Democrats, were screwing
over the GOP by purposely voting for the worst GOP candidates in the
Primaries and then voting for their favorite Democrat in the General
Election. So, starting last year, the GOP decided to (1) hold a closed
Primary in which you had to register as a GOP voter to vote for a Republican
candidate in the Primary, and (2) hold the Primary as a town hall style
caucus down at BSU's Taco Bell Arena. This year, in 2014, the closed
GOP Primary has been retained but the caucus part has been dumped.
Good riddance; it was a failure for many reasons.
So, beep-beep, pay attention, if you plan to vote for
a Republican in the Primary, you must register as a GOP voter before March
14, 2014. The Democrats can do whatever they want.
They can get tricky dicky, register as Republicans for the GOP Primary and
vote for the least desirable GOP candidate, and then vote for Hillary "The
Lying Bitch" Clinton in the General Election. But here's the deal:
Idaho has some 700,000 - 800,000 registered voters, about 250,000 GOP and
400,000 Independents, with the rest being Libertarians, Tea Party,
Constitutionalists, and assorted Commie-Fascist-Socialist-Progressive-state
collectivist Liberals. As you can see, Liberals in Idaho are in the
minority. So what's the Big Point? Idaho often votes and
implements left Liberal laws and agendas because the majority GOP is not
really Conservative. No, Martha. The majority GOP in Idaho is
ruled by a bunch of RINOs, which means Republican In Name Only.
Witness the fact that Idaho is the only Republican state that implemented
ObamaCare's state health care exchange -- on the premise that if Idaho
didn't implement it themselves, Adolph Hitler in the federal government
would do it for them later. Therefore, reasoned Gov Butch Otter -- who
is a Liberal on Monday, Republican on Tuesday, Socialist on Wednesday,
Fascist on Thursday, Democrat on Friday, Cowboy on Saturday, and Catholic on
Sunday -- Idaho had to play left Liberal Progressive and sell itself to the
Devils in Washington DC in order to save itself. This was before the
release of ObamaCare's Healthcare.gov crashed and burned on Oct 1, 2013, and
has been crashing and burning ever since. Gov Otter and his RINOs --
as predicted -- were absolutely WRONG and shoved Idaho in the wrong
direction. Caving in to Adolph Hitler and His NAZI health care plan --
i.e. appeasing the Dictator -- is a funny way to try to defeat him.
Witness PM Chamberlain in Britain who stupidly thought he could appease
Germany's Adolph Hitler, weeks before good ol' Adolph broke their agreement
and invaded Poland. That's when Churchill had to take over. Gov
Otter is Chamberlain and, now, more Idahoans have lost their health
insurance than have signed up for new health care policies. And the
trend will worsen as, in 2014, small businesses will dump most of their
employees' health care coverage, pay a cheaper fine, and the number of
Idahoans falling into already bankrupt Medicaid will skyrocket. A cost
that Idaho cannot afford. How does all this fit into registering to
vote GOP in the Primary? Simple. We need a Winston Churchill.
Those of you who are Independents and Tea Partiers -- 400,000 of you -- need
to register as Republicans by March 14, 2014, so you can vote for Senate
Republican Majority Leader Russ Fulcher for Governor in the GOP closed
Primary. Otherwise, current Gov Butch Otter and his RINOs running the
Republican Party will easily win the GOP Primary and Idaho will get more and
more state collectivist programs from Dictator Barack Obama in Washington
DC. The Independents in Idaho are actually Conservatives who, in the
past, did not want to register in a particular party. They are not
Liberals. But now, if they want to move Idaho toward individual rights
and a free market, they must register as GOP voters in order to dump the
RINOs. If you like the ideas put forth by Rep Ron Paul, Sen Rand Paul,
Legislator Ted Cruz, former Gov Sarah Palin, etc. you can -- by registering
as Republicans -- elect a new Govenor, Russ Fulcher, who can then abolish
Idaho's state health care exchange. You can dump ObamaCare.
Plus, you can lower taxes for businesses and individuals, and, in general,
cut Idaho's growing welfare state. It is up to the Independents in
Idaho to dump the RINOs and move Idaho back toward the Constitution and Bill
of Rights. Your state, your choice. If you stay home and do not
register by Mar 14, 2014, you lose and have nobody to blame but yourself.
-- Sun Jan 19 "We're not just going to
be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we're providing
Americans the kind of help they need. I've got a pen and I've got a
phone." -- President Barack Obama during last week's Cabinet
meeting. Analysis of President Obama's statements: (1) Who is
the first "we" -- the collectivist entity, the group, the mob -- that Obama
is referring to in "we're not just going to be waiting
for legislation...?" Is this collectivist "we" his own private
army, a cadre of progressive czars, or who? (2) Who is the second "we" --
the collectivist entity, the group, the mob -- that Obama is referring to in
"we're providing Americans the kind of help they
need?" If it's not legislation, then it's not Congress, so who
is this mystery group that thinks it's OK to make an end run around Congress
to "provide" Americans with whatever Obama and his collective think
Americans might need? Are the first and second collectivist "we's" in
Obama's statement one and the same? (3) Who gets to define
"the kind of help that Americans need?"
In other words, what does the word "need" mean and who gets to establish its
definition? Is it a need or a desire? Is it an economic
commodity or an inherent Natural Right? A Natural Right is not an
economic commodity. Needs are relative. Does Person A's needs
supersede Person B's needs? Does this "needs" test -- and who gets to
determine it -- mean that Person B's individual rights are subordinate to
Person A's individual rights? Summary: If you still don't
believe that President Obama is a national socialist or some type of state
collectivist trying to act as a dictatorial redistributionist broker, then
you should pay closer attention to the words that he uses. He means
what he says. If President Obama had placed his sentences in the first
person singular instead of camouflaging them with a third person plural and
instead had said, "I'm not just going to
be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that
I'm providing Americans the kind of the
help [that I think] they need," then his
dictatorial ideology would stand out clearly for everybody to see. But
Obama and his handlers are more clever than that. They want you to
believe that he is an altruistic philanthropist who only has other people's
"needs" in mind. Further, he
believes that other people's "needs" trump your individual "needs" or, more
importantly, your inherent Natural Rights. It's OK, he thinks, to play
the fake altruism card in the name of other people -- "needy" people --
rather than his first person singular card. That would smack of
individualism, greediness, selfish, and not a good excuse to take over the
entire US economy. No, one must use altruism as the excuse for taking
over a nation and the collective as the target recipient to become a true
dictator. And that is exactly what President Obama stated as he closed
out his dictatorial statement with, "I've got a pen
and I've got a phone." Meaning, he can trash the three
branches of government, all checks and balances that were put in the US
Constitution EXACTLY for the reasons that he wants to dump them, because HIS
socialist means justify HIS socialist ends. That is what Obama was
actually saying to the American public and to the world at large. His
true intentions are questionable: does he really want to save
everybody or does he just want more power? It really doesn't matter
since it's his methodology that is killing off the individual, killing
private property rights, killing individual responsibility, and killing the
ability of true free market capitalism to bring down economic costs and thus
increase the quality of life for all individuals on planet Earth.
Socialism doesn't work; freedom and the free market does. Advice to
President Obama: Warm brain before opening
-- Fri Jan 17 "I've got a pen and I've
got a phone," said President Barack Obama. Remember how FM
Duck told its readers the major steps that most Dictators take on their
Marxist tromp towards implementing state collectivism?
Step One: The would-be Dictator, e.g.,
Adolph Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Mao Tse-Tung, and Barack
Obama, for example, reveal how they have solved every problem in the world
by reading Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Step
Two: The would-be Dictator passes legislation or beats people
to death to implement, for example, a national socialist health care system
to save everybody from every sickness in the world.
Step Three: The would-be Dictator's
national health care plan crashes and burns and brings about the exact
opposite of its proposed results. Step Four:
The would-be Dictator claims his national socialist health care system
was/is being undermined by his enemies and everybody else. This is
where the US is currently at in 2014 with President Obama's failed ObamaCare
Step Five: The would-be Dictator issues
proclamations to FORCE his national health care system down everybody's
throats under penalty of incarceration. Referring to the US Congress which Obama considers irrelevant, Obama is now
ready to go around Congress by issuing Executive Orders (his illegal
socialist proclamations) and calling his enforcers on the phone to implement
his dictatorial proclamations. Step Six:
Those who fail to "voluntarily" participate in the would-be Dictator's
national socialist health care system will be fined, taxed, shipped to
re-education camps, and eventually, exterminated for failure to make the
Dictator's national socialist health care system a raging economic success.
It's the people's fault, not the would-be Dictator, he claims. That is
how it always happens and that is how Obama intends on becoming Dictator of
America -- all for "good intentions" of course. Will he succeed?
Tune in for the results of the 2014 and 2016 Elections and find out.
Yahoooooo, it's Adventure Time! "I've got a
pen and I've got a phone!"
-- Tue Jan 14 Where is the birth
certificate? Among the many records the Obama camp has
refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and
mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack
Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s
repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani
Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school
records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School
records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with
Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state
senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.
Various court cases are winding their way through America's judicial system.
When they will show up, nobody knows. Possibly as early as March 2014.
Possibly others who have knowledge about this issue will get run over by a
MACK truck, fall off a building, or crash in a plane in the ocean. But
one thing is for sure: somebody is hiding something.
-- Sun Jan 12 The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
does not even investigate JP Morgan's
outrageous manipulation of gold and silver in the futures market.
Morgan appears to be able to flaunt established laws with complete impunity
and not even bother to hide the fact. Why should it? After all, JP
Morgan is the Federal Reserve, our nation's illegal central bank. This
is just another good example of how central bankers own and control the
earth -- including governments, entertainment, media, education, natural
resources, food production, 'science', healthcare, and mega corporations.
This is not free market banking. This is government monopolized
banking. It is socialist banking. They own us too by extracting
wealth from every human each day via taxes, inflation, and market and
interest rate manipulation and now bail ins and bail outs. They control
former President Bush and current President Barack Obama. They write
the laws that enrich banks and impoverish humans and have governments
enforce them. Where is the opposition that any thinking man or woman can
support? The key word is "thinking." That leaves Liberals out.
And most GOP Republicans. Only the Tea Party and Libertarians
understand, and I suspect many of them don't totally get it.
Incredibly, there is zero debate, and almost zero
understanding of how central banking has a hammerlock on humanity -- or that
central banking is not free market capitalism. I repeat:
central, nationalized, monopolized banking is not free
market capitalism. And this concept, not understood by one in a
million individuals, is the root cause of all of our current economic AND
Middle East war problems. Inflation is a faster way to wipe out
society than a full blown war. Bankers have the sole right to create
currency from nothing and charge the world interest on it. They have
successfully erased 5,000 years of human history regarding how gold and
silver are real money and have now substituted non-backed, non-receipts of
paper, plastic, and fiat credit. Instead of real money, humans now work for
credit at the bank. If you have a job, it's very likely that you are working
for a banker-controlled entity. The actual model resembles the 'company
town' concept where we work for company script that's only good at the
company store. Welcome to Company America and welcome to the Company Bank,
the Federal Reserve. After we've 'paid' for company housing and
supplies from the company store, there is nothing left. How and from where
will the truth be realized so that people can begin to see and understand
the complete tyranny we live under? Don't feel too bad. Rumor
has it that even human ETs from Eros who live in a Pleades system vibrating
a fraction of a second from our own Pleades system and are some 10,000 to
18,000 years advanced from us in most other sciences such as physics,
chemistry, biology, astronomy and time travel do not completely comprehend
the social-political-economic sciences involving what constitutes real money
and what constitutes free market capitalism. Ain't that a hoot?
ET humans showing up to planet Earth, and like Earth humans, think national
socialism and Barack Obama's socialized health care system is the way to go,
while simultaneously preaching individual rights and responsibilities
throughout the universe. Maybe something was lost in the translation
-- much like something has been lost in the translation between ObamaCare
and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, between gold money and fiat
paper currency, between Cause and Effect vis a vis what's real and what is
not. Somewhere, even the axiomatic primary, the Law of Identity, has
been lost. But don't worry, Mother Nature will always come back to
bite us in the ass. You can't fool Mother Nature.
Jan 11 The Obama Administration just fired the computer contractor,
CGI, who blew $680 million of taxpayer money and failed to implement Obama's
Healthcare.gov system. Now, the Barack Hussein Obama Administration is
signing a new contract for $90 million with a new computer contractor to
take over. Why isn't this front page news? Where is the left
Liberal news media? $680 million plus $90 million equals $770 million
plus whatever else it has cost the government to try and implement a
national socialist health care system. Just think, all we really had
to do to implement a reasonably low cost health care system is the same
thing we have done to implement a reasonably low cost iPhone system, or
automobile system, or shoes, or food, or any other free market commodity:
get the government out of the way of the free market and allow everybody to
shop for health insurance anywhere in the world, cut the absurd medical
lawsuits, and laissez-fricken-faire. We all want inexpensive health
care. That's not the issue. The issue is the methodology to
bring it about. The quickest method for the most people with high quality health
care -- just like for every other commodity -- is through free market
capitalism, not via the government. Wake up Obama! Wake up
Liberals! Socialists are those individuals who understand nothing
about money, nothing about economics, nothing about freedom, nothing about
private property rights or... the politicians understand all the above;
they're just plain crooks who make their living by playing the role of
redistribution brokers, redistributing the fruits of YOUR labor. Or,
let's just be nice and say Liberals are naive little 12-year olds whose
educational level regarding money and economics is still at an elementary
level, my dear Watson. Meanwhile, where is Congress in approving this
new $90 million that the Obama Administration is preparing to throw down
another government rat hole?
Jan 11 Liberal reasoning: assumption, people are inherently too
mean, rotten, stupid, and bad to allow them to live in freedom, i.e., free
market capitalism. Liberal solution: all the inherently mean, rotten,
stupid, and bad people who are incapable of living in freedom go into a
voting booth and vote for other inherently mean, rotten, stupid, and bad
people (by definition, remember) to govern all the inherently mean, rotten,
stupid, and bad people. Wait a minute. Isn't this a
contradiction? How can inherently bad people elect good government?
Are we supposed to believe that inherently bad people morph into saints by
stepping into a voting booth and perform that which they were incapable of
doing in freedom? Is a voting booth some magic contraption? Or
could it be that Liberals are starting out with a false premise, using false
methodology, and, therefore, bringing about a disastrous result:
namely, the creation of the very problem the Liberals presumably set out to
Jan 10 Hmm, let's see now... An American ambassador and three
associates were murdered at the Benghazi Embassy over a year ago and the
Obama Administration has done zip zero nadda nothing. At a
Congressional hearing last year, Sec of State Hillary Clinton said about the
Benghazi murders, "Who gives a $hit (paraphrase), it's all over now!"
Zip zero nadda nothing. But yesterday it was announced that last
September a traffic lane on some bridge in
New Jersey was temporarily blocked upon the orders of some minor GOP politicians
to screw over the Democratic Mayor of Smallesville
and all Hell breaks lose. Obama ordered an FBI investigation
yesterday, the Liberal news media is having a Major Big O, and New Jersey
Gov Chris Christie spent over 2 hours on all the major TV networks answering
asinine questions about a ridiculous traffic jam. Oooh, wow, don't we
Americans have our social-political-economic priorities in order. The
Federal Reserve is hyper-inflating us to the Moon and back, we have several
wars going on in the Middle East, Obamacare is on the verge of bankrupting
the US economy with millions of people losing their health care coverage,
half the nation is on Food Stamps, unemployment is over 20%, they're rioting
in Spain... and I don't like anybody very much... as the song goes...
Oh yeah: let's not forget, the NSA is spying on everybody's emails,
phones, texts, twitters, and personal thoughts in the bathroom.
Seriously? A lane on a bridge in New Jersey was blocked for a day?
Call in the FBI? Get a life, people.
Jan 08 President Barack Obama tried to blame -- if you can believe it
-- FOX News for the failures occurring with Obamacare. Watch FOX News'
Neil Cavuto answer President Obama in no uncertain terms regarding who's to
blame for all the failures with Obamacare. Click on the following
Jan 06 Yippee! Obamacare cooks the books! In the last days
of Obamacare’s formulation, the projections had
student loans folded into them to make them not seem so
“At the last minute, they
said, ‘Look, let’s take what was then called the
Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act,make it part of
healthcare and then we can make the budget numbers come out right… [W]e will
take these projected profits from the student loans, and we will say that’s
part of Obamacare.’”
This fiscal conjure trick
could lead to more than just accounting problems in the future.
“It’s very dicey to look
at federal profits on student loans, and say they will make those profits,
and to know why they are doing it and what the money is being used for,”
said one source. “To follow the smoke and mirrors of budgets— especially Obamacare — is impossible.”
Jan 04 Was President Barack Obama born in the US and then pretended on
US college applications that he was a foreign student born in Kenya and
attended primary school in Indonesia? Or, was President Obama actually
born in Kenya and grew up in Indonesia? If the former is true, and if
American colleges Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard fell for it, then we can
understand why the powers that be had to hide all of his college paperwork
since they would have revealed that he applied for entrance and financial
aid as a "foreign student," even though he was not. That would
constitute fraud and is a criminal offense. He would immediately be
impeached. If on the other hand, he was actually born in Kenya, then
he does not qualify to be president of the United States and would thus also
qualify to be impeached. Something has to explain why his college
paperwork has been hidden from the public. Whether it's the first
reason or the second reason, he should be impeached. If there is a
third reason, namely, that he was just a regular Joe Doe American born in
Hawaii, then why hide all of his university paperwork? One does not
have to be the famous Belgian detective Hercules Poirot to conclude that
something stinks in Washington DC vis a vis faux president Barack Obama's
Jan 04 Half of the women in the Marines could not perform the minimum
physical test of 3 pull-ups to qualify for a combat position last year.
Now the program is on hold while politicians and idiots at the Chief of
Staff level try to rethink their "politically correct" previous decision to
open up combat positions for women. Several questions: why would
a woman want to be "the quick or the dead" in a combat role in the first
place? 2nd question: why would the US Military even consider
placing women in a position for which most women are unable to perform
physically? Not to mention the added problems of members
of the opposite sex living in close quarters, close enough to encourage love/sex
triangles and other related romantic escapades that impede a combat
soldier's main mission? In answer to the first question:
obviously some woman who is either delusional about what constitutes hand to
hand combat or has a death wish. The problem is that her delusions and
denials are likely to get a lot of other combat soldiers killed when she
can't scale a simple wall and her male counterparts are forced to go back to
save her. Or, she could thwart the entire mission, the success of
which is dependent upon its weakest link. In answer to the 2nd
question: it appears that the US Military has become physically dumbed-down
for the sake of social and "political correctness." What's next:
doing away with men's and women's categories in the Olympics and other
sports? Having said all that, there are plenty of other "combat" roles
for women in the military such as flying aircraft in battle, intelligence
and counter intelligence gathering, etc. Men and women are not
physically equal; mentally yes, physically no. Men can't physically
have babies; women can't physically perform 20 pull-ups and kick ass in hand
to hand combat. Yes, we can conjure up a transgender man and
physically implant a fertilized egg so "he" can biologically have a baby, and yes we can
find a body building woman who can do 20 pull-ups. But these anomalies
are not a sound or rational foundation for a US Military combat force like
the Marines, the Army, or the Navy Seals.
[Note: It is now almost Jan 2014, a
year after the following article was written. The federal version of
Obamacare has crashed and burned, 6 million Americans have lost their
health care insurance, and Idaho's state health care exchange version of
Obamacare is a dismal failure. Hello Gov. Otter, I TOLD YOU SO, over a
year ago!] Fri Jan 04, 2013 Idaho Gov Butch Otter thinks he has tricked the federal
government. Yeah, he'll show Obama. And ObamaCare. Otter
has OK'd the setting up of a national socialist health care system in the
state of Idaho -- to go along with the federal government's ObamaCare
program -- on the premise that if you voluntarily participate as the victim
in a bank robbery, you can better control what happens when the bad guys
dash in and say, "OK, stick 'em up!" Yeah, right. The bank
robbers -- the ObamaCare feds -- get to hold the guns, pull the triggers,
and steal your money while you get to stand there with your pants down and
your hands up in the air. Gov. Otter thinks that because the feds let
him build Idaho's state health care exchange, paint the walls, hang up
President Obama's picture in the entrance, and pave the
parking lot, that he -- Gov. Otter -- is somehow in control of all the
health care robberies that the federal government will be conducting in
Idaho's -- or
rather the fed's -- state health care exchange. This is exactly what happened to the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s. Just let the Third Reich tattoo a number on your
forearm. We don't want to control your life. No. Uh-uh.
Just let the Third Reich place a little Star of David on your store.
We don't want to run your business. No, of course we don't. Oh,
yeah, and now how about all of you citizens with the last name of Schwartzenfinkenheimerberg
and brown eyes move into the special "ghettoes"
the Third Reich has conveniently set up for you. We don't want to
control your movement, your freedom, or your rights. No. Just
because we tattooed a number on your body, took over your business, and gave everybody
free state education, free state medical care, free state lunches and free
state yo-yos, doesn't mean
your forced movement into a "ghetto" is an incarceration. Just volunteer
to march into our re-education "camps" and everything will be OK. Yeah, you bet.
So, Gov. Otter, when do you finally stand up with a pair of cajones like the
Libertarian or even GOP individual you claim to be and say, "Hell no!" to
the federal government? "No!" to ObamaCare? "No," to the basic
injustice of Obamacare that Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court is trying to
foist down our throats? Stop whining about how you have no choice.
Our forefathers had a choice to go along with the British or say, "No!"
The difference is: Franklin, Jefferson, and Washington had a pair of
moral philosophical balls. Where are yours? You're leading Idaho
into the ultimate sate "ghetto" by voluntarily
participating in a federal robbery of our rights. In the beginning,
you said, "No" to ObamaCare and now you are caving in to the federal
government. That's how it always happens, all throughout history.
The bad guys obtain the sanction of their victims just before they force
them into cattle cars and then ship them off to "re-education" camps. Thanks loads, Governor.
Pin a left Liberal sticker on your back because that's exactly where you're
taking the state of Idaho. State collectivism. And you think you
are outwitting Obama and his national socialist cronies? Volunteering
Idahoans to be the victims in ObamaCare is more stupid than volunteering to be the
victims in your own bank robbery. Wake up, Governor. It's the
1930s all over again. Don't make the same mistake. You must
abolish Obamacare before it abolishes us. [Note:
It is now almost Jan 2014, a year after the above was written. The
federal version of Obamacare has crashed and burned, 6 million
Americans have lost their health care insurance, and Idaho's state health
care exchange version of Obamacare is a dismal failure. Hello Gov.
Otter, I TOLD YOU SO, over a year ago!]
Dec 29 You know your society is doomed:
see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion.
When you see that in order to produce, you
need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing.
When you see that money is flowing to those
who deal, not in goods, but in favors.
When you see that men get richer by graft and
by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but
protect them against you.
When you see corruption being rewarded and
honesty becoming a self-sacrifice. -- Ayn
-- Sun Dec 29
Whoa, pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup
of Rocket Java and listen up, girl friends. President Obama ordered
the Cabinet to cut $100,000,000 ($100 million) from the $3,500,000,000,000
($3.5 trillion) federal budget. I'm so impressed by this sacrifice
that I have decided to do the same thing with my personal budget. I spend
about $2,000 a month on groceries, household expenses, medicine, utilities,
etc., but it's time to get out the budget cutting axe, go through my
expenses, and cut back. I'm going to cut my spending at exactly the
same ratio (1/35,000) of my total budget. After doing the math, it looks
like instead of spending $2,000 a month, I'm going to have to cut that
number by six cents. Yes, I'm going to have to get by with $1,999.94,
but that's what sacrifice is all about. I'll just have to do without
some things, that are, quite frankly, luxuries - six cents worth.
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation...
One is by sword...The other is by debt." -- John Adams
How Big is
a Trillion Dollars?
Dec 27, 2013
DC – Whoa, girl friends, gather round, shut up, and pour yourselves
another hot cup of Rocket Java. Have you ever seen a million dollars? How
about a billion dollars?
What does One Trillion dollars look like?
All this talk
about "stimulus packages" and "bailouts"... A billion dollars here...
a hundred billion dollars there... Eight hundred billion
dollars for President Bush’s TARP bailout... Eight hundred billion dollars
for President Obama’s ARRA “stimulus package”… One TRILLION
What does that
with a $100 dollar bill, currently the largest U.S. denomination in general
A packet of one
hundred $100 bills is less than 1/2" thick and contains $10,000. Fits in
your pocket easily and is more than enough for a week or two of shamefully
Believe it or
not, this next little pile is $1 million dollars (100 packets of $10,000).
You could stuff that into a grocery bag and walk around with it.
While a measly
$1 million looked a little unimpressive, $100 million is a little more
respectable. It fits neatly on a standard pallet...
-- Wed Dec 25
Understanding the US economy in two easy steps:
US Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000 (trillion)
Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000 (trillion)
New debt: $1,650,000,000,000 (trillion)
National debt: $14,271,000,000,000 (trillion)
Recent budget cuts: $38,500,000,000 (billion)
Let's now remove 8 zeros and pretend it's a household
* Annual family income: $21,700
* Money the family spent: $38,200
* New debt on the credit card: $16,500
* Outstanding balance on credit card: $142,710
* Total budget cuts so far: $385
Got it ?
Dec 24 President Obama, in his inimitable Emperor Nero style, leaned
over the balcony of the White House yesterday -- all the way from the golf
course in Hawaii -- and fiddled on his violin while his signature health care
system, Obamacare, crashed and burned. Obama's previously unconstitutional
movement of the Affordable Healthcare Law's deadline to Dec 23rd as the last
day to sign up for health insurance for 2014, has now been
unconstitutionally moved, again, to midnight Dec 24th, Christmas Eve.
Who does he think he is? Santa Claus? So what happens if
Obamacare crashes and burns on Christmas Eve and Americans can't sign up,
again? Who knows? Maybe our Muslim Marxist Messiah will stop
playing golf in Hawaii long enough to illegally proclaim another "due date"
to sign up for Obamacare. How about New Year's Eve? What does
the original law say? Who knows, who cares? Obama is now the law
unto himself and apparently he can change any piece of legislation he wants
anytime he feels like it. Hey, why not just suspend all elections and
Obamacare can be our Dictator King for as long as he wants. Will infinity be
long enough for him to implement his fundamental socialist changes for
America? Tune in next week for Obama's Adventure Time, as he
unconstitutionally declares the government takeover of all US major car
companies -- oops he already did that. Sorry. How about, tune in
as Obama takes over all the communications companies in America: Google,
Yahoo, MicroSoft, Facebook, and Twitter. Oops he already did that,
too, and incorporated them into the NSA, spying on everybody in the nation,
collecting -- "but not actually reading" -- their private cough-cough
private mail, yeah, uh-huh. Let's all sing together, Obama's theme
song, "Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for me..."
Dec 23 Whoa, pull up the barn floor,
pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java, and listen up, girl friends.
If Attorney Orly Taitz ends up dead in a month or two, you should be
suspicious that it was no accident. Who is Orly Taitz? She is an
attorney who has been investigating the legality of Obama's Social Security
Number, the discovery of which would then answer the question about whether
Obama was born in the US (Hawaii) or not. As posted by reporter Tim Brown on
Freedom Outpost in his article: Judge Rules Obama
Social Security Card Fraud May Finally Get Answers, "According to a news release from Taitz, 'Judge Hollander in Maryland gives Attorney Orly
Taitz 21 days to file a second amended complaint and add allegations in
regards to an improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of
records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally
used by Barack Obama. When Taitz filed the complaint, SSA did not respond at
all. After the law suit was filed, SSA responded by fraudulently claiming
that the records were not found. Taitz responded that this is a fraudulent
assertion, since the records were found before and denied to another
petitioner due to privacy concerns, however Social Security has no right to
claim privacy as according to their own 120 year rule they have a duty to
release the records. The judge stated that the plaintiff Taitz might be
correct, however at this time she cannot rule in her favor as her original
complaint was filed before SSA responded, so the judge gave Taitz an
opportunity to re-file a second amended complaint and add new allegations,
stating the SSA responded but improperly hid the records . This is a great
development. This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to
release the SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison
(Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in
Obama’s 2009 tax returns, which initially were posted on WhiteHouse.gov
without proper redaction, without flattening of the file. Taitz will be very
careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied in the next 21 days.'"
What Taitz is referring to, that she will be
“careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” is that she "believes
that both Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were targeted by Obama for
assassination.” Breitbart died on the very day that he said he would begin
vetting Obama for the 2012 elections, which raised suspicions. Fuddy, best
remembered as being instrumental in issuing the Hawaii long-form birth
certificate [FM Duck Note: which many authorities have claimed was an
obvious fake], was the only person to die aboard a small plane that crashed
off the cost of Hawaii last week. Already there are questions
surrounding Fuddy's death. In addition, the mother of one of Obama's
gay, crackhead friends during his college years alleges that it was not
coincidental that her son and two other gay buddies were all killed within a
6-week period just before the 2008 presidential elections that Obama won.
In addition, Taitz claims somebody, somehow is tampering with her private
server and internet connections to prevent the sending of mass e-mails.
Like we said above, if attorney Orly Taitz all of a sudden has an
"accident," you should be suspicious. And greatly concerned.
Dec 22 President Obama has now declared that the Affordable Care Law
passed by Congress is only a set of Suggested Flexible Guidelines that he
can alter at will -- which he did, again, last night for the umpteenth
time. And from where does Obama claim he obtains this newly found
power to alter Congressional laws? Certainly not from Article 2, Sections 1,
2, 3, or 4 which enumerate Executive Branch powers or anywhere else in the US Constitution. Obama, last night
before jumping on Air Force One to play golf in Hawaii for the next 17 days
over the Christmas holidays, popped up on national TV and declared
his umpteenth change to Congress's Affordable Care Act: namely, individuals whose health plans were
canceled -- what are we up to now, 6 million people? -- will now
automatically qualify for a “hardship exemption” from the ACA mandate. If they
can’t or don’t sign up for a new plan, they don’t have to pay the penalty tax. They
can also get a special category of ObamaCare insurance designed for people
under age 30. This is 2-3 times higher than people were paying before
losing their existing health care plans that Obama PROMISED (but knew
otherwise) they could keep under the new ACA. Obama's latest
announcement was not a surprise to the insurance companies who thought the
Affordable Care Act was a real law, with mandates that, if violated, were
punishable by law. And, in fact, the insurance companies had to drop
millions of health care policies over the last three years because the Affordable
Care Act mandated that their insurance policies be changed in accordance
with the new law. So, we have at least two big questions: (1)
From where does Obama's Executive Branch obtain the authority to change
Congress's legislative laws, and (2) which is the real Affordable Care Act
law that all Americans must follow or end up being taxed, fined, sued, or
end up in court? Which suggestion or guideline that Obama issues in
regard to his latest alteration of the Affordable Care Act should attorneys
and judges refer to when insurance companies and individuals show up in
court to adjudicate any differences of opinion? What would the Supreme
Court rule upon: the ACA as passed by Congress, or the ACA as changed
day-to-day by President Obama and his Executive Department? By the
way, you know that parking ticket you received last week for parking in the
red zone in front of that fire hydrant in downtown New York? You don't
really have to pay it; it was only a suggested guideline. Welcome to America
where there are no longer any laws, only Suggested Flexible Guidelines.
To all my
Please accept with no
obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally
conscious, socially responsible, low-stress, non-addictive, gender-neutral
celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most
enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular
practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion
and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or
secular traditions at all. I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally
fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the
generally accepted calendar year 2014, but not without due respect for the
calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have
helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater
than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere .
Also, this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age,
physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee.
To all my Republican Friends:
Dec 17 Referring to the Obama administration’s executive action to
unilaterally allow younger illegal immigrants brought to the United States
by their parents to be exempt from enforcement laws after Congress rejected
the DREAM Act, Congressman Gowdy said Obama was “substituting” his judgment
for Congress’s. The Big Question is: which other laws can the
president ignore? “If you can turn off
immigration laws, if you can turn off mandatory minimums in our drug
statutes, if you can turn off the so called Affordable Care Act, why not
election laws?” Gowdy said. “Assume that
a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president
require three forms of ID? Can the president require one form of ID? Can he
suspend all requirements that you show ID? And if not, why not. If you can
turn off certain categories of law, do you also not have the power to turn
off all categories of the law?” And this is why many
Americans are so concerned that President Obama will try to declare martial
law, suspend the US Constitution, and demand that he continue to be
President for an unknown further period of time. Why not? This
is exactly what he's doing with Congress's Affordable Care Act and other
pieces of legislation. How far can he go in violating the
Constitution? When will the US Congress take action to curb President
Obama's unconstitutional actions?
Dec 16 The Paul Ryan-Patty Liberal new budget deal has been rammed
through the US House of Non-Reps and is now waiting to be greased up and
slipped through the US Senate. What does it do for you? Nobody
knows. Like Obamacare, nobody has read it all the way through but we
do know it (1) increases your taxes, (2) increases the budget by $1 trillion
dollars, (3) is your standard GOP RINO drivel to appease the left Liberal
Democrats so the RINOs can stay in Washington DC and live the life of Riley.
House Squeaker John Boehner blasts the Tea Party Conservatives for standing
on limited government principles. He -- like all RINOs -- always go
for compromise compromise compromise, which means always caving in by never
standing on principle and claiming that what he does is the lesser of two
evils. Hey, isn't that how we got to where we are now? $17
trillion in debt, a Federal Reserve central bank that is hyperinflating the
US economy into oblivion, and on the verge of being totally destroyed by
the implementation of a national socialized health care plan. And this
will lead to... ? Demonstrations in the street? Obama
calling for Martial Law? A civil war that could morph into an
international WW III? What do you think will happen when businesses
have to shut down because Obamacare has wrecked the economy? What do
you think people in large metropolitan areas will do when the food and water
are cleaned off the shelves during this civil unrest? Hey, read a
history book. Better yet, just look at many Third World countries and
their dictatorships, especially in the Middle East. A word to the wise
is sufficient. And the RINO GOP will never never ever relate their
current actions to the future unrest that may well envelope the US.
"It's not our fault," they will scream. "we were just trying to be
fair to everybody and compromise." Compromisers always lose to the
lowest common denominators: the state collectivists, usually based
upon "altruism" or better known as "the needy." It is always a war of,
"I am more needy than thou," and then the shooting starts. The
government, of course, is only the "Needy Broker," redistributing the
cookies to their friends and the masses. It's called rationing and
looting. That is what compromising your free market principles will
Dec 13 Wake up Idahoans! Georgia and South Carolina have just
introduced legislation to dump their state Obamacare health exchanges.
It's time for Idahoans to contact their legislators and demand that they
introduce a bill to dump Idaho's state Obamacare exchange, too. Unless
you've been living in Bango Tongo to took a trip to Mars for the last two
months, you should already know from national news that the roll-out of not
only the Obamacare web site
www.heathcare.gov but the entire Obamacare system is a complete total
train wreck. Nobody has completed the sign up process to pay for
health care on the federal Obamacare web site because the payment software
routines have yet been written. The 385,000 people who HHS Sec
Kathleen Sebelius said have navigated as far as they could on Healthcare.gov
will soon find out that they, in fact, do not have insurance, have lost
their current insurance, their new insurance will cost double or triple,
their deductibles will be double or triple, and if they show up to their
hospital or doctor, they will not be covered. The Obamacare
administration predicted they would have 7 million people signed up for
Obamacare -- vs. the 385,000 suckers who "think" they have signed up for new
health insurance -- and when January 2014 hits, the entire health case
industry will simply run off the tracks and crash over a giant economic
cliff. In Idaho,Gov Otter and his RINO friends forced Idaho into an
Obamacare state health exchange on the premise that if Idaho didn't become
pro-active then the federal government would take over and force Idaho into
Obamacare. They were wrong. And nothing could be further from
the truth. The federal government can't even create a viable web site
to sign anybody up. Obamacare is collapsing at every level, federal
state and local, and threatens to implode every state's Medicaid budget as
more and more people opt out of their current medical plans -- or have had
their insurance policies cancelled due to non-compliance with the new
mandates of Obamacare -- and then qualify for their state's Medicaid.
This will be a total fiscal disaster since no state has the funding to pay
for this huge influx of new health care recipients. One wonders
whether the powers that be in Idaho simply wanted to establish a state
health exchange for their political buddies in the insurance and legal
industry, like they've done for a lot of other pieces of pernicious
legislation. Gov Otter, now a certified RINO just like former Gov Jim
Risch (now a US Senator who loves to hoity-toity his butt around the parties
in Washington DC) and Dirk Kempthorne (now a lobbyist for a major
corporation in Washington DC), is now facing a major political fight for the
next term of Governor. Idaho Senator Russ Fulcher, a Tea Party
supporter and opponent of Idaho's state health care exchange, is gaining
support among all those Idahoans who have experienced the cancellation of
their health insurance and increased cost and deductibles of their new
health insurance policies. The only way that Gov Otter can redeem
himself and possibly retain his governorship of the state of Idaho is to
immediately repeal Idaho's state health care exchange. If he doesn't,
it may well be bye-bye to fake Libertarian Otter. As we have said over
and over for the last decade, Gov Otter is a Republican-on-Monday,
Democrat-on-Tuesday, RINO-on-Wednesday, left-Liberal-on-Thursday,
Libertarian-on-Friday, Cowboy-on-Saturday, and Catholic-on-Sunday.
Ya-yesss, the boy's just an Everybody Man; he's for Everything all the time
and Everywhere. Which means, as The Beatles sang, "He's a real nowhere
Dec 05 Very few people understand the moral philosophical principles
underlying President Barack Obama's motives for creating and implementing a
nationalized health care system, the Affordable Care Act, commonly called
Obamacare. What are those principles and where did they come from?
First, President Obama believes in altruistic state collectivism, not just
for health care but for every commodity and service in the market. His
dictum is: "from each according to his ability, to each according to
his need." In other words, all goods and services should be
distributed by the government, and the basis for that distribution should be
"needs-based." Obama's view: screw the producer, the other half
of the exchange process. In the field of health care, President Obama
consulted the brother of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's previous Chief of Staff and
now Chicago's first Jewish mayor. [Note: now
there's a contradiction in terms: a Muslim Brotherhood's President (Obama)
with a Jewish Chief of Staff. Go figure.] Rahm Emanuel's
brother is Ezekiel Emanuel, a medical doctor at the National Institute of
Health (NIH) and a member of that institution's Bio Ethical Department.
Ezekiel Emanuel and other MD's published many papers such as an article in
Lancet in 2009 regarding how to ethically choose which patients should
receive how much, if any, of which treatment, from flu shots to organ
transplants. The moral philosophical basis for Ezekiel's so-called
bio-ethical choices all rest upon the philosophical foundation of the idea
of people as cogs in a state collective, with the government's function
being the redistribution broker. Which means the function of the
government doctors -- along with bureaucrats -- is to ration medical
services and commodities to the members of society as per their "usefulness"
to the state collective. Contrast that ideology to: individual rights
to freely exchange, private property, and free market capitalism. In
the latter, goods and commodities are only rationed until the market forces
bring supply to demand. And then prices drop. In a socialist
system, there are no free market prices to even determine if there is a
market shortage in one of the many millions of related services or
commodities that result in finished products. Bureaucrats set fake
prices using Sears Mail Order Catalogues, as they did in the USSR. So,
right off the bat, President Obama followed the ridiculous advice of a group
of so-called bio-ethical medical doctors at the NIH who not only hold
metaphysical, epistemological, and moral philosophical views of state
collectivism -- i.e. socialism -- they co-authored papers in the medical
journal Lancet that not only discusses how to ration medical care but also
show charts for what former Alaskan Gov Sarah Palin called "Death Panels."
Ezekiel Emanuel's charts were called "Reaper Charts." Why?
Because they showed the age groups -- such as before age 15 and above age 60
-- that various types of medical care should be withheld based upon various
criteria such as the individual's usefulness to the state collective.
You may not have heard about Ezekiel Emanuel's "The Complete Lives System."
It's the intellectual underpinning for the Affordable Care Act, and it's
frightening. You can Google Ezekiel's articles for bio-ethics in
Lancet Medical Journals. Now let that morality sink into your brain
for a minute and you will start realizing what President Barack Obama and
his left Liberal administration is trying to shove down your throats with
Obamacare. Gov Palin had it correct: Obamacare is the moral
philosophical concretization of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel's state collectivist
ideology and that ideology's driving force for government rationing of
health care ultimately rests upon their "bio-ethical" premises underlying
their "Reaper Charts" -- or "Death Panels." This is the same ideology
that led to -- not at first, but the ultimate logical conclusion -- of
Adolph Hitler's national health care system that ended in The Holocaust as
it's final solution. Classes of individuals were declared "unfit" or
"not useful" for the political leaders' state collectivist regime. So
they, as a class of people, like America's class of youth under age 15 or
over age 60 in Ezekiel Emanuel's moral philosophy, are targets for
elimination under the 2,700 pages of Obamacare legislation -- plus 20,000
pages, so far, of IRS and other bureaucratic rules. Obamacare --
ridiculously called the Patient's Protection and Affordable Care Act -- is
one of the most evil and pernicious pieces of moral philosophy ever proposed
by an American President. Plain and simple, it is simply another form
of genocide couched in Hollywood marketing of the worse kind. For
doctors, Obamacare is blatantly against their Hippocratic Oath to save and
protect all life. Obama's current marketing campaign for the next 20
days before Christmas in 2013 is to try to gain the sanction of his and
Ezekiel Emanuel's victims, which is you. Your job is to vote in the
Elections of 2014 and dump all those politicians -- both Liberals and RINOs
-- who support Obamacare. It's worth your life.
Dec 03 Called "Evangelii Gaudium" (The Joy of the Gospel), Pope
Francis blamed the existence of money, free market capitalism, and -- by
implication -- the entire moral philosophy upon which rests the ideology of
individual rights, private property rights, and the foundation of a limited
government republic as the CAUSE of poverty throughout the world.
There are so many misconceptions and untruths underlying Pope Francis'
assumptions and thus erroneous conclusion that one wonders where to start to
refute them. Let's just hit the basic basics of economics and free
market philosophy. First, money per se in not bad. Money is
simply a medium of economic exchange, taking the place of direct barter
until said commodities/services can be exchanged. What Pope Francis is
erroneously referring to as the result of money and capitalism is actually
the result of fiat currency and the market being manipulated by the state
collectivists (fascists, communists, socialists, dictators) who have gotten
control of our paper and credit money supply, namely the Federal Reserve and
all other national central banks. But these manipulators are not free
market capitalists and their manipulated money is not backed by anything.
They are counterfeiters. Pope Francis -- like most people -- does not
understand what money is and what constitutes the foundational ideas of free
market economics. So he erroneously believes the propaganda spewed out
daily by government news media and thus blames the wrong group and for the
wrong reasons. In short, the Pope is rather ignorant about basic
social-political-economics. It is government intervention into the
free market, going off the gold and silver standard for money, and the
philosophy of Karl Marx -- from each according to their ability, to each
according to their needs -- that has brought poverty to a large portion of
the world. Prices of products under true capitalism tend toward zero
as capital is accumulated; "prices" under socialism tends toward infinity --
i.e. absence of goods on the shelves -- as there are no real "prices" under
socialism, only government mandated math values stuck up on items or issued
with ration cards. Does capitalism get rid of all crooks? Of
course not. But that's the only reason for government: to
protect and adjudicate law breakers. Does socialism get rid of crooks?
Absolutely not, and, in fact, it routes the most vicious clever crooks
directly into positions of government power where they are in charge of
making up the laws to protect their criminal actions. Capitalism
produces the highest quality of life for the most people than any other
arrangement because it is founded upon principles of individual rights and
responsibilities. Socialism is founded upon dog-eat-dog vicious
politics. Pope Francis, in attacking free market capitalism and not
defining what money really is, does himself and his global congregation a
huge disservice by drawing wrong conclusions from wrong foundational
assumptions. His ideas are not defending the poor; his ideas are
sending them into the very poverty he is complaining about. Note that
Pope Francis and President Obama have come to the same fallacious economic
conclusions... based upon the same fallacious economic sophisms. And
hence the birth of Liberals in the US and their continued fallacious
education from K - University Phds in the Marxist philosophy of altruistic
Dec 03 The NY Times wrote a Pablum piece about President Obama's
broken National Socialist Health Care Web Site and slopped over the real
problems by talking about nonsensical bull$hit. The Wikipedia
definition of "Pablum" is that it's a baby food cereal product derived from
the word "pabulum," which means "foodstuff." "The word can also refer
to something that is bland, mushy, unappetizing, or infantile," says
Wikipedia and that is a great description of Obama's crashing Web Site
Healthcare.gov, not to mention the program as a whole. The NY Times
article -- in it's characteristically left Liberal manner -- tried to appear
FOXY "fair and balanced" but anybody who knows anything about designing and
implementing computer software systems knows better. Fortunately, so
do most of the users who have by now lost their current insurance coverage.
The major problem of course is not computer software per se; it is the
simple fact that socialism can never work and no amount of technology can
change that fact. But just for fun, lets' delve briefly into some of
Healthcare.gov's software/technology problems. First, they did not
have a real project manager. A real project manager coordinates all
phases of a project from beginning to end. Only in the last month did
the Obamacare idiots discover they needed a "systems integrator."
Which is another word for PROJECT MANAGER, you know, with a project
management plan book. And they needed tools such as Critical Path
Management (CPM) to discover which series of tasks fall on the critical path
and thus need special attention. My personal experience includes 40
years of project coding, analysis, project management, system integration,
testing, CPM and Branch Management of multiple simultaneous projects in the
Pacific Northwest. One project included developing and implementing
MicroSoft's international financials with a project manager,
programmers/analysts, and other techies. We were the consultants doing
the work; MicroSoft provided other software and user/client personnel.
When one of my programmers missed a flight, I rolled up my sleeves (even as
Pacific Northwest Branch Mgr) and wrote some of the code myself. The
system was a success and we broke out the champagne during an after project
review. The point is, when I read things such as Healthcare.gov
contains 500 million lines of code, one can only wonder what the hell is
going on. Nobody would write 500 million lines of code these days
unless they were just trying to bleed the consulting dollars out of a stupid
client. In the old days, 1st Generation software was written in 0's
and 1's: called binary code. 2nd General software was written in
Assembler Language, a step up from binary. 3rd Generation software was
written in COBOL and FORTRAN, mainly, and 4th Generation software was
written in high level English with most subroutines already built it.
One doesn't need to re-invent so many lines of code. To put it in
perspective, several hundred or even a thousand lines of COBOL can equal one
line of 4th GL. So one can see, as Prof Codd at IBM showed,
Development in a 4GL saved companies millions of dollars in project time
with very few errors, relatively speaking. Today, one uses 4GL and
Object Oriented coding (OO) that should save tons and tons of time,
especially in testing and gorilla-proofing one's design, testing,
integration, and implementation of any project. So, the Big Question
about Obama's Healthcare.gov software project is: what the hell level
of software writing is being used to crank out this piece of crap?
Binary? Assembler? 3GL? What the... ? So, there was no
project management, way too many lines of code (which is why it took 3 years
to produce pure garbage and cost so much and overran the schedule, which did
not exist, i.e. no CPM), and on top of it all: socialism for any
commodity or service cannot succeed due strictly to basic economics, mainly,
the destruction of price formations which can only occur in a true free
market. Forget the technology; it's economics that will kill Obamacare.
The NY Times Pablum piece in which several writers wringed their little
hannies about what Obama and his minions should do next to save their asses,
misses the entire point. It doesn't matter how many "gurus" you throw
at Healthcare.gov, it doesn't solve the economic reality and it violates
every American citizen's rights of privacy to their own mind, body, and
health. Valerie Jarrett, HHS Sec Sebelius and Barack Obama, along with
a few selected other Socialists in Congress (Democrats and RINOs), should be
ridden out of town on a wooden rail with lots of splinters up their
ridiculous little butts. $650 million dollars to write 500 million
lines of code? Hey, somebody just robbed the taxpayers again... Big
Nov 29 We all knew this scenario was bound to happen due to the
Obamacare roll out: a seven year old boy with cancer who was receiving
chemotherapy has just been dropped from his health care insurance due to the
rules in Obamacare. Let's analyze this for a nanosecond. The
reason all the Liberals clamored for a national socialist government
health care system in the first place was because they said
they needed to save all the poor little children in the world who needed -- and had a "right to receive"
-- health care from somebody, which we all know must be the health care
professionals since we also know that one doesn't receive health care from
the government; the government is only acting as the redistribution broker
with hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats showing up to read each other's
reports in quadruplicate. While Liberals granted "rights to receive"
for the poor little children, they ignored those same
rights of the doctors. In other words, "rights" were redefined on a
philosophical foundation of "needs-based." Your "right to receive" is
based upon the subjective determination of how "needy" you are. Or who
your friends are in The Capital, Washington DC. The Liberals are great
at creating "most needy" lists and dumping private property rights and the
free market. So along comes Obamacare with its ridiculous government
health care rules,
and ends up canceling the health care policies of the very children they were
clamoring to save. Duh, what a contradiction. More importantly,
how arrogant is it for
anybody (like Obama and his Board of Health Care Bureaucrats) to claim that they have the knowledge to replace the trillions and
trillions of automatic decisions in the free market with their own
subjective decisions? Not only do the Liberals destroy the creation of
free market prices (which tend toward zero in any true free market), they
then make it impossible for ANY type of market for that commodity to exist
because, having destroyed the free market mechanism that allows prices to
form, nobody can then make economic calculations or business decisions vis
a vis supply and demand, which has been distorted with government
regulations. So not only is the process of implementing a national
health care system a Fool's Errand at face value, it is
impossible to "correct" this aberration with different/new/additional
government regulations because the basic foundation is wrong. The only
solution to the absurdities of a nationalized health care system is, of course, the complete abolishment of Obamacare.
This is true, in general, of any socialist intervention into the free
market. The bad joke is that neither President Obama, HHS Secretary Sebilius, all the computer geniuses in the world, or anybody else can --
according to basic laws of free market economics -- create a national health care system
-- or any national economic services/commodities system -- because the very
act of trying to create such a centrally-managed system is the very act that
destroys it. Economist F. A. Hayek won a Nobel Prize in Economics by
showing that prices (exchange ratios) can only be formed in a free market:
the subjective theory of price formation. To claim that anybody --
like the government -- can simply create any ol' price for any ol' commodity
or service in the market misses the point: if it isn't done in
freedom, it doesn't reflect supply and demand reality or the desires of the
consumers. Insurers do not set health care prices in a free market;
consumers set all prices in a true free market. If Liberals don't like
free market prices, they are, de facto, telling all consumers to go to Hell.
Back to the contradiction in the premises of Obamacare -- and socialism in
general: Socialism usually brings about exactly the opposite of their
intended desire: "affordable health care insurance." We now have
another perfect example of how the stupid Liberals -- not understanding even
the basics of free market economics, or private property rights, or
individual rights to voluntarily exchange commodities and services in an
open market -- created the very problem that they said they were going to
solve: namely, screwing over a seven year old boy with cancer by
implementing a government health care program (Obamacare) that forces him to
lose his health care during his cancer treatment with his doctor. Obamacare
must be abolished and we must allow a free market in all commodities and services.
Those stupid Liberals who claim we cannot go back to the health care system
that existed previous to Obamacare are not telling the truth: i.e.,
the health care system that existed previous to Obamacare was NOT a free
market system. It was the Liberal's Lyndon Johnson's Great Society
GOVERNMENT-MANAGED health care system with Medicare that existed before
Obamacare, with insurance monopolies established in every state in the
union, citizens not allowed to buy competing health insurance across state
lines, not to mention all the government Medicare intervention and
exorbitant costs, including billions of dollars in waste and fraud. We
must go back further, to our founding principles and bring back individual
rights, private property, and true free market capitalism. Otherwise,
government health care will bankrupt the entire American economy, just like
it has in Europe and other Third World nations.
Nov 28 Three women -- one from Idaho -- have just passed the Marines'
infantry combat obstacle school and now qualify for positions on the front
line, or wherever it may be that soldiers participate in hand-to-hand
combat. Previous to last year, women in the US Military were not
allowed to be assigned to infantry combat positions. Women could fly
combat aircraft but not duke it out as a ground pounder. While it's
obvious that these women are capable of running obstacle courses and
climbing walls, there is the bigger question of a commanding officer trying
to run a combat unit with the additional psychological problems of
male-female close living quarters. I will leave it to your imagination
about all the infinite number of relationships -- good and bad, depending on
each trooper's position -- that will now be added to, and thus affect, the
combat equation. The target objective of a combat mission can now
become more complicated by male-female relationships within the unit,
including jealousy, that could greatly affect how the unit now reacts during
infantry combat. A further problem is what the enemy may think of
women soldiers that they capture, especially Middle East Muslims who do not
regard women as equals, and thus will treat them worse than captured men.
There is no Geneva Convention in the vocabulary of the Middle East Muslim
terrorists. How would you, as a US CO in combat, like to send a Mom
with two children into ground combat in Afghanistan -- even if she can climb
a wall and run with a 60-lb back pack (which is a stupid set of criteria in
the first place and which places the current US Military in about the same
absurd conditions required by the British military that the Colonists
defeated in the American Revolution). There is a big difference
between women obtaining full equal rights, and the concept of "equality."
Women are not equal to men in physical ability or else the Olympics would
have removed the men-women parameter a long time ago. Three women who
can perform the same physical abilities as men on a marine obstacle course
does not remove all the psychological problems that they bring to the
male-female combat arena. Before you cheer that men and women in the
military are now all equal, be very careful what you wish for. For
those of you who have never served in a war zone, be very careful how you
judge this new military "equality" for women: infantry combat.
Nov 28 US Dictator-President Barack Obama has just broken the law
again. Now what? The Affordable Ha Ha Affordable Health Care Law
mandates that small businesses must start participating in the ACA next
week. This is the law. It is not just a guideline passed by
Congress. It is the law, just like all the other laws passed by
Congress and subject to judicial and statutory regulations. But now,
as of yesterday, Dictator-President Barack Obama has just declared that
small businesses do not have to start enrolling their employees into the
Affordable Ha Ha Affordable Health Care system until Nov 15, 2014, two weeks
after the 2014 Elections for Congress. What a coincidence. And
what a law-breaking action this is. No president or US Congress person
or judge can just pop up one morning and declare that certain sections or
clauses of a US law can be arbitrarily changed. This can only be done
by Congress by going through its legislative procedures as outlined in the
US Constitution. That is why we have checks and balances between the
three branches of government: to prevent the exact dictatorial actions
that Obama has taken. US Dictator-President Barack Obama is now
embarking upon dangerously litigious territory: unconstitutionally
declaring changes in various laws, specifically his ACA Obamacare Law.
The Big Question: will the US Congress just sit on their thumbs and
pretend that US Dictator-President Barack Obama can rewrite their
legislation any ol' time he feels like it? Or will somebody in
Congress finally grow a pair of cajones and call the President's on his
illegal action? By the way, some additional 50 - 100 million people
may well lose their current health care insurance as Obamacare kicks in and
employers figure out that it's cheaper to not cover their employees through
the ACA. Ceteris paribus, if nothing else changes, all private
insurance companies will soon go out of business and the Obama thugs will
have obtained the single payer government system -- a national socialist
health care system -- which was their goal in the first place. Anybody
who didn't see this coming is blind as a bat. Like, who is John Galt?
-- Tue Nov 26
Two major problems with the Obama Administration inking a fake Peace Treaty
with Iran: (1) The US should have taken action to completely
halt all existing and new implementations of nuclear power plants in Iran
because the Muslim Mullahs will simply continue their goal of manufacturing
war-grade uranium for nuclear bombs, and (2) The US should be taking the
lead to stop all current usage of nuclear power plants both in America and
all over the world because nuclear power plants are unsafe for a number of
reasons, the least of which is that they can blow sky high from either
another nation's electronic blast in our atmosphere or a huge solar flare
from our sun. The later is according to information from -- bear with
me on this -- Billy Meier and his ongoing conversations with ET humans (the
Plejaren) from Eros in the DERN system. Whether you believe that there
exist other extra-terristrial humans in our Milky Way Galaxy and throughout
the rest of the universe at large, you should check out their information
and pay close attention to what they have to say about planet Earth.
Earth humans, according to the Plejaren, do not yet have the technology nor
the knowledge to be using nuclear power plants, and, in fact, the Plejaren
give examples about how on another planet their forefathers made the same
mistake with nuclear power plants before a solar eruption in their system
blew their nuclear plants sky high and made much of their planet
uninhabitable. So, besides the fact that the Iran religious dictators,
the Mullahs, are lying about their future peaceful use of nuclear power
plants, they -- like all nations on Earth -- would be wise to start planning
the usage of alternate sources of energy such as free energy from the vacuum
(space) that Tesla already demonstrated to us 100 years ago vs. nuclear or
non-reusable bio fuels. Of course, that would mean that the oil and
banking industries who are big lobbyists -- playing the role of corporate
welfare, which is SOCIALISM or state collectivism, not free market
capitalism -- in the US Congress and with the Obama Administration will do
everything they can to retain their state interventionist position.
Even from Iran's lying point of view, they do not need to create nuclear
power plants because they're sitting on billions of dollars of tradable oil
to China and Russia. Not advocating that they should use bio fuels;
just saying this fact belies their true interests in cranking up their phony
nuclear power plants. They aren't Greenies and the cost to build
nuclear power plants are not cheap. The worst part of the deal that
the Obama Administration just made with Iran is that the Mullahs' fairytale
religion of Islam contains the edict that it is OK to blow up the entire
Earth because they are so horny they fantasize about the supposed thrill of
raping 72 virgins. Thanks, Barack. You may well have paved
several paths to the Earth's ultimate destruction: solar flare blow
ups or the Mullahs detonating enough nuclear bombs to accomplish the same
thing. Never mind the low level nuclear energy that is currently being
emitted by all existing nuke power plants that Earth scientists do not know
about -- unless they read Billy Meier's FIGU web site, which they will not
because they are having a big chuckle about the existence of ET humans in
the first place. How arrogant. And how small minded when you
think about the size of the universe.
Nov 25 Now that Dictator Obama thinks he has made a peace treaty with
the Muslim Dictators of Iran, how soon will it be before Iran creates a
"dirty" suitcase nuke, loads nuclear warheads on missiles, and launches
"Ali Akbar" against the rest of the non-Muslim world? Will it be
faster than Hitler's launching of WW II against Europe immediately after
signing a mutual non-aggression treaty in Munich with Britain's Neville
Nov 23 The Making of a Dictator, or
How Does One Evolve From a Mild
Mannered President Into a Raving Dictator? First, the mild mannered
president pops up with a childish idea, such as, let's say, oh... I know,
let's use the collective coercive force of government to provide healthcare
to every citizen in the nation. Based upon what ideology? Based
upon, hmm let me think, oh yeah the idea that one person, or group of
people, have the inherent right to receive the fruits of another person's
labor. Namely, citizens have the right to receive medical care from
doctors. Which means that doctors have the reciprocal right to receive
toilet cleaning and rental cars from other citizens. I mean, like,
fair is fair, right? And the role of government? The mild
mannered President and 16,000 new IRS agents get to be the Distributor of
Medical Care Rights, Toilet Cleaning Rights, and Rental Car Rights. I mean, fair is fair,
right? Plumbers and car rental agents get medical care as an inherent
right, and the doctors get clean toilets and rental cars as an inherent
right. Fair is fair. Expanding on this wonderful idea, the
everybody now has the right to receive free commodities and services
from everybody else with the mild mannered -- but now rather aggressive --
President acting as Santa Claus. Then, after dumping the free market
-- the only environment in which prices for all commodities and services can
be created in order for businesses to be able to make calculations and
forecast whether (and in which order) economic tasks can be performed -- the
mild mannered aggressive President's We Will
Redistribute Everything Law collapses and burns. No
problem. Now the
mild mannered, aggressive, angry President blames the health industry, the
plumbers, and the car rental agencies for the collapse of what the mild
mannered, aggressive, angry and ranting President just knows deep in his
heart should be working -- just like he learned at Harvard University from
reading Marx and Engels. When all the future milestones to implement
the mild mannered, aggressive, angry, ranting President's Non-Affordable,
Non-Accessible, Non-Existent medical care, clean toilets, and rental cars
continue to fail, the mild mannered, aggressive, angry, ranting and raving
President declares martial law, suspends the US Constitution, abolishes
Congress and the US Supreme Court and begins loading doctors, plumbers, and
car rental agents into cattle cars and shipping them off to Auschwitz,
Illinois -- about five miles north of Chicago. Why? Because everybody in the
nation is responsible for the failure of what the mild mannered, aggressive,
angry, ranting and raving President knew would have worked if only all the
bastards in the nation had fully cooperated with him, his Regime, and the ideas of Karl
Marl and Grimm's Fairytales.
Nov 22, 2013 Here's the Big Question of The Day: Did the Obama
Administration cleverly and knowingly orchestrate the failure of Obamacare's
roll out on purpose or are they simply as incompetent as they appear?
First, let's trek down Logic Path A that assumes Obamacare was, and is,
being engineered to fail at all levels in order to reach the goal of a
single payer government system: nationalized health care. (1) Obamacare is passed by Congress
with 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook that nobody has fully read or
understands. (2) US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts --
either acting under threats from the Obama Administration or delusions of
what constitutes "Constitutionality" -- introduces the term "tax" into the
Obamacare Bill in order to get around the term "fee," so he can rule (5-4)
that "taxes" are constitutional, and thus Obamacare is "constitutional."
This was necessary for the next steps. (3) The Obama Admin knowingly
rolls out a flawed and incomplete Healthcare.gov Web Site for people to try
to sign up for Obamacare. 5.5 million people lose their current
insurance and doctors, receive notices that double/triple or quadruple the
cost of a new insurance policy and/or deductibles, but cannot sign up on the
Healthcare Web Site because it's broken and the payment software programs have not
even been written yet. Which means nobody can or could have signed up. (4) President Obama pops up on national TV and
illegally pulls a new change to the Obamacare Law out of his ass and
declares that everybody can keep their previous insurance that the
Affordable Health Care Act "legally" says they can't. All of a sudden,
nobody knows what the real law is: the one Congress passed and the
President signed off on, or the latest change that Obama ad-libbed in a
rambling diatribe on national TV? Which direction do you go? Can
you, or a company, be sued if you, or a company, choose one direction or the other? Can the
government be sued? (5) Now that Obama has purposely dumped 5.5
million people off their current insurance policies, he and Valerie Jarrett
will next watch as 50 - 100 million employees lose their insurance polices
when employers discover that the costs are prohibitive and dump their
insurance coverage for employees. (6) Now, as planned, 150
million or more individuals have either no insurance, or have extremely high
insurance costs, or have now qualified for Medicare, Medicare that is now an
unfunded liability to the tune of $90 trillion or more dollars. (7)
Now that the entire health care system of the US has been completely wiped
out, the Obama Administration can finally blame the insurance companies, the
youth of America who chose to pay a fine rather than sign up to subsidize
everybody else's health care costs, and your grandmother's dog's left ear. (8)
Oh, what to do, what to do... "Oh, I know," says Obama. "We
simply have to morph the Obamacare system into a single payer, national
socialist government health care system. You know, the type of system
that we originally planned for and have arrived at by pretending to
implement a fake market-based health care system. Yahoo, thank you, my
dear little victims!" Welcome to Hell. Or let's take a quick
gander at the Logic for Path B, entitled, We Are Seriously Trying to
Implement Good Health Care But We Are Just a Bunch of Incompetents.
(1) Obama and the socialist Democrats pass Obamacare, not knowing
what's in the 2,700 pages of gobble-de-gook. (2) The IRS and HHS
add thousands more pages of contradictory rules. (3) The US Supreme
Court says Obamacare is "constitutional." See Chief Justice
John Roberts actions above. (4) The Obama Admin hires a
bunch of computer incompetents to write the software code and implement a totally
botched up Healthcare.gov Web Site that cost $680 million, 5 times or more
over budget, and the payment routines have not even been written. (5)
Obama shows up on national TV and lies again about virtually everything he
can think of. (6) The incompetent people rolling out Obamacare,
both at the techie computer level and the personal contract level, continue
stumbling along seriously trying to make everything work. Ha Ha,
seriously? (7) Obama's ratings fall lower than whale shit at the
bottom of the Pacific Ocean but he
and his cohorts continue to push Obamacare down Americans' throats in a "ha
ha serious" attempt to save everybody's health care. (8) The
system continues to blow up as more and more people lose their health care
insurance and the Obama Administration hopes and prays they win the 2014
Elections and the 2016 Elections to keep Obamacare floating all the way to
Hell and back. So which Path, national socialist A or faux serious B, do you think the Obama
Administration is traveling? Are they crafty little socialists who
have planned the crash and burn of the current health care system AND the
Affordable Care Act ON PURPOSE, or are they simply a bunch of dummies
stumbling down the path to Nowheresville because they still haven't figured
out that socialism doesn't work? My guess is that Obama is traveling
down Path A: Screwing it up on purpose to arrive at a national
socialist health care joke, plus traveling down Path B, namely they are
Seriously a Bunch of Dummies in the first place for trying to choose any
other path than free market capitalism.
Nov 18, 2013 Whoa, pull up the barn floor, pour yourselves another hot cup
of Rocket Java, shut up, and listen up, girl friends. Did the United
States of America just morph from a limited republic to a dictatorship
overnight? President Obama -- a month after his ridiculous heath care
Web Site rolled out and crashed over the cliff, causing 6 million people to
lose their current health care coverage -- strolled out in front of national
TV and said, "Oh $hee-it, man, I'm so sorry for lying to you that y'all
could actually keep your original health insurance policies and doctors.
Dang, and weren't you a bunch of fools to believe my crack-snorting little
ass, but ya-yesss, I take full blame -- cough-cough, make that full credit
-- for fumbling your health care lives on my own 1 yard line -- 'cause
that's about how far my program got (99 yards to go) before it blew sky high
on Oct 1, 2013. And now I promise, again, ha ha, fool you twice, that
the football game ain't over, that I will pick up this $684 million
over-budget football and run toward the 2 yard line before I fumble the ball
again because this game -- and I do mean "game" -- ain't over yet.
Ya-yesss, boys and girls, my little subordinate victims, I am now declaring
that I can just step up onto the national stage and claim that I have the
constitutional authority to change any law I desire and thus undo those
portions of Congress' Affordable Care Act that I think may be inconvenient
in my Obamacare Mess, for which I take full responsibility even though
it's not my fault. Double speak, double speak. Soooo, cough-cough, and I'm not standing here naked
as a Jay bird, y'all don't have to follow the original Obamacare law passed
by Congress. Follow whatever I last say on TV. There will be no
lawsuits, I promise. Ha ha, you dumb $hits. You don't have to
give up your health care policies for a whole year 'cause, well, because I
said so. And I'm above the law. Which law? All the laws.
Never mind that the original law -- which I just dumped with HARDLY ANY
OBJECTIONS FROM 535 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS -- says you got until Jan 1, 2014, to
comply. Forget about that law. I just declared a new law.
And, if I feel like it, I will override the new law tomorrow, and then that
next day, and then the following day until Hell freezes over. Whatever
I feel like because I am the CEO of America. And we are the Borg.
We all live in one big commune.
Congress, the US Constitution and all of our current laws are now irrelevant
until I say so in one of my Executive Orders. Left, right, left,
right... In fact, I am changing the freeway speeds in all 50
states from 65 MPH to 13 1/2 MPH as of, let's say, uh, midnight tonight, OK?
Why? To save the Borg's fuel costs and cut down on CO2 emissions on
Saturdays while we're driving to our nation's fantasy football games.
US laws are now only, well, you know, like, Temporary Guidelines. We
now have only one branch of government: the Executive Department,
better known as ME, Barack Obama." Yo-ho, yo-ho, a pirate's life for
Nov 12, 2013 Howdy Idahoinians: a whopping 100 Idahoans have signed up
for Gov Butch "The RINO" Otter's state healthcare exchange. Way to go,
Butch. We tried to tell you it was a bust and you tried to claim you
were a Libertarian. What a joke. 6 million Americans have lost
their health care insurance all across the US within the last month and a
half. Less than 50,000 of the anticipated 500,000 that were expected
by the Obama administration to have signed up by now have either paid for
Obamacare insurance or left their shopping carts on healthcare.gov without
signing up. 7 million Americans are necessary to sign up to even fund
Obamacare, which looks like it ain't gonna happen, folks. At the
current rate of signing up for O-Care, it might take a few hundred years to
get rolling. Like hello, we'll all be dead by then. Healthcare.gov
Nov 11, 2013 Think about this: The IRS, the taxing agency that has
been chosen to monitor, implement and enforce our nation's new national
socialist health care system with 16,000 new IRS agents, has sent over 650
income tax refunds to the same address. This means that the
programming in the IRS computer system is just as bad or worse than the
computer system underlying Obamacare. How difficult is it for the IRS
programmers to write the following simple routine: (1) sort all the
IRS refund checks by address, and (2) if the current address equals the last
address, flag this data item. I mean, come on, this is simple Computer
For Idiots 101A and the IRS has not implemented this type of error checking
in its refund program? So now we have to ask the question: What
sort of error checking has been implemented in the botched up Obamacare
system? None? This system has cost the taxpayers $680 million,
with an original budget estimated at $80 million. If any private
company had received an initial estimate of $80 million to create a computer system
and the cost approached double, $160 million, the project would have come to
a complete halt and heads would have rolled. So what happened when the
cost of Obamacare passed double and approached triple? Nothing.
How about quadruple, $320 million? Nothing. How about quintuple,
$400 million? Nothing. How about adding in the fact that the
system would not be completed on time? Nothing. And the "project
manager" and HHS Secretary Sebelius are still busy trying to "fix" whatever
is wrong with their ridiculously overrun Obamacare project while Congress
sits on their thumbs and says, "Oh well." President Obama pretends
everything is on schedule and it will be a great system. Millions of
citizens have already lost their current health care coverage and Obama says
their health care policies were substandard and they will get better coverage under Obamacare --
if they can ever log on to sign up. But this train wreck is just the tip of the
ice berg. Look at the IRS system, sending $4 billion to duplicate
addresses. This is the type of error checking you can expect to
find in whatever the future Obamacare system ends up as, too. And the IRS, who can't
even clean up their own system, is in charge of the Obamacare system?
Just think, all we really needed to do was to dump the current health care
system that the government implemented over the last 50 years, go back to
the free market, and start over. The free market is not the cause of
our previous lousy health care system; but it IS the solution. Same
for the USPS, Amtrak, and all the other government bureaucracies that have
intervened into the free market. Once again, health care is not a
right. No commodities or services are rights. Health care is a
marketable commodity and if the government would get out of the way, prices
would plummet, just like for all other commodities in an open market. Obamacare doesn't need more time; it needs to be abolished.
Nov 02, 2013 Newsflash to all Left Liberals: before Obamacare, the
health care system operating in the US was NOT a free market system.
It was -- and has been for the last 50 years -- operating, technically
speaking, in a quasi fascist economic system. Fascism is defined as
the state issuing government rules to control the means of production.
Socialism is defined as the state taking over and actually trying to run the
means of production. So, Obamacare is not replacing a previous free
market health care system. Obamacare is replacing a previous fascist health
care system which -- since President Lyndon Johnson intervened with his
Great Society -- has been screwing up America's health care with all its
governmental interventions for the last 50 years. Obamacare is simply
another variation, an extension, on our previous state collectivism. And it, too,
will fail for all the same basic economic reasons that its predecessor was
failing. Obamacare, stripping away the veil of the government acting
as the robbery broker, is nothing more than one group of individuals stating
that they have the right to demand that doctors and health care
professionals must provide them with health care. In other words, the
rights of doctors are supposedly subservient to others who are demanding
that doctors owe them their health care services as a natural right.
But this defines a master-slave relationship, American citizens being cast
as the masters and doctors cast as the slaves. In a free market
system, American citizens and doctors would be voluntarily exercising their
rights to choose which health care services they want to exchange. In
a free market system, nobody has a right to demand that another person must
be his/her economic slave and thus must provide their services or products
as a so-called right. Medical care is, therefore, not a right.
It is simply an exchangeable service or commodity in the free market.
This is true for all services and commodities in the market, including
education, cars, food, computers, etc. Nobody's services should be
somebody else's demand to receive as a right. Otherwise, we are simply
establishing a culture of slavery. Rights are not exchangeable
commodities. Rights are individual freedoms, not commodities and services.
Freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, association, etc. are not
bought and sold commodities in a free market. And this is where
Liberals get very confused. They first distance themselves from their
robberies by using the government as their robbery brokers and then claim
that they have a right to other people's commodities and services.
Thus, they create government robbery programs and give them fancy names such
as The Great Society, Social Security, Medicare, The Affordable Care Act,
and so on, as if it's not a robbery if they use the government to perform
the robbery for them. And the more people who commit the robbery, the
less of a robbery it becomes? The real irony is how the victims in this great
government robbery scheme often fail to reason what is really going on and
begin calling for the very robbery that robs them in their own profession.
Teachers and doctors do this all the time, and then wonder why their
profession starts crumbling into total disarray as the government performs
its robbery duties. Hence we get monstrosities such as Leave No Child
Behind, Race To The Top, and Obamacare. The predictable end result:
civil war and The Holocaust, since, in reality, reciprocal rip-off rights
can never be implemented and somebody must be blamed. Remember,
Obamacare is not about health care; it is about individual rights vs.
coerced state collectivism.
Oct 30, 2013 Lying through his teeth, President Barack Obama claimed over
two dozen times, "If you like your current health care plan and doctor, I
guarantee that you will be able to keep them under Obamacare." Lied?
Yes, lied, because he already knew damn well, as far back as 2010, that some
60% to 70% of individuals would not only lose their individual health
care plans but that the cost of new health care plans would greatly
increase. This was no accident. The President and his advisors
have planned this canard for the last 4 years and were advised by both
health care professionals and the IRS that individual costs would skyrocket.
While the President claimed that everybody's existing plan would be
"grandfathered in," and that everybody could keep their existing plan, HHS
AND the IRS issued rulings that CHANGED the definition of "grandfathered in"
so that if insurance companies did anything such as change a premium or
merged with another company or fed a Doggie Bon Bon to their dog, then the
"grandfathered in" definition does not apply. Hence the
Obama Administration knew from the
outset that virtually nobody in this category (14 million individuals) would
be able to keep their existing plans, and thus begets the Big Lie. Why
did Obama and his handler Ms. Valerie Jarrett lie? Because their REAL
GOAL is for Obamacare to fail so that they can move the United States
onto a government-run national socialist health care system. And
that's why this entire health care debacle is so troubling: namely,
those in charge have known all along that their ultimate goal was to move us
onto a nationalized health care system, which is tantamount to
institutionalizing fascism for at least one-sixth of the American economy.
Once again, as we listen to the Obamacare congressional health care
hearings, we must remember that the real issue is individual rights, not the
cost of the system or when will errors be corrected or any other empirical
parameters. That's like arguing during the Third Reich in Germany in
the 1930s about the parameters and problems in shipping Jews off to
re-education camps rather than the question of individual rights of Jews
being shipped off to anywhere. Who cares about the problems and
parameters of a government program that is violating individual rights when
it is the moral philosophy of the violation of individual rights that should
be of major concern? Let's face it, if the government can violate one
of your rights to implement a program, then we have established the
precedent for the government to violate ALL the rights of everybody to
In other words, once the Republicans on the health care committee accept the
premise that it is OK to violate the individual's right to choose in an
economic exchange process, then they have lost the debate. Accept a
false premise, and you have already lost the argument. That's --
unfortunately -- where we are today: not arguing about individual
rights but rather how best to violate said rights. What trait for the
commodity we call health care exempts it from all the basic laws of free
market economics? Does free market economics really fall apart
depending upon the specific commodity or service being exchanged? Really?
If so, then perhaps the laws of physics changes in different galaxies, too.
Wow, what a discovery: no universal rights for humans and no universal laws
Oct 30, 2013 Surprise-a-roonie! US Senator Diane Feinstein's hubster,
Richard Blum, is the president of CRI, the real estate company that has the
exclusive right to sell $19 billion worth of closed USPS buildings. No
conflict of interest? CRI stands to rake in from 2% to 6% of the $19
billion, which may well reach a billion dollars in commissions. Wow,
don't the rich and well connected in politics just keep on keeping on.
Oct 27, 2013 Well, well, well. Looks like the Tea Party and other
Libertarian groups can now say, "I told you so!" The roll out of Obamacare on its online
Web Site, healthcare.gov, has been a total disaster. Millions
have tried to log on. Only a few thousand -- or less in many states -- have succeeded in
traversing the computer obstacles to obtain some
kind of health insurance, mostly at a higher cost that their previous
insurance. Policies cost a lot more than
citizens expected. No, Obama, citizens did not get to keep their
current insurance. Obama lied. And if you don't obtain health insurance by next
March or whenever the Affordable Health Care law mandates, you will be
"TAXED" not fined by the IRS. The difference between a
"fine" and a "tax" being the distinction by which Chief Justice of the US
Supreme Court, John Roberts, ruled that Obamacare was constitutional
because taxation (not a fine) is legal. What a stretch that was: Justice Roberts had to first introduce the term "tax" into the
Obamacare law in order to then rule that a "fine" could morph into a "tax." Now that
Obamacare has rolled out -- and over the cliff into nowheresville -- we have the televised spectacle
of a Congressional committee trying to find out what went wrong. Why
is healthcare.gov bombing out all over the place? Why did it cost $684
million, 5-6 times more than originally estimated? All the project vendors
working on this Healthcare Titanic are simply pointing
fingers at each other or CMS -- the government entity responsible for
implementing the ACA under HHS Secretary Sebelius who didn't bother to show
up to this important Congressional meeting. Meanwhile, President Obama is busy
giving a news conference in the Pink Room of the While House, blabbering
about how badly the US needs to grant amnesty to 20 million illegal Mexicans
who he expects to vote for the Democrats in the future. What does he care about the total
train wreck of Obamacare? He's busy buying future left Liberal votes.
Back to the congressional hearing on why Obama's healthcare.gov Web Site is
a total failure, the excuses coughed up by the computer project vendors who
failed -- along with CMS and HHS -- are a real hoot. It is obvious
that there was NO project management whatsoever. The project is five
times over budget. Over $600 million dollars for an initially
estimated $90 million computer project. When asked why didn't the lead
computer company inform CMS whether the project would bomb or not, a Ms.
Campbell (in charge of CGI Federal) responded with, "It wasn't our
responsibility to advise CMS whether the system should be a go or no-go."
Errrt, screech, halt! Are you kidding? It is exactly the project
vendor's prime responsibility to inform the client -- CMS and HHS -- about
whether the project should be implemented or not. In fact, this should
have been done long before the budget doubled, tripled, quadrupled, and
quintupled. Ms. Campbell is a total
incompetent. So is CMS, and Sec of HHS Sebelius, and President Obama
for not asking a simple question: namely, hey guys, where are we on
the healthcare.gov project? And it wasn't the prime vendor's
responsibility to provide status reports? Or Sec of HHS Sebelius'
responsibility to demand status reports?
Wow, see how wonderful state collectivism works? And if you don't sign
up soon on this broken Obamacare Health Care system, the
IRS will come knocking on your door and FINE -- oops, I mean TAX -- your ass.
Ironically, Obama and RINO politicians such as Sen. John McCain have asked
private enterprise from Silicon Valley to show up to solve healthcare.gov's computer
problems. You know, the private sector that the government says is why
they had to transfer our nation's health care system to the government in
the first place. Because the free market and private enterprise are
pig pirate capitalists, right? Now it's "help, help, help us fix our Health Care
Train Wreck!" What a contradiction.
But here's the real problem:
Obamacare is an individual rights issue, not an argument about empirical
data results. Obamacare is a violation of your individual right to
choose which services or commodities you want to trade or exchange or
purchase in a free and open market. This issue is not about how much
Obamacare costs or whether it was implemented on time or what the parameters
of the online system will be. And now we have the spectacle of
Republican and Democrat politicians screaming at each other on nationalized
TV about the empirical results of the online system while virtually NOBODY
is zeroing in on the real issue: namely, Obamacare must be abolished
not because the rollout of healthcare.gov doesn't work, but because it is a violation of your
individual rights. Note: Obamacare is not "settled law."
It is what is called "pretended law." Pretended law remains in force
until it is challenged and overturned by -- in this case -- another Supreme
Court judgment or via the US Congress or via the people. There are
various constitutional appeals winding their way through the court system
today that could easily overturn Obamacare, one of which is that the "fee"
clause which Justice Roberts relied upon to redefine as a "tax" did not
originate in the US House. It originated in the US Senate. This
is a violation of the Constitution's Origination Clause, which
rightfully belongs to the US House, not the US Senate. The Origination
Clause states that fees, including taxes, must originate in the House, not
the Senate. The US Supreme
Court could overturn ALL of Obamacare on this one issue alone. Let's
hope this happens.
Oct 13, 2013 What are we learning from the so-called "government shutdown?"
First, the government is not shutting down. Taxes are still being
collected and millions of government workers are still showing up to work.
The Federal Reserve is still printing up billions of fake dollars, still
backed by nothing, and the banks are making billions of dollars in interest
on the national debt. So what's really happening? What are we
finding out? For one thing, we are discovering how the Obama
administration is using the "government shutdown" -- which Obama and the
Democrats in the US Senate have caused -- to purposely hurt as many
Americans as possible in order to further their political goals:
namely, to shove a national socialist health care system down everybody's
throats. There are numerous examples on national TV showing how
President Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder have, for instance,
called out the police or national guard to erect blockades to monuments in
Washington DC at which there were no previous barriers to tourists.
This is spiteful and highly political. We have discovered that out of
16,000 EPA workers, some 15,000 have been furloughed or deemed
non-essential. This means that some 99% of the EPA should not even be
employed as government bureaucrats and begs the question: What the hell are
these EPA 'workers' doing at 'work' everyday besides pushing paper in
circles and destroying the private market with tons and tons of ridiculous
roadblocks? The assumption that free market capitalism is the
destroyer of the environment -- and thus the presumed need for 16,000
Government Greenie Cops -- does not bear out in either economic theory or
empirical data. Free market corporations must respond to the consumer
and it is in their best interests to do everything they can to protect the
environment. Or they don't sell products. And if they don't sell
products, they go bankrupt. Whenever free market companies violate the
environment, it is usually due to previous government regulations that
allowed or even encouraged them to do so and more likely than not were
passed by lobbyists bribing Congress. That is not the free market.
We already have enough laws vis a vis private property rights to prosecute
those companies or individuals who pollute the environment. It is
governmental intervention on behalf of corporate welfare lobbyists that then
encourage the Greenie Cops to create another governmental entity -- the EPA
-- to try and monitor what the government previously allowed to happen to
the environment illegally in the first place. It's the left Liberal
vicious economic circle. This does not describe free market
capitalism; it is a description of state collectivism. Dump the
special interest legislation that allows companies to violate the
environment and then you do not need an EPA. In truth, the EPA -- as
well as most all other governmental state protectionist bureaucracies --
were not created to protect the individual or the environment. They
were created to allow one company to "legally" beat up on their competitors
in the market. Left Liberal politicians know this; the American public
has yet to figure it out. So what else have we learned about America's
budget during this "government shutdown?" For one thing, we have
learned that 25% of the SSI budget -- Social Security "disability"
recipients, not the old folks receiving retirement benefits -- is
fraudulent. Hundreds of billions of dollars in the SSI portion of the
Social Security budget is being distributed to unscrupulous doctors and
lawyers submitting phony claims. If the Tea Party Republicans in the
US House had not been submitting the budget piece-meal to the US Senate,
nobody would have paid attention to this. Which also begs the bigger
question: how many other portions of the US budget -- now up to $7
trillion in debt, doubled from $3 trillion by the Obama administration alone
within the last 5 years -- is chock full of fraud and waste? The best
thing we can do during this "government shutdown" is to force Congress to
review and cut back on every line item in the US budget. You know,
just like you have to do with your own personal budget every year.
Unless of course you have a monetary printing press in your basement and can
"legally" crank up $3 trillion at the drop of a hat.
Sep 13, 2013 So here it is Friday the 13th, a week after Pencil Prick Obama threatened to bomb the crap out of Syria on the alleged
basis that Syria's government gassed 1,400 Syrians, including 400 kids.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense: the US bombs Syria because Syria
bombed Syria. Uh huh. A week later and now Americans wake up to
discover that Russian President Vladimir Putin -- ex Chief of the USSR KGB
-- is now our de facto US President,
calling all the US foreign policy and military shots with an Op Ed in the
New York Times, ending the NYT article by criticizing
ex President Barack Obama's reference to
"American Exceptionalism" and "difference" by Putin stating that all nations
are different, rich or poor, at different levels toward democracy, that
nobody is exceptional and that God created all men equal. Whoa, like,
who's been reading the Federalist Papers, the US Constitution, the Bill of
Rights, and the US Declaration of Independence lately? Certainly not
former President Barack Obama. So
Putin is now leading America's foreign policy in the Middle East by setting
up a Let's Dump Syria's Chemical Weapons council with US Sec of State John
Kerry and Syrian reps and not be so hasty to bomb the dukie out of Syria.
Especially since there exists a lot of proof that it was Da Rebels -- Al
Qaeda, Al Nusra, the Muslim Brotherhood, and all the other usual suspects
from Saudi Arabian jails -- who gassed the Syrians, not Assad's government
forces. The point is: Who's in charge here? Most Americans
and others are glad that even an ex KGB agent from Russia has the foresight
and cajones to prevent more bombing in the Middle East and try to settle the
problem through peaceful negotiations. Anybody claiming that we
shouldn't trust an ex KGB Chief from Russia is right but we must not fall
into the judicial trap that a prostitute cannot be a credible witness to a
murder. Of course she can. Just like Vladimir Putin could be --
that's a big COULD be -- a credible negotiator for at least a temporary
peace in the Middle East. The best of all cases is that neither the US
or Russia should be playing war games in the Middle East. But
everybody wants cheap Mid East oil and the central bankers want a Petro
Dollar monopoly and so... capitalism breaks down and altruistic state
collectivism takes over... blaming free market capitalism for what US
fascism and Russian communism (now a straight out dictatorship) are foisting
on everybody all over the globe. One thing in this equation seems
true: Obama is eager to go to war in Syria in order to -- as Wayne
Allen Root reports on our Home Page today -- cover up his massive domestic
economic failures. If nobody's employed, draft them into the military
and ship them off to the Middle East in yet another war manufactured by the
Sep 10, 2013 What a long week of lies, lies and more lies! On Aug 21,
somebody gassed 1,400 Syrians in Damascus, killing some 400 women and
children, more or less. Sec of State John Kerry and President Obama
blamed the Syrian Assad regime for gassing their own people. Other
sources claim that US intelligence secretly conspired with Turkey and Al
Qaeda rebels and planned the whole thing out: meeting with each other,
arming Al Qaeda with US weapons and chemical weapons from Saudi Arabia, and
telling the rebels that they can take action after a "significant event"
occurs -- presumably the gas attack which would be blamed on the Assad
government -- and then a pre-planned bombing strike by the Americans.
What the hell is going on here? It appears that this entire chemical
gassing warfare in Syria was meticulously pre-planned by US intelligence and
the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the Assad government. And all of
this ties in with what Sec of State John Kerry and President Obama claim was
a chemical attack by Syria's Bashar Assad and the call by Kerry and Obama to
immediately launch air strikes against Syria. Sounds like everybody
was reading from the same script. The only thing that stopped the
immediate strike by the US was Obama who thought it would be in his best
political interests to first confer with the US Congress before bombing
Syria. That action may well have backfired on his little
conspiratorial butt since Senators such as Rand Paul raked Sec of State
Kerry over the coals and cited the US Constitution and Federalist Papers
which state in no uncertain terms that it is Congress who has the sole
authority to authorize war, not the Executive Department. And the US
House appears to be ready to vote NO on any strike by the US. In
short, once again, just like in the Benghazi fiasco, President Obama appears
to be involved in clandestine activities supporting the Muslim Brotherhood
and attempting to use the US military to overthrow another regime in the
Middle East. Whose side are we on? Why are we even choosing up
sides? What US national interests are threatened by whoever runs
whichever of the ridiculous dictatorships in the Middle East? Who's
pulling Obama's muppet strings: the central bankers protecting their
Petro Dollar Deal and the OPEC Oil Monopoly, or rogue CIA agents, or is
Obama pulling his own religious muppet strings and aligning himself with the
Muslim Brotherhood against America? Reports from journalists in the
Middle East suggest that Obama is up to his neck in conspiring with the Al
Qaeda rebels to gas their own people in Syria, blame it on Assad, and then
send in the US air force. The Russians and others say they have proof
of the above conspiracy, or at least that Bashar Assad did not do the
gassing. Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed that Syria turn
over any chemical weapons it may have to the UN and destroy the chemicals,
while Obama is slated to lie to Americans on national TV tonight about the
entire affair. Putin has called Sec of State John Kerry and Obama
"liars" because, says Putin, they both know that Assad did not launch
chemical weapons against his own people and that the US CIA and Muslim
Brotherhood (Al Qaeda) had set this entire conspiracy up from the beginning.
Imagine that: the Obama administration, lying to us... again... and
again... and... . Things have really gotten out of control when Americans,
90% of whom support NO BOMBING of Syria, believe ex-KGB chief Vladmir Putin
over our own American President Barack Obama because Obama has lied to us
about everything so often over the last 5-6 years (taxes, Obamacare, and the
Middle East wars) that we don't believe a word he says about anything.
Never mind about a regime change in Syria; how about a regime change in the
Sep 05, 2013 Get this! Syrian rebels in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta
have admitted to Associated Press correspondent Dale Gavlak that they were
responsible for last week's chemical weapons incident which western powers
have blamed on Bashar Al-Assad's forces, revealing that the casualties were
the result of an accident caused by
rebels mishandling chemical weapons provided to them by Saudi Arabia.
If this is true, that means that US Sec of State John Kerry and President
Barack Obama are lying on purpose in
order to drag the US into another extended war in the Middle East. It
means that either we have really really bad intelligence or Kerry and Obama
have made it all up regarding WHO launched the chemical bombs, but
not necessarily the results of how many died and by what type of chemicals.
The Obama administration has lied to the American people on so many domestic
and foreign issues -- witness the Benghazi lie in which our Libyan
ambassador was killed with three others and they blamed it on an anti-Muhammed
"video" produced in Hollywood -- that the big question is why should we
believe Sec of State Kerry and President Obama about Syria? Is the US
about to jump into a war based upon lies by the Obama administration?
And look how rapidly our US Congressmen and women are to believe anything
and ready to launch missiles into Syria.
Sep 04, 2013 Whoa, girl friends, here's an interesting scenario regarding
the US attacking Syria on the alleged allegation that the Syrian govt of
Assad launched chemical bombs on its own population. What if Obama and
his inner circle have conspired with the Muslim Brotherhood -- Al Nusra and
Al Qaeda -- to launch chemical warfare against their own people and then
blame the Assad regime in order to trick the American people (and the world)
into invading Syria to replace Assad with the Muslim Brotherhood?
Think about Bengahzi. Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton were
trying to buy back 200 SAMs from Al Qaeda because they made a mistake and
sold them to the wrong bad guys. Then, in order to cover it all up,
Obama and Clinton lied about the Benghazi attack and murders of our
ambassador and aides, blaming it all on some phony anti-Mohammed movie
produced by some Loony Toon in Hollywood. Obama and Clinton have a
long history of lying about everything, so why should we believe that it was
Assad who launched the chemical bombs in Syria? We don't even know if
Obama is a citizen eligible to be President of the United States. And
he has lied up the yin yang about how Obamacare, taxes and medical care.
So what if Obama is really a Manchurian Candidate for the Muslim
Brotherhood? He could be a Trojan Horse. Just review his entire
background with Rev Wright and his other socialist teachers throughout his
entire life. It looks like the Pied Piper of America may be playing
Americans like a Stradivarius violin. I'm not saying this scenario is
true. This is only a speculation. Some may claim it's just a
"conspiracy theory" -- redefining this term as something that is not true
while ignoring the fact that there have been many conspiracies all
throughout history and they were true conspiracies. This scenario
may indeed be a conspiracy fact. Time will tell. Meanwhile, get
ready for the possible start of WW III. By the way, dontcha just love
the way President Obama goes onto national TV and babbles about dire
consequences if Syria crosses the "red line" of launching chemical weapons
and then claims at the G20 conference in Sweden that he did not draw a "red
line," the rest of the world drew a "red line." Right. He
doesn't even have the cajones to stand up and take responsibility for his
own speech and actions... blaming everybody else except himself in case he
Sep 03, 2013 To bomb Syria, or not to bomb Syria, that is the question.
Which branch of the US government has the authority to declare "war?"
The Executive branch or the Legislative branch? Sec of State John
Kerry says, "The Executive branch." Senator Rand Paul says, "The
Federalist Papers and the US Constitution clearly state that the power to
declare war is vested in the Legislative branch... and it doesn't matter
whether it's just a little bomb, a big bomb, or boots on the ground."
Nobody in the Let's Go To War Camp has stated the exact military objective
of bombing Syria. Nobody in the Let's Go To War Camp can say with any
confidence that bombing Syria will cut the future chance of more war or
increase the future chance of more war. So what are the answers to the
above? Well, how did we get to the point we are today in the Middle
East? Easy peazy lemon squeazy: We allowed the central bankers
to take America off the gold standard, force us onto a fiat paper currency
standard, create the Petro Dollar Deal with countries in the Middle East,
and use the US military to enforce their cabal. Money and oil, that is
why we are in the Middle East. The US has all the domestic oil it
needs, all kinds of free energy from the vacuum sources that it could
develop, and a free market opportunity in which we should be using a hard
commodity standard for our value of economic exchange. But as long as
the average American has no clue what real money is, knows nothing about the
central bankers and their Petro Dollar Deal, and continues to fall for
choosing up fake sides in our manufactured wars all over the globe, then
America will participate in all kinds of meaningless wars overseas.
Now, why specifically are we possibly going to go to war in Syria soon?
Because our stupid ignoramus of a president -- Barack Obama, the Pied Piper
of our left Liberal youth -- grabbed his balls like a rap singer on stage,
stuck out his thumb and pinkie finger and said to the world, "Oh yeah,
Syria, cross this 'red line' using chemical weapons and see what happens."
So Syria gassed its people months ago. And Obama did nothing. So
Syria gassed its people again. And Obama did nothing. So Syria
gassed its people last week and Obama said, "Well, oh yeah? Let's go
ask Congress what to do so they will get the blame instead of me." And
that's exactly where we are today: the Foreign Relations Committee of
the US Congress is arguing back and forth whether America should drop a
bomb, launch missiles, use squirt guns, or do nothing or, as former Gov
Sarah Palin said, "just let Allah sort it out." As long as the cental
bankers keep on keeping on with their Petro Dollar Deal, there is no
solution: either foreign or domestic. The root cause is a
non-understanding by most people of the Law of Identity and the Laws of
Cause and Effect, esp. with regard to what constitutes monetary "value."
And, more importantly, who has the right to determine their own money:
the bankers or the individual? If the US attacks Syria, look for the
start of WW III. By the way, the Sec of State, John Kerry, is wrong in
stating that no other country except Syria and Iraq have used chemical
warfare to gas their people. What does Kerry think Germany's Third
Reich was doing when it shipped millions of Jews and others into the gas
chambers in WW II? Does it matter whether the govt drops a gas bomb on
you downtown or trucks you into a gas chamber? And does it matter
whether the govt shoots you (120,000 Syrians) or gases you (1,500 Syrians)?
So, the Sec of State should at least get his facts straight before babbling
in his typical Double Speak before Congress on national TV. Well,
Obama, here's another nice mess you've gotten us into.
Aug 29, 2013 So here's the Big Question, and I'm directing this to those who
are following around (like little puppy dogs) our off-planet friends (the Plejaren) living on Erra in another dimension that is a fraction of a second
off from our own vibrational time frame. Those who don't know what I'm
referring to can log onto www.figu.org and
catch up to the fact that we are not alone in the Milky Way Galaxy, much
less the entire universe. Look it up; I don't have the time and space
-- no pun intended -- to educate you here or now about this subject. Anyway, the Big
Question is: who is worse, a president such as George Bush who knowingly
lies to us and pulls off a lot of stunts for his military industrial complex
and banking buddies to further enrich themselves OR a naive president WITH
SUPPOSEDLY "GOOD INTENTIONS" who stupidly leads us down an economic path of
total altruistic state collectivism -- let's just call it socialism -- that
must inexorably end up in economic destruction and World War III?
Neither is good but the point is: "good intentions" by ignoramus
presidents is not better than "bad intentions" by bad presidents.
They're the same: bad. The
real problem that I have noticed from the Plejaren and Billy Meier and their
lock-step followers is that NONE of them in this intellectual camp
understand the basics of simple economics and thus think that just because
somebody has "good intentions," they are OK guys and will become a suitable
president. Nothing could be further from the truth. An
leader who is an idiot is exactly that: an idiot. And he will lead you over the
cliff just as surely as a smart bad buy will. This brings up a very interesting
phenomenon: ET humans -- of which there are some estimated 7.5 million
different races in the Milky Way alone, according to the Plejaren -- have
not evolved equally in every area of intellectual endeavor such as physics,
chem, bio, and especially economics so that they have these areas fully and
equally integrated into their intelligence. By "equal" I do not mean
individuals, I mean "equal" areas of intellectual endeavor. Thus, one
ends up with ET humans who can jump to hyper light speed, transverse what we
call "time" whether it's a "dimension" or not, but don't understand how
basic economics works. Thus they do not comprehend the difference --
and its ultimate economic effects -- caused by, for example, using fiat currency vs. hard
commodity money. They do not understand how prices -- which are simply
qualitative subjective value judgments by individuals -- can only be formed in a free
market and once that market is destroyed, say by central bankers
counterfeiting the money supply, the economy must necessarily go into
self-destruct mode. Why don't the ET Plejaren understand this?
After all, they are some 18,000 years ahead of us in physics, medicine,
etc.? Look at it this way. Like us, they are living in a culture
that took a long time to build up and the current Plejaren did not invent
their past discoveries any more than our current Earth humans invented the
internal combustion engine, light bulbs or computers. Yes, the people
on Earth today know how to drive a car, use a cell phone, and take
antibiotics but they did not invent them. Similarly, most Plejaren
today, like most Earth humans, have no clue about how economics really
works. THEREFORE, -- and this is a big THEREFORE -- the Plejaren make
the mistake that all you have to do is WANT to make the economy "prosperous"
and it will happen. That's why in the 1930's and 40's the Plejaren
mistakenly gave (via telepathic vibrations) the plans to build beam ships to scientists in
Germany's Third Reich and then had to cancel those plans and beam ships when they
discovered that the Nazis weren't the "good guys" they thought they were.
Amazingly, the Plejaren were not aware that national socialism must
inexorably lead to the Holocaust and the economic destruction that it did.
Thus, today, the Plejaren continue to make the same mistake and for the same
basic reason. They think that US president Barack Obama's "good
intentions" are all that it takes to lead America and the world out of its
current Recession/Depression. If they understood anything about basic
Austrian free market economics, they would not come to that conclusion.
Similarly, if I could transport 10,000 Egyptian children from 5,000 years
ago and raise them in today's US economy, they would all learn how to use
iPhones, drive a car, and turn on the TV. But that does not mean they
understand how these inventions work and they would not necessarily be the
ones who invent anything new. Same for the Plejaren. They are
living off previously invented technology and very few of them, if any,
especially hard physical scientists, understand anything about praxeology
(human action) which is the subject of free market economics.
Conclusion: thanks to the Plejaren for all the physics and time travel info and saving
the planet Earth from other ET "invaders" in the past -- which
they claim and I believe them -- but I caution you all
from Erra to please bone up on the basic laws of econ. Those who just
live and breathe every word from the contact notes of the Plejaren should learn to question
intellectual issues using your own brain and stop just re-hashing what you
heard or think you heard from our ET friends. Do I question the Plejaren's existence? No. Do I question how fast they can travel
through the universe? No. Do I question how they farm their
agriculture or build
beam ships? No. Do I question their knowledge in every area of
endeavor? Yes. Especially basic economics. And that's the
name of that tune. They claim that they support Obama and that he is
one of the best presidents the US has ever had -- or at least that's what
Earth humans have translated from the Plejaren. Obama may have "good intentions." But,
as we have stated above, that is not the issue. The road to hell is
paved with good intentions. We are concerned with rational results
from rational intentions. Obama is obviously an
ignoramus -- especially in economics -- whose strings are being pulled by
other ignoramuses. The road to Hell is paved
with "good intentions," and that's exactly where Obama and his
"handlers" are leading us: straight to economic Hell and thus to WW III.
Good thing the Plejaren are forbidden by the Galaxy's High Council to not
overly "influence" the direction that Earth humans are going; otherwise,
they might think it would be great to implement a world state collectivist
government on planet Earth. Then again, we could do with more
intellectual "influences" from the Plejaren regarding free market capitalism
as a basis for more rational social-political-economics. Unless of
course, we are supposed to go through Hell in order to get to "Heaven" --
rational thought, not a location in Earth major religions -- and Obama is
just playing his part? The Plejaren may be 18,000 years ahead of us in
technology but they appear to be about 200 years behind us -- at least
Libertarians -- in economics.
Aug 29, 2013 As Rep Ron Paul said, "Let me get this straight: we're
going to attack Syria because Syria attacked Syria?"
Aug 27, 2013 Time for the start of WW III? Syria's president, Bozo Assad, launched chemical weapons against his own people last week, killing
hundreds of innocent men, women, and children. So what else is new in
the Middle East? Like nobody ever did this in WW II or Vietnam, right?
Syrian rebels fighting to overthrow Assad, are comprised of Hezbollah, the
Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and other "Spring
Revolutionaries" that President Obama says will bring peace and prosperity
to the Middle East. Yeah, right. Unfortunately for President
Obama, he has to appear like he knows how to run the US military and so he
is moving at least 4 aircraft carriers and other US war ships into the
Mediterranean, pretending to do what, shoot up Assad, launch a couple of
missiles, or who knows what? US politicians have dragged the US into a
no-win position in the Middle East. The entire region is playing out a
religious civil war and US politicians and central bankers have forced us
into military conflicts all over that area, choosing up sides, financing
idiot dictators, then deposing them when they don't work out and choosing up
new idiot dictators and sending them tons of hyper-inflated US dollars and
military equipment. That's how World Wars start. Sticking your
nose into other nations' business just like Woodrow Wilson did in WW I and
FDR did in WW II (at the behest of the central bankers so they could issue
more war bonds). It is now a known fact that FDR purposely pushed the
Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor by cutting off their access to fuel
from Indonesia and elsewhere. Now it's President Obama's turn.
What will he do? Launch a couple of missiles and kill more women and
children in Syria? Commit the US to sending ground troops? Why
don't we just launch a few nukes over the entire Middle East, wipe 'em all
out, and then tell any survivors they have to become Baptists, Mormons,
Muslims, or Buddhists? Like it's any of our business. US
foreign policy is so stupid it is incredible. And guess what?
You get to pay for it.
Aug 11, 2013 Entrepreneur Donald Trump said it best:
"Let me get this straight:
We're going to be "gifted"
with a health care plan we areforced to
purchaseand finedif we don't,
which purportedly covers at least ten million more people,
without addinga single new doctor,
but provides for16,000 new IRS agents,
written by a committee whose chairmansays hedoesn't understand it,
passedby a Congressthat didn't readit but exemptedthemselves from
it, and signed by a President whosmokes,
a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes,
for which we'll betaxed for four
years before any benefits take effect,
by a government which hasalready
bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,
all to be overseen by a surgeon generalwho isobese,
and financedby a country
Jul 28, 2013 "Phony scandals?" Really? President Obama says all
of the recent scandals involving him, Sec of State Hillary Clinton, the NSA
gathering all of our communications, and the IRS hassling targeted political
opponents of the President are "phony." Our ambassador to Libya and
three others were murdered because the current administration was running
guns to our enemies, the IRS targeted Tea Partiers and GOP groups denying
them equal tax exempt status as they granted to Democrats, the IRS grabbed all
the AP reporter files illegally obtained in a raid of AP Headquarters, the NSA has way way overshot its mandate to
protect us from foreign enemies and is now conducting surveillances against
American citizens without due process. ObamaCare -- the non-affordable
health care debacle -- is a train wreck in the process of crashing off the
rails NOW, not next year, but right NOW. Even the IRS workers and the
unions who voted for Obama don't want Obamacare. And when Americans want to
redress their grievances against President Obama and his warmed-over version
of socialism that has never succeeded at any time in the last 100 years,
Obama has the nerve to stand up on national TV and claim that everybody
complaining about his constant stomping on our individual rights is just
making up scandals that didn't really happen. I'm wondering who Obama
thinks he is? Is he really stupid enough to believe that one man --
mainly him -- can and should "manage" every aspect of every exchange in the
free market? He knows how much we should save, how much we should
earn, who we can exchange with, what we should eat, the list goes on and on?
By what right, by what authority does he strip us of our liberties and
suggest that he knows what's best for us? When Obama says that someone
rich like Bill Gates earns too much money, and thus wants to limit Gates'
income, it is not Gates that he is attacking. It's the consumer who
volunteered to pay for whatever computer systems that Bill Gates is selling.
By what authority does President Obama claim that it's his right to prohibit
American individuals to choose what products they want to purchase? It
is not the rich that Obama is after; it's you and me. Bill Gates can't
make us buy his products. So it's you and me that Obama wants to
control, not Bill Gates, not the rich. Of course, Obama and the First
Lady don't think the rules apply to them because they're spending your tax
money and the Federal Reserve's Funny Money like there is no tomorrow.
In short, President Obama and his administration are nothing but highway
robbers, stealing from you and me while pretending to be "public servants,"
saving us from the rich capitalists and rendering some sort of public service
for us. All he needs is the sanction of his victims, and he receives
that by tricking most Americans into choosing up fake political sides in his
giant political football game and claiming that his opponents are just
making up "phony scandals." Meanwhile, one Ambassador and three
assistants are dead, Conservatives and Libertarians are targeted by the IRS,
the NSA is reading your mail, and Obama is busy playing golf and hosting
rock n roll groups at the White House. The President is way way out of
touch with reality and with the American people. Can anybody spell
Jul 25, 2013
TV commentator Bill O'Reilly jumped up and down in his "Talking Points" the
other day and claimed that the MAIN CAUSE of race problems in America are
due to "lack of family" in the black community. He then went on to
bloviate and pontificate via all related disconnected thought globs on
this theme. And, of course, since he did not define his premises, he
popped up with wrong conclusions. So let's start at the beginning.
Lack of family is not the cause of race problems in America; it is a
symptom. The root cause is America's moral philosophy of altruistic state
collectivism and thus the implementation of the welfare state that
subsidizes bad behavior on the part of young black women in the ghettos
they are "paid" by the government to live in. The problem is not drugs, as
it was not alcohol during Prohibition in the early 1900s. The commodity in
question is never the problem; it is how we treat that commodity and remove
it from the free market that is the problem. As long as we treat drugs
like alcohol during Prohibition, we will get the same results for young
black males as we had with Al Capone and the gangsters of that era.
Should individuals be responsible for their own behavior? Of course
they should. And we don't need the government -- which means Americans
in general through direct taxation or allowing the Federal Reserve to do it
with Funny Money -- subsidizing people's bad behavior and then complaining
when they act bad. The solution is LESS govt intervention. The Welfare
State, which is socialism on the installment plan, is the problem. The rest
are symptoms. The root cause, as stated above, is our American
pseudo-intellectuals' gift to their nation: altruistic state collectivism.
Jul 22, 2013 Have you seen the recent video entitled: The Trayvon
Martin Case: The Lynching of Journalism? It explains a lot about the
Martin/Zimmerman case that we have not heard from the majority left Liberal
news media. But there is something far worse.
The most disgusting aspect
of this Trayvon Martin/Zimmerman issue is that President Obama has now
clearly revealed on national TV that he does not believe in the rule of law
but rather in what Ayn Rand would call: the rule of tribal collectivism. In
Obama's case, this means the color of one's skin. Which means racism. Barack
Obama wants to replace and overturn the already determined jury verdict by
an objective court system with an appeal to state collectivist race riots in
the streets. That is, he wants to replace objective law with subjective
Majority Rule: i.e. a lynch mob based solely on the color of one's skin and
upon real or imagined historical -- but unrelated -- racial transgressions.
In US jurisprudence, the sons are not responsible for the transgressions of
the fathers. Individuals are only responsible for their own actions, not the
actions of their forefathers or, worse, the actions of somebody with the
same skin color.
In effect, what President
Obama has made perfectly clear to everybody in the world is that he is a
blatant racist who believes not in the Rule of Objective Law, not in the
concepts of right and wrong, not in inherent individual rights, but rather
he believes -- and is pushing legislation and EOs upon these beliefs -- in
Majority Rule of the Mob, of The Tribe as defined by skin color or the shape
of one's nose or whichever Thugs happen to have the most guns and are
currently in power. Obama's credo is Might Makes Right, and that is why he
is showing up on national TV to appeal to the state collectivist racists in
TV Land, whether black or white Liberals on their own little Guilt Trip, to
replace the Rule of Law with race riots in the street as the new valid form
of law in America. Obama is, in effect, attempting to overturn the concepts
of objective social-political-economics embedded in the US Constitution,
Federalist Papers, and Bill of Rights which are based upon inalienable rights of the
INDIVIDUAL with Obama's warmed-over Marxist principles of state collectivism and Mob
Rule. Your allegiance, according to Obama, must be to the color of your
skin, not inherent individual rights and freedoms. This same mentality is
responsible for ObamaCare and all the other legislation and Executive Orders
that Obama and his socialist Goons in the Government are trying to shove
down everybody's throats in America.
Obama has committed a far
worse crime than Trayvon Martin. He has lent the power and prestige of the
Executive Branch of government to a concept so evil that the last time we
saw such an outrage it expressed itself as The Holocaust in in Germany in WW II. What Trayvon Martin did was peanuts compared to what President Obama just did.
And Obama is a product of Harvard Law School? So much for intellectualism in
America's academia today.
The real issue at stake here
is: individual rights vs. state collectivism. George Zimmerman represents
individual rights. Trayvon Martin represents a deranged druggie tripping out
on the drug concoction called "Lean." But the worst part is President Barack Obama, who represents
racist state collectivism in the highest political office in our country.
Jul 07, 2013 This week the Wall Street Journal apologized to its readers for
not being hard enough with their criticisms of ObamaCare. They now
acknowledge what Libertarians knew all along: ObamaCare is a huge
economic and statist train wreck that is running off the tracks and over the
financial cliff. I could say the same thing about the WSJ's lack of
criticism in general about all forms of governmental intervention into the
free market. Just to show how inconsistent and unprincipled the
editors at the Journal are, they state in the same issue how wonderful it
would be if the US continues to send $1.3 Billion in tax money as weapons
and aid to the new government of Egypt after the Egyptian military just won
a coup d'etat against the democratically- elected Morsi government.
The Morsi Islamos were voted in after last year's overthrow of Egypt's
previous Hasni, Horni or whoever government. So what we got now
in Egypt is the people -- supposedly through the military -- have dumped an
Islamic church/state government and the Muslim brotherhood is rather ticked
off about it. And we're supposed to continue sending weapons to the
Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Muslim Brotherhood so they can blow our US military
personnel's brains out in all the adjacent wars going on all over the Middle
East. Ain't that smart! The US has a great military but they are
being used all wrong, namely for various idiotic interventionist purposes to
support the OPEC oil monopoly which is fueled -- no pun intended -- by our
central bank's Petrol Dollar Deal. What complex webs of deceit the
state protectionists weave in order to grab off power and exploit what's
left of the free market. And that's what the editors of the WSJ
continue to NOT understand. For the same free market reasons that the
WSJ should rail against ObamaCare, they should rail against US intervening
in all areas of the market, including the Middle East and all the
"manufactured" wars going on over there. Changing the commodity
intervened upon doth not the basic laws of economics changeth. The
best thing the US Congress could do -- or the President for that matter --
is to send the Egyptians a copy of the US Constitution. Send one to
the editors at the WSJ too. Hell, these days, we don't even do that
for American school children. Perhaps this latter explains the former.
-- Sun Jun 30,
Is the climate on Earth changing? You bet. Is it due to
overpopulation? Much of it is. BUT... should that make it a GOP
vs. left Liberal political issue? Absolutely not. Does the existence
of climate change
mean that President Barack Obama should take over the entire economy, issue
Executive Orders to intervene into what's left of the free market, our
individual freedoms, and private property rights on a pretext of saving us
all? Nope. So what
should we do? How about allowing individuals to voluntarily exchange
ideas, services, and commodities with each other in a free and unfettered
market in order to solve all the various climate change and
overpopulation issues? For example, how about educating people to the
fact that we could control our overpopulation with voluntary methods such as
couples only having one child every 7 years with a maximum of two children
Some would, some wouldn't. That's their choice. Peer pressure
might convince them. Government mandates, that's another tricky issue.
Having 2 children maximum with a 7 year interval would greatly slow down our population explosion. And thus cut
down on over-fishing of our oceans, polluting of our land and
waterways, cut down on air pollution, etc. The last thing we need is
to implement a centrally-managed government control of everybody's lives and
the free market. The EPA is a joke. It exists for Company A to
"legally" beat up on Company B or for one group to control others in a
political power play. Selling "Carbon Credits" is the most ridiculous
economic idea since Karl Marx's socialist bull$hit. It was not freedom
and free market capitalism that caused our overpopulation and
climate changes, although Liberals re-writing their revisionist history want
to convince you that it was. It was, and still is, governmental intervention and mis-management
of our planet by interventionist politicians -- especially in socialist nations
-- that have brought us to
the brink of our current climate changes, overpopulation, and financial
catastrophes. The major religions and socialist nations -- except
China -- are gung-ho to increase their populations for more cannon fodder to
take over the world. In freedom, we have historically overcome all sorts of
pollution and implemented proper management of the planet. Under
governmental intervention -- which is created by politicians to allow their
friends and buddies to gain advantages over their competition in the market
-- we have totally ruined many areas on Earth. Unfortunately, the
current ideology being put forth by the majority political parties blame
freedom, private property rights, and free market capitalism for all of the
ills on our planet, and therefore, we are simply getting more of the same
every year with more and more interventionist legislation.
More governments are taking over EVERY aspect of the market, EVERY aspect of
our private lives, and even in once free USA, the President and majority
Democrats are simply issuing illegal Executive Orders allowing our illegal
President to strip us of our freedoms and force us into involuntary
servitude in order to save ourselves from ourselves. From health care to education, from communications to food
from housing to the determination of our medium of economic exchange and
interest rates, the
central government is hell bent on telling us what to do, when to do it, and
arresting those who spill the beans about the fact that the Feds are spying
on EVERY aspect of our lives. Climate change is real.
Overpopulation is real. But the solution is not more government.
The solution is to use our brains, use our logic, think rationally, and the
only way to do that is to allow us to live in a voluntary free market.
Those who THINK they are gaining security by sacrificing their liberties are
fools. But by the time they figure out what freedoms they have lost, it will be too late.
Wake up, folks. Your freedoms are rapidly slipping through your
fingers. 20,000 pages of ObamaCare, larger than the IRS pages, 17,000
additional IRS agents to "MONITOR" ObamaCare, $20,000 average cost per
family for 2014 health care costs. If this continues, the US will be
absolutely bankrupt and you will be living in total tyranny. The economy
is now running over the cliff and you will soon be living in
Atlas Shrugged. We are half way there already. All because you
voluntarily gave up your rights and freedoms to the government. It's
called: obtaining the sanction of the victim. That would be you,
if you let it happen. Your choice.
Jun 27, 2013 Are you sitting around wondering why the futures prices of
precious metals and stocks -- gold and silver -- are collapsing around your
feet faster than a hooker's g-string in a hotel room at a Las Vegas
convention? I'm not. But just in case, here's the real skinny.
The major central banks of the world whose stocks are owned 100% by the
major gansta bankstas such as Goldman Sucks, JP Morgan, et al. have gone
naked shorts on us. What does that mean? It means the banks are
shorting MORE paper gold and silver than the amount of physical gold and
silver in existence in an entire year's production of said precious metals.
Which, if a real shorts recording institution existed in the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) -- to balance and reconcile the true
physical amount of precious metals being shorted against the amount of paper
being shorted -- then this huge naked shorts position could never occur.
But the CFTC and the SEC and the central bankers and the central bank owners
of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank are setting themselves
up for a humongous PAY DAY as they are going longggg on precious metals
pretty soon to rake in the huge jump in precious metals prices that are
about to happen. How do we know? Because the central banks --
the Fed Reserve and ECB -- are still printing up hundreds of billions of
dollars and Euros in inflated paper and plastic. No banks are holding
back. This is another brilliant bank robbery of the citizens of the
world as the bankers set the suckers up twice: naked shorts first, and
then gobbling up all precious metals and precious metals stocks at fire sale
prices whenever they determine they've made enough on their naked shorts.
So what should you do? Buy precious metals and stocks when there's
blood running in the streets. Is there blood running in the streets
yet? I don't know but let's all sing with the central bankers, "Yo-ho,
yo-ho, a pirate's life for me."
Jun 26, 2013 Whoa, girl friends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, listen up,
and pour yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. There are more people on
Food Stamps in the US, 47 million, than the entire population of Spain, 46
million. That's billions and billions of Federal Reserve Notes -- our
fake money, whether paper or plastic -- that adds to the inflation already
created by our central bankers as they "stimulate" -- ha, ha, "stimulate" --
our economy with their $17 trillion deficit and $100 trillion unfunded long
term debt (Medicare and Soc Security). What's next, Housing Stamps?
How about Aspirin Stamps? After all, Americans should have a big
headache by now, right? What about Shoe Stamps, French Fry Stamps,
Phone Stamps, iPad Stamps, Automobile Stamps, Bicycle Stamps, Eye Glasses
Stamps, and Handkerchief Stamps? We got to blow our noses, don't we?
Uh-huh. What the Hay, let's just let the government take everybody's
money and issue all types of Stamps for every commodity and service in the
economy. Why bother with traditional money? President Obama
knows how much of everything every good citizen in America needs and he can
just issue Obama Decrees and declare whatever Stamps we all need. Hey,
I need a left Tennis Shoe Stamp... OK, coming right up. Of course,
President Obama and His Royal Wifester, Michelle, need $100 million in
Secret Service Stamps to protect them on their
Vacation-Business-Save-The-World- Trips-Around-The-Globe every year but so
what? Just print up more Secret Service (SS) Stamps and varroooom, off
they go on Air Force One to visit his birth place in Kenya and The Pope at
the Vatican where they can talk to God and Allah, whomever, smoke dope, and
drink wine. Ya-yesss, that's what it's all about: power.
Some people work and produce; some people swipe it all under the guise of
"public service." Yeah, "public service." Thank you for "public
servicing" us to death, President Obama. All with "good intentions"
you understand. Oh, ah-hem, cough, cough, yes, "good intentions," you
Jun 25, 2013 Dontcha just love it when people who understand zip, zero,
nadda about social-political-economic philosophy pop up with -- in reference
to whether whistleblower Edward Snowden should or should not have revealed
the fact that the NSA is collecting every piece of communication it can
about everybody in the US -- they don't care if the government spies on
everybody because they have nothing to hide? Or, the same people plus
President Obama says something to the effect, "Oh no, we are not READING
all your emails and phone messages, we have simply COLLECTED them and
are storing them in Utah. Ya-yesss, girl friends, we are only --
CURRENTLY -- looking at the sender and recipient addresses to find out
if they have terrorist CONNECTIONS." Uh-huh. Terrorist
connections. And neither group -- the President or the zip, zero,
nadda people -- bring up the real issue: what if it is the government
itself that we have to be fearful of IN THE FUTURE? And, in fact,
isn't that exactly why our Founding Fathers included protections in the US
Constitution prohibiting the GOVERNMENT from spying carte blanche on
all of its citizens? Of course it is. And yet, you can hear US
Congressmen such as Lindsay Graham Crackers, John McCain, Diane Feinstein,
and many others babbling that, "Oh, it's OK for the NSA to sweep and collect
the data from our 9 major computer communications companies in order to save
us from all the 'terrorists' out there who are just waiting to do us in."
These type of non-thinkers 'feel' that total security is more important than
individual liberty and they are willing to sacrifice YOUR rights and their's
to enforce it. Think back in history, as in Germany and Italy in the
1930's. Think about the USSR throughout the entire cold war.
Think about Mao's Peoples Republic of China. Everybody was safe and
secure all right -- except from their own government, which, by the way in
every case, slaughtered tens of millions of their own citizens to save them
from the pig pirate capitalists of America. Or some other Boogie Man. Right. What an
excuse for mass genocide, the Jewish Holocaust, Mao's purges of millions of
people, and World War III. It is not under freedom, private property
rights, and the true implementation of the philosophy embedded in the US
Constitution that is the problem; it is the slow, creeping, invasion against
our private property rights that is the problem. Currently, the NSA is
the problem, not Edward Snowden. We can monitor and implement our
defenses against international and internal enemies -- true terrorists and
those who are trying to harm us -- through proper implementation of the
philosophy embedded in the US Constitution. We do not have to give up
our freedoms and private property rights to do so. We do not have to
turn into a police state. We just have to use our technology properly.
As long as whistleblower Edward Snowden stands on the moral principles of
our Founding Fathers, he will be vindicated. If he strays into
non-philosophical areas such as specific intelligence information that he
"likes" or "dislikes," then he is straying from his basic principles and
should shut up. "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security
Jun 17, 2013 NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden is now, unfortunately, straying
from his original Constitutional reason for blowing the whistle on the Obama
Administration and the NSA. Namely, Snowden is now revealing that the
US and Britain and other countries are spying on each other at world
economic meetings. I say: so what? That's their job.
The real problem was -- and Edward Snowden needs to stick with it -- that the
US was gathering carte blanche information from every citizen in the US,
including their emails, Twitters, Googles, texting, and phone messages.
That is unconstitutional and it is this higher moral philosophical ground that Snowden must stand upon
in order to be effective. Otherwise, he is descending into simply
expressing his opinion on which type of intelligence he thinks it's OK for
the US to gather vs. the sweeping methodology he originally opposed.
Let's hope somebody gets him back on track soon or he will be falling right
into the hands of the Bozos in the Obama Administration, the NSA (which
means Susan Rice, which means Barack Obama) and the the War Hawks from Sen.
John McCain to Sen. Lindsey "The Wimp" Graham Crackers. Wise up, Eddie,
or you just may well get knocked off by that drone that you will never see.
Jun 12, 2013 Where is NSA Whistleblower Snowden hiding out? Honk Kong?
Russia? Las Vegas? Boise, Idaho? Who knows? What did
he do "wrong?" According to the Obama government and many war hawks in
Congress, Snowden's revelation that Da Gumment is collecting and storing
septillions of bytes of meta-data of all of the public's emails, iPhone
communications, Google Searches, and yo Grannie's secret cherry pie recipe
constitutes "treason" -- or at least a violation of his signed oath to not
reveal whatever information he learns through his job at the NSA.
However, Snowden is claiming that he answers to a higher oath of law:
namely, an oath to protect and abide by the US Constitution. Note that
US surveillance laws -- such as creation of the NSA -- is subordinate to,
and was allowed to come into existence by, the first law: the US
Constitution. Further note that the US Constitution came into being by
free peoples who obtained their individual rights to their own minds,
bodies, and property as an inalienable right of Natural Law. The US
Constitution did not bestow rights upon American citizens. Vice versa.
The US Constitution is not a "granting" document; it is a "prohibiting"
document. It describes what the government CANNOT do to its citizens.
And that is exactly what whistleblower Snowden is resting his case upon:
i.e., the NSA does not have legal authority to spy on its citizens or
violate their rights without going through the proper procedures which DO
NOT INCLUDE violations of either their explicit protections in the US
Constitution or their inherent Natural Rights obtained at birth. Will
the Obama Administration violate Snowden's inherent rights by knocking him
off with a drone missile while he sits sipping a hot sake on the rocks in
Hong Kong? Who knows? It appears the Obama -- and previous
administrations -- are always too eager to shut its citizens up with
whatever force and power they think they can get away with. Obama has
so much social-political-economic crap on his plate right now -- virtually
violating every US Constitutional and Natural Law in the book -- that he
probably doesn't know whether to keep pooping on us or order up more laundry
service to try and clean up all his previous diapers. Which mess
should he try to clean up first? What are his priorities?
Benghazi, IRS targeting Tea Parties, IRS grabbing AP journalist personal
papers, IRS auditing Conservatives, EPA releasing personal info of 80,000
ranchers and farmers to Eco Radical groups, Hillary's State Dept hiding
hooker hookups for the Secret Service, and now the NSA working with 7-9
computer companies to swipe and store your personal emails, texts, Googles,
photos, and whatever else isn't nailed down to the kitchen sink? Where
will it all end? How about a Big Time Strike against Bo-Bama who isn't
a US citizen anyway and didn't attend Columbia U. and who the hell knows
about Harvard? Maybe he sent in a Double Agent -- or wifester Michelle
with a clean shaven head -- to take his tests and edit the Harvard Law
Review? Ah, what webs of deceit do governments weave to hide their
dirty deeds. I can't wait for the sequel to Obama's Divine Comedy...
Jun 11, 2013 Here we go again. Big Government vs. the individual.
If it's not the IRS harassing the American people, it's the EPA, the
Environmental Protection Agency. Instead of "saving" everybody from
the supposed viciousness of free market capitalism -- which is a made-up
fairytale in and of itself -- the EPA just released personal information on
80,000 of America's ranchers and farmers to radical Eco Greenies. Why
would the EPA do this? Under the camouflage of obtaining info via an FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request, the Obama Administration is
apparently using environmental groups such as Earth Justice, the Natural
Resources Defense Council, and the Pew Charitable Trust to whip those who
are not pro-Obama, those who are continually forced to fight the excesses of
the bureaucrats at the EPA. As we have said repeatedly in these
columns, the bureaus created by government are not created to "save" us from
anything. The EPA was not created to "save" us from environmental
problems. The EPA was created in order for one group, whether business
or otherwise, to have a "legal" weapon to beat up on other groups, usually
their competitors. The Federal Reserve was not created to "save" us
from bad bankers and recessions and depressions. The Federal Reserve
was created by and for big banks to gain a monopoly on the money supply and
to "control" the economy for their own self-aggrandizement. The FDA
was not created to save us from bad food. The FDA was created for one
business group to "legally" beat up on and gain advantages against its
competitors. The IRS was created by those who created the Federal
Reserve in order to enforce the repayment of the national debt and interest
created by the bankers. Those suckers, usually Liberals, who think
that the IRS, the FDA, the EPA, the FAA, and all the thousands of other
bureaus in the government were created to "save" us from the so-called
vagaries and viciousness of the free market are stupid or... they are in one
of the groups that gain an advantage over their market competitors. So
now, during all the scandals popping up left and right about how the IRS is
being used by the Obama Administration to whip its political opponents, we
discover that the Obama Administration is using the EPA for the same
purpose. Oh, but let's not forget: the EPA acknowledged that it
sent out more info than it should have but has now redacted portions of the
same info and re-sent it to the Eco Radicals. Oooh, like that will
solve the problem. Yeah, girl friends, here's 80,000 names and
addresses of America's ranchers and farmers but don't pay attention to that
info, OK? We take it back. Ha ha. Not only did the EPA put
the lives and livelihoods of America's food producers at risk, they
have now put America's food supply at risk, too. Really brilliant,
EPA. If you didn't know the real reason the EPA and IRS were created
before, you know it now. Plus, we now have learned that the NSA is
gathering all your emails, Google searches, and phone records at a new
facility in Utah that can hold yota-byes of info. That's a septillion
bytes of data, folks. And you thought you were big time with 16
gigabytes on your iPhone.
Jun 07, 2013 Whoa, girlfriends, pull up the barn floor, shut up, and pour
yourselves another hot cup of Rocket Java. Welcome to Verizon
Wireless. And to Sprint. And to Google. And to MicroSoft
hotmail. And to Facebook. Good thing everybody has gone social
networking crazy to make it easy for the Obama Administration to confiscate
all your communications so he can protect you from George Orwell's 1984 dum
da dum: TERRORISTS. Ooh, ooh, dey everywhere, dey everywhere.
In yo closets, in yo dresser drawers, in your kitchen, in yo socks, in yo
bafroom, in yo cookie jar, run run or da TERRORISTS will getchoo. And
if there were no TERRORISTS, the Obama Administration -- just like the
George Bush Administration -- would make them up. I mean, the central
bankers have to have someone to blame for the global hyper inflation that
they created. The wars they're financing. The European Central
bankers have to have someone to point the finger at when housing prices and
the entire economies of France, Germany, Britain, Greece, Italy, Spain,
Portugal, Ireland, and Grandma's Candy Shoppe in Iceland collapse through
bankruptcy. The US Federal Reserve has to have somebody -- and I think
it was the TERRORISTS, yes it was the TERRORISTS -- who inflated the US fake
dollar and ran up a $17 trillion dollar deficit, and a $100 trillion dollar
unfunded social security and national health care debt. So, of course,
now the Obama Administration has to "PROTECT" you from the TERRORISTS who
are hiding behind every corner of every building, hiding in the airport, in
public buildings, on airplanes, trains, cars, bicycles, dey everywhere dey
everywhere, and save you from your little emailing self. Uh oh.
Be careful what you say on your Facebook page. Be careful what you
send in your emails. No no no, don't bash the current Obama
Administration or they will sic the IRS on yo ass, and then the EPA, and
then OSHA, and then and then errrrrrrt.... screech... along came the
Feds with Martial Law. You know something is happening here in Obama-land,
but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr. Jones?
Jun 04, 2013 How would you like to work for a company that spent $50 million
in the last two years to send its employees to "conferences" on an average of
every other coupla days? You know, to party down and do the hootchie
kootchie on stage while getting drunk? No problem. All you gotta
do is join The Internal Revenue Service. Recession proof. Big
bonuses. High pay for doing nothing but ensuring that the IRS harasses
American citizens and threatens to shut down their businesses, burden them
with ever more taxes, and drag them through the IRS Tax Court in which you
get to try to prove your innocence rather that the standard US court system
in which you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Why
are we surprised? Why would anybody ever think that a taxing agency
with the illegal powers that have been bestowed upon it over the last 100
years would not evolve into the monster agency that he has become? All
government agencies that have been created in order to save us from one
thing or another rest upon false premises to begin with. Namely, if
people in a free market are so bad that they are continually screwing each
other over, how is it that those same people are able to create a government
bureau that doesn't do the same thing -- and with complete impunity since
they are now the government. The entire line of reasoning that we need
more government to save us from ourselves is illogical at face value; it is
a complete contradiction. If the people are too stupid or corrupt to
live in freedom, then they are too stupid to create an agency to do the same
thing they are not able to do in freedom. And here's the upshot:
in a free market, the government exists to prosecute the bad guys. In
a centrally managed government, bureaucracies become the bad
guys and then there is nobody to protect anybody from anything.
Welcome to the IRS in Obama's America today.
Jun 02, 2013 Ah yes, "Common Core." Another government reinvention of
our failing public education system. First, it was George Bush's
"Leave No Child Behind." Then it was Obama's "Race To The Top."
Now it's Obama's 2nd term "Common Core." I predict next year it will
be "Oh Crap, We Done Screwed Up Again." The problem has nothing to do
with education per se. It's GOVERNMENT education that's the problem.
The Liberals keep waiting for the "good socialists" to show up and they
always act shocked that we always get only the "bad socialists." What
they don't understand is that there is no such thing as the "good
socialists." That's like saying, "Oh yoo-hoo, only drink the good
Arsenic," and everything will be OK. Uh huh. Like
"socialism" per se isn't already a bankrupt concept. Try freedom; it
-- Thur May 30,
2013 The "ultimate Presidential control—the ability to bring
armed American forces to bear anywhere in the world within hours—has existed
for over 25 years. It exists precisely because of past mistakes and
embarrassing moments brought to us by various governmental agencies,
congresses, and presidents.
Since September 11th, 2012,
we have been treated to a tractor-trailer load of misdirection, disingenuous
speeches, television appearances, and outright lying by public officials at
every level of the government of the United States of America. Now with
other scandals hitting the news, we are beginning to forget and confuse what
is the only important point to know after we acknowledge and pray for the
four Americans murdered by terrorists that fateful day.
There is one simple point to
be made about Benghazi: the President of the United States is the only human
being on the planet that can order a bullet, a missile, a plane, a drone, a
boat, a helicopter, a soldier, sailor, spy, or push cart with a squirt gun
attached to go into another country and perform an aggressive action.
On September 11, 2012, we
know the President failed to give that order. We don’t know where he was,
what he was doing, or why he failed to act. But we do know he failed to act,
and that inaction cost the lives of four brave Americans." -- Breitbart News
May 30, 2013 US Attorney General Eric Holder, President Obama's consigliore
in his Mafia-run Empire, will probably be thrown under the bus by Obama
because dummy Eric got caught lying under oath to Congress. Asking US
AG Holder to "investigate" his own "investigation of himself and the IRS," is
reminiscent of the new black sheriff in the movie comedy called Blazing
Saddles, in which the sheriff comes running out of his office -- in order to
escape his pursuers -- holding his own gun to his head and pretending to
hold himself as his own hostage. "Everybody back off, back off, I say,
or I gonna kill the hostage, ya hear!? I'll do it, I'll shoot da
Ni%$er..." expletive deleted, but you get the point. The space under
Obama's sacrificial bus is going to get really crowded real soon since
Congress just sent a subpoena to the new US Secretary of State, John Kerry,
to fork over all the emails between Holder and da Boyz at the IRS regarding
the IRS's abuse of power in (1) the targeting and confiscation of AP and FOX
journalists' personal and business communications (emails, etc.) and (2) the
targeting, harassment, and auditing of Conservative and Tea Party political
groups who were either trying to obtain a 501 C 4 tax exempt status or
contributed to GOP political party candidates. And it went a lot
further than that. The IRS dashed into the Gibson Guitar Company and
confiscated $5 million worth of electric guitars, acoustic guitars, and
other equipment claiming the guitar company was illegally using
environmentally-protected wood to construct its guitars. The IRS
backed off and never took Gibson Guitar Co. to court because Gibson did not
break any US or foreign laws in obtaining or using their guitar wood.
But Gibson is still out the 5 milsky. Coincidentally, the President of
Gibson Guitar had contributed campaign donations to the GOP. I bring
this particular issue up in this article because (1) I own and play a
classic Gibson Guitar ES-355TD, and (2) those musicians across the nation
who are left Liberals need to get their heads screwed on straight about what
President Obama and his administration is doing to our country: using
the IRS and other governmental agencies such as the EPA, OSHA, as well as
the IRS, to beat up on first, the Tea Party and Libertarians, and then after
they run out of Libertarians, they will be coming for YOU -- oh great
musicians who are FOR civil liberties, gay rights, women's rights, etc.
I propose that all musicians should boycott all performances for President
Obama at the While House or anywhere else this president asks you to
perform. It is outrageous that this administration used the IRS to
attack one of the major sources of our music -- Gibson Guitar Company -- in
order to gain political power in the Executive Branch. Those musicians
who still don't "get it," you may as well be playing for Hitler as he
persecuted the Jews who serviced your Stradivarius' and built other musical
instruments in the 1930s. Nothing like supporting your own downfall if
you voted for Obama. As the accompanying article on this home page
says, we should "Abolish the IRS and the Income Tax with it." And on
the way to doing that, Congress should throw US AG Holder, and a whole host
of other IRS management under the bus. Don't wait till the IRS attacks
Fender Guitar Co. -- or did they already? Check it out. What
this administration is doing is obscene.
May 26, 2013 Perhaps we are lucky that Barack Obama was elected in both
2008 and 2012 as President of the United States. That way, we got beat
over the head with the left Liberal ideology of altruistic state
collectivism early on, in one big whopping fell swoop. We are now experiencing
first hand -- in fast motion, fast and furious motion -- how economies
evolve from a half-ass free market (mixed economy) directly to national
socialism. Not since the 1930s have we have such an opportunity. ObamaCare with the IRS running our national socialist
health care program is about as Hitlerian Brown Shirt as you can get.
Just think, if we had elected a Republican In Name Only (RINO) -- such as
Mitt Romney -- or your standard Hillary Clinton
type of left Liberal, they would have fed us their poisonous Marxist ideology
piece meal, very slowly, so we would have never noticed how we were evolving
from a free market to a whoop-tee-doo, gung ho, full-fledged military
dictatorship with Der Fuhrer, Barack Obama, at the top dispensing favors, cookies, money,
and crackerjacks to his/her friends and government accomplices. This
is exactly what is going on with both the RINOs and President Barack Obama
today, only at breakneck speed. The major root of all evil in the economy today
is the destruction of all of our values as our money has been destroyed because that is what money really
is, in reality, an exchange of values. Money is not paper. Money is not even gold.
Money is a medium of economic exchange, an exchange of prioritized values
between individuals. And when that value system between free
individuals is taken over and counterfeited into fake values by either a government or a
group of bankers sanctioned to perform theft by a government, then that is
the end of your society, your culture, your economy. The slow
transition of switching our money from gold and silver, to paper, to
plastic, and then to simply numbers created out of nowhere on a big
mainframe computer in the bowels of the Federal Reserve central banks is, in
actuality, the slow transition of dumping our society's values and replacing
them with lies, lies, and then more lies. Hence, we have inflated Federal
Reserve Notes, wrecking the free market process of price creation in the
market, lying to the citizens about the stored values of their money in a
bank, or a Certificate of Deposit, or an annuity, interest rates, or even the value of
gold stock which the central bankers are currently manipulating on a daily
basis in the commodities market. This process of destroying all of our values in the economy,
both financially and morally, was
greatly sped up with the election of President Barack Obama as he has
doubled our national debt from $10 trillion to $17 trillion in 4 short
years and is trying to force the IRS between you and your doctor. Not understanding what money really is or how it represents a
moral value system, Obama is on such a rapid path of economic destruction -- and
thus total value destruction -- that it is now becoming quite obvious to
even the most liberal of the Liberals in this nation. They are now
concerned; they are running for cover from Obama and his immoral culture of
corruption. If this fast
forward to national socialism helps us to understand sooner and
more clearly how bad it would be living under that type of regime and thus helps us to not go
in that direction, then that is all for the good. So maybe we should
be thanking President Barack Obama for enlightening us much earlier than we
otherwise would have been about the Laws of Cause and Effect -- although
not intentionally on his part. One wonders that if Obama's Perfect
Storm of (1) his Benghazi Incident of getting our Ambassador murdered while
trying to cover up his international gun running to Al Qaeda, (2) his use of
the IRS to deny tax exempt status to Conservative and Tea Party groups, and
(3) his use of the Justice Department to spy upon and rip off AP
journalists' personal communications, if that tri-fective screwing over of
our moral values does not wake up Americans about how socialism evolves in an
economy, then nothing will. So, thank you Mr. President, for the fast
track lesson in How To Get To National Socialism Faster Than Hell. We
know you meant well, but the road to Hell is paved with good but stupid
intentions. Presidents and central bankers rarely see or care about
the disastrous results of their policies, the inflation, the unemployment,
and the wars. And even if they do, it's always somebody else's fault.
Now it's time for an impeachment. You, Mr. President, your
impeachment. For all the high crimes, felonies, and misdemeanors
you've committed against the citizens of the United States. Time to
get back to individual rights, freedom to voluntarily exchange, and a real
May 23, 2013 IRS Tax Exemption Director, Lois Lerner, planned to take the
Fifth Amendment when called to testify before the US Congress yesterday.
So she took the stand and immediately issued a statement saying she was a
good little girl, never took the candy from the cookie jar, didn't break any
laws, goes to church every Sunday, never swears, eats her asparagus before
getting her ice cream, and closes with, "and I am not answering any
questions today and am invoking my 5th Amendment privilege, so there, nya
nya nya nya nya." Whoa, hey wait a minute, girl friend. First,
can one invoke the 5th Amendment Privilege while testifying before the US
Congress? After all, it ain't a court room. If the answer is
'NO,' then Ms. Lerner could go to jail for contempt. Number two, if
the answer to (1) is yes, just like in a court room, one cannot waltz,
jitterbug, or foxtrot into court, make statements of denial, "Like, yo, I
did not rob that bank," and then proceed to take the 5th Amendment.
Once you open your big fat mouth and start talking, you have waived your 5th
Amendment rights to further questioning and answering or else what is the
purpose of the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights? If you say you are
standing on the 5th Amendment for ALL of the upcoming questions, then invoke
it and shut up. But don't show up to court or Congress and start
issuing all sorts of statements and denials and then claim you're not going
to answer any future questions because you're standing on the Fifth.
Either stand on the 5th or don't. And while it is OK to take the 5th
on your choice of questions, then do so but don't sit there and say you are
taking the 5th on all further questions that haven't been asked yet and then
rant and rave about your innocence to questions that haven't been asked yet.
Ms. Lerner's attorneys must be idiots. Remember, the reason one takes
the 5th Amendment is because one is claiming that an answer to a question
may tend to incriminate oneself and one cannot be compelled to testify
against oneself. So if you don't know the question yet, how can you
know that said future question may tend to incriminate you? This is
just more of the same
arrogant action by IRS employees lately who have been called before Congress
to answer for wrongdoings and don't want to answer any questions. Just why
were you running a program of tax exempt discrimination against
Conservatives, Tea Partiers, and other Patriot groups, Ms. IRS goon? Tell
us. and, more importantly, tell us WHO gave you that order to do so,
so that we can trace it all the way back to whichever oval room in the White
House it originated. Oops, did I give you a clue? I doubt it
was in the kitchen or the laundry room.
May 13, 2013 Time for the US Congress to impeach Mr. Peachy Obama.
Why? For lying to the American public about why he told the US
military guarding the Benghazi Consulate to "stand down" and allow our
ambassador and three other Americans to be slaughtered on the premises.
And why would Mr. Impeachment-bait do that? Because it looks like he
was trying to cover up the running of guns to the Muslim Brotherhood in
Syria. Not that the Syrian government is any great saint.
Neither the Syrian government or the Muslim Brotherhood are fighting for
individual rights and freedoms. They're both just different shades of
altruistic state collectivism, or rather altruistic church collectivism,
same thing in the Middle East. But the problem with Obama playing this
dangerous game is that he apparently was willing to sacrifice American
officials and then try to cover it all up by hoaking up a phony anti-Muslim
video and blaming it on some poor nitwit producer in Hollywood. And
while Sec of State Hillary Clinton may not have given the "stand down"
orders -- mainly because the Joint chiefs of Staff do not report to the
Bitch of State who likes to lie to US Congressional investigators -- she
participated in the whole UN Ambassador Susan Rice fake video ruse.
And Clinton had the temerity to scream -- literally scream -- at the US
Congressional investigators, "At this point, who cares" about how the
terrorists overran the Benghazi Consulate and raped, tortured, and murdered
our Ambassador and three other Americans. "Maybe the terrorists were
just out for a stroll, or maybe who knows whaterver," she implied as she
then yelled, "At this point, who cares, the deed is done?" Well, Bitch
of State Clinton, guess what? The murdered victims' families care.
We care. We care because now we know what you think of us. Now
we know what Obama and YOU think of us American citizens and how you
wouldn't hesitate to throw us to the wolves if it advances your political
agenda both here and abroad. It's one thing to have done the murderous
deed, both at the Obama "stand down" level and the Clinton "I'll go along
with that" level; but it's quite another to blame some poor innocent slob
making a Grade F anti-Muslim movie, send our UN Ambassador Susan Rice around
to lie on all the major TV network talk shows, and try to cover it all up.
Nixon resigned over a 10-cent Watergate burglary that was nothing but a
pissy-assy bugging of the opposition party's politicians. They got him
for obstruction of justice and the cover up, not the bugging crime.
Obama and Thugs, however, set up a murder of four Americans to hide their
nefarious gun running to the Muslim Brotherhood rebels, and then tried to
cover it up. If this isn't an impeachable offense, then I don't know
what is. President Obama and former Sec of State Clinton deserve at
least to be booted out of politics: as in forever. And today
can't be too soon. Strike three, Bud, you're outta there!
May 07, 2013 Interesting article by Dan Popkey in the Idaho Statesman
about one of our Idaho US Senators: Jim Risch. Just by analyzing
quotes from Sen. Risch about how he feels about living and working in
the political atmosphere of The District (Wash DC), one can glean a lot
about why America has such a huge social-political-financial problem. Namely, Sen. Risch says, "You know, I
really enjoy this job. I really like this job." Think
about that statement for a moment. Any normal, free market, limited
government statesman -- but not a RINO politician or left Liberal state
collectivist bent on expanding more and more governmental intervention into your life
-- would never say how much he "really enjoys,
really likes" his political job in Washington DC. He should
have said the job was disgusting at every level -- intellectually, socially,
politically, and morally -- and that he was there to UNDO the tons and tons
of bureaucratic crap that has been dumped upon American citizens for the
last 100 years. Instead, Sen. Risch loves to dabble in international
affairs, taking lots of vacations -- oops, I mean fact-finding trips --
overseas, and compares his lavish and rather open-ended job in the US Senate to his
short stint as Idaho Lt. Gov and an even shorter stint as Gov. saying,
"Governor will wear you down. You can't do that
job permanently. This (as a US Senator) you can do ad infinitum."
Really? "Ad infinitum?" What message is Sen. Risch sending the public
-- especially his voting constituents in Idaho? Remember
Sen. Risch is a millionaire and can afford a condo on Pennsylvania Ave.
And he and his wife Vicki apparently like to party down. Like, a lot.
"Relatively frequently," quote unquote.
Risch and wifester Vicki love their membership on the board of Ford's
Theatre. Last year, says reporter Popkey, Mrs. Risch chaired a
luncheon for First Lady Michelle Obama, organized by Senate spouses.
Ooooh, what fun! President Obama and First Lady Michelle are busy
trying to bankrupt the US with their national socialist ideology straight
from Karl Marx's playbook, and RINO Sen. Jim Risch and his wifester are busy
throwing parties for them. Even reporter Dan Popkey, left Liberal as
they come, is beginning to see the writing on the wall. What writing?
The writing in which Sen. Risch says that everybody in The District gets along just
swell, despite the failure of the Senate to agree on matters VITAL to the
nation's future. Says Risch, "You hear about
this toxic atmosphere," but when the Parliament of Whores get
together to party down, Risch says to Popkey, "we talk about our kids, we
talk about sports. ... Socially, the people are incredibly, incredibly civil
to each other." But here's the coup de grace from
Sen. Risch, answering Popkey about the huge amount of time that US
Congressmen take off from work in Washington,
"There's nothing happening when we're back there (The District) and there's
nothing happening when we're not
back there. What's the difference?"
And that is the problem: with 435 Representatives and 100 Senators in
Congress who hold this same view, it's no wonder that NOTHING -- and
I mean NOTHING -- will ever get done RE cutting back our behemoth government
bureaucracy, hundred trillion dollar unfunded deficits, $17 trillion annual
budget deficit, and continual social and military intervention into the
lives of the individual here and abroad. Bedrock concepts such as
individual and private property rights have now been
over-ridden by the ideology of politicians such as Idaho's US Senator Jim Risch who
"really, really likes" his big time PARTY DOWN job in The
District. As RINO Risch closed off his interview with left Liberal
reporter Dan Popkey, "You can do a lot more
of what you want to do (compared to state level politics). There's 100
senators, 435 congressmen; we all have our own ideas, our own passions in
life. We all have our own interests and you can pursue them."
Well, no $hit, Little Beaver. And that's exactly what's wrong with
Washington DC. 535 politicians and The President all dashing off in
different directions pursuing their own personal interests instead of
pursuing freedom for the individual. What happened to the concept that our congressmen are
supposed to be supporting our US Constitution and Bill of Rights with limited government?
Private property rights? Individual rights and responsibilities?
President Obama and RINO Senators like Jim Risch of Idaho -- yes, Idaho of
all places, supposedly the
most Conservative state in the nation, what a joke -- are too busy throwing
"incredibly civil" parties while
implementing their altruistic state collectivist
"interests." With an emphasis on
"interests." Good report, Popkey, socialist that
you are; you hit the nail on the head for once.
Apr 16, 2013 So much for the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
doing its pretended job of regulating the
Federal Reserve's central banking members' collusion in choreographing the
naked shorts price decline of all precious metals last Friday and Monday.
This is a
classic example of how Liberals' drag us into government regulations and
bureaucracies that turn out to be The Fox watching The Hen House.
First they claim the free market must be
regulated by the government. And then they pave the way for the crooks
to become the regulators. They never ask: who is going to watch the Watchers? Who
watches the central bankers? Nobody. It is the
central bankers (directly or through their little puppets) who BECOME the government regulators,
e.g., the CFTC. There
IS NOBODY watching anybody. In fact, it is far worse. The crooks
have now become the watchers and are in a great position to do
whatever they want to do "legally." Something they could
never have done in a true free market whose governmental function is to
prohibit that which the government bureaucracy can now do with impunity. Same for the EPA. Same for
the FDA. Same for all the supposed government Watch Dogs whose stupid
Liberal-created function was to "protect" us all from the very
which they were ostensibly created. And THAT is what is wrong with the
stupid Liberal ideology of altruistic state collectivism and their little fairytale view of how the real world works.
At least in a true free market, the crooks can be caught and sent to jail.
In the Liberals' socialist system, the crooks run the jail. They run
the legal system and everything else because they have become the
government. In a free market
the crooks do not run the legal system; and the crooks would have a very
difficult time -- if not impossible -- of creating a "banking" monopoly, a
"Military Industrial Complex" monopoly, a "Food and Drug Administration"
monopoly, and on and on through the entire labyrinth of government regulation
and bureaucracy. And both major US political parties are guilty for
destroying the free market in banking, destroying our money, destroying our food
and health care systems, energy, communications, the mail, the railroads, and very
importantly: education. The bureaucrats and our socialist President Barack Obama continue forcing the central government down our throats with
more and more onerous legislation and Executive Orders. Meanwhile
Congress and the US Supreme Court -- I give you Chief Justice John Roberts
who could have saved the US economy by voting YES to dump Obamacare -- sit
by idly and watch it all happen... watch the US economy go down the tubes.
All because our education system has stunted the brains of our younger
the realm of basic philosophy, basic economics, and basically HOW to reason,
HOW to use logic, HOW to think. There appears to be no slowing down of
almost EVERYBODY asking for more and more governmental intrusion into our
daily lives. The current generation seems to be more interested in
"security" -- faux security at that -- and eager to give up their freedoms
for said fake "security." Nothing is what it seems anymore. We are truly
living in an Orwellian world of '1984' while proclaiming, "Wow, let's not go down the path of '1984.'" No
worries on that note, folks. We're
already there. Your money ain't worth $hit... as you are
now discovering at restaurants, grocery stores, and gas stations. But
JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs just made a killing in the 'managed' markets
last Friday and Monday, forcing an obscene "short sale" blowout and then buying up
tons of contracts after the prices bottomed. Not a free market.
Not even close. Thanks to the stupid Liberals and Conservatives who
created central banking and the CFTC's fake "watch dogs."
Apr 10, 2013 How is America different than the Titanic? A: The passengers on
the Titanic didn't vote to hit the iceberg! Welcome to Obamacare.
Speaking of phony balonies, Bill Maher pretends to be a Libertarian, then
bashes Libertarianism because it's not European socialist enough.
Liberals want to implement the "good" socialism, not the "bad" socialism.
Yeah, Liberals want to force you to drink the "good" arsenic, not the "bad"
arsenic because they have yet to learn that it is the arsenic that is the
problem. "Good" and "bad" are merely the chronological stages at which
point you are in socialism: i.e. "good" is the fairytale
idea of socialism, "bad" is the actual
practice of socialism. That's why
Liberals think you can have a "mixed" economy, full of oxymorons and
outright contradictions such as (1) a government-controlled free market,
public private property rights, freedom of gov't approved speech, freedom of
gov't approved religion, freedom of gov't approved association, freedom of
gov't approved travel, freedom of gov't approved health care, freedom of
gov't approved education, and the freedom to rip off your neighbors --
called taxation -- based upon your real or imagined "needs." And most
importantly, something that Liberals will never understand: what is
money? Since they don't know what "money" really is and why central
banks are the real problem, they will never be able to "solve" any of their
economic fairytale visions AND it is precisely why they hate -- and will
never understand -- Ayn Rand and her Objectivist philosophy. Show me a
Liberal who can tell you what real money is and I will show you a
Libertarian, which is why a Liberal is a Liberal in the first place:
because they are still at the kindergarten level of understanding praxeology
and the basic laws of economics. Next time you are at a dinner party
with a Liberal and they are blowing off about social-political-economics,
simply start discussing Austrian free market economics and how prices are
formed in a market and they will just sit there looking dumbfounded with
their thumbs stuck up their butts or they may try to crack a lame joke to
change the subject. It is not our socialist president Obama that is
the problem; it's all the little idiots who voted for Obama that are the
problem because they are representative of the level to which our
intellectualism has devolved.
Apr 07, 2013 Ah yes, Obamacare "Navigators."
Exactly what this nation now needs to push our economy right down the tubes
into total national socialism. What the hell is an Obamacare
Navigator? What kind of federal job
is that? A Navigator is a previous
Obama Acorn neighborhood "organizer" -- or pimp -- whose job it will be to
explain to the public, door to door, how to
navigate through the bureaucratic federal health care maze that
is being shoved down our throats because US Supreme Court Justice Roberts
did not have the balls to call a spade a spade: i.e. Obamacare should
have been dumped a long time ago because it is obviously unconstitutional.
A 12-year child could have figured that out. Obama's cleverly created
new militia of health care police, the Navigators,
are slated to be paid up to $48 per hour, which is about $100,000 per year
plus benefits. How many Navigators
does Obama think we might need in the US? Estimates for California are
21,000 Navigators. Crunching the
numbers, if CA has 38 million people and the US population is 315 million,
that means the US needs about 8.3 x 21,000
Navigators. That equals about 175,000
Navigators to tell Americans how to
navigate through our screwed up
nationalized health care system. What else will these Navigators do?
According to the White House, Navigators
should be the same ethnic percentage of those whose neighborhoods they will
be invading. That way, they will all be speaking the same 'George
Orwell 1984' New Speak, especially when the
Navigators get to the bottom of their forms and ask Joe Citizen
for his political affiliation information. No lie. They will be
asking for the home owner's/renter's political affiliation. And, oh
yeah, they will also be asking about each Joe Doe's personal medical
information so they can do their job of navigating
the poor slob through Obama's 2,700 pages of federal health care bullshit,
which even Congress and the President can't decipher. But the
Navigators can. Somehow.
Because as soon as you attach the words 'federal government' to anything, it
becomes clear as a bell. Ding dong. How do you feel about
telling some pimp-looking Bozo knocking on your door all about Aunt Tillie's
back ache, sister Suzie's pregnancy, and Mom's cancer treatment, plus give
out the social security numbers for everybody in the family so the
Navigator can do his/her job? Swoosh,
there goes doctor-patient confidentiality out the door. Bingo, there
goes your SS number into the files of all the computer hackers in the world
as the Navigators figure out they can
make a lot more money selling your personal info to hackers and advertisers
with mailing lists. The sheer invasion of privacy alone should make
Americans and state politicians shudder with fear. Unfortunately, it
didn't make Idaho legislators shudder with anything since the idiots were
the first GOP state to pass a state health care exchange in the nation and
have now been informed -- the dolts -- that the state, not the federal
government -- gets to pick up the costs for their state
Navigators. Yeah, really brilliant,
Gov Butch Otter. Really brilliant. Didn't see that one coming
did you? And there will be lots more bureaucracy coming Idaho's way,
too. We tried to tell you not to deal with the devil but you wouldn't
listen. Maybe you'll catch on later, who knows?
Mar 04, 2013 The Federal Reserve is claiming that it is
"buying" $45 billion
in Treasury bonds and $40 billion in mortgage bonds per month. Lying
sacks of crap. The Fed isn't "buying" anything. They are simply
printing or digitizing more paper debt. A bond is a debt. It is
a deficit. "Buying" implies the purchase of something. With
what, exactly, is the Fed "buying" more debt?
Nothing. They have no collateral, no money that they didn't already
print or digitize on a computer from thin air. This is just
make-believe money. And at YOUR expense because you, dear taxpayer, will be paying
the national debt that this make-believe money is charged to. Once again, the Fed is pretending that they are
printing wealth -- $85 billion per month -- and that they are thereby
enriching all Americans in this silly game. If the Fed was really
"buying" bonds, they would have said how much gold or silver or some other
commodity they were exchanging for the bonds. Instead, they are just making
up new money from thin air and claiming they are
"buying" bonds with something, who knows what. Schuck and jive, schuck and jive. In the old days we
called it by its rightful name: counterfeiting. Only
now, it's "legal" counterfeiting and Economic Village Idiots at
universities receive Nobel Prizes for babbling about the virtues of counterfeiting
in today's modern economy. The Feds call it Quantitative Easing.
How quaint. Idiot presidents -- such as Barack Obama and our current congressmen
-- call it
stimulating the economy. I prefer to call a spade a spade.
Counterfeiting. Or, Quantitative
Easing III -- because this is the third time around for this recent ridiculous
Keynesian counterfeiting. It's just a piece of unadulterated crap and, if not
stopped, will be the death of the United States' financial system. All done, to be sure,
with "good intentions" by our "best president ever: Barack Obama."
The central bank counterfeiting $85 billion per month, a trillion dollars
per year, called Quantitative Easing. Unbelievable.
Jan 26, 2013 That huge sucking sound you hear in your neighborhood is the
fruits of your labor being siphoned from your job, your home, your savings
account, your income and -- most importantly -- the VALUE of your dollar on
a ghost train to DC. Why is it a ghost train? Because nobody can
see it. It is invisible. But you can hear it; you can feel it.
Your biggest tax is not income taxes or social security. Your biggest
tax -- never seen but always experienced -- is the continual inflation of
your money supply by the government, namely the Federal Reserve who is busy
managing the government, no matter what Obama thinks. How does one
revolt against a stacked deck, against a central government that is busy
robbing the crap out of its people with an invisible weapon -- the devaluing
dollar -- over which you have zero control? Or will the Keynesian
Economic system of "value robbery" -- inflating your currency -- implode in
on itself? How? Food costs. Yes, girl friends, food costs.
Have you noticed the price of potatoes recently? And chicken, beef,
fish, wheat, milk -- oops subsidized -- fruit, rice, cookies, ice cream,
etc.? Yes, you will be paying even more next year for your basic
staples: peanut butter sandwiches, hamburgers and French Fries, and
pizza. Americans will survive and pay the higher costs and bitch about
it, temporarily. But what about in Greece, Italy, Algeria, China,
Russia, Japan, Egypt, Libya, and the entire continent of Africa? These
guys are already starving and food prices in those countries are
skyrocketing. That puts a huge demand on importing food from America.
Which, in turn, will put a huge demand on the price of potatoes in Idaho.
Which means the price of those hamburgers and French Fries will go through
the roof. And now the fate of those billions of individuals in Third
World countries will be affecting the price of food at YOUR grocery store.
Your grocery bill. Food on your table. Forget that vacation.
Forget that 2nd car. Forget college. Forget a lot of things.
Food will always come first. In fact, food riots due to skyrocketing
food prices were the major cause of national revolutions throughout all of
history: the French Revolutions in the 1700s and 1800s, the Russian
Revolution of 1917, and on and on. So, as it turns out, you, the
average American, don't have to do anything to stop the Federal Reserve from
hyper-inflating your currency since they are already doing it to themselves
by bringing about a food riot in America after sparking food riots in the
Third World nations. Hopefully, Iran doesn't try to swipe your French
Fries by launching suitcase nukes or worse. Or would they? Thank
you, central bankers of the world for all the future food riots that will
soon engulf our globe. Then again, that's one sure way to implement a
system of population control: hyper-inflate the currency until the
serfs knock each other off, grabbing for the rationed French Fries, wheat,
bread, meat, and finally eating dirt cookies as they already do in Haiti.
Eating dirt cookies. You think it can't happen here? Watch what
is soon going to happen next year in Egypt, Greece, Italy, England, Russia,
China, and Lower Slobovia as bread lines turn into bread riots.
Jan 25, 2013 More on Sec of State Hillary Clinton and the so-called
Congressional Inquiry into what happened regarding the Benghazi Murders at
our US Embassy in Libya. First, it was not an inquiry. All
Democratic Senators on the committee simply smooched Hillary Clinton's butt
and gave a speech. Second, only three Republicans asked Hillary any
pertinent questions. Third, Hillary did not answer any questions --
pertinent or not -- but
rather went off on tirades that had nothing to do with a real inquiry.
But the really horrible thing that happened was that the whole
"investigative" circus reveals how absurd Congress has become, what low
level bureaucrats the US now has installed in important positions of power
-- such as Sec of State -- and how bad off the US will be perceived in the
near future. Ms. Clinton stated that the State Dept has 70,000
employees. 70,000 employees! If we have 70 embassies in 70 major
countries, that's 1,000 State Dept employees at each embassy. What
overkill! What could all these clowns be doing? Certainly not
their jobs or else we wouldn't be talking about the Benghazi Murders at an
investigative hearing in Congress. Hillary states that she was not
aware of much of anything. She had no budget money, she claims, but
Sen. Rand Paul pointed out all the millions of dollars the State Dept has
spent on parties and other crap. Hillary, in response to Sen.
Johnson's question about the sequence of events that brought about the
Benghazi Murders and storming and burning of our embassy, literally jumped
out of her chair and screamed, "Who cares? We have four dead people.
What difference does it make whether it was a terrorist act or some guy
decided it would be fun to knock off Americans at our Libyan Embassy?"
But wait a minute, Ms. Sec of State. It DOES make a difference and
that is precisely WHY we are conducting this hearing. As Sen. Rand
Paul stated, "I would have relieved you of your post, Ms. Secretary."
Sen. Paul asked whether Hillary was aware of what was going on in a huge
warehouse building next to the Benghazi Embassy since it was widely rumored that
guns and other weapons may have been stored and distributed from said
building as there has been a lot of recent shipping activity nearby.
Hillary said she did not know anything about the goings on at a building
next door. I have an important
question for Hillary: if you are building an embassy, doesn't it
behoove you to know what is going on around your embassy? Same with
the supposed Osama bin Laden compound in Pakistan right next door to
Pakistan's "West Point." Doesn't it behoove the Pakistani govt AND the
US to know
what the hell is going on in what looks like Ft. Knox down the road apiece?
Duh. Bottom line: Obama has no foreign policy; Sec of State
Hillary Clinton was just a low level mindless bureaucrat going through the
motions, and Congress is showing itself to be totally irrelevant. Along with the Judicial
Dept and all of Washington DC. You are now witnessing the rapid
decline of the American Republic. If anybody who worked for me replied
as Hillary has over the last two days, I would have immediately fired their
little asses. Which is exactly what should have happened to Ms.
Clinton four months ago. And our US President is not even a legitimate citizen,
much less a president of anything. At most, he's a puppet of the
Federal Reserve. Plus, the GOP has totally imploded
into it's own altruistic state collectivism, no different than the economic
fascists who call themselves "progressives."
Jan 23, 2013 Sec of State Hillary Clinton has now recovered sufficiently
from her fake "bonk on the head" to show up to a Congressional Inquiry about
the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the Benghazi Embassy murders in
Libya last year that took four American lives. Prez Obama and
Ambassador Rice concocted a ridiculous story that some bozo in Hollywood
created a YouTube video that made fun of Muslims and Allah, and that that
sparked a riot against the US compound in Libya. Rice ran around
babbling this YouTube video excuse on all the major TV talk shows, President
Obama babbled this same excuse in the Rose Garden with Hillary standing by
clinching her teeth and not looking like she agreed with him, and the FBI
even arrested and detained some guy in Hollywood who supposedly produced or
financed or shot the alleged video. We now know that the YouTube video
excuse was total bull dukie. The big question is: why did Obama
and the administration try to pull the wool over America's eyes? What
was really going on? Did the Obama administration try to do a "fast
and furious" guns deal out of Libya with other nations such as Turkey, like
the failed "fast and furious" guns deal with Mexico? Or is Obama and
his administration really just a bunch of bunglers in foreign affairs?
Now, Sec of State Hillary Clinton is testifying before Congress that (1) she
needs more money, (2) it's her responsibility but wasn't her fault (really?
how does that work?), (3) American embassies are being attacked all over the
world (I wonder why), (4) she has implemented a new better plan so it will
never happen again, (5) Obama did the right thing, (6) Ambassador Rice did
the right thing, and (7) blah blah blah bureaucratic double-talk about
everything except the who, what, when, where, why and how behind the
Benghazi incident. Nobody asked Sec of State Clinton any REAL
questions -- except Senators John McCain and Rand Paul who completely
disagreed with her answers, refuted all of them, and ripped her a new one.
In short, the upshot of the congressional hearing today was nothing except
the Liberals kissing Hillary's butt, only one or two GOP senators standing
up to slap her stupid answers silly, and all that was accomplished is that
Hillary was a good little girl who pretended to exonerate the Obama
administration -- and cover her own ass -- so she can run for the Oval
Office in 2016. Nobody, and I mean nobody, except possibly Sen. Rand
Paul at other times outside today's Benghazi Hearings, have asked the
fundamental question: what the hell is the US doing sticking its nose
in the business of all the nations in the Middle East in the first place?
We are there because the central bankers and OPEC oil ministers are hell
bent on fixing the monopoly price of oil, forcing all participants to use
only Federal Reserve Notes for all oil transactions as agreed upon at the
last Bretten Woods meeting some time ago. And these banking/oil
parties have convinced both GOP and Liberal Congressmen to use the US
Military to protect those fundamental banking interests. So now all we hear
about is a continual tit-for-tat response to whichever side's latest
bombing, or who shot at who last week, or who blew up which embassy or trade
center last. It's no different than two tribes in the jungle
committing atrocities against each other for whatever the other tribe did
last week. America has been reduced to a feud between the Hatfields
and the McCoys. Nobody wants to ask the fundamental question.
And the people who keep the wars going, the bankers, the oil companies, the
arms manufacturers, the vendors supplying the military, and the bureaucrats
who wring their hands at committee hearings such as the Benghazi Murders and
bloviate a bunch of bullshit are busy running the Big Show. With you,
the taxpayer, financing all of it -- in more ways than you will ever know.
Hyper-inflation of non gold-backed money has serious consequences, both
nationally and internationally. If you do not understand how the
central bankers are the fundamental root problem, then you do not understand
what money really is. And Hillary may get away with the Benghazi
debacle and run for president in 2016.
U of Idaho
Wallace pleads GUILTY in $136 mil University Place fiasco...
Deep Throat II, Deepest Throat...how
many damn Deep Throats are there in Idaho anyway?
About the author...I
was born at the Alamo. Then we moved to Japan. Then to
California, where I learned the dirty bop. Attended UC Berkeley.
Got drafted into the Army. Worked for the Assistant Chief of Staff,
Intelligence, in the Pentagon and Saigon, Vietnam...in a steel vault two
feet thick with cipher locks. Top Secret Crypto Eyes Only security
clearance. Cranked up four corporations. Managed Pacific
Northwest branch of a NY Software Company. Moved to Boise,
Idaho. I'm an investigative journalist writing under a fake name.
Nobody would name their kid "Deep." And no, my last name is not
"Throat." I dig up dirty laundry. Dirty political laundry.
On the QT. Hush-hush. It's a dirty job, long hours and the pay
stinks. But it's a living and there's lots of dirty political laundry
in Idaho. I lean over a lot of fences, drink a lot of Rocket Java, and
listen through beer mugs pressed against bathroom walls. Right now I'm
on my way down to check out another dead body at the Idaho State
Legislature. I better be careful...or it might be my own.
-- Deep Throat II Contact author
What they're saying about
"Of course it was a fix.
It's an incestuous mess."
-- Senator Stan Hawkins (R-Ucon), 18-year
legislator who voted NO on the University Place fiasco
"You are on the right track.
But you need deeper background. I have it. I know where every
skeleton is buried. But I need deepest cover. You cannot reveal
anything about me, not even where or how or by what means you obtain info
from me. Zip, zilch, zero, nada. You must protect this source
even if a judge threatens to send you to jail for contempt."
-- Deepest Throat, anonymous source
"Finally, someone with the
brains and guts enough to connect the dots between the $100 million Ada
County Court House scam and the $136 million University Place fiasco as one
big crime spree against the taxpayers by the Boise lawyers, politicians, and
Cryptic Partners. A fast read, this book deserves to become a best
-- Sharon Ullman, Ada County Commissioner (2001-2003,
What is the
Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 3 of 3
by Ayn Rand
annotated by FM Duck
Feb 03, 2011
"11. Is "The
Greatest Good for the Greatest Number" a moral principle?"
the motive change the nature of a dictatorship?"
11. Is "The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number" A Moral Principle?
“The greatest good for the greatest number" is one of the most vicious
slogans ever foisted on humanity.
This slogan has no concrete, specific meaning. There is no way to interpret
it benevolently, but a great many ways in which it can be used to justify
the most vicious actions.
What is the definition of "the good" in this slogan? None, except: whatever
is good for the greatest number. Who, in any particular issue, decides what
is good for the greatest number? Why, the greatest number.
If you consider this moral, you would have to approve of the following
examples, which are exact applications of this slogan in practice: fifty-one
percent of humanity enslaving the other forty-nine; nine hungry cannibals
eating the tenth one; a lynching mob murdering a man whom they consider
dangerous to the community.
There were seventy million Germans in Germany and six hundred thousand Jews.
The greatest number (the Germans) supported the Nazi government which told
them that their greatest good would be served by exterminating the smaller
number (the Jews) and grabbing their property. This was the horror achieved
in practice by a vicious slogan accepted in theory. But, you might say, the
majority in all these examples did not achieve any real good
itself either? No. It didn't, because "the good" is not determined by
counting numbers and is not achieved by the sacrifice of anyone to anyone.
The unthinking assumes that every man who mouths this slogan places himself
unselfishly with the smaller number to be sacrificed to the greatest number
of others. Why should he? There is nothing in the slogan to make him do
this. He is much more likely to try to get in with the greatest number, and
start sacrificing others. What the slogan actually tells him is that he has
no choice, except to rob or be robbed, to crush or get crushed.
The depravity of this slogan lies in the implication that "the good" of a
majority must be achieved through the suffering of a minority; that the
benefit of one man depends upon the sacrifice of another.
If we accept the Collectivist doctrine that man exists only for the sake of
others, then it is true that every pleasure he enjoys (or every bite of
food) is evil and immoral if two other men want it. But on this basis men
cannot eat, breathe or love (all of that is selfish, and what if two other
men want your wife?), men cannot live together at all, and can do nothing
except end up by exterminating one another.
Only on the basis of individual rights can any good -- private or public --
be defined and achieved. Only when each man is free to exist for his own
sake -- neither sacrificing others to himself nor being sacrificed to others
-- only then is every man free to work for the greatest good he can achieve
for himself by his own choice and by his own effort.
And the sum total of such individual efforts is the only kind of general,
social good possible.
Do not think that the opposite of "the greatest good for the greatest
number" is "the greatest good for the smallest number." The real opposite
is: the greatest good one can achieve by one’s own free effort, to everyoneliving.
If you are an Individualist and wish to preserve the American way of life,
What is the
Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 2 of 3
by Ayn Rand
annotated by FM Duck
Feb 02, 2011
"7. How do
we determine that a right has been violated?"
"8. What is
the proper function of government?"
there be a "mixed" social system?"
"10. Can a
society exist without a moral principle?"
7. How Do We Determine That a Right Has Been Violated?
A right cannot be violated except by physical force. One man cannot deprive
another of his life nor enslave him, nor forbid him to pursue happiness,
except by using force against him. Whenever a man is made to act without his
own free, personal, individual,
his right has been violated.
Therefore, we can draw a clear-cut division between the rights of one man
and those of another. It is an
division, not subject to differences of opinion, nor to majority decision,
nor to the arbitrary decree of society.
NO MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO INITIATE THE USE OF PHYSICAL FORCE AGAINST ANOTHER
The practical rule of conduct in a free society, a society of Individualism,
is simple and clear-cut: you cannot expect or demand any action from another
man, except through his free, voluntary consent.
Do not be misled on this point by an old collectivist trick which goes like
this: (1) There is no absolute freedom anyway, since you are not free to
murder, (2) society limits your freedom when it does not permit you to kill,
(3) therefore, society holds the right to limit your freedom in any manner
it sees fit, (4) therefore, drop the delusion of freedom, and (5) freedom is
whatever society decides it is.
society, nor any social right, that forbids you to kill, but the inalienable
right of another man to live. This is not a "compromise" between two rights,
but a line of division that preserves both rights untouched. The division is
not derived from an edict of society, but from your own inalienable
individual right. The definition of this limit is not set arbitrarily by
society, but is implicit in the definition of your own right.
Within the sphere of your own rights, your freedom
8. What Is the Proper Function of Government?
The proper function of government is to protect the individual rights of
man; this means to protect man against brute force.
In a proper social system, men do not use force against one another. Force
may be used only in
that is, in defense of a right violated by force. Men
delegate to the government
the power to use force in retaliation, and
The proper kind of government
initiate the use of force. It uses... More...
What is the
Basic Issue in the World Today? -- Part 1 of 3
by Ayn Rand
annotated by FM Duck
Jan 29, 2011
"1. What is the basic
issue in the world today?"
"2. What is a social
"3. What is the basic
principle of America?"
"4. What is a right?"
"5. What are the
inalienable rights of man?"
"6. How do we
recognize one another's rights?"
1. What Is the Basic Issue in the World Today?
The basic issue in the world today is between two principles: Individualism
holds that man has inalienable rights which cannot be taken away from him by
any other man, nor by any number, group or collective of other men.
Therefore, each man exists by his own right and for his own sake, not for
the sake of the group.
holds that man has no rights; that his work, his body and his personality
belong to the group; that the group can do with him as it pleases, in any
manner it pleases, for the sake of whatever it decides to be its own
Therefore, each man exists only by the permission of the group and for the
sake of the group.
These two principles are the roots of two opposite social systems. The basic
issue of the world today is between these two systems.
2. What Is a Social System?
A social system is a code of laws which men observe in order to live
Such a code must have a basic principle, a starting point, or it cannot be
devised. The starting point is the question: Is the power of society
limited or unlimited?
answers: The power of society is limited by the inalienable, individual
rights of man. Society may make only such laws as do not violate these
answers: The power of society is unlimited. Society may make any laws it
wishes, and force them upon anyone in any manner it wishes.
Example: Under a system of
a million men cannot pass a law to kill one man for their own benefit. If
they go ahead and kill him, they are breaking the law--which protects his
right to life-and they are punished.
Under a system of
a million men (or anyone claiming to represent them) can pass a law to kill
one man (or any minority), whenever they think they would benefit by his
death. His right to live is not recognized.
Under Individualism, it is illegal to kill the man and it is legal for
him to protect himself. The law is on the side of a right. Under
Collectivism, it is legal for the majority to kill a man and it is illegal
for him to defend himself. The law is on the side of a number.
In the first case, the law represents a moral principle.
In the second case, the law represents the idea that there are no
moral principles, and men can do anything they please, provided there are
enough of them.
Under a system of Individualism, men are equal before the law at all
times. Each has the same rights, whether he is alone or has a million others
Under a system of Collectivism, men have to gang up on one another and
whoever has the biggest gang at the moment, holds all rights, while
the loser (the individual or the minority) has none. Any man can be
an absolute master or a helpless slave, according to the size of his gang.
An example of the first system:
The United States of America.
(See: The Declaration of Independence.)
An example of the second system:
[and President Obama’s America today in 2011].
Under the Soviet system, millions of peasants or "kulaks" were
Washington, DC – Politicians
are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign
Have you ever
wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits,
WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever
wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY
do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I
don't propose a federal budget. The president does.
You and I
don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The
House of Representatives does.
You and I
don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I
don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I
don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices
equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally,
morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague
the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by
the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to
provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central
all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no
They have no
ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one
I don't care
if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has
the power to accept... More...
As we move
into the Easter holiday, let's remember what Pope Francis said, "If you have
a resurrection that lasts more than 4 hours, call your doctor immediately."
Holy moley, look how fast America is going bankrupt:
(click on the puddy tat)
Why I Do Not Like the Obamas
originally written Jan 5, 2013 by Mychal Massie in The Daily Rant
2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck
Here's an African American
journalist's opinion of the Obamas. These are his words not mine. Even
if you love Obama, you might take a few minutes to read this because it is
unvarnished in its implications for them and our country.
-- FM Duck
Los Angeles -- The other evening on my
twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obamas. Specifically, I was
asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obamas? It seems personal, not
policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family
The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what
they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and
legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I
responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't
like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our
country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.
I don't hate them per definition, but I
condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist
Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for
the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit
same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous.
I don't like them because they comport
themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no, I demand respect, for the
Office of President, and a love of our country and her citizens from the
leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan
displayed an unparalleled love... More...
So, Just How Bad Was This Super Bowl Rout, Historically Speaking?
By Kenley Young, FOX Sports – Feb 2, 2014, annotated by FM Duck
Note: Super Bowl XLVIII (48 in stupid Roman Numerals that nobody in the
real world ever uses) (i.e., (-X+(L+V+I+I+I)), where L=50, X=10, minus 10
since it’s on the left side of bigger value L, ask the Romans, don’t ask me,
V=5, I=1; Throw Roman Numerals out with the slide rule, OK?)
New York, NY --
Yes, the Denver Broncos looked bad out there on Sunday. Really bad. And
yes, it was a rout of fairly epic proportions, the kind of lopsided affair
we haven't seen in more than a decade.
But no, the
35-point shellacking was not exactly historic.
It wasn't even
the biggest Super Bowl loss in Broncos history. The worst rout in
Super Bowl history? That distinction goes to... More...
Egon von Greyerz,
annotated by FM Duck
Jan 31, 2014
Switzerland -- In November 1910, some powerful US bankers joined by the
influential Paul Warburg had a meeting on Jekyll Island that would determine
the destiny of the world financial system and the world economy for over 100
years. This infamous meeting led to the creation of the Federal Reserve
System in the US on December 23, 1913.
The Fed was
created by private bankers for the benefit of private bankers and today, 100
years later, they have been more successful than they could ever have
imagined in 1913.
Not only have
they created a system that efficiently controls the world financial system
for their personal benefit but also world politics. They totally understood
the advice of Mayer Amschel Rotschild, the founder of the Rothschild banking
dynasty, who famously proclaimed:
“Give me control of the nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”
exactly 100 years now, the Fed and other central bankers have totally
destroyed all major world currencies and left the world with debts that
cannot and will not be repaid with normal money. And whilst achieving this
unprecedented wealth creation for the top level of financiers, they have in
the last 15 years... More...
Magnificent Failure of ObamaCare
by Prof Gary North
Jan 06, 2013
the point of view of a defender of liberty, ObamaCare is the most
magnificent welfare state program of our generation.
Washington, DC -- Premium
expenses are going up for most people. Deductibles are going up for most
people. Cancellation letters are going out to millions of people. The number
of people signing up is less than the number of people who have received
policy-cancellation letters. In short, the costs are being front-loaded, and
the benefits are being back-loaded.
before, welfare state politics has been based on a specific strategy:
"Benefits first. Costs later." This is called front-loading and
back-loading. The best examples of this process are Social Security and
Medicare. The costs are now coming due for these two programs. According to
Prof. Lawrence Kotlikoff, the back-loaded cost of the two programs is now in
the range of $200 trillion, present value. But no one really cares. Those
costs will be imposed in the future. Politicians care only about the
immediate future, namely, the next election.
politicians come to the general public, and they promise that the state will
intervene on the side of the middle class. The state will do so also to help
the poor. The costs will be borne exclusively by the rich. Politicians are
careful never to define how much money... More...
Bond's dirty little spy secret: He's an alcoholic," says Dr. No research team from
Nottingham University Hospitals in England
by Dennis Thompson, Health Day News
Annotated by FM Duck
Dec 14, 2013
the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying
to "expose" that the bigger-than-life character of the James Bond spy novels
was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim, nobody could really
knock off Goldfinger or seduce Pussy Galore if they drank that much alcohol? Really? I suppose their next research task is to prove that Superman can't really fly, or
leap tall buildings in a single bound, or run faster than a locomotive. --
Apparently the Nottingham research team has forgotten what the function of a novel or
movie really is: to provide a means for individuals to experience their
moral philosophy through identification with a bigger-than-life hero who is
knocking off the "bad" -- solving problems -- to bring about "good." Or, do the
researchers have another objective in mind, such as
destroying people's experience of identifying with a bigger-than-life hero
in order to drag them back down to their dreary little lives in state
collectivist Britain and America? -- FM Duck
socialist states hate individualists such as James Bond because they are
seen as threats to the collectivist ideology of the state. It is not
the supposed over-consumption of alcohol that the British socialist
researchers dislike about James Bond; it is his individualistic attitude
that is the basis for their concern because individualism is the basis for
free market capitalism. The last thing the socialist state wants is
for its citizens to be hero-worshipping an individualist. Hence,
especially in a novel or movie that gets distributed to hundreds of millions
of readers and movie-goers, the state propagandists want to prove that James
Bond is just a drunken, impotent, bum. The researchers' real
objective: Worship the state; not the individual. -- FM Duck
England -- Whoa, Holly Goodhead. First, read the following
"research" drivel about your favorite secret agent, James Bond 007,
and then we can look at what the Nottingham University researchers' real
objective is in trying to disparage our favorite spy:
Say the "Dr. No" researchers at Nottingham University
Iconic spy character James Bond drinks so
much and so often that in real life he'd be incapable of chasing down
villains or wooing sexy vamps, a new study contends.
"The level of functioning as
displayed in the books is inconsistent with the physical, mental and indeed
sexual functioning expected from someone drinking this much alcohol," wrote
a team led by Dr. Patrick Davies, of Nottingham University Hospitals, in
His team analyzed the famous
spy's alcohol consumption and found that it was more than four times higher
than the recommended intake for an adult male.
This puts Bond at high risk
for several alcohol-related diseases -- including alcoholic liver disease,
cirrhosis, impotence and alcohol-induced tremor. Because of his heavy
drinking, the real 007 would have a life expectancy of 56, doctors say.
The alcohol-induced tremor
may explain why Bond prefers his martinis "shaken, not stirred," the study
authors joked. They added that the alcoholism-induced tremor in his hands
means he's unlikely to be able to stir his drinks, even if he wants to.
Davies' group launched the
study because they were struck by the fact that the amount of Bond's
drinking in the original books seemed rather high. They wondered if he could
actually carry out his missions and woo so many women at this level of
Based on a thorough reading
of all of the books, the study authors concluded that Bond's average alcohol
consumption was 92 units per week -- over four times the recommended amount.
This figure excludes days when Bond was unable to drink.
A unit of alcohol is about
10 milliliters of pure alcohol -- about the same amount found in the average
glass of scotch, bourbon or other hard liquor.
The spy's maximum daily
alcohol intake was almost 50 units per day and he had only 12.5 alcohol-free
days out of the 87.5 days he was able to drink, according to the findings in
the Christmas edition of the journal BMJ.
Bond might even be a road
hazard, since he frequently drank enough to put him over the legal limit
before he climbed into his car.
Many studies have shown that
people generally underestimate their alcohol consumption by about 30
percent, which means that Bond's alcohol consumption may be as high as 130
units per week, the study authors said.
It's clear that 007 needs
help, the authors said. "We advise an immediate referral for further
assessment and treatment [and] a reduction in alcohol consumption to safe
levels," they concluded.
They also noted that
excessive drinking is a global health problem that causes 2.5 million deaths
a year. However, movies and other sources of entertainment often portray
drinking in a positive, even glamorous, way.
Analysis by FM Duck:
How far has the welfare state of Britain gone when a team of
researchers at Nottingham University Hospitals stooped to the level of
claiming -- after supposedly "a thorough reading" of all the James Bond spy
novels -- that fictional character James Bond consumed 90 drinks of alcohol a week
(that's 13 drinks per day) and thus would be too drunk to perform all of his
007, secret agent, shoot 'em up, Pussy Galore activities for His Majesty's Secret Service?
the purpose of a research team at Nottingham University Hospitals in trying
to "expose" that the bigger-than-life fictional character of the
James Bond spy novels was an incompetent secret agent because, they claim,
Mandela: In His Own Words
by Joseph Farah at WND
Dec 09, 2013
Washington, DC -- As world leaders offer false praise at the funeral of the
supposedly peace-loving former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela,
let's read the following quotes directly from Mandela himself that you will
not read in the international press:
1) “If there is a country that has committed
unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America.
They don’t care for human beings.”
2) “Long live the Cuban revolution. Long live comrade
Fidel Castro … Cuban internationalists have done so much for African
independence, freedom and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban
people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a
vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban
revolution. We too want to control our destiny. … There can be no surrender.
It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of
inspiration to all freedom-loving people.”
3) “[T]he people of Asia and Africa have seen through
the slanderous campaign conducted by the USA against the socialist
countries. They know that their independence is threatened not by any of the
countries in the socialist camp but by the USA, who has surrounded their
continent with military bases. The communist bogey is an American stunt to
distract the attention of the people of Africa from the real issue facing
them, namely, American imperialism.”
4) “Under a Communist Party government, South Africa
will become a land of milk and honey. Political, economic and social rights
will cease to be enjoyed by whites only. They will be shared equally by
whites and non-whites. There will be enough land and houses for all. There
will be no unemployment, starvation and disease. Workers will earn decent
wages; transport will be cheap and education free.”
5) “Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom
fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of
the Palestinian people.”
6) “The cause of communism is the greatest cause in
the history of mankind!”
7) “Those who feel irritated by our friendship with
President Khadafy can go jump in the pool.”
8) “There’s one place where (Fidel Castro’s) Cuba
stands out head and shoulders above the rest – that is in its love...
Mandela: Man of Peace or Terrorist Commie?
Dec 08, 2013
minutes from the 1982 SACP
meeting (South African Communist Party), said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof
[that Nelson Mandela was a member].
'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody
is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he
"Worse yet, the
ends in both cases
(Mandela's and Obama's) are: terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the
are just as bad as the terrorist
Johannesburg, South Africa -- While the world
heaps praises and weeps for the recent passing of Nelson Mandela,
former leader of the revolt against South African apartheid, reporters Colin
Freeman and Jane Flanagan for the British newspaper The Telegraph, reveal
"...research by a
British historian, Professor Stephen Ellis, has unearthed fresh evidence
that during his early years as an activist, Mr. Mandela did hold senior rank
in the South African Communist Party, or SACP. He says Mr. Mandela
joined the SACP to enlist the help of the Communist superpowers for the
ANC's campaign of armed resistance to white rule. His book also
provides fresh detail on how the ANC's military wing had bomb-making lessons
from the IRA, and intelligence training from the East German Stasi, which it
used to carry out brutal interrogations of suspected "spies" at secret
prison camps. The former South African president, who won the Nobel
Peace Prize in 1993, has always denied being a member of the South African
branch of the movement, which mounted an armed campaign of guerrilla
resistance along with the ANC. As evidence of Mr. Mandela's Communist
party membership, Prof Ellis cites minutes from a secret 1982 SACP meeting,
discovered in a collection of private papers at the University of Cape Town,
in which a veteran former party member, the late John Pule Motshabi, talks
about how Mr. Mandela was a party member some two decades before.
the minutes, Mr. Motshabi, is quoted as saying:
'There was an accusation that we opposed allowing Nelson [Mandela] and
Walter (Sisulu, a fellow activist) into the Family (a code word for the
party) ... we were not informed because this was arising after the 1950
campaigns (a series of street protests). The recruitment of the two came
after.' While other SACP members have
previously confirmed Mr. Mandela's party membership, many of their
testimonies were given under duress in police interviews, where they might
have sought to implicate him. However, the minutes from the 1982 SACP
meeting, said Prof Ellis, offered more reliable proof.
'This is written in a closed party meeting so nobody
is trying to impress or mislead the public,'" he
So how are we to judge Nelson Mandela:
a man of peace or a terrorist commie?
fought against racial segregation in South Africa but enlisted the aid of
Soviet Communists and IRA bomb makers to kill innocent people. He associated with the
terrorist organization ANC, the African National Congress -- which was officially listed as
a terrorist group by the US
Government during the Cold War of the1950's and 60's. Both white and
black innocent citizens were bombed, interrogated and tortured to death by
Nelson Mandela's communist party.
It is rather hypocritical to only look at Mr. Mandela's peaceful actions
against apartheid and dismiss the truth of his communist and terrorist
actions, including the killing of thousands of innocent people. This is reminiscent of our own
President Barack Obama's close association with the terrorist group The
Weather Underground whose leaders Bill Ayres and his wife Bernardine Dohrn
were convicted of blowing up an American police station, other sites and
buildings, and killing several
people during their terrorist spree in the 1960's and 1970's.
Weathermen grew out of the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) faction of
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). It took its name from the lyric
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the
wind blows", from the Bob Dylan song
"Subterranean Homesick Blues."
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"
was the title of a position paper they
distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding
document called for a "white fighting force"
to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement"
and other radical movementsto achieve "the destruction of 'US
imperialism' and achieve a classless world: world communism."
Does anybody notice a social-political-economic trend here,
by Nelson Mandela and Barack Obama? Both men's moral philosophy leads
to the horrors of state collectivism.
Nelson Mandela used the terrorism of
his communist party against innocent people -- black and white -- to fight against racial
segregation and implement Marxism. For this, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993. Barack Obama
is using Marxist terrorism in the US today to
fight for a one-world state collectivist government modeled after the
teachings of Karl Marx. For this, Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in
Like Nelson Mandela, Barack's other close associations include state
collectivist activists and terrorists such as Rev. Jeremiah Wright
who screamed, "Not God Bless America... but God damn America," Louis Farrakhan of the fanatical
Nation of Islam, and, more importantly for today, Obama's obvious
supportive association with the Middle East's Muslim Brotherhood which
includes Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other fanatical Muslim groups who are hell bent on a jihad against the
Satan," America, the "Little Satan," Israel, plus all Christians, Jews, Gays, Women,
and everybody else they call "Infidels."
What is the Take Home Lesson
of all of this?
What kind of moral philosophy allows one to play
the role of a terrorist dictator either directly (Nelson Mandela) or indirectly (Barack Obama), be
awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, and pretend that their Marxist ends justify their
means? Answer: State collectivism,
whether it's fascism, socialism, or communism.
Worse yet, the
ends in both cases (Mandela's and
Obama's) are: terror, slavery, and the brutality of state collectivism, and so the
Marxist ends are just as bad as the
Contrast this with the actions of the American Founding Fathers who fought
and I Learned at Columbia: How to Destroy America from Within
by Wayne Allyn root at
The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck
Nov 12, 2013
"America's decline under Obama isn't due to mistake, ignorance, or
incompetence." -- Wayne Allyn Root
the time the Middle Class realizes he's the killer and they're the prey,
they'll already be dead." -- Wayne Allyn Root
NV -- Remember when Geraldo opened Al Capone’s
vault live on national TV? Well I’m about to solve the mystery of Obama. I’m
about to break “the Obama code.” I’m about to tell you everything about the
way Obama, and the people around him, really think. I’m about to rip open
the true Obama plan to destroy our country. Because I was there when the
plan was hatched.
How do I know all this? Because I was Barack Obama’s
college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. I was easy to
recognize – the lone outspoken conservative in a class of 700 students. I
knew I was in trouble when my first political science class at Columbia was
“Communism 101″ taught by Professor Trotsky in the Fidel Castro Building, at
the corner of Marx Blvd. and Lenin Drive.
I’m only half-kidding. My experiences at Columbia were
not far off. [Note: same for FM Duck, the
Lone Libertarian, who attended a similar experience at UC Berkeley in the
Everyone needs to hear my story because what Obama and I
learned at Columbia explains EXACTLY what Obama is doing to America today.
The economy in deep decline; the disappearance of jobs;
the annihilation of the middle class; the demonization of business owners;
the destruction of small business with onerous regulations and taxes; the
overwhelming debt and spending of out-of-control government; the millions of
Americans losing their health insurance; and the unimaginable increase in
dependency through welfare, food stamps, unemployment, disability, and now
free health care.
It’s all easily explained when you hear what Obama and I
learned at Columbia.
America’s decline under Obama isn’t due to mistake,
ignorance, or incompetence at the hands of a community organizer. It’s a
purposeful, brilliant plan hatched at Columbia University to... More...
Cover Up -- Why Obama Really Wants to go to War in Syria
by Wayne Allyn root at
The Blaze, annotated by FM Duck
Sep 13, 2013
NV -- Let’s take an honest look at what Obama is
doing to black Americans and his own most loyal supporters. It is, in a
It all starts with Syria. Why Syria? Why now? Until
Russia interceded, going to war in Syria seemed the most important thing in
the world to Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry. They seemed
DESPERATE to go to war, at any costs.
But why? Syria has nothing to do with us. They are not
threatening us. Their own war is a civil war with no “good guys.” How does
America benefit from a war with Syria? Why did Obama suddenly decide a “red
line” has been crossed, when there are “red lines” all over the world-
including the killing of Christians and the burning of 71 Christian churches
in Egypt. Why is it so important to risk American lives to defend the Syrian
rebels- who are partners with Al Qaeda, America’s sworn enemy? We didn’t go
to war to avenge the murder of our own citizens at Benghazi, so why would we
go to war to avenge Al Qaeda deaths in Syria? None of this makes any sense
Until you realize it’s a massive cover-up. Obama’s WMD-
Weapon of Mass Distraction. Obama is desperate to cover-up the facts about
his dying economy and the damage he’s done to his own most loyal voters.
Obama has destroyed the lives of the very people who consider him “the
American Idol.”How bad is Obama’s economy? Forget the 7.3 percent
unemployment rate that is reported by the government. That’s pure fraud and
propaganda. That figure goes down only because hundreds of thousands of
Americans drop out of the workforce. In other words, if you stop looking for
work, and go on food stamps and welfare, Obama says the unemployment number
just got better!
The only truth about unemployment is found in the Labor
Force Participation Rate of 63 percent. That’s the lowest in four decades.
For men it’s the lowest since record-keeping began in the 1940’s. What this
means is 37 percent of the able-bodied, working age adults in America are
not only not working, they’ve given up looking for work.
Even worse, a unimaginable percentage of those who are
employed have only part-time jobs. Seventy-seven percent of the new jobs
created since January 1st are part-time jobs. That’s not good folks.
Studies show 1-in-4 part-time workers live in poverty, while only 1-in-20
full-time workers live in poverty. So millions of Americans under Obama who
show up as “employed” are merely working their way towards poverty. And
millions of others who have full-time jobs are working at McDonalds, or
working as waiters, or bartenders, or janitors. Those are the only jobs left
under Obama. The middle class is being slaughtered.
Here are the two most ironic points about this
slow-motion train wreck called the Obama economy: More...
Purposely Trying to Start WW III?
by Wayne Allyn root,
annotated by FM Duck
Aug 29, 2013
Las Vegas, NV -- Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for
Personal Liberty. Two things are happening right now under President
Barack Obama that are unprecedented.
First, Obama is about to go
to war in Syria and risk your sons’ and daughters’ lives on behalf of our
enemy, al-Qaida. Second, he is about to risk starting World War III.
Are you on board?
And then there’s Obama’s
“red line.” Obama’s defenders say, “Syria passed the red line. We have no
choice.” Really? So we now call extremist Muslims killing other extremist
Muslims a “red line” that demands U.S. intervention. But extremist Muslims
in Egypt burning more than 70 churches to the ground and killing Christians
is not a “red line?” In one place (Syria), we want to go to war. In the
other (Egypt), we continue to send billions of dollars in foreign aid as a
reward for killing Christians.
Do you support Obama’s
definition of a “red line?” I know I don’t.
So why the rush to war?
Could it be because America’s unemployment problem under Obama is unfixable?
Ninety million working-age Americans are not working. The labor force
participation rate is the lowest for men since 1947 (since measurement
began). Obama has no way out.
The same holds true for our
partners in the European Union like the United Kingdom and France.
Unemployment for the EU region is 12.1 percent, the worst in history. Almost
20 million Europeans are unemployed. Youth unemployment in the EU is just
below 25 percent.
How do you solve such a
human psychological disaster? You go to war.
Suddenly, young people with no job prospects have a job — in the military.
They have a check, a place to live, something to do. They no longer have
time to commit crimes or riot in the streets.
America got out of the last
Great Depression with the help of World War II. How convenient that Obama
lit the fuse for the Arab Spring, helped to topple dictators friendly to
U.S. interests and took the side of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now, it’s all
coming home to roost.
We fomented instability,
supported the radicals who hate America and Israel, and... More...
Illegally Changes ACA, Like Nixon
by George Will,
annotated by FM Duck
Aug 18, 2013
Washington, DC -- Barack
Obama's increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely
proportional to his shriveling presidency.
Desperation fuels arrogance as, barely 200 days into the 1,462 days of his
second term, his pantry of excuses for failure is bare, his domestic agenda
is nonexistent and his foreign policy of empty rhetorical deadlines and
redlines is floundering. And at last week's news conference he offered
as a justification for
his decision to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act, he said: "I
didn't simply choose to" ignore the statutory requirement for beginning in
2014 the employer mandate to provide employees with healthcare. No, "this
was in consultation with businesses." [FM
Duck Note: Really? Businesses? Which businesses qualify to
help justify Obama's breaking of the law? Can Obama change any
provisions or paragraphs of any ol' law he feels like? From where does
he obtain this authority to trash the checks and balances between the three
branches of government. Certainly not from his contract with the
American people, namely the US Constitution.]
continued: "In a normal political environment, it would have been easier for
me to simply call up the speaker and say, you know what, this is a tweak
that doesn't go to the essence of the law . . . it looks like there may be
some better ways to do this, let's make a technical change to the law. That
would be the normal thing that I would prefer to do. But we're not in a
normal atmosphere around here when it comes to Obamacare. We did have the
executive authority to do so, and we did so."
props in the scripted charade of White House news conferences, journalists
did not ask the pertinent question: ... More...
Hit the Road
Barack, I Too Have Become Disillusioned
by Matt Patterson,
Newsweek, annotated by FM Duck
(Written Aug 22, 2012,
that's right, 2012, not today: July 17, 2013)
Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek unload on Obama. As many
of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact
that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the
one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event,
and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President
and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built
around him by the liberal media.
"Not one original idea has ever issued
from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed
over and over again for 100 years," says left Liberal Matt Patterson of
Newsweek. Wow, even the Liberals have now figured it out.
-- FM Duck
Unfortunately, it is now 2013 and President Barack Obama has
been re-elected for another 4 years. If Obama is not the Pied Piper of
America, leading America's youth down the path to serfdom, I don't know who
So much for even the left Liberal news rag Newsweek's influence on the
typical American voter.--
Washington, DC -- Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of
Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a
baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the
Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional
accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's
largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the
world's most consequential job? [FM Duck
Note: From a Libertarian point of view, it is not the President's
function to try to "manage" the economy. That's socialism. It
is, however, the President's job to work with Congress to dump all the state
collectivist legislation that has piled up over the last umpteen hundred
years and get back to a limited government, free market economy. Obama
has, in fact, worsened this problem as he has intervened more into the
market -- thus into individuals' rights and freedoms -- than any other
American President except perhaps FDR and Woodrow Wilson.]
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered
into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores
along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as
a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly
devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present"); and finally an
unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of
which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as
a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations:
the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as
Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as
Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future
historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected
president? [FM Duck
Note: Easy peezy, lemon squeazy: as Ayn Ran would have said, he
obtained the sanction of his altruistic state collectivist victims.]
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed
the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white
candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like
Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have
lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled
in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various
American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard -
because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter
when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said)
"non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the
first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But
certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and
regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and
especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are
not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor
performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if
these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the
emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist
policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a
separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's
affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. [FM Duck
Note: Because that is exactly what American "intellectuals" have
taught Americans to do to themselves.]
True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why
would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for
Columbia [if he really
attended Columbia since nobody there, from students to professors, remember
despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough
for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was
good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his
life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next
step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every
time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive
qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect,
Idea: Spending $7 Billion of our Tax Money on Electric Soccer Balls
by Chicks on The Right,
annotated by FM Duck
(July 02, 2013)
This week, Obama's decided to take $7 Billion
of our hard-earned money and give it to Africa -- in the form of electric
to start by investing $7 billion in
U.S. government resources. ...that's what opportunity looks like."
-- Barack Obama
"No, that's what state
collectivism, socialism, and robbery of the American people looks like." --
He's one innovative dude.
Obama's decided to take $7 Billion of our hard-earned money and give it to
Africa- in the form of electric soccer balls. They're called "socket balls,"
specifically, and they were created by two chicks at Harvard (natch). And
Dear Leader plans on powering Africa with these soccer balls that carry
electric generators inside of them. No lie. Basically, as kids kick them
around all day long, "it
generates electricity and stores it in a battery." And then those kids can
go home and plug something into the ball, like a
phone or a lamp or a hair dryer, or
From the White
House transcript of Obama's speech
proud to announce a new initiative. We’ve been dealing with agriculture,
we’ve been dealing with health. Now we’re going to talk about power -- Power
Africa -- a new initiative that will... More...
Document Examiner Tied To Obama Defense Attorney Says Birth Certificate is
by Tim Brown at Freedom
(Jun 09, 2013)
“The answer is, because I am very close to proving Obama to be a criminal,
who absolutely has to be removed from the White House and send (sic) to
prison.” -- Attorney Orly Taitz
Reed Hayes is a court qualified handwriting and
document examiner whose business is located in Honolulu, Hawaii. He has
nearly 40 years of handwriting related experience, and has worked as an
international consultant and speaker. Never heard of him? Well, Hayes is the
Certified Document Examiner (CDE) who produced the 40 page opinion
referenced in the Mike Zullo affidavit that was submitted to the Alabama
Supreme Court in the Obama eligibility case and his report concluded that
the Obama birth certificate image, located at WhiteHouse.gov is a complete
The rabid followers of the “O” (Obots) have
rushed to denounce Reed Hayes as a “quack.” However, one might be
surprised to learn that one of Hayes’ clients listed in the Expert Witness
Directory at this link is an attorney with Perkins-Coie Law Firm.
Perkins – Coie is the law practice whose
partners have provided Obama’s personal defense against all birth
certificate and natural born citizen litigation over the past five years.
Hmmmmm. Very interesting indeed.
If it turns out that Sheriff Arpaio is
successful in getting Congress to investigate the authenticity of Obama’s
BC, the Perkins-Coie legal team, who will be defending Obama, will
be hard pressed to simply dismiss Reed Hayes as a “quack.” This
fact will be especially significant now that it is a revealed and proven
truth that members of the Perkins – Coie firm have used Hayes as an expert
witness! Their own prior cases, where Hayes was used as a witness,
would be severely compromised if they use Saul Alinski-styled mocking
attacks on Hayes.
It has been reported that Mr. Hayes has been
hounded by Obama operatives to discover the details of his 40-page forensic
analysis of the Obama pdf birth certificate. He has been referring them to
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse, who now legally own his report,
for further information.
I also found it interesting that someone sided
with the Obama administration and attempted to bring up dirt on Hayes by
pointing out... More...
The Ghost of Columbia University... and then some
by Wayne Allyn Root
(Jun 07, 2013)
Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative
Republican. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee.
There is something more than
just "rotten" in all of the "information" -- or lack thereof -- about Barack
Obama coming out of nowhere, studying nowhere, and becoming President of the
United States. The bigger question is:
or what group,
has created this "Nowhere Man" -- as the Beatles' song indicates -- who
knows nothing, came from nowhere, but seems to be carrying out
One may claim that that would smack of claiming a "conspiracy theory"
against the American people. But let's remember the dictionary
definition of the term "conspiracy:" From the word "conspire,"
to agree together, esp.
secretly, to do something wrong, evil, or illegal... to act or work together
toward the same goal... to plot together toward the same evil or illegal
goal. And thus the
definition of the term
"conspiracy:" the act of conspiring... an evil, unlawful, treacherous,
or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; a plot.
Conspiracies have occurred all throughout history. Conspiracies occur
every day in business, politics, and everywhere. It is only Liberal
politicians who have recently tried to redefine the term "conspiracy" to
mean "untruth" in order to answer unanswerable questions (by them) in a
debate or discussion. That doesn't make real conspiracies not true.
It just means that Liberal politicians don't have -- or are part of the
"conspiracy" themselves -- answers to the conspiracy that is being
discussed. Until a conspiracy is proven to be true, it is just a
theory, a conspiracy theory. But after it is proven to be true, it
still remains as a real conspiracy that occurred. The upshot question
is: are we in the middle of a conspiracy theory with somebody, or
group, playing President Obama like a puppet for some nefarious reasons?
Something truly smells more "rotten" than just Obama's non-attendance at
Columbia University and its cover up. Add to that the fact that
Obama's birth certificate appears to be bogus, too, and that he is guiding
the US into a social-political-economic debacle that will bankrupt the
American and global economy from which known groups (i.e. central bankers,
the military industrial complex, and other groups in Obama's pocket) stand
to rake in billions of dollars, and it is not far-fetched to claim that a
real conspiracy between these groups does indeed exist. -- FM Duck
Other conspiracies have existed
in US history, too. The first Moon landing in 1969 was allegedly
hoaxed by the JFK administration so we could beat the Soviets to a moon
landing as we promised the American public. All subsequent landings,
however -- according to reliable sources -- were true and did occur as
reported. When JFK was contemplating issuing an Executive Order to
stop the Federal Reserve from printing Fed Reserve Notes and going back to
using gold and silver backed currency, he was mysteriously executed in
Dallas and this was blamed on a Lee Harvey Oswald who was then mysteriously
shot by a man who just walked in with the news media while Oswald was being
escorted to jail. How convenient and lax security at the sheriff's
office. Vice President Lynden Johnson then took over and continued the
bankers' war in Vietnam and Federal Reserve Notes continued to be printed.
To this day, we have had nothing but perpetual boogie men set up as
"terrorists" or "bad guys" for the US public to fear so the central bankers
and OPEC oil ministers can continue with their Petro Dollar Deal in the
Mid-East. President Barack Obama may stupidly believe in the Marxist
fairytales he proposes and is trying to implement through programs such as a
national health care joke but he nevertheless did not get to become and
remain as President of the United States without a little help from
a group that is acting or
working together toward an evil, unlawful, treacherous and surreptitious
plan formulated in secret by two or more persons.
Namely, it's a freaking
plot. And now that
he's used the IRS to target his "enemies" -- conservatives, Tea Party
activists, and AP news journalists -- he is gathering all of your private
phone and email communications to use -- not for "national security" -- but
rather against YOU in the near future. Look who he just appointed as
Director for the National Security Agency: former UN Ambassador Susan
Rice who ran around to all the major TV talk shows to lie about an
anti-Allah video produced by some Bozo in Hollywood as the reason for the
terrorist murders of four Americans, including our Ambassador, at our
Benghazi Consulate. Just when we were about to learn that Obama and
Sec of State Hillary Clinton were running guns and missiles to Al Queda by
mistake and were trying to buy them back. Wow. Just a
coincidence? Not part of a bigger conspiracy that Obama is involved
in? Yeah, right... And I got a Golden Gate Bridge you can buy in
San Francisco for five bucks... Uh huh... -- FM Duck
So, let's look at the bigger
picture vis a vis the probable existence of a huge "conspiracy theory" -- a
real one, not the fake definition of "conspiracy theory" by the left
Liberals -- while reading the following from alumnus Wayne Allyn Root, a
former Columbia University classmate of President Barack Obama -- that is,
if Obama actually did attend Columbia University. (Cough-cough, not
likely.) -- FM Duck
I (Wayne Allyn Root) just returned from New York, where I attended my 30th
Columbia University reunion. I celebrated with my esteemed classmates.
Everyone except Barack Obama. As usual - he wasn’t there. Not even a video
greeting. Not a personalized letter to his classmates. Nothing. But worse,
no one at our 30th reunion ever met him. The President of the United States
is the ghost of Columbia University.
I’m certainly no “Johnny
come lately.” For five years now (since 2007 when it became clear Barack
Obama was running for President), I’ve been quoted in the media as saying
that no one I’ve ever met at Columbia can remember ever meeting, or even
seeing, our college classmate Barack Obama. Don’t you think the media should
be asking... More...
Employee: D.C. Told Us to Target Tea Party
by Kerry Picket at
(Jun 02, 2013)
IRS Director met with Somebody at the White House 157
times in one year. Remember, one does not just show up to the White
House unannounced for 157 Easter Egg Hunts. The White House INVITES
you to show up, you don't just show up on your own. So the Big
Question is: WHO at the White House INVITED the IRS Director to show
up and for what purpose? It wasn't some junior staff member who felt
like babbling to the IRS Director just for fun. The only plausible
answer is that it was either the Head Honcho himself, Barack Obama, or a
group created by him, in order to make plans on how to target Tea Party and
other Conservative groups RE denying them tax exemptions while readily
granting such exemptions to Democratic groups, AND, to make plans on how to
use the IRS to confiscate AP journalists' personal and professional
communications in a witch hunt allegedly for "National Security" ha ha
"National Security" purposes. And US AG Eric Holder was up to his
eyebrows in this type of targeted behavior. -- FM duck
And the IRS is THE BUREAUCRACY scheduled to enforce
Obamacare? Are we crazy? That's like Adolph Hitler using the
Brown Shirts to enforce national health care in The Third Reich. Oh
well... I guess he did; Welcome to Obamacare in the Third Reich. --
-- House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) revealed new testimony from IRS employees on
CNN's State of The Union on Sunday. According to transcribed
excerpts released by the Committee, a Cincinnati IRS employee made it clear
they were told by Washington, D.C. personnel to give extra scrutiny to Tea
early 2010, was there a time when you became aware of applications that
referenced Tea Party or other conservative groups?
March of 2010, I was made aware.
Okay. Now, was there a point around this time period when [your
supervisor] asked you to do a search for similar applications?
the best of your recollection, when was this request made?
Sometime in early March of 2010.
[your supervisor] give you any indication of the need for the search, any
told me that Washington, D.C., wanted some cases.
as of April 2010, these 40 cases were held at that moment in your group;
is that right?
many were held there?
Less than 40. Some went to Washington, D.C.
Okay. How many went to Washington, D.C.?
you prepared seven hard copy versions of the applications to go to
he give you any sort of indication as to why he requested you to do that?
said Washington, D.C. wanted seven. Because at one point I believe I heard
they were thinking 10, but it came down to seven. I said okay, seven.
did you decide which seven were sent?
Just the first seven.
first seven to come into the system?
anyone else ever make a request that you send any cases to Washington?
[Different IRS employee] wanted to have two cases that she couldn't --
Washington, D.C. wanted them, but she couldn't find the paper. So she
requested me, through an email, to find these cases for her and to send
them to Washington, D.C.
When was this, what time frame?
don't recall the time frame, maybe May of 2010.
just to be clear, she told you the specific names of these applicants.
she told you that Washington, D.C. had requested these two specific
applications be sent to D.C.
Yes, or parts of them.
Okay. So she asked you to send particular parts of these applications.
that was unusual. Did you say that?
she indicated that Washington had requested these specific parts of these
specific applications; is that right? More...
IRS -- and the Income Tax with It
by Sheldon Richman at
Project to Restore America (Annotations by FM Duck)
(May 29, 2013)
[Note by FM Duck: It was not
coincidental that the Internal Revenue Service was created circa 1913-14,
the same time that the Federal Reserve system was created. The same
individuals who concocted our national central bank, The Federal Reserve,
wanted to create an enforcement agency in the government to make sure they
could enforce repayment of all future annual national debts/deficits that
the central bank planned on creating. That enforcement agency was the
IRS and the bankers who created the IRS gave it -- or at least provided for
it to easily obtain in the future -- powers far in excess of what the US
Constitution allowed. The Federal Reserve is not just a friendly bank
that exists to provide a wonderful financial system for the US. It is
a private consortium of the major bankers in the US who have illegally
tricked the dummies in Congress into providing a method by which the bankers
can rob the people of their monetary value while giving Congress the ability
to spend as much deficit money as they want as a method to obtain votes.
The root of all the financial problems in the US, plus the financing of many
wars around the globe, can be directly traced to the existence of our
central bank AND the European Central Bank (ECB). The Petro Dollar
Deal between the Federal Reserve and the OPEC oil ministers is the direct
cause of most of the unrest and the perpetual wars in the Middle East and it
would not be stretching the truth to claim that the current jihad terrorism
is directly related the the actions of the world's central banks. Both
Republicans and Democrats are responsible for allowing the Federal Reserve
AND its enforcement agency, the IRS, to perform all the dirty deeds that
have occurred over the last 100 years of both agencies' existence. The
fact that President Obama and his administration is now caught up in the
same type of IRS harassment issues that many former presidents have used the
IRS for should not come as a surprise to anybody. Nobody at the IRS
needs to be fired or sent to jail. Rather, both agencies -- the IRS
and the Federal Reserve -- need to be abolished. There are better ways
to fund what little the US government should be spending tax money on and we
absolutely do not need the IRS to become part of a national socialist health
care system, that's for damn sure.]
-- The Internal Revenue Service has been caught
engaging in political profiling while processing applications for tax-exempt
status. In this case it was against organizations with "tea-party" or
"patriot " in their names and other right-wing groups. Next time it could be
libertarian or left-wing antiwar and pro-civil-liberties groups. No
dissenter can ever rest assured he is safe from the arbitrary power of the
Nothing will have been learned from this scandal if all that happens is the
firing of some IRS administrators and the issuance of new guidelines on
501(c)(4) applications. That is not nearly enough.
Obviously, tax exemptions exist only because individuals and some
organizations are subject to income and other forms of taxation. Congress
levies a tax on incomes, then in its "wisdom" chooses to exempt certain
activities but not others. This is social engineering, with Congress seeking
to encourage some kinds of organizations — while not forgoing more revenue
than necessary. The IRS then writes rules to carry out the directions of
Where possible, people will naturally strive to qualify
for exemption by pushing the boundaries... More...
Whistleblowers: Stevens Was Involved in Buyback of Stinger Missiles from Al
by Tim Brown at Freedom
Outpost (Summary annotation by FM tl)
(May 23, 2013)
President Obama and Sec
of State Hillary Clinton were, according to new whistleblower sources,
running an international 'Fast and Furious' gun trade with (unwittingly,
e.g. just like what happened with the drug lords in Mexico) Al Qaeda
promised Sec of State Hillary Clinton that he would help her buy back
Stinger Missiles from insurgents after Hillary and Obama discovered the
insurgents to whom they sold the missiles were not freedom fighters but
rather Al Qaeda jihadists. Stevens promised to make the Benghazi
outpost "permanent" vs. "temporary" but was knocked off by the same Al Qaeda
terrorists from whom he, Obama, and Hillary were attempting to recoup the
While this mess was a
State Dept mess, President Obama was the only one who could tell the
military to "stand down" and not send troops to Benghazi to save Ambassador
Stevens. Hillary played along with this game.
General Carter Ham, in
command of US Africa Command (AFRICOM) was ordered not to act to save
Ambassador Stevens. That order, according to CIA Director General
David Patraeus, must come from President Barack Obama, as Commander in
Chief. Patraeus knew the Benghazi raid was done by terrorists and said
so, but to shut him up the Obama Administration spilled the beans about
Patraeus' adulterous relationship with his biographer Paula Broadwell.
In order to cover all
this crap up, President Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton concocted the
Terrorist Fake Movie Fairytale and sent storyteller UN Ambassador Susan Rice
to all the Sunday morning TV talk shows to spread this lie, which has since
been uncovered and revealed on all national news media outlets.
Meanwhile, some poor
Hollywood schmuck "movie producer" sits rotting in jail after being arrested
by the Obama Administration on bogus charges of initiating the Benghazi raid
on our consulate with a YouTube video bashing Allah. And poor little
Hillary hugged the wives of the dead consulate workers while blaming it all
on the "movie." Plus, poor bedraggled Hillary screamed to the
Congressional Investigative Panel words to the effect, "Who gives a crap
what really happened at this point, since they're all dead!"
Guess what, Hilly?
We do. And you just lied to Congress, bitch.
More Benghazi whistleblowers are coming forward according to two former U.S.
diplomats. According to the former diplomats, these whistleblowers are
obtaining legal counsel because they are not protected by whistleblower laws
in the areas that they work in.
reporting of an interview with these diplomats:
diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what
Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put
on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and
therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S.
mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from
al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such
a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had
opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents”
with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats
said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when
it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in
the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the
Could Have Ordered 'Stand Down Call' On Benghazi
by AWR Hawkins at
(May 09, 2013)
-- A source with intimate information
about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S.
Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News
that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting
on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground
or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.
According to the source,
when the attack on the Consulate occurred, a specific chain of command to
gain verbal permission to move special-forces in must have occurred.
SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant Col. Gibson would have contacted...
'Martial Law' Alarms Forensic Profiler
by Bob Unruh
(Mar 25, 2013)
-- A forensic profiler who worked on the
disappearance of Natalie Holloway and the double-murder case against O.J.
Simpson says he is becoming alarmed by some of the references President
Obama is using.
Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who
wrote "The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret
fury," previously said Obama's statement "I am not a dictator"
actualy meant, "I am the dictator president."
Hodges also concluded Obama
unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.
On Hodges's website, Steven
A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston,
Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge
of forensic science.”
“Dr. Hodges’ investigation
of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his
‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact,
becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal
investigators,” wrote Egger.
Hodges is not new to the
field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails,
letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded
Simpson’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder.
He deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in Boulder, Colo., to identify
the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was
about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by
Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of
Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her
daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill
Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
In his newest analysis, he
looks further into Obama’s statements in his press conference about the
sequester issue in which he berated Republicans for not doing what he wants.
Hodges said “another
spontaneous image” appeared from Obama’s “super intelligence.”
“Asked whether he couldn’t
have pushed negotiations until a deal was reached, Obama replied, ‘I can’t
have Secret Service block the doorway,’” Hodges explained
“He suggests the secret wish
to block the Republicans from the door to the government. Failing to
negotiate, he has made every effort to demonize/crush Republicans to gain
total control of the government after the 2014 election. His ‘have Secret
Service’ image further suggests a desire to totally control major government
law enforcement agencies– to block any opposition,” Hodges said.
“The frightening image ‘of
blocking the doorway’ to those who oppose him suggests progressively ideas
of imprisonment/forced containment, and a picture of martial law. Extreme?
Likely so for now but equally a potential major warning of his true intent –
if everything fell into place,” he said.
But Hodges noted objective
actions that fit the pattern, such as the government’s purchase of 1.6
billion rounds of ammunition, the estimated 145,000 federal agents with
firearm- carry authority and the 65,000 agents for the Department of
Homeland Security alone.
Then, he said, there’s the
report that a Minnesota company was selling to the federal government cutout
targets “designed to ‘desensitize police’ to ‘nontraditional threat
The targets included
pregnant women, children, older people and other civilians in neighborhood
settings – all holding guns. The company reported law enforcement designed
and ordered the targets.
“In your wildest
imagination, who in law enforcement needs desensitization to such targets?
Hodges noted that even
activists on the left have expressed concern. Medea Benjamin, co-founder of
the left-wing Code Pink, in a recent WABC radio interview with host Aaron
Klein, called the potential abuse by the Obama administration’s huge
domestic police power “extremely troubling.”
“Recall Obama’s earlier
words which, importantly, he made spontaneously, strongly pointing toward an
unconscious confession. ‘We’ve got to have a civilian national security
force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the
Congress Must Reach Deal On budget By March 1, And Then April 1, And Then
April 20, And Then April 28, And then May 1
And Then Twice A Week For
Next Four Years
by The Onion
(Mar 11, 2013)
-- With the dramatic, across-the-board
sequestration scheduled to occur this week, the nation’s leading economists
have warned that President Obama and Congress must come to a compromise on
the budget by Mar. 1, and then again by Apr. 1, and then Apr. 20, Apr. 28,
and—after Congress is once again unable to come to a comprehensive agreement
to fully stabilize the economy—May 1, along with agreements twice a week,
every week, for the next four years.
Experts say that without
reaching a deal this Friday, the automatic $85 billion reduction in
government spending will immediately slow the U.S. economy and impact
thousands of middle-class citizens. Officials said the same exact thing will
happen next month, the month after that, and the month after that if Obama
and Congress fail to meet deadlines created by the preceding, incomplete
“If the president and
Congress are unable to reach a grand bargain by Mar. 1, what they will
likely do is reach a set of 100 or so smaller bargains, all with their own
deadlines, and all of which could potentially plunge the U.S. economy into a
recession,” said Princeton economics professor Marshall Kahn. “So, the Mar.
1 deadline is absolutely crucial. Just like the one next month will be. And
the 12 deadlines in May. And the bi-daily deadlines that will kick in during
“Based on the way the
president and Congress deal with one another,” Kahn added, “in 2014, there
will need to be 4,562 budget deals.”
According to leading
economists, should negotiations between Obama and lawmakers stall this week,
Congress could vote on a resolution to extend the current deadline to May 1,
which would likely cause vital cuts to public programs, and also combine the
projected negotiations scheduled for May 30, June 4, June 5, July 8, 2014,
and Mar. 12, 2042 into one seven-day-long meeting.
Other experts noted that
even in the event of a deal, a clause in the Budget Control Act would
inevitably lead to a total of 64 additional meetings between June and July,
as well as a potential deadline creation deadline that would automatically
kick in on Oct. 4 and would create 20 more deadlines that... More...
The Sequester 'Crisis' and What
Should Be Done
by former US Rep Ron
(Mar 06, 2013)
-- Despite what the media and politicians would
have us believe, the United States did not collapse last Friday when the
package of spending reductions known as “sequestration” went into effect.
The financial markets hardly blinked, as they have come to be more skeptical
about these periodic government-hyped “crises.”
What had been portrayed as a
drastic reduction in government spending was merely a decrease in the
projected rate of increase in government spending over the next decade.
Under sequestration, government spending increases by $2.4 trillion over the
next 10 years rather than $2.5 trillion without it.
So we are speeding toward
collapse at only 100 miles per hour instead of 110 miles per hour.
Some in Congress are using
the panic over sequestration to justify another surrender of legislative
authority to the executive branch. These members want to “pass the buck” on
prioritizing federal programs by giving the president, cabinet officials,
and high-level bureaucrats authority to set spending priorities. However, it
is Congress’s job to set priorities in federal spending.
The drafters of the
Constitution give the legislature the authority over spending because they
recognized it was a threat to liberty to allow this power to be concentrated
in the executive branch. Congress’s willingness to cede more authority to
the executive should be opposed by everyone who values liberty and limited
Some of the loudest
objections to sequestration have come from the champions of the
military-industrial complex. Yet under sequestration defense spending will
still increase by 18 percent over 10 years as opposed to 20 percent without
There are claims that the
military will face a... More...
Balances On a Sea of Debt
Mar 06, 2010
“The banks that control the world’s supply of money are no better than
counterfeiters – and their systems of juggling debt have left the global
economy teetering on the brink of ruin.”--
Darius Guppy, convicted Dutch counterfeiter
The following article aptly describes how fractional reserve banking is
simply another form of counterfeiting, pointing out the conceptual
difference between (1) real money and (2) a paper receipt for real money.
Then as the counterfeiting by fractional reserve bankers grows
exponentially, as it must, the central bankers – witness former Federal
Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan as he embraces the erroneous concept that he
can impute value to paper money per se -- start believing in their own
monetary lies and create even more complicated counterfeit investment
vehicles backed by nothing but hot air, such as fake mortgage-backed
securities, collateralized debt obligations based upon non-collateralized
future daydreams, and then gambling pieces of paper called Credit Default
Swaps whose clever function consists of betting against the
previously-created fractional reserve derivatives. That’s like a
counterfeiter soliciting bets that the cops will soon catch him at his
counterfeiting activities, in order to mitigate his losses. So, the
investment bankers at Goldman Sachs who sit on the board of Governors of the
Fed Reserve sell fractional reserve hedge fund derivatives to clients while
down the hall they short their clients’ very same hedge funds with Credit
Default Swaps, betting that their hedge funds will fail. That’s worse than
prostitutes who only make their money going in; the bankers make their money
both going in and pulling it , continues until they can’t keep it up any longer and the market crashes and
burns. Not to worry. It’s called a Recession, then a Depression
as everybody points fingers at everybody else and the bankers blame it on a
“systemic risk,” or the U.S. Congress who is also participating in this
monetary gang bang, or the vagaries of a non-existent free market capitalism,
or a mysterious virus from Mars.
– FM Duck
“If I could counterfeit the Pink Slip to my ’57 Chevy and sell a million
copies to the suckers in my neighborhood for $1,000 each, while replacing
’This is to Certify that There Exists One ’57 Chevy on Deposit at FM Duck’s
Warehouse Payable to the Bearer of This Note on Demand’
’Virtual Non-Existent Car,’I could make a fortune. And that’s exactly what the Federal Reserve is
doing with fractional reserve banking of the U.S. Dollar and going off the
gold standard.” – FM Duck
Europe – In 1994, there resided in the cell next to mine a certain “Tommy”.
He had been imprisoned for counterfeiting Dutch Guilders to such a high
standard that he had fooled the banks themselves.
customary among prisoners who became friends, Tommy allowed me to read his
legal papers and I became fascinated by the judge’s sentencing speech, the
gist of which was that his activities had been parasitical. By creating
money out of thin air he had reduced the purchasing power of more deserving
members of society. What would happen if everyone behaved like him?
of arguments used, in a different context, regarding inflation. Like
counterfeiting, it dilutes the value of the community’s wealth and
constitutes a social evil. Creating too much money – “real” or “fake” – can
wreck an economy. Such was the Nazis’ reasoning when they planned to ruin
Britain’s economy by flooding the country with near-perfect counterfeit
A lot of
nonsense has been written about the world’s current economic woes – about
how the crash is the fault solely of the banks and, by implication,
governments are blameless; and how it could all have been avoided, and can
be put right, by greater financial regulation.
It is a
classic example of what the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre terms “the
fallacy of managerial expertise”: an attempt by “experts” to blind us with
science to justify their overpaid existences and mask their confusion. After
all, not one of them was able to predict the current debacle.
“experts” will tell you that the present difficulties are simply the result
of abuses and excesses in a system that is basically sound. All that is
required is for some faults to be corrected. Do not believe them. The
reality is that the problem is systemic and a little tinkering here or there
will achieve nothing in the long term.
needed is a root-and-branch re‑evaluation of that most curious of cultural
inventions, money: how it is created, how it circulates, and how it can best
be used to serve the interests of the community.
the experts must explain in the simplest terms how money actually works.
Were one to ask the man on the street – or, indeed, most politicians and
bankers – who creates the money that rules our lives they would reply “the
State”. They would be wrong. It is true that governments create legal tender
– the physical notes and coins that circulate in an economy – but that
represents, at its highest, only 3 per cent of the total money in
circulation in the global economy. It is the commercial banks, largely
unaccountable and privately owned, that create the world’s money.
even if Tommy were responsible for printing every note in circulation
throughout the world his power to dilute the rest of our wealth would amount
to only a tiny fraction of that of the real manufacturers of money. His
activities and the activities of the bankers are, in essence, identical: the
creation of money out of nothing.
knowing it, therefore, Tommy’s judge punished him for usurping not so much
the role of the State as the role of the banks. The same mistake – the mis-identification
of where money truly originates – has been made by virtually all of our
politicians, economists and financial commentators.
the contradiction at the heart of neo-liberal, monetarist economics that has
constituted the Western orthodoxy for the past few decades: to emphasize on
the one hand that the money supply should be brought under control while
simultaneously allowing banking – where the money is actually manufactured –
to run riot.
how the global fraud works we need to step back in time and imagine
ourselves next to the original goldsmith-banker.
vault, 10 of his customers each deposit a bar of gold... More...
2nd Inaugural Address; Obama
Declares War on Liberty as We Know It
by Joel B. Pollak,
(Jan 21, 2013)
"But we have
always understood that when times change, so must we; that
fidelity to our founding principles requires new
responses to new challenges; that
preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action."
-- President Barack Obama
Notice that Barack Obama doesn't
understand -- or doesn't want YOU to understand -- that PRINCIPLES, by
definition, do not change over time. That's why they're called
principles, like the Law of Identity, the Law of Cause and Effect, Do Unto
Others, the 10 Commandments, the laws of physics, etc. And namely, the
US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Therefore, preserving our
individual freedoms DOES NOT REQUIRE a change to "collective action" --
which is Obama's Marxist code word for state collectivism, better known as
Sounding the same themes of class warfare that propelled his re-election
campaign, President Barack Obama devoted his second inaugural address to
laying out his second term agenda: a struggle to undo the seeming injustices
of America's past, and to overcome the army of
straw men (Obama's and Karl Marx's continual fiction) that stand
in opposition to progress.
In the process, President
Obama attempted nothing less than an assault on the
timeless notion of liberty itself:
"Through it all, we
have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we
succumbed to the fiction that all society's ills can be cured through
But we have always
understood that when times change, so must we; that
fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new
challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms
ultimately requires collective action."
After praising the
"collective" and mocking the notion that America is a "nation of takers,"
President Obama targeted the political opposition. He targeted those who
"deny" climate change, attacked those who allegedly refused to reward the
elderly for their contributions, and defied critics whom he said wanted
"perpetual war." He attacked the rich--as he has done so often over the past
four years--and painted a caricature of an unjust nation: "...our country
cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely
make it....We do not believe that in this country, freedom is reserved for
the lucky, or happiness for the few."
President Obama's address
failed to deliver on promises earlier in the day by senior political adviser
David Axelrod that the speech would sound themes of national unity on a day
of national "consecration." Instead, the president sounded combative themes
familiar from his divisive first term, albeit wrapped occasionally in the
lofty rhetoric of "hope" and "tolerance," and punctuated by the repeated
refrain: "We, the People."
He acknowledged Americans
have diverse concepts of liberty, but insisted that these could all fit
together under the collective mission of the government to achieve its
redistributive aims. Days after describing Republicans as... More...
"Zero Dark Thirty," Real or Fake
Extraction of Osama bin Laden?
(Jan 13, 2013)
is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from
reality. By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US
really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?
about it. The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"
-- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a
suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.
What? Pakistan is going to say, "No?"
Washington, DC / Hollywood, CA
-- The movie, Zero Dark Thirty, debuted yesterday and I dashed
down to the Regal Cinema 22 to see it. Did not read the book, which is
out in hard back under a different title than Zero Dark Thirty. Forgot
the book title but you can't miss it at the book store or at Amazon on line.
The book was written by one of the Navy SEALs who participated in the
extraction -- more like the straightforward shooting, the execution -- of
Osama bin Laden at his hideout in Pakistan in some city called gobbledegook-bad.
All cities in Pakistan end in three letters: "bad."
something very unnerving about this whole episode of knocking off UBL -- Usama bin
Laden -- that occurred in 2011. It just doesn't pass the
smell test. Let's look at the basic facts.
The US government
claims they didn't know where UBL was hiding out for 10 years. Was it
in a cave in Afghanistan? A hut in whoopteedoobad? The Marriott
at Disneyland? Then, some CIA babe deduces -- after a lot of
water-boarding and other big time American torture -- that UBL was living in
a compound less than a mile from Pakistan's equivalent -- ha ha, equivalent
-- of America's West Point Military Academy in gobbledegook-bad.
is where the movie, the book, and what we were told happened appears to start departing from
reality. By "reality" I mean, what should have happened if the US
really was going to capture UBL from his compound in Pakistan?
about it. The US pays Pakistan several hundred billion dollars as an "ally,"
-- ho, ho, an "ally" -- and yet we somehow don't even have the juice or cajones to tell the Pakistani government that we would like to search a
suspected compound where the mastermind of 9/11 might be holed up.
What? Pakistan is going to say, "No?"
All the Pakistanis have to
do in broad daylight is to invite the occupants of the suspicious compound
outside for a cup of tea while both Pakistan -- our "ally,"
ho ho -- and the
US military quickly search the suspected UBL compound to determine whether
bin Laden lives there or not. It's really simple. And, hesto presto, if UBL is found hiding in
the laundry basket or microwave oven, or under the lawn mower in the compound, then the US military and Pakistan
arrests the dude and that's that. If not, offer apologies to the head
of household, dole out another billion dollars to Pakistan, and offer a free
round of Bud Lites, courtesy of Barack Obama.
Is that what happened? Nooooo. Instead, the US CIA and Barack Obama... More...
Marriage Tax Penalties in "Fiscal Cliff" Taxes
(Jan 02, 2013)
President Obama promised
to sign legislation to allow gay marriage; then he signed a new tax law that
penalizes married couples.
-- The US Congress just passed a new law that
increases the taxes of all Americans in many areas of the tax code. The new bill does
nothing to cut spending. And the new bill does not address our
out-of-control deficit, now at $17 trillion. Nor does it address our
looming debt ceiling.
But let's take a gander at a couple of the unintended tax
consequences that Congress and President Obama just foisted upon all married
couples. That consequence is what's known as "The Marriage Penalty
Remember in the old days when inflation was only trotting
along instead of galloping like it is today, and your IRS 1040 Tax Return
listed exemptions or deductions for single and married couples? The
deduction for a married couple was not double the deduction for a single
person. In other words, it was more advantageous, tax-wise, for
married couples to get a divorce and just live together as man and wife in
order to double their tax deductions and exemptions.
This same anomaly -- called a Marriage Penalty Tax -- was
stupidly passed in at least three sections of yesterday's House and
Senate-approved "Fiscal Cliff" tax bill and President Obama will now sign
off on this encouragement-to-get-a-divorce tax.
What are the new tax snafus that will penalize married
Snafu # 1: Income tax rates have now been increased
from 35% to 39.6% for individuals earning over $400K, $450K for a married
couple. That means your spouse is only worth $50K for tax sheltering
purposes. Hey, get a divorce, live together and your total tax
deduction will be $800K. Ironically, Congress' new "Fiscal Cliff" tax
law encourages divorce. If you are a small business filing as a sole
proprietor, it may be very important to you to shelter $800,000...
Karl Marx Award
Worst Piece of U.S. Legislation
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare,
has been the worst piece of US legislation since the passage of the Federal
Reserve Act. Rolling out on the web site called
www.healthcare.gov in Oct 2013,
Obamacare immediately crashed and burned. 6 million individuals have
lost their current health care plans due to the mandates in Obamacare that
forced insurance providers to cut current plans in order to comply with the
provisions of Obamacare. Essentially nobody has actually signed up for
Obamacare yet because the payment subroutine in the software system for
healthcare.gov has not been written. And nobody told the public about
that fact. So, come Jan 1, 2014, there will be individuals -- thank
God not too many because nobody could get through all the crash and burn
error messages on the online sign up screens for Obamacare -- who will find
out at their doctor's office that they are NOT covered for health insurance.
Surprise! As we go into 2014 and the employer sign up mandates go into
effect, it is estimated that some 80 million individuals will lose their
health care insurance as small businesses find it cheaper to cut their
employee coverage than pay double and triple their current employee health
insurance rates. The only hope for the US is that Obamacare will
continue to be the most expensive government flop ever -- costing some 680
million dollars just for the web site costs alone -- and this pernicious
piece of punitive legislation will be abolished by a newly elected slate of
Tea Party and Conservative majority in the 2014 Congress.